PDF Summary:The Second World Wars, by Victor Davis Hanson

The Second World Wars by Victor Davis Hanson explores the myriad factors that shaped the catastrophic events and outcomes of World War II. The book details the evolution of military tactics and technologies—from the initial overestimation of strategic bombing to the eventual dominance of fighter escorts and effective targeting of enemy logistics.

It examines how the Allies' superior industrial might enabled them to outproduce the Axis forces. The book also delves into leadership approaches, Hitler's blunders, and the post-war impacts that reshaped global politics and human rights movements.

(continued)...

Hanson emphasizes the contrasting strategies of leadership among the Allies and the Axis, observing that the democratic nations ultimately showed more flexibility, even though they initially faced challenges due to the enemy's forceful strategies and their own slow responses during peacetime. The heads of the Allied forces enhanced their strategic stance through proactive engagement for advice, establishing strong international partnerships, and ensuring openness with governmental institutions and the press, thereby bolstering their capacity to amass essential human and material resources.

Hanson emphasizes the pivotal role Winston Churchill played in bolstering British resolve during their solitary struggle and his later endeavors in forming and directing the alliance of Allied powers. Churchill was instrumental in forging an alliance between the previously isolationist United States and the Soviet Union, demanding the Axis powers surrender unconditionally. Roosevelt's adept political maneuvering was crucial in garnering the backing of an American public that was initially apathetic towards participating in a global war and agreeing to sacrifices on an unprecedented industrial scale.

Stalin, despite initial setbacks and mistakenly trusting Hitler, eventually adapted to the demands of war by recognizing the significance of delegating power to his military commanders and prioritizing strategic objectives over ideological concerns. The vast territories of Siberia and the authoritarian nature of his government enabled the Soviet Union to withstand a conflict aimed at its complete destruction, a type of conflict that would likely have overwhelmed a more democratic state, while also supplying the essential industrial resources and personnel required to defeat the German army.

Hanson emphasizes the importance of democratic processes in auditing strategic decisions, ensuring greater public support, and enabling adaptability. Churchill and Roosevelt, in contrast to the Axis leaders, embraced a variety of viewpoints, acknowledged their mistakes, and prioritized openness to maintain public trust. During the conflict's most challenging times, the understanding of their leaders' decisions often maintained the morale of citizens from the United States and the United Kingdom, even though certain actions taken by the Americans or British were strategically unwise.

The economic, industrial, and technological factors played a pivotal role in the triumph of the Allied forces.

The manufacturing power ascribed to the coalition of Allied forces

The Allied forces secured a resounding triumph against the Axis by leveraging their superior industrial capacity, vast natural resources, and enhanced economic systems, which allowed them to outpace their opponents in generating material resources significantly.

Hanson emphasizes that the ultimate key to Allied victory resided in the vast industrial disparities between the opposing nations. The Axis nations were at a disadvantage because they were unable to harness their economic potential, optimally exploit their natural resources, or fully leverage their production and technological superiority in the same way the Allies succeeded in doing.

Hanson scrutinizes the economic strengths and weaknesses that characterized the countries allied with the Axis and those with the Allies prior to the outbreak of hostilities. Germany, renowned for its industrial capabilities, relied more on skilled labor and traditional craftsmanship than on large-scale production and was confronted with a substantial scarcity of vital resources, especially petroleum. Japan's aspiration to emulate the industrial expansion of Western countries led to considerable progress in shipbuilding and aviation; however, its dependence on imported materials and a constrained labor force ultimately limited its production capabilities throughout the conflict. Italy's significant but largely ineffective naval forces hindered the improvement of its military production capabilities and also obstructed those of Germany. The Allied powers held considerable advantages in terms of strategy. Emerging relatively unscathed from the Depression, the United States was poised to mobilize its immense industrial capabilities and substantial oil reserves for global conflict. Britain's extensive imperial dominion provided it with a wealth of resources and manpower, bolstering its capacity for production and distribution of goods. Despite facing early setbacks and losing access to its western industrial centers, the Soviet Union successfully relocated its production facilities to eastern regions where they were safe from German air attacks.

Hanson underscores the critical role played by the United States' industrial upswing, especially highlighting its unparalleled achievements in shipbuilding, aircraft production, and the construction of a wide array of military vehicles, including tanks. The sheer volume of tanks produced by the Allies made individual tank battles less critical, reducing the impact of the German tanks' advantage over American Shermans. Germany had the capacity to produce the Me-262, the first functional jet-powered aircraft, but it could not match the Allies' ability to mass-produce over three hundred thousand conventional fighter and bomber aircraft that were used to attack areas controlled by the Axis powers. The Allies' significant logistical assistance played a pivotal role in hindering enemy operations and ensuring a consistent flow of supplies to the front lines.

The immense scale, brutal intensity, and profound influence on human existence, as well as the resulting transformations in global political and intellectual terrains, distinguished the Second World War.

The staggering loss of life that occurred throughout the Second World War.

The vast number of deaths, encompassing soldiers and non-combatants alike, resulted from the conflict's extensive scope, the influence of authoritarian beliefs, and the employment of advanced weaponry.

Hanson argues that the carnage of the Second World Wars was unlike anything seen in human history. Advanced armaments, extreme ideological beliefs, and the extensive scope of the conflict contributed to a brutality that was inconceivable prior to 1939 – yet this reality did not deter the Allied forces from embracing comparable deadly technologies in their determination to overcome the coalition of countries led by Germany, Italy, and Japan, who had willingly attacked civilians and prisoners of war.

The development of aerial combat allowed warring parties to confront and disable adversaries more effectively and at ranges that were once unreachable. The intentional and horrific decimation of non-military populations was a consequence of the Axis powers' marked indifference to civilian casualties and the heightened lethality of combat. The initial strategy of using bombing from the air to halt military manufacturing gradually transformed into a means of instilling fear, ultimately leading to the obliteration of significant urban centers such as Tokyo, Dresden, and Hamburg, with each city experiencing the loss of life in the tens of thousands within a single night.

The systematic extermination of six million Jews by the Nazis is a chilling example of genocide. The Holocaust, which resulted in the systematic annihilation of six million Jews, exemplifies the terrifying capabilities of combining racial hatred, bureaucratic efficiency, and technological progress to forge a type of tyranny previously unseen, underscoring the darker elements of advancement in contemporary society.

Hanson underscores the profound impact of malnutrition and illness on civilians and detainees alike. Millions were displaced from their homes, forced into labor camps, or left to starve in occupied territories. The collapse of traditional agriculture, the disruption of supply lines, and the scorched-earth policies of both the Soviets and the Germans created conditions of famine and disease that claimed the lives of tens of millions beyond the battlefield.

The global situation following the conflict

The victory of the Allied forces achieved far more than the direct goal of defeating the Axis; it initiated complex geopolitical and ideological shifts that shaped the following period.

Hanson underscores the significance of the Allied victory, which put an end to the looming threat of authoritarian rule by the Axis powers and set the stage for an era marked by significant geopolitical shifts, ideological disputes, and the challenging process of rebuilding a world ravaged by conflict.

The disintegration of the Axis alliance led to a substantial shift in the global balance of power. Following their defeat, Germany and Japan were subjected to occupation, disarmament, and compelled to face the consequences of their actions during the war. While their economies eventually recovered and flourished, they surrendered their position as the preeminent military powers, as their wartime extremism was replaced by a reinvigorated commitment to democratic values.

Despite enduring tremendous casualties, the Soviet Union emerged from the conflict as a formidable military and ideological power, extending its influence and solidifying its control over the nations of Eastern Europe. The war led to a reduction in Britain's economic and military strength, subsequently diminishing its global influence and fueling anti-colonial sentiments. America ascended to a position of dominance, steering the course in a world newly split by the intensifying rivalry between democratic and communist beliefs.

After the war, the United States and the Soviet Union, previously allies against a shared enemy, saw their alliance disintegrate, leading to a Cold War marked by ideological conflict. The struggle, fought to safeguard democratic principles from authoritarian regimes, paradoxically empowered an autocratic nation, escalating global strains and initiating a fresh competition for military supremacy. The Holocaust serves as a lasting reminder of how delicate civil society is and underscores the critical importance of challenging hatred and extremist beliefs, rather than merely viewing it as a catastrophe resulting from conflict. The cessation of hostilities did not ensure a tranquil and secure global landscape; rather, the subsequent period was marked by a series of proxy wars, a surge in nuclear weaponry, and widespread breaches of human rights, all influenced to a degree by the strategic and tactical advancements that can be traced back to the Second World War.

Other Perspectives

• The effectiveness of strategic bombing is still debated among historians, with some arguing that while it did contribute to the Allied victory, its overall impact on the Axis war effort may not have been as decisive as often portrayed.
• The role of air superiority is crucial, but it was also the combined arms approach, including ground and naval forces, that contributed to the Allied victory.
• While advancements in aerial weaponry were significant, the war was not won by technology alone but also by the strategic and tactical application of these technologies.
• The assertion that the Allies overcame German tank superiority through superior industrial manufacturing could be nuanced by acknowledging that tactical and operational factors, as well as the strategic use of resources, also played critical roles.
• The importance of skilled personnel and logistical support in tank battles could be complemented by acknowledging the role of intelligence, reconnaissance, and communication in armored warfare.
• The impact of Hitler's leadership on Germany's military fortunes can be debated, with some historians suggesting that other factors, such as Allied economic and military resources, also played a significant role in Germany's defeat.
• While Allied leaders showed flexibility, there were instances of rigidity and mistakes in their decision-making processes that could have been detrimental if not for other compensating factors.
• The role of economic, industrial, and technological factors in the Allied victory could be counterbalanced by acknowledging the human element, including leadership, morale, and the will to resist and fight.
• The industrial capacity of the Allied forces was a significant factor, but the Axis powers also had periods of efficient production and innovation that could have had different outcomes under alternative circumstances.
• The loss of life in World War II was indeed staggering, but attributing it solely to authoritarian beliefs and advanced weaponry could be seen as an oversimplification that overlooks the complex causes of the conflict and the nature of total war.
• The geopolitical and ideological shifts post-war were influenced by the Allied victory, but they were also shaped by pre-existing tensions, emerging national interests, and the actions of other international players not directly involved in the conflict.