PDF Summary:The Moscow Rules, by Antonio Mendez and Jonna Mendez

In the Cold War espionage game between the CIA and KGB, the high stakes confrontation in Moscow was a constant chess match. The CIA developed innovative strategies, known as the "Moscow Rules," to outsmart the KGB's intense surveillance while operating in the Soviet capital.

By Antonio Mendez and Jonna Mendez, The Moscow Rules details the CIA's methods for concealing communications and equipment, gathering intelligence through sources like Penkovsky and Tolkachev, and evading betrayals from within. The authors offer an inside look at clandestine operations against a formidable adversary, the obstacles the CIA overcame, and their continuous refinement of tactics in Moscow.

(continued)...

The CIA honed the art of illusion and identity transformation, thereby amplifying the challenges Soviet spies faced when attempting to discern the truth.

The Office of Technical Services (OTS) worked alongside illusionists to create and refine advanced techniques for intelligence gathering. Mendez and Mendez delve into the cooperative efforts by detailing the methods used to enable face-to-face engagements.

OTS spearheaded the creation of distinctive methods for concealment, incorporating attire and masks that allowed CIA operatives to alter their appearance and blend in with the public undetected. Initially, agents were trained in the basics of concealing their identities, which involved using fake beards and hairpieces, and as the need for increased confidentiality in their missions grew, they advanced to using very realistic masks. Mendez provides detailed insights into the careful techniques used by the workshops specializing in disguise, which included exact measurements of head circumferences, acquisition of hair samples, and noting down clothing sizes to craft individualized disguises for every operative. Mendez shares a humorous story about the unique disguise he designed for Ron, who was employed in a technical capacity. He donned a pair of cowboy boots and complemented them with brightly colored orange pants, a safari-style tan jacket, and a light-hued cowboy hat. The purpose of using these disguises was to modify the appearance of agents so they could evade detection by the vigilant surveillance of the KGB.

Practical Tips

• Practice the art of misdirection in everyday conversations to become a better communicator. Introduce a topic or story that leads listeners in one direction, then pivot to your actual point or question. This technique can be useful in negotiations, storytelling, or simply to maintain control of the conversation flow, mirroring the strategic use of illusion.
• Develop your ability to read body language by playing a "silent conversation" game with friends. Without speaking, try to communicate a complex message to each other using only gestures and facial expressions. This will help you become more attuned to non-verbal cues, which can be invaluable in understanding unspoken intentions or feelings, much like an intelligence officer would need to do.
• Create a game with friends where you each develop a simple alter ego for a day out, complete with a new hairstyle, fashion choices, and backstory. This can be a fun way to explore identity and the concept of perception in a social setting. After the experience, share insights on what it felt like to adopt a different persona and how others responded to you.
• Develop a creative writing habit where you craft short stories based on characters with distinct disguises and identities. Focus on how these disguises affect the character's interactions and the plot. This can enhance your understanding of narrative development and character creation.
• Develop a habit of observing and adjusting your body language and attire to blend into different environments. When you're in a business setting, dress accordingly and adopt a professional demeanor; in a casual setting, relax your posture and dress down. This practice can help you become more aware of how you're perceived and allow you to adapt seamlessly to various social contexts.

The Central Intelligence Agency utilized clandestine techniques including concealed item exchanges, surreptitious hand-offs, and limited-distance communication tools for their missions in Moscow.

CIA agents operating within Soviet territory significantly enhanced their security by embracing methods of communication that eliminated the need for direct personal interaction. In Moscow, setting up secret meetings required a carefully devised plan for engagement that guaranteed a clear separation in time and location between the spy and their informant. Mendez and Mendez illustrate the strategic approach by detailing how Jack Downing successfully resumed communication with Soviet asset Aleksandr Ogorodnik, known by the code name TRIGON, following his arrival back in Moscow.

The communication strategy was devised to guide the asset on signaling their preparedness to collect a delivery, acknowledging receipt of the item, and setting up procedures for in-person discussions with a CIA representative. The techniques for transmitting messages encompassed strategies such as deliberately calling wrong numbers, pinpointing exact spots for signaling during movement, and positioning unique markers at places like bus stops or adjusting a window's arrangement. To protect their agent, the CIA sent an officer ahead of time to verify the security of the location for the exchange and to ensure that there was no KGB monitoring. The authors emphasize that a common technique for concealing such items was to disguise them within a milk carton that had been crumpled and smeared with a substance designed to discourage others from touching it. Ogorodnik ingeniously hid his materials inside milk containers by employing a method that utilized a mustard plaster.

Context

• During this period, technology was not as advanced as it is today, so agents relied heavily on physical methods of communication and concealment, which required creativity and precision.
• Protecting local informants was a priority, as they faced severe penalties if caught. Indirect communication minimized their exposure and risk.
• Ensuring separation in time and location was a key aspect of operational security, which involves protecting sensitive information from adversaries by minimizing predictable patterns and reducing the risk of interception.
• Resuming communication with an asset like TRIGON involved overcoming numerous logistical and security challenges, including the risk of interception and the need for absolute secrecy to protect both the asset and the operation.
• Limited-distance communication tools, such as short-range radios or coded messages, were often employed to maintain secrecy and reduce the risk of interception by Soviet authorities.
• This technique involved using pre-arranged phone numbers that, when dialed, would not connect to a real person but instead serve as a signal. The act of calling these numbers at specific times could indicate readiness or the need for a meeting without direct verbal communication.
• The advance officer's role was to scout the location ahead of time, looking for signs of KGB presence such as suspicious vehicles, individuals loitering, or unusual activity that might indicate surveillance.
• The use of a deterrent substance also played a psychological role, exploiting human aversion to unpleasant materials to enhance the security of the hidden items.
• Milk cartons were common household items in the Soviet Union, making them an ideal choice for concealment as they would not arouse suspicion if seen by others.

The CIA's operations, agents, and intelligence-gathering efforts in Moscow, including key figures like Penkovsky, TRIGON, Tolkachev, and Olson

The United States gained critical intelligence insights through the effective handling and coordination of key Soviet sources in Moscow, including Penkovsky, TRIGON, and Tolkachev.

Mendez and Mendez highlight the importance of human intelligence work in the Cold War era by discussing three key operations: Penkovsky, another associated with the agent known as TRIGON, and the operation involving the CKTAW wiretap. In the early phases of the Cold War, Colonel Oleg Penkovsky, who was part of the Soviet military intelligence, became an essential informant. His profound grasp of the nuclear capabilities possessed by the Soviet Union played a crucial role in enabling the United States to effectively challenge Premier Nikita Khrushchev during the tense Cuban Missile Crisis.

Aleksandr Ogorodnik, an important Soviet informant for the CIA who went by the codename TRIGON, was handled in accordance with the guidelines referred to as the "Moscow Rules". During his time at the Soviet embassy in Bogota, he risked his safety to photograph a multitude of secret documents and then safely returned to Moscow.

The CKTAW operation was a clandestine endeavor that intercepted a messaging channel utilized by the USSR's Ministry of Defence to relay information to a nuclear test site situated in the outskirts of Moscow. Jim Olson, an operative with specialized training, utilized disguise techniques to gain entry to one of the various manholes aligned in sequence. The book emphasizes the enhancement of the CIA's espionage techniques, which involved the use of cutting-edge technology, inventive strategies, and a variety of tactical deceptions during these three operations.

The operatives undertook perilous missions, using clever and carefully crafted techniques to securely communicate classified information to the CIA, ensuring they evaded detection by Soviet monitoring.

Adolf G. Tolkachev, operating under the alias CKSPHERE, adeptly circumvented a multitude of security protocols at his job to keep his clandestine activities concealed. Tolkachev, an employee at NIIR, was instrumental in producing vital information from a principal establishment engaged in creating Soviet military radars.

During his lunch break, he cautiously extracted sensitive materials from the NIIR, ensuring he remained unnoticed by Soviet monitoring. The CIA equipped him with specialized gear, such as a device to ensure image clarity, in addition to a Pentax camera. The Central Intelligence Agency crafted a counterfeit version of his official institute ID to bypass the library's lending procedures at the institute. He was aware that the choices he made carried significant dangers. In a conversation with his CIA liaison, he asked for a lethal pill to employ in case he needed to end his own life. The authors highlight that individuals like Tolkachev, labeled as "volunteers," frequently assumed the most perilous assignments for the CIA, motivated by a deep sense of duty or a powerful repulsion toward the governing system of the USSR.

Practical Tips

• Engage in community discussions or online forums focused on historical espionage and military technology. By contributing to these conversations, you can learn from enthusiasts and experts, which can sharpen your understanding of the significance of intelligence in global security, akin to the role Tolkachev played with his information.
• Turn your lunchtime into a brainstorming session for personal projects. If you have a side project or hobby, dedicate your lunch breaks to jotting down ideas or planning next steps. Keep a dedicated notebook or digital app for this purpose, and treat these sessions as sacred time to focus on your personal goals, similar to how Tolkachev dedicated his breaks to his mission.
• Enhance your personal security by learning basic self-defense techniques. Enroll in a self-defense class or watch instructional videos online to learn how to protect yourself in various situations. This not only improves your physical ability to defend yourself but also boosts your confidence and awareness in potentially dangerous situations.
• Engage in role-playing scenarios with friends to understand the decision-making process under pressure. Take turns presenting each other with ethical dilemmas or high-stakes situations and discuss the choices you would make. This can help you understand your own thresholds for risk and the motivations behind your actions.

Downing and Guilsher, who oversaw these agents, adeptly navigated Moscow's perilous operational landscape by employing the adaptable strategies known as the Moscow Rules.

The narrative illustrates the dangers faced by the CIA's most skilled agents in Moscow, focusing on Martha Peterson's joint efforts with Aleksandr Ogorodnik, who was secretly referred to as TRIGON. Peterson earned the distinction of being the first woman to serve as a case officer in Moscow, utilizing a guise that effectively concealed her actual identity from the KGB.

The individuals responsible for these assets encountered risks comparable to those faced by the operatives. Peterson spent months preparing for a meeting where he would provide Ogorodnik with cameras and other vital equipment necessary for intelligence operations. The technique required thorough processes to ascertain the presence of any surveillance by employing Surveillance Detection Routes and setting up hidden storage using everyday items. The authors emphasize that these gatherings, frequently convened during nocturnal hours amidst park settings, entailed considerable physical and psychological strain. Peterson carefully documented her thoughts on Ogorodnik, highlighting the solitude and strain he must have felt while he was providing the CIA with sensitive data.

Practical Tips

• Improve your understanding of human behavior by observing people in a variety of settings and taking notes on their interactions. Spend an afternoon in a public place like a park or a mall and discreetly observe how people communicate non-verbally, how they form groups, and how they react to unexpected situations. This can give you insights into group dynamics and individual behavior patterns.
• Develop a habit of creating contingency plans for your daily activities. Before attending an event or a meeting, think through different scenarios that could occur and plan your responses. For example, if you're going to a job interview, plan what you would do if public transport is delayed, or if there's a last-minute change in the interview panel. This prepares you to navigate unexpected situations smoothly.
• Enhance your situational awareness by practicing the 'OODA loop' (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) in everyday scenarios. Start by observing your surroundings and the behavior of people around you, orient yourself by understanding the context, make a decision based on your observations, and then take action. For example, when you're in a crowded place, use the OODA loop to navigate through the crowd efficiently, identifying potential hazards or quickest routes.
• Develop your code-making abilities by creating simple ciphers for everyday use. For instance, you could devise a system for encrypting your grocery list or a daily to-do list. This exercise not only makes mundane tasks more engaging but also hones your ability to think in patterns and codes, which is a fundamental skill in espionage.
• Write a blog or social media posts highlighting lesser-known female pioneers, focusing on their strategies and accomplishments. Sharing these stories can educate and motivate others, while also honing your research and storytelling skills.
• You can enhance your privacy online by creating an alias for social media and forum participation. Instead of using your real name, choose a pseudonym that doesn't link back to your personal information. This can protect your identity from being easily traced and maintain your privacy in online discussions.
• Develop a system for evaluating and selecting the right tools for every professional interaction by considering the goals of the meeting and the preferences of the participants. If you're preparing for a collaborative session, you might choose a digital whiteboard app that allows real-time collaboration, or if it's a more formal presentation, you might opt for high-quality visual aids or interactive slides. For instance, if you're meeting with a visual learner, you could prepare infographics or charts that make complex data more digestible.
• Develop a habit of performing a physical sweep of meeting spaces for unfamiliar objects that could be hidden microphones or cameras. Before starting a meeting, take a few moments to check common hiding spots like plants, light fixtures, and under tables. This proactive approach doesn't require technical expertise but can be effective in detecting low-tech surveillance methods.
• Experiment with timing variations when leaving or arriving at locations that are part of your routine. Leave for the gym 10 minutes earlier one day and 20 minutes later the next. This unpredictability can disrupt patterns that would be noticeable to someone monitoring your activities.
• Create a faux book box by hollowing out an old book or stacking several to form a hidden compartment on a bookshelf. This method not only recycles old books but also serves as an inconspicuous storage option for small valuables, blending in with the rest of your book collection.
• Improve your team's cohesion by scheduling regular evening walks in nature-based settings. This can lead to better communication and a stronger sense of unity among team members. Instead of a formal meeting room, the informal setting can encourage open dialogue and a more relaxed atmosphere. Try ending the walk with a group reflection session where everyone can share their thoughts and feelings about the walk and the discussions that took place.
• Develop a psychological resilience toolkit to handle stress better. Start by identifying activities that calm your mind, such as deep breathing, listening to music, or practicing mindfulness. Create a list of these activities and commit to engaging in at least one of them during or after stressful situations to help manage psychological strain.
• Develop your analytical thinking by playing strategy games that require you to deduce an opponent's intentions. Choose games like chess, where you must anticipate your opponent's moves, or mystery board games where you deduce the 'culprit' based on clues. This practice can sharpen your ability to infer intentions from observed actions, similar to analyzing a person's behavior.
• Develop a habit of evaluating the trustworthiness of information sources by creating a checklist of credibility indicators. Whenever you come across new information, especially if it's sensitive or significant, run it through your checklist. Look for factors such as the source's expertise, transparency, and history of accuracy to help you decide whether the information is reliable.
• Create a personal "solitude strategy" by scheduling regular periods of alone time that are dedicated to self-reflection or a hobby that you enjoy. This can transform solitude from a negative experience into a positive, rejuvenating one. You might choose to spend this time gardening, reading, or practicing meditation, turning solitude into a productive and fulfilling part of your routine.

The CIA's operations in Moscow faced significant challenges following betrayals that resulted in the apprehension and subsequent loss of key informants.

The passing of Adolf Tolkachev resonated profoundly with every operative involved in the mission. The book revealed the inherent dangers of conducting intelligence operations within enemy regions, despite taking utmost precautions. Mendez and Mendez pinpoint the downturn to a particular event on June 13, 1985, involving Paul Stombaugh, who was ensnared in a trap orchestrated by the Soviet security agency.

Stombaugh had been tasked with delivering a package of fresh equipment to Tolkachev but was apprehended at the meeting site after KGB officers leaped from the shadows. The authors suggest that the ease with which Stombaugh was detained and then vanished at the hands of Soviet intelligence indicated a compromise in the operation's security. Edward Lee Howard, after being expelled from the CIA for dishonest conduct and failing polygraph tests, sought revenge by disclosing the true name of Tolkachev to Soviet intelligence. The CIA came to understand that Howard was not the only person responsible for the betrayal of American agents. Aldrich Ames, a counterintelligence officer burdened by substantial financial debts, had been disclosing the identities of agents to the Soviets since 1985. The betrayal significantly disrupted operations at the Moscow facility, causing a multi-year delay in their efforts.

Context

• Edward Lee Howard was a former CIA officer who defected to the Soviet Union. His betrayal was particularly damaging because he had been trained in espionage techniques and had access to sensitive information.
• The loss of Tolkachev not only represented a significant intelligence setback but also had a profound emotional impact on the operatives who had worked closely with him, highlighting the personal connections and sacrifices involved in espionage work.
• Operatives often had to blend into foreign cultures and speak the local language fluently, which required extensive training and posed additional risks if they failed to convincingly assimilate.
• In espionage, operatives use various methods to avoid detection, such as dead drops, brush passes, and the use of disguises. Despite these precautions, the risk of exposure is high, especially in heavily monitored areas like Moscow during the Cold War.
• After his defection, Howard lived in the Soviet Union and later Russia, where he was given asylum. He remained there until his death in 2002, living under the protection of the Russian government.
• Ames was motivated by financial difficulties, including debts and a lifestyle beyond his means. He began selling secrets to the Soviet Union in exchange for money, which eventually amounted to over $2 million.
• Ames' actions led to the exposure and execution of several CIA assets in the Soviet Union, severely crippling the agency's human intelligence capabilities in the region.

The CIA faced a multitude of internal obstacles and difficulties during their continuous intellectual struggle with the intelligence agency of Moscow.

The continuous rivalry with its Soviet counterpart perpetually propelled the advancement of novel strategies and defensive measures.

The CIA faced considerable pressure to preserve its edge as the KGB extensively utilized methods of surveillance, penetration, and deception.

To counter the CIA's increasingly sophisticated methods of deception and stealth, the Soviet security agency intensified its countermeasures against American intelligence operations in Moscow. The authors detail the tactical maneuvers that took place within Moscow's streets between the two intelligence agencies.

The Soviet security apparatus used a method that involved a luminescent powder which, when dusted on objects, enabled them to track an individual's movements. Distribute the powder across different surfaces, including the handles of car doors, footwear, and clothing. The technique offered a simple and effective way to keep track of foreign individuals suspected of espionage. The agency known as the CIA encountered resistance when its female operatives, referred to as swallows, employed seduction to entrap lone American diplomats and military personnel. A KGB operative, known by the alias of a swallow, became involved with Clayton Lonetree, who was serving as a US Marine at the United States Embassy in the Russian capital.

Context

• Both agencies engaged in psychological operations to undermine each other's morale and effectiveness, adding another layer of complexity to their intelligence activities.
• Known as "maskirovka," these operations involved creating false narratives or planting misleading information to confuse or mislead foreign intelligence agencies.
• The case of Clayton Lonetree, a US Marine who was seduced by a KGB swallow, is a well-documented example of successful Soviet counterintelligence operations during this period.
• This method was particularly useful in urban environments like Moscow, where direct surveillance could be more easily detected.
• The use of such powders required the CIA to develop counter-surveillance techniques to detect and remove the powder, highlighting the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between the two agencies.
• The use of seduction in espionage, often referred to as a "honey trap," is a long-standing method where agents form intimate relationships to gain access to sensitive information or to compromise the target.
• The use of swallows involved psychological manipulation, exploiting emotional and personal vulnerabilities to extract information or coerce individuals into cooperation.

Internal challenges, such as the skepticism sown by counterintelligence chief Angleton and the shift from human intelligence under Turner's leadership, further compromised the CIA's operations in Moscow.

The atmosphere of pervasive distrust within the agency itself considerably impeded the CIA's efforts to gather intelligence on the Soviets. During the 1950s and 1960s, the effectiveness of the division in charge of counterintelligence, under the leadership of James Angleton, significantly deteriorated in all areas of human intelligence. Angleton's steadfast conviction that the KGB had deeply infiltrated the agency, a notion commonly dubbed the Monster Plot, led to a near-total halt of operations in Moscow.

Upon appointing Stansfield Turner as the new CIA director, President Jimmy Carter witnessed a redirection of the agency's priorities, moving them away from operations centered on human intelligence in the wake of numerous scandals and investigations into its conduct throughout the 1970s. Turner's emphasis on technical platforms, which he deemed more dependable, backfired as his order to cease all CIA agent activities in the Russian capital resulted in the compromise of two critical informants, including one who eventually provided the United States with a list of Soviet spies determined to steal American secrets. The authors argue that these internal disputes eroded the agency's ability to collectively confront the opposition.

Context

• Stansfield Turner was a former admiral in the U.S. Navy before becoming the CIA Director. His military background influenced his preference for structured, technology-driven intelligence methods over traditional espionage.
• James Angleton was a highly influential figure in the CIA, known for his intense focus on counterintelligence. His belief in widespread Soviet infiltration led to a culture of paranoia, which often resulted in the sidelining of valuable intelligence operations and personnel.
• The pervasive distrust fostered by Angleton's theories not only halted operations but also damaged morale and led to the dismissal or sidelining of many experienced officers who were suspected, often without evidence, of being compromised.
• President Carter's administration aimed to promote human rights and transparency, influencing his support for reforms in intelligence practices to align with these values.
• The focus on technology over human intelligence may have led to a strategic misalignment, where the CIA's capabilities did not fully match the complex and evolving nature of Cold War espionage challenges.
• The decision to cease operations might have also been influenced by internal power struggles and differing philosophies within the CIA about the best methods to gather intelligence, reflecting broader debates about the future direction of the agency.
• Turner's emphasis on technology over human intelligence was controversial. While technical methods can provide valuable data, they often lack the nuanced insights that human sources can offer, particularly in understanding intentions and motivations.

The CIA's operations in Moscow faced considerable challenges due to failed missions linked to Penkovsky and Tolkachev, along with the betrayal by agents like Ames and Howard.

After successfully executing missions like TRIGON and CKTAW, Moscow Station later faced several instances of betrayal in the subsequent years. The authors describe a sequence of occurrences that resulted in a trail littered with sensitive and top-secret papers. The apprehension and subsequent execution of Oleg Penkovsky in 1963 severely weakened the Agency, leading to a profound distrust of Soviet informants. The notion, first put forth by James Angleton, that Penkovsky could have been secretly working on behalf of the KGB persisted within the Agency for a considerable time, leading some CIA operatives to approach with skepticism the trustworthiness of those proposing help from the Soviet Union.

In 1985, a series of events led to the KGB's capture and subsequent execution of multiple agents, many of whom were compromised due to the betrayal by CIA officer Aldrich Ames or former CIA trainee Edward Lee Howard, in what later was referred to as "the Year of the Spy." The situation deteriorated due to the disruption of several vital electronic transmissions. It was revealed that the KGB had previously acquired the blueprints for the new embassy structure and had embedded surveillance equipment in the concrete prior to its delivery to the building site, thereby breaching the US Embassy's security. Mendez underscores that while Soviet intelligence was a formidable adversary, the most severe obstacles encountered by CIA officers supporting the Agency's operations in Moscow were the traitors within the CIA, viewed by Soviet intelligence as their most prized assets.

Context

• Oleg Penkovsky was a high-ranking Soviet military intelligence officer who provided the West with crucial information during the Cold War, including details about Soviet missile capabilities. His intelligence was instrumental during the Cuban Missile Crisis, helping the US understand the Soviet Union's strategic capabilities.
• The breaches caused by these betrayals forced the CIA to overhaul its operational security measures, including communication protocols and asset handling procedures, to prevent further compromises.
• James Angleton was the CIA's chief of counterintelligence and was known for his intense paranoia about Soviet infiltration, which led to widespread suspicion and internal investigations within the CIA.
• The suspicion that Penkovsky might have been a double agent contributed to a broader atmosphere of distrust, affecting the CIA's ability to recruit and trust Soviet informants.
• The term "Year of the Spy" refers to 1985, a period marked by numerous espionage scandals and betrayals within U.S. intelligence agencies, highlighting vulnerabilities in counterintelligence practices.
• The use of covert surveillance in embassies has historical precedents, such as the discovery of the Great Seal bug in the US Embassy in Moscow in 1952, which was a sophisticated listening device hidden in a wooden plaque.
• The KGB had several high-profile successes against Western intelligence, which bolstered their reputation as a formidable adversary. These successes often involved the recruitment of moles within Western agencies.
• Traitors within an intelligence agency can cause severe damage by revealing operational methods, identities of agents, and strategic plans, which can lead to the loss of human lives and compromise national security.