PDF Summary:Romney, by McKay Coppins

In Romney, McKay Coppins offers an inside look at Mitt Romney's political evolution. The book chronicles how Romney moved from a successful business career into politics, demonstrating pragmatism and a willingness to compromise that contrasted with the Republican Party's growing shift toward conservatism and populist views.

Coppins details Romney's struggles within the party as he rejected Donald Trump's norm-defying rhetoric and authoritarian tendencies. His actions in voting to convict Trump during his impeachment trials solidified Romney's role as a staunch defender of democratic values, even as many Republicans embraced Trump's falsehoods about election fraud.

(continued)...

• He ran for the Republican presidential nomination in 1968. Although his campaign was ultimately unsuccessful, he was known for his moderate views and opposition to the Vietnam War, which distinguished him from many of his contemporaries.
• Before his political career, George Romney was the CEO of American Motors Corporation, where he was credited with turning the company around by focusing on smaller, more fuel-efficient cars.
• The Romney family's history of migration, including their ancestors' journey from England to the United States and later to Mexico, involved overcoming numerous hardships, such as economic instability and displacement, which contributed to a legacy of resilience.

Mitt Romney acquired essential insights into politics from the challenges encountered by his father during his professional journey.

Romney greatly admired the courage his father demonstrated in politics and took lessons from the obstacles he faced, particularly from the controversial statements made during the presidential campaign of 1968. Romney noted that George's presidential ambitions were swiftly thwarted by an ill-considered remark that compared military briefings with "brainwashing," even though he was a firm supporter of civil rights and stood against political radicalism. Romney's background led him to be highly cautious about avoiding political errors, which in turn made him emphasize a uniform message and strictly conform to his party's ideological lines during media engagements.

Romney’s career bears out this cautious approach, Coppins reveals. Romney meticulously shaped his public image as he rose through the ranks of the financial industry and later ventured into politics. He always exercised caution to avoid misspeaking, often relying on carefully crafted statements and heavily depending on political advisors for strategic guidance. Coppins suggests that Mitt Romney's political tactics have been significantly shaped by the lessons learned from the errors in his father's political pursuits.

Other Perspectives

• The assertion that the "brainwashing" comment was the pivotal point in George Romney's campaign does not account for the possibility that his candidacy might have faced insurmountable challenges regardless of that particular statement.
• Romney's cautious approach in politics suggests that while he admires his father's courage, he may also value prudence and the ability to avoid controversy more highly.
• Romney's emphasis on avoiding errors could make him overly reliant on advisors and consultants, possibly diluting his own voice and perspectives in the political discourse.
• While emphasizing a uniform message and adhering to party lines may suggest discipline and unity, it could also be seen as a lack of flexibility and responsiveness to changing circumstances or new information.
• Others might suggest that the focus on image crafting could overshadow the importance of substantive policy positions and the ability to respond adaptively to unexpected challenges.
• Over-reliance on crafted statements and advisors may lead to perceptions of inauthenticity among voters who value spontaneity and sincerity.

He adopted a philosophy centered on responsibility and serving the community.

Romney's dedication to serving the public and his robust moral guidance are deeply rooted in the inspiration he drew from his father. During his formative years, Romney took note of George's commitment to enhancing their local community, a dedication that was apparent in his capacities as both a business leader and governor, as well as in their shared devotion to the tenets of their Mormon faith. Mitt Romney held a strong belief that those with wealth and influence have a responsibility to make a positive difference in the lives of others.

Coppins explores how this ethic has consistently manifested throughout Romney's career. He underscored his decision to leave a lucrative career in business to lead the 2002 Winter Olympics, which were plagued by scandal, and his steadfast dedication to rehabilitating the event's integrity and stability in Salt Lake City. During his tenure as Massachusetts governor, Romney was committed to combating poverty and bolstering programs designed to provide social assistance. The writer emphasizes Romney's view that standing against Trump was a vital moral decision to protect the principles of democracy, despite the potential risk to his career in politics.

Other Perspectives

• Serving the community is a broad concept, and Romney's specific actions to fulfill this philosophy may not address systemic issues or might prioritize certain community interests over others, which could be seen as selective service.
• Inspiration is subjective, and though Romney was inspired by his father, others in similar positions may find inspiration from a variety of sources, including their own personal experiences and the influence of other community leaders or historical figures.
• Wealth and influence do not inherently impose a moral obligation to act; individuals may believe in self-determination and personal choice over a sense of duty to others.
• The decision to take on the challenge of the 2002 Winter Olympics could be viewed as an opportunity for Romney to demonstrate leadership and crisis management skills on a public stage, which could benefit his future political ambitions.
• During Romney's tenure, some specific social programs faced budget cuts, which could be seen as at odds with the idea of enhancing social assistance programs, even if the overall goal was to combat poverty.
• Others could argue that standing against a figure within one's own party could be seen as creating division, which could be counterproductive to the unity necessary for a strong democracy.

Throughout his life in politics and personal endeavors, Romney has consistently made decisions that were steered by a core principle.

The significant impact of family guidance in shaping Romney's convictions and direction in life.

Coppins underscores the significant impact that familial values had in shaping both the personal choices and political stances of Romney. The book emphasizes the deep bond Romney shares with his wife, Ann, and the considerable impact she has on his life. The author meticulously outlines the foundation of their alliance and the challenges they conquered together, emphasizing Ann's struggle with multiple sclerosis and portraying her as a steadfast source of support and inspiration for Romney throughout his personal and career-related highs and lows.

Romney's unwavering commitment to his family has been a fundamental influence on his life, significantly impacting his decisions. Romney consistently prioritized his family life, ensuring his involvement despite the extensive demands of his career in the private sector and his frequent travels for work, including times when he was actively engaged in political pursuits. The author emphasizes Romney's steadfast dedication to his faith, highlighting the enduring significance of familial connections and the crucial role of raising children. reinforces this belief system.

Practical Tips

• Create a "values vision board" that represents the familial values you cherish and aspire to live by. This can be a collage of images, quotes, and symbols that resonate with your family's ethos. Place it somewhere you'll see daily as a reminder of the principles you want to guide your actions. If your family values education, you might include pictures of books, graduation caps, or quotes about lifelong learning.
• Volunteer together for a cause you both care about to strengthen your bond through shared values and teamwork. This could involve anything from helping out at a local food bank to participating in a community clean-up. The key is to choose an activity that resonates with both of you, creating a sense of unity and purpose in your relationship.
• Start a personal blog or social media page sharing stories of resilience and hope from your own life or from people you know who have overcome adversity. This can inspire others who are facing difficult situations. You don't need to be a professional writer; just share genuine experiences and thoughts that highlight the strength found in struggles.
• Establish a "Family Council" where you discuss significant upcoming decisions with your family members to gain their perspectives and insights. This can be a regular monthly meeting where you present the choices you're facing and actively seek their input, ensuring that your decisions are in harmony with your family's welfare and principles.

Cultivating a robust work ethic alongside a deep-rooted sense of accountability.

Coppins portrays Romney as a person whose unwavering commitment to hard work and independence was profoundly influenced by his disciplined childhood and the principles of his Mormon beliefs. The author ascribes Romney's characteristics to the influential early years when he witnessed his parents' dedication to hard work and their emphasis on instilling these values in their children. During the summer months, Romney dedicated his time to manual labor, which included building projects, maintaining landscapes, and working night shifts at the Chrysler plant. The writer posits that these pivotal moments in his life cultivated within Romney a robust discipline and a respect for the value of labor.

Coppins implies that Romney's unparalleled commitment and adeptness at coordination played a crucial role in his ability to outshine peers in academic and career accomplishments. Success was attainable solely by this particular strategy. He documents Romney's relentless pursuit of excellence while at Harvard Business School, his tireless commitment in consulting roles, and his meticulous focus on the details of his work, which was evident in his roles at Bain as well as in his leadership of the Olympic Games in Salt Lake City.

Other Perspectives

• The emphasis on hard work and independence might overshadow other important values such as collaboration, empathy, and social responsibility, which are also crucial for personal and professional success.
• Working night shifts at the Chrysler plant is a specific example that may not be generalizable to the broader population, as it reflects a particular opportunity that may have been available to Romney due to his circumstances, rather than a universal option for young people seeking to develop a strong work ethic.
• The idea that manual labor inherently cultivates discipline and respect for labor could be seen as a romanticized view that doesn't account for individuals who may have had similar experiences but did not develop the same attributes to the same extent.
• Commitment and coordination skills are important, but they are not the only factors that contribute to academic and career success; intelligence, opportunity, and networking also play significant roles.
• Success at Bain and in leading the Olympic Games could be critiqued from the perspective of the outcomes of Bain's investment strategies on employees and companies involved, or the controversies surrounding the financing and impact of the Olympic Games on Salt Lake City.

Balancing religious beliefs alongside political practicality

Coppins highlights the conflict between Romney's firm beliefs rooted in Mormonism and the realities of the political landscape, demonstrating how this tension influenced his policy-making process and strategies during electoral campaigns. During his 1994 Senate run, Romney, a staunch supporter of the right to life and opponent of abortion, encountered considerable pressure to soften his stance in order to appeal to the Massachusetts electorate.

Romney's pragmatic problem-solving methods typically led to favorable outcomes, yet they also made him vulnerable to accusations of being inconsistent, as they were advantageous as well as a source of dispute. The book delves into how Romney's religious beliefs were interwoven with his evolving positions on issues like gay rights and healthcare, leading to decisions that caused some voters to question his genuineness, while others praised his flexibility. Romney consistently employed a methodical strategy in his political pursuits, always in search of what appeared to be the most logical solutions.

Practical Tips

• Volunteer for a role that requires ethical decision-making, such as serving on a committee for a local non-profit or participating in a community advisory board. This hands-on experience will give you insight into how values and ethics play out in real-world scenarios, and how to reconcile personal beliefs with the collective good or organizational goals.
• You can evaluate your own beliefs by writing a personal stance essay on a controversial topic. Start by choosing a subject you feel strongly about, research different perspectives, and then articulate your position in a written essay. This exercise will help you understand the complexity of your beliefs and how external pressures might influence you to change them.
• Develop a habit tracker to maintain discipline in your daily routine. Choose three habits you want to establish that align with your goals, such as reading for 30 minutes, exercising for 20 minutes, or practicing a language for 15 minutes daily. Create a simple grid on paper or a digital app where you can check off each habit every day. Tracking your consistency will help you apply a methodical approach to personal development.

Mitt Romney found solace and a sense of privacy in his religious convictions.

He found comfort and direction through his faith in the teachings of the Mormon Church.

During the turbulent periods of his political career, Romney found comfort and direction by embracing the principles of his religious beliefs, participating in prayer, observing the established ceremonies of his church, and drawing wisdom from the doctrines of Mormon scripture. The author illuminates Romney's journey in the business and political realms, drawing on perspectives derived from his personal diary, which reveal how his faith provided him with comprehension, discernment, and resilience.

The foundational values imparted to Mitt Romney through scriptural lessons and the heritage of his forebears who belonged to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints significantly shaped his life, reflecting in his consistent ethical conduct across all areas, from his commitment to his family, to his honest dealings in business, and his continuous service to both the community and his church. The author also notes that this reliance on religious guidance did not necessarily translate to unwavering political stances or consistent policy positions.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal mission statement that reflects your core beliefs and use it to navigate challenging situations. This can serve as a compass, much like religious teachings might for a believer. Start by listing out your core values, then draft a statement that encapsulates your life's purpose and how you intend to live by your values. Refer to this statement when faced with difficult choices.
• Create a "values affirmation" routine where you start each day by affirming your commitment to your beliefs. This could be through meditation, journaling, or even a set of affirmations that you repeat to yourself. For instance, if community service is important to you, you might start your day by affirming, "Today, I will find an opportunity to serve others."
• Integrate mindfulness techniques into your prayer or religious practice to enhance your focus and connection. Before starting your prayer or attending a ceremony, take a few minutes to practice deep breathing or a short meditation. This can help you enter a more contemplative state, making the experience more meaningful and personal.
• Create a personal wisdom journal where you document insights and lessons learned from various sources. This could include not only spiritual or cultural texts but also life experiences, advice from mentors, or observations from nature. Regularly review your journal to identify recurring themes or principles that seem particularly relevant to your life. Use these insights as a compass for making tough decisions or setting new goals.
• Engage in a "discernment dialogue" with a trusted friend or mentor once a month. Discuss situations where you felt your faith provided insight or helped you make a tough decision. This conversation can help you articulate and understand the role of your beliefs in everyday life. You might talk about how your faith influenced your approach to resolving a family conflict, providing a fresh perspective on the issue.
• Explore your own heritage to understand how it shapes your values by creating a family tree that includes not just names and dates but also stories, traditions, and beliefs from your ancestors. This can give you insight into the cultural and spiritual influences that have shaped your own life, similar to how scriptural lessons and heritage influenced Mitt Romney. For example, if you discover that your great-grandparents were known for their generosity, consider how that trait might have been passed down to you and how you can continue to cultivate it.
• Engage in a monthly "values audit" where you review your actions and commitments to ensure they match your values. This could involve looking at your calendar and bank statements to see if your time and money are being spent in ways that reflect your values. If you value learning, check if you've dedicated time or resources to education or personal development.
• Create a 'community contribution jar' at home, where you and your family can drop ideas for service activities or small donations each week. This tangible reminder can encourage regular community service and charitable acts, turning good intentions into consistent actions.
• Create a personal "belief map" where you chart out your core beliefs and values on one side and your recent actions and decisions on the other. Draw lines to connect how each belief influences specific actions. This visual representation can help you see where your actions might not align with your beliefs, prompting you to consider adjustments for greater alignment.

Navigating the diverse anticipations of his audience while firmly upholding his religious beliefs.

Coppins emphasizes the difficulties Romney encountered as he strove to remain true to his Mormon faith while navigating the demands of a predominantly non-Mormon voting public, who often regarded his religious convictions with distrust and hostility, but he steadfastly refused to disavow his faith to achieve political advantage. In the 2008 presidential campaign, Romney faced rigorous examination of his commitment to the Mormon religion, and despite his efforts to depict his church as aligned with conventional Christian doctrines, he still faced disapproval from some conservative evangelicals who viewed Mormonism as a cult.

The author details Romney's decision in the 2008 primary campaign to address the Mormon elephant in the room head-on with his "Faith in America" speech, where he spoke about the importance of religious freedom and insisted he would never apologize for his beliefs. Despite advice from his inner circle to downplay or portray his faith as simply traditional practices, he consistently and publicly declared his adherence to the principles of his faith. Coppins implies that during this critical moment, the commitment of Romney to remain true to his own identity and his unwavering adherence to his faith was evident, even though it might have been politically advantageous to behave otherwise. The speech is seen by some as a key event in narrowing the divide between Mormons and the broader American public, and it is identified by the author as a significant point in Romney's personal journey of growth.

Context

• Before his presidential campaigns, Romney served as the governor of Massachusetts, a state with a small Mormon population. His political career required him to navigate religious and cultural differences, which became more pronounced on the national stage.
• Mormonism, officially known as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, is a religious movement founded in the early 19th century in the United States. Its distinct beliefs and practices have often been misunderstood or viewed with skepticism by the broader American public, particularly among certain Christian groups who do not consider it part of mainstream Christianity.
• Many conservative evangelicals adhere strictly to traditional Christian doctrines and often view any deviation, such as the additional scriptures and unique beliefs of Mormonism, as heretical or cult-like.
• While the speech was intended to alleviate concerns, it did not fully resolve the issue for all voters. Romney eventually lost the Republican nomination to John McCain, but the speech was seen as a defining moment in his political career.
• The concept of religious freedom is enshrined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the government from establishing a religion and protects individuals' rights to practice their faith freely. This principle has been a cornerstone of American democracy, allowing diverse religious practices to coexist.
• This speech was a strategic move to address concerns about Romney's faith directly, aiming to reassure voters of his commitment to religious freedom and the separation of church and state.

Romney's political career has been significantly shaped by his religious convictions.

Mitt Romney's political strategies have been clearly shaped by his religious upbringing in the Mormon faith, as Coppins indicates. His faith deeply shaped his admirable leadership qualities as well as the most evident shortcomings in his pursuit of a political position. The author suggests that Romney's firmly held spiritual convictions cultivated a profound sense of duty, an exhaustive methodology in his professional endeavors, and an unwavering commitment to integrity, which collectively contributed substantially to his success in politics. His ancestry, molded by the hardships of ancestors who endured relocation and crossed vast stretches of the United States to establish a community in Utah, was instrumental in his willingness to break ranks with the Republican Party by denouncing Trump and exploring common ground with Democrats.

Coppins suggests that Romney's adherence to the unique tenets and rituals of his faith often resulted in perceptions of him as distant and difficult to connect with, particularly among voters outside of Utah, which limited his ability to appeal to a broader electorate. He communicated the challenges he faced in sharing his religious beliefs with a skeptical public, alongside the media's continuous focus on the more peculiar aspects of Mormonism. The author emphasizes that Romney's adherence to his faith often erected obstacles throughout his bids for the presidency, which more often alienated voters than drew them in.

Other Perspectives

• Leadership qualities such as a sense of duty, methodical approach, and commitment to integrity can be developed independently of religious convictions, and attributing these traits solely to Romney's faith may overlook other formative experiences and influences in his life, such as his business background or family upbringing.
• The idea that an exhaustive methodology is a direct outcome of religious conviction could be challenged by pointing out that such an approach to work and problem-solving can also stem from a person's innate personality traits, educational background, or professional training.
• The influence of a politician's ancestry on their political decisions can be overstated, as it may not reflect the current needs and demands of their constituents, who expect decisions to be based on present-day realities rather than historical influences.
• Seeking common ground with Democrats does not necessarily mean a wholesale endorsement of their policies; it could simply be an attempt to foster a more collaborative political environment.
• The media's focus on the peculiar aspects of any religion or belief system could be argued as an exercise of freedom of the press and public interest, rather than a targeted hindrance to a political figure's appeal.

Mitt Romney's dedication to upholding ethical standards and fostering bipartisan cooperation.

He consistently made decisions based on his ethical beliefs, giving no regard to the possible repercussions in the political arena.

The fallout from the vote on impeachment

Coppins portrays the moment when Romney decided to convict Donald Trump during the 2020 impeachment as a critical turning point in his senatorial career, demonstrating a firm commitment to maintaining moral principles despite the possibility of significant political fallout. The writer delves deeply into the repercussions Romney faced due to his choice, analyzing evidence presented during the House impeachment proceedings and consulting authorities on constitutional law as well as ecclesiastical leaders for their perspectives.

Romney encountered substantial reproach from fellow Republicans, who deemed his decision to convict an act of treachery, faced the possibility of punitive actions by GOP factions within Utah, and withstood ongoing censure from Trump. Romney steadfastly prioritized his constitutional duties over the possibility of political fallout. This occurrence underscored the widening divisions within the GOP and the diminishing room for individuals hesitant to adopt the ideology linked to the previous president.

Practical Tips

• Create a "decision tree" for future complex choices to visualize potential outcomes and paths. Draw a simple diagram with branches representing different options and possible consequences. This exercise can improve your ability to anticipate the long-term effects of your decisions.
• Practice saying no to small temptations in everyday life to build moral resilience. This could be as simple as not taking more than your fair share of samples at a grocery store or returning incorrect change given to you by a cashier. These small acts reinforce your commitment to your principles and prepare you for larger ethical dilemmas. Over time, you'll find it becomes easier to maintain your moral stance in more significant matters.
• Create a support group with friends or colleagues where you can share experiences of standing by tough decisions and offer each other constructive feedback. This group can meet monthly to discuss challenges and share strategies for dealing with criticism. For instance, after sharing a story of sticking to a controversial decision at work, group members can provide insights on how they've handled similar situations or offer encouragement.
• Develop a personal contingency plan for potential setbacks in your career or personal projects. Think about the worst-case scenarios, like losing a job or facing opposition in a community project, and outline steps you would take to mitigate these risks. This might include diversifying your skill set, creating a financial safety net, or building a support network that you can rely on for advice and assistance.
• Develop a personal resilience mantra to reinforce your ability to withstand criticism. Create a short, positive statement that resonates with your values and repeat it during challenging times to maintain focus and composure. For example, if you face criticism at work, your mantra could be "I grow with every challenge," helping you to internalize a growth mindset rather than feeling defeated.
• Create a "Responsibility Charter" for yourself, outlining the duties you hold as paramount in different areas of your life, such as family, work, and community. Refer to this charter when faced with decisions that could lead to personal gain at the expense of these duties. For instance, you might decide to decline a lucrative opportunity that would require compromising time with your family, which your charter defines as a primary responsibility.
• You can analyze political trends by creating a personal journal to track political events and your reactions to them. Start by noting down significant political events each week and your thoughts on how they reflect the state of political parties or ideologies you're interested in. This will help you understand the dynamics and divisions within these groups over time.
• Volunteer for a local organization that works across ideological lines. Engaging in community service can expose you to a variety of viewpoints and demonstrate the importance of cooperation despite differing beliefs. This experience can provide practical insight into how ideology influences community dynamics and individual opportunities.

Trump faced criticism for his behavior and remarks.

Coppins details numerous occasions where Romney openly criticized the president's divisive rhetoric and unacceptable conduct throughout the Trump era. He condemned Trump's praise for white nationalists in Charlottesville, spoke out against his attacks on the free press, and called out his efforts to subvert democratic norms. The writer highlights how Romney did not hesitate to express his disagreement with Trump, even at the risk of alienating other members of the Republican Party and drawing hostility from Trump supporters and right-leaning media.

Coppins also details Romney's efforts to uphold the ethical standards he felt were eroding within the GOP throughout Trump's tenure. He challenged his Republican colleagues on their willingness to embrace the previous leader's provocative language and their reluctance to hold him accountable for his actions. The author suggests that Romney's stance against Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election outcome intensified discord within the Republican ranks, and his vocal disapproval of Trump on January 6, 2021, cemented his role as a resolute dissenter.

Context

• In August 2017, a "Unite the Right" rally took place in Charlottesville, Virginia, where white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and other far-right groups gathered. The event turned violent, resulting in the death of a counter-protester, Heather Heyer.
• On this date, a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to prevent Congress from certifying Joe Biden's electoral victory. This event is often cited as a direct attack on democratic processes and norms.
• The 2020 U.S. presidential election resulted in Joe Biden defeating incumbent President Donald Trump. Despite numerous claims of widespread voter fraud by Trump and his allies, these allegations were consistently debunked by courts and election officials.

Other Perspectives

• Some may argue that Trump's critiques of the press were often directed at specific outlets or stories that he considered to be unfair or inaccurate, rather than a blanket condemnation of the free press as an institution.
• The concept of accountability is subjective, and GOP colleagues might believe that they are holding Trump accountable in ways that do not involve public criticism or confrontation.
• Others could argue that dissent is not solely defined by public disapproval but also by actions taken, and without significant policy opposition, the role of a dissenter is not fully realized.

Dissent from Romney had repercussions that impacted him on both a personal and professional level.

Coppins depicts the array of personal and political challenges Romney faced due to his stance against Trump's ideology. He withstood relentless scrutiny, was branded a traitor by media outlets on the right, and his safety was jeopardized. The author describes the steps Romney took to protect his family and himself, while resolutely opposing behaviors he deemed dangerous and at odds with the principles of democracy. The criticism carried more weight and posed a significant threat to his political ambitions because it came from Romney, an individual within Trump's political sphere.

The author portrays Romney's internal conflict as he navigated the growing rift within the Republican Party. He was disenchanted when his peers, although united in their disdain for Trump, yielded to political convenience and endorsed the actions of former commanders-in-chief. In subsequent conversations, Romney expressed feelings of isolation and desertion following his decision to publicly confront Trump, remarking on how several friends and colleagues had completely shunned him.

Context

• Being labeled a traitor by influential media can severely affect a politician's reputation and career, especially in a polarized political environment where media narratives strongly influence voter opinions.
• Public figures who oppose powerful political leaders often receive threats, necessitating increased security measures. This can include hiring private security, installing surveillance systems, or coordinating with law enforcement for protection.
• Those who opposed Trump within the party often faced backlash, including potential primary challenges, loss of committee positions, and diminished influence within the party.
• Romney was the first senator in U.S. history to vote to convict a president from his own party during an impeachment trial, highlighting the gravity of his opposition.

Building cooperative relationships between parties to achieve common goals.

The ten-member coalition's involvement in the legislative measures concerning public works.

Coppins portrays Romney's work with a group of ten senators from both parties on the infrastructure bill as evidence of his commitment to bipartisan cooperation, emphasizing his ability to negotiate with Democrats who are generally seen as more liberal than he is. The writer emphasizes the pivotal part played by the senator during the negotiation process, noting his deep understanding of the issues involved and his willingness to participate in discussions and offer compromises.

Coppins highlights the internal strife Romney faced from certain members of his political circle who criticized him for contemplating collaboration with Democrats during the Biden administration, viewing such actions as a betrayal. Romney upheld his backing for the infrastructure legislation, highlighting its capacity to achieve important national goals and to demonstrate that a polarized legislature can still reach consensus, despite possible political repercussions.

Other Perspectives

• The focus on Romney's role may overshadow the contributions of the other nine senators, suggesting a skewed representation of the collaborative effort.
• The effectiveness of Romney's negotiations could be questioned if the resulting bill did not adequately address the needs of his constituents or if it favored Democratic priorities over Republican ones.
• Romney's support for the infrastructure legislation, while commendable for its bipartisanship, may not align with the fiscal conservatism that some of his constituents expect, potentially leading to criticism for increased government spending.
• The benefits of infrastructure spending may not be evenly distributed across the country, leading to regional disparities that could exacerbate existing inequalities rather than addressing national goals as a whole.
• The consensus reached on the infrastructure bill might have involved significant compromises that diluted the effectiveness of the legislation, raising questions about the quality of consensus.

Seeking agreement on matters such as healthcare and environmental policy

Coppins details various instances in which Romney showed a willingness to cross partisan divides, working with progressive legislators on important projects that prioritized tangible outcomes rather than rigid loyalty to ideological stances. Romney persisted in supporting initiatives that would broaden healthcare availability, suggesting improvements to the Affordable Care Act throughout Trump's term, which resulted in disapproval from conservative groups because of his association with a policy predominantly credited to the Democratic Party.

The author highlights that Romney is ready to depart from his party's usual position on climate change, championing initiatives to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy sources, and underscoring the necessity of addressing the climate crisis across party lines. Romney stood out from many in the GOP due to his pragmatic approach to issues, which made him seem especially sensible to those who view political deadlock as an obstacle to progress.

Other Perspectives

• Focusing on tangible outcomes might lead to short-term gains but could potentially overlook the long-term implications of policy decisions that require a more ideologically consistent approach.
• His approach to climate change might not represent a departure but rather an expansion of the GOP's traditional values, such as conservation and stewardship, into modern environmental issues.
• While transitioning to renewable energy is a positive step, it is also important to consider the environmental impact of manufacturing, installing, and maintaining renewable energy infrastructure, which may not be fully mitigated by Romney's initiatives.
• It could be argued that the emphasis on bipartisanship in climate policy may inadvertently legitimize climate denialism or delay by giving equal weight to positions that are not supported by scientific consensus.
• The effectiveness of crossing party lines is debatable; some might argue that while it appears to be a sensible way to overcome deadlock, it does not always result in substantial progress or may lead to watered-down policies that fail to satisfy either party.

Challenges of Maintaining Bipartisanship in a Polarized Era

Coppins depicts the considerable difficulty Romney has encountered in his efforts to uphold bipartisanship during a time when politics are sharply divided by extreme ideologies. The issue is only exacerbated by the relentless stream of news that focuses on discord and indignation, coupled with the profound influence of social media that promotes incendiary rhetoric and undermines temperate conversation. The difficulty for those striving to shake up the established order increases as they attempt to draw attention and accomplish their objectives. Numerous individuals from various political backgrounds view the act of seeking compromise with adversaries as equivalent to betrayal.

Romney felt deeply frustrated by the Senate's indifference and unwillingness to collaborate on legislative matters. His peers often appeared more interested in orchestrating media events and addressing vacant chambers, with their main concern being the forthcoming election instead of sincerely striving to understand problems or devise resolutions. The leader of the party certainly played no positive role in upholding the remaining civic norms and traditions of American democracy. Coppins implies that the concept of finding mutual solutions and sincerely engaging in discussions with opposing parties may just be remnants of the twentieth century.

Practical Tips

• You can foster bipartisanship in your community by starting a book club focused on political literature from multiple perspectives. Invite members from different political affiliations and encourage open, respectful discussions on the themes and ideas presented in the books. This can help participants understand various viewpoints and find common ground.
• You can diversify your news sources to include independent and bipartisan media outlets. By actively seeking out news platforms that prioritize bipartisan reporting and constructive dialogue, you can reshape your media consumption habits. For example, subscribe to newsletters from organizations that are known for their non-partisan approach or use apps that aggregate news from multiple sources to get a balanced view.
• Develop a personal "Reflection Before Reaction" rule when engaging with social media content. Before responding to a post or comment, take a moment to reflect on the potential impact of your words. Consider writing your response in a separate document and revisiting it after a short break to ensure it contributes to a constructive dialogue rather than escalating tensions.
• Create a feedback loop with someone you trust to discuss outcomes of compromises you've made. After a situation where you've had to find a middle ground, debrief with this person about the process and the result. This can help you reflect on whether you stayed true to your values and what you might do differently next time. If you compromised on a work project's deadline to accommodate a team member's request, discuss whether the outcome was beneficial to the project's quality and your work-life balance.
• Create a mini-grant program to fund small community projects that require cross-collaboration. By providing financial support for initiatives that need multiple parties to work together, you encourage a spirit of cooperation at the grassroots level. This can be as simple as setting up a fund with friends and neighbors to support projects like community gardens or neighborhood clean-ups, which require collective effort and decision-making.
• You can foster civic engagement by volunteering as a moderator for local town hall meetings or community forums. By taking on this role, you'll help ensure that discussions remain respectful and adhere to community norms, which can be a hands-on way to uphold civic traditions and encourage others to do the same.
• Engage in solo brainstorming sessions to develop solutions to personal challenges without external input. Set aside time to think deeply about a problem you're facing and come up with a variety of solutions on your own. This practice can help you become more self-reliant in problem-solving and may lead to innovative solutions that you might not have considered in a group setting.

Mitt Romney reflected on the changes within the Republican Party and the wider shifts in the political climate of the United States.

Observing the ascent of Trump and its consequences.

Romney's efforts to obstruct Trump's rise to the party's nomination.

Coppins highlights how Romney was profoundly dismayed and disgusted as he witnessed Trump secure the Republican nomination in 2016. Initially, many observers considered Trump's run for the presidency to be nothing more than a maneuver to maintain his prominence in the public eye. Romney embarked on a valiant but ultimately unsuccessful effort to counter the growing popularity of Trump, recognizing the threat that Trump's personality and ideas posed to the democratic structure of the United States.

His March 2016 speech at the University of Utah represented a daring political strategy, where he denounced Trump's flawed personality and policies, and offered strategic advice to fellow Republicans on how to prevent a perilous figure from becoming the party's leading representative. Romney's response, however, was not immediate. As the Republican Party fully adopted Trump's ideology, Romney was pushed to the periphery.

Other Perspectives

• The use of the words "profoundly dismayed and disgusted" could be interpreted as an emotional response, which might not fully encapsulate the strategic and political calculations that a seasoned politician like Romney would be expected to make.
• Trump's history of political commentary and previous flirtation with running for office could indicate a genuine interest in political leadership rather than merely a desire to stay in the public eye.
• The success of Trump's candidacy could be interpreted as an expression of the democratic process, with his ideas and personality resonating with a substantial portion of the electorate.
• The advice could be seen as undemocratic if it aimed to subvert the will of the primary voters who supported Trump.
• Romney's response, while not immediate, could be seen as timely given the need for careful consideration and strategy in political opposition.
• The idea that the Republican Party fully adopted Trump's ideology could be contested, as there have been instances and policy areas where prominent Republican figures and lawmakers have openly disagreed with Trump's positions.

Romney's growing disillusionment intensified as the Republican Party embraced Trump's ideology.

Coppins adeptly illustrates Romney's growing disenchantment while he watched the Republican Party abandon its fundamental conservative principles, shift toward populist grievances, and partake in actions that erode the bedrock tenets of American democracy. Romney sought to maintain his integrity and principles as he worked with President-elect Trump, but he recognized a boundary to how much he could adapt to Trump's unconventional and potentially hazardous tactics.

Coppins reveals how Romney evolved from a prototypical representative of the Republican hierarchy to a figure on the periphery of the same party that once chose him as their candidate for the presidency. The split, as described by Coppins, signifies a notable shift in the outlook of American conservatives, with the Republican Party increasingly adopting a stance that opposes the pragmatic, moderate, and conventional conservative principles represented by Romney.

Other Perspectives

• The idea of disillusionment assumes that the party's core principles were static, whereas political parties often undergo ideological shifts over time in response to various factors.
• The party's shift toward populist grievances could be argued as a response to the perceived failures of established conservative policies to address the concerns of ordinary Americans, thus adapting to the needs and wants of the electorate.
• The perception of a shift may be overemphasized; while certain populist elements have gained prominence, the core conservative values remain intact within the party's platform.
• The term "bedrock tenets of American democracy" can be subjective, and different political ideologies can have varying interpretations of these principles.
• The concept of maintaining integrity and principles could be argued as being at odds with the nature of politics, where compromise is often necessary to achieve legislative progress.
• The idea of a shift might be challenged by the cyclical nature of politics, where parties often swing between different ideologies over time, suggesting that the current state may be part of a larger ebb and flow rather than a permanent transformation.

Concerns about the trajectory of the Republican Party.

The author portrays Mitt Romney's increasing unease about the trajectory of the Republican Party. The perils faced by the Republican Party are underscored by its engagement with strategies that capitalize on the discontent of white Americans, its disregard for the foundational principles and frameworks that sustain democratic governance, and its reliance on the divisive rhetoric linked to Trump's ideology. Romney believes that the current trend towards increasingly radical conservative stances might lead to adverse outcomes, possibly alienating those who favor conventional conservative ideals and threatening the foundational tenets of American democracy.

The publication titled "Romney" offers an in-depth examination of the transformations occurring within the Republican Party and its base, particularly focusing on the period following the 2012 elections, during which Coppins expresses considerable doubt about the direction of US politics in light of these changes. The author depicts how the GOP's response to Trump's loss, involving endorsement of his baseless allegations of voting fraud and leading up to the violent breach of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, forced Romney to denounce the behavior of his party's leaders as deplorable.

Other Perspectives

• The Republican Party's strategies are aimed at addressing the concerns of all Americans, not just white Americans, by focusing on broad issues such as the economy, national security, and personal freedoms that affect citizens across the demographic spectrum.
• It is argued that the Republican Party's approach to governance and policy-making is grounded in a different interpretation of democratic principles, such as an emphasis on states' rights and individual liberties, rather than a disregard for democracy.
• Alienation of some may lead to the mobilization and greater political engagement of others who support the radical stances, potentially leading to a more active and passionate base.
• Others might suggest that the alarm over radical conservative stances is overstated and that the political process allows for the eventual moderation of extreme positions through elections and legislative checks and balances.
• The GOP's actions could be seen as an exercise of their legal right to challenge election results and ensure that all votes were counted accurately, which is a standard procedure in many democratic elections.
• Some Republican leaders openly acknowledged Biden's victory and opposed efforts to overturn the election, indicating a divide within the party rather than a unified response that led to the violence.

The erosion of democratic values and the impending threat of autocratic governance.

Romney is profoundly disturbed by the Republican Party's readiness to accept untruths regarding the results of elections.

Coppins portrays Romney's growing unease with the Republican Party's endorsement and propagation of election-related falsehoods as a key aspect of his political journey post-2012. The author emphasizes that Romney's thorough analysis of authoritarian regimes abroad has equipped him with an understanding of the perilous impact that claims of election fraud, regardless of their origin, can have by undermining the foundational elements of democracy and reducing confidence in governmental institutions. Coppins depicts Romney as feeling an obligation to confront the president openly and hold him accountable for his actions, regardless of the possible political fallout.

He offers several examples of Romney's firm stance against the Republican Party's embrace of these election untruths, arguing that such behavior is a serious risk to the country's destiny. In 2022, Romney strongly denounced the Republican National Committee's reprimand of Adam Kinzinger and Liz Cheney for their roles in what was characterized as a Democrat-led probe into ordinary people engaged in legitimate political discourse, especially regarding their examination of the January 6 Capitol event, calling the condemnation misguided and remarkable. He argued that failing to bring the orchestrators of the January 6th turmoil to justice would only embolden further efforts to undermine the pillars of democracy. Coppins suggests that these moments reflect Romney's deep dedication to democratic values and his willingness to risk his own political career to uphold these principles.

Other Perspectives

• The Republican Party's stance on election integrity could be interpreted as a call for stricter voter ID laws and election security measures, rather than an outright endorsement of falsehoods.
• Romney's analysis of authoritarian regimes abroad might not necessarily provide a comprehensive understanding of the unique political and electoral context within the United States, which has its own set of historical, legal, and cultural factors influencing perceptions of election integrity.
• Open confrontation with the president could be seen as a political move that alienates Romney from his party and constituents who support the president, potentially reducing his influence.
• Others in the party might contend that there are more constructive ways to address concerns about election integrity without publicly breaking ranks.
• The RNC's reprimand of Kinzinger and Cheney could be viewed as an internal party discipline matter, and Romney's public criticism might be seen as interference in party governance.
• The assertion that justice must be served to prevent future turmoil presupposes that legal consequences for the January 6th events would deter similar actions in the future, but others might contend that the root causes of such unrest are complex and require broader societal engagement beyond legal repercussions.
• The perception of risk to one's political career is subjective, and what may seem like a risk to some may be viewed by others as a strategic move to gain favor with certain voter demographics.

The polarizing language and actions that stem from Trump.

Coppins describes Romney's increasing discomfort as he witnessed the impact of Trump's rhetoric and behavior on America's traditional political norms. The author details Mitt Romney's view that the former president's disparagement of press independence, efforts to erode democratic principles, and employment of language that fueled racial and ethnic tensions posed threats to the core principles of the country and contributed to the deterioration of the quality of public discourse.

Coppins also illustrates how this behavior has permeated among Trump's supporters, highlighting their increasing hostility and sporadic acts of violence, their willingness to embrace baseless theories that erode confidence in political institutions and verifiable facts, and the proliferation of far-right convictions that have made prejudiced groups and bigoted views more visible to the general populace. Before the January 6 disturbance, Romney was met with confrontational actions by supporters of Trump at the Salt Lake City airport, and this antagonism persisted on a flight heading to Washington D.C., which was crowded with Trump's followers, exemplifying this type of behavior. Coppins implies that these occurrences highlight the delicate nature of democratic systems and the perilous circumstances that arise when political leaders exploit our basest impulses.

Practical Tips

• Engage in role-playing exercises with friends where one person adopts a political figure's communication style while others respond. This can help you experience firsthand how certain rhetoric can influence conversations and group dynamics.
• Create a personal rule to avoid using polarizing language in your daily conversations, opting instead for language that invites dialogue and understanding. Monitor your own speech for a month, noting instances where you could have chosen more inclusive or neutral terms, and reflect on how this affects your interactions.
• Create a personal "Media Mindfulness" diary where you track the sources and quality of information you consume for a week, noting any instances of biased or sensationalist language. This self-audit helps you become more aware of how media influences your speech and thoughts, guiding you to seek out more balanced and nuanced sources of information.
• Encourage critical thinking by sharing fact-checking resources with your social circle when controversial topics arise. This helps create an environment where claims are scrutinized, and evidence is valued, reducing the likelihood of hostility based on misinformation.
• Enhance your conflict resolution skills by role-playing potential confrontational scenarios. Find a partner willing to act out a situation where you're confronted with opposing views. After the role-play, discuss what strategies worked to de-escalate the tension and what could be improved. This exercise will prepare you for real-life confrontations by providing a safe space to experiment with different approaches.

Romney consistently upholds the principles of democracy.

The author's depiction underscores Romney's steadfast commitment to the principles of democracy, evident in both his actions and his speech. Even as the risk of political repercussions increased, he consistently expressed his disapproval of Trump's behaviors that undermined the electoral process and were harmful to the party's established norms and civic traditions. The author details multiple instances where Romney placed his principles above loyalty to his political party or personal gain, tackling what he perceives as the greatest threat to America's prosperity: illiberalism.

Coppins highlights the measures the former Massachusetts governor implemented to champion press freedom, categorically reject political radicalism and violence, and address his party's endorsement of unfounded election claims, signifying pivotal moments in his effort to steer the GOP firmly towards a commitment to democratic values. In his critique of individuals prioritizing party objectives over the country's welfare, he has consistently advocated for democratic values and the rule of law, doing so in various forums such as media dialogues, communal events, and during his involvement with legislative sessions.

Other Perspectives

• Romney's approach to certain policies may inadvertently support party lines, suggesting that the distinction between principle and party loyalty is not always clear-cut.
• Rejecting political radicalism and violence is a stance that most politicians claim to uphold, but the definition of political radicalism can be subjective, and some may argue that Romney's definition aligns too closely with his party's interests.
• Addressing unfounded election claims within his party is a complex task, and Romney's efforts, though well-intentioned, may not fully account for the diverse perspectives and motivations of other party members who support such claims.
• Advocating for democratic values and the rule of law does not necessarily equate to effective policy changes or legislative success, which are also important measures of a politician's commitment to democracy.
• Prioritizing party objectives does not necessarily conflict with the country's welfare; in some views, strong party leadership can be essential for enacting policies that benefit the nation.

Romney's dedication to upholding the principles and ideals of democratic governance.

Facing ethical dilemmas

Placing principles above loyalty to a political faction.

The decision by Romney to back Trump's conviction during his initial impeachment trial marked a pivotal moment in his senatorial career, showcasing his commitment to personal principles and the principles of democracy over strict party loyalty. The author emphasizes how Romney's reaction stood in contrast to that of other Republicans who, although they expressed concerns about Trump's behavior in private, publicly defended or endorsed his actions, often for political gain.

This choice, as Coppins notes, stemmed from Romney's deep-seated belief in the tenets of democracy, his resistance to Trump's authoritarian inclinations, and his willingness to accept the political repercussions of adhering to his values.

Other Perspectives

• The act of voting for Trump's conviction could be interpreted as aligning with another faction's principles, which might also be seen as a form of political loyalty, just not to his own party.
• The notion of political gain is complex and can be interpreted in various ways; some Republicans might have believed that supporting Trump was beneficial for the long-term goals of their party and the country, not just for personal advancement.
• The decision could also be criticized as not going far enough if it was not accompanied by other consistent actions to protect democratic principles beyond the impeachment trial.