PDF Summary:The Whiteness of Wealth, by Dorothy A. Brown

The Whiteness of Wealth by Dorothy A. Brown examines how U.S. tax policies disproportionately benefit white Americans while impeding wealth accumulation for Black families. The book presents a thorough analysis of tax implications on various aspects such as marital status, home ownership, education financing, and intergenerational wealth transfer.

Brown explores how tax deductions, exemptions, and preferential rates cater to financial situations more common among white households. This contrasts with the unique economic challenges faced by many African American families—from marriage tax penalties and barriers to home equity, to the burdens of student loan debt. The book sheds light on deep-rooted systemic factors contributing to racial wealth disparities.

(continued)...

The tax system contributes to the growing wealth gap between races by imposing taxes on gains from the sale of homes.

Tax-free home sale gains are more readily available to white homeowners

Homeowners are permitted by Section 121 of the Internal Revenue Code to exclude a significant portion of the profits from the sale of their primary residence from their taxable income, provided certain conditions are met. The law offers significant benefits to white homeowners by permitting them to earn profits from their home sales, with potential gains up to half a million dollars exempt from taxes.

Homeowners who are African American often experience a decrease in their property values, resulting in financial disadvantages when they opt to sell, especially if their homes are situated in predominantly Black neighborhoods or in communities experiencing demographic changes or gentrification.

The usual limitations in the tax code that prevent the deduction of losses incurred from home sales often disproportionately impact Black homeowners.

Historical and ongoing biases in the housing market frequently lead to a situation where black families are unable to benefit from a tax deduction when they incur losses from selling their homes. Tax policies exacerbate the situation by enhancing the equity of white property owners, advantages that frequently do not extend to African American homeowners.

Tax rules allowing the deduction of interest on home equity loans when the borrowed money is used for enhancing the property tend to disproportionately benefit white homeowners, as these individuals are often in a position to take on larger mortgages. The enduring consequences of historical discrimination, along with other factors, lead to significant and persistent differences in homeownership and the related financial advantages in the property market.

Racial disparities are particularly evident in the accumulation of wealth, especially in the areas of higher education and career progression, as well as the economic outcomes that follow.

Recent studies highlight the pervasive disparities based on race within the realms of higher education and professional success, further intensified by the taxation policies. In this article, we'll delve into the scarcity of Black students at prestigious, highly-funded institutions of higher education, and scrutinize the inadequate support provided by tax policies to Black students who often bear a heavier burden of educational loans.

Prestigious universities with abundant resources often have a significantly small number of African American students enrolled.

Selective institutions of higher education benefit from substantial tax benefits, yet they struggle to attract and Ensure the steady involvement of pupils who are African American.

Elite institutions of higher education gain considerable advantages by being exempt from federal taxation on their endowment profits. Despite this, these institutions encounter difficulties in attracting and retaining the engagement of Black students. Elite private schools, known for enrolling a disproportionately low number of Black students, effectively gather resources that might have otherwise benefited less wealthy colleges with higher numbers of Black enrollees. Students hailing from diverse ethnic backgrounds often find themselves in educational institutions that lack sufficient resources.

White students are five times more likely than their Black peers to enroll in a prestigious institution. White Americans with higher incomes are four times more likely to attend elite educational institutions than their Black counterparts. The composition of the student population in numerous higher education institutions has grown more varied, yet the percentage of African American students attending elite universities has stayed the same for more than thirty years. Experts such as Jon Boeckenstedt suggest that these institutions possess the capability to admit students who are academically exceptional and qualify for federal financial aid, and they can achieve this without levying tuition charges.

White families tend to benefit more from tax-advantaged college savings accounts.

Tax-advantaged college savings accounts, such as 529 plans, typically offer the greatest benefits to families that are predominantly white. White families not only make up the majority of those who take advantage of these accounts, but they also generally maintain a significantly higher average balance in their 529 plans than Black families.

Differences in savings for college are rooted in broader historical and systemic factors that have resulted in the accumulation of wealth among white families and their more consistent ability to benefit from tax incentives for higher education.

The fiscal structure provides little relief for the often larger amounts of student loan debt that Black students commonly bear.

Black graduates often end up with higher levels of student loan debt than their white peers, impeding their ability to build wealth.

Student loan debt often imposes a greater burden on Black graduates than on their white peers. On average, Black college graduates tend to have student loan debts that surpass the amounts owed by white graduates by approximately $7,400, a disparity that often widens over time. Affluent Black households often find themselves contributing less to their children's higher education expenses than white families, resulting in Black graduates shouldering a greater burden of student loan debt. The build-up of this debt impedes the growth of wealth and intensifies the wealth gap among different racial groups.

The deduction for interest on student loans offers scant relief to individuals burdened with substantial debt.

The tax code permits a reduction in taxable income for interest paid on student loans as outlined in IRC $221(b)(1), but this offers only slight alleviation. The problem of significant educational debt persists, especially affecting students of color more than their counterparts. Deductions in taxes offer only slight alleviation and do not address the fundamental reasons that lead to Black students accumulating greater amounts of debt from the start. Even students of color hailing from affluent backgrounds are not shielded from the challenges associated with these debts, highlighting the issue's deep connection to the racially biased distribution of wealth.

In summary, the amalgamation of adequately resourced educational institutions, the employment of tax-advantaged savings accounts, and the economic ramifications tied to student debt together continue to sustain the persistent gaps in financial resources across different racial groups within the spheres of education and career success. Current tax policies exacerbate these disparities by offering benefits that are predominantly accessed by white families, which in turn continues the cycle of disadvantage for Black students and graduates.

The enduring racial wealth gap is shaped by the legacy of wealth and investment strategies that are handed down through family generations.

An examination of the factors that perpetuate the unequal accumulation of wealth among different races, emphasizing the impact of inheritance and investment strategies on this issue.

Tax laws designed to ease the passing down of assets within families tend to benefit households that are mainly composed of white individuals.

In the United States, white families frequently benefit from substantial inheritances or gifts that are not subject to taxes, in contrast to black families who typically do not receive such tax-exempt transfers. White families have a median wealth of $171,000, in stark contrast to black families, whose median wealth is just $17,100. The wealthiest 10 percent of white households, in comparison, have an average wealth amounting to $6.7 million, which stands in stark contrast to their black counterparts whose average wealth just surpasses $1 million.

The tax system intensifies these disparities by allowing contributions that are not subject to tax, such as direct payments for educational expenses, which are more frequently utilized by affluent white families. Legislation related to taxes has been designed to support the accumulation of wealth across multiple generations. For example, a descendant who represents the fourth lineage to enroll in a prestigious Ivy League school discussed how her grandfather created funds that covered the educational expenses for her and her siblings, highlighting the enduring inequality.

Families are able to give and receive financial support without triggering any tax obligations due to the provisions allowing for transfers that are exempt from income tax. Under the federal estate and gift tax regulations, an individual can transfer substantial sums—$15,000 to each recipient annually as of 2020, and a combined total of $11.58 million during their lifetime or at death without incurring taxes. Moreover, due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017, this exemption amount is doubled for married couples.

The Bzdells, a middle-class family of Caucasian background, benefited from loans provided by relatives which helped them buy a home, and later inherited an estate that included approximately $1 million in stocks and at least $300,000 in cash. The preferential tax policies regarding gifts and inheritances play a significant role in the growth of wealth within white families.

The foundational concept underpinning the computation of taxes carries substantial importance. The rule allows for the passing down of appreciated assets to future generations without imposing taxes on them. An individual who inherits assets, for instance stocks or real estate, has the option to sell them at the prevailing market rate, usually circumventing the need to pay federal income taxes on the increased value. This rule particularly benefits wealthy white families, such as the Brewsters, who were able to inherit and sell property with a fair market value basis rule, avoiding significant taxes.

The disparity in wealth is intensified by the uneven allocation of stock ownership and the differing investment returns among various racial groups.

White Americans hold a disproportionate amount of stocks and other capital assets, further entrenching racial wealth disparities. Capital gains tax rates usually favor those who are more affluent.

An investigation into the allocation of equity investments among wealthy Americans shows that 30 percent of affluent Black individuals hold stock, whereas this percentage increases to 41 percent among white individuals of similar financial standing. Moreover, African American investors who are among the top five percent have assets that amount to less than half of what their white counterparts in the same economic bracket control. The imbalance is perpetuated by tax policies that are more beneficial to the financial practices of white Americans, which includes the pivotal court decision that set the current tax benchmark for stocks and bonds.

Capital gains, which are more frequently possessed by white Americans, benefit from lower tax rates, thus enabling increased savings and the accumulation of wealth. The vast majority of the income that qualifies for the reduced preferential rate is amassed by the top 5 percent of earners, signifying a significant accumulation of wealth.

Susan, a white woman, witnessed the growth of her initial investment in a fast-food franchise from the 1960s into a diverse collection of assets now worth $8 million, which illustrates the impact of such economic inequalities. Wealth accumulation is facilitated by tax policies that tend to favor white individuals more than others.

Tax laws and investment options create a perpetuating loop that allows individuals, who are mainly white, to grow their wealth and pass it down through family lines while often circumventing substantial tax liabilities, thereby intensifying the obstacles that minority households, especially those of black families, face in their pursuit to close the wealth gap. Homes located in predominantly white areas often experience substantial appreciation, boosting the financial status of the homeowners and frequently leading to sizable profits that are not subject to tax when sold.

In summary, the enduring racial wealth disparity is significantly influenced by the substantial benefits that white families accrue from tax policies, inherited wealth, and the favorable handling of their investments. The structures in place inherently favor those already on top, hence perpetuating an imbalance that has persisted for centuries.