PDF Summary:Totem and Taboo, by Sigmund Freud

In Totem and Taboo, Sigmund Freud explores the psychological underpinnings of rituals, cultural practices, and belief systems of indigenous communities. He delves into the complex emotions surrounding authority figures, especially father figures, arguing that societal taboos and moral codes arise from intricate feelings like respect and resentment towards patriarchal power.

Freud contends that totems—revered symbols typically derived from animals—represent symbolic substitutes for the father figure. The rituals and prohibitions involving totems allow the expression and regulation of ambivalent emotions, including the desire for the father's authority yet the longing to overthrow it.

(continued)...

Freud recognizes that people in primitive communities possess complex emotions towards their rulers, particularly the person leading the group. These figures, embodying strength and authority, both inspire admiration and evoke resentment. The community esteems its leader for safeguarding their welfare, but this admiration can occasionally lead to feelings of jealousy and competition. The father figure, while providing love and support in his capacity as a protector and provider, can also be perceived as a barrier to his offspring's desires for independence and autonomy because of his position of authority.

Restrictive taboos emerge as a means to harmonize conflicting emotional drives.

Freud suggests that our ambivalent feelings toward authority figures are internal conflicts that become apparent through the creation of numerous prohibitions and restrictions. Strict prohibitions, often referred to as taboos, serve to mitigate aggressive impulses and foster feelings of deep respect and esteem. The existence of a taboo inherently implies a natural tendency to engage in the actions it forbids. Individuals can attribute limitations to external circumstances, rather than acknowledging their internal conflicts, to distinguish between their wishes and actions. Projecting the internal conflict outward diminishes the psychological tension associated with ambivalent emotions, thus creating a sense of equilibrium and resolution.

The ban on approaching the leader's dwelling is likely rooted in a mix of envy for his exclusive privileges and fear of his power. The taboo functions to temper the aggressive tendencies of the tribe members directed at their leader while concurrently reinforcing his esteemed position among them. Looking directly at the leader, which is frequently forbidden in many cultures, acts as a barrier against the inclination to challenge his authority, possibly arising from hidden jealousy.

The concept of a child harboring feelings of longing for their mother and rivalry with their father, known as the Oedipus complex, acts as a principal trigger for these conflicting sentiments.

Freud underscores the profound impact of the Oedipus complex on the intricate feelings and struggles related to the paternal archetype. In his examination of psychosexual growth, Freud delves into the deep-seated desire a boy holds for the affection of his mother and the rivalrous feelings he possesses towards his father. The competition with the father figure fosters a complex blend of affection and antagonism, emotions that frequently persist into mature years, though they become more refined and complex.

Freud suggests that the lasting impact of the initial Oedipal conflict, encountered by everyone in their formative years, plays a crucial role in forming the norms and ethics of society. He argues that the powerful emotions associated with this complex persist beyond their original situation, becoming embedded in our psyche and shaping the ethical framework that steers our moral choices. Societal norms and prohibitions, particularly those concerning sexual and aggressive impulses towards authority figures, function to control and mitigate deep-seated Oedipal impulses by serving as an external manifestation of this internal conflict.

In early communal cultures, restrictions against incest serve to alleviate and regulate underlying hostility towards figures of parental authority.

In this section, Freud delves into the complex interplay of ethical restrictions within early societies, specifically highlighting how the ban on incest exemplifies these principles. He argues that these restrictions are not limited to the regulation of sexual behavior but also include the control of deep-seated and often unconscious resentment towards figures of paternal authority.

To mitigate feelings of remorse associated with the yearning to supplant the father figure's authority, early communities established strict bans on incest and similar transgressions.

Freud posits that the strict moral codes adhered to by ancient societies, particularly in relation to the avoidance of incestuous relationships, have implications that surpass the mere prevention of negative genetic consequences. They primarily function to mitigate the internal feelings of remorse originating from the desire to take on the paternal role. The unresolved Oedipal complex serves as the source of certain emotions that persistently shape individuals' moral choices and social interactions from the depths of their subconscious.

Tribe members subconsciously compensate for their inherent desire to dethrone the patriarch by adhering to a strict set of restrictions and boundaries. Acknowledging the taboo serves as an implicit admission of the existence of the forbidden wish, thus providing a way to mitigate feelings of guilt. The more rigorously a taboo is observed, the more it indicates the intensity of the underlying desire it represents. The method symbolically appeases the father figure's authority and simultaneously curbs the inclination towards aggression.

Freud firmly believes that the ban on unions between close kin is rooted in motives separate from the awareness of genetic hazards linked to reproduction among closely related individuals. He emphasizes that, against anticipated beliefs, the most intense repulsion to incestuous relationships is observed in the most ancient communities. He further underscores the intense emotional reaction that contemporary individuals exhibit at the mere suggestion of incest, which goes beyond any rational concerns about genetic consequences. Freud interprets this excessive reaction as indicative of an underlying, subconscious cause – a cause that is entangled with the unresolved Oedipal conflict.

Primitive religious rituals emerged as a means to soothe and mitigate the antagonistic emotions directed toward the archetypal father figure.

Freud delves into the core elements of taboo, linking them to the fundamental aspects of religious faith. He interprets religious practices as a symbolic and expansive endeavor to reconcile with and pacify the archetypal father figure. He suggests that the fear of supernatural beings, the rituals performed to appease them, and the desire for a benevolent god all stem from the intricate emotions associated with symbols of fatherhood.

Early rituals often symbolize a reenactment through various sacrificial ceremonies of the initial conflict. Offering a sacrifice, be it an animal or a symbolic item, functions as a stand-in for the symbol of the father. The ritualistic killing and communal consumption, though ostensibly aimed at appeasing deities, also symbolize the unspoken desire to overthrow the father figure's power and absorb his vigor. Freud suggests that spiritual experiences are meticulously shaped by a nuanced interplay of reverence and resistance, coupled with emotions that drive an individual towards seeking atonement and resolution.

Other Perspectives

• The universality of the Oedipus complex is debated; many cultures do not exhibit the same familial dynamics or taboos that Freud identified, suggesting that his theory may be culturally specific rather than universally applicable.
• The formation of social and moral structures can also be explained through other theories such as social contract theory, evolutionary psychology, and cultural anthropology, which do not rely on psychoanalytic principles.
• The emphasis on paternal figures in the formation of societal norms may overlook the role of maternal figures and other social influences in different cultures.
• The interpretation of taboos as mechanisms to control emotional drives related to the Oedipal complex is just one perspective; taboos may also arise from practical considerations such as health, safety, and resource management.
• The idea that restrictions against incest primarily serve to regulate emotions towards parental figures can be countered by genetic and evolutionary explanations, which suggest that such taboos help prevent inbreeding and its associated genetic risks.
• The psychoanalytic framework often relies on unobservable and untestable constructs, which makes it difficult to empirically validate or falsify Freud's theories.
• The notion that primitive religious rituals are directly connected to the resolution of Oedipal tensions may ignore the multifaceted nature of religious practices, which can also be interpreted through the lens of social cohesion, myth-making, and the human search for meaning.

Totemism represents the bond shared between a father and his offspring.

This section delves into the mental foundations and the impact on the social structure and belief systems widely observed among various native populations, known as totemism. Freud is fascinated by totemism, not just due to its ceremonial aspects but also because it embodies the complex symbolism associated with the enduring emotional tensions between a father and his children, which are connected to the unresolved feelings that arise from the Oedipal complex.

The totemic entity represents a symbolic substitute for the father figure.

Freud applies psychoanalytic principles alongside anthropological data, suggesting that the totem animal is highly esteemed and serves as an important symbolic representation of the father figure archetype. The intricate mix of emotions it elicits, including admiration, apprehension, dependence, and resentment, reflects the multifaceted emotional connection that a child has with their father figure.

The entity represented by the totem is approached with a blend of reverence and wariness, similar to the feelings one would have towards a father figure.

Animals that serve as totems are typically viewed with a mixture of reverence and wariness, mirroring the intricate emotions one may hold for a father figure. The clan views the totem as a protector of their lineage that imparts strength and identity. It is necessary to proceed with care, as inciting its anger might lead to disaster. The totemic animal exists within a setting characterized by stringent restrictions and a profound sense of conflicting emotions.

Just as the head of a household sets the rules and structure for his family, so too does the totemic animal define the moral code and social order for the community. The totem's authority, comparable to a father's, remains unquestioned, with violations promptly punished. The totemic emblem carries deep psychological significance, representing not just a revered animal but also embodying the powerful father figure, assisting the tribe in dealing with the complex emotions associated with this entity.

Killing and consuming the totem animal represents an attempt to incorporate the father's power and authority

A central aspect of these important ceremonies is the ceremonial killing and eating of the creature that represents the totem. Freud sees this contradictory conduct as a sign of the inner conflict that stems from the desire of sons to both overthrow and imitate their father figures.

The act of killing the totem serves as a symbolic reenactment of the original act of patricide. The offspring joined forces to overcome the immense authority represented by their ancestor. Consuming the symbolic figure of the clan, particularly in its raw form and vital fluids, symbolizes the sons' attempt to absorb the father's power and essence, incorporating it into their own being. The sense of power and control it provides is fleeting, yet it simultaneously strengthens the group's connection to their symbolic totem, reinforcing their collective unity and shared purpose.

The prohibitions linked to totems, such as the prohibition against injuring or eating the totemic animal, reflect the intricate feelings felt towards the symbol of the father.

This part delves into the deep psychological importance of seemingly random restrictions linked to totemic symbols. Freud attributes these rules to the enduring, unresolved conflict between fathers and their sons, rather than to efforts at conservation or arbitrary social conventions.

The totemic structure closely links the dread of incest with its forbiddance and the connections between a father and his offspring.

In numerous totemic systems, the fundamental ban on incest is closely linked with the interactions that involve the prevailing male power. Freud proposes that such behavior is not merely an avoidance of adverse biological repercussions but stems from the son's inherent Oedipal struggles, which give rise to feelings of guilt and anxiety.

The prohibition of sexual relations in the totem clan represents the repressed desire of a son towards his mother. Sons subconsciously compensate for their Oedipal desires by steering clear of intimate relationships with women in their own community, who evoke similarities to motherly figures. The self-imposed limitation, upheld by severe social penalties, serves to alleviate the guilt stemming from the innate desire to usurp paternal dominance. The prohibition serves a practical purpose as well, strengthening the bonds within the community and diminishing competition over women within the clan, which in turn maintains brotherly peace and averts conflicts that might weaken their united force.

The rituals and long-established traditions linked to the totem serve as symbolic re-creations of the primal patricide and the ensuing sense of guilt experienced by the offspring.

Freud suggests that the variety of rituals associated with the totemic entity, particularly the ritualistic sacrifices, act as a conduit for the repressed emotions that originate from the primal patricide. The community continually fortifies its cohesion through the symbolic and intentional reenactment of a narrative that addresses their collective feelings of remorse.

The elaborate ceremonies involving the clan's symbolic animal's death, characterized by mournful cries, fervent dancing, and the ceremonial wearing of animal skins, represent the sons' remorse over the killing of the patriarch and their continued remembrance of their shared triumph. These ceremonial practices offer a community-approved avenue for the expression and regulation of these ambivalent feelings, ensuring they are channeled constructively and safely within a structured setting. Freud posits that the lasting impact of the totemic system stems from the ritualistic replaying of the essential discord.

The societal practices linked to the totem represent a communal expression of the Oedipus complex.

Freud argues that the system of totems is a complex and sophisticated cultural expression of the Oedipal conflict found universally in human experiences. This structure provides a solid foundation in social and spiritual settings for managing and guiding the intricate feelings of affection, animosity, desire, and remorse that link sons to their paternal figures.

The sons simultaneously honor and supplant the father figure by replacing him with a totemic symbol.

Freud proposes that a powerful psychological mechanism is set in motion which simultaneously obliterates and preserves the fundamental essence of the father by symbolizing him via the totemic creature. The sons channeled their collective hostility by symbolically killing the totem, an act that represented the initial slaying of the father. The totemic figure is revered, thereby elevating the father figure to a status akin to that of a deity.

The method enables the expression and management of the conflicting impulses of the sons. They utilize the totem to convey their complex feelings, which encompass both grief and reverence for the father, and embody a duality of defiance and submission to his authority. The totem symbolizes both strength and weakness, permanence and susceptibility, mirroring the intricate dynamics between a father and his offspring.

The Oedipal complex's intense urges were subdued and transformed, leading to the creation of fundamental frameworks for social and religious institutions.

Freud posits that the evolution of religious and societal frameworks in primitive communities is deeply connected to the management and direction of hostile instincts originating from familial bonds, which are exemplified by the dynamics similar to those found in the Oedipus complex. Freud suggests that driven by their libidinal and hostile impulses, the sons collaborate to overthrow the tyrannical father figure at the helm of the original tribe. The slaying of the patriarch, though it established a community grounded on fraternal ties, simultaneously gave rise to an ingrained sense of remorse.

The sons, burdened by deep regret, establish a totemic system encompassing strict bans and rituals as a way to atone for their actions and to pursue harmony with their father. The prohibition against killing the totemic animal, representing the father figure, and the limitations on incestuous unions both signify the abandonment of desires that ignited their original rebellion. These internalized moral codes serve as the bedrock for early communal structures, promoting unity and averting a repeat of the initial discord.

Freud explores the origins of societal structures, underscoring the complex interplay between individual ambitions and the broader social systems. The book suggests that fundamental societal structures, although seemingly governed by logic, are firmly rooted in the subconscious layers of the human psyche. Freud posited that the persistent impact of the initial patricidal deed continues to shape our cultural and religious behaviors, illustrating how the narrative of humankind is profoundly shaped by the mental imprints of the Oedipus complex.

Other Perspectives

• The interpretation of totemism as a representation of the father-child bond is not universally accepted; many anthropologists argue that totemism can have a variety of meanings and functions in different cultures, not all of which relate to familial relationships.
• Freud's psychoanalytic approach to totemism, particularly the application of the Oedipus complex, has been criticized for being Eurocentric and for projecting Western psychological theories onto non-Western cultures without sufficient empirical evidence.
• The idea that the totemic entity serves as a substitute for the father figure is an interpretation that may not account for the diverse roles and meanings that totemic animals have in various societies, which can include elements of the environment, fertility, or other aspects not directly related to paternal symbolism.
• The reverence and wariness towards the totemic entity may not necessarily mirror feelings towards a father figure but could instead reflect a broader sense of respect for nature, spirits, or the sacred that is not specifically paternal in nature.
• The moral code and social order defined by the totemic animal may not be as directly comparable to the role of a father figure as Freud suggests; in many societies, totems may have more to do with group identity and interrelations with the natural world than with enforcing moral behavior.
• The act of killing and consuming the totem animal in some cultures is not universally interpreted as an attempt to incorporate the father's power; alternative explanations include strengthening the bond with the totem or ensuring the continuity of the totem's spirit.
• The prohibitions linked to totems, such as not injuring or eating the totemic animal, may have practical reasons such as conservation, respect for the totem as a kin or ally, or other cultural meanings that do not necessarily reflect unresolved paternal conflicts.
• The link between the dread of incest and the totemic structure may not be as direct as Freud's theory suggests; many cultures have incest taboos that are independent of totemic beliefs and practices.
• The rituals and traditions linked to the totem may not be symbolic re-creations of primal patricide but could serve other functions such as reinforcing group solidarity, marking seasonal cycles, or other cultural significances.
• The societal practices linked to the totem may not be a communal expression of the Oedipus complex but could instead represent a wide array of social, economic, and ecological relationships that are essential to the functioning of the society.
• The idea that sons honor and supplant the father figure with a totemic symbol is a specific psychoanalytic interpretation that may not reflect the actual intentions and beliefs of the people practicing totemism.
• The transformation of the Oedipal complex's urges into social and religious institutions is a theory that has been challenged for its lack of cross-cultural validity and for assuming a universal psychological development that may not apply to all societies.