PDF Summary:Twice a Daughter, by Julie Ryan McGue

Twice a Daughter by Julie Ryan McGue chronicles the author's emotional journey to uncover her biological roots. After a health scare, McGue embarks on a search for her birth parents to gain crucial medical history. She eventually tracks down her biological mother, Shirley, and after initial hesitance, forges a connection.

McGue details the complex process of locating her biological father while navigating the difficulties adoptees face due to sealed records. Despite societal stigma and legal hurdles, she ultimately unearths her paternal lineage and builds bonds with her newfound relatives. McGue's tale underscores the fundamental human need to understand one's identity and heritage.

(continued)...

• Consider writing letters to both known and unknown family members to express your thoughts and feelings about your connections with them. Even if you choose not to send these letters, the act of writing can help clarify your emotions and intentions regarding family relationships. If you do decide to reach out, these letters can be a heartfelt way to initiate contact or strengthen existing bonds.
• Create a "connection map" to visually represent the relationships between your adoptive family, biological family, and any significant non-family connections that have impacted your life. Use different colors or symbols to denote the type of relationship (e.g., adoptive, biological, neighbor) and include notes about the nature of each connection. This map can help you appreciate the complexity and richness of your personal network and may reveal surprising links or patterns.

Driven by a quest to gain deeper insight into her medical history, Julie embarks on an expedition to uncover her biological family.

The section of the guide highlights the author's decision to search for her biological parents, a decision that was greatly influenced by concerns over genetic health issues within her family. Julie's narrative underscores the challenges adoptees and their descendants encounter when sealed adoptions' opacity obstructs their access to essential health and wellness information.

Julie's concerns about potential inherited health issues prompted her to undergo a biopsy of breast tissue.

In 2008, at the age of forty-eight, the author underwent a breast biopsy as prescribed by her physician. Julie, motivated by the possibility of a cancer diagnosis and backed by her spouse, pursued obtaining her adoption documents from her adoptive parents to compile a detailed account of her genetic family's medical background. Julie discovered through the records of the Illinois Department of Public Health that her biological parents were in their twenties when she was born, not in their teenage years, and that her biological mother practiced Catholicism. Julie, comforted by the harmless results of her medical test, explored the details of her private adoption more thoroughly.

Julie Ryan McGue initiated a journey to uncover her genetic health history in order to gain insight into her own medical requirements.

The author delved deeper into her adoption history, driven by the need to create an extensive medical history for both her children's and her own use. Julie set out to discover the health history of her biological family, engaging a well-known detective in her area, registering for multiple websites focused on reuniting adoptees with their families, and on two separate occasions within two decades, she reached out to the organization responsible for her adoption. After overcoming numerous obstacles, Julie eventually found out about the Illinois Confidential Intermediary program through crucial information obtained from a private detective.

Her inability to access her health history, due to the sealed adoption records, was a significant source of frustration for her.

The author frequently voices her frustration over the inaccessibility of her health records, a feeling common among many adoptees because her adoption records were sealed. She continues unwaveringly on her journey to locate her birth parents. Julie feels powerless because her access to health information is restricted. At every point in her search journey, her next step is dictated by a government agency, adoption experts with differing opinions, and changing state and federal laws.

The discovery of a familial pattern related to colon cancer.

Julie discovered that her birth mother had used a false name when utilizing a service that enabled confidential correspondence. Julie requested her medical records as a step in her ongoing quest to locate her birth mother after learning that the Midwest Adoption Center was unable to identify her using the false name on her birth certificate. Julie felt a profound sense of sorrow upon learning, through the acquisition of her medical background records, that she had lost a biological aunt to breast cancer at the age of thirty-nine, while another aunt was contending with uterine cancer.

Julie feels an increased urgency to intensify her search for her birth parents.

The search for her biological father by the author was driven by the medical history information provided by the woman who gave her life. She sought the expertise of a skilled genealogist from Wisconsin when the intermediary service couldn't find him, and the specialist suggested searching for Dick Thomlinson instead of Dick Thomson. Julie took comfort in knowing that the family of the man who might be her biological father had a well-documented history of breast cancer, and she found it particularly consoling that he provided her with a completed health questionnaire, despite his choice not to participate in DNA testing.

Anxiety about potentially inheriting these genetic conditions

With a growing family history of breast and colon cancer on her mother's side, Julie was concerned about her own health and that of her children. She sought guidance from medical professionals who recommended investigating the medical history of her biological father. Julie's quest to comprehend her origins through adoption intensified as health challenges arose, and the insights she obtained from her biological family provided her with peace of mind.

Practical Tips

• You can start a health journal to track any recurring health issues and patterns in your family. Begin by noting down any known health conditions of your immediate family members, and then reach out to extended family to gather more information. This can help you identify potential hereditary health risks and discuss them with your healthcare provider.
• Create a "family health tree" using a free online template or app to visually map out the medical history of your relatives. This can include information like age, existing health conditions, and causes of death. A visual representation can make it easier to spot hereditary patterns and discuss them with a genetic counselor.
• Engage in regular preventative health screenings based on the common health issues you've identified in your family history. For example, if there's a pattern of colon cancer, you might schedule regular colonoscopies earlier than the general recommendation. Proactive screening can lead to early detection and better management of potential health risks.

The challenges adoptees confront when trying to uncover their past are compounded by the societal and legal framework of sealed adoptions.

This section of the book guide explores the complex elements of adoption procedures, highlighting how American cultural norms, especially in the 1950s, encouraged the adoption of aliases, the preservation of secrecy, and the creation of confidential adoptions. The writer's story reflects the evolving terrain of the rights of adopted individuals, facing a multitude of legal and social obstacles in her pursuit to discover her adoption background.

During the 1950s, pregnancies occurring outside of marriage often carried a stigma and secrecy that were commonly associated with the process of adopting a child.

Julie's story illuminates the challenges faced by adoptees as they navigate the complex rules and systems associated with the adoption process conducted privately. Shirley Desjardins, whom Julie Ryan McGue met, had kept her pregnancy and the subsequent adoption a secret from all her relatives and acquaintances. The ramifications of that secret being disclosed were severe. Shirley harbored concerns that her future spouse might reject her, her career in education could be jeopardized, and her reputation within her family and the wider society could be damaged.

Shirley's efforts to keep her pregnancy and adoption a secret, even from her own family

The author consistently highlights the character's apprehension about revealing her secret to others. Initially, Shirley was reluctant to interact with Julie and her twin sister, Jenny. In the process of her reunion, Shirley insisted that her extended family and friends not be informed. While dining in a public setting, Shirley felt uneasy about the possibility of recognition and offhandedly referred to her daughters as short-term acquaintances. The situation's intricacy underscores the significant challenges in revealing well-hidden realities and the intricate issues that arise when children previously relinquished come back into the lives of their biological mothers.

Julie and Jenny encountered difficulties due to the closed adoption policies that safeguarded the confidentiality of the identities of their biological parents.

Julie's journey to discover her ancestral roots and medical heritage highlights the difficulties that closed adoption files create for individuals seeking to understand their genetic beginnings. The availability of vital documents such as birth and marriage certificates, as well as adoption decrees, which are mandated by law to be acquired from the vital records departments of the state or country that issued them, is frequently limited due to the fluctuating legal frameworks that oversee adoption.

Adoptees' increasing entitlement to obtain their initial birth documentation and health backgrounds.

In the United States, traditionally, the confidentiality of biological parents has been given precedence over the rights of adoptees to obtain their personal historical records. Since the 1990s, numerous states have permitted open adoptions, facilitating the sharing of personal details among the parties involved; however, for those who were adopted during a time when records were sealed, the journey to discover their origins can be intricate and protracted.

A program designed to facilitate the sharing of restricted information

Julie details the process by which a sanctioned intermediary is granted approval to initiate contact with her birth mother. Julie composed a new letter to her biological mother, incorporating a questionnaire about health matters, following her mother's earlier refusal to divulge any personal information to her daughter. This was an unprecedented decision.

The ongoing legal disputes revolve around ensuring an adoptee's ability to discover their biological origins while respecting the birth parents' right to privacy.

Julie's narrative illustrates the pressure on states to revise laws governing adoption. A mother who has given birth might decide against initiating contact with the child she gave up for adoption, but the child still has the right to obtain their medical history. Ritchie's decision to undergo genetic testing contributed to the broader societal debate over balancing the privacy of birth parents with the right of adoptees to know their origins, a factor that also impacted Dick Thomlinson's decision to complete the health questionnaire but choose not to engage in additional dialogue with Julie.

Other Perspectives

• While the text emphasizes the challenges of sealed adoptions, it's important to recognize that some birth parents and adoptees may prefer sealed records for personal reasons, including a desire for privacy or to move on from past circumstances.
• The cultural norms of the 1950s that encouraged secrecy in adoptions were not universally supported or practiced, and there were individuals and organizations advocating for more openness even at that time.
• The stigma associated with pregnancies outside of marriage in the 1950s was not uniform across all communities or cultures within the United States, and some communities may have been more accepting than others.
• The complexity of adoption rules and systems is not solely a function of private adoption processes; state and international adoptions can also be complex and challenging for different reasons.
• The decision of birth parents like Shirley to keep pregnancies and adoptions secret may have been influenced by societal pressures, but it also could have been a personal choice that deserves respect.
• The narrative may not fully explore the potential positive outcomes of closed adoption policies, such as the protection of all parties involved from potential emotional harm or unwanted intrusion into their lives.
• The prioritization of biological parents' confidentiality over adoptees' rights to personal historical records can sometimes protect the well-being and wishes of birth parents who may have valid reasons for wanting to maintain privacy.
• Open adoptions, while beneficial in many cases, are not without their own set of challenges and complexities, and they may not be the best solution for every adoption scenario.
• The role of intermediaries in facilitating the sharing of restricted information can be seen as an invasion of privacy for some birth parents who wish to remain anonymous.
• Legal disputes regarding adoptees' rights and birth parents' privacy are complex, and there may be valid arguments for maintaining a birth parent's right to privacy even in the face of an adoptee's search for information.