PDF Summary:Taxes Have Consequences, by Arthur B. Laffer, Brian Domitrovic, and Jeane Cairns Sinquefield

Excessive tax rates can often be counterproductive, stifling economic growth and hindering government revenues. In the book Taxes Have Consequences, authors Arthur B. Laffer, Brian Domitrovic, and Jeane Cairns Sinquefield scrutinize the economic impacts of tax policy throughout US history. Their central thesis is that higher tax rates, particularly for top income brackets, tend to disincentivize productive economic activity, while lower tax rates promote investment and expansion.

The authors back their arguments with various historical case studies, illustrating how major tax cuts and tax hikes influenced economic outcomes in different eras, from the Roaring Twenties to the stagflation of the Seventies. They explore how tax policies shaped pivotal events like the Great Depression and World War II, while delving into the significance of factors such as marginal tax rates and the timing of tax changes. Throughout, the book underscores the delicate balance between tax rates and economic prosperity, advocating a reduced rate regime to unleash growth and expand public coffers.

(continued)...

• You can diversify your investment portfolio to include assets that historically perform well during inflation, such as precious metals or real estate. By doing so, you're not directly combating inflation, but you're protecting your personal finances from its effects. For example, if you typically invest in stocks, consider allocating a portion of your investments to commodities or property, which may appreciate or at least hold value if inflation rises.
• You can analyze your personal budget to identify areas where you might be more vulnerable to economic downturns, such as stagflation. By reviewing your monthly expenses, you can pinpoint non-essential items that you could cut back on or eliminate. For example, if you subscribe to multiple streaming services, consider reducing to just one to save money.

Taxation During Economic Downturns and Recoveries

This section delves into the specific impacts of tax policy during economic downturns and recoveries, focusing on the interplay between taxation, public spending, and economic performance.

Great Depression: Effect of Raised Taxes

This section examines the effect of increasing taxes in the Great Depression. The authors debunk the traditional notion that the Great Depression was a failure of capitalism and provide an alternative explanation, pointing to specific tax increases, such as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff and the tax hikes of the 1932 Revenue Act, as major factors in both initiating and sustaining the economic downturn.

How the 1930s Tax Hikes, Including the Smoot-Hawley Tariff and 1932 Revenue Act, Aggravated and Prolonged the Great Depression

Laffer, Domitrovic, and Sinquefield strongly disagree with the view that capitalism failed in the Great Depression. They argue that a major contributing factor to the economic crisis was a sequence of damaging tax increases implemented during the Hoover and Roosevelt administrations.

They point to the 1930 enactment of the Smoot-Hawley Act as the initial trigger for the economic collapse. This tariff, which was the most significant in U.S. history at that time, imposed steep duties on numerous imports, triggering retaliatory tariffs abroad and ultimately leading to the downfall of international trade. The authors argue that this sharp drop in trade deepened the recession and had a ripple effect throughout the U.S. economy.

Following the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, the 1932 Revenue Law further exacerbated the economic crisis. This Act, signed by Hoover, increased the highest income tax rate from 25% to a staggering 63% and raised other taxes. It was a desperate effort to balance federal finances during a period of rapidly declining revenues due to the depressed economy. The authors argue that this drastic rise in taxes was counterproductive, instead further stifling the economy and prolonging the Depression.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal finance blog or vlog documenting your journey through economic cycles, focusing on investment, saving, and spending strategies that align with capitalist principles. Share your experiences with budgeting and investing during different economic phases, which can serve as a practical case study for others interested in the resilience of capitalism.
• Use a global market simulator to experience the effects of import tariffs. Participating in an online simulation game like "Trade Tycoon" can give you a hands-on understanding of how imposing tariffs can affect a country's economy. You'll manage a virtual economy and see the real-time consequences of trade barriers on your simulated nation's prosperity.
• Purchase products from local small businesses that source materials domestically. This strategy supports your local economy and reduces the impact of international trade conflicts on your purchasing power. For instance, if you're in the market for new furniture, opt for a local craftsman who uses locally sourced wood rather than an importer who might be affected by tariffs.
• Create a simulation of your financial decisions using spreadsheet software to forecast their long-term impact. Similar to how economic models predict the impact of tax hikes, you can use a spreadsheet to model different financial scenarios, like taking on a new loan or investing in a business. This helps you visualize potential outcomes and make informed decisions.

High Taxes Stifled Enterprises and Prolonged the 1930s Crisis

Laffer, Domitrovic, and Sinquefield maintain that elevated taxes in the 1930s stifled economic activity, discouraged investment, and ultimately prolonged the Great Depression. They argue that the high top rates on marginal income, specifically, were particularly damaging as they directly discouraged those individuals with the most capital and expertise from putting their resources to work in the economy. They point to the dramatic decline in private investment during the 1930s as evidence that the elevated taxes were discouraging risk-taking and stifling entrepreneurship.

The authors also criticize President Roosevelt's New Deal initiatives. While recognizing some positive aspects of Roosevelt's New Deal, they argue that many of its programs and regulations actually had unintended negative consequences for economic conditions. They contend that New Deal policies such as the minimum wage, price and wage controls, and government-funded make-work programs discouraged businesses from hiring, reduced real wages, and ultimately hindered a real recovery from the Depression.

Practical Tips

• Diversify your investment portfolio internationally to spread out your potential tax liability. Look into international mutual funds or ETFs that invest in countries with lower tax rates on capital gains and dividends. This strategy can help you keep more of your investment earnings without being as affected by the high marginal tax rates in your own country.
• You can explore micro-investing platforms to start investing with small amounts of money, which can help overcome the fear of risk-taking. By using apps that allow you to invest spare change or small sums, you're able to participate in the investment world without the pressure of large financial commitments. This gradual approach can build your confidence in making investment decisions and understanding market dynamics.
• Start a discussion group with friends or neighbors to brainstorm private sector solutions to unemployment that don't rely on government intervention. This could involve identifying local needs that could be met by new businesses or services and considering what resources would be necessary to start them. For instance, if your community lacks childcare options, the group could explore the feasibility of a cooperative daycare that could provide jobs and meet a pressing need.

Economic Impacts of Wartime Taxes

This section examines the economic impacts of tax policy during World War II, highlighting the distinction between the effects of defense spending and those of general government spending.

WWII Spending Raised GDP but Lowered Living Standards

Contrary to the common perception that World War II brought an end to the Great Depression, Laffer, Domitrovic, and Sinquefield argue that the war, while increasing real GDP, actually reduced Americans' living standards. The massive increase in defense spending during the war led to full employment, but the authors point to the enormous decline in the availability of consumer goods, the sharp decrease in real wages, and the need for longer work hours as evidence that the war did not bring prosperity to the average American household.

The authors explain that producing goods for war, by definition, redirects resources away from creating products and services used for civilian consumption. The factories that were repurposed to produce tanks, planes, and munitions stopped making cars, refrigerators, or other household goods. This shift in production, while increasing overall GDP, led to a significant decrease in the availability of consumer goods.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal budget that prioritizes quality of life over income growth by setting aside funds for experiences and goods that enhance your daily living, even if it means a slower rate of savings. For example, you might choose to live in a slightly more expensive neighborhood that offers better amenities and a stronger community feel, rather than the cheapest area that increases your commute and reduces your leisure time.
• Start a victory garden in your backyard or community space to understand the value of self-sufficiency. Growing your own vegetables and herbs can give you a sense of control and contribution, similar to how home-front efforts supported war economies by reducing the demand for commercial agricultural products.
• Explore historical price adjustments by comparing the cost of common goods during WWII to today's prices using online inflation calculators. This can give you a sense of how real wages and purchasing power have changed over time. For example, you might look at the price of a loaf of bread or a gallon of milk during the 1940s and adjust it for today's inflation to understand the economic impact on individuals.
• Reflect on historical periods of increased work demand to better appreciate current work-life balance. By understanding the context of longer work hours during wartime, you can assess your current workload and strive for a healthier balance. For example, if you find yourself working extended hours, consider the historical necessity of such periods and use this perspective to negotiate more reasonable hours or ensure adequate rest.
• Start a conversation with friends or family about what items they would prioritize in a scarcity scenario. This could be a hypothetical situation where certain consumer goods are limited. Discussing these choices helps you understand the trade-offs that occur when resources are redirected, much like in wartime economies.
• Start a hobby project that involves repurposing or upcycling items that are no longer used for their original intent. This mirrors the concept of factories changing production focus and teaches resourcefulness. You could turn old mason jars into planters or transform a retired bicycle into a unique piece of garden art, demonstrating how everyday objects can have multiple life cycles.
• Learn a new skill that enables you to create or repair everyday items, reducing your dependence on the availability of consumer goods. For instance, take up sewing to mend clothes or woodworking to make simple furniture. There are numerous online tutorials and local workshops that can help you get started, and this knowledge can be both a hobby and a practical way to ensure you have what you need even when store shelves are bare.

Resource Shift to War Production Lowered Consumption and Quality of Life

Laffer, Domitrovic, and Sinquefield assert that the wartime redirection of resources away from civilian production led to a noticeable decline in the quality of life for most Americans. Fewer products for consumers were available, and rationing and regulated pricing further limited access to everyday necessities. The authors point to the decreased availability of food, clothing, gasoline, and other essentials as evidence that wartime prosperity was largely a myth.

Moreover, they assert that the extended work hours necessary to maintain wartime production levels left Americans with less leisure time. People spent more time working, often in difficult conditions, to support the war effort, and the authors argue that this increased workload, while contributing to victory, had the downside of significantly diminishing living standards.

Practical Tips

• Create a resource-sharing network with friends and neighbors to maximize the use of items that are not needed daily. Set up a group chat or a shared spreadsheet where you can list items like power tools, party supplies, or camping gear that members can borrow instead of purchasing.
• You can explore alternative marketplaces to find goods that may be scarce or overpriced in regulated environments. For instance, consider joining or creating a local bartering group where you can trade items or services directly with others, bypassing traditional market constraints.
• Develop a personal rationing plan to manage consumption of essentials. Track your usage of items like food, clothing, and gasoline, and set limits to stretch your resources further. You could, for example, designate certain days for driving to conserve fuel or plan meals to minimize food waste and maximize leftovers.
• Create a leisure plan that includes activities you can do in short bursts throughout the day. This could be as simple as a 5-minute meditation, a quick sketching session, or a brief dance to your favorite song. The idea is to reclaim leisure time in a way that fits into a busy schedule, acknowledging that extended work hours may be a reality but don't have to completely eliminate personal time.
• Volunteer with local organizations that support veterans or active-duty military families. This action directly addresses the human side of wartime efforts by providing practical support to those who are affected by increased workloads and challenging conditions. You could offer to help with daily tasks, provide tutoring or mentoring, or assist with job training programs.

The Impact of Tax Changes on Economic Growth

This section delves into the long-term effects of tax policy on economic growth, focusing on the relative impact of temporary versus permanent tax cuts and the role of marginal tax rates in shaping economic outcomes.

The Importance of Permanent and Instantaneous Tax Changes

This section analyzes the significance of the nature and timing of tax changes, arguing that permanent tax cuts made right away offer greater benefits for economic growth compared to temporary or incremental tax cuts. The authors caution that tax increases, whether temporary or permanent, also carry distinct consequences, impacting economic activity in ways often underestimated by policymakers.

Temporary or Phased Tax Cuts Benefit Economic Growth Less Than Permanent, Immediate Reductions

Laffer, Domitrovic, and Sinquefield emphasize that the nature and timing of tax changes are crucial factors in how they impact the economy. They argue that temporary or incremental tax reductions benefit economic growth less than permanent, immediate ones. When tax reductions are temporary or phased in over several years, as with the 2001 income tax cuts, individuals and businesses have an incentive to delay making investments and realizing income until the full benefits of the tax reductions are in place. This delay, the authors argue, diminishes the positive impact of cutting taxes on economic growth.

Additionally, when tax cuts are set to expire after a certain period, as they were in the tax cuts implemented in 2001 under President Bush, this creates uncertainty for businesses and investors, making long-term planning more difficult and ultimately discouraging investment and job creation. By contrast, permanent tax reductions send a much clearer signal to the market, boosting confidence and encouraging long-term investment without the incentive to postpone economic activities until lower rates kick in.

Other Perspectives

• The anticipation of incremental tax reductions can encourage businesses to plan and invest in a manner that aligns with the phased approach, potentially smoothing out investment over time rather than causing a boom-and-bust cycle.
• Temporary tax cuts can serve as a targeted stimulus without creating long-term fiscal imbalances that might arise from permanent tax reductions.
• Expiration dates on tax cuts can serve as a fiscal control mechanism to prevent long-term revenue loss and address concerns about budget deficits and national debt.
• Encouraging long-term investment is beneficial, but it assumes that all sectors and actors in the economy will benefit equally, which may not be the case. Some industries or income groups might benefit more than others, leading to increased economic inequality.

Temporary or Gradual Tax Hikes Can Impact the Economy More Severely Than Immediate Permanent Ones

The authors warn that the damaging impact of raising taxes is magnified when they are implemented gradually or temporarily. As with the experience of Reagan's initial tax cuts in 1981, when tax increases are introduced gradually over several years, the economy can falter as individuals and businesses anticipate the future higher tax burdens. Companies and investors will choose to take earnings in the years before rates go up. They will delay investment, hiring, and taking profits until the complete tax hikes are implemented.

Additionally, temporary tax increases create economic uncertainty, making it difficult for businesses to plan for the long term. The authors argue that this lack of clarity can stifle growth and economic investments, potentially exacerbating downturns or hindering recoveries. Permanent tax hikes, however, send a clear message, one of a new tax cost structure to which all adjustments in the marketplace will be made.

Context

• Implementing temporary or phased tax changes can increase administrative burdens for both governments and taxpayers, leading to inefficiencies and increased compliance costs.
• Economic models often show that uncertainty in fiscal policy can lead to lower GDP growth rates, as businesses and consumers adjust their behavior in anticipation of future changes.
• Financial markets can react to anticipated tax changes, with potential volatility as investors adjust their portfolios in response to expected shifts in after-tax returns.
• Businesses may delay or alter capital allocation decisions, such as expanding operations or entering new markets, due to uncertainty about future tax liabilities.
• Smaller enterprises, with fewer resources to adapt to changing tax landscapes, may be disproportionately affected, potentially leading to reduced competitiveness and growth.
• With a permanent tax structure, companies can engage in long-term strategic planning, including capital investments and expansion, as they have a clear understanding of future tax liabilities.

The Impact of Marginal Tax Rate Changes

This final section of the book concerns the impact of changes to marginal tax rates on income, exploring how tax rates on those earning the most income impact economic performance.

Reducing Taxes for High Earners Boosts Growth and Revenue

Laffer, Domitrovic, and Sinquefield argue that tax cuts for high earners boost economic growth and often lead to increased overall tax income. They contend that individuals who earn a lot of money—those with the most capital, expertise, and entrepreneurial drive—are crucial for driving economic activity. Therefore, when the rates for high-income individuals are reduced, these individuals are more inclined to invest, grow their businesses, and create jobs, ultimately boosting economic growth.

The authors highlight the tax reductions from the twenties and the eighties as evidence that reducing marginal tax rates for high-income individuals can have a significant positive impact on the economy. In the 1920s, for example, reducing the highest income tax rate from 73% to 25% not only spurred substantial economic growth but also doubled tax revenues from top earners. Similarly, the tax changes made during Reagan's presidency, which significantly reduced marginal tax rates for both individuals and corporations, led to a period of sustained economic growth, a boom in job creation, and a dramatic drop in inflation, all while increasing tax revenue.

Practical Tips

• Engage in peer-to-peer lending platforms to invest in the projects of high-income individuals. This not only provides them with the capital they need to expand their businesses or start new ventures but also allows you to potentially earn interest on your loans. Look for reputable online platforms where you can lend money to vetted individuals who have a track record of successful business ventures.
• You can start a blog or social media page focused on economic history and policy, where you analyze and discuss the effects of tax changes on the economy. By doing this, you create a platform to explore and share insights on how historical tax policies have influenced economic growth, similar to the examples mentioned. This could involve creating infographics, short videos, or articles that break down complex economic concepts into digestible content for your audience.
• You can analyze your personal or business finances to identify areas where reducing costs could lead to growth. For instance, if you're a freelancer, consider lowering your rates for bulk work to secure long-term contracts that could increase your overall income.
• Volunteer to help with financial literacy programs in your community. By sharing knowledge on how to manage personal finances, save money, and understand taxes, you contribute to the economic well-being of others. This can lead to a ripple effect of increased financial stability and growth within your community, reflecting the broader economic principles discussed.

Increased Top Marginal Tax Rates Lower Business Activity and Revenue Collection

Conversely, the authors contend that elevated marginal taxes for top income brackets reduce economic productivity and often lead to decreased tax revenues. The book offers a detailed explanation of how elevated marginal tax percentages disincentivize top earners from generating taxable revenue, and also force those individuals into activities less productive than their primary businesses. People with high incomes, when faced with significantly reduced after-tax returns, may choose to work less, invest less, or move their money to shelters that shield it from taxation, all of which can have a negative impact on overall economic growth.

The authors point to the Depression-era, the stagflation in the 1970s, and the sluggish performance in the 2000s as examples of how high income tax rates for top earners harm the economy. They also use these examples to explain their view that elevated rates for top earners generally do little to increase total tax revenues. For instance, regarding the Great Depression, the 1932 tax hike, which more than doubled the highest tax bracket rate from 25% to 63% in the midst of an economic crisis, deepened the downturn and actually reduced tax revenue as high earners took more extreme measures to avoid paying those rates. Similarly, stagflation in the seventies, characterized by high inflation, bracket creep, and additional tax hikes, discouraged investment and work, contributing to a prolonged period of economic misery. Similarly, during the 2000s, the administrations of Bush and Obama struggled to address the lackluster economy, offering temporary tax cuts and various tax credits to stimulate growth. These attempts, while offering short-term relief in some cases, did not address the fundamental issue of excessive rates on additional income that, Laffer, Domitrovic, and Sinquefield believe, were hindering the economy long-term.

Other Perspectives

• The historical examples cited may not be directly comparable due to differences in the broader economic context, policy environment, and other variables that could have influenced economic outcomes.
• The relationship between tax rates and work effort among high earners is complex, and some research suggests that changes in tax rates have minimal effects on the amount of work and effort top earners are willing to put into income-generating activities.
• Tax shelters and other avoidance strategies may be less prevalent than suggested if tax laws are well-designed and enforcement is effective, minimizing the impact of higher tax rates on the movement of money to such shelters.
• The relationship between tax rates and economic growth is not linear and can be influenced by how tax revenue is utilized, such as investments in infrastructure, education, and research and development that can stimulate economic growth.
• Progressive taxation, where higher earners pay a larger percentage of their income, can be justified on grounds of fairness and reducing income inequality, which can have positive social outcomes that are not captured by focusing solely on tax revenue or economic growth.
• The 1970s saw significant advancements in workers' rights and the establishment of environmental regulations, which, while potentially contributing to increased business costs, also led to long-term benefits that are not captured by focusing solely on the immediate economic impacts of tax policy.
• The long-term economic impact of tax policy changes often requires a comprehensive analysis that goes beyond the immediate aftermath of tax cuts or credits, considering factors such as debt, investment, and structural changes in the economy.
• The concept of the Laffer Curve, which posits that there is an optimal tax rate that maximizes revenue, is theoretically sound, but the exact peak of the curve is difficult to determine and may be higher than what some economists claim.