PDF Summary:Unhumans, by Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec

In their book Unhumans, Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec provide a stark look at the strategies used by communist movements throughout history. The authors analyze how communist groups exploit societal divisions and grievances, provoke violent uprisings, and consolidate power through brutal suppression.

The summary traces prominent communist revolts like the French and Russian Revolutions, the Cuban Revolution's global impact, and the cultural movements in Cold War-era America. Posobiec and Lisec examine the recurring themes and tactics of these revolts, while proposing modern strategies to counteract the influence of radical communist ideologies.

(continued)...

Other Perspectives

• The French Revolution's violence and the Reign of Terror can be seen as a complex response to systemic issues and not solely as tyrannical dominance; the revolution also led to significant social and political reforms.
• The characterization of the Jacobins as purely tyrannical ignores the political context and the fact that they also implemented policies aimed at addressing social inequalities.
• Napoleon's role in restoring stability is contentious; some argue that he also laid the groundwork for modern authoritarianism and that his rule was not entirely beneficial.
• The Bolsheviks' rise to power can also be interpreted as a response to the failure of the Tsarist regime to address the needs of its people and the inequities in Russian society.
• The actions of the Bolshevik government can be contextualized within the civil war and foreign intervention, which contributed to the harsh measures taken.
• Pyotr Wrangel's opposition might be seen as representing the interests of the old regime and not necessarily the broader population.
• The Spanish Civil War is subject to various interpretations, with some arguing that the Republican side also fought for legitimate democratic and social reforms.
• The violence against the Catholic Church and property owners in Spain can be understood within the context of a deeply polarized society and not solely as radical extremism.
• Francisco Franco's regime is often criticized for its own brutality and suppression of dissent, which some argue was as severe as the threats it claimed to combat.
• The notion that Franco's victory prevented communism in Spain oversimplifies the complex political dynamics of the time and the nature of the Republican government.

Cultural Marxism's infiltration across the United States, and

This section of the text explores the subtle and covert strategies employed to propagate communism throughout the United States. The writers of the book focus on the widespread proliferation of an ideology rooted in traditional Marxist thought, which seeks to undermine Western societies by targeting their cultural bedrock, ethical values, and principal establishments, rather than their economic frameworks.

The evolution of the Civil Rights Movement from a praiseworthy initiative into a disruptive turmoil.

Posobiec and Lisec explore the complex legacy and influence of the Civil Rights Movement, asserting that its initial goals of concluding racial segregation and achieving equality were noble and necessary, but it ultimately came under the influence of radicals who adopted strategies intended to erode fundamental elements of American society.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 laid the foundation for employing the concept of "disparate impact" as a criterion for discrimination.

The writers contend that the passage of an important piece of legislation in 1964 was a pivotal moment in the battle to overcome racial disparities by outlawing any form of bias linked to racial differences. However, the authors contend that this Act instituted a judicial principle referred to as "disparate impact," utilized to back initiatives that, despite their intentions toward affirmative action and equity, inadvertently lead to biased treatment of whites, Jews, and Asians. They contend that this legal doctrine is frequently invoked to chase after notions of "justice" instead of promoting consistency within the judicial system, a practice that overlooks individual achievements and exacerbates racial tensions.

Extremists have co-opted the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement to promote a belief system profoundly entrenched in the principles of Cultural Marxism.

Posobiec and Lisec argue that following the enactment of the Civil Rights Act, radicals altered the movement's initial goals to promote a wider agenda based on the tenets of Cultural Marxism. Activists initiated demands for a level playing field that went beyond mere legal acknowledgment, aiming for equivalent outcomes and influencing societal perspectives on racial issues in a manner that perpetuates discontent within minority groups. The strategy, which was designed to push the welfare system in the United States to its breaking point by promoting dependency on government assistance, resulted in the weakening of family ties within African American neighborhoods, exacerbated economic hardships, and, in the end, was detrimental to the very community it was supposed to help.

Conservatives have encountered challenges in their quest to counter the spread of Cultural Marxist ideology across educational settings, various media platforms, and within the halls of government.

The authors argue that conservatives have generally failed to effectively challenge the dominant influence of Cultural Marxism. Activists adopted a step-by-step strategy to infiltrate key institutions like academia, media, and government bodies, systematically silencing opposing views and embedding their ideologies deep within the fabric of American culture. The writers argue that conservatives have overly focused on conventional political tactics like casting ballots and engaging in policy discussions, while overlooking the vital cultural sphere where activists have gained enduring sway.

The transformation of American society: This describes how a series of events over multiple decades eroded traditional norms and frameworks.

Posobiec and Lisec argue that the social and cultural shifts of the 1960s, in many ways, amounted to a "revolution" that fundamentally altered American society. They highlight the positive results, such as advancements in the battle for racial equality, as well as the often overlooked tactics used by advocates to dismantle traditional structures and standards, resulting in a societal shift that continues to shape modern culture.

Extremists exploited genuine social challenges to sow division and weaken the solidarity within the United States.

Posobiec and Lisec observe that during the 1960s, a period marked by considerable social unrest, activists seized upon genuine concerns such as racial inequality, economic imbalances, and the conflict in Vietnam to deepen societal rifts and destabilize the nation's foundation. During that time, the prevalent skepticism towards the government intensified, fueled by the disenchantment stemming from the Vietnam conflict and a general suspicion of those in power, fostering a climate that was open to revolutionary beliefs advocating for a departure from traditional norms.

The domain of education succumbed to the sway of progressive thought, which, via the media, molded the convictions of the coming ages.

The authors observe that during this period, the left gained considerable sway over critical societal aspects, particularly in the sectors of education, media, and cultural expression. They argue that these measures allowed extremists to shape future generations' views by steering the narrative and promoting their own beliefs. Posobiec and Lisec explore the Dartmouth Black Panther occupation of the 1970s, showing how radical activists quickly assumed command of the university's governance, which established a model that has impacted the broad array of initiatives aimed at fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion in educational settings.

Conservatives frequently find it challenging to counteract the widespread impact of Cultural Marxism effectively.

Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec continue their sharp criticism of right-wing figures, reproaching them for failing to effectively counter the spread of Cultural Marxism during the 1960s. They contend that conservatives, rather than confronting the activists pushing forward with radical change, assumed a passive stance, focusing on preserving current institutions and decelerating the transformation rather than initiating an assertive counteraction. The authors argue that the very structure of American society has been transformed because there was no substantial resistance to the widespread effects of Cultural Marxism, a force that continues to have a profound impact on our era.

Other Perspectives

• The term "Cultural Marxism" is often used pejoratively and lacks a clear definition, which can lead to its misuse in political discourse.
• The Civil Rights Movement's evolution can be seen as a natural progression of any social movement, adapting to new challenges and societal changes over time.
• The concept of "disparate impact" is a recognized legal principle aimed at addressing systemic discrimination, not necessarily a tool for promoting bias against any group.
• The Civil Rights Movement's legacy is multifaceted, and attributing its outcomes solely to the influence of radicalism oversimplifies its history and achievements.
• The assertion that Cultural Marxism is a coherent ideology or strategy that has been systematically implemented may not be supported by concrete evidence.
• Conservatives have engaged in cultural debates and have had significant influence on policy, media, and education, suggesting a more complex interplay of ideologies than a one-sided infiltration.
• The societal changes of the 1960s can also be viewed as necessary reforms that addressed longstanding injustices and inequalities.
• The notion that social challenges were exploited to sow division overlooks the genuine grievances and aspirations for equality and justice that drove social movements.
• The influence of progressive thought in education and media is not universally accepted as negative, and many argue that it has contributed to a more inclusive and equitable society.
• The effectiveness of conservative strategies in countering what is termed Cultural Marxism may be underestimated, as conservative ideas continue to have a strong presence in American political and cultural life.

In an era characterized by global political strain, often referred to as the Cold War.

The section explores various proxy conflicts and rebellious movements that were backed by the Soviet Union during the latter part of the twentieth century. The authors illuminate the extensive ambitions and complex global interactions that shaped the period known as the Cold War.

Fidel Castro's ascent to leadership in Cuba was driven by support from the Soviet Union, which culminated in the creation of a communist regime.

Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec explore how, through his influential command and Soviet backing, Fidel Castro capitalized on the unrest within Cuban society to effectively orchestrate a Marxist uprising.

Che Guevara, alongside Castro, capitalized on real concerns to secure widespread backing.

The narrative depicts how Castro, along with Che Guevara who would eventually symbolize Cultural Marxism, capitalized on the genuine grievances of the Cuban people to secure broad support for their revolutionary cause. They leveraged the country's discontent with the ruling elite, presenting themselves as advocates for economic and social fairness, while denouncing the current authorities for their lack of honesty and their close ties to American business conglomerates. Castro employed strategies that appeared to cater to the people while secretly harboring ambitions aligned with Marxist-Leninist ideology, thus securing his grip on power with little initial opposition.

The Soviet Union provided the communist revolutionaries with substantial aid and intelligence operations.

Posobiec and Lisec emphasize the crucial role that support originating from the Soviet Union played in securing the victory of the Cuban Revolution. Castro's influence within the country was solidified through significant support from the USSR in the form of military, economic, and intelligence aid. The book details the KGB's pivotal role in Fidel Castro's triumph over Batista by supplying essential strategic guidance, arms, and instruction, which resulted in the establishment of a regime that worked in close alliance with the Soviet Union.

The Cuban Revolution's lasting impact on Latin America and its significant role in spreading communist ideology across the globe.

The book presents the Cuban Revolution as a critical precedent for later communist movements throughout Latin America. They describe how Castro, bolstered by Soviet support, became a regional figurehead for communist movements across the continent, inspiring revolutionaries and providing them with resources, training, and ideological justification. The book also underscores the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, a pivotal moment when the placement of Soviet missiles on Cuban soil almost sparked worldwide nuclear warfare, highlighting the consequences of the Cuban Revolution and the degree to which the Soviet Union challenged American supremacy.

Salvador Allende's socialist experiment in Chile, which followed Marxist principles, experienced both an ascent and a subsequent decline.

Posobiec and Lisec explore the ephemeral era of socialism under Salvador Allende in Chile, highlighting the complex political maneuvers and the critical measures implemented by General Augusto Pinochet to interrupt Chile's prolonged movement toward communism.

Supporters of Allende, with Soviet support, schemed to seize power through violent communist means.

The authors portray Allende as a committed Marxist who, prior to achieving his narrow electoral win with a mere 36.6 percent of the vote, had established a foundation for total control and was deliberately fostering solid ties with Cuban leaders, in addition to maintaining links with the USSR. The authors depict Allende as amassing forces equipped by the Soviets, preparing for a battle he deemed essential to eliminate a certain portion of the country's population, particularly focusing on individuals who resisted communist ideologies. Once he assumed office, his approach to economic management and efforts to bypass constitutional constraints sparked a backlash.

The military officials formed a governing body that was headed by General Augusto Pinochet.

Posobiec and Lisec recount how the Chilean military, led by General Augusto Pinochet, responded to mass unrest provoked by Allende’s policies, launching a military coup to prevent what in their view was an imminent communist takeover. The writers argue that although the regime of the Chilean leader was characterized by disputes and violations of human rights, it was instrumental in restoring order, rejuvenating the nation's economic framework, and setting the stage for its eventual rebirth as a democratic state.

The left's unrelenting legal challenges against Pinochet highlight their dedication to confronting leaders who stood against communism.

The authors highlight how the left globally employs legal tactics to weaken and reduce the influence of leaders who resist communism, using the legal pursuits after Pinochet stepped down as a prime example. The case advanced significantly due to the involvement of a court in Spain, which operated on the principle that a court can deliver justice worldwide, irrespective of the location of the criminal acts. The authors argue that the campaign against Pinochet serves as a cautionary example, demonstrating how activists might employ legal and media tactics to deter worldwide resistance to communist philosophies, even after the collapse of a communist regime.

Other Perspectives

• The support from the Soviet Union to Fidel Castro and the Cuban revolutionaries can be seen as part of a broader geopolitical strategy during the Cold War rather than a genuine commitment to Marxist ideology.
• The narrative that Castro and Guevara capitalized on genuine grievances could be nuanced by acknowledging that many revolutions arise from real societal issues and the leaders' ability to address them can be a legitimate part of their appeal.
• The impact of the Cuban Revolution on Latin America could be contextualized within a larger framework of regional dynamics, including the role of U.S. foreign policy and other local factors that also contributed to the spread of communist ideology.
• The characterization of Salvador Allende's government as a violent communist regime in waiting could be balanced with perspectives that view his administration as a democratically elected government attempting to implement socialist reforms within a constitutional framework.
• The military coup led by General Augusto Pinochet can be criticized for its methods and the subsequent human rights violations, which some argue were disproportionate and not justified by the threat posed by Allende's government.
• The legal challenges against Pinochet could be seen as a legitimate exercise of international human rights law, rather than solely as a tactic by the left to confront anti-communist leaders.

Strategies to counteract the modern irregular communists' covert strategies.

This section of the narrative offers strategies to counteract the modern, unconventional communist turmoil unfolding across Western countries. The authors emphasize the need to understand that the current conflict unfolds in a complex domain where strategies involving culture, media, and legislation are subtly used to destabilize, rather than through traditional combat, requiring astute and adaptable strategies to oppose these undermining forces.

The Ouroboros Strategy hinges on the concept that the self-created conflicts among communists will ultimately cause their collapse.

Posobiec and Lisec introduce the "Ouroboros Option," a strategy based on the idea that communists will fall victim to the chaos and collapse that originates from within. The writers argue that the inherent contradictions within communist ideology, along with its attraction to power-seekers, inevitably lead to internal conflict, taking the form of purges and unrest. In their effort to suppress communist beliefs, they unintentionally let inherent flaws lead to their collapse.

The quest for dominance often leads to internal strife among communists.

The authors describe the inevitability of internal conflict among communists, fueled by resentment and a desire for control, following the collapse or weakening of the existing social order. They argue that in a setting where absolute adherence to a single ideology is rigidly demanded, the result is invariably the purging of those within the collective perceived as opponents to the transformative agenda, reminiscent of past occurrences such as the French Reign of Terror, the incarceration camps in the Soviet Union, and China's era of severe societal and political turmoil. The inherent self-destructive nature of communist regimes inherently limits their long-term viability, creating opportunities for opposing entities to exploit these internal divisions.

Preventing the spread of communism and making sure it fails to establish itself in new regions is crucial.

The authors maintain that halting the proliferation of communism is crucial for its eventual collapse. They contend that by limiting the spread of territory and preventing the rise of these movements in new regions, it's possible to deprive them of resources, fresh recruits, and the momentum of their ideology. The authors outline containment as a multifaceted approach combining diplomacy, economic penalties, and a preparedness for military defense to thwart territorial expansion. However, communities must remain ever-watchful, steadfastly rejecting any engagement with or endorsement of the tactics used by the unhumans.

Determined historical figures have the capacity to suppress communist revolts.

Throughout history, formidable adversaries like the distinguished Deborah and Joan of Arc have stood against the tide of communism, distinguished by their extraordinary strategic acumen and unwavering resolve. The authors contend that such leaders possess the capacity to bring together opposing factions, motivate them towards collective action, and take assertive measures to quell insurgencies in their infancy.

Pyotr Wrangel, Francisco Franco, and Chiang Kai-shek surmounted the obstacles presented by groups that supported the communist cause with unwavering resolve and tactical acumen.

The narrative highlights numerous pivotal moments in history where determined figures such as Pyotr Wrangel, Francisco Franco, and Chiang Kai-shek played key roles in halting the advance of communism or in overthrowing entrenched governments. Posobiec and Lisec argue that these individuals were acutely conscious of the substantial risks posed by ideologies that oppose freedom and quickly rallied their supporters, using every available tactic to defeat their opponents.

It is essential to develop leaders of outstanding quality who can lead the collective resistance to communism.

Posobiec and Lisec emphasize the critical need to recognize and bolster individuals who possess exceptional abilities and influence, as they are key in halting the spread of totalitarian ideologies and preserving the core values of our social fabric. In the modern era, recognizing figures such as Elon Musk is crucial, as they confront the ideologies of cultural Marxism and drive technological progress forward. However, the authors also recognize that depending solely on influential figures carries significant risks, and therefore, it is imperative for the community to participate broadly in creating the frameworks, relationships, and social foundations that support these leaders and provide them with the essential support to triumph. Achieving victory requires a comprehensive and tactical approach that integrates all levels of the community, rather than relying solely on the efforts of one person.

The plan is carefully designed to preemptively suppress the rise of communist uprisings, guaranteeing triumph.

The writers stress the necessity of proactively thwarting communist operatives' attempts to protect the values cherished by honorable individuals. They recommend establishing a societal structure that is resilient to the chaos stemming from communist uprisings, which stands in stark contrast to the OPE's tactics of inciting discord, disseminating disinformation, and infiltrating various levels of society.

Communists utilize subtle manipulation and carefully planned deceit to erode social frameworks from within.

The writers clarify that, although it may seem like communist uprisings occur abruptly and in disarray, they usually follow an extended phase of covert undermining. They utilize a carefully orchestrated combination of covert propaganda and the subtle steering of public discourse, in addition to the deliberate infiltration of key institutions, to weaken solidarity and reduce the vigor of societal bonds well in advance of any direct conflict. They have the patience to wait for years, or even generations, before taking any significant action. The writers argue that in this era, profoundly influenced by a particular cultural ideology, the struggle is waged through control over the spread of information, changing the application of language, and silencing dissenters. Cancel culture's rise is marked by the alteration of traditional narratives and the continuous promotion of forward-thinking ideologies through channels of education, various media, and diverse entertainment mediums.

To combat these tactics, one must prioritize transparent communication, initiate legal proceedings, and restore widely held societal values and standards.

Posobiec and Lisec outline a detailed plan aimed at countering the growing sway of communist ideology. They recommend concentrating on the collective entities that employ online platforms to belittle, oppress, and discredit their opponents. They utilize legal and financial tactics to confront these unhumans, orchestrating joint legal actions and deliberate sanctions to subject them to the same hardships they impose on the innocent and those loyal to their country. They advocate for the establishment of a national initiative designed to expose the allocation of government funds to entities that destabilize the existing hierarchy, with the goal of severing the vital funding on which these radical organizations depend. The authors stress the need to revive shared cultural values and convictions within the community, creating a strong social framework that can resist attempts by communist proponents to penetrate and weaken it, while also promoting individual responsibility, self-reliance, and a fervent dedication to freedom. This necessitates the creation of robust connections among friends, relatives, and community members, encouraging reciprocal assistance, and engaging proactively with municipal governance. Measures should be taken to quell the rebellion before it even has the opportunity to commence.

Other Perspectives

• The Ouroboros Strategy may oversimplify the complexity of political movements, ignoring the potential for reform and evolution within communist or leftist ideologies.
• Internal strife is not unique to communist movements and can be observed in various political and ideological groups, suggesting that dominance-seeking behavior is a general human trait rather than specific to communism.
• The assertion that preventing the spread of communism is crucial for its collapse could be challenged by the perspective that engagement and dialogue may lead to more peaceful and constructive outcomes than containment and isolation.
• Historical comparisons may lack context, as figures like Deborah and Joan of Arc operated in vastly different historical and ideological landscapes compared to modern political movements.
• The effectiveness of leaders like Pyotr Wrangel, Francisco Franco, and Chiang Kai-shek in halting communism can be debated, as their methods and the long-term consequences of their actions have been controversial and subject to criticism.
• The focus on developing exceptional leaders to resist communism might be critiqued for promoting a "great man" theory of history, which overlooks the importance of collective action and societal structures in shaping historical outcomes.
• The plan to preemptively suppress communist uprisings could be criticized for potentially infringing on civil liberties and the right to dissent, which are core values in many Western democracies.
• The portrayal of communists using manipulation and deceit could be seen as a biased generalization that does not account for the diverse motivations and tactics of individuals within these movements.
• The recommendation for transparent communication and legal actions could be met with skepticism regarding the impartiality of legal systems and the media, which may also be influenced by political and ideological biases.