PDF Summary:The Man Who Broke Capitalism, by David Gelles

Jack Welch, former CEO of General Electric, is often credited as a business visionary who transformed corporate America. But in The Man Who Broke Capitalism, David Gelles argues that Welch's legacy is far more damaging than most realize. Welch championed "shareholder primacy"—the idea that companies should prioritize shareholder returns above all else—and used GE as a testing ground for this philosophy. His approach involved mass layoffs, aggressive outsourcing, risky financial practices, and an obsessive focus on quarterly earnings.

Gelles examines how Welch's strategies spread across corporate America, contributing to wage stagnation, weakened unions, and increased inequality. The guide also explores the theoretical foundations of shareholder primacy, the consequences of Welch's approach at GE and beyond, and an alternative framework called stakeholder capitalism that considers the needs of employees, communities, and the environment alongside shareholder interests.

(continued)...

The Laws and Economics Behind Its Rise

Gelles argues that the rise of deregulated capitalism created conditions for corporate dominance. In the 1970s, economists like Milton Friedman posited that firms should focus solely on increasing shareholder profit, disregarding any other obligations. This idea gained traction among business leaders and policymakers, leading to a change in corporate priorities.

At the same time, deregulation efforts, particularly during the Reagan administration, relaxed laws that had previously constrained big businesses. This allowed companies to pursue consolidations and acquisitions more freely, leading to increased market concentration. Consequently, a few large companies came to dominate many industries, reducing competition and consumer choice. This consolidation has had negative effects on workers, including depressed wages and fewer job opportunities, while boosting earnings for investors and corporate leaders.

Deregulation and the Rise of Corporate Giants

In The Great Reversal, economist Thomas Philippon argues that the US economy has become less competitive over the past 40 years, with a few large firms dominating many industries. He attributes this to a combination of factors, including lax antitrust enforcement, deregulation, and the rise of debt-financed takeovers. Philippon explains that the deregulation of banking and securities markets in the 1980s made it easier for companies to borrow large sums of money to finance acquisitions. At the same time, the tax code allowed companies to deduct interest payments on this debt, making leveraged buyouts even more attractive. This created a situation where it was often more profitable for companies to grow by acquiring competitors than by investing in their own operations.

Jack Welch's Implementation of Shareholder-First Policies at GE

Welch prioritized shareholder value within GE, Gelles explains. He used GE Capital to keep the company's shares rising, setting sky-high earnings targets and pressuring executives to hit them, often through acquisitions that weren’t strategically sound. He also used GE Capital to lower the company’s taxes, leveraging a legal adjustment that enabled GE to evade paying the IRS billions of dollars. Welch reduced the amount of information GE released about the finance division, making it difficult for investors to understand GE's revenue sources. He also used stock buybacks to increase the company's EPS, causing the share value to rise.

(Shortform note: Stock buybacks are a way for managers to increase their company’s EPS, which investors often reward with a higher share value. This is because accounting rules allow companies to remove repurchased shares from the EPS denominator, which means that the same earnings are spread over fewer shares. For example, if a company has 100 shares outstanding and earns $100, its EPS is $1. If it buys back 10 shares, its EPS increases to $1.11, even though its earnings haven’t changed. This can make the company look more profitable and attractive to investors, who may bid up its share price.)

Welch's prioritization of shareholder interests harmed employees and the corporation's reputation. He laid off workers, cut benefits, and presided over several controversies, including cheating the government, colluding on prices, and misappropriating international assistance. He also managed an attempt to dodge accountability for polluting the Hudson River by releasing hazardous chemicals into it.

(Shortform note: A meta-analysis of 588 studies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) found that when companies adopt profit-seeking policies that are perceived as socially irresponsible, it can lead to a shift in employee identification and stakeholder trust. This shift can damage the company's reputation and cause long-term harm to the organization. This research supports Gelles's argument that Welch's actions harmed both employees and GE's reputation.)

Consequences, Critiques, and Alternatives to Welchism

We will discuss the damage done by Welchism, then consider an alternative approach.

The Damage Done by Welchism

Economic & Corporate Fallout

Gelles argues that the risky financial practices of GE Capital contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. The financial arm of GE, GE Capital, contributed over half of the firm's profits. Welch leveraged it to secure favorable interest rates, reduce GE's taxes, and stabilize its quarterly profits. The financial arm enabled GE to leverage its highest-tier credit rating, which let GE secure financing at cheaper rates than its rivals. It was interconnected with GE's industrial sectors, which had consistent profits and physical assets. This enabled General Electric to keep its AAA rating without retaining excessive capital. GE Capital made bold deals and adapted quickly with its financial methods.

(Shortform note: In the decades leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, the financial system underwent a transformation that enabled large financial subsidiaries like GE Capital to expand rapidly while maintaining top credit ratings. According to Zoltan Pozsar et al., the rise of the “shadow banking” system—comprising non-bank financial intermediaries—allowed these entities to fund their activities through wholesale money markets. These markets provided cheap, short-term funding for longer-term, riskier assets, allowing firms to grow their balance sheets without the capital constraints faced by traditional banks. The shadow banking system operated with far less oversight and capital requirements than traditional banks, creating an environment where financial innovation outpaced regulatory frameworks.)

It enabled him to provide steady earnings increases. At the close of quarters, there would frequently be a surge of activity to boost profits and apply restructuring charges as necessary, aiding the parent company in fulfilling Wall Street's expectations. The company's stock performance appeared to rise each quarter, due to the pension fund's stock market investments, which then boosted GE's shares. GE Capital broadened its activities to include stock trading, private equity investments, and credit cards with high interest rates.

(Shortform note: Restructuring charges are one-time expenses that a company incurs when it closes down or fundamentally reorganizes parts of its operations. These charges can include costs related to employee layoffs, facility closures, asset write-downs, and other expenses associated with restructuring efforts. By taking these charges, companies aim to streamline operations, reduce costs, and improve long-term profitability. However, restructuring charges can also signal underlying financial challenges or strategic shifts within the organization.)

In 2004, Immelt approved spending half a billion dollars to buy Western Asset Mortgage Capital, a significant force in the subprime sector. While owned by GE, WMC became a leading subprime lender in the nation, issuing about $65 billion in loans to thousands upon thousands of homebuyers who were unqualified. In 2007, WMC disclosed a billion-dollar loss. GE scrambled to stop the losses, closing positions, dismissing most of the staff, and accepting a heavily discounted offer to sell WMC. In April 2008, GE announced its earnings for the initial quarter, which fell significantly short of what Wall Street expected.

(Shortform note: The company that GE bought in 2004 was not Western Asset Mortgage Capital, as David Gelles claims. According to the company’s SEC filings, Western Asset Mortgage Capital was created in 2012 and has never been owned by GE. It’s possible that Gelles is referring to a different company, but if so, he doesn’t provide enough information to identify it.)

GE's target was $700 million short. Investors sold their GE shares, causing a 12 percent drop. In September 2008, the worldwide economic crisis was fully underway. With the worldwide financial system in jeopardy, GE faced increasing costs to borrow funds and required as much cash as possible to manage its roughly $90 billion in short-term liabilities. A growing number of banks were collapsing, with more seeming on the brink, and the aftereffects placed a huge strain on GE's cash. In the latter part of September, a well-known analyst reduced the earnings prediction for GE, resulting in a 9% decline in the stock. Investors in the bond market indicated that GE's debt, which had been safeguarded by its top-tier AAA credit rating for a long time, was nearing junk status.

Investment-Grade and Junk Bonds

In The Bond Book, Annette Thau explains that credit ratings divide corporate bonds into two broad categories: investment-grade, which are rated BBB–/Baa3 or higher, and speculative-grade, commonly called “junk,” which are rated below BBB–/Baa3. The distinction is crucial because many institutional investors are restricted to holding only investment-grade bonds. When the market begins to doubt an issuer’s credit quality, yields on that issuer’s bonds rise and prices fall to levels characteristic of speculative-grade issues, even if the rating agencies have not yet changed the formal rating. In other words, the bond market often anticipates a downgrade: investors may price a bond as if it were already below investment grade long before the rating agencies officially reclassify it as junk.

Social & Political Repercussions

Gelles notes that Welch’s strategies led to job losses and weakened unions. He outsourced jobs to other companies and moved jobs abroad, decreasing the amount of unionized workers. He also relocated jobs from regions supportive of labor, further decreasing the proportion of unionized workers. He managed this without clashing with unions and didn't experience a significant strike during his tenure as CEO.

(Shortform note: Welch’s ability to weaken unions without facing strikes was partly due to the labor context of the late 20th century. During this period, the US government’s enforcement of labor laws weakened, and companies increasingly threatened to relocate jobs to discourage union activity. This made unions more cautious about striking, as they feared job losses and plant closures. The combination of weakened labor law enforcement and the threat of job relocation created an environment where large companies could erode union strength with relatively little open conflict.)

Welch's strategies also had a ripple effect on other companies. Investors began pushing every company they held for higher earnings. Boeing, for example, acquired McDonnell Douglas, which was managed by someone who had previously worked as an executive at GE and had been trained by Welch. The acquisition led to reductions in jobs, outsourcing, and a shift in focus from quality and safety to cost reduction and increasing profits. The company also became stricter with unions, cutting positions and embracing outsourcing. The changes led to a decline in worker morale, and in 2000, Boeing engineers launched a strike.

The 2000 Boeing Strike

In Flying Blind, Peter Robison writes that interviews with Boeing engineers and union leaders revealed that the 2000 walkout was a result of the company’s new management, which came from McDonnell Douglas. The new management implemented a new budgeting system and performance review system that didn’t take into account the engineers’ professional judgment, which led to a decline in their loyalty to the company. The new management also implemented a new performance review system that didn’t take into account the engineers’ professional judgment, which led to a decline in their loyalty to the company.

Gelles explains that Welch's strategy also contributed to the financialization of industries. Financialization involves earning income from financial offerings instead of creating goods. Welch transformed GE from an industrial company into a financial powerhouse, with GE Capital representing 40% of revenues and 60% of profits. He used financial engineering to hit profit goals and reward shareholders. This move toward a focus on financialization spread across different sectors, increasing their focus on financial offerings over goods production.

The Origins of Financialization

The idea of the “financialization of industries” has its roots in the work of scholars like Greta R. Krippner, a sociologist who has studied the rise of financial markets and institutions in the US economy. Krippner argues that financialization refers to a transformation in the pattern of capital accumulation in which profits are increasingly generated through financial channels rather than through the production and trade of goods and services. She traces the origins of financialization to the 1970s and 1980s, when policy-makers in the US actively promoted the expansion of financial markets as a way to manage economic crises and maintain growth.

Towards a Stakeholder Alternative

As an alternative to Welchism, Gelles suggests stakeholder capitalism, which is a return to the collective ethos of the postwar economic boom. Unlike Welchism, stakeholder capitalism considers what's necessary for employees, the community, and the planet, not just shareholders.

What Is Stakeholder Capitalism?

Stakeholder capitalism is a business philosophy that prioritizes the interests of all stakeholders—employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and the environment—alongside shareholders. It emphasizes long-term value creation, ethical practices, and social responsibility, aiming to balance profit with positive societal impact. You can practice stakeholder capitalism in your daily life by keeping a tiny “stakeholder ledger” for your major decisions. For example, when considering a new job or a big purchase, jot down who benefits and who might be harmed by your choice. If the ledger is clearly positive, go for it. If not, reconsider.