PDF Summary:The Age of Grievance, by Frank Bruni

In The Age of Grievance, Frank Bruni explores the deep rift within American society, marked by widespread feelings of discontent, outrage, and bitterness. This perceived state of grievance is fueled by the growing wealth gap, diminished chances for upward mobility, and the influence of social media, which amplifies emotions and provides an echo chamber for dissatisfaction.

Bruni examines how political operatives and media personalities capitalize on these sentiments, contributing to a divisive and combative atmosphere that erodes faith in democratic institutions, promotes a willingness to accept violence as a means to ends, and diminishes civil discourse. He also offers insights into potential remedies, advocating reforms to voting processes, reviving unbiased journalism, and emphasizing civic education as a means of fostering greater societal unity.

(continued)...

News organizations have altered their emphasis, giving more weight to editorial content and analysis, thereby creating a setting that recognizes and amplifies grievances.

The author observes a troubling trend in established news outlets, where subjective analysis and personal viewpoints are increasingly overshadowing impartial journalism, thereby endorsing and intensifying feelings of resentment and complaint. In the intensely competitive media landscape, the race to capture audience attention and digital interaction has led news organizations to prioritize sensational viewpoints and heightened narratives, frequently sacrificing comprehensive, unbiased, and meticulous coverage.

Bruni narrates an experience where his impartial stance on a political issue resulted in being left out of a TV panel discussion, as it did not conform to the anticipated perspective. Frank Bruni observes that the relentless pursuit of notoriety has compromised ethical standards in journalism, resulting in a rise of sensational headlines, overstated language, and a perpetual focus on discord, which in turn magnifies the disputes and bitterness that they claim to report.

The architecture of online platforms' algorithms is intentionally crafted to amplify content that triggers intense emotional reactions, particularly those that provoke feelings of resentment and bitterness, which in turn rapidly spreads dissatisfaction.

Social media platforms, according to Bruni, play a crucial role in amplifying dissatisfaction by promoting content that elicits strong emotional responses, particularly those that incite anger and resentment, due to their algorithms designed to boost user engagement. He references studies by Max Fisher, author of "The Chaos Machine," which demonstrate that social media networks are engineered to emphasize material that activates our innate social reactions rather than our capacity for thoughtful deliberation, thus promoting the dissemination of false information and nudging people toward more radical perspectives. The constant exposure to more provocative content intensifies users' preexisting prejudices and solidifies their feelings of resentment.

He argues that the way social media platforms are designed to reward content that sparks outrage and disapproval promotes the exhibition of dissatisfaction. People often embrace extreme opinions and intensify their criticisms as they seek validation through social media, leading to the degradation of public discourse and an increase in social fragmentation.

Political groups have grown increasingly divided, portraying one another as the fundamental cause of the nation's problems and leveraging grievances to advance their political objectives.

Bruni illustrates how grievances have become a crucial factor in the landscape of party politics, serving as a tool for all political groups to galvanize their base and cast their opponents in a negative light. He argues that this division goes beyond simple differences in policy, reshaping the very perception of truth and resulting in a scenario where opposing groups view each other not just as incorrect, but as inherently malicious and dangerous.

Individuals in politics and media who intentionally provoke dread and hostility towards rival groups are culpable for portraying these entities as substantial menaces to the American way of life, framing each political discord as a crisis of survival. Bruni, using research from the field of political studies, describes the prevailing political climate as one in which people predominantly define their political selves through what they stand against rather than what they support, resulting in a perpetual cycle of dissatisfaction.

Other Perspectives

• Social media can also foster positive engagement and activism, uniting like-minded individuals to work towards common goals and social change.
• Not all biased news outlets contribute to societal discord; some may offer alternative perspectives that challenge mainstream narratives and contribute to a more diverse media landscape.
• Editorial content and analysis can provide valuable insights and depth to news reporting, helping audiences understand complex issues.
• Subjective analysis in journalism can be balanced with fact-checking and multiple sources to maintain integrity while offering interpretive viewpoints.
• Ethical journalism still exists, and many news organizations strive to maintain high standards despite the pressures of sensationalism.
• Algorithms on online platforms can be designed to promote a diversity of content, not just content that triggers emotional reactions.
• Social media platforms have the potential to correct misinformation and promote informed discussions through community guidelines and fact-checking initiatives.
• Political groups sometimes engage in bipartisan efforts and find common ground on certain issues, which can reduce division and foster collaboration.
• The perception of truth in politics can be multifaceted, and not all political discourse is defined by opposition or dissatisfaction.
• Political and media figures can use their platforms to promote unity and understanding, highlighting shared values and goals across different groups.

Resentment undermines the very foundations of democratic systems.

Some individuals and collectives now view the democratic system with skepticism, believing it to be prejudiced and not representative of their concerns.

Bruni argues that the unchecked escalation of grievances undermines trust in the foundations of democracy and weakens belief in the democratic process as a whole. Individuals feeling persistently marginalized, disregarded, or misled might grow reluctant to engage in vital democratic processes and could gravitate towards authoritarian solutions promising swift, decisive, and punitive change.

The belief that the system is skewed in favor of the elite has intensified due to the strategic redrawing of voting districts and the influence of monetary donations in the political sphere.

Bruni argues that the deliberate shaping of voting districts to guarantee predetermined results, along with the substantial influence of monetary donations, stokes political dissatisfaction. In his book, Bruni examines cases like those in North Carolina, his birthplace, where legislative Republicans have intentionally drawn districts to ensure an outsized sway in the U.S. House of Representatives, which contradicts the state's diverse political nature, resulting in a series of legal challenges, one of which was brought forth by the Democratic governor of North Carolina. Bruni conveys his apprehension that the tactics employed by various political factions contribute to the perception of a rigged system, undermining confidence in fair representation and heightening doubts about the integrity of the democratic process.

The vast sums of money poured into political campaigns by wealthy donors and special interests further exacerbate this perception, Bruni argues. Bruni argues that such contributions result in a situation where politicians seem to owe more to their monetary backers than to the voters they serve. Bruni observes that these situations exacerbate feelings of powerlessness and resentment, particularly among those who feel ignored or neglected by those with power.

Public participation has waned as individuals sense that their issues and viewpoints are ignored and left unaddressed.

Bruni suggests that widespread discontent has resulted in diminished involvement in communal activities, which in turn hinders people from taking part in actions that benefit the public domain. As individuals frequently feel overlooked, underappreciated, and misled by those in authority, their propensity to participate in essential dialogues that are crucial for a thriving democratic society wanes. Bruni warns that this retreat could substantially weaken trust in democratic structures, potentially leading to the emergence of extremist groups that challenge democratic principles.

He observes an increasing feeling of alienation, marked by a decrease in voter turnout, particularly in primary elections where more extreme candidates often prevail; a diminishing trust in media sources; and a reduced participation in community organizations and civic events. Bruni conveys his apprehension that shunning participation in community affairs leads to a harmful loop that impedes advancements in critical matters and intensifies existing complaints.

The widespread escalation of deep-seated resentments has undermined essential democratic tenets, such as the observance of legal processes and the dedication to peaceful transfers of power.

The author conveys a profound unease regarding the way resentment erodes the foundations of democracy, highlighting a waning reverence for the judicial system and the erosion of the peaceful handover of authority in the United States, which once served as an exemplar to other countries, signifying its unique character, and underpinning its unmatched sway in promoting and maintaining democratic institutions globally.

Frank Bruni highlights the former leader's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 Election and the events of January 6th as the most egregious examples of this deterioration. In this climate, facts and evidence are often disregarded when they conflict with a person's preferred storyline. They create a dangerous standard implying that achieving political objectives can justify any degree of hostility or dishonesty.

He also expresses concern about the increasing tendency within the ranks of the Republican Party to lean toward authoritarian governance, highlighted by figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has openly contemplated harsh retaliation against those she opposes politically. Bruni argues that a political faction, once a staunch ally of traditional institutions and the tenets of democracy, now alarmingly advocates for behaviors that undermine trust in governmental bodies and legitimize political violence as a viable option.

Context

• Gerrymandering is the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to benefit a particular party or group by diluting or concentrating voters strategically. It can involve splitting opposition supporters across multiple districts (cracking) or concentrating them in one district (packing). Gerrymandering is often criticized for distorting the democratic process by allowing politicians to choose their voters instead of the other way around. The term originates from a combination of the name Elbridge Gerry and the shape of a salamander-like district he created in 1812.
• Marjorie Taylor Greene is an American far-right politician known for promoting conspiracy theories and controversial views. She has been a U.S. representative for Georgia's 14th congressional district since 2021 and has been associated with promoting extremist ideologies and false claims. Greene has been a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump and has been involved in efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
• On January 6th, 2021, a violent insurrection took place at the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C. Supporters of then-President Donald Trump breached the Capitol building in an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The event led to multiple injuries, deaths, and significant damage to the Capitol complex. It resulted in the certification of Joe Biden as the 46th President of the United States.
• The 2020 Election results challenge referred to attempts by some individuals, including former President Donald Trump, to contest the outcome of the presidential election, claiming widespread voter fraud and irregularities. These challenges culminated in the events of January 6th, 2021, when a violent mob stormed the U.S. Capitol in an effort to disrupt the certification of the electoral college results. The challenges and subsequent events sparked significant controversy and debate about the integrity of the election process and the peaceful transfer of power in the United States.
• Authoritarian governance is a system where power is concentrated in the hands of a single leader or a small group, limiting the freedoms and rights of individuals. This form of governance often suppresses political opposition, restricts freedom of speech, and controls various aspects of society. It can lead to a lack of accountability, transparency, and checks and balances in decision-making processes. Authoritarian leaders typically prioritize control and order over democratic principles and individual liberties.
• Traditional institutions in the context of democracy typically refer to long-standing organizations or structures within a society that play essential roles in upholding democratic principles and processes. Tenets of democracy are the fundamental beliefs or principles that form the foundation of a democratic system, such as the rule of law, free and fair elections, protection of individual rights, and the separation of powers among branches of government. These traditional institutions and democratic tenets are crucial for maintaining the integrity and functionality of a democratic society.
• Political violence as a viable option refers to situations where individuals or groups consider using force or aggression to achieve their political goals. This can range from protests turning violent to organized acts of terrorism. The idea that political violence is a viable option is concerning as it undermines the principles of democracy and can lead to instability and harm within a society. It signifies a departure from peaceful and lawful means of political expression and can have far-reaching negative consequences.

Investigating methods to alleviate discord and promote greater unity within the community.

Addressing grievances requires a multifaceted approach that encompasses reforming democratic institutions, reshaping media and social networking practices, and emphasizing the enhancement of civic engagement and understanding.

The author recognizes the peril that resentment poses to the democratic framework of the United States, yet they maintain a sense of optimism. The publication delves deeper than simply conveying sadness and meticulously cataloging complaints. The book advocates for proactive steps to alleviate the pervasive sense of dissatisfaction and foster greater social cohesion. Efforts to resolve these issues must begin by actively opposing the elements that amplify grievances, including initiating reforms to rectify systemic injustices, then altering media and social media norms that favor productive conversations instead of indignation, and finally, advocating for a nationwide emphasis on deepening our understanding of how a democracy functions and fostering a more unified national ethos.

The sway of resentment-fueled partisanship could be lessened by altering electoral processes, such as establishing nonpartisan redistricting, embracing open primaries, and instituting a system where voters prioritize candidates in order of preference.

Addressing the pervasive sense of discontent requires a fundamental overhaul of the voting mechanisms that encourage divisive partisan behavior. The writer advocates for the establishment of electoral districts that are designed without bias, thereby reducing the incentive for legislators to gerrymander for personal political advantage. He argues that the formation of impartial committees to draw fair congressional districts would result in the nomination of candidates with more moderate views, encourage more competitive elections, and enhance responsibility towards a broader range of voters.

Bruni suggests implementing open or jungle primaries to reduce the influence that partisan activists often have in closed primaries, which usually results in the selection of candidates with more extreme positions. He argues that opening up the voting process to include those without party affiliations, or creating a single primary where candidates from every party vie simultaneously, would push politicians to appeal to a wider spectrum of political beliefs, prompting them to take on more moderate positions and to reduce the aggressiveness in their rhetoric.

Bruni proposes the adoption of a voting mechanism that ranks candidates in accordance with the choices specified by voters. This voting system motivates contenders to broaden their appeal across a more diverse range of voters, as the winner is decided not only by the first choices but also by the additional preferences indicated by the electorate. Bruni notes that the implementation of ranked-choice voting across numerous cities and states has led to positive results, promoting the rise of more moderate candidates and diminishing the divide in political ideology.

Media outlets and digital discussion platforms should prioritize accurate reporting, maintain neutrality, and encourage a diversity of perspectives instead of highlighting grievances.

Bruni calls for a reinvigorated commitment to accuracy and neutrality among media organizations. Frank Bruni acknowledges his and his colleagues' contribution to creating an environment saturated with dissatisfaction and complaints by prioritizing provocative opinions and language over unbiased journalism. He championed the resurgence of journalistic standards that prioritize verification of facts, neutrality, and nuance, which in turn reduces the undue emphasis on outrage and fosters more productive dialogues among the populace.

He also champions a shift in the functional mechanisms of social media platforms, advocating for enhanced transparency in algorithmic processes and the creation of stricter regulations to hold these platforms accountable for spreading misinformation. Bruni suggests that businesses in the social media sector ought to encourage substantive conversations and interactions instead of simply producing material that incites discord. He is of the opinion that by altering algorithms to highlight content that garners positive reactions and satisfaction from a wide-ranging audience, we can transform the digital social environment into a realm more conducive to nurturing connections and discovering shared interests, rather than an environment that cultivates discontent and complaints.

Building a more robust base for comprehending civic issues and emphasizing shared civic values and a sense of unity across the nation could lead to the creation of a common goal, which might reduce the appeal of a political climate saturated with complaints and acrimony.

Bruni emphasizes the importance of improving civic education, recognizing that without the ability to comprehend the complexities of a diverse society, people are more vulnerable to the manipulative strategies of political groups that capitalize on discontent and complaints. Bruni champions a renewed emphasis on civic education, encompassing the comprehension of governmental functions and frameworks, as well as fostering a deep respect for shared civic values, encouraging unity across the nation, and underscoring the importance of participation in the democratic process.

Frank Bruni emphasizes the importance of a civics education that goes beyond simple rote learning, aiming to cultivate skills in critical thinking, evaluating media content, and maintaining respectful conversations with those holding differing views. Frank Bruni argues that fostering a shared sense of national purpose and a collective identity, anchored in the most admirable elements of America's history and fundamental values, can diminish the narratives of dissatisfaction and establish a stronger, more cohesive democratic society.

Other Perspectives

• Electoral reforms such as nonpartisan redistricting, open primaries, and ranked-choice voting, while potentially reducing partisanship, may not address underlying ideological divides and could inadvertently marginalize certain political groups or minority interests.
• The establishment of fair congressional districts, though aimed at reducing gerrymandering, could still be subject to manipulation and may not guarantee the election of more moderate candidates if the electorate itself is highly polarized.
• Open or jungle primaries might dilute the influence of political parties, potentially leading to a less structured political system and voter confusion due to an overwhelming number of candidates.
• Ranked-choice voting can be complex for voters to understand and might not always lead to more moderate candidates if strategic voting occurs or if there is a strong partisan divide.
• Media neutrality and a commitment to accurate reporting are ideal, but complete objectivity is difficult to achieve due to inherent biases in reporting and editorial choices, which can shape public perception even with factual reporting.
• Calls for enhanced transparency in social media algorithms and stricter regulations may conflict with free speech principles and could lead to censorship or the suppression of legitimate dissenting opinions.
• Improving civic education is important, but there is disagreement on what constitutes shared civic values and how to effectively teach critical thinking without imposing certain worldviews.
• Emphasizing a unified national ethos may overlook the value of diversity and the healthy expression of dissent, which are also fundamental to a democratic society.