PDF Summary:The Real Crash, by Peter Schiff

In The Real Crash, Peter Schiff contends that the U.S. economy is on an unstable path due to government actions that distort market forces. He asserts the Federal Reserve's monetary policies have fueled harmful economic bubbles and excessive debt, while widespread government meddling through regulations, bailouts, and programs like Social Security have hampered true growth and eroded personal freedoms.

Schiff warns of an imminent economic crisis from this unsustainable trajectory, one that will upend the global order. But he offers solutions rooted in free markets, a gold-backed currency, lower taxes focused on spending, and ending entitlement overreach—arguing these shifts can restore prosperity through fiscal prudence and renewed entrepreneurship.

(continued)...

Schiff argues that the climate created by the Federal Reserve encourages reckless financial behavior. Peter Schiff reinforces his previous assertion that the risky behaviors of banks were instigated by the Federal Reserve through measures like reducing interest rates and increasing the accessibility of capital. In 2008, actions taken by the Federal Reserve aimed at preventing a total financial collapse ended up unintentionally worsening the problem. Peter Schiff emphasizes that the interventions by the Federal Reserve, including the bailouts of Bear Stearns and AIG as well as the implicit assurance to back the banking industry's liabilities, have laid the groundwork for future economic turmoil by fostering a climate in which financial institutions continue to make risky investments, relying on the prospect of government rescue.

Peter Schiff is of the opinion that it's crucial for the government to stop giving preferential treatment to specific industries or corporations in the marketplace. Legislative failure to encourage the acquisition of homes and the investment in renewable energy projects diminishes the probability that investors and financial institutions will partake in ventures with elevated risks, anticipating governmental fiscal backing. Should the government opt to shield institutions like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac from failure, the Federal Reserve would not be obligated to save them with financial support derived from the public's contributions.

Establishing a robust monetary framework backed by reserves of valuable metals.

Schiff argues that the only way to guarantee fiscal prudence among people and in the marketplace, as well as to put an end to the trend of financial rescues, is to return to a monetary system underpinned by gold. Politicians often gain popularity with constituents and finance unsustainable projects by leveraging their influence to generate capital out of thin air.

Limiting the government's power to arbitrarily generate currency, which diminishes its worth.

Peter Schiff believes that a transition to a monetary system grounded in gold could mitigate a variety of economic difficulties. A reinstatement of the gold standard would necessitate a halt in the expansion of the money supply by the Federal Reserve and curtail the government's spending capacity. By anchoring the currency's worth to a specific amount of gold, a monetary system is created where every dollar possesses intrinsic value due to its ability to be exchanged for a set quantity of this precious metal.

Schiff argues that the widespread assumption that the dollar's value will unavoidably decline is in fact a misunderstanding born from our dependence on a government-controlled fiat currency. Historically, the value of the dollar has generally risen. Schiff contends that politicians have created an illusion of economic growth, a condition that has continued to worsen from the time the Federal Reserve came into existence in 1913 and was further intensified when the nation abandoned the gold standard in 1971.

Schiff argues that such occurrences have set off a series of harmful effects across the entire economic framework. It impedes the capacity of regular employees to build up savings because it encourages expenditure rather than conservation of funds, thereby making their retirement planning more challenging unless they take on extra risks. Politicians frequently resort to generating fresh currency to support government projects and unviable social programs due to the fear of inflation.

Reinstating the influence of market dynamics in establishing the worth of currency.

Schiff argues that allowing the market to set the currency's value, rather than having it controlled by a central institution such as the Federal Reserve, would enforce essential limitations on both legislators and citizens. The persistent increase in the number of dollars in circulation, driven by the monetary strategies of the Federal Reserve, results in the devaluation of the currency, akin to the way in which the oversupply of a product generally causes its market price to fall.

Historically, the value of the dollar was directly tied to gold, which limited the Federal Reserve's capacity to increase the money supply only to times when it had sufficient gold reserves. The government possesses the ability to increase the quantity of money in circulation without the necessity of acquiring gold in today's economic framework. The capacity to generate more currency, either through the production of new bills or the digital entry of figures into a ledger, is held by the authorities.

Context

• Implicit guarantees protecting entities from failure typically involve the belief that certain institutions are "too big to fail," meaning that the government or other entities will step in to prevent their collapse to avoid broader economic repercussions. These guarantees can lead to moral hazard, where institutions take on excessive risks assuming they will be rescued if things go wrong. The perception of safety from failure can distort decision-making, encouraging riskier behavior than would occur in a purely market-driven environment. This dynamic can create systemic vulnerabilities and distort the normal risk-reward calculations in financial markets.
• The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is a U.S. government agency that provides deposit insurance to depositors in U.S. commercial banks and savings institutions. Abolishing the FDIC would mean eliminating this federal insurance protection for bank deposits, potentially leading to increased risks for depositors and affecting confidence in the banking system. Without the FDIC, depositors might face higher risks of losing their savings in the event of bank failures, as they would no longer have the same level of government-backed protection for their deposits. This proposal suggests that market forces and individual bank practices should govern the stability and operations of banks, rather than relying on a government-backed insurance program like the FDIC.
• Peter Schiff argues that tighter regulations and increased oversight should be shifted away from the financial sector. He believes that market-driven approaches to deposit insurance and allowing market forces to confirm the strength of banks autonomously are more effective than government intervention. Schiff advocates for reducing government interference and promoting a system where banks face the consequences of their actions without relying on bailouts or regulatory safety nets.
• Distortion of interest rates occurs when central banks manipulate rates, impacting borrowing costs and investment decisions. This can lead to misallocation of resources and create economic imbalances. Stopping this distortion is crucial for maintaining a healthy and efficient financial system. It helps ensure that interest rates accurately reflect market conditions and support sustainable economic growth.
• The harmful effects across the economic framework mentioned in the text primarily relate to the consequences of deviating from a gold standard monetary system. This departure can lead to issues such as currency devaluation, increased government spending, and challenges for individuals in saving and retirement planning. Additionally, it can create a reliance on generating new currency to support government projects and social programs, potentially leading to inflation concerns.
• The devaluation of a currency can occur when the supply of money in circulation increases faster than the demand for that currency, leading to a decrease in its value relative to other currencies or goods and services. The Federal Reserve's monetary strategies, such as increasing the money supply through actions like quantitative easing, can contribute to this devaluation by potentially causing inflation and eroding the purchasing power of the currency. This can impact various aspects of the economy, including prices, investments, and international trade. The relationship between monetary policy and currency value is a complex and crucial aspect of macroeconomics.
• The ability to increase the money supply without acquiring gold is due to the shift from the gold standard to a fiat currency system. In a fiat system, currency is not backed by a physical commodity like gold, allowing governments to create money by fiat, or decree. This flexibility enables central banks to adjust the money supply based on economic conditions and policy goals. The government's power to control the money supply in a fiat system is a key feature of modern monetary systems.

Revising the tax structure and modifying the range of programs designed to provide societal support.

Schiff argues that the unchecked growth of government power and size is the main factor causing instability in our economy. He suggests starting to decrease the size of the government by implementing a thorough overhaul of the taxation structure. He suggests a thorough revamping of taxation regulations to reduce the costs associated with compliance and to lessen the intrusive aspects of tax collection, all while pursuing a fiscal framework that remains neutral and does not influence the economic decisions of citizens. Peter Schiff believes that a transition to a tax system focused on consumption is essential, and he underscores the importance of either making substantial reforms to or completely discontinuing government entitlement programs that cannot be maintained.

Shifting to a framework that levies taxes on consumption rather than on earnings.

Schiff contends that eliminating the income tax, which he believes acts as a significant detriment, is crucial for the resurgence of a strong economy. He proposes shifting to a taxation framework that emphasizes consumption, potentially through the introduction of a nationwide sales tax.

Removing impediments and partialities in the current tax system that discourage employment, saving, and investing.

The writer forcefully argues for abolishing the income tax, emphasizing its detrimental effects on the willingness to work, save, and invest. The author contends that the fundamental flaw of the income tax system lies in its failure to acknowledge the worth of a person's work, encompassing the time and energy devoted to earning income, even though it permits deductions for various costs associated with that income generation.

Schiff argues that the so-called income tax is more accurately described as a tax on labor, emphasizing that since individuals do not create these earnings, they should not possess any revenue subject to income tax. Peter Schiff believes that taxing individuals based on their earnings rather than their actual profits is at odds with the fundamental intent behind the Sixteenth Amendment.

Additionally, he disapproves of the way the income tax system incentivizes businesses to expand through increasing their debt, as opposed to building up their savings, because interest on debt can be deducted for tax purposes, unlike income that could be invested after being saved. Additionally, he argues that many corporations essentially serve as conduits for revenue distribution to their employees, customers, and shareholders, instead of contributing directly to the government's coffers. Peter Schiff believes that the revenue generated by corporate income taxes ultimately diminishes the potential income and dividends for individuals or leads to elevated consumer prices due to increased expenses.

Ensuring adherence to tax regulations while maintaining the privacy of individual's personal data.

Schiff suggests abolishing the income tax to make adherence to tax regulations less complicated and reduce the related burdens. Peter Schiff likens the duty of remitting income tax to a mandatory revelation, similar to an "annual confession," in which Americans are compelled to disclose private details of their lives to the IRS.

Peter Schiff recommends eliminating the income tax and supports the establishment of a sales tax that would apply across the entire country. In this framework, individuals would still be taxed, but business owners would bear the majority of the burden for compliance costs, resulting in a substantial decrease in expenses related to adhering to tax regulations compared to the current system that is based on taxing earnings. Peter Schiff supports a fiscal structure that imposes taxes solely on income that is utilized for expenditures, leaving savings and investments free from tax obligations.

Overhauling or entirely discontinuing initiatives that lack financial sustainability.

Schiff argues that the persistent issue with the national debt is largely due to government programs such as Social Security and Medicare. Peter Schiff believes that the relentless growth of government programs, along with our consistent strategy of solving problems by escalating government involvement, and the Federal Reserve's ability to generate money out of thin air, have led us to a point where paying off our national debts has become an impossible task.

Acknowledging the financial instabilities associated with Social Security and Medicare, the focus is moving toward personalized options.

Schiff argues that the structure of Social Security resembles that of a Ponzi scheme, relying on the influx of new contributions to provide benefits to earlier enrollees. He believes that while the program was originally presented as social insurance or as a type of savings program, it was never truly sustainable, and the tax revenues from dedicatedpayroll taxes have been financing current benefits rather than any special trust fund.

He argues that Medicare is in even worse shape than Social Security-its costs are going to explode because of rising health care costs and the aging of the population. He emphasizes similar flaws in its framework, especially a system for modifying living expenses that depends on a metric often perceived to understate the true rate of inflation.

Halting the misuse of entitlements for political gain and reinstating the principle of personal accountability.

Schiff emphasizes the considerable influence wielded by the elderly, who are the main recipients of Social Security and Medicare, in protecting these programs, which in turn plays a role in their fiscal instability. He contends that rather than delivering the anticipated aid, such measures have detrimentally impacted both the economy and moral standards, diminishing savings and promoting dependency, ultimately disadvantaging the very people they aimed to support.

Peter Schiff champions the principle of individual responsibility in matters of social assistance and the building of pension funds. Peter Schiff believes it is crucial to begin the gradual discontinuation of these programs without delay, as addressing the problem while it is still controllable will avert the necessity for harsher and more harmful economic actions later on.

Other Perspectives

• Consumption taxes can be regressive, disproportionately affecting lower-income individuals who spend a larger portion of their income on necessities.
• Abolishing income tax could reduce the progressivity of the tax system, where higher earners contribute a larger share of their income.
• A shift to consumption taxes might not generate sufficient revenue to fund essential government services and investments.
• Removing income tax could lead to underinvestment in public goods like infrastructure, education, and healthcare, which rely on tax funding.
• Overhauling entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare could leave vulnerable populations without adequate support.
• Personalized options for Social Security and Medicare may not provide the same level of risk pooling and could result in higher costs for individuals.
• The assertion that the income tax system discourages employment, saving, and investing is debatable; many countries with high income taxes have strong economies and high savings rates.
• The idea that the current tax system incentivizes debt over savings is an oversimplification; other factors, such as market conditions and business models, also play significant roles.
• The comparison of Social Security to a Ponzi scheme is controversial and may overlook the redistributive and social welfare objectives of the program.
• The principle of personal accountability does not account for systemic issues that prevent individuals from saving enough for retirement or unforeseen medical expenses.
• The notion that entitlement programs are misused for political gain can be seen as a cynical view that does not consider the legitimate needs of beneficiaries.
• The claim that entitlement programs have led to a dependency culture is contentious and may ignore the complex socio-economic factors that contribute to the need for such programs.

The impending economic slump and strategies for navigating the difficult periods that loom ahead.

Peter Schiff is of the opinion that the measures implemented by the government and central bank to prevent a true economic slump have merely intensified the anticipated severity of the downturn. He argues that the U.S. dollar's stability is questionable and that there is a speculative excess in the U.S. government bond market. Investors, he says, have lost faith in the American economy and are clinging to U.S. dollars only because they don't currently have a better alternative. Schiff predicts a situation in which the United States must face its mounting debt as interest rates increase and inflation intensifies.

Understanding the inevitable severity of the forthcoming economic collapse.

Schiff argues that the United States is teetering on the edge of a fiscal catastrophe. The government cannot meet its financial responsibilities and uphold the promises it has made. Peter Schiff believes that the situation in the United States mirrors that of Greece, characterized by a government that has taken on excessive debt and overspent in order to provide significant benefits to its citizens.

The government's accumulation of financial obligations and debt is escalating at a pace that is unsustainable.

Schiff contends that the operations of the U.S. government are akin to a massive Ponzi scheme. Our capacity to meet our current financial obligations hinges on securing additional borrowing due to the continuous escalation of the national debt. He also underscores that the frequently cited national debt figure does not fully capture the breadth of the United States' financial responsibilities, which surpass the immediate debt and encompass anticipated costs for healthcare and retirement benefits for the elderly, as well as federal guarantees for educational loans. He emphasizes the many implicit responsibilities that fall under the purview of the federal government, encompassing potential bailouts for organizations such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Housing Administration, state-operated retirement programs, and significant banks like Bank of America.

The inability of the Federal Reserve and the government to prevent an imminent crisis.

The confidence of investors in the dollar allows the United States to persist in obtaining financing for its debt at exceptionally low rates of interest. He contends that a multitude of misleading practices constitute the foundational support for the value of the dollar. Foreign creditors, holding substantial reserves in U.S. currency and extending credit to the American government, view the Federal Reserve's ability to generate additional currency as a protective measure against the risk of non-payment. Schiff suggests that in reaction to inflation, the Federal Reserve will inevitably be compelled to raise interest rates, signaling the conclusion of its ability to sustain rates at unnaturally reduced levels.

When that occurs, not only will interest payments become unmanageable, but the U.S. Treasury will also have to find resources to pay back the face value of bonds and notes when they come due. Many of the recent investors in U.S. government debt have done so at low yields in order to hedge against a financial crisis. However, Schiff explains that as inflation intensifies, investors will rapidly abandon these bonds with minimal yields, much like individuals stricken by the plague would steer clear of lepers. The facade is ultimately unsustainable over an indefinite period. The United States is headed towards a situation where it will be unable to attract new lenders, leading to a substantial economic disturbance.

Positioning your economic resources and assets to ensure endurance and thrive.

Schiff concentrates on advising people to restructure their financial holdings in preparation for the anticipated economic decline. He recommends that investors adjust their portfolios to include assets that are likely to retain or enhance their worth as the dollar's value diminishes.

Investing in assets abroad, including valuable metals and various secure investments

Schiff advises individuals to diversify their savings into several stable foreign currencies and real assets, emphasizing the importance of purchasing actual gold.

In this transformed financial environment, traditional understanding is overturned, affecting not only bonds but also assets that can be easily liquidated. Schiff views investing in long-term U.S. Treasury bonds as risky because their worth could decline sharply with a rise in interest rates. Schiff suggests that choosing short-term bonds could be a wiser decision, but he cautions that inflation could erode the dollar's value, affecting the original investment's buying power. In his guidance on bond investments, he recommends selecting bonds with near-term maturities that are denominated in strong foreign currencies. He also recommends selecting bonds that offer the flexibility to convert into equity should inflation increase.

Schiff recommends that investors diversify their holdings by investing in international companies and industries that are likely to benefit from the weakening of the U.S. economy and the expansion of emerging market economies.

Expecting a considerable decrease in the dollar's value, which will probably result in a worldwide shift in living standards.

Peter Schiff maintains the perspective that the impending economic downturn will significantly alter the United States' position in the global economic order. The period during which we depended on Asia for our product supply and simultaneously offset this by selling U.S. government bonds is now over. The erosion in the dollar's purchasing power will compel a reevaluation of costs, leading to a reduction in American wealth.

It is crucial to identify the best strategy to leverage the upcoming economic downturn to maintain economic stability. Schiff is of the opinion that the looming crisis offers a distinct opportunity to acquire U.S. assets at lower costs and to benefit from a considerable alteration in global quality of life.

Other Perspectives

• Schiff's comparison of the U.S. to Greece may not account for the significant differences in economic size, global influence, and monetary policy tools available to the U.S.
• The idea that the U.S. government's financial operations resemble a Ponzi scheme is a strong analogy that may not fully acknowledge the complex and multifaceted nature of government finance and the ability of sovereign nations to manage debt.
• Schiff's prediction of an imminent crisis may not consider the resilience of the U.S. economy and its ability to recover from downturns, as evidenced by past economic cycles.
• The assertion that the Federal Reserve will inevitably raise interest rates in response to inflation may not account for the possibility of alternative monetary policy approaches or unforeseen economic conditions.
• The recommendation to invest in foreign assets and currencies assumes that these will be more stable than U.S. assets, which may not always be the case given global economic interdependence and the potential for volatility in any market.
• The suggestion that the U.S. dollar's devaluation will lead to a worldwide shift in living standards does not consider the potential for domestic innovation, productivity gains, or policy responses that could mitigate such effects.
• Schiff's advice to acquire U.S. assets at lower costs during an economic downturn may not recognize the risks involved in such a strategy, including the potential for further depreciation or prolonged recovery times.
• The view that the U.S.'s global economic position will significantly change may underestimate the adaptability of the U.S. economy and its historical role in leading global economic developments.
• The recommendation to diversify into gold and other precious metals does not consider the volatility and speculative nature of these markets, which can also lead to significant losses.
• The idea that investors will abandon U.S. bonds en masse may not take into account the depth of the U.S. Treasury market and the role of these securities as a global safe-haven asset during times of uncertainty.