PDF Summary:Cave of Bones, by Lee Berger and John Hawks

Cave of Bones by Lee Berger and John Hawks unravels the remarkable discovery of Homo naledi fossils in South Africa's Rising Star cave system. The book details the challenges of unearthing these ancient remains from a remote chamber only accessible by squeezing through narrow passages.

As they examine Homo naledi's unique traits, the authors explore the species' place in human evolution. The fossils, dated to be much younger than expected, suggest Homo naledi coexisted with early Homo sapiens. Discoveries like potential burial sites, tools, and symbolic engravings raise thought-provoking questions about the cognitive capabilities of our extinct relatives.

(continued)...

Practical Tips

• Start a conversation club with friends or colleagues where each person shares an aspect of themselves that doesn't fit the usual categories people are placed in. This could be a hobby, belief, or habit that doesn't align with their job, age, or other societal roles. This practice encourages the recognition and acceptance of diverse and unconventional traits within your social circle.
• Start a journal to document your physical and behavioral traits, noting which ones could be evolutionary adaptations. For example, you might have a strong immune response to certain allergens, which could be an evolutionary trait passed down from ancestors who survived in environments where those allergens were present.
• Enhance your understanding of primitive traits by observing and comparing primate behaviors at a local zoo or wildlife sanctuary. Pay attention to how primates like chimpanzees or gorillas use tools, socialize, and solve problems. Take notes on behaviors that seem primitive or complex, and reflect on how these observations might relate to early hominins like Homo naledi and their connection to other species.
• Create a visual timeline of human evolution for your home or office using online resources to print images and descriptions of different Homo species, including Homo naledi. Place them in chronological order to visualize the progression of human evolution, which can serve as a daily reminder of our species' journey and the place of recent discoveries in that history.
• Participate in citizen science projects that contribute to paleoanthropology. Look for online platforms like Zooniverse, which often have projects where volunteers can help classify images of fossils or ancient artifacts. By participating, you'll contribute to the scientific understanding of human evolution and gain a deeper appreciation for the meticulous work involved in this field.

Comparative studies have examined the distinctive physical traits of Homo naledi in relation to its hominin kin.

The physical traits of Homo naledi, such as elongated legs, a narrow pelvis, and human-like feet, suggest it was adept at bipedal locomotion.

The bone framework of Homo naledi provided crucial insights into its locomotion and its relationship with other members of the hominin family. The authors emphasize the remarkable similarity between the lower limbs of Homo naledi and those of modern humans. The configuration of its elongated thigh and shin bones, coupled with a narrow midsection and feet that bear a similarity to human ones, characterized by distinct arches and a large toe aligned with the remaining toes, suggested an adeptness at bipedal locomotion.

The evolutionary adaptations indicate that these creatures had reduced reliance on tree-dwelling behaviors and less necessity for climbing than their early Australopithecine forebears. Hawks suggests that the bone structure of Homo naledi indicates a walking style that was efficient and closely resembled that of humans, possibly enabling them to cover large areas with minimal energy expenditure. Bipedal locomotion likely played a crucial role in the adaptation of Homo naledi to the varied landscapes of southern Africa, which may have contributed to its extensive distribution and survival in a challenging environment.

Practical Tips

• Explore your own bipedal efficiency by tracking your steps and posture with a wearable device. By monitoring your daily step count, stride length, and posture, you can gain insights into your walking efficiency. Compare your data over time to see if changes in your routine, such as incorporating more walking or different types of exercise, impact your bipedal movement.
• Explore your own movement patterns by keeping a movement diary for a week to observe how often you engage in climbing or elevated activities versus ground-level activities. Note down every instance where you climb stairs, use a ladder, or reach for high shelves, and compare these to how much time you spend walking, sitting, or engaging in activities on a single level. This self-observation can provide insight into how your lifestyle aligns with our ancestors' shift from arboreal to terrestrial living.
• Start a regular practice of balance and agility exercises. Incorporating activities like yoga, Pilates, or balance board workouts into your routine can help you understand and improve the physical traits that bipedalism enhances, such as core strength and coordination. This personal application can give you a deeper appreciation for the evolutionary steps that have allowed humans to navigate complex environments.

The arched fingers, among other traits, indicated a capacity for climbing in Homo naledi, revealing a level of movement versatility not seen in later human predecessors.

Homo naledi's lower extremities were unmistakably evolved for bipedal locomotion, but they also suggested a capacity for a more diverse set of movements, implying that climbing was still an important part of their behavior. The writers detail the species' notably elongated and arched digits, traits typically linked to primates skilled in arboreal navigation. Homo naledi possessed unique traits that suited it for bipedal locomotion as well as arboreal activities, suggesting a specialized ecological role that involved traversing both terrestrial and arboreal environments.

Hawks proposes that these traits suggest the presence of an entity with the capacity for a broader range of motion and greater adaptability than previously believed, indicating a more flexible style of movement. The versatility of Homo naledi was likely a key factor in its success, allowing it to inhabit not only the vast savannas but also the wooded or rocky areas within South Africa.

Practical Tips

• Start a simple finger strength training routine using grip strengtheners or stress balls. This can help you relate to the concept of arched fingers and their role in climbing. As you work on your grip, consider how the structure of your own fingers aids in this activity and compare it to the evolutionary adaptations of Homo naledi.
• Engage with interactive exhibits at science museums or through augmented reality (AR) apps that simulate the walking patterns of extinct hominins. By virtually stepping into the footsteps of Homo naledi, you can experience firsthand the differences and similarities in bipedal movement, fostering a connection to our evolutionary past.
• Participate in a hand modeling clay or pottery class to experiment with the intricacies of hand movements and the control required to manipulate materials, drawing a parallel to the fine motor skills that Homo naledi's hand structure might have provided. This can help you appreciate the evolutionary advantages of hand dexterity in a creative and tangible way.
• Create a playful obstacle course in your backyard or local park that requires both ground navigation and climbing. Use natural features like trees, rocks, and slopes to challenge your body in various ways, promoting agility and strength similar to what might have been required for Homo naledi's mixed locomotion.
• Explore different environments to challenge your adaptability skills. Take up hobbies that require you to adapt to new settings, such as hiking in various terrains, rock climbing, or even urban exploration. These activities will push you to adapt both mentally and physically, mirroring the adaptability that Homo naledi would have needed.
• Engage in a creative writing exercise where you imagine a day in the life of Homo naledi, transitioning through savanna, wooded, and rocky landscapes. Write about the challenges and opportunities each environment presents, and how Homo naledi might use their physical and mental abilities to navigate them. This activity can enhance your empathy and understanding of the species' versatility and survival strategies.

The fossils of Homo naledi play a pivotal role in understanding the timeline of human evolutionary history, specifically regarding their period of existence and their age.

Determining the age of the Homo naledi fossils initially posed a significant challenge.

Traditional methods used to determine the age of fossilized remains were frequently inadequate in establishing the antiquity of finds like Homo naledi.

The researchers faced significant obstacles in determining the age of the Homo naledi fossils. Initially, it was not feasible to ascertain the age of the findings. The writers describe how conventional techniques to ascertain the antiquity of artifacts, such as employing radiocarbon that depends on the consistent diminution of carbon-14 isotopes, have a restricted scope of use. Radiocarbon dating yields age estimations for artifacts up to about 50,000 years old, beyond which the remaining carbon-14 is too sparse to produce reliable results.

Context

• Homo naledi is a species of hominin discovered in the Rising Star Cave system in South Africa. The fossils were first announced in 2015, and their discovery has provided significant insights into human evolution.
• The dating process often requires collaboration between paleontologists, geologists, and other scientists to cross-verify results using different methods and perspectives.
• The half-life of carbon-14 is approximately 5,730 years, which limits its effectiveness to relatively recent history in geological terms.
• The process involves measuring the amount of carbon-14 remaining in a sample and comparing it to the expected initial amount in a living organism. This comparison helps determine how many half-lives have passed since the organism's death, thus estimating its age.

Researchers had to apply a range of more complex dating techniques, including uranium-series dating and electron spin resonance, to constrain the age of the fossils.

Berger and Hawks, confronting the limitations inherent in radiocarbon dating, utilized a comprehensive set of sophisticated methods to determine the age of the Homo naledi remains. The methods used included measuring the decay of uranium isotopes and applying a technique that determines the accumulation of electrons trapped in materials like tooth enamel, which is identified as electron spin resonance (ESR).

The scientific team employed multiple chronological techniques on the skeletal remains and surrounding strata to pinpoint the era linked to the Homo naledi remains. Our understanding of the species' place within the broad timeline of human development was significantly improved by this meticulous approach.

Context

• ESR dating is particularly useful for dating tooth enamel and other crystalline materials. It measures the number of trapped electrons accumulated over time due to natural radiation, allowing scientists to estimate the age of the sample.
• This method involves measuring the decay of uranium isotopes into thorium in calcium carbonate materials, such as bones or cave formations. It is useful for dating objects ranging from about 1,000 to 500,000 years old.
• The study of rock layers (strata) and layering (stratification) is used to understand the geological context of fossil finds. This helps in correlating the age of the fossils with the surrounding sedimentary layers.
• Establishing an accurate age for Homo naledi is crucial because it helps scientists understand where this species fits in the evolutionary timeline, especially in relation to other hominins like Homo sapiens and Homo erectus.

The finding that the Homo naledi remains were of a much younger age than initially assumed came as a surprise.

The fossilized remnants of Homo naledi have been conclusively dated to a period ranging from 236,000 to 335,000 years in the past, during the era that aligns with the initial emergence of anatomically modern humans in Africa.

The authors detail the surprising results that emerged after examining the age data. The Homo naledi fossils were ultimately estimated to be between 236,000 and 335,000 years old, significantly younger than what would have been expected based on their primitive morphology. During the Middle Pleistocene, an era marked by significant shifts in climate, the terrain was concurrently inhabited by a variety of hominin species, including the emergence of Homo sapiens, alongside the species known as Homo naledi.

Practical Tips

• Start a fossil-themed art project to appreciate the ancient world through a creative lens. Gather materials like clay, paint, and paper to create fossil imprints or sculptures that represent what life might have looked like when the fossils were formed. This hands-on activity can deepen your connection to the past and provide a visual representation of the time scale discussed.
• Enhance your appreciation for the Middle Pleistocene fossils by visiting local museums with paleontological exhibits. Before you go, read up on the specific fossils that were found from that era so you can identify them in the museum. This firsthand experience can provide a tangible connection to the era and deepen your interest in the subject.
• Enhance your garden's resilience to climate change by planting species that thrived during the Middle Pleistocene era. Research plants that are known to have existed during that time and are suitable for your region's current climate. By incorporating these into your garden, you can create a living exhibit of historical climate adaptation and contribute to biodiversity.
• Enhance your understanding of ancient habitats by building a small-scale model of the Middle Pleistocene terrain using natural materials and craft supplies. Gather information about the type of environment these hominin species inhabited, including the flora, fauna, and geological features. Use clay, stones, plants, and other materials to recreate the terrain, which will give you a tangible sense of the challenges and opportunities these early humans faced.

Other Perspectives

• The assumption that primitive morphology must equate to an older age could be challenged by the possibility of evolutionary stasis or the existence of isolated populations that change very little over long periods.

The finding suggests that Homo naledi coexisted on the African terrain alongside other early hominin species, challenging the once accepted notion that our forebears were the sole representatives of the hominin lineage in Africa at that time.

The realization that the fossils of Homo naledi are younger than previously believed has profoundly changed our understanding of the timeline of human evolution. Homo naledi, characterized by a blend of both archaic and more developed characteristics and a diminutive brain, coexisted with the initial Homo sapiens in Africa. The discovery of these remains prompted a reassessment of the traditional view of human evolution as a linear progression, contesting the notion that our forebears, who had smaller brains and more ape-like characteristics, belonged solely to a distant past.

The co-occurrence of Homo naledi and Homo sapiens during a critical period of human evolutionary history raises questions about their possible interactions and the role of brain size and configuration in the development of sophisticated behaviors.

Other Perspectives

• The presence of Homo naledi alongside other hominins does not necessarily challenge the idea of our forebears being the sole representatives if the term "forebears" is strictly defined as direct ancestors, and if Homo naledi is not a direct ancestor.
• The idea that the timeline has been "profoundly changed" could be seen as hyperbolic, considering that the field of paleoanthropology often expects revisions and updates as part of its normal scientific process.
• The reassessment of human evolution in light of Homo naledi may not be universally accepted, as some paleoanthropologists might argue that the species' characteristics still fit within a modified version of the linear model.
• The presence of a linear progression does not preclude the existence of other hominin species at the same time; it could simply mean that Homo sapiens is the only lineage to have survived and thrived to the present day.
• The term "ape-like" can be misleading, as it implies a direct comparison with modern apes, whereas the characteristics of early hominins were distinct and evolved separately from the lineage that led to contemporary apes.
• The cognitive and technological capabilities of Homo sapiens might have been advanced enough to avoid or minimize contact with Homo naledi, thus reducing the likelihood of meaningful interactions.
• Fossil records provide limited information on behavior, so it's difficult to make definitive claims about the relationship between brain size and behavior in extinct species.

Homo naledi is associated with certain cultural and behavioral characteristics, such as their methods of interment and tool use.

Homo naledi is thought to have deliberately deposited its dead in particular locations, suggesting actions akin to interment rituals.

The arrangement of Homo naledi's remains within both the Dinaledi and Lesedi Chambers suggests intentional placement rather than accidental gathering.

The proposition that Homo naledi, a species with a smaller cranial capacity, might have deliberately engaged in ritualistic interment practices has ignited considerable controversy. The authors drew their conclusions from an in-depth analysis of the fossil placement and the environmental context within the interconnected caverns of the Rising Star cave network. The authors convey that the substantial gathering of Homo naledi remains within the isolated Dinaledi and Lesedi Chambers, coupled with the absence of other animal remains or evidence of natural transportation, suggests intentional placement of the bodies.

The discovery of ankle bones in connection with spinal and rib elements lends additional credence to the theory that the remains were deliberately placed. The authors argue that if the remains ended up in their location due to natural events such as water movement or unintentional tumbles, one would expect the scattered skeletal remains to be dispersed more randomly. The unearthed skeletal remains were largely intact when they were initially placed in their final resting location.

Other Perspectives

• The lack of other animal remains does not necessarily indicate intentional placement, as it could also be due to the specific environmental conditions within the chambers that did not preserve other remains.
• Other factors, such as social structure, environmental pressures, and evolutionary adaptations, could also play significant roles in the development of complex behaviors like ritualistic interment, independent of cranial capacity.
• Environmental context alone is insufficient to determine the intentionality behind the placement of fossils without considering other factors such as potential transport mechanisms or the presence of predators and scavengers.
• The absence of evidence for natural transportation could also suggest a lack of understanding of the cave's complex geological and hydrological history, which may have included natural processes that are not immediately apparent.
• The proximity of different skeletal parts could be due to post-mortem movement by water or mud flows, which can sort bones by size and weight, rather than intentional arrangement by Homo naledi.
• Geological processes such as cave-ins or mudslides could have contributed to the intact preservation of the remains, sealing them in place soon after death without any human intervention.

The confirmation of such behavior challenges the established belief that complex funeral rituals were unique to Homo sapiens and closely related species.

The theory suggesting that Homo naledi deliberately buried its deceased, even though it possessed a less voluminous brain, has been met with considerable skepticism from specialists in human evolutionary studies. The prevailing view holds that the practice of burying the dead reflects advanced cognitive abilities and the capacity for abstract thinking, characteristics once believed to be unique to Homo sapiens and their close kin such as Neanderthals.

The authors propose that such behaviors may not necessitate the previously assumed substantial brain volume. The idea that Homo naledi might have deliberately buried their dead suggests a reevaluation of the cognitive capacities in our ancient kin, providing compelling proof that complex behaviors emerged within a species with a brain size significantly smaller than that of modern humans.

Other Perspectives

• The association of the remains with burial does not provide direct evidence of the rituals or intentions behind the act, which could have been practical rather than symbolic.
• The definition of "advanced cognitive abilities" is subjective and may not fully account for the range of behaviors that could be considered complex or sophisticated.
• The reluctance to accept the theory could be reflective of a broader issue within the field where new evidence that challenges established paradigms is often met with initial resistance.
• Other species, such as some birds and mammals, exhibit behaviors that could be considered complex and indicative of higher cognitive functions, challenging the idea that such traits are unique to Homo sapiens and Neanderthals.
• The interpretation of burial behavior as a sign of cognitive complexity could be anthropocentric, projecting human values onto ancient species without sufficient evidence.

Homo naledi may have used fire and created stone tools.

The possibility that Homo naledi could manipulate fire and construct rudimentary tools is indicated by the discovery of scorched bones in proximity to stone tools that may have been created by them.

The book co-written by Hawks and Berger presents additional findings that indicate Homo naledi exhibited complex behaviors, which encompass signs of deliberate burial practices. In the 2022 expedition detailed in this book, the researchers found clear signs of deliberate fire use in multiple locations within the cave system referred to as Rising Star. The presence of scorched bone fragments and ash within a distinctively colored circular clay patch indicated the previous location of a hearth. Researchers unearthed evidence of a hearth that was once carefully tended to, as indicated by a substantial layer of ash, charred animal bones, and numerous stones blackened by the effects of fire within the confines of the Rising Star Chamber.

Near the site where the hand of a young Homo naledi was found, an item bearing a strong resemblance to a tool was unearthed in the Hill Antechamber. The proximity of the stone to the skeletal remains and its possible utility as a tool suggest it may have been intentionally placed in association with the gravesite.

Practical Tips

• Experiment with controlled fire-making using primitive methods. Try creating fire with a bow drill or fire plow, techniques that don't require modern tools. This can be done safely in a controlled environment like a backyard or a camping trip, ensuring you learn about the challenges Homo naledi might have faced when manipulating fire.
• Explore your own lineage by creating a family tree that includes stories and traditions from past generations. This activity connects you with the concept of legacy and remembrance, similar to how ancient humans may have commemorated their dead. Start by interviewing older relatives, collecting photos, and documenting any known rituals or traditions. This personal archive will serve as a modern parallel to ancient burial practices, emphasizing the continuity of human behavior across ages.
• Create a simple map of your home or a familiar area, then mark spots where you perform specific activities that involve heat or light. This exercise will help you visualize how we modern humans use space in relation to energy sources, much like ancient humans might have done in their caves. You might mark the kitchen stove, the fireplace, or where you typically use a laptop or read a book under a lamp. Reflect on how these activities might correlate with the deliberate fire use in ancient settings.
• Engage in a simple experiment to learn about the preservation of historical evidence. Bury some organic material, like bones or wood, in different environments in your garden, such as dry, sandy soil, wet mud, or near a water source. After several weeks, uncover them to see how they have changed. This can give you insight into how artifacts like those found at ancient hearths are preserved or deteriorated over time.
• Start a journal to document and reflect on the tools and objects you use daily, noting their design, purpose, and what they reveal about modern human life. This activity can help you draw parallels between the tools used by early humans and the items that are essential to your life today, offering insights into the evolution of tool use and its impact on human progress.

If these behavioral capabilities are verified, it would compel us to reassess our perceptions of the cognitive and social skills possessed by our distant ancestors.

The notion that Homo naledi may have used fire and tools contributes additional layers to our comprehension of this enigmatic species. The traditional view holds that the ability to control fire and create tools was a pivotal factor in human evolution, associated with advancements in cognitive abilities, social complexity, and technological innovation. Findings concerning Homo naledi suggest that various abilities may have developed earlier and across a wider array of hominin species than previously believed.

The authors stress the potential of these discoveries to fundamentally transform our understanding of the origins of human culture and the drivers of technological advancement. Homo naledi's behavior, which included the use of fire and tools, reveals a level of complexity that belies the species' small brain size.

Practical Tips

• You can enhance your problem-solving skills by practicing tool-making with basic materials. Start by finding simple materials like sticks, stones, and vines in your backyard or a local park. Attempt to create tools that could help with everyday tasks, such as a stone hammer for cracking nuts or a vine net for carrying groceries. This hands-on activity will give you a deeper appreciation for ancestral ingenuity and may improve your ability to think creatively in solving modern problems.
• Participate in team sports or group activities that require strategic thinking and cooperation, like escape rooms or team-based video games, to observe how complex social interactions and problem-solving can occur in groups, reflecting the social and behavioral complexity that Homo naledi might have exhibited.
• Start a personal timeline of technological milestones by researching and documenting key inventions throughout history that interest you, noting how each may have built upon or diverged from previous technologies. This activity will help you appreciate the cumulative nature of technological progress and how human culture has evolved with each innovation.

Within the subterranean network known as Rising Star, enigmatic symbols and etchings have been unearthed.

The engravings found in the Dinaledi and Lesedi Chambers, which consist of geometric designs and other markings, may represent the earliest known examples of symbolic representation by a species distinct from humans.

In 2022, as they navigated the narrow passageways connected to the Hill Antechamber, Berger's group discovered a series of engravings along the walls that led to the main burial area. The carvings showcased a variety of complex patterns, including a grid-like design that closely resembles an artifact found in Gorham's Cave in Gibraltar, attributed to Neanderthal origins and estimated to be less than 100,000 years old. Other symbols found were triangles, squares, along with crisscross patterns and structures resembling steps.

The authors recognize the significant impact that analyzing these carvings can have, emphasizing their potential to revolutionize our understanding of symbolic communication across the span of human existence. The presence of these markings in association with the Homo naledi burials suggests that this species, despite its small brain size, may have possessed the cognitive capacity for abstract thought and symbolic communication.

Context

• The ability to engage in abstract thinking, problem-solving, and understanding complex concepts, which is often linked to brain size and structure but can also be influenced by other factors.
• Geometric patterns in ancient contexts are often linked to ritualistic or cultural practices. They might have served as territorial markers, spiritual symbols, or tools for teaching and storytelling.
• The grid-like design found in Gorham's Cave is one of the few pieces of evidence supporting the idea that Neanderthals engaged in symbolic activities, challenging earlier views that only modern humans had this capability.
• Creating engravings requires specific tools and techniques, indicating a level of technological development and manual dexterity in the species responsible.
• These findings challenge previous assumptions about the cognitive abilities of early hominins and suggest that the development of symbolic thought may have occurred independently in different hominin lineages.
• This refers to the use of symbols to convey meaning, a trait often associated with modern humans. It involves the ability to use abstract symbols, such as language or art, to represent objects, actions, or ideas.

The similarity of these carvings to those crafted by early relatives like Neanderthals raises intriguing questions about the origins and early development of symbolic thought.

The discovery of inscriptions in the cave system known as Rising Star sparks considerable investigation into the origins and evolution of symbolic thought among humans and their relatives. The etched patterns found in Dinaledi bear a striking similarity to those created by Neanderthals, suggesting a possible convergence of symbolic activities among different hominin species.

This finding challenges the enduring assumption that symbolic behavior is unique to humans, indicating a deeper understanding of the cognitive capacities possessed by our distant forebears. The authors suggest that the tendency to create patterns with geometric figures might be a fundamental aspect of the development of symbolic thinking, potentially linked to the rise of language skills, the understanding of mathematical principles, or the ability to analyze space. Should the markings be confirmed as intentional, they could offer a crucial link previously absent in our understanding of the evolution of symbolic communication and abstract thought.

Practical Tips

• Contributing to these projects can help you develop a sense of stewardship for historical sites and provide a practical understanding of the importance of preserving our shared heritage, echoing the preservation of Neanderthal carvings.
• Engage with local archaeology or history groups to participate in discussions or virtual tours focusing on ancient inscriptions and symbols. This interaction will provide a community-based perspective on the significance of early symbolic communication and its impact on human history.
• You can explore local caves or rock shelters to observe and photograph any patterns or markings you find. By doing this, you'll gain a firsthand understanding of the types of natural and possibly human-made patterns that can be found in such environments. Take notes on the location, the type of rock, and the patterns' characteristics. This can help you develop a personal catalog of patterns and compare them to those found in the Dinaledi cave or other archaeological sites.
• Start a hobby of collecting replicas or images of ancient carvings from various cultures. This can be a visual and tactile way to connect with the concept of symbolic convergence, allowing you to physically handle and compare items that represent this idea.
• Create a simple game that involves interpreting non-verbal cues, which can be played with friends or family. The game could involve one person acting out a series of gestures or using objects symbolically, while others guess the intended message. This activity can highlight the complexity and nuance of symbolic communication beyond human speech.
• Introduce a daily puzzle routine that involves geometric figures, such as tangrams or jigsaw puzzles that focus on fitting shapes together. This activity promotes an understanding of how different shapes can represent different concepts and ideas. As you manipulate the pieces to fit them together, you're practicing the skill of visualizing and manipulating symbols, which can translate to symbolic thinking in other areas.
• To sharpen your understanding of mathematical principles, incorporate math-based games into your leisure time. Games like Sudoku, logic puzzles, or even smartphone apps that focus on mathematical challenges can make learning fun and interactive. For instance, playing a game like "DragonBox Algebra" can help you grasp algebraic concepts without the pressure of a classroom setting.