PDF Summary:Blind Man's Bluff, by Sherry Sontag and Christopher Drew

In the concealed underwater warfare that defined the Cold War, American submarines and crews undertook daring, covert missions to monitor Soviet naval activities and gain intelligence on their nuclear capabilities. Blind Man's Bluff by Sherry Sontag and Christopher Drew provides a gripping account of these clandestine submarine operations.

With a sweeping look at the sophisticated technology developed for underwater espionage, the authors explore the feats and hazards faced by American submariners in treacherous pursuits beneath the waves. Their narrative details the momentous accomplishments and devastating accidents that impacted diplomacy between the rival superpowers during this era of maritime stealth.

(continued)...

The authors highlight the extraordinary and unyielding circumstances faced by submarine crews during espionage missions. Submarines traversed perilous depths relying chiefly on sound waves to determine their bearings. The ever-present danger of collision, the ongoing jeopardy of detection by enemy ships using sonar, and the especially hazardous rapid dives necessitated by diesel submarines were significant sources of worry.

The event with the Gudgeon in the Sea of Japan, which almost led to a disastrous plunge because of Soviet ships, highlighted how vulnerable submarines powered by diesel are and the severe difficulties they encounter during espionage missions.

In 1957, during an operation in the Sea of Japan, Soviet ships discovered the USS Gudgeon, a diesel submarine equipped with a snorkeling device. The story crafted by the authors illustrates the intense struggle to remain underwater as the available oxygen swiftly diminished. The crew of the submarine endured a critical situation for forty-eight hours as carbon dioxide levels rose dangerously and their supply of oxygen dwindled, until they were at last able to return to the surface. The event with the Gudgeon highlighted the paramount importance of stealth for diesel-powered submarines, particularly when they are in proximity to Soviet regions, because of their vulnerability.

The vanishing of the Scorpion highlighted the possibility of catastrophic submarine accidents, the enigmas often shrouding these events, and their significant impact on family members and the closely knit community of submariners.

The tragic loss of ninety-nine sailors due to the USS Scorpion's demise in 1968 underscored the perpetual danger of significant accidents, even in seemingly routine missions. The authors explore the mystery surrounding the disappearance of the submarine in the vast Atlantic Ocean and the difficulties associated with finding wreckage at a depth of 11,000 feet.

The authors meticulously analyzed the acoustic evidence and reconstructed the likely series of occurrences leading to the catastrophe, highlighting the difficulties related to torpedo malfunctions and the complexities involved in interpreting signals from underwater detection equipment. The demise of the submarine Scorpion is thought to have resulted from a torpedo accident, which emphasizes the limitations of submarine technology and the critical need for improved safety measures. The book emphasizes the continuous suffering of the Scorpion crew's family members, who are still left without definitive answers regarding the catastrophe.

The difficulties in monitoring and following submarines were intensified due to the advantages that the cold Arctic waters provided to submarines from the Soviet Union, in addition to the limitations posed by the sonar technology of the United States in these environments.

The book describes how the Soviets exploited the demanding environment under the Arctic ice to hide their expanding arsenal of missile submarines. In reaction to Soviet maneuvers, the United States covertly dispatched its attack submarines beneath the polar ice to shadow their Soviet counterparts. The submarine gained a considerable edge as the frigid waters reduced the effectiveness of American sonar and increased the risk of an unintended collision. When at rest, a submarine's quietness renders it almost imperceptible, but its noise significantly increases and becomes the most noticeable in the vicinity when it begins to navigate.

Sontag and Drew delve into the challenges faced by U.S. submariners as they navigated the icy depths below the frozen water's surface. They also delve into the challenges faced by the United States in developing a truly effective strategy or technology for conducting operations under the polar ice.

The intense rivalry between the submarine forces of the United States and the Soviet Union.

The writers portray the clandestine pursuit of underwater vessels as a constant chase marked by surveillance, stealthy movements, and the quest for technological dominance. The story emphasizes the beginning of a revolutionary era in submarine warfare, marked by a significant shift towards strategies that prioritize the use of acoustic detection technology and concealment tactics, moving away from the conventional reliance on torpedoes.

The progress made in submarine detection technology highlights the significant dangers faced by US submarine crews, along with the escalating countermeasures from Soviet forces.

The story details the way in which commanders of submarines honed their tracking techniques to counter the Soviet fleets' new maneuvers and escape tactics, compelling them to navigate increasingly hazardous waters. The US Navy's submariners, facing the challenge of more elusive and heavily armed Soviet submarines, were compelled to adopt bolder and more dangerous strategies, pushing the limits of detection and acceptable risk levels.

Commander "Whitey" Mack's engagement in the chase of a Soviet missile submarine underscored the boldness of American skippers and the challenges they encountered in tracking these sophisticated ships.

The narrative emphasizes the boldness of the U.S. Navy's command, showcasing the occasion when Commander Chester M. "Whitey" Mack, in 1969, relentlessly tracked a Soviet missile-carrying submarine for a continuous period of forty-seven days, establishing a new standard. The innovative methods employed by the commander in the persistent shadowing of the submarine involved leveraging a sophisticated sonar system to interpret each maneuver and change in the Soviet ship's path, a technique that gathered vital intelligence and established a benchmark for submarine surveillance. The authors highlight his unique personality, marked by a propensity for taking risks and a steadfast resolve to push both the submarine and its crew to their absolute limits.

The ongoing quest to enhance underwater stealth capabilities and develop advanced acoustic detection equipment highlighted the persistent efforts to track and identify increasingly silent Soviet submarines.

The United States improved its ability to detect underwater vessels and created new tactics to pinpoint the positions of enemy submarines as a countermeasure to the Soviet Union's focus on their submarine fleet. The principal objective was to systematically record and identify the unique combination of sounds produced by propellers, mechanical activities, and the various acoustic signatures unique to each Soviet submarine. The sophisticated technique of acoustic surveillance entailed detecting faint sounds that could reveal the position and activity of Soviet ships amid the multitude of noises in the sea.

The account by Sontag and Drew describes how the Lapon utilized sophisticated sonar equipment to track the Yankee's maneuvers. The narrative also highlights the crucial role played by skilled sonar technicians in carefully discerning the unique acoustic signatures of Soviet submarines amid a myriad of other marine sounds.

Soviet submarines, such as the one referred to as "Yankee doodle," executed complex tactics to detect the presence of American submarines in pursuit.

To prevent lagging behind their counterparts from the United States, Soviet submarine captains carried out intricate maneuvers, which heightened the chances of detection and the potential for mishaps. The book describes various submarine tactics, such as a maneuver called the "Yankee doodle," which entails abrupt and erratic shifts in course, as well as the "Crazy Ivan," a rapid half-circle pivot designed to confront any following submarine in a dangerous underwater chase. The escalating strain in the submarine encounters was highlighted by the awareness of the Soviet Union that their submarines were under American surveillance, prompting them to implement measures to hinder this observation.

The stationing of Soviet submarines necessitated a strategic and technological overhaul by the U.S. military, prompting them to develop new tactics and technologies to counter the challenges posed by these submarines in secure areas and the Arctic region.

Sontag and Drew analyze the tactical outcomes stemming from the Soviet naval forces' improvement in their operational abilities and their approach of positioning missile submarines closer to their own region, taking advantage of the cover offered by the Arctic ice. The maneuvers necessitated a strategic reassessment and a push for technological advancements within the U.S. submarine force.

The shift in tactics, which involved tracking Soviet submarines near their bases and under the polar ice, resulted in American submariners embarking on hazardous missions in forbidden waters, diverging from the previous strategy of open-sea pursuits.

Sontag and Drew describe the adjustments the U.S. submarine force made to their tactics, which involved maneuvering through hazardous maritime regions due to the Soviet Union's creation of secure areas under the Arctic ice and within the Barents Sea. The alteration resulted in a direct confrontation with the Soviet Union's armed forces. Sonar and electronic intercept gear were refined, but American submarine captains increasingly operated at a disadvantage, forced to rely on stealth and a good dose of luck as they attempted to locate and trail Soviet subs in densely protected waters and in the unpredictable expanses of the Arctic.

The Soviet Union responded to clandestine American submarine activities by deploying monitoring ships and improving their ability to intercept communications, which intensified the challenges faced by American missions and heightened the competition between the two superpowers.

A fleet of specially outfitted Soviet trawlers embarked to meticulously monitor the sea routes near key U.S. naval bases, with the goal of understanding the movements and strategies of American submarines when they began their missions to their surveillance positions. The writers recount various instances showcasing the boldness of Russian fishing vessels, including a 1979 incident near Guam where one such ship brazenly captured a torpedo discharged by a US missile submarine during a drill. The intelligence initiatives included sending divers to examine underwater cables, which might have been a preliminary step towards emulating the United States' attempts to tap into communications in the Okhotsk Sea.

The use of submarines in intelligence-collection efforts has significantly influenced global politics, leading to intensified political situations and tense diplomatic ties.

The work authored by Sherry Sontag and Christopher Drew delves into how submarine espionage influenced global diplomatic interactions, uncovering the tensions, ethical quandaries, and concessions in defense that accompanied the quest for intelligence and dominance.

The book highlights the significant impact that submarine espionage had on the gathering of American intelligence, the development of nuclear strategies, and the dynamics of engagement with the Soviet Union, and it also reveals the successes and risks linked to these endeavors.

The covert operations of submarines were pivotal in shaping the nuclear strategy of the United States and deepening the understanding of Soviet military potential. The authors depict that although these victories were secured, they came at significant costs and considerable risks, which also posed a threat to global diplomacy and nearly precipitated a worldwide crisis.

The clandestine mission known as "Ivy Bells" in the Sea of Okhotsk tapped into Soviet submarine communications, yielding significant intelligence but also carrying the danger of being discovered and possibly escalating hostilities.

The book discloses an operation, codenamed "Ivy Bells" during the Cold War, which was top-secret and focused on the interception of Soviet communications through the tapping of underwater cables in the Sea of Okhotsk. In 1971, surveillance missions commenced utilizing two adapted nuclear submarines, the Halibut and the Seawolf. American espionage agencies employed a uniquely designed mechanism that connected with Soviet communication lines via inductive coupling, which allowed for the capture of secret conversations and digital signals.

Sontag and Drew delve into the daring and unsanctioned mission that provided vital intelligence, enabling the United States to deeply understand the Soviet Union's ongoing worries about the arms race, their internal conversations, and their plans for their underwater vessels equipped with ballistic missiles. The authors highlight that one of the most critical and dangerous feats was the interception of Soviet communications throughout the Cold War era.

Submarine operations' bold strategies resulted in unexpected events, one of which was a collision between the Tautog and a Soviet Echo II submarine, putting diplomatic efforts at risk and forcing the United States to conceal its participation.

The authors delve into episodes where daring submarine operations occasionally jeopardized international relations, particularly during an event in 1970 when the USS Tautog and a Soviet Echo II submarine unexpectedly collided in the vicinity of the Kamchatka Peninsula. American military officials deduced from sonar readings that the Echo II had sunk, leading to the unfortunate loss of as many as ninety Soviet sailors. The Nixon administration, in an attempt to control the circumstances, instructed the Tautog's captain to withhold the details of the collision from his crew members, relying on the generally accident-prone nature of Soviet naval activities to conceal the event.

Sontag and Drew reveal how the Tautog event and the ensuing concealment by the crew and the U.S. government for two decades highlight the degree to which the Navy's strategy in handling submarine-related occurrences was often driven by the desire to prevent exacerbating Cold War hostilities. The publication includes comments from Vadim Bagdasaryan, who previously commanded a Soviet submarine and revealed in the 1990s his command of the "Black Lila," which had an encounter with the Tautog, confirming that the vessel he was in charge of stayed intact despite significant damage.

The spying activities of Walker and Pelton exposed shortcomings in US intelligence efforts and demonstrated how Soviet counterespionage tactics undermined the United States' superiority in activities related to submarines.

During the 1980s, the United States' secretive sea surveillance efforts faced significant challenges because of the betrayal by individuals like John Walker and Ronald Pelton, as depicted by the authors. Walker and his espionage group stole codes that allowed the Soviets to decode secret U.S. naval messages, thus compromising the clandestine operations of American submarines and granting them critical understanding of the effectiveness of U.S. strategies for sound masking. Pelton, who had previously worked with the NSA and subsequently faced financial difficulties, revealed details about American operations aimed at tapping into underwater cables in the Okhotsk Sea. The espionage activities significantly undermined the United States' advantage in tracking submarine movements, leading to the Soviet Union moving their submarines armed with missiles to more isolated and difficult-to-monitor waters, thereby increasing the difficulty of surveillance operations.

The narrative provided by the authors emphasizes the initial refusal of the Navy, in collaboration with the intelligence community, to acknowledge the risk of compromised classified data regarding submarine operations, and it accentuates how the early suspicions of espionage raised by intelligence analyst Richard Haver in 1982 were overlooked for a prolonged period. Following the exposure of U.S. communications security breaches in the Walker case, the Senate Intelligence Committee issued a severe reprimand to the Navy for putting the lives of submarine crews at risk.

After the Cold War, underwater surveillance strategies were adjusted to account for the reduced threat from the Soviet Union and to address new challenges and adversaries.

The authors' book narrates the decline of Soviet influence, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the development of covert surveillance beneath the waves. Naval leaders were compelled to identify fresh adversaries and redefine the strategic roles of submarines, which had seen a decrease in their importance in naval warfare.

The ongoing need to monitor Russian submarines has expanded to encompass surveillance of countries like Iran and China, while also utilizing submarines for regional conflicts and peacekeeping efforts.

Even after the Soviet Union collapsed, there remains a need for covert underwater missions. Sontag and Drew observe that, even as relations with Russia grow less tense, the naval submarine forces persist in prioritizing the close monitoring of Russian submarines. However, their surveillance operations have expanded to monitor other nations, such as Iran, which is bolstering its subaquatic warfare prowess through the procurement of sophisticated diesel Kilos from Russia, and China, which is escalating its naval military force by developing submarines equipped with missile technology and driven by nuclear energy.

The narrative also emphasizes the escalating involvement of American submarines, showcasing their importance in regional conflicts, as evidenced by an episode where a pair of submarines deployed Tomahawk cruise missiles during the Persian Gulf conflicts. The capabilities of submarines are constantly evolving to address the challenges of the twenty-first century, integrating cutting-edge technologies to augment their potential, utilizing groundbreaking autonomous underwater vehicles, and preserving their role as top-tier instruments for reconnaissance and preparing the combat environment.

Debates surrounding the deployment of submarines in intelligence operations underscore concerns about individual liberties, the sovereignty of states, and the risk of escalating conflicts or accidental nuclear events.

Even after the Cold War ended, many people continue to hold substantial ethical, legal, and political reservations about the role submarines play in carrying out secret underwater reconnaissance. The authors emphasize the viewpoint of some critics who contend that carrying out espionage operations on the high seas might risk violating the territorial integrity of other nations. The debate over the secrecy of monitoring underwater communication lines by the US or other nations is controversial, especially when this surveillance activity breaches a country's territorial waters. Some experts worry that, even with the diminished aggression between Russia and the United States, ongoing bold submarine operations might inadvertently escalate tensions and provoke a nuclear arms conflict.