PDF Summary:The Last Viking, by Don Hollway

In The Last Viking, Don Hollway chronicles the rise of Harald Hardrada, a legendary figure who embodied both the martial prowess and strategic cunning of the Viking culture. The book details Hardrada's evolution from a young warrior serving under his brother's command to an adept military leader in the Byzantine Empire. It explores his struggles to gain power in Norway and establish dominance over Denmark through calculated alliances and relentless campaigns.

Hollway portrays Hardrada's shrewd political maneuvering, his adaptability to different battlefronts, and his growing ambition that ultimately led to a fateful clash with English forces in 1066. The narrative culminates in Hardrada's death at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, marking an end to the Viking Age and cementing his legacy as its final great warrior.

(continued)...

Michael V's doubtfulness prompted an attempt to overpower the esteemed troops of Byzantium, causing Harald to withdraw his support and protect Zoe.

Hollway recounts how Michael V endeavored to replace the traditionally loyal Varangian Guard with a fresh group of defenders, which included the castrated Scythians. To evaluate their allegiance, he engineered a clash with Harald and his troops, resulting in the Varangians withdrawing from their duties within the confines of the emperor's residence. The Varangian Guard rallied their forces with the already widespread rebellion as a consequence of Zoe's captivity. The author implies that these behaviors demonstrate the limitations of royal power and the enduring influence of the Varangian Guard on Byzantine political matters.

Context

• The introduction of castrated Scythians as a new guard force was likely an attempt by Michael V to create a loyal faction within the military, as eunuchs were often used in Byzantine politics due to their inability to establish dynasties.

Other Perspectives

• The decision to replace the Varangian Guard might not have been solely Michael V's initiative; it could have been influenced by other members of the court or necessitated by political pressures.
• The incident could have been escalated by misunderstandings or provocations from either side, rather than a clear-cut engineered clash by Michael V.
• The text does not provide evidence of the Varangian Guard's motivations, so it is possible that their joining the rebellion was coincidental to Zoe's captivity and not directly caused by it.

The populace's uprising leading to Zoe's restoration to power highlighted the significant role that the citizens played in shaping the political dynamics of the Byzantine Empire.

The author skillfully highlights the rebellion against Michael V, focusing on the demands of Constantinople's populace for just treatment of the banished Empress Zoe. The narrative describes the chaos and the forced flight of the emperor when the city succumbed to looting, leading to an attack on the ruler's residence. Zoe's reassumption of power highlighted the significant role of public opinion in Byzantine political strategies and confirmed the crucial role of the Varangians in influencing the imperial succession. The Varangian Guard's endorsement, along with widespread public support, was crucial in restoring Zoe to her authoritative role, thereby contesting the reigning emperor's position.

Practical Tips

• Start a book club focused on historical or political narratives to understand the dynamics of uprisings and leadership changes. Through discussions with club members, you'll gain diverse perspectives on what drives people to unite for a cause. Choose books that cover different periods and cultures to see the universal themes and unique circumstances that lead to power shifts.
• Engage with online platforms that crowdsource policy ideas and community projects. Platforms like these allow you to submit proposals and support others' initiatives, effectively participating in a modern digital polis. Your contributions could shape the priorities and actions of local leaders, akin to the collective influence of citizens in past societies.
• Explore historical fiction writing by crafting a short story based on the theme of seeking justice for a marginalized figure. Use the concept of advocating for fair treatment as the central plot, drawing parallels to contemporary issues. This can deepen your understanding of the theme and its relevance today.
• Encourage fair representation in local governance by volunteering to be an observer at town hall meetings or council sessions, ensuring that all community members, especially those who are marginalized or less heard, have their interests fairly represented and their voices heard.
• Reflect on past experiences where you felt out of control and identify the triggers. By recognizing the situations that have previously led to feelings of chaos, you can start to develop personal strategies to maintain composure and make clear-headed decisions during future stressful events. For example, if you notice that tight deadlines cause you stress, you might start breaking tasks into smaller, manageable parts well in advance.
• Support local businesses by setting up a community fund that can be used to aid recovery after incidents of looting. Contributing to such a fund, or even starting one, provides a financial safety net for affected businesses, helping them to bounce back and maintain the economic stability of your area.
• Build a network with your neighbors to keep an eye on each other's properties. Create a neighborhood watch group or a simple communication chain, such as a group chat, to report suspicious activity and help each other maintain a secure environment.
• Enhance your decision-making skills by practicing with small, everyday choices. Make a habit of quickly assessing pros and cons and then confidently making a choice. For instance, when deciding what to eat for dinner, weigh your options based on health, convenience, and taste, then decide without second-guessing. This practice can build your confidence in making larger decisions.
• Analyze the effectiveness of different communication methods in shaping opinion by conducting informal surveys within your social circle. Choose a current issue and create a set of different narratives around it, each with a distinct angle or emphasis. Share these narratives with friends or family members in conversation, through social media, or via email, and then ask for their opinions on the issue. Observe which narratives are most persuasive and consider how this reflects the strategic use of public opinion in historical contexts.
• Analyze a recent political election in your country by identifying the key players and their influence on the outcome. Look beyond the candidates and examine the role of advisors, media, and financial backers. Write a brief report on your findings, highlighting parallels with historical influences on leadership, such as those exerted by the Varangians. This exercise will help you understand the modern equivalents of such influences and their effects on leadership succession.
• Develop a strategy for leveraging social proof in your personal and professional life. Social proof, akin to the Varangian Guard's endorsement, can significantly influence others' perceptions. Share your achievements and endorsements on social media, in professional networks, and during meetings to subtly boost your reputation and increase your chances of gaining support for your endeavors.
• Start a small-scale awareness campaign in your neighborhood using door hangers. Design a simple, eye-catching door hanger with a clear message about the cause you're supporting and distribute them around your community. This grassroots approach can spark conversations and interest among neighbors who might not be reached through digital channels. For instance, if you're advocating for library funding, your door hanger could feature a compelling fact about literacy rates and a call to action to support the local library.
• You can analyze power dynamics in your workplace by observing who influences decisions and how they do it. Start by keeping a journal of meetings and interactions, noting who speaks up, whose ideas are adopted, and how conflicts are resolved. This will help you understand the informal power structures and may guide you on how to navigate or potentially challenge them.

Harald was involved in complex negotiations throughout the period when Zoe shared the throne with Theodora.

After the rebellion, Zoe, along with her sister Theodora, who were both in command of the empire, sought to establish a new emperor to strengthen their reign. The author explores the complex and ultimately sorrowful relationships that Harald developed with Zoe and her relative, Maria Skleraina.

The rivalry between the two empresses, coupled with the search for an heir, afforded Harald opportunities to expand his influence.

The story depicts the fierce competition between Zoe and Theodora. The decision by Zoe to share the throne was safeguarded by the Varangian Guard, who acted as personal defenders for the empresses. Following the ousting of the Paphlagonians, there was a need for new leadership within the empire. Harald's search for a strategic alliance offered further opportunities to extend his influence by leveraging the empress's keenness to secure the loyalty of the guard.

Practical Tips

• Use role-playing exercises with a friend to practice handling rivalry situations. Take turns playing the role of the rival and the peacemaker, and explore different strategies for transforming the rivalry into a partnership. This can help you develop the skills to navigate similar scenarios in real life, such as when competing for a promotion or recognition.
• Consider co-authoring a blog or article with someone who has a different expertise or perspective. This act of creating something together can mirror the concept of sharing power and can result in a richer, more comprehensive piece that combines your strengths and insights.
• Create a "safety network" with friends or family members, similar to how the Varangian Guard operated as a unit. Establish a check-in system where you regularly update each other on your whereabouts or any travel plans. This mutual assurance can help ensure everyone's safety, especially when someone is venturing into unfamiliar or potentially unsafe areas.
• Create a LinkedIn group for industry collaboration. Use the platform to connect with other professionals in your field, share insights, and explore potential partnerships. For instance, if you're in the graphic design industry, you could start a group for designers and printing services to discuss trends and opportunities for working together.
• Create a local meetup or interest group focused on a topic that is also a passion of the influencers you aim to align with. As the organizer, you'll have the opportunity to invite these influencers to speak or participate, thereby creating a platform for mutual interests and networking.

Harald's promotion within the imperial guard and relationship with Empress Zoe, representing Harald reaching a pinnacle of power

The author depicts Harald's rise to the rank of manglabites as a pivotal moment, during which he was incorporated into the emperor's inner circle of trusted guards and earned distinction through the honor of receiving a sword with a gold hilt. He amassed significant riches and gained renown for his martial achievements, which bestowed upon him the power to influence imperial affairs. His involvement with Empress Zoe, though the exact nature of their relationship is speculative, placed him in a unique and possibly hazardous circumstance. Zoe had a reputation for promoting handsome young men to positions of power within the empire, fueling rumors that she intended to marry Harald.

Context

• The position of manglabites was prestigious, often reserved for those who demonstrated exceptional skill and loyalty, and it involved ceremonial duties such as escorting the emperor and participating in important state functions.
• In medieval times, receiving a sword, especially one with a gold hilt, was a significant honor. It symbolized not only martial prowess but also a deep trust and recognition from the ruling authority, often marking the recipient as a person of high status and influence.
• Soldiers in the Byzantine army, especially those in prestigious units like the Varangian Guard, often received a portion of the loot from successful campaigns, as well as bonuses from tribute paid by conquered territories.

Harald's circumstances became increasingly intricate as Constantine IX Monomachos claimed the throne, followed by his ensuing entanglement with Maria Skleraina.

The author describes the accession of Constantine IX Monomachos, Zoe's eventual choice of husband, as a turning point for Harald. Harald's predicament deepened as he had already harbored affections for Maria Skleraina, who was entwined with Constantine. The emperor's decision to promote Maria to the rank of Sebaste, followed by her transfer to the imperial quarters, further exacerbated the conflict between Harald and himself.

Context

• Maria Skleraina was a noblewoman of significant influence in the Byzantine court, known for her beauty and political connections, which made her a key figure in the power dynamics of the time.
• The title of Sebaste was a high-ranking honorific in the Byzantine Empire, often granted to individuals close to the emperor. This title indicated Maria's elevated status and influence within the court.
• The Byzantine court was known for its complex and often treacherous political environment. Promotions like Maria's were not just personal favors but strategic moves to secure alliances and strengthen the emperor's position.

Zoe's allegations against Harald highlighted his vulnerability to the ever-changing political landscape.

The empress's accusation that the Norwegian prince harbored amorous feelings for her niece Maria marked a critical juncture. Harald was left exposed by the unpredictable political currents within the Eastern Roman Empire due to these allegations. Her waning support for him put his liberty in jeopardy, as he was at risk of being imprisoned.

Context

• In Byzantine society, romantic or marital alliances were often intertwined with political strategy, making personal relationships a matter of state interest.

Other Perspectives

• Harald's political standing may have been robust enough to withstand Zoe's waning support, relying on his own alliances and political acumen.
• The notion of imprisonment could be metaphorical, referring to a loss of political freedom or influence rather than actual physical confinement.

Harald's capture and subsequent escape were decisive events that concluded his alliance with Zoe and laid the groundwork for his return to Scandinavia, marking a major transition in his period of service to the Eastern Roman Empire.

Hollway skillfully narrates the peak of Harald's adventures in Byzantium, highlighting his dramatic capture and daring flight from the heart of Constantinople. Harald, finding himself isolated and without allies in the city, encountered a decisive turning point which resulted in the permanent conclusion of his association with Zoe, necessitating his return to Scandinavia. The writer describes Harald and his fighters breaking free from their captors, seizing control of a vessel known as Maria, and charting a course to the Varangian quarter, before making their escape from the city across the sea. The renown of Harald as a cunning and innovative leader was solidified when they cleverly navigated around the Golden Horn's blockade chain, losing just a single ship during the maneuver.

Practical Tips

• Create a "decision map" for a current alliance or partnership you're involved in, outlining potential outcomes of critical decisions. Use this to anticipate and plan for decisive events that could affect the alliance, similar to how Harald's escape influenced his situation. Start by listing the major decisions you're facing, then branch out possible outcomes for each, considering how they might affect your relationship with the other party.
• Create a personal "return to roots" plan by listing skills or hobbies you've abandoned over the years. Choose one to rekindle, setting small, achievable goals to reintegrate it into your life. This could be as simple as practicing a musical instrument for ten minutes a day or revisiting a language you once started learning with a new language exchange partner.
• Reflect on your own career transitions to identify skills and experiences that can be repurposed for new roles. Just as Harald transitioned to serve a different empire, you can assess your past roles for transferable skills that could be valuable in a new industry or position. For example, if you've worked in retail, your customer service skills might be transferable to a career in hospitality.
• Develop your descriptive skills by starting a photo journal where you capture images that remind you of historical events or eras and write captions that describe the scene as if it were part of a historical narrative. Take a picture of a local building, landscape, or object and imagine what it might have been like in a different time period. Write a caption that tells this story, using vivid language to transport your audience to that era.
• You can explore historical escape routes in your city to connect with the past's adventurous spirit. Start by researching local history to identify any famous escapes or flights that occurred in your area. Then, plan a walking or biking tour to follow the path taken during these historical events, imagining the challenges faced and the resourcefulness required for such a daring escape.
• Volunteer for local organizations or causes you care about to meet people and create bonds. Volunteering not only contributes to a good cause but also puts you in touch with others who share your values, potentially leading to friendships and alliances.
• Reflect on past relationships or associations that have ended and write a letter of closure to yourself. This can help you articulate your feelings and gain personal closure, even if you never send the letter. For example, if a friendship has drifted apart, write down what that relationship meant to you, what you've learned from it, and how you've grown since it ended.
• Start a "Freedom Project" where you identify an area in your life where you feel restricted or held back, such as a bad habit or a limiting belief. Set specific, measurable goals to overcome this personal captivity. For instance, if you want to break free from excessive screen time, set a goal to reduce your daily usage by a certain amount and track your progress, rewarding yourself for each milestone achieved.
• You can explore historical maritime events to understand the significance of vessel takeovers by visiting local maritime museums or accessing online archives. By doing this, you'll gain a deeper appreciation for the strategic and political implications of such actions, similar to the seizure of the vessel Maria. For example, you might discover how the capture of ships influenced trade routes or international relations during a specific era.
• Develop a 'crew' of mentors and peers to navigate challenges together. In the spirit of a seafaring crew that works together to reach a destination, you can assemble a group of individuals who share similar goals or have expertise in areas you wish to improve. Meet regularly to exchange ideas, offer support, and hold each other accountable. If your goal is to start a small business, your crew could include a financial advisor, a marketing expert, and fellow entrepreneurs.
• Engage in a creative writing exercise where you describe your ideal escape, whether it's across the sea or to another destination. Write about the sights, sounds, and feelings associated with this journey. This can serve as a mental escape and help you articulate and visualize personal aspirations for adventure and change.
• Create a personal innovation challenge where you commit to proposing a new solution or improvement to a process every month. This will not only demonstrate your initiative but also your ability to think outside the box. Share these ideas with your peers or supervisors, and actively seek feedback to refine them. An example could be suggesting a new approach to customer feedback collection that increases response rates and provides more actionable insights.
• Improve your adaptability by setting up a "blockade run" challenge in your daily life. Choose a routine task and deliberately place an obstacle in your path. For example, if you usually drive to the grocery store, try getting there using public transportation or by walking a different route. Reflect on the experience to identify new insights or opportunities that arose from taking an alternative path.
• Develop a habit of conducting pre-mortem analyses to anticipate potential losses and devise strategies to avoid them. Before embarking on a new project or plan, gather a small group of peers to brainstorm everything that could go wrong. This exercise will help you identify weak points and create contingency plans, thereby reducing the likelihood of experiencing significant losses.

Upon his return to Scandinavia, Harald found himself embroiled in a contest for control of Norway's crown, which led to his ascent to authority and initiated a rivalry with Denmark's monarch, Svein.

In this segment of the story, Hollway narrates Harald's return to Scandinavia, where he confronts the task of seizing the Norwegian throne and becomes embroiled in a relentless struggle with Svein Ulfsson for supremacy in Denmark. The writer highlights the transformation of Harald from a skilled commander of mercenaries to a cunning and unyielding monarch, determined to establish his dominance throughout the Scandinavian regions.

Upon reaching Scandinavia, he encountered a region that was distinctly altered.

Upon his return to Scandinavia, Harald found that his time abroad had turned him into a seasoned warrior, and he observed considerable changes in the political landscape.

Harald faced opposition in his quest for the Norwegian throne while Magnus the Good was in power.

Harald discovered that, in his absence, Norway had been unified under the rule of Magnus the Good, the son of his deceased brother Olaf II. The author depicts Magnus as a sovereign who was both esteemed and compassionate, standing in stark contrast to the rigid and ambitious nature of Harald. Harald's claim to Norway's crown faced challenges, casting doubt on his position as the uncontested successor and suggesting the potential for conflict between uncle and nephew.

Practical Tips

• Improve your negotiation tactics by role-playing historical scenarios with friends or colleagues. Take a situation where a leader had to negotiate peace or form an alliance, and recreate the scenario with a modern twist. This could be as simple as negotiating chores with a roommate, but using the principles of diplomacy and compromise that you've learned from historical contexts.
• Develop a personal or community vision by drawing inspiration from historical unification efforts. Create a vision board or write a manifesto that outlines your goals for unity, whether it's within your family, social circle, or local community. Use the principles of historical unification, like shared goals and collective identity, to inform your vision. For example, if you're aiming to create a more cohesive neighborhood, organize a meeting to discuss common objectives and create a shared plan of action, inspired by the unity tactics of the past.
• Create a visual timeline of your family's history, including major events that parallel historical milestones. Use a simple graphic design tool or even a hand-drawn approach to map out births, marriages, deaths, and other significant events. This can help you visualize the flow of time and the impact of family events on your personal history.
• Enhance your esteem among peers by offering to mentor someone in an area you excel in, even if it's a small skill like organizing, cooking, or basic computer skills. Sharing knowledge not only helps others but also establishes you as a resourceful and respected individual within your community.
• Practice saying "yes" to things outside your comfort zone at least once a week to challenge your rigidity. This could be as simple as trying a new food, taking a different route to work, or attending a social event you'd typically avoid. The key is to consciously make decisions that go against your usual preferences, thereby training yourself to be more open-minded and less rigid.
• Develop a personal "claim to success" plan by identifying your goals and the potential challenges to achieving them, similar to a claim to a throne. Write down your main goal and list out all the steps you believe are necessary to achieve it. Next to each step, note down potential challenges and how you might address them. This plan will serve as a roadmap, helping you anticipate and prepare for obstacles.
• Practice reflective journaling to assess and reinforce your self-perception as a leader or key figure. Dedicate time each week to write down your achievements, challenges, and the feedback you've received. Reflect on how these elements shape your perception of your role and how others might view you. This can help you identify areas where you may need to strengthen your position or address any doubts that could undermine your perceived leadership or influence.
• Develop a personal "conflict diary" where you document and reflect on conflicts you encounter daily. Note the cause of the conflict, the perspectives of everyone involved, the resolution, and what you learned. This self-reflection will help you identify patterns in your conflict management style and areas for improvement.

Einar Thambarskelfir represented a formidable obstacle to Harald's ambitions, personifying the resilient essence of the conventional nobility.

Upon arriving at his goal, Harald met opposition from the entrenched aristocracy, notably a prominent chieftain named Einar Thambarskelfir. Einar, having played a pivotal role in restoring Magnus to the throne, saw Harald as a threat to the stability he had helped establish. Harald's ambitions were curtailed due to his limited influence over the Norwegian elite and Magnus.

Context

• Einar Thambarskelfir was a significant figure in 11th-century Norway, known for his influence and power among the Norwegian nobility. His opposition to Harald Hardrada was rooted in the complex political landscape following the death of King Olaf II.
• The established aristocracy in Norway during this period was composed of powerful chieftains and landowners who held significant sway over regional politics and were often resistant to centralization of power.

Harald perceived the conflict over the Danish throne involving Svein Ulfsson and Magnus as an opportunity to create a strategic partnership.

The writer depicts Svein Ulfsson, who, despite being driven into exile by Magnus, continued his pursuit of the Danish throne, offering Harald an opportunity to form a strategic alliance. Harald saw a chance to strengthen his dominion over both Norway and Denmark by strategically aligning with Svein.

Other Perspectives

• Svein Ulfsson's pursuit of the throne, while exiled, could have been seen as a sign of instability or weakness, which might have made Harald hesitant to form an alliance with him.

Struggling to secure a dominant role within Norway's power structure.

Hollway recounts Harald's endeavors to secure a share of Norway's rule. He could not achieve his ambitions through familial connections, thus he allied with Svein to confront Magnus, eventually agreeing to share power with his relative.

This incident demonstrates how Viking politics were often complicated by family relationships, highlighting a failed effort to bargain with Magnus for a portion of the Norwegian kingdom.

Harald initiated his quest for power by suggesting to Magnus that they share the rule of Norway, citing his royal lineage as justification. The author notes that Magnus, influenced by Einar and other Norwegian aristocrats, dismissed Harald's proposal. This illustrates how, in Viking politics, authority was frequently established by might and calculated partnerships, rather than by bonds of kinship.

Context

• Einar Thambarskelfir was a powerful noble and advisor to Magnus. His influence, along with that of other aristocrats, played a crucial role in political decisions, often prioritizing stability and their own interests over familial claims.
• Viking culture valued strength and warrior prowess, which often took precedence over familial ties in political matters. This cultural aspect influenced decisions and alliances.
• The Thing, a governing assembly, played a significant role in decision-making. Leaders needed the support of the Thing, which was composed of free men who could influence leadership through consensus or conflict.

Harald's cunning and merciless nature was highlighted through his partnership with Svein Ulfsson in their successful bid to take over Norway and Denmark.

After being rejected by Magnus, Harald formed an alliance with Svein. They began a sequence of assaults on both island and mainland settlements within the domains controlled by the Danes. Hollway attributes the creation of Harald's alliance to his pragmatic approach and willingness to employ any necessary tactics to achieve his goals. Harald's campaign showcased his ruthless disposition, ravaging the lands he sought to dominate.

Context

• The use of any necessary tactics, including raids and assaults, was typical of Viking warfare. This approach was not only about brute force but also involved strategic planning and psychological warfare to destabilize opponents.
• The raids and campaigns led by Harald and his allies would have had devastating effects on local populations, including loss of life, destruction of property, and economic disruption, which were typical consequences of Viking raids.

Harald showcased his pragmatism and knack for seizing chances by agreeing to co-rule Norway alongside Magnus.

Conscious of the threat posed by the alliance of Harald and Svein, Magnus suggested a co-regency with Harald. Harald seized the perfect opportunity to firmly establish his legitimate right to the throne and agreed to the offer. This choice underscores Harald's practical nature and his knack for seizing timely opportunities to further his goals, even when it meant accepting concessions.

Other Perspectives

• The decision to co-rule could be interpreted as a compromise rather than a demonstration of seizing an opportunity, suggesting caution rather than bold pragmatism.
• The act of accepting a co-regency could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his ability to rule alone or to secure the throne without sharing power.

Harald and Magnus's co-regency laid the groundwork for discord.

Hollway portrays the joint reign as a period characterized by intensifying disputes, with Harald and Magnus each striving to undermine the other's authority in a bid to assert their supremacy. The writer highlights the instability and fragile state of the truce, inevitably doomed to fail due to the clashing characters and aspirations involved.

The battle for dominance and backing highlighted the instability inherent in the joint monarchy.

The co-rule was characterized by competition, with both leaders struggling for dominance, management of resources, and the loyalty of the Norwegian populace. Hollway portrays the tension arising from their conflicting temperaments, emphasizing Magnus's tendency for mercy towards foes and just rule, as opposed to Harald's unyielding quest for dominance. These disputes presaged the unavoidable collapse of their joint governance arrangement.

Practical Tips

• Analyze your approach to resource management in group settings, such as shared living arrangements or team projects. If you notice a tendency to compete for resources, propose a system for equitable distribution. This could be a shared calendar for booking communal areas or a rotation system for using shared equipment.
• Reflect on your decision-making style by journaling about recent choices where you've shown either mercy or assertiveness. Write down the outcomes and how they made you feel. This self-reflection can help you understand your natural inclinations and their impact on your life and relationships.

Harald's growing unpopularity with the Norwegians, due to his severe rule and burdensome taxation, was markedly different from the compassionate governance associated with Magnus the Benevolent.

The writer illustrates that Harald's harsh rule and burdensome taxation diminished his popularity with the Norwegians, unlike the benevolent reign of Magnus. Harald's actions sowed seeds of unrest and animosity, escalating conflicts that led to royal confrontations and eventually paved the way for a rebellion against his leadership.

Context

• Harald's focus on expanding his territory and engaging in military campaigns, such as his involvement in England and Denmark, required substantial resources, contributing to the heavy taxation.
• Magnus was known for implementing policies that were aimed at reducing the burden on his people, such as lowering taxes and reforming legal codes to be more just and fair.
• Rebellions during this period often involved a combination of local leaders and discontented citizens who sought to restore more favorable conditions, possibly rallying around a figure who promised change.

Harald's rise to the throne, following Magnus's death, challenged the prevailing dominance of Denmark.

Harald ascended to the throne of Norway following the untimely death of Magnus. Harald sustained his control over Norway and laid claim to the Danish crown; yet, as Magnus approached death, he ceased his quest for the throne, leaving the question of succession to the Danish monarchy unresolved and inevitably leading to strife.

Context

• Magnus's decision to stop pursuing the Danish throne might have been influenced by political pressures, health issues, or a desire to stabilize his existing territories before his death.
• During the 11th century, Scandinavia was a region of shifting alliances and power struggles. Denmark, under King Sweyn II, was a dominant force in the region, often exerting influence over Norway and Sweden.

Harald's governance of Norway and his disputes with Svein Ulfsson

Harald was the uncontested monarch of Norway and spent fifteen years in conflict with Svein Ulfsson vying for dominance over Denmark. The story chronicles the relentless sequence of military offensives that the pair of commanders engaged in against each other, their repeated attempts to broker peace, and finally, their success in settling the conflict.

Harald's relentless pursuit of power was evident when he resumed conflicts in Denmark after his previous pact with Svein fell apart.

Hollway suggests that the shared ambitions of Harald and Svein, along with the deceptive counsel from their advisors, led to the disintegration of their agreement. Harald's military endeavors throughout Denmark were characterized by his relentless pursuit of supremacy, with his forces conducting forceful raids that resulted in extensive devastation.

Other Perspectives

• The pact's failure could have been due to mutual misunderstandings or external influences rather than the shared ambitions and deceptive counsel of advisors, suggesting a more complex diplomatic breakdown.
• Shared ambitions do not necessarily lead to conflict; they can also foster cooperation if the parties involved see mutual benefit in working together.
• The extent of the devastation could be exaggerated or misreported, as historical accounts often come from biased sources or may lack comprehensive evidence.

Harald's efforts to consolidate his rule in Norway through both diplomacy and force, revealing his increasingly tyrannical nature

The author describes Harald's efforts to consolidate his rule in Norway. He utilized diplomatic tactics and formed matrimonial alliances to ensure the allegiance of powerful allies, while also using force to overcome adversaries, showcasing his growing tendency towards autocracy. Harald is portrayed by Hollway as a leader caught in the struggle between his natural inclination towards benevolence and the increasing inclination to enforce strict and authoritarian actions to strengthen his rule.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal 'alliance portfolio' to track and develop potential alliances. Similar to a financial portfolio, this document would detail the 'investments' you have in terms of relationships. Include contacts from various sectors, their interests, and how you might help each other. Periodically review and update this portfolio, looking for opportunities to strengthen these connections through shared projects or by offering help with challenges they might be facing.
• Practice assertive communication in everyday situations to build confidence in handling conflicts. Start with low-stakes scenarios, like negotiating a better seat at a restaurant or returning a purchase. The goal is to get comfortable with expressing your needs and standing your ground in a respectful manner, which can translate to more significant adversarial situations.
• Seek feedback from peers or family members about your behavior in group settings. Ask them to be honest about times when they felt you were being overbearing or dismissive. Use this feedback to adjust your behavior, ensuring that you're considering the needs and contributions of others rather than dominating conversations or decisions.
• Volunteer for a role that requires both leadership and compassion, like mentoring or coaching. Pay attention to how you navigate the dual responsibilities of guiding and empowering others. This experience can provide practical insights into blending authority with benevolence in your personal interactions.
• Practice active listening in conversations by summarizing what the other person has said before you respond, to ensure you fully understand their perspective. This can help counteract autocratic inclinations by valuing others' input. For instance, in a team meeting, instead of immediately pushing your agenda, first summarize a colleague's suggestion to show that you are considering their viewpoint.

Harald's attack on Hedeby not only led to its ruin but also severely disrupted a vital center that was instrumental in Denmark's wealth and power.

Harald's significant achievements in this period encompass his attack on Hedeby, an essential trading center situated within the Danish borders. Hollway emphasizes Harald's effective seizure of the city's wealth and his tactical destruction of its core infrastructures, which eliminated its role as a Danish bastion and disrupted Scandinavian trade routes. This strategy initially achieved his objectives, but eventually it resulted in the rise of German trading hubs as key figures in that capacity.

Context

• The destruction of Hedeby disrupted not only local economies but also the broader Scandinavian trade networks. This would have affected the flow of goods such as furs, amber, and slaves, which were central to the Viking economy.
• The attack on Hedeby weakened Danish control over the region, as the city was not only a commercial center but also a political one. This loss of control could have led to shifts in power dynamics within Scandinavia.
• Excavations at Hedeby have revealed extensive fortifications and remnants of its infrastructure, providing insights into its significance and the scale of destruction it suffered during Harald's attack.
• The rise of German trading hubs contributed to the strengthening of the Holy Roman Empire's influence in Northern Europe, as these cities became integral to its economic infrastructure.

Harald's tactical acumen and skill were highlighted by his victorious clash and ensuing victory against Svein at Nisa.

Harald's and Svein's crucial clash during the Nisa conflict unfolded near the shores bordering the Kattegat, in present-day Sweden. The author vividly depicts the clash of Viking fleets as a brutal and bloody battle. Harald and his warriors fought fiercely and managed to take over the flagship of Svein, forcing the Danish chieftain to flee. Harald's victory was indisputable, solidifying his control over Norway and significantly weakening Svein's claim to the Danish throne.

Context

• Victories in battles such as Nisa were often celebrated in Norse sagas and poetry, contributing to the legendary status of leaders like Harald and influencing how they were remembered in history.
• Battles often involved longships, which were agile and designed for both open sea and coastal waters. Commanding a fleet required strategic positioning and knowledge of the local geography.
• Combatants typically used weapons such as axes, swords, and spears, and wore armor made from materials like chainmail or leather, contributing to the intense and personal nature of the fighting.
• In Viking naval battles, capturing the enemy's flagship was a significant achievement as it often served as the command center and symbol of leadership, demoralizing the opponent's forces.

Harald skillfully managed the complex political landscape of Scandinavia, establishing tranquility with Svein while concurrently expanding his territory.

The writer details Harald's accomplishment in securing a lasting agreement of peace with Svein Ulfsson. The pact established clear territorial boundaries, which allowed the rulers of Denmark and Norway to consolidate their power within their respective domains. Harald's reign as leader became increasingly characterized by his weariness due to the continuous battles that defined his rule. Having secured peace in the southern regions, he could finally turn his attention to the Norwegian territories that remained loyal to Hakon Ivarsson during the rebellion.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal "political landscape" map of your workplace or community by identifying key stakeholders, their interests, and potential alliances. Use this map to navigate social dynamics more effectively. For example, if you're working on a project at work, identify who can influence its success, what they value, and how you can align your project goals with their interests to gain support.
• Develop a personal ritual to symbolize and reinforce your commitment to tranquility in your daily life. This could be a daily five-minute meditation where you reflect on your interactions and how they align with your goal of peace. Alternatively, you might wear a specific piece of jewelry or carry a token in your pocket as a physical reminder to remain calm and seek harmony in your interactions throughout the day.
• You can expand your social territory by initiating conversations with strangers once a week. Start by choosing a public place like a coffee shop or park, and approach someone with a friendly comment or question. This practice can help you become more comfortable with unfamiliar social interactions and gradually increase your network.
• Apply the principle of setting boundaries to your work-life balance by designating specific times for work and rest. Decide on a time each evening after which you will not check work emails or take calls, much like a peace treaty that sets times of truce. This can help you maintain a healthy balance and reduce stress.
• Create a pact with a peer to achieve mutual goals, such as fitness or learning a new skill. By agreeing to hold each other accountable, share resources, and provide moral support, you can emulate the concept of consolidating power through alliances. This could involve regular check-ins, shared planning, and combined efforts to overcome obstacles.
• Reflect on your daily routines to identify and eliminate unnecessary battles. Just as Harald's reign was marked by weariness from constant conflict, modern life can be filled with small, draining battles that contribute to overall fatigue. Take a week to note down moments that feel like a struggle, whether it's a contentious email exchange or a frustrating commute. After identifying these moments, brainstorm ways to reduce their frequency or intensity, such as setting clearer communication boundaries or finding a less congested route to work.
• You can foster peaceful relationships by starting a 'Peace Pledge' initiative in your neighborhood. Create a simple pledge that encourages neighbors to commit to non-violent conflict resolution and community support. Distribute the pledge through local social media groups or print flyers, and organize a small event to discuss the importance of maintaining a peaceful community.
• Enhance your leadership abilities by observing local community leaders and their methods of garnering support. Take note of how they communicate with their constituents, especially during times of change or challenge, and apply these observations to your own methods of influencing and leading groups, much like Harald would have had to secure loyalty during a rebellion.

Harald Hardrada's ambition to expand Scandinavian territories reached its peak with his attack on England, which led to him being known as "the final great Viking."

In the final chapters, the story delves into Harald's later period of rule over Norway, his attempts to expand his territory, his doomed expedition to England, and his legacy as the quintessential Viking warrior.

He established his dominance across Norway.

Harald managed to secure a ceasefire with Denmark but faced opposition from groups within his own territory. As soon as he was crowned in Norway, he embarked on a strategic initiative to consolidate his power, diligently solidifying his authority before setting off for England in 1066, through a combination of clever diplomacy and unwavering martial force, thereby cultivating a legacy that garnered both respect and enmity.

Harald established his dominance and cemented his authority by strategically outwitting and rigorously handling rivals like Einar Thambarskelfir.

Hollway details the tactical elimination of significant rivals by Harald, among them Einar Thambarskelfir. Harald cunningly enticed Einar into the palace, resulting in both Einar and his son being treacherously slain. This strategy, while it strengthened his rule and secured the robustness of his leadership, significantly eroded his popularity with the populace, leading to a change in loyalty among many former allies. Harald successfully suppressed potential uprisings by skillfully blending intimidation, forging strategic alliances, and demonstrating sporadic acts of kindness.

Context

• The elimination of rivals like Einar was part of Harald's broader efforts to establish a strong, centralized monarchy in Norway, which had long-term implications for the country's political structure.
• In Viking society, loyalty was often tied to personal relationships and mutual benefit. Harald's betrayal of Einar Thambarskelfir might have been seen as a breach of these norms, leading to a loss of trust among his followers.
• Sporadic acts of kindness by rulers like Harald could include granting land, titles, or privileges to loyal subjects, or providing aid during times of famine or hardship, which helped to build goodwill and loyalty among the populace.

Harald exhibited his capacity for leadership by taking decisive action to maintain his grip on power when faced with opposition and rebellion among his people.

The author depicts a pattern in which Harald's increasingly tyrannical rule alienated both the nobility and the wider populace. Individuals who did not fulfill their tax obligations or opposed his authority faced swift and severe consequences. Harald quelled dissent by igniting dwellings and enforcing harsh punishments on individuals who defied his authority. He references the verses penned by Thjodolf, highlighting the difficulty poets encountered in adequately describing the devastating effects Harald's relentless military expeditions had, rendering the Opplands desolate and uninhabited.

Context

• The use of harsh punishments and military force to suppress dissent was a typical strategy for maintaining control in medieval societies, where loyalty was often secured through fear and coercion.
• Frequent military campaigns could drain resources and manpower, leading to resentment among those who were left to manage depleted lands and face economic hardship.
• The imposition of taxes and tributes was a common practice to fund military activities. Non-compliance could disrupt the economic stability necessary for sustaining a ruler's power and ambitions.
• Thjodolf was a skald, or poet, in the Norse tradition, whose role was to compose and recite poetry that often chronicled the deeds of kings and warriors, serving both as entertainment and historical record.

Harald's complex familial ties manifested through his relationships with relatives and those in his royal circle, and were also reflected in his unions with Elisaveta and Thora.

Hollway explores the complexities of Harald's personal life, detailing his matrimonial connections, such as his union with Elisaveta from Kiev and his nuptials with Thora Thorbergsdottir. The writer suggests that Harald's waning fondness for his Rus queen Elisaveta, due to their lack of a male heir, prompted him to send her back to Kiev and promote Thora, who had borne him sons, as his chief consort. She never rose to a role of independent rule. Harald skillfully navigated the complex dynamics of his court, often placing his most trusted advisors in competitive stances to maintain his uncontested power, while he utilized matrimonial alliances with the strategic acumen characteristic of his governance.

Practical Tips

• Start a monthly 'family and friends' roundtable discussion where you discuss topics that are important to your group, such as planning for family events or addressing any ongoing issues. This creates a dedicated space for open communication, ensuring that everyone feels heard and connected, which can lead to stronger, more cohesive relationships.

Other Perspectives

• It is possible that Elisaveta's return to Kiev was a mutual decision or even initiated by Elisaveta herself for reasons not mentioned, such as a desire to return to her homeland or to escape a hostile court environment.
• The idea that Thora became chief consort might oversimplify the nature of royal relationships and ignore the potential influence and power of Elisaveta or other figures in the royal circle.
• Thora's lack of independent rule could be seen as a reflection of the societal norms and gender roles of the time, rather than a personal failure or lack of capability.
• The perception of skillful navigation could be a result of historical bias, where chroniclers and historians favor the narrative of a strong and cunning ruler over a more nuanced reality.
• It could prevent the most capable advisors from rising to prominence if they are not willing to engage in competitive tactics, thus depriving Harald of the best possible counsel.
• The strategic value of matrimonial alliances often hinges on producing heirs, which can be an unpredictable and uncontrollable outcome, thus making it a risky long-term strategy.

Harald's tenure as a leader was marked by a tension between his duties to his realm and his individual ambition to enlarge his dominions, highlighting his personal conflicts and quest for fame.

The author portrays Harald as he navigates the complexities of everyday rule, tackling economic challenges, judicial disputes, and plots, all while endeavoring to achieve his dreams of fame and broadening his realm. Harald's ambition to enlarge his domain led him to observe the unstable political situation in England, which ultimately swayed his decision to launch an offensive for territorial acquisition.

Context

• Harald Hardrada, often referred to as "The Last Viking," was a Norwegian king known for his military prowess and ambition. His reign was during a time when Scandinavian rulers frequently sought to expand their territories through conquest.
• Medieval Scandinavian societies had complex legal systems based on customary laws. Kings like Harald were responsible for upholding justice, which often involved resolving disputes among nobles and ensuring loyalty.
• Harald believed he had a legitimate claim to the English throne through an agreement with the former King of England, Harthacnut, and his father, King Magnus I of Norway.

Embarking on a quest to conquer unknown lands.

After consolidating his rule in Norway, but for fifteen years unable to achieve his ultimate ambition of capturing Denmark, Harald again turned his attention southward, but this time not on the Danes.

In the waning years of Edward the Confessor's reign, England found new opportunities for expanding its territories.

Harald evaluated the tactical terrain of England in the concluding period of Edward the Confessor's reign, which was marked by the absence of immediate successors to the crown. The contested inheritance opened avenues for territorial expansion, with Tostig Godwinson and other contenders vying for kingship. Harald saw the chaos as a chance to reaffirm Norway's unfulfilled claim to England after his nephew Magnus passed away.

Context

• The period was characterized by shifting alliances and the ambitions of various European rulers, including William of Normandy, who also had a claim to the English throne.
• Considerations would include the logistics of transporting troops across the North Sea, securing supply lines, and maintaining communication with Norway during the campaign.
• Edward the Confessor died without a direct heir, which led to a power vacuum. This absence of a clear successor created a volatile situation, as multiple claimants emerged, each with different degrees of legitimacy and support.

Harald showcased his strategic acumen and drive for power by allying with Tostig Godwinson in an effort to seize control of England and reclaim Northumbria.

The narrative describes how Harald came across Tostig Godwinson, once the Earl of Northumbria, now exiled from England by his brother Harold. Harald perceived a chance to gain by joining forces with Tostig, who was intent on invading England, to reclaim his previous position and overthrow his brother.

Context

• Harald and Tostig were defeated at Stamford Bridge, which was a pivotal moment in the events leading to the Norman Conquest of England. This defeat diminished the threat to Harold Godwinson from the north, but left him vulnerable to William the Conqueror's invasion from the south.
• The rebellion against Tostig was supported by King Edward the Confessor, who appointed Morcar as the new Earl of Northumbria.
• The conflict between Tostig and Harold Godwinson reflects the broader theme of familial rivalry and betrayal common in medieval power struggles.

Harald exerted his power and unified his northern lands to create a coalition focused on conquest.

Hollway details Harald's accumulation of a formidable force through the exploitation of his domain's resources and the establishment of alliances across the Orkney Islands and in Scotland. The author notes that this demonstrated Harald's power and influence in the North as he gathered a fleet of over 300 longships and an army of more than 9,000 men. The Norsemen's ethos was characterized by a robust unity within Norway coupled with an enduring fascination with the idea of conquest.

Context

• The unification and subsequent conquests were driven by economic motivations, such as the desire to control trade routes, acquire resources, and gain wealth through plunder and tribute from conquered territories.
• Forming alliances with the Orkney Islands and Scotland would have involved complex negotiations and possibly mutual defense pacts or shared interests against common enemies.
• These were advanced naval vessels that allowed the Norsemen to travel vast distances, facilitating both trade and conquest. Their design enabled swift movement and the ability to navigate both open seas and shallow rivers.

Harald signified his resurgence in Viking conquests with the capture of York after invading England, where he also engaged in the battle at Fulford.

The author meticulously describes Harald's forceful invasion of England, reminiscent of the Viking-style raids that initiated his military adventures. The Norwegian fleet reached the shores of Yorkshire. Harald's forces secured a major triumph at Fulford, just south of York, through a tactical maneuver that lured the leaders from Mercia and Northumbria out of their strongholds. Following a vigorous clash in which the Norwegians asserted their superiority, the English had no choice but to retreat to York. Harald's victory resulted in the surrender of the city. Harald turned his attention to the southern regions following his establishment in England, aiming to capture the city of London and claim the throne of England.

Context

• The Vikings had a long history of raiding and settling in England, dating back to the late 8th century. By the time of Harald's invasion, there had been several periods of Viking control, particularly in the Danelaw region.
• Harald Hardrada, the King of Norway, led the Viking forces. He was allied with Tostig Godwinson, the exiled brother of the English King Harold Godwinson.
• Yorkshire, located in the northern part of England, was a strategic location due to its proximity to the North Sea, making it accessible for Viking longships. Its capture was crucial for controlling northern England.
• The Battle of Fulford took place on September 20, 1066, and was part of the events leading up to the Norman Conquest of England. It was a precursor to the more famous Battle of Hastings.
• Capturing London was crucial because it was the political and economic center of England, and controlling it would significantly bolster Harald's claim to the throne.

The skirmish that occurred at Stamford Bridge and the subsequent developments.

Hollway portrays the battle at Stamford Bridge as a pivotal moment with profound consequences for King Harald, and it also greatly influenced the course of history in England, marking a definitive end to the Viking Age. He viewed the conflict as a clash between two unique cultures and their individual approaches to warfare.

The campaign reached a pivotal moment when English King Harold Godwinson arrived, coupled with Harald's lethal presumption of victory.

The author illustrates that Harold Godwinson, upon his unexpected rise to the English monarchy, suddenly arrived with his troops at Stamford Bridge. Harold, having learned of the invasion, made a forced march from London, covering 200 miles in just four days. Harald and his companions were unexpectedly met with more than just a simple exchange of captives. Hollway suggests that Harald's heightened sense of assurance, bolstered by his triumph at Fulford, marked a pivotal moment in the military campaign. The Norsemen encountered an English army that was both skilled and imposing, even though they were outnumbered and unprepared for a major battle.

Context

• Harold Godwinson's rapid march from London to Stamford Bridge was a remarkable military feat, demonstrating his leadership and the discipline of his troops. This swift movement allowed him to surprise the Norwegian forces.
• Covering 200 miles in four days meant the troops averaged about 50 miles per day, which was an extraordinary pace for an army on foot, especially considering the rough terrain and the need to carry equipment and supplies.
• The English forces, despite being outnumbered, utilized effective military tactics and the element of surprise to gain an advantage over the Norsemen.
• Harald Hardrada's presumption of victory was partly due to his previous successes and the belief that the English forces would not be able to mobilize quickly enough to pose a significant threat.

Harald's death in the final conflict marked not only the end of his reign but also the termination of the period recognized as the Viking Age.

Hollway delivers an enthralling portrayal that highlights Harald's valiant last stand. Despite being outnumbered and confronting an enemy with advanced tactics, the Norse monarch fought valiantly yet met his demise when an arrow struck his neck. The writer posits that his death marked the end of his reign as well as the final chapter of the Viking Age. After achieving initial successes, Prince Olaf, Skuli—the son of Tostig—and the Orkney chieftains Paul and Erlend, who had remained with the naval forces, found themselves forced to strategize a withdrawal when their troops suffered a definitive defeat. After their loss, a mere twenty-four ships bore the survivors of Harald's incursion back to their native land.

Practical Tips

• Engage in a symbolic 'end of reign' ritual to mark a personal transition. For example, if you're retiring from a career, you might plant a tree to symbolize growth beyond your professional identity. This act can serve as a tangible acknowledgment of change and a way to embrace new beginnings.
• Engage with local history by visiting museums, historical sites, or participating in community history projects to better understand the significance of historical transitions in your own region.
• Create a "valor playlist" of songs that inspire courage and fortitude. Music can be a powerful motivator, so curate a list of tracks that make you feel invincible and play it when facing daunting tasks. This can serve as a personal anthem, boosting your morale and reminding you of the warrior spirit within, ready to tackle any challenge head-on.
• Develop a habit of reading historical accounts or biographies of underdog figures who have overcome great odds. While reading, take notes on the strategies they employed, and brainstorm ways you could adapt these strategies to your personal or professional challenges. This exercise will not only provide you with a repository of tactics but also inspire you to think outside the box when faced with your own "advanced tactics."
• If you have a different kind of assertion or concept from a book that you would like to apply to your life, please provide that information, and I can certainly help with creating original strategies for personal application.
• Reflect on past setbacks to develop a personal retreat plan. When you face a defeat or setback in any area of your life, take time to analyze what went wrong and how you can strategically withdraw to regroup. For example, if you didn't get a job you interviewed for, review the interview process, identify areas for improvement, and plan your next steps without rushing into another application.
• Create a visual representation of your support network by drawing a ship and filling it with the names of people and resources that would help you through a crisis. This exercise can help you appreciate the 'crew' you have in your life and may highlight areas where you could strengthen your support system.

Harald's unyielding aspirations followed by the retreat of troops from Norway illustrate the enduring impact of Viking raids on England.

Hollway describes the retreat of Norwegian troops from English soil as a critical juncture in historical occurrences. The clash led to a notable triumph for the English; however, it also weakened Harold's army, making them vulnerable to the subsequent invasion led by Duke William just three weeks later. While the era of Viking incursions into England had ceased, their enduring influence on the nation's governance and cultural essence would resonate throughout history.

Context

• The retreat was not just a military withdrawal but also symbolized the decline of Norwegian influence in England, which had been significant during earlier Viking settlements and raids.
• The need to defend against Viking raids prompted advancements in military tactics and fortifications, such as the construction of burhs (fortified towns) by King Alfred the Great.
• The depletion of Harold's forces meant that he had fewer troops and resources to defend against Duke William of Normandy, impacting the outcome of the subsequent Battle of Hastings.
• The Norman Conquest had profound effects on English society, law, and language, marking the end of Anglo-Saxon rule and the beginning of Norman influence in England.
• Viking trade routes and economic practices had a lasting effect on English commerce, contributing to the development of towns and markets.
• Old Norse, the language of the Vikings, contributed many words to the English language, including everyday terms like "sky," "egg," and "knife."

Harald Hardrada is often remembered as the final great Viking warrior.

In the final part of the book, the author captures Harald Hardrada's lasting impact, portraying him as a complex and divisive figure who embodied the full spectrum of qualities, both commendable and deplorable, that characterized the era of the Vikings.

Harald's reputation was cemented by blending the classic Viking traits of martial skill and adventurousness with his sharp political insight and unwavering determination.

In his portrayal, Hollway presents Harald Hardrada as a ruler who personified the archetypal Viking attributes, including combat prowess, an eagerness for exploration, and a valiant spirit, in addition to exhibiting astute political tactics, a robust ambition for personal achievement, and unwavering commitment to his advancement. He exercised strict control in every possible manner. Harald's unique traits, including both his strengths and weaknesses, were crucial in his rise to fame as a commander of mercenaries, his rightful claim to the throne of Norway, and, in the end, his downfall.

Other Perspectives

• Describing Harald's political insight as sharp could be contested by examining some of his decisions that led to failures or setbacks, suggesting that his political acumen was not infallible.
• The idea of strict control could be interpreted as authoritarian, but it's possible that Harald's leadership style also included negotiation and compromise, which are not typically associated with strict control.
• The idea that weaknesses were crucial to his downfall might be an oversimplification; it could be argued that what are perceived as weaknesses could have also been strengths in a different context, or that his downfall was the result of strategic miscalculations rather than personal flaws.