PDF Summary:The Great Derangement, by Amitav Ghosh

In The Great Derangement, Amitav Ghosh grapples with the challenges of representing climate change in literature and art. He argues that the boundaries between human society and the natural world are rapidly dissolving in our current epoch, known as the Anthropocene. This blurring of lines poses a significant dilemma for conventional narrative techniques that focus on individual experiences.

Ghosh traces the historical roots of the fossil fuel-driven economy, critiquing its colonial underpinnings and uneven impacts across the globe. He calls for fundamentally reevaluating humanity's relationship with nature and interrogating notions of freedom, nationalism, and justice amidst this existential threat that transcends borders and generations.

(continued)...

• The distinction between fiction and non-fiction is maintained by the intentions and methods of the author or creator, not by the subject matter such as climate change.
• The complexity attributed to climate change in literature might not be a complication but an evolution of literary forms adapting to new global realities.
• While Amitav Ghosh does blend fiction with real-life events in "The Hungry Tide," it is a common literary technique used by many authors and may not be as unique to Ghosh's work as suggested.
• The narrative of interconnectedness, while valuable, might not fully capture the unique challenges faced by indigenous populations and other marginalized groups who have a different relationship with the environment and may not see their specific concerns adequately represented in a global narrative.
• Fiction has always evolved to reflect societal changes and can adapt to include blurred boundaries without losing its essence.
• This focus may also neglect the role of external forces and larger systemic factors that shape personal experiences, thereby providing an incomplete picture of reality.
• One could challenge the idea that the impact of climate change on the core of existence is a universally accepted truth, suggesting instead that it is a subjective interpretation open to debate and dependent on individual worldviews.

The widespread effects originate from historical, geopolitical, and colonial foundations which culminated in the creation of a worldwide economic system dependent on fossil fuels.

The section scrutinizes the development and global impact of the fossil fuel-driven economy, emphasizing the significant role that imperial and colonial pursuits have played in shaping its path and outcomes. The author Amitav Ghosh presents a theory that links the rise of industrial capitalism, the subsequent climate crisis, and the historical consequences of imperialist exploitation and disparate development.

The swift intensification of industrial operations throughout Asia at the close of the 20th century played a major role in the climate crisis, which is deeply intertwined with the legacy of colonial exploitation and global disparities in progress.

Ghosh underscores the pivotal role that the Asian continent has played during the period referred to as the Anthropocene. He emphasizes that the rapid industrial progress that occurred after the continent's belated integration with the fossil fuel-driven economy has significantly exacerbated the environmental crisis. He argues that this swift escalation has compressed the timeframe for adaptation and proactive steps, placing a disproportionate burden on Asian populations.

He examines the story that focuses on Europe, challenging the idea that the Industrial Revolution is solely a Western occurrence. The writer underscores that nations including Burma and China had reached significant milestones in technology and had begun exploiting fossil fuels prior to Western engagement.

The failure to recognize the urgency of the climate crisis is linked to the suppression of native industrial development in colonized regions like India and Burma.

Ghosh argues that colonialism intentionally obstructed the development of an economy dependent on carbon in regions like India and Burma. He provides historical evidence showing that while Indian industrialists initially understood and adopted steam technology, they later encountered barriers designed to maintain Western dominance. The author highlights Dwarkanath Tagore, a distinguished industrialist from Bengal who pioneered steamer towing services and acquired coal mines, yet his endeavors were hindered by the lack of support from the East India Company. Amitav Ghosh explores the suppression of the indigenous shipbuilding industry in Mumbai by the British, an industry that had the potential to compete with the best shipyards in Europe.

The writer explores the robust and thriving oil sector at Yenangyaung, Burma, emphasizing its dynamic state long before the invention of the internal combustion engine. King Mindon, along with other leaders of Burma, was instrumental in transforming the oil sector into a nationally controlled and contemporary industry, which in turn solidified ties with global trade networks. However, the advancement of these initiatives ceased when a British company assumed control of the oil fields after Burma became part of the British dominion.

Practical Tips

• You can explore the impact of historical economic barriers by starting a blog or podcast discussing the evolution of technology in different cultures. By researching and sharing stories about how various societies have adopted or resisted new technologies, you'll gain a deeper understanding of the forces that shape technological progress and the role of cultural and economic factors.
• Strengthen your negotiation skills by practicing in low-stakes situations. This will prepare you to better advocate for support when you need it. Try negotiating small things like a better phone plan or a discount on a purchase. This practice will build your confidence and skill set for more significant negotiations related to your goals.
• Explore local history by visiting maritime museums or shipyards to gain a deeper understanding of shipbuilding heritage and its impact on regional development. By doing this, you'll connect with the past and appreciate the complexities of historical events on modern industries. For example, if you're in a coastal city, find a maritime museum and ask about the history of shipbuilding in the area.
• Explore collaboration with local universities or tech hubs to foster innovation in a traditional sector. If you're into local crafts, reach out to these institutions to see how new materials or 3D printing could create novel products while preserving the essence of the craft.
• Start a blog or social media page that highlights local businesses and initiatives that are trying to break through in markets controlled by larger, external entities. Share stories of local entrepreneurs, their challenges, and their successes. This could include interviews with local business owners who are finding innovative ways to carve out a niche for themselves despite the dominance of larger companies.

Prominent Asian intellectuals, among them Gandhi and Zhang Shizhao, strongly criticized the industrial and consumerist lifestyle, aiming to avert the catastrophic environmental consequences of unchecked economic growth, yet their viewpoint was ultimately overshadowed.

Ghosh emphasizes the resistance to industrial capitalism in Asia by figures such as Mahatma Gandhi and others. The intellectuals, drawing on their distinct cultural legacies, acknowledged that an industrialized society was inappropriate and that an economy predicated on constant consumption is inherently unsustainable.

Gandhi's promotion of a lifestyle that rejected the Western model of industrial expansion, coupled with Zhang Shizhao's emphasis on limited resources, foresaw contemporary concerns regarding ecological limits. Their vision, however, was ultimately overshadowed by the imperative for economic growth and modernization that followed decolonization.

Practical Tips

• Implement a 'resource-sharing initiative' with friends or neighbors to maximize the use of items that aren't needed daily. Share tools, appliances, or even books and DVDs. By doing this, you collectively reduce the number of products each household needs to buy, leading to less production and consumption on a broader scale.
• Opt for local and handmade products to support small-scale artisans and farmers. By purchasing locally produced goods, you contribute to the local economy and reduce the carbon footprint associated with long-distance transportation of goods. This choice fosters a community-based economy and moves away from industrialized production methods.
• Create a personal resource inventory to manage and optimize what you have by listing all the items you own, their condition, and frequency of use. This can help you realize which items are underutilized and could be sold or donated, thereby decluttering your space and potentially providing extra income or tax deductions.

The emergence of the worldwide economy reliant on carbon was shaped by power dynamics that prioritized the interests of Western countries, emphasizing imperial dominance over environmental considerations.

Ghosh suggests a clear link between the emergence of the global carbon economy and the colonial activities that occurred concurrently. He suggests that Western dominance was solidified as the Industrial Revolution progressed in tandem with the expansion of European empires. The industrial and martial capabilities of Western countries were bolstered by harnessing resources like coal and oil, clearly demonstrated in the use of steam-powered ships in conflicts related to the opium trade.

The extended fight for self-governance across the continents of Asia and Africa may have inadvertently delayed the recognition of the climate crisis. Had these regions advanced their industrial capabilities earlier, the concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases could have hit critical thresholds more swiftly. In this historical context, he highlights the necessity of acknowledging the disparate impacts various countries have had on climate change, stressing the crucial element of equitable responsibility for the condition of our planet.

The rise of the fossil fuel sector resulted in the widespread marginalization and exploitation of non-Western populations, hindering their development goals.

Ghosh emphasizes the uneven consequences that different communities face within an economy reliant on fossil fuels. He highlights the exploitation and marginalization of non-Western populations, who were denied the benefits of industrialization while suffering its negative consequences.

He underscores the double standards of Western nations that advocate for limitations on fossil fuel usage in still-developing countries while they themselves persist in consuming substantial amounts of energy. He underscores the disapproval from Western countries concerning the reliance of India on coal-generated power, even though the per capita coal consumption in these nations is significantly higher.

Other Perspectives

• The development goals of non-Western populations have been influenced by a variety of factors, including colonial histories, local governance, and global economic systems, not solely the rise of the fossil fuel sector.
• The benefits of industrialization, such as improved infrastructure, increased employment, and technological advancements, have reached various non-Western countries, albeit to varying degrees and not without accompanying challenges.
• Some Western nations may contend that their high energy consumption is coupled with efforts to improve energy efficiency and reduce waste, which are practices they also promote internationally.
• Some may argue that the historical context is different, with Western countries having relied on coal during their industrialization period when the global understanding of environmental impacts was not as clear as it is today.

The predicament of our current geological epoch, known as the Anthropocene, arises not just from capitalist endeavors but is also linked with the lingering effects of colonialism and the uneven allocation of power worldwide.

In his final comments, Ghosh underscores the interconnectedness of financial systems, the growth of empires, and environmental obstacles. He argues that blaming the dawn of the Anthropocene solely on capitalist structures overly simplifies the matter, emphasizing the need to recognize the enduring impact of colonial legacies on global power structures and the differing levels of vulnerability across communities. Amitav Ghosh argues that addressing climate change and ensuring an equitable strategy necessitates a deep understanding of historical background.

Context

• Communities in low-lying coastal areas or regions prone to extreme weather events face greater risks from climate change, such as flooding and hurricanes, compared to those in more stable environments.

Other Perspectives

• The focus on capitalism and colonialism might overlook the role of consumer culture and the choices made by individuals that contribute to environmental issues.
• Internal factors within countries, such as corruption, political instability, and economic mismanagement, can also significantly affect their position in global power structures, independent of colonial legacies.
• It could be contended that an equitable strategy informed by historical backgrounds might not be feasible due to the complexity of global politics and the difficulty in achieving consensus on historical interpretations.

The extensive repercussions of climate change are intertwined with issues related to justice, the administration of policies, and fair treatment.

This section explores the impact of changing weather patterns on political dynamics, especially in the context of redefining our understanding of freedom, transforming the boundaries of nations, and influencing global notions of justice. Ghosh argues that the ecological crisis demands a thorough reevaluation of the foundational beliefs and frameworks that support conventional political institutions.

The intensifying dilemma of global warming calls into question our conventional beliefs about personal liberty, rights, and societal engagement, which stem from the conviction that individuals and nations are autonomous.

Ghosh argues that the prevailing ecological crisis calls into question the core principles of autonomy and control that lie at the heart of modern political ideology. Ghosh suggests that these concepts erroneously assume that individuals operate autonomously and that nation-states possess absolute authority.

The unbridled power of climate change challenges the fundamental tenet of liberal ideology, which is the freedom of individuals to make their own choices, by imposing restrictions on their ability to decide and act. The effects of climate change, which are interconnected and global in scope, render the concept of national borders inadequate. He explores the concept of a pervasive, hidden influence of the government that is increasingly taking control of civic issues, emphasizing the widening chasm between the outward facade of the political sphere and the actual exercise of power.

The notion of the Anthropocene emphasizes how human endeavors are inextricably linked with processes and systems beyond our mastery, thereby questioning the idea of an independent, self-determining individual as suggested by liberal philosophy.

Ghosh contests the notion that singular ethical quests ought to serve as the foundational concept for both literature and political ideology. He argues that our focus on inward journeys distracts us from developing the essential ability to envision various possible futures, which is vital for confronting the issues brought about by climate change. He suggests that the prevailing cultural trend, which is influenced by the merging of political and ethical concerns and underscores individualism, has complicated our ability to view issues through a collective lens.

This section explores the increasing commonality of a public dialogue that functions as a foundation for personal expression and moral judgment, often referred to as "authenticity in political discourse." Ghosh contends that a deadlock has surfaced in public discourse, with a 'deep state' consisting of closely knit corporate and governmental institutions firmly holding the mechanisms of control.

Other Perspectives

• The concept of the Anthropocene, while highlighting interconnectedness, does not necessarily negate the existence or importance of independent individuals; rather, it could be argued that individual actions and choices are part of the larger systems and can have significant impacts on them.
• Political ideology grounded in individualism does not necessarily preclude the ability to think collectively or to envision multiple futures; it can also provide a framework for personal responsibility and agency in addressing climate issues.
• Individualism can empower people to speak out against the status quo, which is essential for social change and addressing systemic issues that a collective mindset may overlook or be complicit in perpetuating.
• The emphasis on authenticity could lead to an over-personalization of politics, where the character of the politician becomes more important than the policies they represent, potentially distracting from substantive issues.
• Power is not solely held by a 'deep state' but is distributed across various actors, including civil society, media, and international organizations, which can influence and sometimes counterbalance corporate and governmental power.

The imperative for unprecedented political cooperation that crosses international borders and links various historical periods stems from the extensive impact of climate change that spans the globe and affects multiple generations.

Amitav Ghosh argues that the global nature of climate change challenges the prevailing notion of the nation-state as the principal entity in political matters. He suggests that the current crisis is indifferent to national boundaries, making them inconsequential. The need for intergenerational responsibility further complicates the picture, requiring a long-term perspective that transcends the short-term considerations of electoral politics.

This section of the text highlights the shortcomings of current international institutions, like the United Nations, when it comes to addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by climate change. The core tenets upon which these institutions stand are rooted in the concept of national sovereignty, which undermines their ability to tackle challenges that necessitate a unified international response. The author suggests creating administrative frameworks that transcend international boundaries and incorporate a dedication to the prosperity of upcoming generations as a means to effectively tackle the climate emergency.

Context

• Addressing climate change effectively requires sharing technology and scientific research across borders, which can be complicated by national security concerns and intellectual property rights upheld by nation-states.
• The idea raises ethical questions about the rights of those not yet born and the moral duty of current generations to prevent harm to future inhabitants of the planet. It challenges traditional views of justice and equity.
• The UN's efforts often struggle to balance between adaptation (adjusting to climate impacts) and mitigation (reducing emissions), with varying priorities among member states complicating unified strategies.
• Sovereign states have their own legal systems and political structures, which can create barriers to implementing international agreements uniformly, leading to disparities in enforcement and effectiveness.
• Effective frameworks would leverage technology for real-time data sharing and monitoring, enabling countries to respond more swiftly and collaboratively to environmental changes and disasters.
• Issues such as deforestation, desertification, and biodiversity loss often span multiple countries. Collaborative efforts are necessary to address these challenges effectively and ensure environmental sustainability.
• Past social and environmental movements provide lessons on mobilization and advocacy, crucial for current climate action efforts.
• As climate change forces migration and alters traditional ways of life, future generations will face challenges in maintaining cultural heritage and social stability.

The intensification of climate change exacerbates global inequalities, prompting intricate debates about fairness, responsibility, and compensation.

This section delves into the ethical and political challenges posed by the uneven distribution of climate change impacts and responsibilities. Ghosh argues that the escalating climate emergency exacerbates global disparities, necessitating a deeper commitment to equity and justice in addressing the problem.

Nations and societies that have thrived through a carbon-dependent economy must make greater sacrifices to address the environmental crisis, potentially involving a reallocation of resources and influence.

Ghosh emphasizes that wealthy nations must take on a greater share of the work necessary to mitigate the consequences of climate change, due to their substantial contributions to historical carbon emissions. He argues that this responsibility extends beyond just financial assistance, calling for a shift in power dynamics and a pledge to distribute wealth more equitably.

Amitav Ghosh criticizes the Western nations for focusing on safeguarding their own priorities and possessions, while neglecting the impact of climate change on less prepared communities. He exemplifies his argument by talking about people fleeing Syria, highlighting the hesitance of wealthy nations to open their doors to individuals displaced by a war in which these countries have been complicit.

Context

• Wealthy nations have historically contributed the most to carbon emissions since the Industrial Revolution, leading to their current economic prosperity. This historical context underlines their greater responsibility in addressing climate change.
• The economic systems that have enriched certain nations often rely on exploiting resources and labor from less developed countries, exacerbating global inequality.
• Climate change can exacerbate existing conflicts and lead to displacement, creating climate refugees who are forced to leave their homes due to environmental factors, a situation that wealthier nations are often reluctant to address comprehensively.
• There are international agreements, like the 1951 Refugee Convention, which outline the responsibilities of nations to protect refugees. However, adherence to these agreements can be inconsistent, with some countries opting for selective compliance.

To tackle the environmental emergency, it is imperative to reject the dangerous and dystopian strategy of strengthening national frontiers, restricting the movement of people, and prioritizing the needs of individual nations.

This part of the text delves into the ways in which the upper echelons of societies, including those in India, are increasingly adopting tactics that subtly diminish the importance of political actions. This strategy depends on the resilience of underprivileged groups to withstand the consequences of global warming, all the while accommodating the opulent ways of living of a select elite. Ghosh acknowledges the doubts about his approach while also questioning the effectiveness of other ethical strategies given the entrenched inequalities in the global system.

Ghosh emphasizes the need to look beyond personal and state priorities in addressing the environmental emergency. He contends that the crisis necessitates a significant transformation in our moral principles and the way we manage our collective affairs, emphasizing the importance of collaborative action, the striving for global equity, and the recognition of our intrinsic connection to the vast network of nature. He is optimistic that the growing engagement of faith-based groups, due to their capacity for rallying individuals and upholding steady viewpoints, might be pivotal in overcoming the existing political impasse.

Other Perspectives

• In some cases, national strategies may be more aligned with the public's preferences, leading to greater public support and more sustainable long-term policies.
• Some may argue that the tactics adopted by the upper echelons are not to diminish the importance of political action but to balance it with other approaches, such as technological innovation or market-based solutions to climate change.
• Some underprivileged communities have shown remarkable resilience and innovation in the face of environmental challenges, developing unique solutions that have informed broader climate adaptation strategies.
• Ethical strategies could be seen as complementary to other forms of action, such as legal and economic measures, rather than being ineffective on their own.
• National priorities can sometimes align with global environmental goals, and focusing on state-level initiatives can be a pragmatic step towards larger change.
• Incremental policy changes and market-based solutions could be effective in mitigating environmental issues without the need for a radical shift in moral principles.
• Recognizing our connection to nature, while philosophically sound, may not translate into effective policy without concrete economic incentives and regulatory frameworks to guide behavior.
• The engagement of faith-based groups could inadvertently prioritize certain moral perspectives over others, which might not be inclusive of the diverse beliefs within a pluralistic society.