PDF Summary:Conflict, by David Petraeus and Andrew Roberts

The way we wage war has transformed dramatically over the last half-century, driven by the rise of nuclear deterrents, the collapse of colonial empires, and rapid technological progress. In this book, David Petraeus and Andrew Roberts examine these profound shifts and the challenges they present for military strategy and tactics.

The advent of nuclear armaments and the doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction changed the calculation for superpowers. Meanwhile, the fight against guerrilla insurgencies demanded new counterinsurgency approaches. The authors analyze conflicts like Vietnam to draw lessons in navigating complex local dynamics. They also explore how emerging technologies, from precision munitions to AI systems, stand to revolutionize conventional warfare and the future battlefield.

(continued)...

The lessons learned from the Vietnam war are pertinent to future operations aimed at quelling insurgencies.

The writers argue that despite the unfortunate outcome of the Vietnam conflict, it provided valuable lessons. The writers emphasize the importance of integrating lessons learned from historical conflicts into strategies devised for tackling insurgencies and related difficulties in the times ahead.

Understanding the local settings deeply, which includes the cultural, historical, and political elements, is crucial, as is grasping the nature of the adversaries.

The authors stress the vital need to thoroughly understand the surrounding environment when engaging in counterinsurgency operations. Understanding the historical, cultural, political, religious, and social factors, along with the objectives and desires of the conflicting parties, is crucial in formulating an appropriate strategy. The authors stress that the outcomes of the Vietnam conflict were frequently detrimental, stemming from the U.S. military's insufficient holistic understanding.

Ensuring the continuation of intricate and expensive global endeavors necessitates garnering support from the populace and avoiding the broadening of goals.

The authors emphasize the necessity of securing popular backing for global interventions. The erosion of support from the American public for the Vietnam conflict, as the authors imply, was influenced by the expansion of objectives and the stretching of operational boundaries beyond the original commitments, especially when these objectives were ambiguous, contributing to the mission's inability to triumph. It is essential to have a well-defined and concise goal that can be easily conveyed to the public, which includes an understanding of the possible expenses, challenges, and mistakes, as well as an acknowledgment that the effort may necessitate a significant amount of time. The Vietnam conflict stands as a stark warning to leaders against making hasty and overly optimistic declarations of victory.

Other Perspectives

• The complexity of counterinsurgency may not solely be derived from local nuances but also from broader geopolitical dynamics and international policies.
• Some historians and military analysts argue that there were successes within the Vietnam War strategies that are often overshadowed by the overall negative outcome.
• "Search and destroy" operations, while criticized, were part of a broader array of tactics, and some argue they were necessary given the military context and intelligence at the time.
• The traditional warfare approach of the U.S. Army has been effective in other conflicts, suggesting that the issue in Vietnam may have been more about misapplication rather than the approach itself.
• The effectiveness of the Marine Corps Combined Action Program is debated; some argue that its success was too localized to be considered a viable alternative strategy for the entire war.
• The role of the host-nation government's corruption is complex, and some argue that the U.S. could have taken different approaches to mitigate this issue rather than simply viewing it as a complicating factor.
• The necessity of dependable partners and diplomatic efforts, while important, may not always be feasible, and some argue that there should be strategies in place for when such partnerships are not possible.
• The lessons from Vietnam, while valuable, may not be universally applicable to all future counterinsurgency operations due to changing warfare technology and political landscapes.
• A deep understanding of local settings is important, but overemphasis on cultural and historical elements can lead to neglecting other strategic or tactical considerations.
• Public support for global interventions is important, but there are instances where strategic decisions must be made regardless of public opinion, especially in matters of national security.

The latter part of the 20th century and the onset of the 21st have seen significant changes in the nature of conflict, including shifts in how strategic commands are carried out, the obstacles faced by conventional military units, and the rise of unconventional methods of warfare.

The authors explore the progression of conflict in modern times. This chapter delves into the evolving dynamics of warfare, examining the transformation of strategic leadership roles, the difficulties faced by conventional armed forces when engaging with determined irregular adversaries, and the growing use of unconventional tactics to contest the supremacy of Western nations.

As contemporary military conflicts become more complex, so too does the need for strategic leadership.

Petraeus and Roberts emphasize that the ability of nations to employ their militaries successfully is increasingly a matter of strategy, and that strategic thinking requires effective leadership. The approach entails devising an all-encompassing plan that acknowledges the different components and stakeholders, followed by the commencement and orchestration of complex maneuvers to implement the plan.

The importance of being adaptable, maintaining transparent communication, and possessing thorough oversight and understanding is crucial for success in the intricate sphere of modern warfare.

The authors stress the importance of leaders being flexible, conveying their messages effectively, and possessing an overarching view and control within the complex and ever-changing environments of military engagements. A leader must have an inherent understanding of the dynamic nature of warfare and the mental flexibility to adapt their approach in accordance with shifts in the situation and surroundings. Conveying information effectively to those below, above, and all involved parties is of paramount importance. Leaders must not only foster a culture that encourages inspiration, motivation, discipline, and trust but also manage the practicalities to guarantee the successful implementation of the strategic plan.

The intricacies of coordinating multinational coalitions with military units and governmental agencies.

The authors stress that overseeing global partnerships is fraught with significant challenges. Each country will have its own motivations, risks, thresholds and limits. The governments of nations that receive support from the coalition often present challenges of greater significance. The authors stress the importance of effective leadership, highlighting the necessity for cooperation with various governments and partners, despite potential discrepancies in interests, priorities, and methods compared to the group's collective objectives.

Conventional armed forces frequently encounter substantial challenges when confronting determined irregular military groups.

The book explores the complex difficulties encountered in military engagements with unconventional adversaries such as guerrilla fighters, insurgents, criminals, and terrorists, who often exhibit a greater willingness to sustain casualties within their ranks in pursuit of victory, exceeding the level of loss that Western nations usually tolerate. Moreover, these factions leverage modern technological advancements by harnessing readily available weaponry, tapping into communication networks, and spreading propaganda and misinformation to voice their grievances, while simultaneously conducting activities in multiple domains to undermine the adversary's ability to sustain conflict.

The struggle against insurgent groups intensifies when they find sanctuary in so-called "secure" zones and as public backing wanes.

The authors contend that insurgent groups pose a particularly difficult challenge when they secure support from the communities in which they operate, avoid engaging directly with conventional military forces, take sanctuary in neighboring territories, and obtain vital support from benefactors. The strategies employed by the Vietcong and the Taliban illustrate the ways in which different factors erode support for counterinsurgency campaigns within a nation and bolster the resolve of insurgent factions to engage in prolonged struggles designed to exhaust an external opponent.

The concept of hybrid warfare introduces challenges that impact not only military strategies but also civilian domains.

The writers highlight the progression of warfare that combines different elements, which now encompasses not only traditional battlefields such as land, sea, air, and space but also extends to economic strategies, diplomatic efforts, intelligence gathering, and shaping the views of the populace. Opponents who do not possess the means for outright military engagement can undermine the morale, cohesion, and determination of their traditional adversaries and interfere with their activities through the use of hybrid warfare.

Asymmetric warfare has become more common as a counter to the West's dominance in conventional military capabilities.

The authors' examination indicates that the advanced martial prowess of the United States and its NATO allies as the 20th century concluded and the 21st commenced has incited adversaries to adopt strategies of irregular warfare. The tactics used generally seek to take advantage of weaknesses within the decision-making processes of Western nations, which hinders their ability to sustain extended commitments.

Utilizing unconventional tactics and tools to undermine Western dominance, which includes engaging in terrorism and leveraging economic as well as foreign relations influence.

The authors highlight the complexity of modern conflict strategies, which are characterized by a combination of methods including cyber attacks on various sectors, undermining financial systems, and the provision of support to proxy groups. In some scenarios, nations might possess the power to control vital resources, thus impeding a rival's ability to sustain military operations or to significantly unsettle its overall economic health, influencing the strategic decisions it undertakes.

Our approach should be adaptable and inventive to deter opponents from threatening the current international system.

The Western allies, including the United States, must anticipate complex strategic maneuvers and develop strong countermeasures. This involves addressing all aspects of the strategy, which includes strengthening robust infrastructure and providing assistance in areas such as education, economic development, and defense aid for countries susceptible to political instability. The authors argue that societies founded on democratic values must prevail against entities dedicated to spreading misinformation and disrupting critical conversations on essential issues.

Other Perspectives

• While strategic leadership is important, it can be argued that the emphasis on leadership may overshadow the equally critical role of grassroots innovation and the adaptability of individual soldiers on the ground.
• Adaptability and transparent communication are indeed crucial, but overemphasis on these aspects can sometimes lead to a lack of decisiveness and a slower response time in critical situations.
• The complexity of coordinating multinational coalitions is acknowledged, but this point of view might understate the potential for such coalitions to act effectively due to shared strategic interests or common threats.
• The challenges conventional armed forces face against irregular military groups are well-documented, but this perspective may not fully recognize the advancements and adaptations made by conventional forces to counter such threats.
• The narrative about insurgent groups finding sanctuary and public backing could be complemented by acknowledging instances where counterinsurgency efforts have been successful due to effective military strategy and winning the "hearts and minds" of the local population.
• The concept of hybrid warfare is presented as a new challenge, but one could argue that elements of hybrid warfare have been present throughout history and that current military doctrines are evolving to address these challenges.
• The use of asymmetric warfare to counter Western dominance might be critiqued by pointing out that such strategies are not always successful and can lead to international isolation or retaliation against the weaker party.
• The focus on unconventional tactics to undermine Western dominance might overlook the resilience and adaptability of Western societies and their ability to innovate in the face of new types of threats.
• The call for adaptable and inventive approaches to deter threats to the international system may not consider the potential for overextension and the need to balance international commitments with domestic priorities.

The ongoing struggle between Russia and Ukraine exemplifies the changing nature of warfare, challenging traditional military power and highlighting the complex difficulties in creating and sustaining stability in areas beset by strife.

The confrontation that escalated following the onset of hostilities between Ukraine and Russia in February 2022 has become a significant event in the period following the Cold War. The book provides a comprehensive examination of the conflict, highlighting the contrast between Russia's employment of conventional warfare techniques from the previous century and Ukraine's implementation of modern technologies and strategies. The chapter explores the intricate process of restoring peace and equilibrium in countries following the cessation of military conflicts.

The ongoing hostilities between Russia and Ukraine emphasize the enduring importance of traditional military capabilities.

Petraeus and Roberts delve into a broad spectrum of insights derived from the ongoing strife in Ukraine, acquiring knowledge that surpasses the usual confines of armed conflict. They underscore the significance of traditional land warfare capabilities at a time when sophisticated technologies are integrated into all facets of military engagements. The authors highlight the swift evolution of warfare, despite the appearance of static front lines, as seen in the Donbas area.

The presence of sophisticated weaponry, cohesive tactical strategies, skilled command at various levels, and strong structural and supervisory systems is crucial.

The authors argue that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine underscores the enduring importance of traditional military units skilled in synchronized combat maneuvers, which remain vital in intense warfare situations, despite advancements in drone technology and the heightened lethality and precision of modern armaments. The authors emphasize that the key to success lies in meticulous preparation, adept logistics management, and the caliber and efficiency of leadership and command systems. The work by Roberts and Petraeus provides numerous specific examples that highlight the Russian military's deficiencies in basic tactical maneuvers, which are primarily a result of a strict command structure, low soldier morale, and widespread corruption.

The significant impact of motivated civilians on the country's path and the advantages gained by those defending their homeland.

The writers argue that the ongoing strife in Ukraine highlights the enduring importance of morale and strong national leadership. The people of Ukraine showed extraordinary courage, determination, inventiveness, enthusiasm, resourcefulness, and valor, significantly motivated by President Zelensky's leadership, who has shown outstanding skill in understanding the wider strategic situation, conveying the vision to the citizens of Ukraine and the global audience, acting as a personal model and a source of energy to inspire his country, and constantly adapting strategies to respond to the evolving circumstances of the conflict. The authors contend that Ukraine's resilience has notably increased during Zelensky's tenure.

The challenges of founding a nation and maintaining stability in the aftermath of conflict.

The authors highlight the many challenges of nation-building in the contemporary world, particularly in countries and regions with a history of conflict. The authors contend that to surmount these challenges, it is essential to not only rebuild the tangible infrastructure but also to strategically station military forces to protect the local population.

Tackling the fallout from unethical actions and widespread dissatisfaction, as well as the decline of communal structures

Roberts underscore the critical roles that foundational development plays in stabilizing and rebuilding societies post-conflict. This involves not only addressing the basic needs of the citizens but also rebuilding critical infrastructure, fostering effective governance, ensuring justice and compliance with the rule of law, creating bodies to provide necessary services, revitalizing the economy, and addressing the root political and social causes that resulted in the conflict. The authors stress that widespread corruption often undermines attempts to establish a stable, democratic government and a thriving economy in Afghanistan, impeding the initiatives undertaken by American and coalition forces.

Addressing the challenges posed by external entities seeking to capitalize on instability.

Petraeus and Roberts note that chaos often attracts the interest of outside entities, who might try to exploit the situation to their advantage. Pakistan protected these militant groups, which were in opposition to the United States and the Afghan administration after the fall of the Taliban, perceiving strategic advantages in doing so, while Moscow's engagement in Syria to bolster a struggling ally for various reasons is indicative of this pattern.

The advancement of artificial intelligence and cutting-edge technology is leading to the creation of systems that can operate independently, which is transforming the conventional approach to warfare.

The confrontation between Ukraine and Russia has underscored the increasing importance of unmanned aerial vehicles and autonomous technologies in upcoming military conflicts. The authors contend that swift advancements in artificial intelligence and robotics are pivotal in transforming military strategies, which in turn affects the results of conflicts.

Establishing robust protections against emerging deadly technologies, including autonomous groups of drones, cyber assaults, and advanced rapid-fire arms that can strike with high accuracy.

The authors assert that it is imperative for military forces to initiate the creation of defenses against emerging deadly technologies. This includes, for example, the ability to disrupt the command and control systems that enable large drone swarms and prevent the use of these by adversaries. The evolution of cyber warfare demands the development of mechanisms that can foresee, monitor, and neutralize opponents in these evolving arenas of conflict. Nations must create cunning plans that incorporate elements of dispersal and misdirection to safeguard and ensure the resilience of their armed forces.

To ensure that warfare conducted in times ahead adheres to ethical and moral standards, it is essential to maintain human oversight and awareness regarding the control systems, thereby avoiding unintentional escalation.

Petraeus and Roberts emphasize the importance of human supervision over robotic technologies and armaments. It is important to thoughtfully evaluate the potential for these mechanisms to rapidly escalate and produce unexpected results. The authors stress the necessity of establishing rules for interaction and limits, while also making certain that humans are able to monitor the actions of AI systems and maintain command of their operations, thus remaining involved and in a position of oversight. Should we fail to achieve this, the peril to humankind arises from conflicts waged by self-operating machinery devoid of ethical guidance, empathy, reason, or a true appreciation for the complexities and unpredictable consequences inherent in war.

Other Perspectives

• While traditional military capabilities are important, the effectiveness of asymmetric warfare tactics, such as cyber warfare, information operations, and guerrilla tactics, can sometimes offset the advantages of conventional forces.
• Sophisticated weaponry and tactics are crucial, but the human element, including the morale and adaptability of forces, can be equally decisive in conflict outcomes.
• The impact of motivated civilians is significant, but external support in terms of international alliances, economic aid, and diplomatic pressure can also play a pivotal role in the defense of a homeland.
• Nation-building is a complex process, and the imposition of external models of governance and economic systems may not always be suitable or sustainable in different cultural and historical contexts.
• While addressing the fallout from unethical actions is necessary, overly punitive measures can sometimes exacerbate divisions and hinder reconciliation efforts.
• External entities can indeed exploit instability, but international intervention can also be a force for good, providing peacekeeping forces, humanitarian aid, and support for democratic institutions.
• The advancement of AI and autonomous systems in warfare presents new challenges, but it also offers opportunities for reducing casualties and increasing precision in conflict.
• Robust protections against emerging technologies are essential, but there is also a need for international agreements on the use of such technologies to prevent an arms race and ensure global security.
• Human oversight of autonomous systems is crucial, but there may also be scenarios where the speed and complexity of warfare necessitate a level of autonomy beyond direct human control, requiring new frameworks for accountability and decision-making.