PDF Summary:BIFF for CoParent Communication, by Bill Eddy, Annette T. Burns, and Kevin Chafin

Having disagreements with your coparent is nearly unavoidable, and working through conflicts together can be daunting. In BIFF for CoParent Communication, Bill Eddy, Annette T. Burns, and Kevin Chafin outline a straightforward approach to manage difficult conversations. They introduce the BIFF method—Brief, Informative, Friendly, and Firm—a framework to guide discussions away from emotional tension and toward practical solutions.

This guide walks you through using BIFF principles for all types of coparenting situations, from everyday scheduling to major decisions on education and healthcare. You'll learn strategies for identifying problematic communication patterns and responding with clear, level-headed messaging focused on your child's best interests.

(continued)...

Ensuring the monetary needs of the offspring are met.

Monetary concerns often emerge as a delicate topic among numerous co-parents. Annette Burns and Kevin Chafin champion the use of BIFF communications as a strategy to:

• Establish clear limits concerning who is responsible for various expenses, including the division of payments for activities outside of school, healthcare expenses, and other expenditures related to the upbringing of the children. Specify a timeline for reimbursements and document all payments.
• Communicate with the other parent about upcoming expenses, including those associated with educational pursuits or after-school programs. Include relevant details, such as due dates, payment methods, and any necessary documentation.
• Respond to inquiries about payments promptly and in a professional manner, acknowledging their receipt, seeking any needed details about the fees, and providing information on the timeline for the payment's processing. Steer clear of engaging in disputes over financial habits or priorities.

When you receive a reimbursement request from the other parent for an expense you believe was not agreed upon beforehand, a suitable BIFF reply would be: "Your request for reimbursement for Sarah's soccer camp has been noted. We agreed to jointly cover the cost of enrolling our child in one sports program for each season. Is it possible for us to consider an optimal approach to handling the expenses related to Sarah's ballet classes, given her enthusiastic involvement?

Managing alterations in visitation periods and parental scheduling.

Both coparents must often show adaptability and work together to adjust the schedule for parenting time. Chafin advocates for the implementation of BIFF communications as a method for.

• Suggest changes by highlighting the need for adjustments, explaining the reasons, and presenting a comprehensive plan to update the schedules. To avoid giving the impression to the other parent of being overwhelmed or controlled, Due to an immovable work commitment, I must suggest we alter the arrangements we made for the Independence Day weekend. Could we possibly exchange weekends?
• Evaluate every petition for changes thoughtfully and impartially, making certain that your reply, whether in concurrence or not, is free from emotional reactions and focuses on practical considerations. In the event of a disagreement with the proposed change, an appropriate BIFF response might acknowledge the receipt of the proposed adjustment to the forthcoming weekend's timetable. Unfortunately, my schedule for that weekend is fixed and I'm unable to make changes to fulfill your request.
• If you cannot make the requested change, suggesting other options demonstrates your willingness to collaborate and your flexibility. Could you suggest swapping one summer weekend for another?

Utilize the BIFF approach when discussing matters pertaining to education.

Both coparents must work together to create a supportive atmosphere that encourages a child's educational development and overall progress. Ensuring clear communication about school-related issues is crucial to avoid confusion and disagreements.

Working together to make choices regarding the children's schooling.

Decisions of importance concerning the schooling of a child or addressing educational hurdles require a collaborative dialogue between both coparents. Annette Burns and Kevin Chafin underscore the significance of BIFF communications by showcasing their benefits to:

• It's essential to articulate your decisions and their underlying reasons, focusing on the requirements for the children's educational growth. I explored several schools for Sarah's first year of education. I firmly believe that the school's extensive educational curriculum and emphasis on creative expression render it a perfect option.
• By utilizing a method characterized by brevity, informativeness, friendliness, and firmness, one promotes careful listening and an openness to understand the perspective of the other parent, even during conflicts. I understand your concerns about being close to the educational institution. Is it possible for us to talk about the various ways we can handle transportation and divide the duties involved?
• When disputes arise, seek resolutions that are agreeable to both individuals, prioritizing the welfare of the child and striving to meet the child's educational needs without significantly interrupting the daily schedules of either parent.

Communicating with the teachers and other staff members within the educational institution.

Engaging with school staff and educators should be done in an unbiased and professional manner to prevent involving them in conflicts between parents. Annette Burns and Kevin Chafin champion the adoption of BIFF communications as a strategy to:

• Ensure that teachers are aware of the schedule for the child's custody, have access to both parents' contact information, and are informed about any specific needs or accommodations the child might require.
• Discuss educational matters with school staff by providing concise, unbiased details focusing on specific events or concerns related to the academic progress or behavior of the children, while avoiding placing blame or speaking negatively about the other co-parent. Sarah often struggles to complete her assignments on time. Could we consider strategies that might help her improve her time management skills?
• Recognizing the commitment of the educator, along with expressing gratitude, can create an environment that is favorable for conversation and promote collaborative endeavors.

Conversing about the educational concerns pertaining to the children.

When issues arise regarding a child's behavior, school performance, or social interactions, Burns and Chafin recommend adopting an approach to communication that is concise, enlightening, cordial, and resolute.

• Communicate your insights and details to the co-parent: Make certain that both parents receive thorough updates on all matters, without assuming the other is already informed or involved. You could, for instance, mention that Sarah faced difficulties today with one of her classmates during school hours. I haven't had the opportunity to speak with her teacher yet, but ensuring you're aware of the present concern was a priority for me.
• Collaborate to create strategies and methods that focus on fostering the well-being of the child and supporting their growth, as well as fostering positive behavior. Could we collaborate on creating a strategy to enhance Sarah's interpersonal abilities within the educational environment? Let's facilitate her participation in group activities or develop methods to encourage her active involvement with others.
• Concentrate on identifying actionable solutions that honor the viewpoints of both parents and place the child's welfare first, rather than assigning fault or disparaging the alternative parenting methods or decisions.

Applying BIFF principles to address health-related issues.

Swiftly sharing details regarding health concerns is crucial for coparents, especially when faced with serious or sensitive medical situations.

Ensuring the child's health and well-being needs are met.

Discussions regarding the children's health needs should be approached with objectivity and calm, prioritizing the well-being and medical necessities of the child. Annette Burns and Kevin Chafin are the co-authors who propose:

• Make certain to keep the other parent thoroughly informed about the child's health status, any injuries they may have sustained, or ongoing medical needs, which encompasses comprehensive updates on their overall health, any symptoms they may be experiencing, and recommended treatments. You could mention, for instance, that Sarah began her day feeling feverish this morning. Upon taking her temperature, it registered at 101 degrees. Today, I intend to monitor her well-being within the familiar surroundings of our residence instead of having her attend school.
• Share relevant medical records and documentation: Make certain that essential health documents for their child, such as immunization records and allergy information, are accessible to both parents.
• Focus on what the child needs and avoid assuming that the other parent is informed or responsible for health-related matters; view these discussions as an opportunity to work together instead of assigning blame.

Coordinating appointments and setting up consultations with medical experts.

Scheduling appointments and ensuring clear communication for shared decision-making between coparents necessitates effective coordination with medical professionals. Annette T. Burns and Kevin Chafin advocate for the adoption of BIFF communication strategies.

• Make certain both parents have the necessary information to arrange medical appointments for their child, including the contact information, addresses, and web-based resources for all involved healthcare professionals.
• Provide the other parent with prior notification regarding upcoming gatherings, detailing when and where they will occur, and what they aim to accomplish. Decide whether communication with the healthcare provider will be primarily handled by one parent or if it will be a joint effort between both parents.
• Collaborate in selecting healthcare providers, ensuring that your decisions and justifications are shared through respectful and concise communication, all the while respecting the perspectives of the co-parent and prioritizing your child's well-being and joy in the consensus on a suitable healthcare expert.

When scheduling Sarah's periodic medical examination, a communication adhering to the BIFF guidelines can indicate the necessity for her standard consultation with Dr. Smith. I will make certain she arrives on time for the appointment that has been arranged for [date] at [time]. Please let me know if your schedule permits attendance, enabling us to make appropriate arrangements.

Addressing critical health conditions

Navigating significant health issues often heightens stress and anxiety for individuals who are jointly responsible for parenting. Annette Burns and Kevin Chafin emphasize the importance of employing BIFF communications for the following:

• Ensure your communication focuses on providing clear information about the health and welfare of the child, along with any medical treatments and advice from healthcare experts. For example, the physician treating Sarah has suggested additional tests to identify the reason behind her frequent headaches. I intend to schedule the upcoming assessments for the following week and will ensure you are updated regarding the results.
• Collaborate on important health-related decisions, respecting each other's perspectives while prioritizing your children's well-being: When opinions diverge, seek advice from medical professionals or a neutral mediator to help steer the conversation toward well-informed choices. I fully understand your concerns about the suggested therapy. "We should arrange a consultation with the physician to address our concerns and consider different possibilities."
• Discussions regarding sensitive health issues should be exclusively between the co-parents to shield the child from exposure to information or emotional burdens that might overwhelm them.

Applying BIFF principles during common collaborative events and situations.

Joint events and activities involving children provide an opportunity for coparents to exhibit teamwork and reciprocal esteem, thus fostering a supportive and positive environment that benefits the young ones. Implementing BIFF establishes a structure designed to manage anticipations in scenarios that might lead to disputes.

Coordinating the children's activities and overseeing their agendas.

Annette Burns and Kevin Chafin champion the use of BIFF communications as a strategy in the following scenarios:

• When proposing activities, consider the child's preferences and age-appropriateness, and coordinate them with the availability of both parents; it's important to include details about costs, duration, and transportation arrangements for the child. For instance, you could express: "Sarah is excited to become part of a football squad in the upcoming spring season. Make certain you both concur on handling the sign-up process for the local league, which remains available until a predetermined deadline.
• When considering proposed activities, prioritize the child's well-being and logistical requirements, and instead of outright dismissal, give thought to the suggestions from the co-parent, even if you're initially skeptical. Voice your concerns in a manner that is both objective and based on facts. I am concerned that participating in soccer and dance at the same time might be too much for Sarah, considering her age. Let's start by signing her up for just one activity, and then we can assess her interest and schedule as the season goes on.
• Establish a transparent strategy for handling reimbursements to avert subsequent disputes or assertions concerning costs linked to activities, and decide which individual will bear these expenses.

Participating in events and activities that include the child.

Being present at their offspring's theatrical performances or athletic events frequently presents substantial difficulties for coparents who are entangled in severe disputes. Annette Burns and Kevin Chafin emphasize the importance of employing BIFF communications for the following:

• Plan the seating arrangements beforehand, establish methods for interacting with the children during the event, and define boundaries for shared communication. I am looking forward to being at Sarah's soccer game this upcoming Saturday. I shall sit with my family members among the spectators. Please choose a seat that suits your comfort.
• Ensure that conversations and interactions around the child are composed and professional, focusing on fostering the young one's engagement and enjoyment in diverse events.
• Acknowledge and appreciate the role and contribution of the other parent. Acknowledging the significance of the child's other parent, regardless of the rarity of their encounters, demonstrates respect and contributes to a healthier atmosphere.

Setting boundaries on the use of social networking sites.

Social media platforms frequently intensify disputes and disseminate false information, especially among individuals who are inclined to engage in contentious exchanges. Burns and Chafin advocate for clear boundaries around social media use to protect the children's privacy and prevent online escalations. Co-parents are advised to adopt an approach that utilizes communication guided by the principles of BIFF in order to:

• Set up a shared agreement on the nature of digital correspondence concerning the child, which encompasses consensus on sharing images, the kind of details that can be disclosed, and restrictions on divulging the child's whereabouts: Proactively doing so reduces the likelihood of disputes or claims of unsuitable online conduct.
• Address conversations related to social media content with dignity and consideration, avoiding the use of these networks to air complaints or discontent about the other coparent or the difficulties encountered in joint parenting. For example, if you are concerned about a particular post, you might send a private message saying: "I saw the picture you posted of Sarah on Facebook. The thought that her entire identity and location are publicly available online causes me discomfort. Could you consider editing the post to protect her privacy?"
• Avoid responding to any provocative or derogatory remarks that may be posted by the other parent on different online platforms. Engaging in online disputes or casting blame will merely intensify the disagreement and could inadvertently expose the children to undue stress and negativity.

Other Perspectives

• BIFF principles, while effective, may not be suitable for all communication styles or personalities, and some parents may find the structure too rigid or impersonal.
• The assumption that BIFF communication will reduce conflicts may not hold true in high-conflict situations where deeper psychological issues or power imbalances are at play.
• Defining childcare needs with specific financial limitations might not always be feasible due to unexpected costs or changes in a parent's financial situation.
• The effectiveness of BIFF in coordinating educational and extracurricular activities assumes that both parents have equal interest and involvement, which may not always be the case.
• Scheduling medical consultations and managing healthcare requires both parents to be equally informed and cooperative, which might be challenging if one parent is less involved or if there is a lack of trust.
• Setting clear responsibilities for monetary needs assumes that both parents have a similar approach to finances, which may not be true for all coparenting relationships.
• Managing visitation changes with BIFF communication assumes that both parents are willing to be flexible, which may not be possible in all circumstances due to work or other commitments.
• The idea that discussing educational matters with BIFF always leads to agreeable resolutions may not account for situations where parents have fundamentally different educational values or priorities.
• Communicating with school staff in a BIFF manner assumes that the staff will always respond positively to this communication style, which may not be the case if they have different expectations or communication preferences.
• Addressing educational concerns with BIFF communication may not always lead to actionable solutions if the underlying issues are complex or if there is a lack of consensus on the best approach.
• Ensuring health needs are met with BIFF communication assumes that both parents have the same level of concern and understanding of medical issues, which may not be the case.
• Coordinating medical consultations with BIFF communication assumes that both parents have the same availability and willingness to engage with healthcare providers.
• Addressing critical health conditions with BIFF communication may not be sufficient in emergencies or when quick, decisive action is needed.
• Coordinating children's activities with BIFF communication assumes that both parents have equal say and that the child's preferences align with what is being proposed.
• Participating in events with BIFF communication may not address the emotional complexities that can arise from seeing the other parent in social settings, especially if there is unresolved conflict.
• Setting boundaries on social media use with BIFF communication assumes that both parents are willing to respect these boundaries and that they have similar views on privacy and online sharing.

Instructing people on how to skillfully employ methods for effective BIFF communications.

The passage underscores the significance of fostering an attitude that promotes introspection and independent improvement of abilities while adeptly applying strategies for Brief, Informative, Friendly, and Firm communication.

Developing a coaching approach focused on empowerment

The coaching method developed by Bill Eddy focuses on empowering individuals with the necessary understanding and capabilities to utilize BIFF communication methods on their own, instead of merely correcting their mistakes or providing ready-made solutions. An empowering approach involves:

• The coachee should feel at ease to express their worries, irritations, and obstacles in an environment that is secure and encouraging, free from the risk of being judged or reprimanded. The coach can foster a nurturing environment by acknowledging the emotional hurdles encountered by the coachee in interactions with a contentious co-parent and by enhancing their ability to adeptly learn and utilize BIFF communication methods.
• Concentrating on the coachee's strengths and progress: Rather than dwelling on mistakes or shortcomings, the mentor should highlight the coachee's progress in understanding and utilizing BIFF, acknowledging even the smallest improvements in their communication methods.
• The goal is to create a setting in which the person receiving coaching can autonomously assess their way of communicating, identify aspects that need enhancement, and develop plans that are customized to their unique situation and personal attributes.

The approach utilizes ten meticulously designed inquiries tailored for guidance in BIFF communication.

Eddy presents ten essential inquiries embedded in the BIFF model, which assist the individual being coached in contemplating and assessing their exchanges with others. These questions encourage the coachee to:

Evaluating the communication for its conciseness, clarity, courtesy, and assertiveness.

• Is the information shared in a concise manner? This approach prompts the person receiving guidance to consider the conciseness of their messages and determine whether they include unnecessary details or information that could elicit defensiveness or distract the recipient.
• Does it serve as a fountain of knowledge? The approach advises individuals seeking advice to concentrate on conveying crucial details while refraining from expressing personal views, showing emotions, or criticizing others.
• Is it characterized by a friendly nature? Individuals who are being coached are encouraged to reply with civility and neutrality, especially when addressing messages that might be provocative or blame-assigning.
• Is it steadfast in its position? The individual receiving guidance should evaluate if their communication effectively ends the interaction without making comments that might provoke further dialogue or conflict.

Detecting any embedded sentiments of remorse within the communication.

• Identify situations where providing unasked-for suggestions could provoke a defensive reaction from the other parent.
• Is it free of any reprimands? Identify comments that might be perceived as critical or judgmental, potentially escalating the conflict or provoking a negative response.
• Does it contain any acknowledgment of remorse? When engaging with someone frequently embroiled in heated arguments, the individual should carefully consider the manner in which they extend apologies, as these actions might be misunderstood or taken advantage of.

Considering the likely response from the other party

• What response do you expect the other person to have? This question encourages the person receiving coaching to reflect on the potential interpretation of their messages by the co-parent, which assists in assessing their effectiveness in achieving the desired outcome.

Motivating the client to begin making enhancements and refinements.

• Would you contemplate modifying, eliminating, or adding components in a different way? The individual being coached is encouraged to enhance their messaging techniques by engaging in self-reflection and evaluation, which fosters a feeling of autonomy and mastery over the way they exchange information.

Continued enhancement of the client's ability to effectively use BIFF communication techniques.

Coaching that yields results involves both aiding the individual in analyzing their messages and promoting the ongoing enhancement of their abilities. Eddy recommends:

Emphasizing the person's positive attributes and progress.

• Recognizing even the smallest enhancements in a person's skill in applying the BIFF approach to communication. Recognizing and praising their efforts encourages them to continue practicing and refining their skills.
• By encouraging the coachee's growth and reinforcing their proficiency, we enhance their independence and reduce their reliance on external validation.

The client should be encouraged to take the initiative in practicing BIFF communication independently.

• Guiding the coachee to apply a unique set of ten questions tailored for BIFF Coaching helps foster self-evaluation and problem-solving skills, which in turn allows them to independently refine and modify their messages over time.
• In a safe and structured environment, the individual being coached develops the skill to craft responses that are brief, informative, friendly, and firm through practical role-play activities.

Guiding the individual towards independence in utilizing BIFF.

• As the individual being coached gains proficiency, there is a steady reduction in the frequency of coaching sessions, which encourages independence and steers the individual toward relying on their own understanding of BIFF communication principles.
• Before sending out their messages, individuals who have received coaching are encouraged to seek advice from a trusted circle of friends or family members, which promotes accountability and supports the continuous enhancement of their ability to communicate in a manner that is clear, enlightening, amiable, and resolute, even beyond the duration of the coaching.

Other Perspectives

• While fostering introspection is valuable, some individuals may require more directive guidance and structured feedback to improve their communication skills effectively.
• Empowerment is important, but there must be a balance to ensure that the coachee does not become overconfident in their abilities before they are fully developed.
• A secure and encouraging environment is ideal, but it should not shield coachees from the reality of potential confrontations and the need to handle criticism constructively.
• Focusing on strengths and progress is beneficial, but it is also important to address and correct mistakes to prevent the reinforcement of ineffective communication habits.
• Autonomous assessment is a key goal, but some individuals may struggle with self-evaluation and could benefit from more frequent external feedback.
• The ten inquiries for BIFF communication might not cover all aspects of complex communication scenarios, and there may be situations where a different set of questions is more appropriate.
• Conciseness is generally good, but there are times when more detail is necessary to fully convey a message or to ensure understanding.
• Being informative is important, but there may be circumstances where withholding information is strategically beneficial or necessary for privacy reasons.
• Friendliness is ideal, but there may be situations where a more neutral or formal tone is required to maintain professionalism or boundaries.
• Firmness should be balanced with flexibility, as being too firm can sometimes be perceived as inflexible or uncooperative.
• Detecting sentiments of remorse is useful, but it's also important to recognize when genuine apologies are appropriate and can facilitate better communication and relationship repair.
• Considering the likely response from the other party is crucial, but it should not lead to excessive self-censorship or hinder honest communication.
• Encouraging enhancements and refinements is key, but there should be caution to ensure that changes are based on sound judgment and not just on self-critique.
• Emphasizing positive attributes and progress is encouraging, but it should not lead to complacency or a lack of attention to areas that still need improvement.
• Encouraging independent practice is good, but some individuals may benefit from continued support or periodic check-ins to ensure they are staying on track.
• Guiding towards independence is the ultimate goal, but some individuals may always benefit from a certain level of coaching or support network to maintain effective communication habits.

The crucial role played by both parents in nurturing effective communication cannot be overstated.

In this part, the focus is on the responsibility of each co-parent to manage their emotions and behavior, set proper boundaries, and prioritize their children's well-being in interactions with the other co-parent.

Assuming responsibility for your actions and reactions.

Eddy emphasizes the need to be accountable for one's own emotional reactions and the way one communicates, regardless of the behavior displayed by the co-parent. This involves:

Cultivating control over your reactions through mindfulness exercises.

• Recognizing what sets off your emotional reactions, especially the tendency to react protectively when faced with criticism or accusations, helps you control these emotions and choose more productive responses.
• Employing techniques such as deep breathing, meditation, or taking a brief pause aids in maintaining your composure and steering clear of getting caught up in the other parent's emotional chaos.

Steering clear of the pitfalls associated with accusatory language and aggressive exchanges.

• Resisting the impulse to respond to Blamespeak with defensive comments or justifications is essential; such reactions only intensify the disagreement and undermine your credibility.
• Recognizing that the actions of the other parent stem from their personal struggles and not from any shortcomings of your own can help you detach from personal attacks and focus on finding solutions for the issue at hand.

Fostering a supportive environment through constructive dialogue for the benefit of the child.

• Demonstrating to your children the importance of maintaining composure and politeness, particularly in high-pressure situations, establishes an important standard while you adeptly navigate challenging conversations with your co-parent.
• Teaching your children that they are not responsible for managing or correcting the emotional responses of the other parent helps them establish strong personal boundaries and learn to regulate their own feelings.

Creating frameworks and setting limits that foster collaborative efforts.

Establishing well-defined limits and frameworks can aid in diminishing disputes, thereby fostering a more stable and controllable coparenting dynamic. Eddy recommends:

Establishing distinct households and scheduling parental visits to preserve confidentiality.

• Respect each other's personal boundaries and routines by refraining from unexpected drop-ins or creating expectations during periods when the child is with the other parent, and do not interfere with their established family rhythms.
• Setting clear boundaries for communication and using co-parenting apps or written messages for non-urgent issues can help structure conversations to reduce the likelihood of unexpected emotional reactions or interruptions.

Determining who holds the authority to make decisions and outlining their responsibilities.

• Defining specific responsibilities for decisions, especially in areas such as healthcare, education, and extracurricular involvement, helps to minimize misunderstandings and averts the escalation of disputes into battles for control.
• Consulting a specialist to develop and implement a detailed parenting strategy can clarify duties and foster a systematic method for making choices, thereby reducing the likelihood of disagreements or misinterpretations.

Establishing protocols for the exchange of children and communication throughout the time spent under the other parent's care.

• Agreeing

Other Perspectives

• While both parents play a crucial role in nurturing effective communication, it's important to acknowledge that in some cases, one parent may be absent, uncooperative, or incapable of contributing positively to the communication dynamic.
• Managing emotions and setting boundaries are important, but it's also necessary to recognize that parents are human and may have moments of weakness where they struggle with these aspects.
• The emphasis on taking responsibility for one's actions and reactions can sometimes lead to one parent shouldering more of the emotional labor, which may not always be fair or sustainable.
• Mindfulness exercises are helpful for many, but they may not be effective or appealing to everyone; alternative strategies for managing emotions should also be considered.
• Avoiding accusatory language is ideal, but there may be situations where direct communication about problematic behavior is necessary and cannot be entirely couched in neutral language.
• Constructive dialogue is important, but there should also be room for acknowledging and expressing negative emotions in a healthy way, as suppressing these feelings can be detrimental in the long run.
• Creating frameworks and setting limits is useful, but these need to be flexible enough to accommodate the changing needs and circumstances of the children and parents involved.
• Establishing distinct households with clear boundaries is generally good advice, but for some families, a more integrated approach or co-housing arrangements might work better.
• Determining decision-making authority is crucial, but it's also important to ensure that this does not become rigid, preventing the other parent from having a say in important aspects of their child's life.
• Protocols for exchanging children and communication are necessary, but they should not become so rigid that they interfere with the spontaneous needs or wishes of the children.