PDF Summary:The One Page Business Strategy, by Marc Van Eck and Ellen Leenhouts

Too many organizations struggle with executing strategies due to lack of focus, unclear goals, and poor communication. The One Page Business Strategy by Marc Van Eck and Ellen Leenhouts presents an effective framework called OGSM for developing comprehensive yet concise business strategies.

Drawing from the Management by Objectives approach, OGSM stands for Objective, Goals, Strategies, and Measures—a streamlined process for translating broad ambitions into specific, quantifiable targets aligned across an organization. Managers will learn how to cascade strategic priorities vertically and horizontally while constantly monitoring progress and making adjustments.

(continued)...

• Establishing a strong brand identity is important, but it should not be so rigid that it prevents the company from evolving and responding to new trends and market demands.
• A thorough analysis of the organization's capabilities and risks is critical, but it can also lead to paralysis by analysis if not conducted efficiently.
• Considering perspectives from different team members in the SWOT analysis is beneficial, but it can also lead to conflicting viewpoints and a lack of consensus, which may delay decision-making.
• The SWOT analysis is useful, but it may not capture all the nuances of the business environment, and relying solely on it could lead to strategic blind spots.
• Having four fundamental elements of the OGSM framework is a structured approach, but it may also be overly simplistic for complex organizations with multiple lines of business or global operations.
• Clearly defining and coordinating each component of the OGSM framework is important, but too much rigidity in this process can stifle creativity and the ability to respond quickly to unforeseen challenges.

The fundamental elements that constitute an OGSM.

Set an objective that is both ambitious and achievable, ensuring a harmonious blend of challenge and attainability.

The goal acts as the central source of inspiration and fervor for the entire OGSM framework.

The primary component of your concise strategic blueprint is signified by the 'O' in OGSM, which stands for 'Objective'. Leenhouts emphasize the significance of a carefully crafted objective that sheds light on the entire OGSM framework, providing every member of the organization with a clear target and direction. This broad objective describes the aspirations your organization intends to realize within a designated period. For numerous entities, the timeframe in question could span twelve months or possibly extend to thirty-six.

Marc Van Eck, in collaboration with Leenhouts, identifies a number of critical components necessary for establishing a robust Objective. The objective should be sufficiently demanding to inspire motivation, yet attainable enough to be within the bounds of feasibility. They recommend setting lofty goals because such targets foster innovative thought and may result in unforeseen advancements. A well-crafted Objective should be in harmony with your organization's mission while also resonating with both the rational and emotional ambitions of your team members. The strategy must be articulated in a manner that is transparent and straightforward, ensuring that each person within the company can understand and articulate its core principles in their own way.

The objective should be clearly stated in a statement that clarifies both the desired outcome and the approach to accomplish it.

Van Eck and Leenhouts suggest bolstering your objective by concentrating on the identification of the desired outcomes and the methods for achieving them. The statement outlining your approach, or 'How', delineates the method you intend to use to achieve your objective, which in turn clarifies the desired outcome. This method ensures that your objective is both understandable and executable.

Goals: Quantifiable targets that represent the intended outcome.

Goals must conform to the SMART framework, ensuring they are precise, quantifiable, consensual, outcome-oriented, and constrained by deadlines.

In the OGSM framework, 'G' represents specific, quantifiable achievements that convert the broad objective into concrete outcomes. Leenhouts emphasize the necessity of reaching distinct, quantifiable benchmarks during the journey to accomplish goals. They offer concrete milestones that enable you to measure your advancement and ascertain if your trajectory aligns with your goals.

The book emphasizes the significance of setting objectives that are explicit, measurable, consensual, outcome-oriented, and time-constrained, collectively referred to as SMART Goals. A particular objective makes clear the outcomes to be realized, determines who will benefit, and delineates the limitations present. A Measurable goal is quantifiable, allowing you to track your progress objectively. A suitable goal maintains equilibrium between aspiration and attainability, presenting a challenge that motivates while remaining feasible to avert demotivation. A goal centered on outcomes is intrinsically associated with the Objective. Lastly, a Timely goal has a clearly defined timeframe, providing a sense of urgency and accountability.

The desired outcomes and the strategies to achieve them establish the objectives.

Leenhouts emphasize the necessity of establishing objectives structured around the OGSM framework, encompassing the desired results and the strategies for their attainment.

To establish yourself as the leading innovator in your field through the development of a culture that encourages trial and error and learning from failures, you should measure your progress in innovation with indicators such as the number of patent applications filed, and evaluate the effectiveness of cultivating an experimental mindset by, for example, monitoring participation rates in innovation-focused workshops.

Decisions regarding the allocation of resources are made to fulfill the predetermined objective.

Ensure that no more than five strategies are put into action to preserve clarity and effectiveness.

Once you have determined your Objective and Goals, the subsequent phase involves mapping out the routes that will guide you to your intended results. These routes are your Strategies, denoted by the 'S' in OGSM. Marc Van Eck and Ellen Leenhouts emphasize that strategies ought to be viewed as deliberate choices about how to distribute resources like staff, time, and money to achieve objectives, rather than merely a collection of advantageous concepts.

Leenhouts stress the significance of brevity when crafting your business strategy. They argue that focusing on a few, no more than five, powerful strategies and executing them flawlessly is far more advantageous than spreading efforts across numerous initiatives.

A successful strategy necessitates precise definition.

Leenhouts detail five key attributes that are crucial for defining and refining your Strategies with clarity, represented by the acronym 'S': Specific, Selective, Sustainable, Synchronized, and Sufficient.

A specific strategy clearly outlines the desired result and the selected method. A Selective strategy means making tough choices about what you won’t pursue, ensuring focus on the most impactful actions. A sustainable strategy aligns with your enduring goals and leverages your core strengths. A cohesive strategy aligns with your other plans and avoids any internal conflict. Finally, a Sufficient strategy, when executed well, can drive you to accomplish your primary goal.

A detailed blueprint for executing the strategy is complemented by a Dashboard designed to track the progress of strategic initiatives.

The Dashboard provides quantifiable metrics to monitor the advancement of the strategy.

The 'M' in the OGSM model represents 'Measures,' which constitute the critical components of both the Dashboard and the Action Plan. Leenhouts emphasize the importance of transforming strategic blueprints into actionable steps and setting measurable outcomes. This approach ensures that your strategic plan is converted into tangible progress.

The Dashboard serves as the central instrument for tracking your strategic journey's advancement, providing a visual representation of your progress toward each strategic objective. The method goes beyond a simple checklist, incorporating quantifiable metrics that track the implementation of strategic measures and gauge their success in realizing the desired outcomes.

The Action Plan details specific steps for each strategy, establishes clear timelines, and identifies the individuals accountable for carrying out each task.

Your strategy's 'Measures' component is made actionable through the development of a blueprint that transforms abstract strategic ideas into concrete, actionable tasks. Leenhouts stress the importance of having well-defined roles and comprehensive components within the Action Plan. Responsibilities should be clearly assigned to designated individuals for accountability, with a focus on defining tasks and methods to guarantee precision in their roles. Furthermore, every task must have a specific completion date established, creating a schedule for implementation and promoting a culture of responsibility.

Other Perspectives

• Setting an objective that is both ambitious and achievable may sometimes lead to conservative goal-setting to ensure attainability, potentially limiting innovation and high-reaching achievements.
• Clearly stated objectives are important, but over-simplification can risk omitting the complexity and adaptability required in dynamic business environments.
• While SMART goals are widely recommended, they may not always be the best approach for every situation, especially in fields where innovation and creativity are more important than measurable outcomes.
• The recommendation to limit strategies to five may be overly prescriptive and not suitable for all organizations, particularly larger ones with the capacity to pursue more initiatives effectively.
• The emphasis on quantifiable metrics in the Dashboard might lead to the undervaluing of qualitative outcomes that are harder to measure but equally important.
• The Action Plan's focus on specific steps and clear timelines may not always allow for the flexibility needed to respond to unforeseen challenges or opportunities.

Implementing the OGSM framework across the whole organization.

The process of ensuring that the goals of teams and departments are in sync with the broader organizational OGSM is referred to as vertical integration.

Various departments and groups incorporate the organization's primary objectives into their comprehensive strategic blueprint.

The approach termed cascading involves breaking down the comprehensive organizational OGSM framework into distinct, executable plans that are customized for different staff echelons, encompassing departments and teams. Marc van Eck and Ellen Leenhouts highlight that there are primarily two forms of cascading: one that occurs vertically and another that spreads horizontally. Every aspect of the organizational framework and its necessities is carefully considered to ensure that each component works in harmony towards shared success.

Ensuring that a particular team or department's objectives are in harmony with the broader goals set forth in the company's OGSM is referred to as aligning objectives across the organizational levels. The company's overarching strategy is eventually distilled into distinct objectives tailored to every individual department. Implementing this approach is highly advantageous for functionally structured organizations, as it allows various teams to pool their unique skills in pursuit of a wider strategic goal. For example, if "improving customer satisfaction" is a key strategic target for the company, the customer service department may adopt this as their primary goal, making certain that their goals and subsequent actions are in harmony with this purpose.

Departmental/team goals are derived from the organizational Dashboard metrics

The authors advise that departmental or team objectives should be set in alignment with the relevant metrics from the company's Dashboard that are associated with their selected objectives. The firm could assess the efficiency of its customer service staff by establishing goals aimed at decreasing the duration required to address inquiries or enhancing the scores from client feedback, both key factors in the broader index of customer satisfaction.

Every department and team contributes to the reinforcement of the overarching OGSM by implementing a strategy that ensures cohesive integration at various levels.

Departments/teams are assigned specific 'How' elements of the organizational Objective and Strategies

In contrast to a compartmentalized approach, various teams and departments collaborate on a range of organizational strategies. Every department contributes to the fulfillment of the collective goals outlined in the OGSM plan, irrespective of their immediate connection to a specific strategy.

Teams customize the execution specifics related to the company's goals and plans to align with their distinct functions, guaranteeing that their efforts are consistent with the overarching goals of the company. The approach fosters collaboration by synchronizing the activities of different departments, ensuring their unique functions work together towards the collective achievement.

Departmental/team OGSMs align with and support the organizational OGSM

Leenhouts stress the necessity of ensuring that the aims and strategies of various teams and departments are in harmony with the company's primary objectives, thereby guaranteeing that all OGSM frameworks are intimately linked to the organization's central goals. All teams, regardless of their unique functions, collaborate seamlessly to achieve a common goal, ensuring that their combined actions advance the broader strategic intent.

Other Perspectives

• Vertical integration can create rigidity, making it difficult for departments to adapt to changes or innovate due to strict adherence to the overarching OGSM.
• Cascading objectives may lead to a dilution of goals as they are broken down into smaller parts, potentially resulting in a loss of focus on the original strategic intent.
• The process of aligning departmental goals with organizational metrics might lead to an overemphasis on measurable outcomes at the expense of qualitative goals such as employee well-being or innovation.
• Functionally structured organizations may find the OGSM framework too constraining if it does not allow for cross-functional collaboration that can lead to more innovative solutions.
• The assumption that all departments can contribute equally to the overarching OGSM may not hold true in practice, as some departments may have more indirect roles that are harder to align with central objectives.
• Assigning specific 'How' elements to departments might lead to siloed thinking, where departments focus on their contributions without considering the bigger picture or the interdependencies between different parts of the organization.
• The need for every department to align with the organizational OGSM could stifle creativity and discourage departments from pursuing novel approaches that could ultimately benefit the organization.
• The focus on alignment and integration may inadvertently lead to a one-size-fits-all approach, which may not be suitable for all departments or teams with unique challenges and contexts.
• The emphasis on cohesive integration at various levels might overlook the value of healthy conflict and debate within organizations, which can be essential for challenging assumptions and fostering critical thinking.

Continuously evaluating and monitoring progress in relation to the goals set within the OGSM structure.

Regular reevaluation and updating of the OGSM is crucial to maintain its relevance and to keep propelling advancement.

Regular gatherings are held each month to address upcoming obstacles or implement required adjustments in the company's strategy.

Leenhouts emphasize that a meticulously developed OGSM should be regarded as a dynamic entity, requiring ongoing scrutiny, evaluation, and adjustments. Continuously refining your approach ensures that your OGSM remains pertinent, evolves with changes in the market, and serves as an effective instrument in driving your company toward its envisioned future.

To maintain momentum and address challenges, Leenhouts and Van Eck recommend holding focused, brief meetings every month to evaluate the progression of the OGSM. The discussions should concentrate on pinpointing and tackling any barriers that impede the implementation of the Action Plan. In these gatherings, a conducive environment is nurtured, enabling strategists to exchange progress reports, identify possible obstacles, and jointly devise solutions.

Every quarter, progress is assessed in relation to the set goals and performance indicators.

Leenhouts recommends improving the effectiveness of the monthly gatherings focused on the Action Plan by including detailed evaluations every three months. During these half-day sessions, participants can thoroughly assess how the progress aligns with the goals that are indicated on the Dashboard. During these assessments, strategy proprietors deliver an in-depth examination that illuminates both the quantitative and the nuanced aspects of their strategy's efficacy.

Meetings are held yearly to update the OGSM, taking into account fresh perspectives and changes in the surroundings.

Leenhouts recommend dedicating three distinct half-day sessions every year for a comprehensive review and update of the entire OGSM strategy. At these annual meetings, attendees reflect on the past year's successes and challenges, incorporating these insights into the upcoming iteration of their strategic plan for the business. The OGSM remains a dynamic document, annually revised to stay in step with the evolving needs of the organization and market conditions.

To successfully execute a strategic framework, steadfast dedication, substantial content, and a solid plan are imperative.

Ensure that the company's operational activities fully incorporate the OGSM framework and prioritize the recognition of accomplishments.

Marc Van Eck and Ellen Leenhouts introduce a powerful and concise acronym, SCT, which stands for the essential elements required to effectively put into practice and sustain OGSM. The trio of fundamental components that significantly enhance the capacity of OGSM to drive organizational change and achieve strategic goals consists of Assistance, Substance, and Methodology.

The authors stress the significance of fostering a corporate environment that fully embraces and supports the principles of the OGSM framework. The organizational structure should fully integrate the principles and practices of OGSM, making them a core component of the workflow instead of viewing them as a supplementary effort. To secure support for OGSM goals, integrating these targets into the evaluation of employee performance and the incentive structure is vital, as is maintaining transparent and frequent updates on OGSM progress, and importantly, recognizing accomplishments regardless of their scale. Recognizing accomplishments bolsters team morale and reinforces the legitimacy of the strategy that includes goals, various tactics, and assessment measures, thus fostering ongoing commitment.

Content: Establishing OGSM as the foremost tool utilized in the development of strategic plans, while allowing for adjustments.

The second crucial aspect of Strategic Creative Thinking emphasizes the importance of consistency and clarity when implementing OGSM across the organization. Leenhouts advise adopting a solitary, coherent structure to preserve the efficiency of OGSM and to prevent ambiguity during the strategic planning process. They recommend embracing OGSM as the primary, and ideally, the sole method for guiding strategic progression.

Leenhouts underscores the importance of maintaining adaptability in strategic planning to accommodate changing situations. However, they advise maintaining consistency in the primary aims and targets, as frequent alterations can diminish confidence and compromise the sense of reliability. They advise modifying your approach and methods to surmount challenges and seize fresh opportunities, all the while ensuring unwavering congruence with the primary objective.

Technique: Guaranteeing uniform comprehension and implementation of the OGSM framework.

The final aspect of SCT underscores the importance of unwavering commitment throughout the whole organization to the OGSM framework. When the OGSM framework is embraced across different levels of an organization, there's a possibility that various sectors may apply elements of the model inconsistently, leading to confusion and a breakdown in uniformity.

To tackle this challenge, Leenhouts and her colleague recommend that every employee, regardless of their tenure or level of experience, undergo uniform training to develop a shared understanding of the OGSM framework and its significance to their specific roles. To preserve its effectiveness in achieving organizational objectives, it is crucial to keep OGSM at the forefront of the group's collective awareness through a steadfast focus on core principles and ongoing communication.

Other Perspectives

• Regular evaluation and updating of OGSM may lead to excessive focus on process over action, potentially causing delays in decision-making and implementation.
• Monthly meetings, if not managed efficiently, could become time-consuming and may not always result in actionable outcomes.
• Quarterly assessments might not capture the full picture of progress, as some goals may require a longer timeframe to accurately measure results.
• Annual meetings for comprehensive review may not be frequent enough to pivot quickly in fast-changing industries.
• The SCT framework, while comprehensive, may not account for all the nuances of a particular organization's culture or operational realities.
• Fully incorporating the OGSM framework into company activities might be challenging in larger, more complex organizations where different departments have varied objectives and processes.
• Prioritizing the OGSM as the primary strategic planning tool could potentially limit the exploration of alternative frameworks that might be more suitable for certain business contexts or challenges.
• Emphasizing consistency and clarity in the implementation of OGSM across the organization might stifle creativity and flexibility in departments that thrive on innovation and adaptability.
• Uniform comprehension and implementation of the OGSM framework may not be practical in diverse organizations where different roles and functions may require tailored approaches to strategic planning.