PDF Summary:The Power of Crisis, by Ian Bremmer

In The Power of Crisis, author Ian Bremmer argues that humanity faces escalating global challenges such as pandemics, climate change, and technological disruption. These threats require international cooperation and collective action beyond the abilities of any single nation. However, Bremmer notes that the existing international institutions and cooperative frameworks are outdated and ineffective at addressing modern crises. He emphasizes the need to establish a new worldwide structure focused on shared responsibility and the fair distribution of duties.

Bremmer suggests that one of the key obstacles to achieving this global cooperation is the ideological divide between the United States and China. Their rivalry for dominance in various domains—from geopolitics to technological innovation—threatens to force other nations to take sides and fragment global efforts in tackling critical issues. Despite the challenges, Bremmer maintains that both powers have incentives to avoid outright conflict and sustain some level of pragmatic cooperation in the face of threats that endanger both nations and the world.

(continued)...

• The recovery fund prioritizes investments in green energy and digital transformation, aligning with the EU’s long-term goals of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 and enhancing digital infrastructure. This focus highlights a commitment to sustainable development as a core component of international cooperation.

The political and ideological divisions within the US that hinder effective global leadership

Bremmer emphasizes that the escalating global challenges are magnified due to deep-seated political divisions within American society. He demonstrates how the United States' inconsistent and fragmented approach to foreign policy, along with increasing skepticism regarding its dependability as a worldwide partner, results from severe political division and legislative deadlock, thereby reducing its stature as a dominant global force.

The escalating polarization and stalemate between political factions within the United States impede its ability to consistently provide dependable guidance in international affairs.

He explains how the increasing polarization and antagonism within American politics undermines the nation's capacity to tackle global challenges with a unified and resolute approach. The lack of consensus on crucial issues obstructs the development and implementation of foreign policies that remain stable and outlast the timeframes associated with electoral periods.

Political polarization on issues like climate change, international trade, and immigration regulations hampers America's ability to devise and uphold coherent foreign policy strategies.

Bremmer suggests that this divisiveness hampers U.S. leaders in maintaining their role in global agreements and in tackling major issues effectively. For instance, regarding climate change, the stance of the United States shifted from endorsing the global climate accord during the tenure of President Obama, to exiting the pact during President Trump's term, and then later pledging to rejoin it with the administration of President Biden.

The reliability of the United States in global affairs is compromised by its erratic policies on commerce and migration. Bremmer illustrates how other nations, like China, which employ more stable and enduring strategies in foreign affairs, are stepping in to fill the void created by the United States' withdrawal from its role as a global leader.

Practical Tips

• Start a climate conversation with friends and family using personal stories. Share how changes in the climate have affected you or your local area, such as unusual weather patterns or changes in local flora and fauna. This personalizes the issue, making it more relatable and potentially motivating others to take action.
• Engage in conversations with people from diverse backgrounds to understand the real-world effects of fluctuating commerce and migration policies. Create a small, informal discussion group with friends or colleagues where you can share stories and observations about how policy changes have affected your community or industry. This grassroots approach can offer a microcosm of the larger global effects these policies may have.
• Engage with international online forums and social media groups to understand the sentiments and opinions of people from different countries. This will give you a grassroots-level insight into how the global community perceives shifts in leadership and power dynamics. Look for groups on platforms like Reddit or Facebook that focus on international relations or global news discussions.

The decline in political cohesion and trust in American institutions undermines the nation's reliability and stature as an international partner.

Bremmer argues that both allies and opponents can clearly see the significant unrest in the United States' political scene. Nations like Japan, South Korea, India, and Australia are experiencing a decline in their trust in the steadfast promises of the United States as it grapples with deep-seated political conflicts.

The diminishing trust in the United States undermines its ability to create and maintain partnerships, coordinate joint actions, and cultivate a consensus in the face of growing global threats. The persistent division along political lines within the United States hampers the country's ability to lead global efforts in addressing the most critical challenges that humanity faces.

Practical Tips

• Enhance trust in local institutions by volunteering for citizen oversight committees or local boards. This hands-on approach allows you to understand the inner workings of institutions and share your experiences with your peers, demystifying the processes and decisions made by these bodies. As a volunteer, you can contribute to transparency and accountability, which are key to rebuilding trust.
• Encourage consensus in your workplace by creating a 'solutions box'. Invite colleagues to anonymously submit ideas for improving the workplace. This can lead to a culture of collaboration and shared decision-making, reflecting the process of cultivating consensus on a larger scale.
• Start a 'Common Ground Book Club' with friends or neighbors, selecting books that explore themes affecting everyone regardless of political affiliation, such as community building or personal growth. Discussing these themes can highlight shared values and concerns, which is a step towards bridging political divides.

The widening disparity in wealth, coupled with a reduced sense of economic security among many Americans, fuels discontent with the current state and reluctance to engage in international collaborations.

Bremmer suggests that the growing gap in wealth and opportunities within the United States is a major factor leading to the erosion of its position as a global leader and the dysfunction of its political institutions. The growing gap in wealth and the turmoil within traditional sectors of work are fueling a backlash against the establishment, which in turn bolsters resistance to global interconnectedness and joint global initiatives.

The disruption in traditional job markets and livelihoods due to automation and globalization has led to a marked rise in bitterness and a pronounced backlash against those in power and the established order.

The author describes how the amalgamation of outsourcing, automation, and diverse economic shifts associated with globalization has eroded job security for numerous people, fostering an environment of economic instability that has fueled resentment and driven a surge of resistance against globalization and international cooperation. Voters facing financial difficulties tend to favor leaders who offer straightforward answers to intricate issues and cast blame on "elites," frequently blaming internal challenges on outside factors and showing a preference for more insular policies.

Practical Tips

• Enhance your digital literacy by dedicating time each week to learn a new software or tool online. Platforms like YouTube offer free tutorials on a wide range of digital tools. By becoming more proficient with technology, you can make yourself more adaptable to the changing job landscape that automation and globalization are creating.
• Create a 'Backlash Brainstorm' group with peers where you meet monthly to discuss frustrations with the status quo and brainstorm peaceful, creative responses. This could range from writing letters to representatives, supporting local initiatives, or simply spreading awareness through social media. The goal is to transform feelings of helplessness into proactive community engagement.
• Create a personal financial safety net by automating your savings. Set up a high-yield savings account and arrange for a portion of your paycheck to be directly deposited into this account. This way, you're building a reserve fund without having to actively think about it each month. Over time, this fund can grow and provide a cushion in case of job loss or other financial emergencies.
• Create a personal blog or vlog series documenting the use of international products in your daily life. Highlight how these products benefit you and contribute to a globalized economy, thereby showcasing the positive aspects of international cooperation on a personal level.
• Develop a habit of engaging in discussions with people who have different viewpoints. By actively seeking out conversations with individuals who hold different political or economic perspectives, you expose yourself to a broader range of ideas and rationales. This can help you form a more nuanced understanding of the challenges that leaders propose to solve.
• Keep a "blame journal" to track moments when you find yourself attributing failures or challenges to external factors. Each time you catch yourself blaming something outside of your control, jot it down. After a week, review your entries and identify patterns. This can help you recognize when you're externalizing internal challenges and encourage you to look inward for solutions.
• Create a personal shopping guideline that prioritizes products made or grown within your country. This can be as simple as a checklist that helps you identify and select local goods when you're at the store. For instance, if you're buying fruits, choose those labeled as locally sourced over imported ones.

Initiatives aimed at reducing inequality by strengthening social safeguards and allocating funds for workforce retraining face political resistance.

Efforts to mitigate the negative impacts of globalization and technological evolution, including the strengthening of safeguards for vulnerable populations and the allocation of resources to retrain workers, encounter significant opposition in a politically divided America. Bremmer posits that conflicts among political groups over the extent of governmental intervention, the efficacy of strategies designed to redistribute wealth, and the essential role of international collaboration hinder efforts to diminish disparities and establish a robust and lasting worldwide framework. He argues that these divisions hinder the government's ability to address core issues, which in turn exacerbates economic volatility and perpetuates a continuous cycle of conflict and acrimony.

Context

• Cultural attitudes towards individualism versus collectivism can influence political resistance, with some cultures emphasizing personal responsibility and others advocating for collective support systems.
• Political and social divisions can lead to ongoing disputes and a lack of consensus on policy solutions, hindering effective governance and exacerbating societal tensions.
• Politicians may resist strengthening safeguards if they believe their constituents view such measures as unnecessary or as a misuse of taxpayer money.
• Implementing large-scale retraining programs can be hampered by bureaucratic inefficiencies, leading to delays and increased costs, which can fuel opposition.
• Powerful interest groups and lobbyists can influence political agendas, often prioritizing corporate or elite interests over policies that might reduce inequality.
• Other countries may have different approaches to government intervention, providing alternative models that can influence domestic debates and policy decisions.
• Resistance to wealth redistribution often stems from concerns about government overreach, the potential for decreased economic incentives, and fears of inefficiency or corruption in implementing redistribution policies.
• Nations may resist international collaboration due to concerns about losing sovereignty or control over domestic policies, especially when it involves binding agreements or regulations.
• Politicians may focus on short-term gains to win elections rather than long-term solutions, which can lead to neglect of systemic issues like inequality and economic instability.
• Inconsistent or outdated regulations can hinder economic growth by creating uncertainty for businesses and investors, which can lead to market fluctuations.
• Technological advancements can displace workers and create new economic divides, necessitating proactive policies to manage transitions and prevent societal rifts.

The intensifying rivalry between the United States and China hampers efforts to work together internationally.

Bremmer posits that the escalating tensions between the United States and China could pose the greatest risk to the sustainability of a collaborative global framework. He describes the journey toward inevitable conflict between the two countries as one fueled by a pursuit of global supremacy, divergent ideologies, and deep mistrust of each other's intentions.

The United States is vying with China in a contest that spans control over geopolitics, economic supremacy, and innovation in technology.

Bremmer sheds light on the rapid deterioration of the partnership that the United States and China once shared, leading to an era characterized by rivalry and distinct confrontation. China is actively expanding its global influence through the enhancement of its military capabilities, the growth of its economy, and its ambition to lead in technological innovation.

The escalating competition in areas such as Taiwan and the pursuit of technological dominance increases the risk of a direct confrontation between the countries.

He pinpoints several pivotal moments that have the potential to escalate into a direct confrontation involving the United States and China, particularly over Taiwan—a region China is determined to incorporate—and in the South China Sea, where there has been a significant increase in Chinese military activity. Bremmer underscores the intensifying rivalry for technological dominance, particularly in fields like machine learning and sophisticated telecommunications networks, which stand as the primary catalysts for altering the global balance of power and could lead to the emergence of separate, incompatible technological realms.

Practical Tips

• Engage in consumer advocacy by researching and supporting tech companies that promote ethical practices and international cooperation. Use social media to share information about these companies and explain why supporting them can contribute to a more stable global environment. By doing so, you become part of a consumer base that values corporate responsibility in the context of international relations.
• Start a discussion group with friends or online to explore hypothetical scenarios involving US-China relations. Each member could present a different viewpoint or policy option regarding the situation in Taiwan and the South China Sea. This activity encourages you to think critically about the potential consequences of various actions and to appreciate the diversity of perspectives on international issues.
• Enhance your cultural empathy by engaging with Taiwanese and Chinese culture through literature, film, and cuisine. This can help you appreciate the distinct identities and values at play, which are often overshadowed by political discourse. Start by reading a novel by a Taiwanese author and then one by a Chinese author, watching films from both cultures, or cooking traditional dishes from each region.
• Engage in citizen diplomacy by participating in cultural exchange programs online, such as language learning partnerships with individuals from the involved regions. Understanding the culture and language of a country can provide insights into its geopolitical strategies and motivations. This grassroots approach to diplomacy can foster greater empathy and awareness of the human elements behind military actions.
• Develop a habit of using and experimenting with new technologies to get a hands-on understanding of their potential. For instance, try out different machine learning-powered apps or devices, and use telecommunications services that boast the latest advancements. This personal experience will help you appreciate the practical implications of technological rivalry.
• Start learning a new language that's prominent in a technologically advancing region. This could enhance your ability to understand and engage with emerging tech markets and cultures. For instance, if you notice a surge in tech developments in Brazil, picking up Portuguese could give you a head start in grasping new opportunities or understanding shifts in the tech landscape.

The expanding ideological, political, and fundamental value disparities are making it increasingly difficult for the United States and China to reach a consensus on worldwide matters affecting both countries.

Bremmer emphasizes that the profound ideological and political differences that exist between the nations pose a substantial obstacle to joint endeavors. He emphasizes that China's internal authoritarian actions, the extensive infringement of human rights, and the progressively severe limitations on both information and dissent are significant causes of contention. Despite sharing goals like managing disease proliferation and tackling ecological issues, the contrasting perspectives of the US and China on individual freedoms, expression rights, and the level of state involvement remain obstacles to fostering collective trust or consensus on global matters.

Context

• Deep-rooted cultural differences influence diplomatic interactions and public perceptions, affecting how policies and actions are interpreted by each country.
• The Chinese government enforces strict internet censorship, often referred to as the "Great Firewall," which blocks access to many foreign websites and censors online content within the country.
• The US supports a market-driven economy with minimal state intervention, believing that economic freedom leads to innovation and prosperity. China employs a state-capitalist model, where the government plays a significant role in directing economic activity and development, which it argues is necessary for rapid modernization and growth.
• The US frequently criticizes China for its human rights record, including issues in Xinjiang and Hong Kong. These concerns are a major point of contention and affect diplomatic relations.

Heightened friction between the United States and China could substantially undermine the prospects for joint international efforts on critical issues.

Bremmer suggests that should the rivalry persist unbridled between China and the United States, it could result in a deeply fragmented global environment, which would greatly obstruct joint efforts to tackle universal challenges. Ian Bremmer warns that this rivalry could jeopardize the prosperity and financial equilibrium of the countries involved as well as the international community.

If the United States and China were to engage in a contemporary version of a "cold war," it would force other nations to choose sides, resulting in the fragmentation of global institutions and significantly obstructing the collaborative action required to address global issues.

The writer explains that an emerging standoff reminiscent of the Cold War between the United States and China has the potential to unsettle the existing international order, forcing other nations to choose sides between these two dominant states. This might result in a reduced capacity for global institutions to function effectively, hinder the joint actions needed to tackle threats that cross borders, and increase instability across the globe. Ian Bremmer warns that the splintering of digital technologies and the internet might give rise to separate, incompatible ecosystems, potentially exacerbating current divisions and obstructing collaborative efforts.

Context

• The US and China are both heavily involved in cyber capabilities. A cold war scenario could lead to increased cyber conflicts, with countries choosing sides based on cybersecurity alliances and information warfare strategies.
• The development of incompatible technological standards and systems could hinder international cooperation in areas like cybersecurity, data sharing, and innovation.
• Collaborative international efforts are key to maintaining peace and security. Divisions could lead to increased military tensions and conflicts, making it more difficult to negotiate peace agreements and manage arms control.
• A standoff could disrupt global trade networks, as countries might face pressure to align economically with either the U.S. or China, potentially leading to trade barriers and reduced economic cooperation.
• Separate digital ecosystems could lead to increased costs for businesses that need to operate across different systems, potentially stifling innovation and economic growth.
• Users may face limitations in accessing certain technologies or services depending on their location, leading to unequal access to information and digital tools.
• Fragmentation can disrupt global supply chains and trade, which are crucial for the distribution of essential goods and services during crises, such as medical supplies during a pandemic.
• Heightened tensions might exacerbate cultural and ideological divides, leading to increased nationalism and xenophobia, which could further destabilize societies.

Both countries share a substantial common goal to avert the intensification of hostilities and maintain a degree of functional cooperation, despite the fact that overcoming the growing chasm of suspicion between them will be extremely difficult.

Bremmer argues that despite deep-seated mistrust and intense rivalry, both the United States and China have significant incentives to avoid outright conflict and to sustain a relationship grounded in pragmatic concerns. He underscores the deep economic interdependence, highlighted by commerce, mutual investments, and linked supply chains, as crucial factors that encourage a more cautious approach to disputes involving the two global powerhouses, the United States and China.

Ultimately, Bremmer suggests that it is essential for the United States alongside China to establish a collaborative relationship that harmonizes their competitive nature with cooperative efforts regarding pivotal global challenges that threaten both nations and the entire world, while continuing to compete in other areas.

Other Perspectives

• The notion of a common goal to avert intensification of hostilities assumes that both parties have equal interest in de-escalation, which may not account for strategic calculations where one side might see an advantage in increased tension.
• The difficulty in overcoming suspicion might be mitigated by the changing internal political landscapes in either country, which could lead to new policies that foster trust.
• The cautious approach to disputes might not be solely due to economic interdependence but could also be influenced by other factors such as diplomatic efforts, international law, or the desire to maintain a stable global order.
• Economic interdependence does not always prevent conflict; historical precedents show that nations deeply intertwined economically can still engage in hostilities when national interests or ideologies clash significantly.
• While collaboration is ideal, the differing political ideologies and strategic objectives of the United States and China may inherently limit the depth and effectiveness of cooperative efforts.