PDF Summary:The Big Con, by Mariana Mazzucato and Rosie Collington

In The Big Con, Mariana Mazzucato and Rosie Collington scrutinize the unchecked influence and questionable practices of consulting firms in the global economy. The authors dissect how these firms have amassed substantial profits through outsized government contracts and clandestine operations, often at the expense of their clients' core competencies and democratic transparency.

Mazzucato and Collington reveal the troubling extent to which consultancies have embedded themselves in vital sectors like healthcare, defense, and public policy. They illustrate how these firms prioritize short-term profits over societal interests, fostering dependence while undermining clients' long-term institutional knowledge. The book spotlights consulting's at-times dubious role in major events like the COVID-19 pandemic response and climate change initiatives.

(continued)...

• The concept of limited liability is often accompanied by regulatory frameworks and corporate governance standards that aim to protect against the misuse of this protection and to ensure that companies operate in a responsible manner.
• The assumption that stock-based compensation leads to short-termism may not account for the complex motivations and decision-making processes of corporate managers and executives, which can also be influenced by personal ethics, company culture, and industry standards.
• The diversification of investment portfolios for shareholders can mitigate the impact of risks associated with any single company, suggesting that the risk transfer might not be as significant for well-diversified shareholders.
• Acquiring smaller firms does not always guarantee a broadening of expertise, as the integration of different corporate cultures and systems can lead to a loss of the specialized knowledge that made the smaller firms valuable in the first place.
• Cross-selling as a result of acquisitions can be seen as adding value for clients if it means they have access to more services and solutions that are seamlessly integrated, potentially leading to better strategic outcomes.

Consultancies leverage their privileged entry and confidential insights to gain financial benefits through governmental affiliations.

The book explores the murky operations of consultants, questioning whether their substantial fees are warranted by genuine knowledge sharing or improvements in productivity. Mazzucato and Collington argue that consultancies have mastered the art of presenting an illusion of value, as opposed to providing significant authentic value, likening this to a cunning ploy that extracts undue profits from their clients. They emphasize the importance of individual networks and the tradition of handpicking elite candidates from renowned schools, which frequently results in appointments within powerful sectors of government and industry, thus building trust and ensuring privileged access to serve an elite clientele, including various governmental and global organizations. They argue that advisory firms leverage insider knowledge and influence over decision-making processes to amass earnings that exceed the genuine worth produced.

The writers also emphasize the establishment of sophisticated mechanisms for internal knowledge management to collect and apply lessons from previous contracts. While these frequently cited cases within the industry may spark customer curiosity, Mazzucato and Collington argue that this method tends to result in superficial assessments, focusing on individual examples rather than creating tailored solutions that meet the specific needs of customers.

Practical Tips

• Evaluate the real impact of past consultancy by reviewing previous projects and identifying measurable outcomes versus stated goals. Look at the reports or results from past consultants and compare them with the objectives they were hired to achieve. If the outcomes are vague or the improvements are not quantifiable, consider this a red flag for future consultancy engagements.
• Start a blog or podcast discussing the impact of elite networks on industry and government, focusing on interviews with professionals from these sectors. This can serve as a platform to connect with and learn from individuals who have navigated these networks. By providing valuable content, you may attract the attention of elite professionals and potentially receive invitations to events or collaborations.
• Start a reflection routine where you spend 10 minutes at the end of each week to review what you've learned. Use a simple journal or a digital app to record your thoughts. Reflect on the successes and challenges of the week, and consider how the insights gained could be applied to similar situations in the future. This practice will help you internalize your experiences and make better-informed choices.
• Engage in reverse brainstorming sessions where you identify potential pitfalls of widely accepted industry practices. This can help you develop a more critical eye when assessing case studies. For example, if a certain technology is popular in your field, think about scenarios where it might fail or not be the best option, and what alternatives could be more effective in those situations.

Democratic oversight is undermined by the lack of transparency in agreements and the common practice of individuals transitioning between governmental positions and advisory service companies, which are influenced by entrenched interests.

The book reveals how the consulting industry has subtly eroded the foundations of democratic accountability, often eluding the watchful eye of the public. Mazzucato and Collington thoroughly investigate how consulting firms exploit the lack of transparency in contract dealings and the intricate nature of lawmaking to sway legislation and regulatory measures to benefit their clientele. They highlight the common practice of individuals transitioning between advisory positions and governmental appointments.

Criticism is frequently directed at consultancy contracts due to their lack of transparency, the manner in which they engage with clients, and the level of information shared with individuals holding political or regulatory power.

The authors illuminate the intricate connections that consultancy firms have with government entities. Mazzucato and Collington emphasize the dangers of powerful, clandestine corporate entities that influence governmental actions, noting that frequently, neither taxpayers nor employees are adequately apprised of the level of involvement of consultancy companies in governmental matters or the scale of their financial remuneration. They scrutinize the disputes linked to the involvement of McKinsey in restructuring Puerto Rico's finances. After a meticulous vetting process, the Oversight Board selected McKinsey to serve as the "Strategic Consultant," thereby granting its consultants significant influence over various aspects of the economic restructuring, which included the recommendation to repeal labor laws deemed too advantageous for workers.

Following inquiries by The New York Times, it was revealed that there might be a conflict of interest since entities associated with McKinsey, which held investments in Puerto Rican bonds, could benefit from the debt restructuring they were consulting on for the government. The foundational rules governing the Oversight Board were intentionally designed to hinder the scrutiny of conflicts of interest, the authors contend.

Practical Tips

• Develop a habit of asking for a 'plain language summary' with every consultancy contract you encounter. This means requesting a document that explains the contract's terms in simple, straightforward language. It's a proactive step to ensure you understand all aspects of the agreement and can help identify any areas where transparency is lacking.
• Volunteer with a local non-profit organization that focuses on government transparency and accountability. Offer to help with tasks such as monitoring local government meetings, reviewing public records for consultancy firm involvement, or assisting in community outreach programs. This hands-on experience will give you a better understanding of the consultancy-government dynamic and how it affects your community.
• You can start a blog to discuss and analyze the impact of consultancy firms on government policy, providing a platform for public awareness and debate. By doing this, you create a space for citizens to become more informed about the influence of consultancy on governance. For example, after a major policy announcement, you could write a post examining the potential involvement of consultancy firms in shaping that policy.
• Consider creating an online course or guide based on your expertise or hobby that provides valuable insights, mirroring the consultancy model of sharing specialized knowledge for compensation. If you're an avid gardener, you could create a downloadable guide on urban gardening for beginners and sell it through social media or a personal blog.
• Develop a personal financial restructuring plan by identifying areas where you can reduce expenses or renegotiate terms. For instance, if you have credit card debt, you could research and compare balance transfer offers to lower your interest rates. Then, create a step-by-step action plan to pay down your debt more efficiently, such as using the debt snowball or avalanche method.
• Develop a critical eye for evaluating economic advice by comparing recommendations from different sources on a specific issue. For instance, if a consulting firm suggests a particular economic policy, look for alternative perspectives from academic economists, local business owners, and financial journalists. This will help you understand the range of opinions and potential biases in economic advice.
• Create a personal contingency plan for how you would adapt if certain worker protections were repealed. Consider how you would negotiate your work conditions, manage your time, or ensure job security. This proactive approach prepares you for potential changes in the labor market and empowers you to take control of your work situation.
• Encourage open conversations about ethical dilemmas in your workplace by initiating discussions or suggesting agenda items for team meetings. If you're part of a team that makes decisions on partnerships or hires external consultants, propose a regular ethics check-in where potential conflicts of interest are reviewed and addressed. This doesn't require specialized skills, just a commitment to ethical practices and the courage to raise potentially sensitive issues.
• Create a personal financial transparency report by documenting where your money is invested, including any bonds or stocks, and share this with a trusted friend or advisor for accountability. This could involve listing out your investments and noting any potential conflicts of interest or ethical concerns, similar to how companies disclose their financial interests.
• Develop a habit of asking "Why?" five times when faced with information that seems biased or one-sided. This technique, rooted in the principles of root cause analysis, can help you uncover underlying conflicts of interest that might not be immediately apparent. For example, if a friend recommends a particular service, ask why they chose it, why they think it's the best, and continue probing until you understand whether there's a conflict of interest, such as a referral bonus they might receive.

Consultancies use their expertise and influence to shape regulations and policies that benefit their corporate clients, often to the detriment of the general population's interests.

Mazzucato and Collington criticize the tactics used by the four major accounting firms, which use their close connections with policymakers and their deep understanding of laws to assist their business clients in circumventing tax obligations. The authors bolster their argument by examining a 2013 UK parliamentary inquiry that delved into the methods by which the four major accounting firms leveraged their knowledge of tax laws to advise clients on reducing their tax obligations.

Mazzucato and Collington explore how modern politicians can be influenced by engaging in activities that, while legal, might create situations where their private interests conflict with their duties to the public. The book reveals a situation in the UK where the finance director of the Labour Party, seconded from KPMG, managed the party's fiscal affairs at a time when the firm was offering free accounting services. Drawing on data that connects these actions to an increase in specific questions from legislators, they highlight that these understated forms of influence are frequently more harmful than overt corruption.

Other Perspectives

• The influence of consultancies on regulations and policies is subject to checks and balances, including public consultations, legislative oversight, and the democratic process, which can mitigate potential conflicts of interest.
• It could be argued that the expertise of accounting firms in tax matters can also be used to advise on policy reforms and improve the tax system for the benefit of all stakeholders, not just corporate clients.
• The assumption that influence is inherently detrimental overlooks the possibility that corporate interests might align with public interests in certain cases, and that influence can be exerted in a way that is beneficial for society as a whole.
• The finance director's role from KPMG could be seen as a form of pro bono work, which is a common practice in various industries, including law and consultancy, aimed at providing expertise to organizations that may otherwise not afford it.
• Subtle forms of influence may not always be more harmful than overt corruption, as overt corruption can lead to more immediate and tangible damage to institutions and public trust.

Organizations are experiencing a decline in specialized knowledge and abilities, which, when combined with the divergent objectives of consulting firms and the well-being of society

The book's final remarks sharply criticize how organizations often surrender their independence and become overly dependent on external consulting firms. Mazzucato and Collington argue that by outsourcing core functions, organizations lose vital hands-on experience, a loss that not only undermines their current capabilities but also diminishes their capacity for innovation and advancement over time. The book explores the conflict between the consulting industry's pursuit of profit and the welfare of the public.

Outsourcing critical functions to consulting firms diminishes the internal proficiency and skill sets of entities within the public and private realms.

The authors thoroughly examine the detrimental effects that occur as a result of outsourcing, which results in a significant loss of specialized knowledge. Mazzucato and Collington argue that depending excessively on consultancies to provide rapid solutions and standardized strategies undermines the gradual, cooperative development of knowledge that is essential for organizations to develop their own abilities and expertise. The assessment of consulting agreements often emphasizes a straightforward cost-benefit analysis, while overlooking the critical need to nurture skill and competency growth within the client's organization, which exacerbates the problem.

Mazzucato and Collington delve into this phenomenon through a thorough analysis of the initiative surrounding Sweden's Nya Karolinska Solna hospital. The Stockholm County Assembly's decision to use a public-private partnership (PPP) model for the project, endorsed by consultancies PwC and Ernst & Young, resulted in soaring costs, poor execution, and significant reliance on outside consultants for the hospital's management and operations. The authors highlight the chaos and substantial financial extravagance that ensued after NKS hired Boston Consulting Group (BCG) to implement a disputed strategy centered on healthcare prioritization according to its value. The authors argue that reliance on consulting firms not only increased costs but also wasted the critical knowledge of medical professionals and researchers, thereby hindering the hospital's ability to learn and innovate internally.

Organizations may struggle to adapt and remain relevant if they lose their "institutional memory" and become excessively reliant on the expertise provided by outside advisors.

In their analysis, Mazzucato and Collington build on previous research into organizational learning, emphasizing the importance of developing flexible skills that allow entities to respond to changes emanating from the political sphere. The authors argue that the knowledge and skills developed inside corporations are often overlooked in favor of solutions driven by market forces. The authors advocate for invigorating the public sector by enhancing its capabilities and assets, referencing the creation of the National Health Service as a prime example of such success.

Mazzucato and Collington argue that agreements with consultants often fail to recognize the profound knowledge and skills that exist within an organization. The authors illustrate that since the 1990s, there has been a noticeable decline in the capability of government agencies to handle IT across various countries, which has occurred simultaneously with persistent initiatives to digitize and delegate public sector tasks to external entities. The study cited suggests that consultants often have difficulty transferring expertise to their clients, underscoring the inherent clash stemming from the consultancy industry's emphasis on profit, which is frequently misaligned with the long-term objectives of their client companies and the well-being of society. The authors contend that the quick adoption and subsequent abandonment of the newest management fads hampers the establishment of robust learning strategies, as it overlooks the importance of thoroughly understanding and addressing an organization's unique needs and capabilities.

Consultancy agencies frequently advocate for a short-term, results-oriented approach that may impede the development of genuine, enduring expertise among the organizations they support.

Mazzucato and Collington emphasize the importance for entities to integrate and utilize external insights, offering a unique viewpoint on the role of consulting firms within the framework of the economy. The authors argue that the successful utilization of vital information depends on the readiness of the contracting company to share its unique insights and the government's capacity to recognize and utilize that expertise. Countries such as India, Vietnam, and Rwanda, which learned from previous experiences and shifted their internal capacities, stand in stark contrast to nations that outsourced their pandemic response to outside consulting firms.

The authors argue that while consultancy firms may play a role in fostering educational development, their primary impact is detrimental, encouraging a mindset focused on short-term exchanges that hinders the sustained development of genuine skills and understanding. The deterioration of crucial public services such as healthcare, schooling, and community support, which the populace must bear, poses a substantial obstacle for democratic countries, particularly when advisors profit from these shortcomings.

Other Perspectives

• A short-term, results-oriented approach can be beneficial for organizations needing immediate solutions or for those in crisis management situations where quick results are essential for survival.
• External insights, though valuable, might not always align with the unique culture, values, or strategic objectives of an organization, leading to a mismatch in advice and implementation.
• The focus on the contracting company's readiness to share may underestimate the need for a conducive environment that encourages open communication and trust between the consultancy and the contracting company.
• The focus on the government's capacity to utilize expertise does not address the potential for conflicts of interest or ethical concerns that may arise when governments become too closely aligned with certain experts or consultancies.
• The statement does not address the quality of the previous experiences or whether the lessons learned were positive or negative, which can significantly affect the outcome of the capacity shifts.
• The use of consulting firms can be a strategic decision to supplement existing capabilities and allow countries to focus their internal resources on other critical areas of pandemic management.
• Consultants can act as catalysts for change, introducing new ideas and perspectives that can lead to innovation and improvement in educational practices within organizations.
• Some consultancy agencies specialize in capacity building and organizational development, which are directly aimed at fostering long-term skills and expertise within the organizations they support.
• The measurement of deterioration is often complex and multifaceted, and some metrics may show improvements in areas like accessibility, even if other aspects seem to be declining.
• In some cases, the perceived deterioration of services may lead to increased investment and reform, ultimately resulting in improved services in the long term.
• Profit made by advisors could be a byproduct of their expertise and the value they add, rather than an exploitation of the system's weaknesses.
• Democratic countries have the ability to regulate and set standards for consultancy practices, potentially minimizing any negative impacts.

The quest for financial gain in the consulting sector often clashes with the interests of the broader population.

Mazzucato and Collington emphasize the inherent conflict between the relentless pursuit of profit and broader social benefits, especially in relation to the advisory industry. The authors contend that the methods employed by consulting firms are at odds with the goal of establishing societies that are equitable and sustainable.

Consulting firms frequently place the interests of their highest-paying clients above the broader welfare of society.

The book highlights the tension that arises when consulting firms prioritize the needs of their most affluent clients, such as large corporations and wealthy individuals, over the well-being of the general population. The book discloses how a firm's focus on maximizing earnings can result in strategies detrimental to its workforce, such as pushing for reductions in personnel and structural alterations, weakening the position and negotiating power of employees, leading to lower salaries and often putting workers in precarious employment conditions. The book outlines various instances where consultancies have engaged in collective bargaining negotiations, advocating for approaches that could potentially undermine employee welfare and diminish the safeguards put in place for their advantage.

Furthermore, the authors scrutinize how the consulting sector has grown increasingly enmeshed with the processes that enable capital to flow out of Africa. Consultancies serve a twofold purpose, providing their expert insights to public bodies and private entities involved in secret monetary transactions within non-transparent fiscal realms, thus gaining financially from and contributing to the perpetuation of a lack of regulation and transparency in these areas, a dynamic that exacerbates poverty, undermines democratic institutions, and stalls economic development across the area.

Consulting firms have influenced policy responses to critical matters, including the environmental crisis, to protect their lucrative corporate plans.

The writers end their discussion by underscoring the vital necessity of reshaping our approach to constructing economies that genuinely serve their intended function. Recognizing the government's part in generating value is essential, as is embracing a broad view of the diverse societal sectors that contribute to this value, such as businesses, non-profit organizations, and labor unions. The authors propose a significant transformation in the consulting environment, recommending that individuals possessing authentic expertise and skill offer straightforward advice while serving in an assisting capacity instead of assuming control from a central role.

The authors argue that it is vital for government institutions to be developed in such a way that they can correct market failures and actively shape these markets to align with the broader goals of society. They underscore the importance of reinvigorating the visionary goals and progressive tactics embodied by entities like the UK's public healthcare system, underscoring the criticality of increasing investment in the technological backbone of public services around the world. Only then, Mazzucato and Collington argue, will our organizations—and our societies—be able to rise to the biggest challenges that lie ahead.

Other Perspectives

• The relationship between consulting firms and societal welfare is not necessarily zero-sum; strategies that benefit high-paying clients can also lead to innovations, efficiencies, and economic growth that have positive ripple effects on society.
• Some strategies that appear detrimental in the short term may be part of a larger plan to pivot the company towards new markets or products, which could lead to long-term benefits for both the company and its employees.
• Consultancies may argue that their role in collective bargaining is to provide data-driven insights and expertise to optimize the financial health of the organization, which can ultimately benefit all stakeholders, including employees.
• It can be argued that the outflow of capital is a complex issue influenced by a multitude of factors, including but not limited to the activities of consulting firms, such as the macroeconomic policies of African nations, global economic trends, and the actions of other international actors.
• It might be argued that the causality implied between consultancies' actions and the exacerbation of poverty and undermining of democratic institutions is too simplistic and does not take into account the complex interplay of multiple factors that affect these issues.
• The assertion that consulting firms prioritize corporate interests in environmental policy may not account for the diversity within the consulting industry, including firms that specialize in environmental and social governance consulting.
• There is a possibility that the call to reshape economies is based on an idealistic view of government capabilities, and that governments may lack the necessary competence, information, or resources to effectively manage and shape markets.
• Recognizing diverse societal sectors is important, but prioritizing government involvement may inadvertently diminish the role and potential contributions of the private sector, which can be a significant driver of innovation and economic growth.
• The proposal for consultants to offer straightforward advice without assuming control may not recognize the complexity of certain problems that require an integrated approach to both strategy formulation and execution.
• There is a risk of regulatory capture, where government agencies tasked with regulating industries end up being influenced by the very firms they are supposed to regulate, leading to decisions that may not align with the broader societal goals.
• The effectiveness of technological investments is contingent on the existing infrastructure, which may be lacking in some areas, reducing the potential impact of such investments.
• The UK's public healthcare system, while often cited as a successful model, faces its own set of challenges, such as funding constraints, long waiting times, and workforce pressures, which may limit its applicability as a universal model for other organizations and societies.