PDF Summary:Bad News, by Batya Ungar-Sargon

In recent decades, American journalism has transformed from championing the working class to catering to the interests of the affluent and highly educated. In Bad News, Batya Ungar-Sargon examines this shift, exploring how the media landscape evolved to dismiss the concerns of the majority while appealing to an elite progressive minority.

Tracing journalism's journey from its humble roots serving the masses to its present exclusivity, the author sheds light on the widening disconnect between the press and the working-class population. She investigates the rise of conservative media outlets filling this void and the media's role in perpetuating societal divisions along class lines.

(continued)...

• Leverage your expertise or hobbies to offer premium services or products that appeal to a more affluent clientele. If you're skilled in a craft like woodworking, consider creating high-end custom furniture pieces. Market them as exclusive and use quality materials that justify a higher price point, thus attracting wealthier customers who are looking for unique, artisanal items.
• Create a personal reward system that incentivizes academic efforts over material gains. For instance, treat yourself to a favorite activity or small gift for every academic goal you achieve, like mastering a new skill or finishing a complex project. This reinforces the importance of academic success in your life and helps associate personal growth with positive outcomes.
• You can analyze the impact of editorial decisions by keeping a media diary for a week, noting which stories are covered and which are not, and then researching what other stories were available but didn't make the cut. This will give you a personal insight into the selectivity of media and how it shapes public discourse.
• Create a personal advertising filter by listing the qualities of your ideal products or services, such as sustainability or local production. When you encounter ads, compare them against your filter to see if they align with your values or if they're simply targeting you as part of a desirable demographic. This practice can make you a more conscious consumer and reduce the influence of targeted advertising on your purchasing decisions.
• You can observe advertising patterns of luxury brands to understand market positioning. Start by tracking where high-end brands like Patek Philippe place their ads, such as in upscale magazines or exclusive events. Note the type of imagery and messaging they use. This will give you insight into how premium brands communicate with their affluent audiences and could inform how you might position your own brand or products in the market, even if they're not luxury items.

The major news outlets have neglected to incorporate the perspectives and issues of the American working class into their journalism and audience focus.

The shift in the audience's makeup led to changes in the content, thereby alienating readers without a college degree. Batya Ungar-Sargon argues that journalism has transitioned from reporting on crime and labor matters to producing material that caters to the sophisticated boredom of learned professionals. Publications broadened their reporting to cater to wealthy suburban regions, focusing on office workers whose employment positions made them prime targets for advertisements. Modern reports on labor unrest often prioritize the views of inconvenienced commuters over the perspectives of the workers involved. Strikes evolved from symbolizing solidarity within the labor force to complaints by affluent office workers regarding the extended commute.

The author highlights that the inception of periodicals like the New York Review of Books and New York magazine signified a significant shift in how journalists viewed their readers, recognizing them not merely as a collective entity but as unique individuals with specific interests that needed to be either soothed or amplified in order to maintain and grow their loyalty to the publication. Wealthy and well-educated city dwellers in the United States sought affirmation of their cultured status, which they believed was on par with the elite groups they aspired to join, requiring them to have the right knowledge that would clearly indicate their elevated social position. Concealing one's humble beginnings required astute choices in magazine subscriptions, selecting trendy restaurants, and choosing the right wine to pair with dinner, as well as staying informed about the latest popular novel.

Other Perspectives

• Many major news outlets run special series or investigative reports that delve into the challenges faced by the working class, such as healthcare, education, and labor rights.
• There might be an argument that the perception of alienation is subjective and that readers without a college degree may not necessarily feel excluded by the content shifts in major news outlets.
• The concept of "sophisticated boredom" is subjective and may not accurately reflect the motivations or interests of all learned professionals who consume journalism.
• The claim that publications focus on wealthy suburban regions could overlook the existence of niche publications and local newspapers that cater specifically to working-class communities.
• The perception of prioritizing commuters could be influenced by the prominence of certain stories in the news cycle, rather than a systemic neglect of workers' perspectives.
• The portrayal of strikes as merely a nuisance to commuters overlooks the legitimate grievances and demands of the striking workers, which are often related to critical issues such as fair pay, safety, and job security.
• Some journalists have always considered their readers as unique individuals with specific interests, so this is not necessarily a new phenomenon introduced by the New York Review of Books.
• This perspective may overlook the role of algorithms and data analytics in shaping content, which can result in a feedback loop that reinforces existing preferences rather than expanding readers' horizons.
• The pursuit of cultural activities by wealthy, well-educated individuals could be driven by genuine passion for the arts and culture rather than a need for social affirmation.
• The pressure to conform to certain social standards by selecting trendy items can perpetuate a culture of materialism and superficiality.

The allure that conservative media channels hold for the overlooked demographic of the working class.

The author then turns her attention to the rise of media platforms with a conservative ideological slant. A common perception among many liberals is that news outlets with a right-leaning bias serve as fertile environments for the spread of misinformation and animosity. The author argues that the dominant assessment is incorrect and fails to recognize a crucial point: conservative media succeeds by concentrating on engaging with topics and concerns that resonate with the working-class audience, rather than attempting to sway them towards conservative ideologies.

Fox News was established to serve the news and cultural preferences of the working-class demographic in the United States.

The creator of Fox News, Roger Ailes, identified an overlooked audience by observing that the media did not adequately focus on the financial struggles of the working class. The writer points out that Ailes preferred to hire alumni from state schools over those from Ivy League institutions, recognizing that they had a stronger connection with the values inherent in the American labor force. Fox News successfully appealed to viewers from the working class by hiring journalists and anchors who shared their socioeconomic origins, and these viewers showed a strong inclination towards Fox News over other platforms, in contrast to outlets like the New York Times that tend to attract a readership with higher levels of education and a generally lower degree of religious observance, a pattern that demographic studies have confirmed, as the author points out.

Other Perspectives

• While Roger Ailes may have identified an underserved working-class audience, it could be argued that his approach was not solely about serving their news preferences but also about capitalizing on a market niche for business gains.
• This hiring preference might limit the pool of talent and the variety of viewpoints represented in the newsroom, which could affect the breadth and depth of news coverage.
• The claim that journalists from state schools inherently have a stronger connection with working-class values may overlook the fact that individuals from any educational background can develop an understanding of and empathy for working-class issues.
• Some working-class viewers might prioritize local news outlets over national ones like Fox News because they offer more relevant information to their daily lives and communities.
• The New York Times has made efforts to reach a wider audience through various platforms and initiatives, which may not be reflected in the demographic studies mentioned.
• The methodology of the demographic studies in question could influence the results, and without knowing the specifics, it's difficult to confirm the audience differences.

The viewpoint of conservative media outlets echoes the outlook of the laboring populace, distinguishing it from mainstream media that typically mirrors the views of the affluent progressive segment.

Batya Ungar-Sargon argues that a certain demographic, which had been overlooked, was effectively identified by Fox News, yet the portrayal is limited to the stereotypical figure of a white, Christian male. Occasionally, the commentary aired on Fox News verges on blatant racism, which consequently intensifies racial divides. The author also draws attention to a disconcerting episode concerning the right-leaning media outlet known as Breitbart News. Breitbart caters to individuals with Alt-Right inclinations by spreading altered and occasionally concocted narratives that associate racial minorities with criminal activities, with a focus on Muslims, undocumented persons, and African Americans.

The writer underscores the point that Fox News isn't responsible for turning people into conservatives. They have successfully garnered a following by shaping their content to align with the tastes of their audience. The neglect of the working class was a consequence of the atmosphere fostered by progressive media outlets. Rupert Murdoch also appears to have an inherent dislike for voids.

Other Perspectives

• The interests of the laboring populace are varied and complex, and it is an oversimplification to suggest that any one media outlet could echo the full spectrum of their outlooks.
• The concept of "mainstream media" is diverse and includes outlets with conservative and centrist perspectives, suggesting that it does not uniformly mirror progressive views.
• Fox News may not have identified an overlooked demographic so much as it has created a platform that appeals to a particular segment of the population that already held conservative views.
• The network's programming includes shows and segments that address issues relevant to a wide audience, not just topics that would be of interest to the stereotypical figure mentioned.
• Accusations of racism can sometimes stem from a difference in opinion or interpretation of the content, rather than the content itself being inherently racist.
• Fox News features a variety of commentators and hosts, some of whom actively work to avoid racist commentary and strive to engage in balanced and fair reporting.
• Some might argue that the term "Alt-Right" is often used pejoratively and can be applied too broadly, potentially mischaracterizing Breitbart's audience and editorial stance.
• Critics of the claim might suggest that the use of the term "spreads" implies a deliberate intent to deceive, which would need to be substantiated with clear evidence of such intent.
• Others might suggest that Breitbart's content is reflective of the concerns of a segment of the population who feel that issues related to crime and immigration are not adequately addressed by other media outlets.
• The strategy of aligning content with audience tastes could be seen as prioritizing commercial success over journalistic integrity, where the pursuit of ratings overshadows the commitment to balanced reporting.
• The rise of independent and social media has provided the working class with alternative platforms to voice their concerns, challenging the notion that they are neglected by mainstream media.
• Rupert Murdoch's business decisions may not be driven by a dislike for voids, but rather by a keen sense of opportunity and a desire to capitalize on market gaps.

The emergence of online platforms and the political strategies linked to the Trump administration have considerably shaped the ongoing discourse on culture and the media landscape.

The book's later sections delve into how journalism has evolved and the escalation of social strife that marks our times, a change that coincides with the advent of digital media and Donald Trump's ascent to the presidency.

The approach to generating revenue in digital journalism has experienced a transformation.

The arrival of the internet was expected to lead to a significant democratization of journalism. It was expected that the event would not take place. Digital journalism operates in a manner that is fundamentally different from the approach of conventional media outlets.

Journalistic standards have been overshadowed by the quest for engagement and extensive dissemination.

At first, media outlets thought that they would make their revenue from digital advertising, just like they had with print. This ultimately turned out to be an unrealistic fantasy. The proliferation of digital advertising and the difficulty in guaranteeing that viewers had the purchasing power for advertised products resulted in lower rates for internet advertisements. Publications adapted by altering their criteria for significance to align with market demands.

Other Perspectives

• The pressure for engagement and dissemination has also led to innovative storytelling techniques and the democratization of information, which can be seen as a positive development.
• It's possible that media outlets were aware of the challenges of digital advertising but had no viable alternative revenue models at the time.
• The rise of programmatic advertising, where ads are automatically placed where they are most likely to be effective, has made it easier for publishers to monetize their digital content.
• It could be argued that the criteria for significance have always been influenced by the audience's interests and that the digital age has simply made this alignment more transparent, rather than fundamentally changing the criteria.

The motivations of journalists now align with the priorities of advertisers and digital platforms.

Major publications began to rely on income from individuals who subscribe or pay membership dues to support their financial stability. Publications implemented tactics similar to those successful on platforms like BuzzFeed, with the goal of attracting and maintaining subscriber interest on their websites. The writer depicts the transition from a dedication to impartial reporting to the creation of material designed to attract attention and engagement on the internet. The "curiosity gap" model of digital media, in which information is hidden from the reader to keep them clicking, became a hallmark of almost every online publication, both in the headlines and the content. The material was carefully crafted to engage the audience and gradually draw them deeper into the website's content, offering more compelling material to keep their interest sustained. As a result, individuals using these platforms gained an outsized level of control in spreading information.

The detrimental effects of Twitter were acknowledged widely, extending beyond the realm of those involved in digital media. The author examines a private document from the New York Times that revealed concerns about a leading journalist's shortcomings in leveraging social media for self-promotion. The document underscored the significance of supporting reporters and their editorial staff in proactively disseminating their work and extended thanks to those who exceed expected standards of performance. Journalists at The New York Times, along with their counterparts from numerous other media organizations, discovered a readership eager to praise individuals who mirrored their own viewpoints. Journalists competed not only for the esteem of the public, the regard of their peers, and the endorsement of their superiors, but also to gain favor with activists on various online networks.

Other Perspectives

• There is a growing trend of reader-supported journalism, where direct financial support from readers through subscriptions or donations helps to insulate journalists from the pressures of advertising and platform algorithms.
• Non-profit and publicly funded media organizations may not rely as heavily on subscriptions and memberships, as they can receive funding from donations, government grants, or public financing, which can allow them to focus on public service journalism.
• The strategy to attract and maintain subscriber interest is not unique to digital platforms like BuzzFeed; it has been a fundamental aspect of publishing throughout history, with the methods evolving over time.
• The shift towards content that drives online engagement does not necessarily preclude impartiality; it's possible to create engaging material that is also fair and balanced.
• Employing the "curiosity gap" can undermine the credibility of a publication if readers feel they are consistently being baited into clicking without receiving valuable information.
• The depth of content can serve educational purposes, encouraging critical thinking and a more comprehensive understanding of issues.
• Users' control over information spread is not uniform across all platforms; some networks have more stringent controls and editorial oversight, which can diminish user influence.
• The platform allows for the democratization of information, giving a voice to individuals and groups who may not have access to traditional media outlets.
• The concerns about journalists' use of social media could be seen as a reflection of the evolving nature of journalism and the need to adapt to new technologies, rather than a fundamental problem with journalists or social media itself.
• The notion of competition for favor does not account for investigative journalists who often face public scrutiny and backlash for their work, indicating that their motivation may be driven by factors other than seeking approval.

The media's unyielding focus turned Trump's time in office into a spectacle for all to see.

Donald Trump's rise, along with his adeptness at leveraging social media and adjusting to the changing media environment, hastened the transformation of journalistic practices.

The media leveraged Trump's controversial deeds to their mutual advantage.

Throughout his campaign and presidency, Trump often directed his criticisms toward media institutions. He gained notoriety by characterizing the press as opponents of the general public and referring to their coverage as "fabricated stories." The writer underscores that the confrontational exchanges involving Trump and the progressive press served the interests of both sides. Trump's unconventional and bold presence in the public eye and on the internet significantly increased his own financial gains, as well as those of the news organizations that covered his activities. Donald Trump's media exposure was valued at approximately $2 billion, a figure that surpasses the media coverage value of his Republican primary rivals by a factor of six.

Other Perspectives

• The criticism of media institutions by Trump might also be interpreted as a defense mechanism to shield himself from scrutiny and to control the narrative surrounding his administration.
• The press serves a critical role in a democratic society by holding public figures accountable, which is not inherently oppositional to the interests of the general public.
• The coverage may have amplified divisive rhetoric and polarized the public, which can be seen as a societal detriment rather than a benefit.
• Increased media exposure can also lead to heightened scrutiny and potential financial losses if negative aspects of a business or personal brand are highlighted.
• Not all news organizations benefited equally; some may have seen a decline in their audience if their coverage was perceived as overly focused on Trump at the expense of other important news stories.
• The $2 billion valuation does not necessarily translate into tangible financial gains for Trump or his businesses, as media exposure does not directly equate to revenue or profit.
• The value of media coverage is difficult to quantify accurately, and the $2 billion figure may not fully account for the nuances of media influence or the actual impact on public opinion.

In response to the Trump administration, media outlets with liberal leanings embraced ideologies associated with "wokeness."

The executive editor of The New York Times, Dean Baquet, admitted that the extensive coverage of Trump by the media was justified, given that his actions and remarks were exceptionally extreme and could be seen as prejudiced, suggesting that to handle his campaign as if it were typical would have been a display of timidity. After Trump's victory, the media faced a critical moment of self-reflection, acknowledging their shortcomings in accurately portraying the country they are responsible for depicting through stories. In her examination, Batya Ungar-Sargon meticulously evaluates an article from BuzzFeed published a week after Trump's victory, seeking to understand the factors that contributed to the success of his election campaign. The article concluded that false narratives disseminated via Facebook misled individuals who favored Trump, offering an overly simplistic rationale: the majority of voters still rely on conventional news outlets for their information. However, this viewpoint enabled those in the media to shift responsibility for any potential errors in predicting the outcome of the election, casting it upon the supporters of Trump, who were seen as not fully understanding the events as they happened. Consequently, individuals who cast their ballots for Trump were not merely mistaken; their decision was profoundly and shockingly incorrect. Consequently, this rendered them dismissible, uncontrollable, and regarded with contempt.

Other Perspectives

• There is a possibility that the justification for extensive coverage was used selectively, and that similar actions or remarks by other political figures did not receive equivalent attention, raising questions about consistency and potential bias in media reporting practices.
• The idea of a critical moment of self-reflection assumes that all media outlets recognized a need to change, which may not be the case; some outlets might have believed their coverage was appropriate and comprehensive.
• The focus on a BuzzFeed article could imply an overemphasis on digital media's role in the election, potentially neglecting the impact of traditional campaigning and voter outreach efforts.
• False narratives on social media are not exclusive to any one political group; individuals with various political beliefs can be and are misled by misinformation.
• The complexity of electoral dynamics means that no single factor can be held responsible for prediction errors, and it is an oversimplification to target Trump supporters as the primary cause.
• Conventional news outlets often employ fact-checking mechanisms and editorial standards that can help to mitigate the spread of false narratives.
• Trump supporters, like any other voters, have a variety of information sources and may have a nuanced understanding of the events leading to the election.
• The idea of a "correct" vote implies that there is an objective standard for voting, which undermines the principle of political pluralism.
• Dismissing any large group of voters as a monolith overlooks the diversity of thought and experience within that group.

The news media's partialities were starkly exposed in their reporting and interaction with the Trump phenomenon.

The unexpected triumph of Trump in the election caught the media off guard. However, the author argues that instead of reflecting on their own failings, media professionals blamed the voters and leveraged their influence in the press to spread their individual disdain for Trump.

The media's obsession with the potential for conspiracy with Russia.

Even after an extensive two-year inquiry by a special counsel did not corroborate the allegations, media outlets persisted in focusing on the narrative of Russian collusion.

The story about Russia's connection to Trump was overstated and skewed due to the pursuit of increased revenue and a higher number of internet users.

Batya Ungar-Sargon demonstrates how leading news outlets were preoccupied with the supposed connections between Trump and Russia, highlighting every significant revelation even though Robert Mueller, a Republican lawyer and special counsel, concluded that there was no evidence to back up these claims.

Other Perspectives

• The intensity of the coverage reflected the unprecedented nature of the allegations and the potential implications for American democracy, rather than an obsession by the media.
• Not every revelation was necessarily significant; some reports may have been minor or based on circumstantial evidence, which does not warrant the same level of attention.
• The Mueller Report explicitly states that it does not exonerate President Trump on the question of obstruction of justice, which is related to the investigation into Russian interference.

The book also points out a clear lack of attention to other urgent matters, such as the opioid epidemic and urban neighborhood violence.

Meanwhile, the media paid minimal attention to pressing concerns like the opioid crisis and the uptick in city crime, because these topics did not align with the prevailing narrative centered on Russian affairs.

Practical Tips

• Start a micro-fundraiser for a local organization that addresses urgent matters like addiction or neighborhood violence. Even small amounts of money can make a difference when pooled together. You could use a platform like GoFundMe to collect donations from your circle of friends and family, and then contribute the funds to a local shelter, rehabilitation center, or youth program that's working on these issues.

Individuals who back Trump are often depicted as possessing biases based on race.

In the wake of Trump's electoral success, the press also labeled his followers as bigoted, a tactic that shifted focus away from their own failure to genuinely represent the working class—a demographic that has regularly voted for the Republican Party for a multitude of reasons, even during periods when right-leaning media was not seen as prejudiced.

News outlets grappled with understanding the complex array of motives that led a diverse range of voters from various ethnicities to support Trump.

Journalists often struggle to grasp the viewpoints of individuals from the working class, a complication that arises due to the societal gap formed by their distinct social backgrounds.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal journal to reflect on your own biases and assumptions about voter behavior. Regularly write down your thoughts when you encounter political opinions that surprise you, especially from demographics you're less familiar with. This self-reflection can help you identify any subconscious stereotypes you might hold and work towards a more nuanced perspective.

The shift in journalistic focus regarding matters of race has led to the classification of all issues related to Trump as instances of racism.

In her analysis, the author scrutinizes how leading news outlets often misconstrue studies, implying that racial biases rather than financial issues were the primary driving force behind the support for Trump. Often, these inquiries rely on measurements that inadequately reflect occurrences of prejudice rooted in racial differences. The author argues that depicting the former president's advocates as prejudiced inevitably resulted in a regrettable consequence.

Practical Tips

• Develop a habit of cross-referencing news stories with original research papers or data whenever a study is mentioned in the media. This practice will enable you to see firsthand whether the media's representation of the study aligns with the actual findings and conclusions.
• Create a dialogue with friends or family members about the complexities of measuring racial prejudice. During these conversations, focus on sharing personal experiences and observations rather than relying on statistics or studies. This can help you gain a more nuanced understanding of prejudice that goes beyond quantifiable data.

The way news organizations have championed progressive ideologies and the resulting impact on social inequalities and the functioning of democracy.

The book's concluding section delves into the emergence of critical theory, a cornerstone of wokeness ideology, within scholarly environments and considers its impact on America's media, employment sector, and the core principles of its democracy.

The origins of woke ideology are deeply embedded in critical theory and postmodernist philosophy.

The writer underscores the deep-seated scholarly beginnings from which the perspectives of wokeness advocates have emerged. She argues that earlier philosophical movements, notably postmodernism and critical theory, had a considerable impact on shaping the principles of the current woke ideology, which in turn facilitated the emergence of critical race theory.

Society is frequently portrayed as a continuous struggle where racial characteristics are the primary elements that separate the influential from those on the periphery.

During the 1960s and '70s, universities throughout Europe and the United States saw a significant rise in the sway of two intellectual movements from Germany, namely postmodernism and critical theory. The philosophical roots of these traditions are derived from the teachings of thinkers such as Marx and Hegel, and this foundation was expanded upon by French theorists who scrutinized societal structures as battlegrounds for power supremacy. They didn’t believe in universal values like truth and equality; rather, they thought that history itself was simply and only a series of power struggles between masters and slaves, oppressors and oppressed, a dynamic that was hard wired into culture, history, and even the fabric of consciousness.

Postmodern theorists contend that the notion of universal norms or truths is simply a mirage that upholds current hierarchies of power. The importance of any entity, whether it's a physical object, event, relationship, or belief system, is determined by how it interacts with surrounding elements, not by its inherent characteristics. They sought to expose the hierarchy of power by showing how purportedly universal values actually served as instruments for subjugation, preserving the supremacy of the elite while concurrently marginalizing different groups.

Context

• Sociologists study how societies categorize people based on various factors, including race, which can lead to unequal access to resources and opportunities. This stratification often results in systemic advantages for some groups over others.
• Critical theory originated with the Frankfurt School, a group of German philosophers and social theorists who sought to critique and change society by understanding the power structures that underlie cultural and social phenomena. It combines insights from various disciplines, including sociology, psychology, and economics.
• A key postmodern technique, deconstruction involves analyzing texts to reveal inherent contradictions and biases, challenging the idea of fixed meanings or truths.
• The ideas of postmodernism and critical theory continue to be relevant in discussions about identity politics, social justice, and the deconstruction of traditional narratives in media and culture.
• This idea aligns with relational ontology, which suggests that entities are defined by their relationships and interactions rather than intrinsic properties. This perspective challenges traditional views that see objects as having fixed, independent essences.
• Thinkers like Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida were influential in developing postmodern ideas. Foucault, for example, explored how power is exercised through societal institutions and knowledge systems, while Derrida focused on deconstructing texts to uncover underlying power structures.

The rejection of traditional liberal values like equality and individualism

The writer conveys the postmodernist viewpoint on the foundational legal document of the United States. Americans from various political backgrounds typically view the document as a flawed but important step toward creating a community that has progressed with respect to liberty and justice, despite postmodernists dismissing it as a tool of oppression. In this postmodern twist, what is ostensibly emblematic of goodness actually serves as a facade for oppression, disparity, and control.

Practical Tips

• Start a discussion group with friends or colleagues where you can debate and analyze the impact of postmodernist ideas on current societal norms. By actively engaging in conversations, you can better understand the practical implications of rejecting traditional liberal values and develop your own informed stance.
• Create a personal checklist of fairness criteria for any new agreements you enter into. Before signing anything, ensure that the document meets your criteria for equity, such as clear mutual benefits, absence of exploitative clauses, and provisions for dispute resolution. This will help you advocate for more balanced terms.

Wealthy white progressives have fully embraced the tenets of woke culture.

After the civil rights movement, a new wave of scholars dedicated their research to exploring the complexities of racial dynamics, eventually gaining recognition as authorities in the field of critical race theory. The author emphasizes the dedication of critical race theorists to uncovering the deceptive aspects of what we consider to be reality. They also reject the idea that the principle of equality is a misleading creation crafted by wealthy white individuals to maintain control and oppress those destined to bear the hardships of a lesser standing.

Attributing societal problems to racial factors rather than economic ones.

That this worldview is a fantasy should be clear to anyone, especially anyone who has ever spent time with a black or Latino American: Ungar-Sargon points out that it’s actually white liberals, not those deemed marginalized and oppressed according to the woke view, who have most eagerly embraced antiracism. The author suggests that individuals who are both wealthy and progressive tend to gravitate towards viewpoints that cast them in a leading role, given their mixed feelings about societal inequalities. The contemporary upper echelons of liberalism fervently endorse a societal hierarchy that confers advantages and sway to those with the most advanced educational credentials, who frequently also have considerable financial resources. Affluent progressives, despite their focus on a merit-based system, frequently act out of a motivation to be seen as compassionate and dedicated to egalitarian ideals. The concept of wokeness offered a perfect solution to the quandary, enabling people to protect their wealth and status by assigning blame for economic faults to something they couldn't influence: their racial identity. In this approach, acknowledging or confronting disparities becomes unnecessary when you and your group consistently reprimand yourselves for harboring biases that stem from distinctions based on race.

Other Perspectives

• The eagerness to embrace antiracism among white liberals could be a reflection of their awareness of systemic advantages and a genuine desire to contribute to societal change, rather than a superficial or self-serving act.
• The involvement of wealthy individuals in social causes can be a result of their greater resources and platforms, which can amplify their voices, rather than a deliberate attempt to cast themselves as leaders.
• It could be pointed out that many affluent progressives actively support policies aimed at reducing economic inequality, such as progressive taxation, increased funding for public education, and social welfare programs, which suggests a commitment to flattening societal hierarchies rather than endorsing them.
• The motivation to be seen as compassionate and dedicated to egalitarian ideals could be a positive force, driving societal change and encouraging others to engage in social justice issues.
• Wokeness often involves acknowledging and addressing systemic inequalities, which can include both racial and economic factors, suggesting that it does not solely attribute societal problems to racial identity.
• Acknowledging biases based on race can be a step towards understanding and addressing systemic issues that contribute to disparities, rather than an excuse to avoid confronting them.

The persistent sidelining of interests pertaining to the working class is frequently mischaracterized as a stride towards social equity.

The writer exemplifies her approach by actively implementing measures to guarantee equal chances. Should you believe that affirmative action was established to acknowledge the past wrongs endured by Americans of African descent, your support for it would probably be forthcoming. You might think that your higher place in society is due to your own accomplishments and interpret initiatives for affirmative action as indications that the system rewarding merit is operating as intended, implying that in the absence of such programs, individuals of color might not reach prominent roles due to the innate efficiency of the system. If the system functions as intended, then it wouldn't be an issue that it consistently overlooks a substantial segment of the disadvantaged population. The author contends that what is often seen as increased consciousness has actually worsened inequalities, influencing the way white and black communities engage with each other and the internal dynamics among various minority populations.

Practical Tips

• Volunteer with organizations that advocate for workers' rights to directly support working-class interests. By offering your time to groups that provide legal aid, educational resources, or lobbying efforts, you contribute to the empowerment of working-class communities and help counteract their sidelining in broader social narratives.
• Volunteer to audit your company's promotional materials and job descriptions for inclusive language. By carefully reviewing and suggesting changes to the language used in these materials, you can help ensure that they are welcoming to all potential applicants and do not inadvertently discourage certain groups from applying.
• Volunteer your time with local organizations that focus on mentorship for African American youth. By offering your skills and time, you can play a direct role in supporting the next generation in overcoming barriers that may exist due to past wrongs.
• Reflect on your social network to identify diverse success stories, focusing on friends or acquaintances who have achieved their status through various means. This helps you recognize the multitude of factors that contribute to social standing beyond personal achievements. For example, you might notice a friend who inherited a family business or another who benefited from community support, illustrating that success is not always self-made.
• Create a personal policy for inclusive networking by intentionally reaching out to professionals from diverse backgrounds. By expanding your own network, you not only gain varied insights but also contribute to breaking down systemic barriers that might prevent others from accessing the same opportunities.
• Create a diverse mentorship circle by reaching out to individuals from different backgrounds and experiences. This will allow you to gain a broader perspective on merit and success. For instance, if you're a professional, you could seek mentors from various ethnicities within your industry to understand their experiences and challenges, which might differ from your own.
• Start a reading group focused on literature by authors from disadvantaged backgrounds to broaden your perspective. This will help you recognize the diversity within these populations and the unique ways in which systemic oversight affects them. Choose a variety of genres – from memoirs to fiction – to cover a range of experiences and discussions.
• Engage in conscious consumption by researching the brands you buy from to ensure they uphold equitable practices. Before making a purchase, spend a few minutes checking the company's policies on fair trade, equal pay, and ethical sourcing. By choosing to support businesses that strive for equality, you contribute to a demand for fair practices, which can gradually help reduce inequalities perpetuated by consumerism.
• Start a 'Dine and Discuss' group where you invite people from diverse racial backgrounds to share a meal and discuss predetermined topics related to race and community. This encourages direct interaction and the breaking down of barriers through the universal experience of food and conversation.
• Create a personal reflection journal to document and analyze your interactions with individuals from different minority groups. Reflect on conversations, noting any dynamics you observe, and consider how these might be influenced by broader societal issues. This practice can help you identify patterns and develop a more empathetic approach to understanding the complexities of minority group dynamics in your everyday life.

Our democratic dialogues and discussions have been detrimentally impacted.

The real tragedy is that the rise of woke ideology has been detrimental, failing to address inequality effectively and harming our democratic structure by suppressing opportunities for disagreement.

People who question the dominant progressive beliefs are frequently sidelined, and their alternative viewpoints are met with intolerance.

The author emphasizes instances where people who question the claims of progressive ideology proponents face public disgrace and exclusion, particularly in the fields of journalism and academia.

Other Perspectives

• The perception of being sidelined may sometimes be a result of the manner in which alternative viewpoints are presented, rather than the viewpoints themselves.
• The claim of intolerance may overlook the mechanisms within journalism and academia that protect freedom of speech, such as tenure in academia and editorial independence in journalism.

The working class has been abandoned by both political parties, leading to a deficit in their representation.

In her book's conclusion, Ungar-Sargon illustrates that the real division within America is not of a political nature but rather one of social class. She argues that political groups from both the left and the right have abandoned the working class, leading to a marked decrease in their influence and presence in the political sphere. A specific cadre of the elite has progressively solidified their dominance, rendering others at the mercy of their authority and choices.

Context

• Legislation and policy outcomes over the past few decades, such as trade agreements and deregulation, have often favored corporate interests over those of the working class, exacerbating economic disparities.
• The cultural narrative in politics often emphasizes the "American Dream" and individual success, which can overshadow systemic issues affecting the working class, such as income inequality and lack of upward mobility.
• The decline of labor unions, which historically advocated for workers' rights and interests, has weakened the political power and representation of the working class.
• The decline of manufacturing jobs and the rise of a service-based economy have disproportionately affected the working class, leading to economic insecurity. This shift has not been adequately addressed by either party, contributing to feelings of abandonment.
• Working-class individuals often face barriers to voting, such as inflexible work hours and lack of access to polling places, leading to lower voter turnout. This reduced participation diminishes their political influence and representation.
• The rise of technology and automation has disproportionately benefited those with the skills and capital to invest in these sectors, further widening the gap between the elite and the working class.
• Access to quality education is often controlled by socioeconomic status, with the elite having more opportunities to influence educational systems and outcomes.