PDF Summary:The Girls Are Gone, by Michael Brodkorb and Allison Mann

When David and Sandra Rucki decided to separate, no one could predict the shocking lengths Sandra would go to deprive her husband of custody rights. In The Girls Are Gone, Michael Brodkorb and Allison Mann recount the twisting journey of David's search for his missing daughters, Samantha and Gianna, against the backdrop of Sandra's contentious legal battles with her own family.

David spends over two years following elusive clues, fueled by his unwavering determination to reunite with the girls. As allegations and countercharges engulf Sandra and those who enabled her, the story unravels with courtroom drama, ultimately revealing disturbing details surrounding the girls' disappearance and eventual discovery on the rural ranch where they were hidden.

(continued)...

The quest to locate Samantha and Gianna Rucki, who had vanished, commenced.

The story chronicles how Samantha and Gianna left their home on April 19, 2013. The narrative chronicles the extensive and relentless search by David and the authorities to find the girls, culminating in their discovery at a ranch known as White Horse after more than two years had passed.

Sandra masterminded the departure of her two daughters from their home on April 19, 2013.

A judge in Dakota County awarded Tammy Love temporary guardianship over her five children on April 19, 2013. When Tammy arrived at the home on Ireland Place later in the day, she observed that the girls were still absent after school hours. David communicated the news of the girls' absence that evening.

The disappearance of the girls was connected with the actions of Dale Nathan and Michael Rhedin.

Sandra had the company of her associates Dale Nathan and Michael Rhedin on the night of April 19, 2013. As Dale Nathan would later admit publicly, Sandra picked him up at his home earlier that evening. Samantha and Gianna, along with their mother, Nathan, and Sandra, got into the car in Lakeville.

The impact of opting against the issuance of an Amber Alert on the search efforts.

The Lakeville Police remained skeptical about any criminal activity occurring on April 19, 2013. The inquiry proceeded on the assumption that Samantha and Gianna had chosen to disappear of their own accord. Relatives believed the daughters had chosen to live with their mother, not realizing the lengths Sandra would go to in order to hide their location. An Amber Alert was not initiated.

The Lakeville police were convinced that the girls had departed voluntarily.

The general public was not aware that the Rucki sisters were initially categorized as runaways by the Lakeville officials. During his deposition, Detective Hakanson seemed unperturbed, conveying his belief that the mother was accompanying the girls.

The widespread belief held that David Rucki posed a threat due to his history as a violent caregiver.

Throughout the contentious divorce and subsequent struggle over the children's guardianship, Sandra and her supporters consistently portrayed David in a negative light, accusing him of causing physical and psychological damage to his offspring. She seemingly sought to sway the perception of the public by suggesting the girls left out of concern for their well-being.

David Rucki never ceased in his determined efforts to locate his daughters.

The family and close friends of Samantha and Gianna tirelessly pursued their whereabouts for 944 days.

Tom Rucke played a crucial role in bringing to light the financial transactions.

David and his sister Tammy sought assistance from Tom Rucke to follow up on any possible clues. Tom initiated his investigation by scrutinizing Sandra's financial activities. Drawing on his background in federal law enforcement, Tom was aware that Sandra's spending patterns would surely leave a traceable path. The task simply involved tracing the path.

The investigative journalism of Brandon Stahl was instrumental in capturing national attention for the case.

Journalist Brandon Stahl covered the case of the missing Lakeville siblings, which had been ongoing for two years following their parents' contentious split. The story meticulously detailed the sequence of occurrences leading up to their disappearance, incorporating images that depicted the young women. The public first learned of the girls' vanishing and the fervent search their father undertook to find them.

The ranch was the place where the girls were discovered.

On November 18, 2015, after more than two years, Samantha and Gianna were at last discovered.

Samantha and Gianna Rucki found refuge with Doug and Gina Dahlen for a period of 942 days.

Herman, Minnesota, the town where the two girls lived, was home to 437 residents. The girls found sanctuary at a ranch that specialized in equine rehabilitation, which was under the proprietorship of Doug and Gina Dahlen, individuals familiar to Dede Evavold. Samantha and Gianna's concealment resulted in a period of 942 days during which their parent was wrongfully denied their parental rights.

Dede Evavold served as a go-between, maintaining contact between Sandra and the Dahlens, which allowed them to keep communicating with the girls.

From the outset, Sandra found a pillar of support in Dede Evavold. Their mother was with Samantha and Gianna when they went to Evavold's residence, an event that signaled the start of their vanishing on April 19, 2013. Sandra moved her children to a countryside residence, convinced that such a measure would shield them from the influence of their father. Sandra kept in touch with her daughter by using Dede as a go-between. Sandra did not try to contact Doug and Gina Dahlen or her children in any way. She furnished Evavold with updates, insights, and monetary assistance, which in turn were relayed to the Dahlens.

Practical Tips

• You can enhance your personal safety by setting up a private check-in system with friends or family. Create a schedule where you check in with someone you trust at predetermined times when you're going to be in a situation that might make you feel unsafe. For example, if you're going on a date with someone you met online, arrange to text a friend with a specific message at a set time to confirm you're okay.
• Develop your investigative skills by practicing how to analyze financial records for unusual activity. Start with your own bank statements and look for patterns, recurring payments, and any anomalies. This can help you spot potential fraud in your accounts and also give you a basic understanding of how financial tracking works, which can be useful in various situations, such as monitoring spending or detecting unauthorized transactions.
• Foster community awareness by volunteering with local organizations that support missing persons. By helping out with administrative tasks, spreading awareness through social media, or participating in community events, you contribute to the efforts of finding missing individuals and provide support to affected families. This not only aids the community but also educates you on the processes and challenges involved in such cases.

Legal proceedings were initiated against Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, Dede Evavold, and Doug and Gina Dahlen.

This section explores the progression of legal proceedings that stemmed from the allegations against Sandra, tracing the journey from the initial accusations to the eventual release of the Dahlens from detention.

Sandra Grazzini-Rucki first faced legal issues and was apprehended in Florida.

Sandra was accused of infringing on parental privileges, which resulted in her facing three distinct felony charges. The police faced considerable obstacles in their pursuit following the initiation of formal accusations. Ultimately, she was discovered at a vacation spot in Florida.

Sandra's case involved claims of mistreatment and psychological harm, which she presented in an attempt to obstruct the judicial proceedings she was confronted with.

Throughout the entire ordeal, starting with the initial OFP filing in 2011 and continuing through to her later resentencing, Sandra persistently tried to show she was suffering unjust treatment due to the circumstances. Sandra's circumstances were characterized by a tumultuous array of assertions, including claims of destitution and inadequate financial means.

An attempt was made to obstruct Michael Brodkorb's investigative journalism on the case by filing a complaint alleging human rights violations.

Sandra filed an inaccurate request for a harassment restraining order against Michael just prior to her sentencing. Michael photographed her leaving the courthouse, an action that ignited Sandra's anger when he disseminated the story online.

Sandra received a conviction on six felony counts for infringing upon parental rights.

Sandra opted to confront the charges in court, rejecting multiple settlement offers from the prosecution. Sandra's trial, which extended beyond a week, concluded with her conviction on six charges associated with obstructing a parent's rights.

Sandra was handed a one-year jail term for two separate charges, with the condition that the sentence would be suspended over a six-year span.

Sandra received a sentence of one year and an additional day for impeding the rights of a parent, although the enforcement of this sentence was postponed. She received a six-year probationary term. Every year, beginning on November 18, she had to spend fifteen days in detention and also dedicate twelve days to a community work program called Sentence to Service, as part of her yearly probation terms. Sandra was swiftly apprehended and taken into custody.

Sandra's behavior in fulfilling the court's mandates and her later violations of the terms of her probation

The lawyer representing Sandra argued that the prospect of probation as part of her sentence could present difficulties, since she might prefer to serve time in jail rather than risk violating probation terms. Sandra submitted a formal request for Judge Asphaug to carry out her sentencing. She chose to stay in detention rather than being granted probationary freedom. Sandra's release from custody was contingent upon her agreement to be monitored via a GPS device secured to her leg. Sandra's noncompliance resulted in her being taken back into custody.

Doug and Gina Dahlen were also involved in the legal case with Dede Evavold.

Dede Evavold, in collaboration with Doug and Gina Dahlen, was charged with two felonies for concealing the girls from their lawful guardian for a duration of 942 days.

The court dismissed their plea to dismiss the case.

Evavold and the Dahlens were charged for violating a Minnesota statute that forbids interfering with the legal parental rights of a custodian. The prosecution was required to establish, with certainty that leaves no room for doubt, that the individual accused of the crime unlawfully obstructed the custodial rights granted by a judicial authority to another individual.

Evavold's unfortunate choice to act as her own legal representative during the proceedings

Dede Evavold served as her own counsel throughout all the legal proceedings. Her behavior during the legal process turned out to be disastrous. She consistently ignored the directives set forth by Judge Asphaug from the outset. Evavold spoke in a manner marked by a peculiar vocabulary and a monotone voice, seemingly oblivious to the gravity of the serious charges being tried against her. Judge Asphaug persistently guided Evavold towards better decisions by elucidating the potential repercussions stemming from her courtroom conduct. Evavold demonstrated a significant deficiency in understanding both the legal procedures and the precise nature of the charges against her, impairing her capacity to formulate a robust defense.

Doug and Gina Dahlen agreed to a plea deal aiming to lessen their potential sentencing.

In an effort to evade incarceration, Doug and Gina Dahlen attempted to get their criminal charges dropped. The Dahlens' attorneys filed multiple motions to have the charges against their clients dropped before the trials began. The court documents argued that the law was too broad and emphasized their parental rights, which naturally encompassed the freedom to practice their religion. The judicial system dismissed the appeals of the Dahlens and mandated their presence to testify in the criminal proceedings against Grazzini-Rucki and Evavold.

Doug and Gina Dahlen were sentenced alongside Evavold.

Judge Asphaug was well aware of Sandra and Evavold's conduct, as observed in court proceedings and various other contexts. The magistrate was responsible for monitoring the behavior of all parties throughout the duration of each case and also for delivering the verdicts.

Evavold persistently denied any wrongdoing, which led to multiple violations of the conditions of her probation.

Judge Asphaug sentenced Evavold to a six-month incarceration period, and also established two consecutive probation terms that cumulatively amounted to eight years. The judicial order stipulated that Evavold must settle two separate penalties, each totaling $944, as a condition of her probation. The judicial order also stipulated that Evavold must refrain from mentioning the Rucki family in her digital postings.

The perception of the Rucki family towards judicial decisions was impacted by the premature release of the Dahlens from custody.

Doug and Gina Dahlen were sentenced to a period of thirty-one days in jail followed by probation, which was a major component of their sentencing. They were each sentenced to a year in jail; however, this would be postponed for two years as long as they comply with the terms of their probation during this period. For every day Samantha and Gianna remained at the White Horse Ranch, they endured an equivalent day of confinement.

The individuals convicted of interfering with the custodial privileges regarding the Rucki sisters served a cumulative sentence of approximately 385 days in jail. Samantha and Gianna Rucki's time spent at the White Horse Ranch extended far beyond initial expectations, amounting to a duration of 944 days.

Practical Tips

• You can learn about the legal system by attending public court sessions to better understand the judicial process and the consequences of legal actions. By observing real cases, you'll gain insight into courtroom procedures, the importance of legal representation, and the potential outcomes of self-representation or plea agreements. For example, find a local courthouse, check the schedule for public hearings, and sit in on a variety of cases to see how different legal scenarios play out.
• Enhance your understanding of probation by volunteering with organizations that support individuals on probation. This will give you a firsthand look at the challenges faced during probation and the importance of compliance with its terms. Look for local community centers or non-profits that offer programs for individuals on probation and offer your time to help with their activities or mentorship programs.
• Educate yourself on parental rights and responsibilities by creating a discussion group with other interested individuals. This can lead to a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding parental rights, custody issues, and the legal ramifications of interference. Start by inviting friends or community members for regular meetings, choose relevant topics for each session, and use publicly available resources or invite experts to facilitate the discussions.