PDF Summary:Slicing Pie Handbook, by Mike Moyer

When starting a new business, one of the key challenges is how to distribute equity fairly among the team. In the Slicing Pie Handbook, Mike Moyer proposes a model called the "Slicing Pie" approach for allocating ownership stakes equitably and dynamically.

The model aims to align equity shares with actual contributions and risks taken by team members. Moyer outlines the methods for converting monetary investments and non-monetary contributions like labor and ideas into ownership percentages. The book also covers frameworks for dealing with team members leaving the company and properly managing contributed assets. By providing a fair system for dividing the pie of equity, the Slicing Pie approach seeks to foster harmony and prevent conflicts in early-stage startups.

(continued)...

• Assigning a value to non-monetary contributions based on commercial worth involves quantifying the value of intangible inputs like time, expertise, and networks in terms of their potential impact on the business. This process helps in fairly recognizing the significance of non-financial contributions within the company's equity distribution framework. By attributing a commercial value to these non-monetary inputs, the Slicing Pie method ensures that all forms of contributions are accounted for when determining ownership stakes. The valuation considers the market rates or customary compensation that these contributions would command in a financially stable business environment.
• The Recovery Framework in the Slicing Pie method outlines the procedures for reclaiming equity when a participant leaves the company. Individuals leaving due to valid reasons forfeit their non-cash equity, while those departing without fault retain their ownership stake. The company may choose to repurchase the equity of departing members, but it is not mandatory. Physical assets are re-evaluated without applying multipliers when equity is reclaimed.
• When an individual leaves a company, the treatment of physical assets involves re-evaluating these assets without applying any multipliers. The initial investment in physical assets is returned to the departing individual without any additional rewards for the risks associated with these assets. The company may also have the authority to repurchase any shares held by the departing individual or other entities.
• When an individual leaves a company, the company may have the option to repurchase the ownership stake that the departing individual held. This repurchase can be at the company's discretion and is not always a mandatory requirement. It provides flexibility for the company to manage its ownership structure and potentially reallocate shares to current or new members as needed.

Proper management of contributed assets, whether financial or otherwise, is crucial.

This segment explores the tangible elements of managing various types of input typically utilized in establishing a new business venture.

Monetary investments, including any outlays that remain uncompensated, are assigned slices corresponding to the exact sum of money expended.

Moyer highlights how individuals engaged with startups often finance company expenses out of pocket, considering such actions as investments in the business. If a person covers a valid business expense from their own funds without being compensated, this is considered a monetary contribution to the business. The method for determining the slice count involves quadrupling the total amount spent, indicative of the cash multiplier.

The approach referred to as "Slicing Pie" recommends establishing a shared pool for financial investments in a business.

To manage the substantial monetary investments often contributed by the founders, friends, or family members when starting a business, Moyer presents the concept of a business "Reservoir." As the business utilizes the invested funds, it correspondingly allocates shares of equity. This approach ensures that the distribution of ownership reflects actual financial contributions instead of just expected involvement. The Well recommends that managers prudently manage cash expenditures to guarantee a more substantial portion of the company's ownership is allocated.

Ownership shares are allocated in accordance with the real market value of non-monetary inputs including labor, expertise, relationships, and asset utilization.

Moyer emphasizes the importance of varied contributions, highlighting that value stems not only from monetary investments but also from non-monetary assets. Contributions like work, creativity, connections, space, and machinery are all appreciated and fairly compensated through the distribution of respective shares in ownership.

The framework recognizes the inherent risks associated with non-monetary contributions and offers a unique multiplier to account for them.

Moyer advises evaluating non-monetary contributions by examining what the usual compensation would be for comparable tasks at an established firm that offers customary market salaries. The method involves calculating fair remuneration for the time invested, establishing a reward for creative contributions, or assessing charges for revenue accrued through connections. Contributions that are not in cash are valued more highly to account for associated risks, employing a multiplier that doubles their value.

Other Perspectives

• The "Slicing Pie" model assumes that all financial contributions are equal in value, but this may not account for the strategic importance or timing of certain investments.
• Assigning slices based on the exact sum of money expended might not reflect the true value of the investment, especially if the money is used inefficiently.
• The shared pool for financial investments could lead to disagreements on what constitutes a fair share, especially as the business evolves and the value of those investments changes.
• Allocating ownership shares based on real market value of non-monetary inputs is subjective and may not accurately reflect the future value those contributions bring to the company.
• The unique multiplier for non-monetary contributions might overvalue certain inputs while undervaluing others, especially if the risk associated with those contributions is not as high as presumed.
• The framework may not be flexible enough to accommodate the dynamic nature of startups, where roles and contributions can change rapidly.
• The method of calculating fair remuneration for non-monetary contributions might not be applicable in all industries or for all types of contributions.

When integrating the concepts from Slicing Pie into fiscal and legal structures, one must exercise thorough diligence.

This section explores the integration of Slicing Pie with different funding approaches and organizational legal frameworks. The manual provides insights on how to successfully apply the framework when setting up a fresh business venture.

The book explores different methods of funding, including investments from founders, loans, and venture capital, emphasizing the unique importance of each option.

Moyer details the array of funding strategies accessible to new ventures and elucidates how Slicing Pie can be incorporated with these methods. Every method of financing impacts how shares are allocated and changes the list of individuals who hold ownership in the business.

Opting for debt financing might limit how slices can be distributed, unlike the possibilities that equity financing might offer.

In the Slicing Pie model, obtaining funds through debt mechanisms like loans is frequently considered an economical choice as it prevents the immediate reduction in ownership percentage. The obligation to repay the loan rests with the company, and unless a default occurs, the lender does not acquire any entitlement to slices. Debt is often the method of choice for significant purchases, especially when the business can sustain regular payments.

The Slicing Pie model presents a distinct method for individual angel investors in contrast to convertible notes and SAFEs.

Moyer suggests that for those not actively participating in the business, traditional financial mechanisms like future equity agreements or convertible debt instruments should be employed. These kinds of arrangements typically take place in the realm of angel investing and do not influence the allocation of equity shares directly. Ownership interests are often established through these monetary tools in later stages, especially when a priced funding round is led by investors specializing in early-stage company financing.

The framework known as Slicing Pie can be tailored to fit different legal structures, ensuring it addresses issues of governance, taxation, and the safeguarding of intellectual property and innovations.

When implementing the Slicing Pie framework, it's crucial to consider the legal facets, such as the company's framework, management, tax implications, and the management and rights associated with intellectual property.

Arrangements under the Slicing Pie model must clearly define the methods for distribution and recovery with precision.

Moyer emphasizes the importance of incorporating the Slicing Pie model into contracts that are legally binding. The contract should clearly define the methods for distribution and remuneration, specifying the approach for determining the equitable market value and the particular criteria that control the handling of departures. It safeguards the stakeholders' interests and helps to avert disagreements.

Implementing the Slicing Pie approach requires a grasp of the local legal and tax consequences, along with necessary adjustments.

The Slicing Pie method provides a globally flexible structure, and Moyer acknowledges that financial obligations vary according to the distinct regulatory landscape of each area. It is crucial to seek advice from consultants well-versed in the legal and tax regulations pertinent to your locality to ensure compliance and minimize potential liabilities. This could involve addressing obstacles like adhering to legal requirements for employee minimum wages, limitations on contracts that limit competition from past workers, and the fiscal consequences associated with stock options.

Other Perspectives

• While thorough diligence is important, it can be argued that the complexity of integrating Slicing Pie with legal and fiscal structures may deter some entrepreneurs from using it, potentially leading to simpler but less equitable models being favored.
• The book's exploration of different funding methods may not fully account for the rapidly changing landscape of startup financing, where new instruments and platforms are constantly emerging.
• The assertion that each funding method impacts share allocation and ownership might oversimplify the nuances and potential for customized agreements that can vary significantly from one startup to another.
• The idea that debt financing may limit slice distribution compared to equity financing does not consider that debt can sometimes be converted to equity, which could offer a strategic advantage in certain situations.
• Slicing Pie's unique method for individual angel investors might not be the best fit for all types of investors or investment scenarios, especially those looking for more traditional and less dynamic equity arrangements.
• Tailoring the Slicing Pie framework to fit different legal structures may not be feasible or practical in all jurisdictions, especially those with rigid corporate laws that do not accommodate such flexible arrangements.
• Clearly defining distribution and recovery methods is critical, but the Slicing Pie model may not account for all possible scenarios, leaving room for disputes or legal challenges.
• Understanding local legal and tax consequences is essential, but the Slicing Pie framework may not be adaptable to all regulatory environments, potentially limiting its applicability in certain regions or industries.

Putting the Slicing Pie approach into practice.

This segment of the conversation focuses on the practical steps necessary to implement the Slicing Pie framework and addresses common concerns.

The Pie Slicer is an intuitive online platform that tracks inputs and allocates slices based on them.

The Pie Slicer, a digital tool designed to facilitate the use of the Slicing Pie model, was created by Mike Moyer. The method streamlines the management of company equity.

The Pie Slicer simplifies the calculations related to the Slicing Pie model and incorporates features for reporting.

The Pie Slicer acts as an all-encompassing tool for tracking contributions, managing the company's resources, and allocating shares of ownership. It eliminates the need for manual calculations, reduces the likelihood of errors, and makes the reporting process more efficient. The approach continuously adjusts ownership shares to reflect the input of each participant, ensuring equitable distribution of equity.

Individuals employing the Pie Slicer model can take on a range of roles such as owner, supervisor, staff member, or advisor.

The Pie Slicer tool offers different levels of control and administrative functions. The owners of the Pie have full authority over its management, including the ability to modify settings, add new members to the team, and manage the Well. Executives may notice the distribution of the Pie, but they typically lack the authority to control it. The method ensures that individuals can only see their own contributions, thus keeping attention directed and privacy intact.

Integrating the Slicing Pie framework into a pre-existing business requires careful documentation of past contributions.

This section is designed for businesses contemplating a shift from conventional static equity splits to adopting the Slicing Pie approach. Moyer acknowledges that this transition can be complex but outlines practical tools to manage it.

Company founders have the ability to adjust the allocation of equity shares by implementing a system that takes into consideration previous inputs, known as the retrofit/forecast.

Moyer presents a tool known as Retrofit/Forecast that aids companies in moving from a fixed equity split towards adopting the dynamic Slicing Pie model. The approach equips business founders with a detailed framework for recording past inputs and converting them into corresponding shares, which in turn recalibrates equity distribution based on the tenets of the Slicing Pie formula. This approach ensures a fair allocation of ownership and provides a transparent way to address any imbalances that might have arisen from the initial equity division.

Educating team members about the fundamentals of the Slicing Pie model and addressing their concerns is crucial for their adoption of the system.

Implementing the Slicing Pie model in a pre-existing business often involves addressing concerns that arise among the employees. Open dialogue and learning are key elements that Moyer stresses. By emphasizing the equitable, clear, and dispute-preventing characteristics of the approach, teams can surmount reservations and adopt a more enduring method for distributing ownership stakes.

Other Perspectives

• The Pie Slicer may oversimplify complex equity situations that require more nuanced legal and financial consideration.
• Relying on an online platform like the Pie Slicer could pose data security risks or become a single point of failure if the system experiences downtime or technical issues.
• The roles within the Pie Slicer model may not align with every organizational structure, potentially leading to confusion or misalignment with existing roles and responsibilities.
• Documenting past contributions for the integration of the Slicing Pie framework could be subject to inaccuracies or disagreements on the value of those contributions.
• The retrofit/forecast system may not be able to perfectly account for all the nuances of past contributions, leading to potential disputes or feelings of unfairness.
• Not all team members may agree with or understand the principles of the Slicing Pie model, which could lead to resistance or rejection of the system.
• The Slicing Pie model, while aiming for fairness, may not be the best fit for every company culture or business model, and alternative equity distribution methods might be more appropriate in certain contexts.