PDF Summary:Say Nothing, by Patrick Radden Keefe

The long and brutal conflict in Northern Ireland, known as the Troubles, deeply impacted countless lives. In Say Nothing, Patrick Radden Keefe examines the rise of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) and its strategy of armed resistance against British rule. The book delves into the lives of key figures—including Gerry Adams and the Price sisters—and their roles in the transition from violence to political activism.

Keefe provides a nuanced look at the British government's counterinsurgency efforts and the moral challenges faced by both sides as informants were embedded within the IRA. Though peace has been established, the legacy of the Troubles lingers, and the book explores the challenges of reconciliation in a still-divided society.

(continued)...

The MRF dubbed its crucial network of informants within the IRA as "the Freds," emphasizing their importance. A newlywed working in road construction became involved in the conflict as vulnerabilities emerged related to his recent change in marital life. The military authorities, having knowledge of his participation in a bombing, exerted pressure on him to divulge his accomplices' identities to evade incarceration. Wright worked with the British military for several months, aiding in the identification of individuals associated with the Provisional IRA and in the selection of possible targets. When Wright voiced his intentions to depart, his superiors categorically stated that departure was out of the question and further warned they would reveal his deceit. The astute leader of D Company, Brendan Hughes, swiftly discerned the plot and opted to enlist Wright as a triple agent to act for the IRA within the Freds, rather than ordering his execution. He persisted in his endeavors until the Provisional IRA captured and subsequently murdered him. In his teenage years, Kevin McKee became affiliated with the group known as the Freds. The British acknowledged McKee's skills and, referring to him as "Beaky," apprehended him due to his participation in the IRA's youth wing, where he was involved in hurling projectiles at British troops. He exemplified the kind of new member that Kitson had sought in Kenya: an individual motivated by high principles, courageous in the presence of peril, and profoundly fascinated by the notion of handling arms. Authorities equipped McKee with a firearm, fostered his marksmanship at a firing range, and entrusted him with sensitive intelligence, all in an effort to win his trust and persuade him to switch allegiances. The scheme worked.

State participation in the violent actions carried out by pro-unionist groups: The Ethical Consequences of Unconventional Tactics and the Diminishing Distinction Between Fighters and Non-Combatants

Brian Nelson was implicated in the clandestine activities and the killing of Pat Finucane.

The moral quandaries linked to informant utilization troubled more than just the republicans. Keefe underscores the military's role in the killing of Pat Finucane, a Belfast attorney, highlighting the increasingly blurred lines between the organizations formally charged with fighting terrorism and the secret government bodies engaging in terrorist activities. In the early stages of the Troubles, Finucane, who was a young lawyer at the time, offered legal advice to many leading republicans, including Gerry Adams. As the 1970s drew to a close, Adams's decision to participate in the political arena and steer the IRA's activities towards a political initiative within Sinn Féin incited fury among hardline republicans like Hughes, resulting in a rift that fractured the solidarity within the Irish Republican Army. The authorities maintained their initial approach for a prolonged duration, steadfastly refusing to acknowledge the republicans as anything other than perpetrators of violence, even though the conflict had grown to include both armed confrontations and deliberate political maneuvers.

For a considerable duration, UK officials carefully cultivated the image of the armed forces as a neutral, though reluctant, participant in the conflict. The sole purpose of sending military forces to Northern Ireland was to protect the civilian population. In actuality, the army regarded the IRA as their principal foe, while they saw organizations such as the Ulster Volunteer Force as secondary in significance or potentially advantageous to the state's endeavors. The military intelligence, after establishing the Force Research Unit (FRU), a covert group that succeeded Frank Kitson's MRF, intensified its efforts to weaken the IRA by employing a variety of secretive tactics, which included collaboration with the loyalist factions they were purportedly aiming to neutralize. The story provides a troubling depiction of treachery, illustrating how individuals like Brian Nelson were enlisted by British military agents and utilized to carry out covert operations intended to intensify the strife between Catholic and Protestant factions, thus framing loyalist violence as a response to IRA terrorist activities.

Nelson, who grew up in Belfast's Protestant community, joined the British Army and subsequently received orders for deployment to Northern Ireland. His renown as a fearless and relentless marksman increased when he became an active combatant dedicated to the cause of unionist paramilitary efforts, which paralleled the intensifying savagery of the conflict. Upon his release from confinement, military intelligence identified an opportunity to utilize his history of passionate activism for their benefit. Nelson joined the FRU and initiated the orchestration of assassinations in Belfast, which were delineated by religious divisions. Keefe emphasizes the disconcerting circumstances in which the British government, through allowing Nelson's actions during his tenure, became inadvertently involved in the same acts of violence they intended to halt. An informant with connections to British intelligence was later discovered to have obtained the weapons used in the assassination.

Other Perspectives

• The British Army's initial deployment could be seen as a necessary response to escalating violence and a breakdown in local law enforcement capabilities.
• Detention without trial and curfews, while controversial, may have been viewed by the government as essential for maintaining order and preventing further violence.
• Counterinsurgency tactics, such as those developed by Frank Kitson, might be defended as a pragmatic adaptation to the unique challenges of urban guerrilla warfare.
• The use of rigorous interrogation methods by the MRF could be justified as a means to gather vital intelligence to prevent future terrorist attacks.
• The strategy of developing informants within the IRA could be argued as a standard and effective practice in intelligence work to infiltrate and disrupt terrorist organizations.
• The recruitment of individuals like Seamus Wright and Kevin McKee might be seen as exploiting existing vulnerabilities within the IRA to reduce its effectiveness.
• The involvement of individuals like Brian Nelson in clandestine activities could be rationalized as part of a broader strategy to infiltrate and undermine paramilitary groups.
• The collaboration between the military and loyalist factions might be defended as a form of counter-terrorism, aiming to use all available means to protect the public and dismantle terrorist networks.

The impact on personal experiences and the wider society from the period known as the Troubles includes the consequences of hunger strikes, the role of informers, and the lasting influence of the conflict.

The narrative of the McConville family epitomizes the deep-seated division and destruction that unfolded during the unrest in Belfast.

The IRA capitalized on the sorrow of Jean's children after her disappearance by falsely alleging that she had betrayed their cause.

The assassination of Jean McConville stood out as a case that deeply concerned the IRA leadership, given her status as a Protestant widow and the fact that her death resulted in her children being orphaned. Despite the firm stance of the Irish Republican Army's Provisional faction that their actions constituted legitimate warfare against an oppressive regime, the secretive kidnapping and killing of a mother of ten still presents a challenge to rationalize. Eighteen-year-old Helen McConville contacted republican leaders soon after her mother's disappearance, pleading with them to reveal the circumstances of her mother's absence and the location of her final resting place. Speculation was rife that Jean McConville's demise stemmed from her supposed intimate ties to a British serviceman, leading to conjecture that she might have escaped to England alongside him, abandoning her offspring. Jean's fate was thought to have been sealed by her choice to refrain from assaulting an injured British serviceman, a decision that led to what many considered a deeply treacherous deed. During a lull in the shooting, an incident forever etched in her children's memories, they huddled in the faint light of their dwelling, attuned to the anguished wails originating close to their doorway. In the corridor, a British serviceman sustained injuries.

Jean McConville, recognized for her deep empathy which she showed even towards adversaries, provided comfort to the individual in his final moments. Upon her return, she found the phrase "BRITT LOVER" scrawled across the entrances to her children's bedrooms. She was incarcerated the following day. The McConville siblings endured a prolonged and challenging process of reconciling themselves with these events. The Catholic Church, or occasionally the state, oversaw the division and allocation to various institutions. Evidently, instead of providing support to the children, a number of individuals in these establishments exploited their defenselessness, subjecting them to physical harm, extreme lack of adequate nutrition, and appalling acts of sexual violence. Despite their ongoing battle with substance addiction, the siblings remained united against any attempts by authorities to separate their kin. Michael McConville, according to his discussion with Keefe, ended up in a juvenile detention center because of his repeated efforts to escape. He returned to West Belfast at the age of sixteen. The unwavering faith of the children in their mother was constantly shadowed by the sorrowful tale of her demise and the questionable claims propagated by officials of the IRA and their media counterparts, who branded Jean McConville as an informant. The insinuation that their family members died as informants, which suggests they contributed to their own deaths instead of being accidental casualties, was especially upsetting to the families of the disappeared.

Bobby Sands spearheaded a hunger strike, and the Price sisters demonstrated unyielding opposition to British dominance.

The Price Sisters' prolonged hunger strike, which lasted 206 days, their subjection to forced feeding while incarcerated in Brixton Prison, and the wider narrative of self-sacrifice for Irish causes.

Keefe delivers a detailed account of the prison hunger strikes that took place in 1974 and 1981, highlighting the unwavering commitment to Irish nationalist ideals and the moral quandaries inherent in these politically motivated acts of self-denial. Upon their arrest for participating in the London car bombing, the Price sisters initiated a hunger strike, demanding to be acknowledged as political prisoners instead of common criminals, and insisted on being relocated to a prison within Northern Ireland. The sisters, by aligning themselves with the legacy of Terence MacSwiney, the emblematic republican figure who a half-century prior had chosen starvation leading to death as a form of protest against his incarceration, were channeling a deeply ingrained concept within the ethos deeply rooted in the national consciousness, which holds self-sacrifice as an unassailable tool, a method of wielding ultimate power that remains beyond the reach of British control.

The movement's reputation paradoxically diminished as a result of strategies implemented by the UK authorities. The choice to refuse food, once seen as a noble act of protest, could deteriorate into a distressing display, exposing the young activists to severe public scrutiny and a perilous condition necessitating medical intervention. To ensure the welfare of key prisoners, British officials resorted to the controversial practice of using tubes inserted through the prisoners' throats to directly provide nourishment to their stomachs. Allegations often arose that the authorities subjected prisoners to torture, a practice that provoked alarm and posed risks. The siblings' resolve only intensified against the government's attempts to suppress it, ultimately leading to the creation of a powerful new legend based on their sacrifice. In the context of Irish republicanism, it was the women, exemplifying a gentle femininity, who courageously faced off against British antagonism, instead of the men.

In 1981, Bobby Sands, along with nine other prisoners connected to the IRA, some of whom had been held with Adams and Hughes, commenced a hunger strike that unveiled the far-reaching consequences of the protest led by the Price sisters. In a brief span of time, Sands was elected to Parliament as the representative for Fermanagh and South Tyrone, a victory that elevated the plight of the hunger strikers and the Irish republican movement to a level of prominence that previous acts of terrorism had not accomplished. The UK authorities remained resolute and permitted Sands to perish while incarcerated. Nine more individuals, aligned with the republican movement, sequentially passed away over a prolonged summer, each due to the refusal to eat. The operations of the IRA, although symbolically significant, presented a substantial strategic setback. Despite the ultimate sacrifice of every hunger striker, the position of the British government remained unchanged.

Freddie Scappaticci's involvement with the IRA and the implementation of a deadly code of silence by the Nutting Squad.

Trevor Campbell had the complex duty of overseeing informants embedded within the closely knit neighborhoods of Belfast.

The IRA's survival in Northern Ireland hinged on its ability to operate clandestinely. In areas where the local populace supported the Provisional IRA en masse, their militant members operated under a robust veil of secrecy, rendering their deeds invisible to outsiders. The community ostracized those labeled as informants, subjecting their families to shame and exacting harsh consequences upon the individuals themselves. A specialized unit within the Irish Republican Army used severe methods of torture to extract confessions from those they suspected of betrayal before carrying out their executions. Freddie Scappaticci, often known as "Scap" and recognized for his sturdy physique and wide chest, came from a different region than South Belfast and was widely considered the most formidable figure in the Nutting Squad.

Scappaticci was detained for a period during his youth at Long Kesh. In 1978, he made the decision to offer his services as an informant by entering a British Army barracks. The disclosure of this betrayal, surfacing after thirty years, sparked a wave of unrest within the ranks of the Irish Republican Army. Scappaticci, who was referred to as Stakeknife, occupied a secretive and crucial role, believed to be intricately connected to the IRA while concurrently supplying vital information to the British military in Northern Ireland. As the conflict in Northern Ireland was drawing to a close, the Provisional IRA paradoxically entrusted their internal security to the very person who was actively undermining it. The individuals supervising Scappaticci gained an exceptional level of understanding, supplying them with not just useful, but indeed indispensable intelligence. The UK authorities placed a substantial amount of confidence in their esteemed informant, allowing Scappaticci considerable leeway in his activities. Stakeknife's liberation ultimately led to the downfall of those he once worked alongside. To maintain the agent's anonymity in an environment where spying frequently resulted in immediate death, the strategy necessitated that the operative persist in carrying out deadly operations.

In a community still grappling with entrenched divides, despite an established peace, efforts to achieve reconciliation continue amid persistent collective trauma and moral injury.

The Cyprus Avenue event symbolizes the ongoing challenges stemming from historical strife in Northern Ireland, highlighting the significance of the peace walls in Belfast.

Keefe emphasizes the lasting effects of the conflict, noting that the "disappeared" – those abducted and murdered by the Provos, whose bodies have yet to be found – are tragically the ones most failed by the peace agreement that Adams helped negotiate. After the conflict ended in 1994, a growing movement, represented by a small blue emblem, effectively lobbied the British and Irish governments to establish an impartial organization dedicated to determining the locations of those who had disappeared and to guarantee their respectful repatriation to family members for proper burial ceremonies. The persistent activities of the commission continually highlighted the IRA's inclination towards severity and the continuous ambiguity in accountability. In their zeal to move forward into an era of shared absolution after enduring prolonged sectarian conflict, it seemed that those who were lost and considered dispensable had been relegated to the periphery, their stories difficult and inconvenient to integrate.

The accord established on Good Friday did not eliminate the pre-existing divisions but instead provided them with a more permanent framework. The division in social settings, employment environments, educational institutions, and drinking establishments persisted, with people adhering to groups aligned with their respective religious affiliations, either Catholic or Protestant. By this time, the neighborhoods that initially experienced the outbreak of citywide conflicts in the late 1960s had become increasingly segregated by "peace walls" – towering structures that established distinct demarcations between neighboring areas. The Good Friday Agreement was seen by many long-standing participants in the conflict as a renunciation of their deeply held beliefs and political goals. Families of the disappeared were denied the opportunity to mourn their lost loved ones. Many people, profoundly influenced by their intense engagement in the conflict, later experienced a sense of alienation from the narrative that emerged following the confrontation in Belfast.

Other Perspectives

• The narrative of the McConville family, while significant, is one of many and may not fully encapsulate the complexity and diversity of experiences during the Troubles.
• The assertion that the IRA falsely alleged Jean McConville's betrayal could be contested by some who argue that there may have been evidence supporting the IRA's claims, although such evidence has not been publicly substantiated.
• The idea that the assassination of Jean McConville deeply concerned the IRA leadership could be nuanced by suggesting that the level of concern varied among different factions within the IRA.
• The speculation about Jean McConville's demise and her ties to a British serviceman could be seen as an oversimplification of the motives and circumstances surrounding her death.
• The experiences of the McConville siblings, while tragic, might not be representative of all children who went through similar institutions during that time.
• The portrayal of the Price sisters' hunger strike could be criticized for romanticizing the act of self-sacrifice and not sufficiently acknowledging the ethical dilemmas and human cost of such protests.
• The UK authorities' use of forced feeding could be defended as a legal and medical response to a life-threatening situation, aiming to preserve life rather than as a form of punishment or coercion.
• Freddie Scappaticci's involvement with the IRA and his role as an informant could be viewed through a lens of moral ambiguity, where individuals in conflict situations are often forced to make difficult choices for survival.
• The ongoing efforts for reconciliation in Northern Ireland could be criticized for not adequately addressing the needs and grievances of all communities affected by the Troubles.
• The Cyprus Avenue event and the peace walls in Belfast could be interpreted as necessary measures for maintaining peace and preventing further violence, rather than solely as symbols of persistent division.

Discussions of a political nature and strategic bargaining took place not only within the Republican Movement but also during the dialogues involving representatives of the IRA and those from Britain.

In 1972, Hughes, along with other leaders of the IRA, initiated discussions with representatives from Britain.

Seán Mac Stíofáin's inflexible position led to the collapse of negotiations.

The early attempts at negotiating peace, as detailed by Keefe, underscore the unwavering resolve of specific members of the Irish Republican Army, whose commitment persisted through the prolonged strife, indicating the sheer unlikelihood of achieving an agreement through diplomatic means in 1972. During the persistent unrest, the Irish Republican Army surprisingly declared a cessation of their armed operations in the summer of 1972. This ephemeral period brought a brief surge of optimism to the region, but the fragile ceasefire disintegrated in less than two weeks, leading to the resurgence of conflict. In the subsequent days, a contingent of IRA chiefs, including Gerry Adams and Brendan Hughes, as well as the Chief of Staff, Seán Mac Stíofáin, were escorted by British troops in a military helicopter to a secret meeting near Belfast. They were clandestinely flown to London on a British armed forces aircraft.

That evening, the Irishmen, dressed informally, went to a significant meeting at a Chelsea home where they met with William Whitelaw, the British government's principal representative for Northern Ireland. The men were filled with apprehension and mistrust, fully aware of the long and troubled history of unsuccessful talks between emissaries of the United Kingdom and the Irish state. But there was a feeling, too, that the Provos, after bringing three years of relentless gun battles, bomb raids, and bank robberies to the British, had earned a certain legitimacy, and that the government, which still refused to call their war a “war," might now be prepared to negotiate a peace agreement. Mac Stíofáin, known for his uncompromising stance, insisted on conditions that were impractical, including a requirement for the British government to cede all control over the Protestant community, a guarantee that exceeded what the government could offer. Whitelaw endeavored to forge a relationship. He made certain to refer to the fervent orator by his preferred name "Seán," rather than the name he was assigned at birth, "John Stephenson." Upon their return from the unsuccessful peace negotiations in London, Adams and his fellow IRA members were once again embroiled in conflict.

Gerry Adams' transformation in leadership involved transitioning from a combative approach to advocating for a dual strategy that intertwines military action with political tactics.

The evolution of Sinn Féin from a marginal political entity to a pivotal force in peace talks and a strong competitor in elections throughout the nation.

Gerry Adams led a new strategy that emphasized a sustained campaign to secure political support for Irish unification, shifting from the simplistic notion that solely through violence would the British be driven out. Guided by Adams, Sinn Féin underwent a calculated transformation in its public image. The group initially emerged as a relatively obscure, traditional political group with limited support in Northern Ireland and was practically unnoticed in the southern part of Ireland. Adams saw an opportunity to shift the IRA's focus from military engagement to a political strategy. The goal to change the strategy initially faced resistance from IRA members, particularly in Belfast, who viewed Sinn Féin as having minimal importance, with their commitment leaning more towards direct combat rather than formulating political tactics or creating policies.

Adams, despite later denials, was intricately involved with the operations of the IRA. Before his imprisonment, he served as a leader in the Belfast Brigade. While imprisoned, he developed strong connections with unwavering ideologists, including Bobby Sands. After being freed from Long Kesh in the mid-1970s, Adams was instrumental in guiding the movement down a new trajectory. He championed a sophisticated and thoughtful strategy among the IRA members, rather than relying exclusively on aggressive methods to bring about an immediate and drastic outcome. The approach consisted of a vigorous initiative aimed at undermining the resolve of the leadership in both Britain and Northern Ireland's Protestant community, coupled with a political maneuver intended to initially expand its support within Northern Ireland and subsequently gain endorsement from the Republic. The intensification of hostilities carried out by the IRA inadvertently strengthened public support for Sinn Féin's pursuit of peaceful reform.

The enduring legacy of Bobby Sands and the pivotal role played by Adams in negotiating the Good Friday Agreement, which signaled the end of the Troubles.

The agreement acknowledged the Catholic community's desire for Irish reunification and established the prerequisites for a possible vote on the issue.

The widespread acclaim for the 1998 endorsement of the Good Friday Agreement hailed it as a triumph of reason and a testament to the willingness to find common ground. Following a prolonged period marked by internal conflict and loss of life, which was ultimately settled not by the combatants themselves but by the harsh realities of population dynamics and financial factors, leading members from Sinn Féin, the SDLP, the Unionist parties, and delegates from both the United Kingdom and Ireland reached a consensus on a blueprint that laid the groundwork for a joint administrative system. The accord ensured that Northern Ireland remained a part of the United Kingdom, while also creating a separate parliament for the area, and it additionally set up a North-South Ministerial Council to supervise collaborative projects and promote better relations between the Northern and Southern regions. The core principle acknowledged that most inhabitants on the island favored the concept of a unified Ireland and laid the groundwork for the possibility of a referendum on the issue in the future. Meanwhile, Sinn Féin was afforded the opportunity to engage directly in the administration of the region known as Ulster, even as British authority continued to be a presence. The pact represented a pinnacle of strategic political navigation. The deeds committed were the responsibility of the Irish Republican Army.

Other Perspectives

• The assertion that Seán Mac Stíofáin's inflexibility was solely responsible for the collapse of negotiations may overlook other factors, such as the British government's unwillingness to meet certain IRA demands or broader political contexts.
• The idea that the ceasefire disintegrated solely due to the IRA's actions does not account for the possibility of provocations or failures by other parties that could have contributed to the resumption of conflict.
• While Gerry Adams is credited with leading a shift in IRA strategy, it could be argued that this transition was also influenced by broader changes within the Republican Movement and external political pressures.
• The evolution of Sinn Féin from a marginal entity to a significant force could be seen as part of a larger trend of political realignment and not solely the result of Adams' leadership or the IRA's military campaign.
• The role of Gerry Adams in negotiating the Good Friday Agreement might be overstated, as the peace process was the result of collective efforts involving many individuals and groups, including those from the British and Irish governments, as well as other political and community leaders in Northern Ireland.
• The Good Friday Agreement's acknowledgment of the Catholic community's desire for Irish reunification could be criticized for not equally emphasizing the desires of the Protestant community for maintaining the union with Britain, potentially presenting a one-sided view of the agreement's provisions.