PDF Summary:The Toyota Way Fieldbook, by Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier

Lean manufacturing is a philosophy focused on maximizing value and minimizing waste. In The Toyota Way Fieldbook, Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier examine Toyota's implementation of lean principles, providing actionable guidance for streamlining processes and promoting continuous improvement.

The book explores concepts like value stream mapping, takt time, and identifying the seven forms of waste. It details how to foster problem-solving, standardize work, and cultivate strong supplier relationships. The authors also reveal Toyota's leadership and employee engagement strategies that empower workers to drive operational excellence.

(continued)...

Establishing connections between different processes through the application of the pull principle.

The authors characterize a pull system as an approach that functions by reacting to the demands of customers. The authors stress the importance of distinguishing a pull system from the concept of flow, even though they share similarities, and suggest that flow describes the movement of materials starting with the customer and moving towards the supplier. The fundamental concept of the pull system is reflected in how the flow and quantity of products are dictated by the needs of the customer.

Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier outline three critical elements necessary to implement a pull system: precise definition, steadfast dedication, and competent leadership. A clear system must be implemented to ensure that adherence to the agreement is transparent, with resources allocated and areas for connections defined, and that oversight is in place to make this adherence evident to everyone. The authors use the analogy of a bucket brigade to explain the trio of elements that constitute a single-piece-flow scenario. They also stress the importance of meticulously observing the expertise embedded within single-piece flow processes to guarantee that any deviation from the standard practices is easily detectable. The authors further elucidate the role these elements play in creating an automated system that improves the performance and productivity of processes involving machines.

Implement the single-piece flow method where it is appropriate and beneficial, aiming to eradicate waste entirely instead of depending on batch processing.

Improving the efficiency of a production system often focuses on establishing a workflow that progresses individual units in a sequential manner. The production process is optimized for peak efficiency through the adoption of a system that ensures continuous flow of single units, thereby minimizing surplus production and keeping the work-in-progress inventory at the lowest possible level. Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier offer guidance in this pursuit and highlight two critical elements to take into account: Operations with rapid cycle times might not always benefit from single-piece flow, as it can lead to inefficiencies associated with the constant manipulation of components. The efficiency of a machine can be improved by manufacturing multiple components at the same time rather than being limited to the production of a single component per cycle. The primary focus, as highlighted by Liker and Meier, must be on waste elimination, and the evaluation of adopting a single-piece flow should be considered with this essential priority in perspective.

Employing visual cues and established procedures to oversee the progression of workflow.

Liker and Meier explain how visual indicators, such as kanban or FIFO lanes, can be used to control connected processes, regulate inventory levels, prevent overproduction and communicate customer requirements to suppliers. The authors delve deeper into how visual tools are employed to monitor and control process efficiency. A readily noticeable issue often prompts an immediate reaction and swift solution. The authors caution that an overreliance on visual cues, such as stack lights that could be misinterpreted without explicit instructions, may result in these signals being overlooked, thereby reducing the typically clear, direct, and unmistakable impact of visual controls.

Establish and document uniform procedures through the implementation of standards.

Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier stress the importance of standardization as a key factor in ensuring consistent performance, noting that the path to continuous improvement begins with the establishment of a stable process. Standardization is often misinterpreted as a way to maximize worker efficiency by imposing a strict, authoritarian structure that suppresses employee creativity and innovation, when in fact it represents one of the most frequently misapplied and misconstrued concepts within the lean manufacturing philosophy.

Creating standards as a foundation is crucial for continuous improvement.

Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier argue that standardization is the foundation of continuous improvement, also referred to as kaizen. Improvements that focus solely on a single phase of the process do not impact the organization as a whole. Without standardization, individuals might improve their own approaches to work, yet the dissemination of this knowledge is limited to isolated interactions. Standardized processes encapsulate collective wisdom, allowing individual improvements and innovative concepts to be integrated into a unified structure that establishes the basis for continuous system advancement. The authors convey their message effectively by likening the situation to that of an experienced carpenter who, without fear of being replaced by a beginner who discovers his tools, leaves them readily available for others to use.

It's crucial to differentiate between a standard that prioritizes cost reduction and one that truly contributes value.

Managers often concentrate on establishing standardized methods for cost management by utilizing time and motion studies to set benchmarks for task performance. The authors highlight that the Toyota Way prioritizes the enhancement of the entire production flow, aiming to reduce total costs through the diligent removal of waste, rather than concentrating on individual productivity and the cost per unit as the primary indicator of success. Traditional methods utilize time and motion analysis to determine the most efficient process and set a precise time standard for the task to gauge employee productivity. This creates an adversarial dynamic of “one-upsmanship” between workers and managers that is focused on the “numbers,” not on working together to create a truly efficient, effective system and a superior product.

Toyota distinguishes between the objectives of standardized work and the intended outcomes of work standards. The assessment of each employee's output is measured in comparison to predefined benchmarks of work. Toyota's objective is to manufacture products of superior quality at the highest level of cost-effectiveness through a system that prioritizes waste reduction and considers standardization fundamental to improvement. Creating benchmarks is considered a critical initial step on the path to continuous improvement, with the expectation that future results will exceed these initial standards. Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier depict the approach to standardization as one that challenges traditional methods, embodying a contradiction.

Reviewing the documentation for established procedures fulfills this role.

Standardized work documents are primarily utilized for analytical purposes, as pointed out by Liker and Meier. To improve efficiency, understanding the workflow is crucial for completing the process of documentation. Identifying inefficiencies plays a key role in developing a strategy that targets their complete removal from the fundamental process. The authors emphasize the importance of embedding quality, safety, and environmental standards into regular work processes, which include the utilization of three key documents: the chart for standardized work, the table for combining standardized tasks, and the sheet detailing production capacity.

Standardized work is distinct from work standards.

A common misunderstanding is that standardized work is synonymous with work standards. Work protocols are frequently misunderstood, acting as a standard for commending employees who exceed expectations and as a means to admonish those who do not meet them. Toyota's methodology is built upon the continuous improvement of operations and the empowerment of their employees. Standardized work documents function as a universally understood method of communication. They lay the groundwork for future improvements.

Utilizing visual tools to enhance adherence to set protocols.

Liker and Meier underscore the importance of employing visual tools as essential instruments for establishing and maintaining standardized procedures. Visual control is fundamentally designed to define what is considered 'normal,' thereby allowing for the quick detection of any deviations from this standard. The authors highlight the intricate nature of processes that include numerous details beyond what can be memorized, thus rendering a written manual inadequate for instant verification of adherence to set standards. Without a clear and measurable standard, pinpointing variances can be difficult, which may result in regular incidents that obstruct true advancement. In Chapter 6, Liker and Meier outline a situation in which the assembly line often experienced disruptions stemming from complications that occurred while positioning components on the painting line. Despite the establishment of guidelines, the operators did not consistently follow them. The introduction of a visual board made the standard clear, which decreased interruptions on the production line and greatly enhanced efficiency.

Continuously assess and refine established procedures to ensure any problems are promptly identified and resolved.

Establishing a standardized process extends beyond merely completing the documentation. Standardized work is continually subject to evolution and modification. The assessment of how a process functions is fundamentally based on this principle. The book is filled with examples demonstrating the methods Toyota uses to evaluate its standardized work processes, as explained by Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier. Confronting challenges directly marks the beginning stage. When an issue arises or a component is found to be faulty, one initial step is to scrutinize the process and confirm that it aligns with the established standard. The authors recommend that attributing errors too hastily to the behavior of operators and conducting audits in a confrontational environment can establish a basis for conflict and tension. This confrontational method could result in a reluctance to deeply investigate problems, possibly allowing the root causes to remain hidden, which might subsequently lead to the repetition of the same challenges. Assessing established procedures is crucial for maintaining uniformity in operations within a setting committed to minimizing waste and improving service to customers. Toyota places a high emphasis on regularly evaluating their processes to guarantee the steadfast application of the most efficient techniques.

Other Perspectives

• While consistency and uniform procedures are important, over-standardization can stifle creativity and innovation, which are also valuable in a dynamic business environment.
• A stable environment is beneficial, but too much emphasis on stability may prevent a company from adapting quickly to changes in the market or technology.
• Instruments for creating uniformity, like the 5S system, can be helpful, but they may not be suitable for all types of work or industries, especially those that require a high degree of customization.
• Minimizing fluctuations is important, but some level of variability can be inherent and even beneficial in certain processes, fostering flexibility and responsiveness.
• A smooth transition between processes is ideal, but in some cases, batch processing may be more efficient or practical than continuous flow, depending on the context and scale of operations.
• The pull principle is effective in many scenarios, but it may not be the best approach in situations with unpredictable demand or where the cost of stockouts is very high.
• Single-piece flow reduces waste, but it may not be the most efficient method for all types of production, particularly where economies of scale can be achieved through batch processing.
• Visual cues are useful, but they can become cluttered or ignored if not properly maintained, and they may not be sufficient in complex processes that require detailed instructions.
• Standardization is key for improvement, but it must be balanced with the need for flexibility and the ability to customize when necessary.
• Focusing on value-adding standards is important, but cost reduction is also a legitimate and necessary goal for businesses to remain competitive.
• Reviewing documentation is crucial, but it can become a bureaucratic process that consumes resources without adding value if not done judiciously.
• Standardized work differs from work standards, but in practice, the distinction can become blurred, leading to rigidity and a lack of engagement from workers.
• Continuous assessment and refinement of procedures are necessary, but there is a risk of change fatigue among employees if changes are too frequent or not well-justified.

Fostering collaborative relationships to improve the efficiency of supply networks.

Fostering cooperative relationships with suppliers.

Toyota nurtures a unique relationship with its suppliers, creating a mutually beneficial bond that is often envied and sought after by other companies. The process of copying their methods was complex.

The company fosters long-lasting collaborations with its suppliers.

Traditional management of partnerships with suppliers typically prioritizes cost minimization, incentivizes top performance, and imposes consequences on those who fall short. Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier describe Toyota's method as a hierarchical structure that starts with a basic comprehension and progresses towards ongoing collaborative endeavors, emphasizing steady enhancement and the sharing of insights throughout the organization. The hierarchical alliance framework encapsulates the core tenets of the Toyota Way. They understand that developing deep and meaningful relationships with their suppliers is a long-term commitment that cannot be achieved simply by implementing a few lean techniques or imposing cost reductions.

Moving focus from simply reducing the expense of single components to assessing the total costs while nurturing mutual benefits.

Toyota places a high value on establishing a reliable relationship with its suppliers. They work together to achieve common goals, including low cost, high quality, and innovation. Suppliers acknowledge the benefits of their collaboration with Toyota, contributing to their shared economic success. Suppliers are treated fairly without being exploited to obtain the greatest possible discounts. Long-term stability was the focus of the investments made.

Toyota cultivates long-term relationships with its suppliers rather than simply seeking the lowest-cost alternatives worldwide. Toyota meticulously evaluates whether potential suppliers share its core values and principles to ensure they are in harmony with the company's practices. Toyota is committed to fostering a long-term, reciprocal partnership with a supplier when they recognize that the supplier's values are in harmony with their own. The authors strengthen their case by presenting the example of a company located in Monterrey, Mexico. Toyota actively fostered a collaborative relationship with the new supplier, and even though the initial component costs were higher, Metalsa has continued to be a reliable supplier for a long duration.

Establishing a cohesive structure that connects the operational activities of your company with the procedures of your suppliers.

Toyota views its suppliers as essential partners in its manufacturing operations and is dedicated to providing them with thorough training in the Toyota Production System, ensuring that their processes, policies, and methods are fully aligned with Toyota's standards. Toyota, however, permits its suppliers to willingly embrace their system. The authors caution against reducing Toyota's approach to a mere unveiling of a specialized process. Suppliers must demonstrate the same level of commitment and proactively engage in necessary actions to achieve excellence in managing costs, enhance product quality, ensure prompt delivery, and promote innovation.

The book authored by Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier references Johnson Controls as an example of a company that has a longstanding supply relationship with Toyota. Johnson Controls is prepared to expand its operations to accommodate the increasing volume of business. Toyota exercises control over its expansion, ensuring it does not occur without oversight. They encouraged Johnson Controls to devise strategies for producing the new products within their current plant while also enhancing productivity. They subsequently provided help. Toyota developed a collaborative relationship with Johnson Control, characterized by a durable trust that has grown stronger over time through numerous joint projects. Suppliers that embrace lean principles tend to maintain profitability and ensure their long-term business success, a concept well comprehended by Toyota.

Embracing the perspective of value stream mapping is essential for developing a lean supply chain.

Establishing a robust network of suppliers is a complex and challenging task. Navigating the complexities of logistics goes beyond just sourcing materials from a variety of suppliers in China who offer competitive prices. The method views the supply chain as an integrated entity, acknowledging that inefficiencies at any point indicate waste throughout the entire network, from raw material suppliers to the final consumers.

Identifying the core competencies of your organization.

To establish an effective supply chain, it is crucial to identify and thoroughly document the core competencies of the business, which encompass the technology and expertise that must be retained internally. The authors detail Toyota's decision to cultivate the necessary technology in-house for the production of the IGBT, a vital component in the assembly of the new Prius hybrid vehicle. Toyota adopted this strategy to maintain control over a crucial technology that was considered essential for the company's ongoing success. A firm that relies on external suppliers for the creation of crucial technology may find itself beholden to those suppliers for future enhancements, thus limiting its own ability to innovate. Embracing this method does not necessitate an absolute, total dedication. Toyota may develop expertise within the company before entrusting it to dependable partners who have shown comparable skill levels.

Fostering collaborative relationships with essential suppliers whose systems and expertise are in harmony with our requirements.

After refining its core operation and identifying its primary advantages, the company should judiciously select a small number of essential suppliers to oversee major portions of the value chain. Jeffrey K. Liker and David Meier advise suppliers to develop frameworks, values, and skills that are in harmony with their customers' and show a willingness to collaborate. The authors recommend exercising caution at the start of a supplier partnership by confirming that the company has fully integrated the Toyota Way's principles, as demonstrated by an instance where a complex lighting assembly was contracted out to the lowest bidder, which resulted in the unforeseen need to air-ship components from a far-off location, ultimately incurring greater total expenses than if a nearby supplier with marginally higher per-unit prices but more compatible manufacturing methods had been selected.

Efficient information dissemination and the provision of robust support.

Liker and Meier argue that the improvement of vehicle development and production is deeply reliant on the extensive exchange of information, underscoring that the financial efficiencies anticipated at Toyota cannot be achieved solely by making incremental improvements to manufacturing processes. Initial costs for designing a new product are only part of the equation, as the expenses for engineering changes after the product's release can be significant, especially when such changes affect all stages of the supply network and production process. The authors advise initiating the involvement of component manufacturers early in the product development process to prevent the wasteful use of time and resources. The authors elaborate on the methodical approach Toyota employs to facilitate the exchange of pertinent information between customers and suppliers at predetermined times and locations, effectively reducing the dissemination of unnecessary information that often plagues traditional organizations.

Cultivate a culture within the organization that persistently pursues shared improvement and development.

Developing a true collaborative partnership relies on a mutual journey of education. Toyota recognizes that the impact of integrating experts within the supplier tier of the Toyota Production System is not without boundaries, which is why they prioritize a teaching and guidance approach that motivates suppliers to take charge of their own developmental path. The aim is to cultivate an attitude centered on problem-solving and process improvement rather than simply implementing certain techniques or procedures. The authors illustrate Toyota's mentorship strategy with a variety of instances, such as their method for identifying suppliers that possess particular skills, known as the "Request for Design and Development Process," and their substantial commitment to educating suppliers in lean manufacturing techniques by providing practical training.

Other Perspectives

• While Toyota's approach to supplier relationships emphasizes long-term collaboration, it may not be as adaptable to rapidly changing market conditions where flexibility and the ability to quickly switch suppliers can be advantageous.
• Assessing total costs and nurturing mutual benefits with suppliers can lead to higher initial costs, which may not be feasible for smaller companies with tighter budget constraints.
• The cohesive structure that Toyota establishes with its suppliers requires a significant investment in time and resources, which may not yield immediate financial benefits and could be seen as a disadvantage by companies looking for quicker returns.
• Value stream mapping is a complex process that may not be easily understood or implemented by all organizations, especially smaller ones with less experience in lean methodologies.
• Identifying and documenting core competencies can lead to a rigid organizational structure that may stifle innovation and adaptability in some cases.
• Focusing on a small number of essential suppliers could create a dependency that may become a liability if any of those suppliers face disruptions.
• Efficient information dissemination and robust support systems require a high level of organizational discipline and may not be practical for all companies, particularly those with less structured management practices.
• Cultivating a culture of shared improvement and development assumes a level of engagement and commitment from suppliers that may not always be present, potentially leading to uneven results in the application of lean principles.

Leadership methods are undergoing significant changes.

It is impossible to overemphasize the vital role that committed leadership plays in the shift toward a lean culture.

The authors stress the importance of a profound cultural shift within an organization to thoroughly integrate lean principles into its processes, which requires steadfast commitment from leadership at every level.

The success of the transformation hinges on the active support and drive from individuals in top management roles.

The shift towards a lean system is described by Liker and Meier as a process that is fundamentally political, stemming from the varying goals and priorities of those involved. People with the perception that their interests are at risk might possess the ability to substantially obstruct the progress. Traditional financial and assessment practices often encourage overproduction and the creation of large safety inventories, while relying on external suppliers that focus on cost factors rather than total expenses. Introducing a lean manufacturing system necessitates a cultural transformation within the organization, and individuals who have been acknowledged and incentivized under the conventional system may be skeptical of lean methodologies and resist the change – this type of resistance is typical and can occur even within a company renowned for its effectiveness, including a company with the stature and reputation of Toyota. The authors highlight how readily executives can become convinced of lean's advantages and develop a keen interest in the methodology. The difference between success and failure hinges on whether leadership merely agrees and offers verbal support or demonstrates true commitment through the execution of concrete initiatives and actions.

The effectiveness of middle managers frequently plays a pivotal role in the company's success, and they are sometimes known as the "frozen middle."

Middle managers act as the essential link that bridges the gap between the company's leadership and the workers on the front lines. The responsibility of translating the organization's broad vision and strategic objectives, as set by the top executives, into concrete operational steps falls on middle management. Middle-tier managers in many companies frequently feel caught in a tug-of-war between competing goals. They are responsible for achieving results that are in line with traditional measures, yet at the same time, they must cultivate and encourage a culture that appreciates behaviors that are out of the ordinary, which the authors describe as facing pressure from various sides. They came to the understanding that they were at an impasse.

Cultivating exceptional leadership across the whole organization.

The authors describe Toyota's approach to selecting and developing leaders - a process that starts with identifying the best people to manage and then placing a high level of importance on the ability to mentor subordinates. Toyota is distinguished by a detailed organizational structure that spans from team leaders who are paid hourly on the factory floor to group leaders with salaries, each contributing to a production system renowned for its efficiency and effectiveness, unique to the company. The approach to selecting and assessing potential leaders is based on identifying individuals who possess the appropriate combination of knowledge, skills, and characteristics to thrive in the Toyota organization.

The active involvement of individuals is essential for the application of lean principles.

Toyota meticulously selects its team members, prioritizes their development and education, and inspires them to consistently participate in tasks that utilize their creative and problem-solving skills.

Begin the process by choosing the appropriate team members and integrate them into the company's culture with a thorough orientation program.

Toyota meticulously selects its employees, focusing on characteristics like motivation and teamwork that are essential for seamless assimilation into Toyota's corporate culture. The writers describe the comprehensive approach taken by Toyota at its establishment in Georgetown, Kentucky, which includes a rigorous examination of numerous candidates, followed by the selection of a limited group for additional evaluation and a smaller subset for interviews. The interviews utilize "behavioral event interviewing" to infer from candidates' past behaviors what their actions might be like in the context of Toyota's culture. The authors acknowledge that the thorough hiring process employed at Georgetown may not be practical for every company, but they suggest incorporating elements of this strategy, such as the behavioral event interview method, to better ascertain the most fitting applicants.

Upon selection, a new employee is carefully inducted through a two-tiered orientation process aimed at assimilating them into Toyota's distinctive cultural environment. For the first two weeks, the new employee does not enter the assigned work area. Toyota prioritizes comprehensive training for its workforce, ensuring they are well-versed in the organization's principles and standards, with special attention given to safety and preparing them for the physical demands of their roles. The team leader will closely mentor the new member within the team, utilizing techniques from Job Instruction Training to convey the exact skills necessary for the position. They additionally familiarize themselves with cooperative initiatives like Quality Circles. Integration into Toyota's culture can take a year or even more.

Introduce Job Instruction Training to foster exceptional abilities and create a strong foundation for continuous improvement and growth.

The principle of genchi genbutsu underscores the significance of personally witnessing the work process instead of depending exclusively on reports or descriptions, and it is also steadfastly integrated into the training of employees. Toyota's training methodology evolved from a system originally established for the United States' Training Within Industry program during World War II, which is recognized as Job Instruction Training. The authors provide a thorough analysis of the four-phase process inherent in the Job Instruction Training method.

1. The first stage entails deconstructing the task, detailing the necessary procedures, and setting key performance indicators for each to ensure that the implementation is precise and maintains high levels of both safety and product excellence.
2. Introduce the Operational Procedures. Make sure the demonstration space is prepared and set aside ample time for the operator's demonstration as well as the following practice.
3. Conduct trials to assess performance. Provide the trainee with an opportunity to carry out the demonstrated operation while being supervised.
4. Provide them with clear definitions of their responsibilities and the essential support they need.

Once a trainee has achieved a sufficient level of skill to operate independently, they should continue to carry out their responsibilities with ongoing assistance.

This method, while intricate and requiring significant effort to establish and carry out, includes many essential subtleties often overlooked in employee training, such as highlighting and exaggerating movements during the demonstration to make certain that the trainee understands the necessary steps to complete the task. The authors stress the importance of continuous education that extends past the early stages of the trainee's role, requiring regular observation, evaluation, and improvement. The authors warn that it is a common misconception to assume trainees will proactively seek help, noting that they frequently refrain from doing so out of concern that it might reflect poorly on their abilities.

Foster an environment where team members are motivated to collaboratively tackle challenges and where their suggestions are highly regarded as part of Toyota's system.

Liker and Meier point out that Toyota views its team associates as assets to be developed and nurtured, and provides them structured opportunities to participate in self-directed improvement activities such as Quality Circles and the Toyota Suggestion Program. The authors emphasize the necessity of viewing these actions as elements of an integrated strategy.

During the 1980s, many American companies adopted the practice of forming small groups dedicated to pinpointing and addressing problems within a framework of participatory management. The team's direction is typically established by a team leader who steers the group. The responsibility of the group leaders is to steer the team members towards the efficient use of their time. Toyota's method involves the formation of teams comprising adept members, capable leaders, and visionary group heads, which contrasts with the 1980s practices that often centered on minor tweaks aimed at user convenience.

Other Perspectives

• While committed leadership is vital, overemphasis on leadership can sometimes overshadow the importance of a collaborative and empowered workforce where ideas can come from any level.
• The success of a transformation may not only hinge on top management support but also on the adaptability and resilience of the entire organization to change.
• Cultural transformation is important, but it should be balanced with maintaining certain core values and traditions that have contributed to the organization's past success.
• Skepticism and resistance towards lean methodologies might not only be due to self-interest but could also stem from genuine concerns about the feasibility and applicability of lean principles in certain contexts.
• Middle managers are crucial, but their effectiveness can be hampered by a lack of clear communication and support from both top management and frontline employees.
• The idea of exceptional leadership across the organization is idealistic; in practice, it may be more effective to have a diversity of leadership styles that suit different teams and situations.
• Toyota's approach to selecting and developing leaders may not be universally applicable or the most effective in different cultural or organizational contexts.
• The active involvement of individuals is essential, but lean principles should also be flexible enough to accommodate individual creativity and alternative approaches to problem-solving.
• Meticulous selection of team members is important, but too rigid a selection process could potentially exclude talented individuals who do not fit a specific mold.
• A thorough orientation program is beneficial, but it should not be so extensive that it delays the contribution of new employees to the organization.
• Job Instruction Training is valuable, but it should be complemented with other forms of learning and development that cater to different learning styles and the evolving needs of the workforce.
• Motivating team members to collaborate is important, but it is also necessary to recognize and accommodate individual achievements and contributions to maintain personal motivation and job satisfaction.