PDF Summary:Upheaval, by Jared Diamond

How do nations and societies navigate through turbulent upheavals and crises? In Upheaval, Jared Diamond draws upon a broad range of case studies—from the rise of Meiji Japan to Finland's Cold War-era ties with the Soviet Union—to explore the factors that contribute to successful crisis management on a national scale.

Diamond examines the challenges nations face when undergoing immense change and transition, such as acknowledging a crisis, remaining principled while adapting, and healing internal divisions once stability is regained. He delves into the pivotal role of leadership in steering a society's response, and the importance of confronting historical grievances to achieve true reconciliation. With the rise of global threats, Diamond makes a compelling case for international cooperation as key to humanity's collective prosperity.

(continued)...

• Pancasila is the official philosophical foundation of Indonesia, introduced by Sukarno in 1945. It consists of five principles: belief in one God, just and civilized humanity, unity of Indonesia, democracy guided by consensus, and social justice for all Indonesians. Pancasila serves as the guiding ideology for the Indonesian nation, shaping its governance, society, and national identity. The concept emphasizes harmony, diversity, and unity among the diverse population of Indonesia.
• The White Australia policy was a series of laws and regulations in Australia that aimed to restrict non-European immigration, particularly targeting Asians and Pacific Islanders. It sought to maintain a predominantly white population in the country, impacting immigration from various non-European countries. The policy was gradually dismantled between 1949 and 1973, with the removal of its racial components by the Whitlam government. Labor union opposition and competition in industries like mining and agriculture played a role in reinforcing the discriminatory measures against non-European immigrants.
• "National myths" are narratives or stories that a nation creates to shape its identity, often emphasizing historical events, cultural achievements, or shared values. These myths can help foster a sense of unity and pride among citizens, providing a common understanding of the country's past and present. They may not always be entirely accurate but serve to strengthen national identity and cohesion. National myths can influence how a country perceives itself and its place in the world, shaping attitudes and behaviors.
• Commodore Perry's arrival in Japan in 1853 marked the end of Japan's policy of isolation. He led a U.S. naval expedition to Japan to establish diplomatic relations and secure trade agreements. Perry's arrival and the subsequent Treaty of Kanagawa in 1854 opened Japan to the world after over two centuries of self-imposed isolation. This event played a significant role in shaping Japan's modernization and its transformation into a global power.
• Australia faced challenges transitioning from a British colony to an independent nation, reevaluating its defense strategies and international relationships. Germany grappled with issues related to accepting responsibility for its actions in World War I, dealing with economic hardships, and eventually undergoing a process of reconstruction and reunification after World War II. Both countries had to navigate significant changes in their national identities and geopolitical positions in the aftermath of major conflicts.
• Australia's gradual evolution from a British colony involved a transformation from a territory primarily governed by British authorities to a nation asserting its independence and redefining its identity. Over time, Australia shifted from a strong reliance on British influence to establishing its own distinct national character and policies. This evolution included changes in areas such as foreign relations, defense strategies, and cultural identity, reflecting a gradual process of disentanglement from its colonial past. This transition was marked by shifts in alliances, economic dependencies, and societal norms as Australia navigated its position in the changing global landscape.
• Germany's history under the Nazis: Germany under the Nazis, led by Adolf Hitler, was marked by totalitarian rule, aggressive expansionism, and the perpetration of the Holocaust, resulting in the deaths of millions of people. The Nazi regime's defeat in World War II led to Germany's division into East and West, with East Germany under Soviet influence and West Germany aligning with Western powers.
• Reunification of Germany: Following the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, Germany reunified in 1990, ending the division between East and West Germany that had persisted since the end of World War II. The reunification process involved political negotiations, economic challenges, and social integration efforts to merge the two distinct systems and populations into a single unified Germany.

The role of leadership in shaping responses to crises.

The discussion centers on whether crucial leaders are molded by their environment or embody the notion of a singularly influential individual.

Views vary on the extent to which leaders' direction influences the course of historical events.

Diamond recognizes the ongoing discussion about how significantly leadership influences historical events. He presents a twofold perspective: on one hand, emphasizing the profound impact that exceptional leaders have in shaping historical events, and on the other hand, acknowledging that these leaders are products of their unique surroundings, constrained by the cultural dynamics and historical settings that delineate their choices.

Diamond explores the perspective that major historical changes are often driven by the unique abilities, personal characteristics, and pivotal decisions of leaders. They reference figures like Churchill, whose choices undeniably altered the trajectory of their countries and global history. Leaders often appear to have authority, yet they are frequently viewed as being at the mercy of the prevailing social, economic, and political forces that shape their environment, which seemingly restrict their ability to act freely. Leaders are often deemed successful due to their sharp capacity for recognizing current tendencies and skillfully responding by crafting strategies that resonate with the sentiments of the populace or seize opportune historical events.

Exploring the impact of leadership changes on the stability of political systems and the advancement of economic progress.

Diamond draws upon thorough investigations into historical events, scrutinizing how changes in leadership determine a nation's destiny, as detailed in the comprehensive analyses by Jones and Olken. The investigation conducted by Diamond uncovers that the assessments differentiate situations that are similar except for the duration of a leader's term, which can be cut short due to their passing while in power or as a result of a lethal assault. The study sought to elevate the analysis beyond simple anecdotal evidence by providing statistically significant results regarding the influence of leadership on the evolution of economic wealth and governance frameworks.

The findings of the book suggest that while leadership plays a role, it is especially significant in the context of autocratic rulers who wield unchecked power, unlike leaders in democratic systems. Diamond argues that these discoveries lend robust backing to a nuanced view of governance, underscoring the significant role that the political environment and situational factors play in shaping a leader's impact.

Autocratic systems

The profound impact that Suharto in Indonesia and Pinochet in Chile had is markedly different from the approach of shared leadership that characterized Japan during the Meiji Era.

Diamond scrutinizes seven specific instances of national turmoil to compare the distinct leadership behaviors within autocracies and democracies. After the 1965 coup attempt, Suharto, then a relatively obscure general, systematically strengthened his hold on power, eventually establishing an authoritarian regime that endured for over three decades. Chile's history is permanently marked by the era of Pinochet, known for instituting stringent authoritarian controls and adopting capitalist economic strategies, an acknowledgment shared even by his staunchest critics. Diamond suggests that in autocratic settings, the profound influence of individual leaders is evident, citing the likes of Suharto and others as key illustrations.

The period following Japan's 1868 transformation, referred to as the Meiji era, was of equal importance and was steered by a group of leaders rather than a single dominant figure. Diamond suggests that a collective approach to governance might have mitigated extreme inclinations and prevented the rise of a single ruler with the authority to impose his will on the nation.

Leaders who rule with absolute power, especially when unchecked, possess a significant capacity to wield influence.

Diamond suggests that the trajectory of a nation can be greatly shaped by autocratic leaders, particularly those with minimal constraints on their power. Leaders who rule without the balance of democratic oversight possess a broader capacity to enforce their decisions, potentially leading to outcomes that can be advantageous or harmful.

He cites Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Pol Pot as dictators whose individual convictions and decisions profoundly and often disastrously shaped their respective countries' historical trajectories. Democratic systems grant significant authority to their leaders, but their actions are constrained by legislative frameworks, judicial oversight, and the constant threat of losing in future elections. These constraints, while potentially hindering resolute actions, serve as safeguards as well, limiting the extent of authority vested in a single person to make choices that might result in catastrophic consequences.

Governance and Dissent

Leaders effecting change by persistently overcoming significant resistance.

Diamond argues that leaders in both democratic and autocratic systems tend to have the most significant influence when they are confronted with robust resistance to their initiatives, compelling them to maneuver through a challenging and possibly perilous political terrain. He suggests that in these situations, successful leaders typically employ a strategy that consists of making gradual changes, carefully fostering agreement, participating in strategic discussions, and choosing the optimal time for the execution of their agendas.

Diamond provides several instances of leaders who overcame significant opposition and triumphed in their efforts to bring about change within their own nation. Despite encountering significant opposition from other states within these countries and from influential international forces, the unifications of Italy and Germany were meticulously orchestrated by the leading statesmen of Piedmont and Prussia. Churchill's steadfast conviction that Britain must confront Hitler was instrumental in securing American backing for the war effort, despite doubts among the American populace and discord among British officials. Other examples include President Franklin Roosevelt's patient efforts to steer the U.S. out of isolationism and prepare the country for World War II amidst a strong isolationist sentiment; President Charles de Gaulle's long and arduous campaign to reach a negotiated settlement for Algerian independence; and Willy Brandt's visionary Ostpolitik, which incrementally reduced hostilities and laid the foundation that would ultimately lead to the merging of East and West Germany, despite facing significant resistance from many Germans.

Examples: Brandt's Ostpolitik, Bismarck's German unification, and Churchill's wartime leadership

Diamond highlights the accomplishments of three notable leaders who overcame significant obstacles to enact substantial changes within their countries. The first Social Democratic chancellor of West Germany, Willy Brandt, launched his Ostpolitik policy, facing significant resistance from the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party, which had consistently refused to acknowledge East Germany and other communist states in Eastern Europe after a long period of conservative rule. Despite considerable opposition to communist ideologies within the Federal Republic of Germany, Brandt was unwavering in his conviction that recognizing the division of the country and pursuing diplomatic relations with Eastern European nations were essential measures for achieving the goal of reuniting the nation. His approach significantly eased the tensions of the Cold War and laid the groundwork for the eventual reunification of Germany two decades later.

Otto von Bismarck, who held the positions of Prussia's prime minister and the first chancellor of a united Germany, masterminded a complex array of diplomatic and military maneuvers that led to the unification of Germany in 1871. Bismarck adopted a "Realpolitik" approach, which was grounded in practicality, the dynamics of power, and the strategic formation and dissolution of alliances, despite facing opposition from factions within the German territories and significant challenges posed by neighboring European powers, particularly Austria and France. Bismarck skillfully navigated the complex political landscape of his era, unifying the German states into a cohesive nation under Prussian leadership through shrewd diplomatic maneuvers, achieving victories in crucial short conflicts, and engaging in strategic diplomatic negotiations.

Diamond argues that the way Churchill guided his nation during the conflict exemplifies a leader's success in embedding his convictions within a country facing an existential crisis, despite facing significant resistance. Upon assuming the role of Prime Minister in May 1940, at a point when German troops were advancing through France, Churchill faced a deeply divided British War Cabinet, with some members advocating for the commencement of peace talks with Hitler. Churchill, unwavering in his resolve, leveraged his eloquent speech, his expertise in navigating the intricacies of conflict, and his keen insight into the United Kingdom's nuanced role within international politics to persuade his colleagues and the British populace that continuing the fight was the only honorable and feasible path, a decision that was pivotal in shaping the trajectory of World War II.

Confronting and reconciling with past occurrences.

Germany's recognition of its wrongdoings in the Nazi era is markedly different from Japan's continuous refusal to acknowledge its wartime conduct.

Diamond examines the manner in which Germany and Japan confronted their past military misdeeds. He emphasizes the importance of countries acknowledging and confronting their historical actions when addressing a troubling past, stating that admitting to wrongdoings and taking full responsibility for human rights violations is crucial for reaching genuine reconciliation.

He asserts that after World War II, the Soviet Union embarked on a deeply earnest and thorough process of reconciling with its past actions during the Nazi regime. The author emphasizes Germany's sincere commitment to confronting its historical atrocities by starting the process of legal proceedings against Nazi war crimes, universally condemning the ideologies of the Nazis, incorporating the teaching of the Holocaust into its schools, and persistently striving to pay tribute to those who suffered. Diamond suggests that Germany's commitment to acknowledging its past actions played a crucial role in rebuilding its international ties and regaining its status as a reputable country.

Japan has frequently exhibited a general reluctance to recognize its wartime conduct, coupled with alterations to the historical narrative of its past. The author stresses that failing to adequately address historical wrongs, evidenced by ongoing disputes over the Nanjing massacre, the reluctance of the Japanese government to fully apologize for coercing women into sexual servitude, and the lack of thorough representation of Japan's military transgressions in their educational content, can obstruct reconciliation and continue to sow discord among adjacent countries. Diamond argues that Japan's insufficient introspection poses a considerable and ongoing challenge, threatening its international standing and hindering the establishment of stable relationships in the Asia-Pacific region.

The "Melian Dialogue" provides perspective for less powerful countries when they are confronted with the power dynamics of larger neighboring countries.

Diamond presents a compelling comparison between the geopolitical struggles faced by modern nations and a well-documented historical event described in Thucydides' "Melian Dialogue." In this excerpt, Thucydides recounts the events of the Peloponnesian War, focusing on the powerful Athenian Empire's dealings with the small, neutral island of Melos. The Athenians, in their quest for greater dominance, demand that Melos submit to their rule, as the Melians argue in favor of fairness and their entitlement to maintain neutrality.

Diamond highlights the stark contrast in power dynamics, portraying Athens as a symbol of the notion that might determines what is just, as the Melians plead for mercy based on moral principles. Diamond observes that the outcome is ultimately a tragic one. Following their triumph against the Melians who had resisted capitulation, the Athenians laid siege to the island, executed all the adult males, and subjected the women and children to slavery. This compelling example, according to his logic, underscores the difficult choices faced by countries with less power when they become involved in the ambitions of more dominant nations, highlighting the necessity of carefully assessing potential strategies and the willingness to consider significant compromises.

A country needs to recognize historical injustices, inform its citizens, and protect the persistent communal remembrance of these events to accomplish a state of harmony.

In his conclusive assessment, Diamond emphasizes the significance of recognizing previous wrongs, promoting learning, and honoring past events as critical measures that nations must take to heal the wounds of historical traumas. He contends that genuine apologies may mark the transition from rejection to acknowledging accountability, paving the way for forgiveness and the mending of relationships. He praises gestures such as Willy Brandt's deeply symbolic act of atonement in the Warsaw Ghetto and Patricio Aylwin's forthright acknowledgment of sorrow for the suffering caused by Pinochet's rule, underscoring these as important acknowledgments by national leaders of the damage caused by their nations.

Furthermore, Diamond advocates for incorporating education about past atrocities into national curricula, believing that honest and thorough education can help to prevent the repetition of historical wrongdoings. He emphasizes the value of teaching about the Holocaust in German educational institutions, highlighting it as a model for countries seeking to come to terms with their past wrongdoings. Finally, Diamond emphasizes the importance of respecting historical events by establishing institutions like museums and memorials, which are essential in acknowledging the struggles experienced by numerous individuals and in encouraging societal contemplation of its past. He suggests that although these efforts are unable to alter past events, they can lay the groundwork for mutual understanding, forgiveness, and ultimately, reconciliation.

Other Perspectives

• While exceptional leaders can have a profound impact, it's also true that sometimes events are driven by broader social movements or technological changes that do not hinge on individual leaders.
• The idea that leaders are solely products of their environment can be challenged by the argument that individual agency and personal values play a significant role in decision-making.
• The assertion that major historical changes are often driven by leaders' unique abilities could be countered by the perspective that sometimes these changes are the result of collective action or widespread societal shifts.
• The success of leaders in recognizing and responding to current tendencies might also be attributed to their teams or advisors, rather than their personal capacities alone.
• The influence of leadership on historical events can be overstated, as there are many instances where leaders have had little effect on the course of events due to overwhelming external factors.
• The idea that changes in leadership determine a nation's destiny can be challenged by pointing out that sometimes leaders are figureheads or puppets, with real power lying elsewhere.
• The significance of leadership in autocratic systems might be mitigated by the argument that even autocrats are constrained by international pressures, economic realities, and internal opposition.
• The capacity of autocratic leaders to shape the trajectory of a nation can be countered by the argument that long-term historical trends are more influential than any single leader's decisions.
• The constraints on democratic leaders can be seen as strengths, ensuring checks and balances that prevent the excesses of autocracy.
• The notion that successful leaders overcome significant resistance could be challenged by suggesting that sometimes leaders who face less resistance can be just as effective by avoiding conflict and fostering consensus.
• The examples of Brandt, Bismarck, and Churchill might be critiqued by arguing that their successes were partly due to circumstances or the actions of others, rather than their leadership alone.
• Germany's acknowledgment of its Nazi past could be criticized for not going far enough or for failing to address all aspects of its historical wrongdoings.
• Japan's reluctance to acknowledge wartime conduct could be defended from a cultural perspective that emphasizes different approaches to dealing with the past.
• The emphasis on recognizing historical injustices might be critiqued by those who argue for focusing on the present and future rather than revisiting past conflicts.

Tackling global challenges necessitates a collective effort from countries across the planet.

Nuclear Weapons, alongside the worldwide threats of shifting climate patterns, dwindling supplies of crucial resources, and escalating disparities in wealth, pose significant challenges.

The imperative to confront these issues and the potential for severe consequences.

Diamond emphasizes the global interdependence and highlights four critical challenges that have the potential to destabilize societies and endanger human existence: the proliferation and potential use of nuclear weapons; the unregulated alterations to our planet's climate; the depletion of essential natural resources; and the widening economic divide between rich and poor nations. While acknowledging the daunting nature of these challenges, Diamond urges his readers to recognize their shared fate and the critical need for international cooperation to avert disaster.

He argues that the level of collaboration needed among countries to address our worldwide issues is largely unparalleled, leaving us with few historical examples to direct our path. The author emphasizes the severity of these challenges, pointing out the disastrous consequences of nuclear warfare, the increasingly apparent impacts of climate change, and the intensifying conflicts over dwindling vital resources, as well as the dangers posed by global wealth inequality. He warns that inaction may lead to consequences that surpass the severity of past national crises.

Globalization as both a contributor to problems and a facilitator of solutions

Diamond acknowledges the complex and at times conflicting role that international integration plays in shaping the path of future global issues. He recognizes that the growing web of global connections has escalated various difficulties, including intense rivalry for resources, swift spread of illnesses that could cause extensive damage, and the establishment of circumstances that foster bitterness and spark international terrorism. The increased interconnectedness between nations has amplified the effects of local decisions, making distant troubles feel direct and individual.

Diamond continues to believe that as the world becomes more interconnected, it offers chances to tackle these challenges successfully. He notes that the same forces driving globalization, such as increased communication and exchange of information, can also serve to facilitate international cooperation and coordination. The increasing awareness of global climate changes, propelled by the united work of researchers and international media, has sparked activist movements. The recognition of shared challenges transcends international boundaries, fostering collaborative actions that lead to the establishment of global accords like the one agreed upon in Paris.

Mutual pacts, in addition to multilateral partnerships and regional cooperation, also involve global entities.

Global collaboration is underscored by the agreement formed within the French capital and by endeavors focused on eliminating diseases in specific regions.

Diamond emphasizes the importance of international cooperation by referencing examples where collective action and pacts among various parties have led to significant advancements in addressing global issues. The Paris Agreement, an international accord focusing on combating climate change, represents a significant step in bringing together a multitude of countries, each with distinct challenges and priorities, showcasing the possibility of worldwide agreement on addressing intricate problems that have a universal impact. He also emphasizes the effectiveness of community-driven programs that have either eradicated or greatly reduced the severity of devastating diseases, including the total eradication of rinderpest and the ongoing efforts to eliminate guinea worm and river blindness. Diamond argues that these successes offer a ray of hope amidst the formidable worldwide issues that humanity must tackle.

Diamond emphasizes the delicate nature of the Paris Agreement, highlighting its lack of robust enforcement mechanisms and noting that the withdrawal of a major country underscores the ongoing susceptibility of global cooperative efforts. He underscores the importance of robust global entities and enforceable accords capable of ensuring national compliance, proposing that effective collaborative initiatives at a regional level might provide a blueprint for upcoming worldwide endeavors.

The European Union exemplifies a sophisticated form of regional unification, showcasing both its successes and constraints.

Jared Diamond underscores the importance of consolidating regions to create a strong framework capable of addressing challenges that extend beyond the borders of single countries, exemplified by the creation of the European Union (E.U.). The author highlights the significant achievements of the European consortium, particularly its success in fostering lasting peace among historically conflicting nations, alongside its efforts to encourage economic integration and the free movement of people across borders. Jared Diamond argues that the strength of regional cooperation is exemplified by the European Union's management of transnational issues such as environmental standards, migration, and collective security, illustrating that some challenges are too substantial for individual nations to address independently.

Diamond acknowledges that the European Union is wrestling with substantial challenges, such as persistent rivalries among its member countries and the difficulties in reaching consensus on different issues, as well as the recent strains on the EU's cohesion highlighted by the outcome of the Brexit referendum. He suggests that inherent disputes are an inevitable aspect of any endeavor to unify that seeks to balance a nation's independence with the imperative for collective action.

International institutions, such as the United Nations, have experienced both successes and difficulties, underscoring the necessity to expand their functions.

Diamond recognizes the importance of international organizations such as the United Nations in facilitating worldwide discussions and fostering collaboration. He highlights major accomplishments like the eradication of smallpox and the establishment of the Montreal Protocol to safeguard the ozone layer, along with the establishment of the International Seabed Authority, demonstrating the United Nations' ability to foster global cooperation despite its imperfections.

However, Diamond also underscores the limitations of the U.N., highlighting its reliance on member countries' collaboration, its absence of autonomous authority to implement its directives, and its often susceptibility to manipulation and hindrance by influential countries. Consequently, Diamond argues that the U.N. has often been unsuccessful in tackling pressing global challenges such as resource depletion and alterations in the planet's climate, as the urgency of individual countries' issues often overshadows the benefits of united international endeavors. He ends by proposing that, in partnership with various global entities, there should be an enhancement of the role played to ensure nations are responsible and to launch worldwide plans when national hesitation and the absence of forward-looking policies persist as hindrances.

Globalization's Double-Edged Sword

With a rise in challenges, there is also an increase in the diversity of their solutions.

Diamond underscores the paradoxical nature of globalization, recognizing its contribution to the emergence of worldwide issues while also viewing it as a tool for resolving and surmounting these very challenges. He argues that the elements driving global interconnectivity, including advancements in communication, travel, and commerce, also hasten the spread of benefits and drawbacks across a wider spectrum. For instance, the spread of information about different wealth levels can spark demands for greater fairness, prompting developing countries to strive for the standard of living observed in advanced countries and motivating individuals to enhance their circumstances by moving, thereby escalating the strain on Earth's finite resources, which are already nearing their capacity. Globalization encourages a worldwide unity and the understanding that we face common obstacles, potentially giving rise to collaborative initiatives aimed at addressing these issues.

The impossibility for every person to achieve a standard of living comparable to that of the First World.

Diamond tackles the critical problem of the significant disparities in resource use and quality of life worldwide, emphasizing the unsustainable situation where a small fraction of the world's population consumes a disproportionate share of its resources. He argues that although emerging economies aspire to achieve the prosperity evident in more advanced nations, such goals are unrealistic given the finite resources available on Earth.

He convincingly argues that should the world as a whole emulate the consumption patterns of affluent countries, it would result in an unsustainable increase in demand for energy, water, and essential resources. Diamond suggests that progress depends on industrialized nations embracing more eco-friendly consumption habits and supporting nations with less development to achieve a more equitable standard of living, while avoiding the ecological mistakes of the past.

A sustainable future hinges on the creation of a more consistent standard of living and consumption habits.

In his conclusive evaluation of global disruptions, Diamond argues that striving for a future characterized by a more equitable distribution of resource use and quality of life is not just a moral imperative but also the most practical approach to guarantee worldwide stability and sustainability. He emphasizes the fundamentally unsustainable nature, both ecologically and socially, of the current situation characterized by a disparity where affluent nations consume resources at a pace thirty-two times higher than poor countries.

To create a more equitable global society, it is essential to not only curb the overconsumption prevalent in wealthy countries but also transition to renewable energy sources, while ensuring that the benefits of worldwide economic growth are distributed more equitably and handled with increased efficiency. Diamond acknowledges the difficulty of enacting widespread transformations because of the enduring political and economic powers intent on maintaining inequalities globally. Nevertheless, he conveys a measured hopefulness, suggesting that as awareness of shared global challenges increases, combined with the expanding movements across the globe pushing for change, this might set the stage for a future that is more equitable and sustainable. He ends his book with a call to action, stressing the importance of collective responsibility in tackling worldwide challenges to ensure a sustainable future for the coming generations.

Other Perspectives

• While collective effort is essential, the sovereignty and policy priorities of individual countries can make uniform action difficult.
• The effectiveness of global agreements like the Paris Agreement can be limited by non-binding commitments and varying levels of national compliance.
• Globalization may exacerbate wealth disparities by benefiting multinational corporations and developed nations more than developing countries.
• The European Union, while successful in many ways, also faces criticism for its democratic deficit and the centralization of power away from local governments.
• International institutions like the United Nations are often criticized for being ineffective due to the veto power held by permanent members of the Security Council, which can stymie collective action.
• The idea that not everyone can achieve a First World standard of living may be challenged by those who advocate for technological and economic solutions that could potentially uplift living standards without unsustainable resource use.
• The call for consistent living standards and consumption habits may be criticized for not sufficiently considering cultural differences and the right to self-determination in how societies choose to develop.
• The notion of equitable resource distribution can be contested by those who believe in market-driven economies where resource allocation is determined by market forces rather than collective agreements.