PDF Summary:Radical Uncertainty, by John Kay and Mervyn King

In the face of uncertainty, how do we make sense of the world? There are countless unexpected events that defy our ability to plan or calculate—from historic events like Napoleon's march into Russia, to modern crises like the 2008 financial collapse. In Radical Uncertainty, John Kay and Mervyn King argue that probabilistic models and economic theories often fail to capture reality, as the complexities of human behavior and rapidly evolving circumstances render numerical predictions obsolete.

To navigate uncertainty, the authors propose shifting our focus toward narratives, open dialogue, and collective wisdom. They demonstrate how sharing stories, understanding context, acknowledging diverse viewpoints, and drawing on shared experience can reveal insights that mathematical models alone cannot. As certainties disappear and challenges persist, we must look to people, not just data sets, to find our way forward.

(continued)...

• The Principle of Indifference, also known as the Principle of Insufficient Reason, suggests that when no evidence is available to favor one outcome over another, all possible outcomes should be considered equally probable. This principle is commonly used in Bayesian probability theory as a way to assign initial probabilities in the absence of specific information. It is often applied to simple scenarios like coin flips, dice rolls, or card draws, where all outcomes are assumed to be equally likely when no other information is present. The principle helps in situations where there is a lack of knowledge or evidence to differentiate between potential outcomes.
• Hindsight bias is the tendency to believe that past events were more predictable than they actually were. 'Resulting' is the concept of judging the quality of a decision based solely on its outcome, without considering the role of luck or unforeseen events. It highlights how people often overestimate the influence of skill in successful outcomes and underestimate the role of chance. This bias can lead to a distorted view of decision-making effectiveness based on the outcomes observed after the fact.
• Expected value in decision-making is a concept that involves calculating the average outcome of a decision based on the probabilities of different results. It helps decision-makers assess the potential gains or losses associated with different choices. By considering both the probability of each outcome and the value or utility associated with those outcomes, expected value provides a way to quantify the overall benefit or risk of a decision. It is a fundamental tool in decision theory and can assist in making rational choices in uncertain situations.
• The broader perception of 'risk' extends beyond just the variability in asset values. It encompasses the possibility of events deviating from expected outcomes and the narratives we construct to interpret uncertainties. Understanding risk involves considering the potential falsity of these narratives and the implications for decision-making. This broader view of risk emphasizes the importance of context, interpretation, and the inherent unpredictability in real-world scenarios.

Investigating various strategies for decision-making in the presence of uncertainty.

The value and importance of narrative reasoning cannot be overstated.

This section underscores the significance of narrative techniques as a crucial strategy for maneuvering through situations filled with uncertainty. Kay and King maintain that narratives extend well beyond mere tales exchanged among individuals; they are fundamental components of our thought processes, woven into the complex tapestry of our lives. They explore the use of historical narratives, case studies, and metaphors as tools for understanding complex situations.

Individuals make sense of complex occurrences by constructing stories that incorporate lessons from past events.

We utilize stories to impose structure and significance on a disordered history. Historians strive to weave together a coherent and logically consistent story that links a series of events, the intentions behind them, and their ultimate results when examining the rise and fall of empires, the causes of conflicts, or the life stories of significant individuals. The documentation of history is inevitably influenced by the perspectives and prejudices of the individuals recording it, as pointed out by Kay and King. They can, however, impart important understanding, furnish us with a perspective, and aid in our absorption of lessons from the past.

Case studies are frequently utilized in business schools to analyze the fundamental aspects of business situations through the use of story-driven examination.

Business schools frequently utilize case studies as a navigational tool for complex business decisions by developing and interpreting stories. Students are presented with detailed accounts of real or hypothetical situations, asked to delve into the relevant facts, and encouraged to construct a narrative explaining the circumstances and propose courses of action. Kay and King highlight the way this approach improves students' capacity for making wise choices, learning from their encounters, and steering through scenarios brimming with unpredictability.

Anthropology prioritizes understanding through stories and the examination of context, frequently demonstrated by in-depth analyses similar to Geertz's idea of thick description.

Understanding social phenomena requires a profound recognition of the stories and the specific circumstances in which they unfold, a concept highlighted by Clifford Geertz's idea of "thick description." The term "thick description" refers to the creation of complex and detailed narratives that encompass a range of interpretations from individual motivations and convictions to broader societal frameworks and customary practices. The authors contend that, similar to anthropologists exploring unfamiliar societies, we craft intricate stories that help us make sense of our everyday encounters by interpreting behaviors and messages in their relevant settings.

Using metaphorical language is essential in offering perspectives that are enlightening.

Metaphors serve as a potent instrument for communicating intricate concepts and grasping scenarios that might at first seem strange. Exploring connections across different disciplines enhances our grasp of unfamiliar situations and fosters the creation of unique viewpoints. John Kay and Mervyn King employ the metaphor of "bubbles" to encapsulate the complex phenomenon observed in the stock market. They argue that metaphors are not just embellishments of speech but are crucial instruments that individuals use to shape and communicate their ideas.

A technique designed to enhance collective conversation.

This section underscores the importance of scrutinizing widely accepted narratives to confirm that the basis for decisions is solid. Kay and King highlight the necessity of creating a culture that promotes free dialogue, values diverse perspectives, and accepts disagreement, which is essential for mitigating risks associated with homogenous thought patterns and for crafting robust strategies.

Our understanding advances through dialogue and the correction of false narratives.

Challenging the prevailing narratives is essential to deepen our comprehension and improve our decision-making processes. Throughout history, progress has often been impeded by a multitude of incorrect convictions and narratives that were not well-founded, including the erroneous medical concept of miasma and the economic debate's assertion of an imminent maximum in oil output. Kay and King underscore the importance of critically evaluating popular narratives, thoroughly analyzing evidence, and taking into account alternative perspectives, especially when they challenge deeply held beliefs.

Questioning the fundamental assumptions is crucial because it reveals how unanimous agreement in decision-making can lead to disastrous outcomes.

The authors warn that groups, when stressed, often converge on a singular perspective, thereby inadequately acknowledging alternative viewpoints. The disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion serves as a clear example of the dangers of groupthink during the presidency of John F. Kennedy. Kay and King emphasize the need to challenge entrenched convictions and encourage diverse perspectives to avoid replicating the mistakes made by Kennedy's administration during the confrontation involving nuclear missiles in Cuba.

The insights of experts often improve the process of making decisions, which demonstrates the idea of wisdom shared among many.

John Kay and Mervyn King examine the idea that a group's collective insight often exceeds the understanding of any individual within that group. However, they caution against unwavering faith in widespread consensus, emphasizing that the genuine worth of shared knowledge stems from the distinct perspectives of individual contributors, as opposed to merely aggregating the areas of agreement. Optimal outcomes are achieved through the delegation of responsibilities to those with the most expertise and the promotion of robust interaction and teamwork among these specialists.

Leaders must adeptly balance exerting authority and embracing diverse viewpoints, a vital component of successfully steering through uncertainty.

The authors argue that in situations characterized by unpredictability, successful leaders deliberately pursue diverse opinions and promote a range of insights. Decision-makers demonstrate effectiveness when they recognize the limits of their knowledge and appreciate the importance of scrutinizing their own assumptions. They promote equilibrium between making decisions and nurturing a setting conducive to frank dialogue, allowing their narratives to undergo scrutiny and modification.

Other Perspectives

• While narrative reasoning is important, it can also lead to oversimplification of complex issues and reliance on anecdotal evidence over empirical data.
• Stories can be subjective and may not always accurately represent the facts, leading to biased or incomplete understanding of events.
• Case studies, while useful, may not always be generalizable or applicable to different contexts, limiting their utility in decision-making.
• Anthropology's focus on stories and context might overlook quantitative methods that can offer more objective insights into social phenomena.
• Metaphorical language can sometimes obscure clarity, leading to misinterpretation or confusion rather than enlightenment.
• Scrutinizing accepted narratives is important, but it can also lead to a state of constant skepticism that hinders decision-making and consensus-building.
• Challenging prevailing narratives can be beneficial, but it can also destabilize established knowledge and lead to the rejection of well-substantiated theories.
• Questioning fundamental assumptions is crucial, but excessive skepticism can prevent decisive action and lead to paralysis by analysis.
• The insights of experts are valuable, but over-reliance on expertise can lead to elitism and the undervaluation of lay perspectives and experiential knowledge.
• Leaders balancing authority and diverse viewpoints is important, but too much emphasis on diversity of opinion can lead to a lack of clear direction and decision-making inefficiency.

The importance of storytelling, dialogue, and shared comprehension in navigating deep uncertainty.

People naturally gravitate towards socializing with others like themselves.

This section delves into the significance of our inherent tendency to collaborate and exchange knowledge in the face of deep uncertainty, underscoring our intrinsic communal nature, which favors collective action over pursuing personal advantages in isolation.

Groups with social bonds formed through the development of collective intelligence, which was enhanced by working together and managing risks as a community.

Kay and King explore the beginnings of social kinship groups during the Paleolithic era, highlighting the early recognition of the benefits of cooperation in economic and social settings. By pooling their resources, these collectives bolstered their ability to withstand a range of unforeseeable factors, such as capricious climate patterns and hunting expeditions that did not yield success. Humanity's pooling of collective wisdom and resources laid the groundwork for a form of 'collective intelligence,' enabling the combination of diverse talents and experiences to tackle challenges and adapt to changing environments.

Institutions and practices emerge through developmental processes that are not genetically based, and these in turn mold the progression of social and cultural evolution.

The authors acknowledge the profound impact that social and cultural advancements have had on human development, as well as the shaping of our cognitive abilities by biological evolution. The evolution of traditions such as gift-giving, along with the advancement of narrative and communication, as well as the establishment of structures like markets, hierarchies, and legal systems, has been instrumental in promoting cooperation, reducing uncertainty, and nurturing complex social and economic networks. In this context, evolution is unrelated to genetic changes.

The complexity of systems has grown through cooperative endeavors, highlighting the importance of task specialization and mutual reliance.

Human social interactions, especially when it is not feasible to create detailed agreements due to the unpredictable nature of future events, rely on a foundation of mutual trust and the exchange of benefits between parties. Kay and King highlight the importance of selfless actions, which are not rewarded, as a key component in creating kin-based social structures where individuals contribute to the group without expecting immediate or equal returns. They also explore the idea that focusing on distinct tasks can boost the group's productivity, yet they acknowledge that this specialization in labor leads to intricate webs of dependency and necessitates a substantial level of trust along with meticulous orchestration.

Human achievements underscore the error in depicting individuals as isolated beings.

Kay and King argue that communication is essential to human achievement, as it enables us to share knowledge, learn from experience, and coordinate our actions. Describing individuals as isolated, rational beings focused solely on maximizing their own pleasure fails to acknowledge the intrinsic attributes of human behavior. The book highlights how the intricate process of building the Airbus A380, requiring the cooperative efforts of numerous people, showcases the importance of shared knowledge and the vital link between successful communication and economic success.

Our understanding of the world's workings is molded by the narratives we construct.

Understanding the intricacies of a world steeped in deep uncertainty necessitates the use of storytelling. The authors argue that the evolution of our brains has favored adaptability over precision, requiring us to possess the ability to craft and evaluate narratives, as well as to differentiate between effective frameworks and intricate fallacies when dealing with the unknown.

Our mental faculties have developed to prioritize flexibility over the pursuit of the best possible outcome, highlighting the distinction between a form of rationality that has been molded by evolutionary forces and the abstract notion of rationality.

Kay and King maintain that the evolution of human thought has prioritized adaptability over pinpointing the optimal solution. We use simple heuristics, draw lessons from what we've been through, and continually adjust our behavior to suit the ever-changing environment rather than attempting to predict the future with complete information. The rationality honed over numerous generations to navigate unforeseen situations sharply differs from the assumed rationality in economic models that assumes full knowledge and behavior aimed at optimization.

We cope, not optimise: an example of how people seek "good enough," not "best" outcomes

The authors argue that in the presence of profound unpredictability, it is not possible to forecast future events with accuracy, which in turn makes it impossible to identify the best course of action. We aim for acceptable outcomes by making decisions that seem prudent given our current knowledge, and we adjust our plans as fresh information emerges. The authors present "satisficing" as a strategy that seeks acceptable resolutions fulfilling our requirements, which is frequently more practical and successful when making choices in unpredictable situations, compared to the pursuit of elusive ideal solutions.

Successful companies stand out by crafting compelling stories that encapsulate their vision, mission, and the strategies they plan to employ moving forward.

Kay and King argue that the bedrock of thriving enterprises is laid by crafting compelling narratives. The stories that define a company's aims and chart its strategic course offer a structure that steers its decisions, motivates its workforce, and draws in customers. Apple's focus on creating personal computers that are easy to use serves as a strong example of the way a persuasive story can drive progress and creativity, setting it apart from the more technically oriented approach favored by a major competitor.

Financial markets represent battlegrounds where competing stories intersect, demonstrating the influence of perceptions on the formation of market values.

Financial markets, with their constant fluctuations and unpredictable price movements, are a prime example of how narratives drive behavior. Market participants, such as investors, traders, and analysts, grapple with incomplete data, interpret occurrences through their unique perspectives, and construct narratives to justify the decisions they make. The authors emphasize the profound influence that the stories told within financial markets exert on shaping risk assessments, directing investment strategies, and influencing the general mood of the market, which extends past mere narration. They explore scenarios in which prevailing narratives drove speculative behavior, culminating in asset valuations reaching unsustainable levels, which ultimately triggered substantial downturns in the market.

We naturally seek certainty, yet we depend on the power of stories to comprehend and manage what we cannot predict, highlighting their influence on how we make decisions.

Kay and King argue that the skill of crafting narratives plays a vital role in helping us embrace and navigate the inherent uncertainties of our lives, even though we have a natural desire for certainty. We use stories to connect our past, present, and future, providing a structure to understand uncertainty and granting us a sense of control in a world where certainty is rare. Rather than trying to assign specific probabilities to uncertainties, storytelling offers a method to explore multiple scenarios, consider various outcomes, and decide on a course of action in the face of unpredictability.

Other Perspectives

• While people may gravitate towards socializing with others like themselves, this can lead to echo chambers and groupthink, which may hinder innovation and critical thinking.
• The development of collective intelligence through social bonds is significant, but it can also suppress individual creativity and lead to conformity.
• Institutions and practices may not be genetically based, but they can still perpetuate systemic biases and inequalities that are culturally ingrained.
• Cooperative endeavors and task specialization are important, but they can also create dependencies that may be problematic if the system faces disruptions that require rapid adaptation or self-sufficiency.
• Depicting individuals as part of a collective is more realistic, but it's also important to recognize the role of individual agency and the potential for individuals to effect change within a group or society.
• Narratives are crucial for understanding the world, but they can also oversimplify complex issues and lead to misconceptions if not critically examined.
• Prioritizing flexibility over the best possible outcome is practical, but it can sometimes lead to settling for mediocrity when striving for excellence could be achievable.
• Seeking "good enough" outcomes is a realistic approach, but it may also prevent people from achieving their full potential or from finding the best solutions to problems.
• While compelling stories are important for companies, they must be backed by actual performance and ethical practices; otherwise, they can mislead stakeholders.
• The influence of narratives in financial markets is undeniable, but an overreliance on stories can overshadow fundamental analysis and lead to financial bubbles or crashes.
• Relying on stories to manage uncertainty is useful, but it is also important to develop robust systems and policies that can withstand unexpected events, rather than just relying on narrative coherence.

Evaluating traditional approaches to decision-making.

Economics

This part of the narrative delves into the shortcomings of macroeconomics in dealing with real-world scenarios. The authors argue that the quest for a general equilibrium model has led to models that are divorced from reality, often relying on shocks and shifts to explain unexpected outcomes rather than acknowledging the limitations of using small-world models to describe large-world phenomena.

The unpredictability and variability inherent in uncertainty are frequently not fully accounted for in economic models when they are applied to real-world scenarios.

Kay and King argue that the increasing sophistication and computational strength of economic models often fail to adequately account for real-world economic disruptions, as demonstrated by the financial crisis spanning 2007 to 2008. These models typically assume a stable underlying structure for the economy, relying on shocks and shifts – exogenous changes in preferences or technology – to account for unexpected fluctuations. The authors argue that this approach does not take into account the ever-evolving economic systems and the significant influence of human actions, which encompasses the continual shifts in anticipations.

The mistake in economic models lies in the presumption of a constant state, similar to conducting tests within a controlled airstream environment.

The authors critically examine the practice of formulating economic models that are akin to experiments conducted in a controlled aerodynamic testing environment. Engineers conduct tests on scale models of aircraft in controlled environments that simulate wind patterns to evaluate how they react to certain situations, but the results are only pertinent if these simulated conditions accurately mirror real-world flight conditions. Kay and King argue that economists often build their models on the premise of stability and predictability, which might not accurately mirror the real-world economic dynamics. The industry of finance is fundamentally marked by deep-seated unpredictability, and models that fail to acknowledge this essential limitation are inevitably going to fail in unforeseeable manners.

Economists should focus on maximizing utility rather than imitating the methods of physics, demonstrating the kind of applied knowledge that is crucial for policy formulation.

Kay and King argue that practical experience should be incorporated into the development of economic policies. The authors propose that economists should take on roles similar to those of "dentists" or "engineers," utilizing their specialized knowledge and tools to address specific problems, rather than striving to imitate "physicists" by seeking universal laws. Economists are urged to stay grounded in practical realities, placing equal importance on qualitative understanding and quantitative evaluations, while recognizing the inherent limitations inherent in their models as they navigate complex and evolving circumstances.

Finance

Traditional economic models often fall short because they overemphasize methods based on probability while failing to acknowledge the existence of deep-seated uncertainty. The book explores the inherent limitations of models that assess financial risk, misunderstandings about the belief in perfectly efficient markets, and the strategies some investors use to find success by questioning established financial principles.

The inherent limitations of value at risk models played a substantial role in the financial downturn, as exemplified by the Viniar case.

Before the 2007-2008 financial turmoil, banks frequently used a method called Value at Risk, which was designed to estimate a bank's possible losses within certain probabilistic parameters. Kay and King contend that the models, which were based on historical data, failed to adequately consider the risks present in the constantly evolving financial environment. The authors note that the models failed to account for situations outside their predefined boundaries, and this, coupled with the mistaken belief that conditions would remain constant when they were actually subject to change, was a significant factor in the crisis.

The idea that markets function with efficiency has occasionally been misconstrued, suggesting that a useful model should not be confused with an exact representation of reality.

Financial thinking suggests that the pricing of securities reflects the incorporation of all available information. The authors argue that while it serves as a useful indicator of market efficiency, it should not be viewed as an entirely accurate representation of reality. Investors like Warren Buffet stand out by understanding that there are situations where market efficiency is not always the prevailing principle, and treating the efficient market hypothesis as an absolute certainty can lead to reduced alertness and a lack of appreciation for the real risks involved.

Investors who achieve success often do so by disregarding traditional financial theories, demonstrating that varied strategies can outperform theoretical models.

The authors scrutinize the distinctive investment strategies of Warren Buffett, George Soros, and Jim Simons, observing that such methods often lead to extraordinary gains and usually defy conventional economic theories. Investors such as Buffett and Simons, spanning from those holding assets for extended periods to practitioners of sophisticated algorithmic trading, highlight the importance of judgment, intuition, and adaptability in navigating the inherent fluctuations of the financial markets, which further emphasizes the futility of trying to capture all relevant factors in a single model.

Other Domains

This part of the book explores the misuse of models in different domains, including the management of oceanic resources, the design of retirement plans, and the prediction of migration patterns. The book illustrates how models frequently serve to create a false sense of impartiality, while in reality, they merely solidify preconceived outcomes.

Transport modeling frequently employs speculative numbers that can create an illusion of objectivity, which may endorse decisions that have previously been determined.

Transportation modeling often relies on assumptions about future traffic patterns, economic growth, and the value people assign to their time, trying to quantify elements that are inherently difficult to predict. The book references WebTAG, a UK transport appraisal framework, to demonstrate how these models are susceptible to manipulation, allowing for the presentation of biased outcomes under the guise of impartiality, which may support politically advantageous but economically imprudent policies.

Regulating fisheries highlights the inclination toward employing oversimplified models that reinforce political biases.

The collapse of the cod fisheries in Newfoundland's Grand Banks highlights the dangers associated with relying on complex models in situations where knowledge is incomplete and political pressures are strong. Despite the implementation of sophisticated regulatory frameworks, the approach to managing fish stocks failed to prevent the decline of what was previously an abundant resource. The book emphasizes the importance of assessing how models endure amidst changes, unpredictability, and varying objectives, and it also points out the tendency of those who create models to tailor results to fit pre-existing policy goals.

Regulatory measures, if not applied correctly, can unintentionally harm the very individuals they are designed to safeguard, especially when they involve retirement plans that necessitate a degree of predictability that cannot be achieved.

Regulations overseeing pension schemes, which aim to secure future disbursements, require a degree of certainty that cannot be achieved, compelling actuaries to forecast economic conditions over an extended period. The authors argue that the excessive focus on absolute certainty has led to the phasing out of many defined benefit pension plans, negatively impacting the individuals these regulations were designed to protect. John Kay and Mervyn King emphasize that when conjectural figures and improbable suppositions underpin UK pension regulations, there is a risk of adverse consequences in the face of deep uncertainty.

Employing models designed for specific situations to project results in wider applications underscored the substantial errors made in estimating migration numbers.

Future migration forecasting models often rely on historical data and construct their assumptions around social and financial influences. The authors highlight the dangers of relying on overly simplistic predictions by examining the unforeseen surge in European migration following the European Union's 2004 expansion, which led to a number of migrants that far surpassed the estimates in complex and ever-changing conditions. The authors stress the importance of recognizing that models have inherent constraints, particularly in situations that are inconsistent and where predicting human behavior is impractical.

The inappropriate application of models impedes thorough assessment and suppresses important conversations in the sphere of public policy.

The use of intricate models has become increasingly common in the sphere of public policy. The authors argue that these approaches often obscure the inherent uncertainties rather than elucidate them, making it more difficult for the public and policymakers to grasp the underlying reasons for decisions. Politicians frequently claim their policies are based on "evidence," but they typically overlook or downplay the subjective assumptions and the intrinsic uncertainty that underpin the models. Kay and King argue for the creation of a setting that values simple models, definitive assumptions, and robust debates, which in turn would strengthen the robustness and effectiveness of the processes used to make decisions.

Context

• Value at Risk (VaR) models are used in finance to estimate potential losses within a specific confidence level over a particular time frame. These models rely on historical data and statistical methods to quantify the risk of investments. During the 2007-2008 financial crisis, VaR models failed to adequately capture the risks present in the rapidly changing financial environment, contributing to the severity of the crisis. The limitations of VaR models became evident as they did not account for extreme events that fell outside their predefined boundaries, leading to significant losses for financial institutions.
• The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) posits that financial markets reflect all available information, making it impossible to consistently outperform the market through stock selection or market timing. It suggests that asset prices already incorporate and adjust to all relevant information instantly, leaving no room for investors to gain an edge based on publicly available data. EMH has three forms: weak, semi-strong, and strong, each representing different levels of information efficiency in the market. The hypothesis has implications for investors, as it challenges the idea of consistently beating the market and supports the notion of investing in diversified portfolios or index funds for long-term growth.
• Transport modeling involves predicting future traffic patterns, economic growth, and individual time valuation for decision-making. These models can be influenced by speculative numbers, potentially leading to biased outcomes that align with preconceived goals. Biases in transport modeling may result in decisions that appear objective but actually support politically advantageous yet economically imprudent policies. The susceptibility of transport models to manipulation underscores the importance of critically evaluating the assumptions and methodologies used in transportation planning.
• Fisheries management often involves complex ecosystems and uncertain variables. Oversimplified models in this context may fail to capture the full complexity of marine environments, leading to ineffective management strategies. These models can overlook critical factors like ecosystem interactions, fish population dynamics, and external influences, resulting in policies that may not adequately protect fish stocks or the marine ecosystem. The collapse of cod fisheries in Newfoundland's Grand Banks is a notable example where oversimplified models contributed to the mismanagement of fish stocks and subsequent decline in the resource.
• Regulations on retirement plans aim to ensure financial security for retirees by setting guidelines for pension schemes. Actuaries forecast economic conditions to manage pension funds, but the challenge lies in predicting long-term uncertainties accurately. Overemphasis on absolute certainty can lead to the phasing out of defined benefit pension plans, impacting retirees negatively. Deep uncertainty in economic forecasting can pose risks to pension regulations and the individuals they are meant to protect.
• Migration forecasting models aim to predict the movement of people from one place to another based on historical data and various social and economic factors. These models often face challenges due to the complexity and unpredictability of human behavior, especially in rapidly changing conditions. They may struggle to accurately estimate migration numbers, as seen in instances like the unexpected surge in European migration following the EU's 2004 expansion. It's important to recognize that these models have inherent limitations, particularly in situations where human behavior is difficult to predict with certainty.