PDF Summary:Getting to Zero, by Jayson Gaddis

Conflict is inevitable in human relationships, but it doesn't have to mean a breakdown in connection. In Getting to Zero, author Jayson Gaddis offers a framework for approaching conflict as an opportunity for growth and deepened intimacy.

Viewing conflict through a biological and psychological lens, Gaddis explores how our instinctual reactions and childhood experiences impact how we navigate disagreements. He then introduces practical tools like LUFU (Listen Until Felt Understood) and SHORE (Truthful Speech, Ownership, Repair, Empathy) to help shift from disconnection to mutual understanding. Armed with these strategies, readers can transform even the most challenging conflicts into catalysts for greater authenticity and strengthened bonds.

(continued)...

• In some situations, an "outside-in" approach might be necessary to establish boundaries or to address toxic or abusive behavior from others that cannot be managed by simply changing one's own thoughts and actions.
• While taking ownership of one's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors is important, it can be overly simplistic to assume that this alone will significantly impact relationships, as relationships are inherently co-created and involve the interplay of multiple individuals' actions and reactions.
• This approach may inadvertently dismiss the influence of external factors, such as cultural norms, societal pressures, or systemic issues, which can also play a significant role in relationship dynamics and outcomes.
• There is a risk that focusing on proactive behavior could lead to overstepping boundaries or being perceived as controlling, especially if the other person values autonomy or a more laid-back approach to relationship development.
• In some situations, the behavior of the other person may be objectively harmful or unacceptable, and it is reasonable to expect them to change such behavior as a precondition for a continued relationship.
• In certain professional contexts, such as therapy or coaching, influencing others towards positive change is not only acceptable but also the core of the practitioner's role.

Committing to Continuous Growth and Development

Gaddis argues that a key characteristic of leaders who focus on relationships is their commitment to continuous growth and learning. He encourages adopting a student mindset, embracing conflict as an opportunity to gain new insights and skills rather than a threat to be avoided. This involves seeking feedback, challenging our assumptions, and expanding our comfort zones to learn more effective ways of connecting with others.

Embracing Conflict as Opportunity, Not Avoidance

Gaddis encourages us to shift our mindset about conflict, viewing it as an opportunity for growth and connection rather than a threat to be avoided. He emphasizes that disagreements, when approached constructively, can reveal the gaps in understanding, challenge outdated beliefs, and enhance intimacy. Embracing conflict requires a willingness to be exposed and open, staying present with discomfort, as well as engaging in open and honest communication. Gaddis argues that this readiness to tackle challenges directly is essential in cultivating authentic connections and building more resilient, strengthened bonds.

Context

• Observations in nature show that conflict can lead to evolution and adaptation, suggesting that it plays a crucial role in development and survival.
• Challenging outdated beliefs through disagreement can lead to innovative solutions and creative problem-solving, as it encourages thinking outside conventional frameworks.
• Being present also involves being aware of nonverbal cues, such as body language and facial expressions, which can convey emotions and intentions that words might not fully express.
• In some cultures, direct confrontation is seen as a sign of respect and honesty, reinforcing the importance of addressing issues openly to maintain harmony and respect.

Adopting a Learner's Mindset to Improve Relationship Skills

Gaddis advocates for adopting a student mindset when facing conflict, emphasizing the importance of humility and openness to learning. Rather than defending our positions or clinging to the belief that we already know best, he encourages us to approach conflict as an opportunity to learn something new about ourselves, the other individual, and the dynamic between us. Asking questions, seeking feedback, and being receptive to different perspectives are key elements of a student mindset, fostering growth and understanding.

Other Perspectives

• While humility and openness to learning are valuable, they may not always be reciprocated, potentially leaving one party feeling exploited or unheard if the other party does not engage with the same mindset.
• There is a risk that framing all conflicts as learning opportunities could inadvertently minimize or dismiss the legitimate grievances and emotions of those involved.
• There is a risk that constantly seeking feedback and questioning one's own stance could lead to excessive self-doubt or a lack of confidence in one's own judgment.
• Relying too heavily on a student mindset could prevent individuals from asserting their needs and boundaries firmly when necessary.

Standing for Self, Others, and the Partnership

Gaddis introduces the concept of "Standing for Self, Other, and the Relationship" – a framework for approaching conflict that involves advocating not only for ourselves but also for the other individual and the bond as a whole. This approach prioritizes collaboration and understanding, recognizing that everyone has important principles and needs. By advocating for the "three," we create a space for connection and mutually beneficial solutions.

Balancing Your Needs, Others' Needs, and the Needs of the Relationship

Gaddis explains that "Standing for Three" requires a conscious balancing act, considering our own needs, the other person's needs, and those of the relationship itself. He emphasizes that neglecting any one of these components can lead to imbalance and distance. For example, prioritizing our needs while sacrificing someone else's can result in resentment and damage to the relationship. Conversely, continuously prioritizing other people's needs while neglecting our own can lead to feelings of resentment and a loss of self. Finding a harmonious balance between all three elements is key to building strong and rewarding connections.

Other Perspectives

• Some individuals or relationships may have a higher tolerance for imbalance and distance, viewing them as natural fluctuations rather than signs of a problem that needs to be addressed.
• Relationships are dynamic, and there may be phases where one partner's needs take precedence due to specific circumstances, without it necessarily harming the relationship.
• In some cultural or familial contexts, the collective well-being is valued over individual needs, and this can create a sense of belonging and satisfaction rather than resentment.
• The idea of balancing needs might lead to over-negotiation or excessive compromise, potentially causing individuals to lose sight of their core values or non-negotiable needs.

How Differences Strengthen Relationships

Gaddis disputes the common belief that "sameness" equals compatibility in romantic partnerships. He argues that it's our differing values, experiences, and perspectives that can strengthen relationships, offering opportunities for growth, learning, and deeper connection. Gaddis encourages us to embrace what makes us unique, viewing those as valuable assets that can enrich the relationship dynamic. By becoming effective communicators, negotiating collaboratively, and respecting one another's unique perspectives, we can harness the power of diversity to create a more durable and resilient relationship.

Context

• Relationships based on sameness can sometimes lead to echo chambers, where partners reinforce each other's views without challenge, potentially stunting personal and relational growth.
• Differences often include cultural backgrounds, which can enrich the relationship by introducing new traditions, languages, and customs, enhancing the couple's shared experiences.
• Engaging with a partner's unique traits can enhance empathy, as it requires understanding and valuing their distinct experiences and viewpoints.
• Effective communication helps partners articulate and align their goals and values, creating a shared vision that embraces their differences.
• By engaging in collaborative negotiation, partners can transform potential conflicts into opportunities for understanding and growth. This approach fosters trust and respect, as both parties feel heard and valued.
• Exposure to different perspectives can challenge personal biases and assumptions, promoting individual growth and self-awareness.
• Diverse relationships often develop greater resilience, as partners learn to support each other through varied life experiences and challenges.

Effective Listening, Communication, and Strategies for Managing Conflict

In this section, Gaddis introduces the core skills and techniques of the method Getting to Zero, which are LUFU and SHORE. He divides the processes into clear, actionable steps, empowering readers to put them into practice immediately. Gaddis also outlines common roadblocks that hinder effective communication and relationship repair, offering alternative strategies that promote understanding and collaboration. These roadblocks encompass unproductive coping mechanisms that often emerge during disputes, such as blame, avoidance, and defensiveness. Gaddis highlights the importance of regulating oneself, introspection, and a willingness to participate in collaborative problem-solving to overcome these roadblocks and achieve meaningful resolution.

The LUFU (Listen Until Felt Understood) Process

Gaddis introduces the LUFU (Listen Until Felt Understood) process as a powerful tool for enhancing communication and fostering understanding, especially in conflict situations. This involves a conscious shift from passive listening—waiting until it's our time to talk or defend ourselves—to active listening—engaging with genuine curiosity and intent to fully comprehend the experience of the other person. Gaddis emphasizes that when we truly feel understood, our defenses soften, our hearts open, and we experience increased safety and connection.

Develop Presence and Curiosity While Listening

Gaddis emphasizes the importance of developing mindfulness and curiosity as core foundations of effective listening. Presence involves focusing fully on the moment, engaging with the speaker both verbally and non-verbally, and attuning to their emotional state and intent. Curiosity requires setting aside our own assumptions and judgments and approaching the dialogue with a genuine desire to gain insight into the speaker's perspective. When we listen with presence and curiosity, we create a safe space for the speaker to feel heard, validated, and respected.

Other Perspectives

• The emphasis on mindfulness and curiosity may not address the potential for cultural differences in communication styles, where what constitutes effective listening can vary significantly.
• In some professional or cultural contexts, too much focus on non-verbal engagement or emotional attunement might be seen as inappropriate or invasive.
• The idea that curiosity requires setting aside all assumptions may overlook the role that informed assumptions can play in guiding focused and relevant inquiries.
• The concept of a "safe space" is subjective and can vary greatly from person to person; what one speaker finds safe, another might find stifling or patronizing.

Reflect, Validate, and Empathize to Make the Speaker Feel Heard

Gaddis provides specific techniques for using LUFU, emphasizing the importance of reflecting back to the speaker what we've heard, validating their feelings and experiences, and expressing empathy. Reflecting involves summarizing or paraphrasing the speaker's words to ensure we've accurately understood their message. Validation involves acknowledging the validity of their emotions and perspectives, regardless of whether we agree with their viewpoint. Expressing empathy involves attempting to understand and connect with their emotional state, demonstrating that we care about their experience.

Context

• LUFU stands for "Listen Until the Feeling is Understood," a communication technique aimed at deepening understanding and connection in conversations.
• Reflecting back helps reduce the chances of miscommunication, ensuring that both parties are on the same page and minimizing potential conflicts.
• Validation is particularly important in diverse settings, as it acknowledges and respects different cultural backgrounds and experiences, promoting inclusivity.
• Effective validation is part of active listening, which involves fully concentrating, understanding, and responding to the speaker, rather than passively hearing the words.
• Empathy differs from sympathy in that it involves sharing and understanding another's feelings rather than just feeling pity or sorrow for their situation.

SHORE (Truthful Speech, Ownership, Repair, Empathy) Process

Gaddis introduces the SHORE (Speak Honestly, Own, Repair, Empathize) process as a complementary tool to LUFU. This framework provides a structure for effectively expressing what we think, feel, and need, especially during disagreements, in a manner that promotes understanding and fosters connection.

Establishing Context and Syncing With Others

Gaddis emphasizes the importance of setting context and aligning with the other person before expressing our perspective. Establishing context involves clearly and respectfully stating our intention for the conversation, acknowledging the other person's feelings, and creating a shared understanding of the purpose of the discussion. Being in sync with them involves observing their non-verbal cues—body language, vocal intonation, facial expressions—to assess their emotional state and readiness to engage in the conversation.

Context

• This refers to the variation in pitch and tone of voice. A rising intonation might suggest a question or uncertainty, while a steady, calm tone can indicate confidence and clarity.

Other Perspectives

• Overemphasizing context can sometimes lead to unnecessary preamble, which might dilute the urgency or directness required in certain situations.
• There are situations where revealing the intention upfront could bias the conversation or cause the other person to become defensive.
• If the acknowledgment is not genuine or is perceived as patronizing, it could damage the relationship rather than enhance communication.
• Some discussions benefit from an emergent purpose, where the participants come together with an open agenda and allow the purpose to develop organically based on the direction of the conversation.
• In virtual or remote communication settings, non-verbal cues are often limited or absent, requiring reliance on other methods to sync with the other person.
• Overemphasis on assessing emotional readiness might delay important conversations that need to happen regardless of emotional state, especially in time-sensitive situations.

Embrace Your Role, Acknowledge Their Perspective, Request Adjustments

Gaddis outlines specific steps for practicing SHORE, starting with owning our role in the dispute. This involves owning our actions, words, and role in the dispute without defensiveness or justification. He encourages us to show empathy for how our actions have affected the other individual and affirm their perspective. Gaddis also highlights the importance of making clear and reasonable appeals for change, focusing on actions instead of personal qualities, and ensuring that the suggested modifications benefit both individuals and their partnership.

Context

• Creating an environment where individuals feel safe to own their role without fear of retribution or judgment is crucial for open and honest communication.
• By recognizing how your actions affect others, you can improve communication and strengthen relationships, leading to more effective and harmonious interactions.
• This can include paraphrasing their statements to show comprehension, acknowledging their emotions, and expressing appreciation for their willingness to share their viewpoint.
• Choose an appropriate time and setting for the conversation to ensure both parties are receptive and focused, which can enhance the effectiveness of the appeal.
• It fosters clearer communication by focusing on specific incidents or patterns, which can be more easily discussed and resolved.
• By focusing on mutual benefits, the risk of power imbalances is reduced, ensuring that neither party feels dominated or marginalized.

Navigating Common Barriers to Rebuilding Bonds

Gaddis outlines ten common "roadblocks" that hinder effective communication and reconnection during conflict: blame, apologies, distractions/avoidance, time, compartmentalization, FRACKing, hope and pray, defensiveness, stonewalling, and gaslighting. He explains how these strategies, while seemingly helpful in the short term, often exacerbate disagreements and prevent genuine resolution.

Unproductive Coping Mechanisms: Blame, Avoidance, Defensiveness

Gaddis explains how blame—assigning fault to others or ourselves—keeps us stuck in a victim mentality and prevents us from accepting responsibility and seeking solutions. Avoidance – using distractions or hoping that time will heal the wounds – allows conflicts to fester and build resentment. Defensiveness—shielding ourselves against vulnerability and receiving feedback—shuts down communication and hinders understanding.

Practical Tips

• Implement a "resentment audit" with close friends or family members every few months, where you openly discuss any simmering issues. This can be done over a casual coffee or a walk, creating a relaxed environment for honest communication. For example, if you've felt undervalued in your friend group, this is an opportunity to express your feelings and work together to improve the dynamic.
• Create a "No Defense Day" where you consciously refrain from defending yourself in conversations, instead focusing on understanding the other person's perspective. At the end of the day, reflect on how this affected your interactions and what you learned about yourself and others.

Practicing Acceptance, Regulating Yourself, and Collaborative Problem-Solving

Gaddis offers alternative strategies to overcome these roadblocks. He emphasizes the importance of practicing acceptance, acknowledging the reality of the situation and others' perspectives. Self-regulation, learning to manage our emotions and reactions, allows us to remain grounded and engage in constructive dialogue. Collaborative problem-solving involves working together as a team to find mutually beneficial solutions, recognizing that both individuals play a role in the conflict dynamic.

Other Perspectives

• In some cases, too much emphasis on acceptance could potentially lead to passivity or inaction when faced with unjust or harmful situations that require active opposition or change.
• Self-regulation can be challenging to achieve in high-stress situations, and not everyone may have the same capacity for emotional management, which could limit the effectiveness of this strategy.
• Finding mutually beneficial solutions implies that a compromise can always be reached, but some conflicts may involve zero-sum situations where the needs and goals of the parties are fundamentally opposed.

Navigating Specific Conflict Scenarios

This section provides guidance on navigating four specific types of conflicts commonly encountered in high-stakes relationships: disagreements and arguments about surface issues, childhood projections and attachment wounds, differences in values and divergent needs, and conflicts with resistant or uncooperative partners. The author encourages a deeper understanding of these conflict scenarios and promotes using the method's principles and resources to facilitate resolution and reconnection.

Disagreements and Arguments Over Superficial Matters

Gaddis explores the nature of "surface fights," the seemingly trivial disagreements about everyday matters that often erupt between partners. The author explains how these conflicts, although they seem to concern minor issues, often mask deeper problems.

Recognizing When Problems Are Under the Surface

Gaddis highlights the importance of recognizing when a surface argument is masking an underlying problem. He encourages us to notice the intensity of our reactions, considering whether they seem disproportionate to the triggering event. Often, these outsized reactions signal an underlying resentment, unaddressed hurt, or unmet need that must be addressed for genuine resolution.

Context

• Surface arguments might follow predictable patterns, such as defensiveness or blame, which can obscure deeper issues that need addressing.
• People may use defense mechanisms like projection or displacement, where they redirect their emotions from the original source of distress to a safer target, leading to seemingly irrational reactions.
• Techniques such as mediation or counseling can provide structured environments to explore and resolve underlying issues.

Addressing Underlying Resentments or Unmet Needs

Gaddis encourages us to dig deeper and explore the problems beneath surface fights. He suggests asking ourselves, "Why am I truly upset?" or "What need isn't fulfilled in this situation?" Once we identify the root cause, we can begin to address it directly using the strategies and methods of Gaddis's approach. This involves owning our part, expressing our feelings, validating the other person's experience, and seeking collaborative solutions that meet both individuals' needs and strengthen the relationship.

Context

• This process often involves psychological insight, where individuals reflect on past experiences that might influence current feelings and reactions.
• By asking why you're upset, you take personal responsibility for your emotions, which is a step towards empowerment and away from blaming others for your feelings.
• Various models, such as the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, provide frameworks for understanding and addressing unmet needs in conflicts.
• This involves acknowledging personal responsibility in a conflict. It means recognizing how one's actions, words, or attitudes may have contributed to the issue, which can help de-escalate tension and foster mutual understanding.
• Validation helps build trust in a relationship by demonstrating respect for the other person's feelings and perspectives, even if you don't agree with them.
• Successfully seeking collaborative solutions often requires a high level of emotional intelligence, including self-awareness, self-regulation, and empathy.

Childhood Projections and Attachment Wounds

Gaddis explores how unresolved early-life events and attachment wounds can influence our current relationships and conflicts. He explains that we typically, unconsciously, attribute qualities and behaviors of significant figures from our past onto those in our present lives. These projections can distort our perceptions, trigger emotional reactions, and create conflict patterns that mirror past relationship dynamics.

Understanding How Past Relationships Shape Today’s Challenges

Gaddis emphasizes the importance of understanding how our past relationships, particularly with our primary caregivers, shape the disputes we face now. He explains that insecure attachment patterns, stemming from inconsistent or neglectful caregiving, can lead to heightened sensitivity to rejection, abandonment fears, and difficulty dealing with conflict constructively. Recognizing these patterns in us, we’re able to begin separating our past experiences from present interactions, responding more skillfully to others rather than reacting to a projected image.

Practical Tips

• Engage in a daily mindfulness exercise focused on attachment and self-soothing. Mindfulness can help you become more aware of your emotional state and provide you with tools to calm yourself when you're feeling anxious about relationships. A simple exercise might involve deep breathing while visualizing a place or memory that makes you feel secure and loved, reinforcing the idea that you can provide yourself with feelings of security.
• Create a visual timeline of your life to separate past and present experiences. Draw a line on a large sheet of paper and mark significant past events with symbols or pictures. As you encounter new situations, add them to the timeline and visually compare if they are truly new or if they're being influenced by past experiences. This can help you see patterns and differentiate between the two.

Perspective-Taking and Compassion for Others' Experiences

Gaddis encourages us to practice perspective-taking and compassion when navigating conflicts rooted in childhood projections. This involves recognizing that the other party also brings their own history, wounds, and triggers to the relationship, influencing their reactions. By attempting to understand their perspective and affirm their experience, although we may not agree with their behaviors, we create space for empathy and connection, fostering more collaborative conflict resolution.

Other Perspectives

• Compassion fatigue can occur when one consistently tries to empathize with others, potentially leading to burnout and a decreased capacity to effectively manage conflicts.
• The process of constantly considering others' backgrounds can be emotionally taxing and may not always be practical or necessary for resolving every conflict or interaction.
• While understanding others' perspectives can foster empathy, it may not always lead to connection, especially if the differences in perspectives are too vast or if one party is not open to connecting.

Value Differences and Divergent Needs

Gaddis explores the challenges of navigating conflicts that arise from having different values and divergent needs in relationships. He explains that values—deeply held beliefs that guide our decisions and behavior—are often non-negotiable, creating tension when they clash with the values of those we care about.

Identifying Core Principles and Finding Alignment

Gaddis encourages us to clarify our fundamental principles and comprehend the other party's. This involves reflecting on what matters most to us, what guides our decisions, and how our values might differ from the other person's. He suggests trying the compass activity to map out both individuals' values and identify areas of alignment and divergence.

Other Perspectives

• In multicultural or diverse settings, what is considered a fundamental principle may vary greatly, and the attempt to clarify them could inadvertently highlight divisions rather than promote alignment.
• There may be situations where the other party's principles are fundamentally at odds with one's own ethical or moral standards, making alignment or compromise inappropriate or even harmful.
• Reflecting on what matters most to us can sometimes lead to a self-centered approach, where one might prioritize personal values over the well-being of others or the larger community.
• Some decisions are made collectively, in groups or organizations, where individual reflection on personal guiding principles may not be as relevant or effective in understanding the decision-making process.
• This approach could potentially lead to overemphasis on differences rather than common ground, which might hinder finding a resolution or compromise.
• The activity might not account for the dynamic nature of values, which can evolve over time and be influenced by new experiences.
• Focusing on alignment and divergence might oversimplify complex value systems into binary categories, potentially overlooking the nuances and contexts that give those values meaning.

Negotiating Differences to Benefit the Relationship

Gaddis emphasizes the importance of negotiating differing values to benefit the relationship. This involves recognizing that both individuals' values are valid, despite any differences, and seeking creative solutions that honor both perspectives. He encourages focusing on finding "win-win" solutions that address both individuals' needs, recognizing that compromise and flexibility are often necessary to progress together.

Other Perspectives

• The concept of all values being valid can be problematic in a situation where values are based on misinformation or prejudice.
• The process of seeking creative solutions can be time-consuming and may not be practical in situations where quick decision-making is necessary.
• Emphasizing "win-win" solutions could discourage individuals from learning how to gracefully accept loss or handle situations where not everyone can get what they want.
• In certain situations, progress might be better achieved through assertiveness and maintaining clear boundaries rather than compromising, especially in matters of principle or safety.

Resistant or Uncooperative Partners

Gaddis addresses the challenge of dealing with partners who are resistant or uncooperative when resolving conflicts. He acknowledges the frustration and pain that arise when our efforts to restore a connection are met with defensiveness, avoidance, or a refusal to engage in the process.

Making Practical Requests for Changes in Conduct

Gaddis emphasizes the importance of making clear and feasible appeals for shifts in behavior when dealing with resistant partners. These requests should focus on specific actions instead of personality traits, be feasible and achievable, and benefit both individuals and their partnership. He encourages us to express our needs assertively while respecting the autonomy of others, recognizing that we cannot force them to change.

Other Perspectives

• Clear and feasible requests may not always lead to behavior changes if the underlying issues are not addressed.
• Focusing solely on actions without considering the personality traits driving those actions might lead to superficial changes that do not last.
• While expressing needs assertively is important, it can sometimes be misinterpreted as aggression or insensitivity, which may lead to increased resistance or conflict.
• In certain contexts, such as legal or disciplinary settings, change in conduct can be mandated and enforced, thus effectively being "forced" upon individuals.

Acceptance and Closure When Others Refuse to Change

Gaddis encourages us to practice acceptance when dealing with partners who refuse to compromise. This involves acknowledging their resistance, releasing the expectation that we can change them, and focusing on what is within our control: our own responses and decisions. He suggests exploring what might be gained from the conflict, even in the absence of the other person's participation, recognizing that we can learn and grow from challenging experiences.

This section also focuses on strategies for achieving closure when others resolutely refuse to resolve conflicts. Gaddis recommends a combination of self-regulation, self-reflection, and seeking guidance from external resources, such as therapists or coaches, to process the emotional impact of the unresolved conflict, find significance in the experience, and move forward with clarity and resilience. Gaddis encourages readers to come to terms with the other person's unwillingness to change and focus on what they can control: their own actions, reactions, and choices, to achieve a sense of closure.

Other Perspectives

• Focusing solely on acceptance could prevent individuals from seeking out more compatible partners who are willing to compromise and meet them halfway.
• In some relationships, mutual change and compromise are essential for growth and sustainability; thus, the idea of unilaterally releasing the expectation of change might not be conducive to a balanced partnership.
• While focusing on our responses and decisions is important, it can sometimes lead to self-blame or an exaggerated sense of responsibility for situations that are influenced by external factors beyond our control.
• This approach could inadvertently reinforce a sense of isolation or disconnection, as it doesn't involve collaborative problem-solving.
• Some individuals may experience a sense of stagnation or regression after a challenging experience, rather than growth.
• The concept of closure is subjective and can sometimes be an elusive goal; some individuals may find that acceptance without closure is a more realistic and healthy approach.
• External resources like therapists or coaches may not always provide the desired help or may not be a good fit for the individual's specific needs, leading to frustration or a sense of wasted effort.
• Processing the emotional impact of unresolved conflict might not always lead to closure or peace of mind; in some cases, it could potentially lead to rumination and increased distress.
• The concept of moving forward might imply a one-size-fits-all approach, disregarding the unique cultural, social, and personal factors that influence how individuals deal with unresolved conflicts.
• The idea of coming to terms with someone's unwillingness to change assumes that change is always the other person's responsibility, which may overlook the possibility that both parties might need to make adjustments.