PDF Summary:Poisoner in Chief, by Stephen Kinzer

In the early days of the Cold War, the CIA launched an audacious program—code-named MK-ULTRA—to develop techniques for mind control. Driven by a fear of falling behind enemy forces, the agency recruited Nazi scientists, tested psychoactive drugs like LSD, administered substances covertly to unknowing subjects, and explored extreme methods such as electroshock and sensory deprivation.

In his book Poisoner in Chief, Stephen Kinzer uncovers the dark history of MK-ULTRA and the CIA's relentless pursuit of mastering the human mind. Centered around the program's chief scientist Sidney Gottlieb, the book reveals the lengths the agency went to manipulate cognition and push the boundaries of psychological experimentation—often disregarding ethics entirely.

(continued)...

The CIA partnered with the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly to ensure a dedicated source of LSD was available while also blocking Sandoz from supplying the compound to the Soviet Union.

The CIA worked in partnership with the American pharmaceutical firm Eli Lilly to unlock the secrets behind the composition of LSD, initially created by Sandoz, to ensure they could harness its potential while preventing rival forces from accessing it. The book discloses that Eli Lilly benefited from substantial clandestine funding provided by the CIA, aimed at boosting the company's production of LSD exclusively for the Agency's use.

Context

• LSD, or lysergic acid diethylamide, was first synthesized by Albert Hofmann at Sandoz Laboratories in Switzerland in 1938. Its psychoactive properties were discovered in 1943, leading to interest from various intelligence agencies.
• The covert funding and production of LSD by Eli Lilly for the CIA raise questions about the ethical boundaries of government and corporate collaboration, especially in the context of secretive and potentially harmful experiments.
• The fear of LSD falling into Soviet hands was part of broader national security concerns about maintaining technological and scientific superiority over the Soviet Union.

Gottlieb played a role.

The author highlights Sidney Gottlieb's crucial role in the establishment of MK-ULTRA, the CIA's most audacious program aimed at behavior modification. In 1953, Gottlieb was tasked with exploring various techniques for mind control, and his position afforded him considerable independence, with his fascination with psychoactive substances, especially LSD, significantly shaping the course of the initiative. He divided the clandestine MK-ULTRA initiative into 149 separate endeavors, each focused on a specific compound, technique, or tactical approach, and managed research operations across three different continents.

Kinzer delves into the cunning tactics employed by Gottlieb to expand the CIA's endeavors in mental influence, which included funneling money through fictitious organizations and recruiting a famous magician to compile a guide on trickery for CIA agents to covertly disseminate LSD and various substances.

Gottlieb played a pivotal role in broadening the range of MK-ULTRA's operations.

Kinzer highlights the boundless inventiveness of Sidney Gottlieb, as demonstrated by the wide array of experiments conducted under MK-ULTRA, emphasizing his willingness to explore and trial any conceivable method that might result in controlling the human mind. Gottlieb encouraged researchers to investigate alternative techniques that did not rely on the unpredictable effects of LSD.

He initiated a sequence of trials aimed at discovering methods to modify consciousness and behavior through various techniques such as trance induction, electrotherapy, exposure to radiation, extreme stress, and the application of torture. The goal, as articulated by Stephen Kinzer, was to create a compound that would temporarily and benignly alter one's mental state without resulting in any detrimental consequences. Growing apprehension at the CIA, fueled by the mistaken belief that Soviet progress was outpacing their own, led to the implementation of increasingly extreme tactics.

Gottlieb's use of techniques beyond drugs, like hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and electroshock, to advance MK-ULTRA research

Stephen Kinzer delves into the range of techniques Gottlieb investigated, including the use of hypnotic states for mind control and the effects of sensory deprivation, which extended past the drug-based approaches in the MK-ULTRA experiments. Detainees were subjected to environments that were intentionally altered to cause vibrations or instability, rooms with modified proportions, the purposeful creation of anxiety, the provocation of intense fear or the exploitation of existing phobias, as well as exposure to severe temperature fluctuations, changes in moisture levels, and disorientation challenges. The facility was designed to ensure that no sound would escape. The experiments described by Kinzer were designed to weaken the psychological fortitude of the subjects, making them increasingly vulnerable to different forms of psychological influence and questioning techniques.

Kinzer details a distinct element of MK-ULTRA, wherein individuals, including those with mental health conditions, were confined to chairs typically used for electroconvulsive therapy and exposed to severe electrical shocks. Kinzer described a goal aimed at unsettling established cognitive routines, which would create an opportunity to implant new concepts or shape different patterns of behavior.

Context

• The experiments often lacked informed consent, with many subjects unaware they were part of a study. This raised significant ethical issues, leading to public outcry and eventual investigations.
• While hypnosis can alter perception and behavior to some extent, the scientific community largely views the idea of using it for absolute mind control as implausible and unsupported by evidence.
• Researchers were interested in understanding how the brain copes with a lack of sensory input and whether this state could be exploited to alter thought processes or behavior.
• The manipulation of environments was intended to break down a subject’s mental defenses, making them more susceptible to suggestion and control. This was part of a broader strategy to explore the limits of human endurance and psychological resilience.
• Soundproofing was a standard practice in covert operations to ensure that sensitive activities remained undetected by outsiders, including other government agencies or foreign entities.
• Many subjects experienced long-term psychological damage, and some experiments resulted in death, highlighting the program's disregard for human rights and safety.
• Many subjects of MK-ULTRA suffered long-term psychological and physical harm. The use of severe electrical shocks was part of broader efforts to break down individuals' mental states, often leading to lasting trauma.

John Mulholland wrote a manual that taught CIA agents how to discreetly dispense drugs and keep poisons from being discovered.

After Harry Houdini passed away, the CIA recruited John Mulholland, a respected magician, to teach their operatives the art of misdirection, sleight of hand, and the subtle ways of making objects disappear, convinced that these skills of illusion could provide the agency with novel and secretive ways to deliver substances. Mulholland, haunted by his own inability to serve in uniform during World War I and eager for a chance to demonstrate his patriotism, embraced this unusual assignment. Upon meeting Gottlieb in New York in 1953, Kinzer details the initiation of techniques for secretly infusing drugs into the drinks of unsuspecting individuals, hiding dangerous agents in cigarette packages, or stealthily injecting poisons into wine bottles through the cork.

Kinzer reveals that for each part of his manual, Mulholland received a payment of $3,000 from the CIA, and he primarily conducted training workshops in New York City, where CIA operatives sharpened their abilities using various instruments and "expendables" – likely individuals provided by George Hunter White, who may have been selected from a group of drug users or people with criminal records. Stephen Kinzer regards the guidebook as an indispensable tool for historians, providing essential instructions on executing specific tasks covertly and without detection. This book acts as a succinct guide for becoming proficient in the art of deception.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal safety kit that includes items designed to detect or deter tampering, such as tamper-evident stickers for personal belongings or a small flashlight to inspect drinks in low-light situations. Carrying these items can empower you to take proactive steps in ensuring your personal safety in various environments.
• Start a blog or podcast where you discuss historical events from the perspective of covert operations, drawing parallels between past events and current issues. This can help you and your audience appreciate the complexities of history and the impact of intelligence work on societal developments.
• Develop your ability to read body language by watching silent films and trying to interpret the plot and emotions of the characters without dialogue. This can improve your non-verbal communication analysis, a key aspect of deception and understanding hidden intentions.

The CIA conducted covert operations by secretly administering drugs to unsuspecting individuals.

Guided by Gottlieb, the team behind MK-ULTRA sought to develop methods enabling the covert administration of substances like LSD to people, in order to monitor their reactions and assess the potential military applications of these substances. Kinzer details a variety of trials, highlighting that participants were selected based on their belonging to groups considered less likely to object to unforeseen and bewildering events. They included unwitting patrons at White’s safe houses, partygoers in private homes, and even random people picked up in bars. The U.S. espionage organization meticulously crafted multiple levels of obfuscation, using intricate go-betweens that often masqueraded as non-existent organizations, to obscure the true sources of money for these experiments.

In New York, the "safe house" operated as a secret location where, during private moments, sex workers discreetly administered LSD to individuals as a component of espionage activities.

In his book, Kinzer reveals the complex operations of a San Francisco-based initiative known as Operation Midnight Climax, which was orchestrated by the CIA. Upon taking charge of the CIA's Technical Services Division in 1960, a unit focused on creating poisons, Gottlieb recruited Ira “Ike” Feldman, an ex-military intelligence officer, to involve sex workers in the initiative. Feldman recruited women to engage with men at a secure location on 225 Chestnut Street and covertly administer LSD to them, sometimes before or following intimate encounters. Gottlieb’s motivation in establishing Midnight Climax was to learn whether combining sex with drugs could loosen men’s tongues and lead them to reveal hidden information or, as one CIA officer put it, to “subvert his principles.”

Context

• The "safe houses" were equipped with surveillance equipment, allowing CIA operatives to observe and record the effects of LSD on the subjects without their knowledge.
• The operation took place during a time of intense geopolitical tension, with the U.S. government seeking any advantage over perceived threats from the Soviet Union and other adversaries.
• Feldman, with his military intelligence background, was seen as a suitable operative to manage the logistics and recruitment for such clandestine activities, leveraging his experience in covert operations.
• The CIA was interested in understanding how altered states of consciousness could affect decision-making and truth-telling, hoping to develop reliable methods for extracting information.
• The combination of sex and drugs was seen as a way to exploit vulnerabilities. The CIA believed that in a compromised state, individuals might divulge secrets or act against their own interests.

The Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology was set up as a cover to conceal the financial support provided by the CIA for MK-ULTRA initiatives.

Sidney Gottlieb set up a series of front organizations that covertly transferred funds from the CIA to those involved in different facets of MK-ULTRA, thus avoiding legal complications while ensuring secrecy and plausible deniability. The book details the founding of the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology in 1955, which, although Harold Wolff, a distinguished neurologist, was ostensibly in charge, was actually clandestinely directed by Gottlieb. The organization directed funds toward various initiatives that appeared disconnected from the typical pursuits of the spy agency, including examining how perceptions of nuclear fallout shelters impacted electoral choices or the impact of male circumcision in Turkey, yet these endeavors were simply a smokescreen.

Kinzer suggests that a considerable amount of the foundation's resources were dedicated to research that corresponded with Gottlieb's main areas of focus. Projects included studies on remotely initiating reactions in humans through electronic means, along with a variety of secret substances and methods aimed at disrupting mental processes, as outlined by an individual affiliated with the agency. Among the first society experiments that Gottlieb approved was a study of 100 Chinese refugees – the CIA wanted to learn how easily they could be transformed into agents and sent back to China to commit acts of sabotage – and after the 1956 Hungarian uprising, a thorough investigation into the reasons behind the Hungarian refugees' rebellion was initiated.

Context

• The establishment of such organizations reflects the lengths to which intelligence agencies might go to achieve strategic advantages, often prioritizing national security over ethical considerations.
• Harold Wolff was a prominent neurologist and psychiatrist known for his work on migraine research. His involvement lent credibility to the Society, masking its true purpose.
• MK-ULTRA was a covert CIA program initiated in the early 1950s aimed at developing mind control techniques. It involved experiments on human subjects, often without their knowledge or consent, to explore methods of influencing and controlling human behavior.
• The use of front organizations like the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology was a common tactic by intelligence agencies to obscure their involvement in controversial or secretive activities, allowing them to fund research without direct attribution.
• During the Cold War, there was significant interest in the potential for technology to influence human behavior. This included the use of radio waves, microwaves, and other electronic means to potentially alter thoughts or actions.
• The choice of Chinese refugees was likely influenced by geopolitical tensions with China and the desire to infiltrate or destabilize communist regimes.
• This was a nationwide revolt against the Soviet-imposed policies in Hungary, marking a significant moment in Cold War history. It began as a student protest and quickly escalated into a major uprising, leading to a temporary government change before being crushed by Soviet forces.

The outcomes arising from the initiative known as MK-ULTRA.

Despite a considerable investment of resources and time, the CIA did not succeed in finding a reliable way to manipulate cognitive functions. The project known as MK-ULTRA was terminated in the early 1960s, following a period during which it inflicted considerable anguish on many people. Kinzer emphasizes the disastrous consequences, underscoring the multitude of destroyed lives and the subsequent recognition of its failures by the intelligence agency.

Kinzer's analysis uncovers the gradual exposure of MK-ULTRA in the early 1970s, disclosing the operation as a deeply concealed secret of the CIA. Kinzer recounts the shift in focus to Sidney Gottlieb, an experienced overseer of the CIA's technical services, after his involvement in the Agency's mind control experiments came to light. Gottlieb's life was undergoing a significant change at this time. Upon leaving the CIA in 1973, he dedicated himself to expanding his understanding and, together with his colleague, set out on a two-year journey across Asia, which included time dedicated to assisting leprosy sufferers at a mission hospital in India. His efforts to disassociate from past deeds came to an abrupt stop as Congress initiated investigations into the CIA's wrongdoing. Gottlieb was suddenly propelled once again into public attention.

The catastrophic consequences that arose from the MK-ULTRA initiative.

The disclosure of information in the 1970s and the years that followed illuminated the grave consequences associated with the MK-ULTRA initiative. The narrative presented by Kinzer underscores the considerable chaos spawned by the misguided attempt to control human cognition, particularly highlighting two events that underscore the moral deficiencies inherent in the initiative. One is the apparent 1953 suicide of Frank Olson, one of Gottlieb closest colleagues, who seems to have plunged into an LSD-fueled psychotic breakdown after he was secretly given the drug at a CIA retreat in Maryland.

Velma Orlikow, a Canadian national, suffered irreversible mental damage due to her participation in intensive psychological conditioning trials conducted at the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal.

The apparent suicide of Frank Olson, a CIA colleague and friend of Gottlieb who knew most of MK-ULTRA's secrets, as a threat to the program leading to the administration of LSD and possibly other mind-altering substances shortly before his death

Stephen Kinzer's revelations about the MK-ULTRA program include the tragic death of Frank Olson in 1953. In the early phases of the Cold War, Olson, a skilled biochemist, committed his professional skills to the CIA's MK-ULTRA program upon recruitment. He was at the forefront of creating techniques for the aerial distribution of chemical agents at a military installation, oversaw thorough interrogation techniques, directed secret CIA sites worldwide, and witnessed events where people endured torture and, in some cases, lost their lives. His duties often required him to travel to France and various countries where CIA operatives conducted experiments on mind control, which led to several deaths, and as an agent in Frankfurt observed, getting rid of a body would not be difficult.

Kinzer describes how Olson's experiences with aggressive techniques like "psychic driving," electroshock, and other forceful interrogation tactics fueled his doubts about his position, leading him to consult a British mental health expert and eventually consider exiting the CIA for a different career path. Kinzer argues that Olson's colleagues considered him a security risk, since he knew most if not all of MK-ULTRA's secrets and was capable of creating poisons that could not be traced even after autopsy. Kinzer emphasizes that Olson, in the weeks leading up to his demise, shared with his spouse his involvement in a serious mistake.

Kinzer suggests that Olson's breaking point occurred when he was inadvertently given LSD by his CIA colleagues at a retreat, as they monitored and assessed their reactions to what they thought could act as a "truth serum." Olson, who may already have taken LSD in self-experiments, fell into a psychotic breakdown from which he did not fully recover. He traveled to New York City with his CIA colleague Robert Lashbrook. In the early morning hours of November 28, 1953, Olson plunged through a window of his thirteenth-floor hotel room and fell onto the sidewalk below.

Context

• Biochemists like Olson were crucial to MK-ULTRA because they had the expertise to develop and understand the chemical compounds used in experiments, including hallucinogens and other psychoactive substances.
• This was a covert CIA project initiated in the early 1950s aimed at developing mind control techniques. It involved experiments on unwitting subjects, often using drugs like LSD, to explore methods of interrogation and psychological manipulation.
• Consulting a British expert suggests Olson was looking for an outside perspective, possibly due to a lack of trust in American colleagues or the availability of specific expertise in the UK regarding psychological issues.
• Sharing such a burden with his spouse indicates a level of trust and desperation, suggesting he was seeking support or absolution.
• Dr. Harold Abramson was a key figure in the CIA's LSD research and was involved in treating Olson. He was one of the few medical professionals aware of the CIA's interest in using LSD for mind control.
• In the 1970s, Olson's family received a settlement from the U.S. government after the circumstances of his death were re-examined. They have continued to seek further investigation and accountability, believing he was murdered.

Other Perspectives

• The claim that Olson knew most of MK-ULTRA's secrets could be an overstatement, considering the vast scope of the program and the number of people involved, which would make it unlikely for any single individual to have comprehensive knowledge.
• The CIA might have had protocols in place to mitigate the risk posed by the potential disclosure of sensitive information following the death of an insider like Olson.
• It is possible that Olson's doubts were not solely due to his direct experiences but also due to a growing awareness of the moral implications of the program as a whole.
• Olson's colleagues may have valued his expertise and loyalty to the program, viewing him as an asset rather than a risk.
• The phrasing could imply that Olson's colleagues were uniformly complicit or negligent in the administration of LSD, which may not account for the possibility of only a select few being involved or aware of the act.
• The assertion that Olson experienced a psychotic breakdown assumes a direct causality that may not account for the possibility of a placebo effect or nocebo effect, where his response could have been influenced by his expectations or the setting.

At the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, directed by Ewen Cameron, there were experiments conducted with the objective of wiping out memories and reconfiguring the way people think, demonstrating the program's potential to cause lasting psychological damage.

Kinzer describes the experiments conducted at the Allan Memorial Institute by Dr. Ewen Cameron, a highly-regarded and prominent physician, who for years had used MK-ULTRA funds to develop what he called “psychic driving” as a way to reprogram the human mind. Cameron, who fervently believed in the necessity of discovering techniques to obliterate unwanted memories or to completely reprogram a person's psyche for external manipulation, was depicted by Kinzer as an individual who completely dismissed the ethical standards established during the Nuremberg trials.

In 1953, the year marking the beginning of MK-ULTRA, Cameron was at the helm of both the American and Canadian Psychological Associations, granting him access to a large number of patients. He selected a variety of individuals, including those experiencing milder ailments like anxiety or postpartum depression, and although he held them in high regard, he still subjected them to his rigorous experimental treatments. Kinzer details techniques that began by confining the subject within a small, acoustically sealed room for several days. The patient subsequently became unconscious following the administration of a significant dose of LSD or a comparable psychedelic substance, and then underwent electroconvulsive therapy at levels 30 to 40 times higher than the norm for conventional psychotherapeutic treatments.

Cameron conducted sessions where patients were exposed to prerecorded messages continuously throughout the entire duration of each day's daylight hours. In the final phase, patients received a significant amount of sedatives or sleeping pills for a stretch of seven to ten consecutive days. The agency provided Cameron with funding amounting to $69,000 to conduct Subproject 68 of MK-ULTRA, during which he administered these treatments to numerous patients.

Context

• The use of high doses of LSD and extreme electroconvulsive therapy was intended to break down the patient's existing personality to rebuild it from scratch, a process Cameron thought could cure mental illness.
• MK-ULTRA was a covert CIA project initiated in the early 1950s aimed at developing mind control techniques. It involved various experiments on human subjects, often without their consent, to explore methods of influencing and controlling human behavior.
• As a leading figure in psychiatry, Cameron's involvement in such experiments underscores a troubling intersection of authority and unethical practice, where his status may have shielded him from scrutiny and allowed for the continuation of harmful experiments.
• Holding leadership positions in both the American and Canadian Psychological Associations would have given Dr. Ewen Cameron significant influence over the direction of psychological research and practice in North America during the early 1950s.
• The revelations about MK-ULTRA and Cameron's experiments led to public outcry and legal actions, including lawsuits from victims and their families seeking justice and compensation.
• The use of small, acoustically sealed rooms was intended to isolate patients from external stimuli, creating an environment where they were more susceptible to the experimental treatments being tested, such as sensory deprivation and psychological manipulation.
• ECT is a psychiatric treatment where seizures are electrically induced in patients to provide relief from mental disorders. In the context of these experiments, it was used at much higher intensities than standard therapeutic practices, which posed significant risks.
• The use of prerecorded messages was part of a method called "psychic driving," which aimed to alter a person's behavior by repeatedly playing specific messages to implant new thoughts or erase existing ones.
• Prolonged sedation can have profound psychological effects, potentially leading to long-term cognitive impairments, memory loss, and emotional instability, which were often not fully understood or considered by researchers at the time.

Revelations concerning the clandestine initiative known as MK-ULTRA.

After two decades of activity, the MK-ULTRA initiative came to an end. The need for secrecy likewise intensified. During the 1972 Watergate hearings, it was revealed that the CIA's clandestine operations were compromised, revealing the connection between its Technical Services Division and the people responsible for the Watergate intrusion. As his time leading the CIA drew to a close, Helms instructed Gottlieb to destroy all documentation related to the MK-ULTRA project, motivated by the concern that James Schlesinger, the forthcoming DCI, might reveal many disconcerting details through his investigations. Despite attempts to conceal the narrative, it ultimately entered the public domain through journalistic disclosures.

Kinzer elaborates on the subsequent inquiries that took place amid widespread skepticism and suspicion aimed towards the CIA. Presidents Ford and Carter sought to limit the repercussions of the scandal by narrowing the investigation's range, and Gottlieb utilized legal strategies to evade potential litigation.

Schlesinger's order played a pivotal role in uncovering the program by mandating that CIA agents disclose any unsanctioned or illegal actions, which ultimately led to the revelation of the agency's "family jewels."

In 1973, the initial exposure of MK-ULTRA occurred when James Schlesinger, the newly appointed CIA director, ordered all agency employees to disclose any unauthorized activities they had participated in or were aware of. The candid revelations culminated in a detailed 693-page report brimming with sensitive details, which subsequently became referred to as the CIA's "crown jewels." Schlesinger was reassigned to a different position, and consequently, the dossier stayed hidden from the public eye, safeguarded by William Colby, his successor, along with the House and Senate Armed Services committees responsible for overseeing the CIA.

The revelation of the "family jewels" became public knowledge in 1974 when it was reported on the front page of the New York Times by journalist Seymour Hersh, as Kinzer disclosed. The release of the article, which shed light on a CIA operation that illegally collected information on many Americans who were against the war, set off a chain of investigations that ultimately included MK-ULTRA.

Context

• The order underscored the importance of whistleblowers in revealing misconduct within government agencies, setting a precedent for future disclosures and protections for those who report illegal activities.
• James Schlesinger's directive was part of a broader effort to reform the CIA and address concerns about its accountability and transparency following various scandals.
• The 693-page report was significant because it documented a wide range of covert operations that were not only unauthorized but also potentially illegal, highlighting the extent of the CIA's overreach during the Cold War era.
• These committees have the authority to conduct hearings, subpoena witnesses, and demand documents, which are crucial tools for investigating and understanding the scope of intelligence activities.
• The New York Times was a leading newspaper with a wide readership, and its publication of Hersh's article played a crucial role in bringing the CIA's activities to the attention of the American public and policymakers.
• During the 1960s and 1970s, the United States was embroiled in the Vietnam War, which sparked widespread anti-war protests and movements across the country. Many Americans, including students, activists, and various organizations, vocally opposed the war, leading to significant social and political unrest.

The Church Committee's probe into the CIA's clandestine activities, including assassination schemes and Gottlieb's connection to MK-ULTRA, led to his secret testimony under the pseudonym "Joseph Scheider."

Upon learning about the highly confidential details pertaining to the CIA, Congress established a committee led by Senator Frank Church, which came to be known as the Church Committee. The investigation deepened, shifting focus from domestic surveillance to the CIA's involvement in plots to overthrow foreign leaders. In November 1975, the inquiry reached its peak when a document known as "Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders" was unveiled. Kinzer recounts that Gottlieb kept his participation in lethal schemes concealed, which piqued the committee's interest, especially because of his trips to the Congo and other countries where these activities were underway. The Committee secured Gottlieb's adherence to their directives by promising him protection from any legal repercussions.

Gottlieb shared his experiences under a false name after his lawyer, Terry Lenzner, persuaded the Committee to allow his true identity to remain hidden. They adopted the pseudonym "Joseph Scheider," which was derived from a 19th-century tobacconist known for a lithograph on his tobacco products. The lithograph shows a monk clad in a hooded robe.

Displayed prominently in a strikingly bold font. Gottlieb possessed a remarkable ability to protect classified information through his expertise in clandestine activities, and his presence was both captivating and unsettling.

Context

• Senator Frank Church, a Democrat from Idaho, was chosen to lead the committee due to his seniority and reputation for integrity and independence.
• Initially, the focus was on domestic surveillance, including the monitoring of American citizens, which was part of a broader concern about civil liberties violations during the Cold War.
• The document implicated several high-profile figures and operations, including attempts on leaders like Fidel Castro of Cuba and Patrice Lumumba of the Congo.
• The use of a pseudonym for Gottlieb's testimony highlights the sensitive nature of his work and the potential legal and ethical implications of his actions.
• Offering immunity or protection from prosecution is a common practice in legal investigations to encourage testimony from individuals who might otherwise refuse to cooperate due to fear of self-incrimination.
• Monks, often depicted in hooded robes, can symbolize secrecy, wisdom, or asceticism. This imagery might have been chosen to reflect the secretive nature of Gottlieb's work.
• The use of bold fonts in lithographs or any printed material is typically intended to draw attention and convey importance or urgency, which might parallel the serious nature of the testimony.
• Gottlieb was known for his deep involvement in covert operations, which required a high level of secrecy and manipulation. His ability to navigate these secretive environments made him a figure of intrigue and suspicion.

The Rockefeller Commission played a crucial role in bringing to light the MK-ULTRA program and scrutinizing Sidney Gottlieb's role in the destruction of its records for the first time.

President Ford took the initiative to form a commission led by Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, who was a staunch supporter of the CIA. During his meeting with Richard Helms, who was well-versed in the CIA's history, Ford conveyed his disappointment with the scandals surrounding the organization and sought advice from Helms.

Helm responded with both prudence and foresight, indicating his readiness to be involved but also cautioning that unsettling revelations were forthcoming. That "participation" would not entail complete transparency. In his book, Kinzer describes the agreement between Helms and Gottlieb that was intended to ensure that no sensitive details regarding MK-ULTRA would be disclosed. The report from the Rockefeller Commission discreetly hinted at the destruction of records pertaining to MK-ULTRA.

Context

• As Vice President under President Ford, Rockefeller was chosen to lead the commission partly due to his political stature and perceived ability to manage the investigation without causing excessive damage to the CIA's reputation.
• The Rockefeller family had longstanding ties to government and intelligence agencies, often advocating for strong national defense and international engagement, which could explain Nelson Rockefeller's supportive stance.
• Gerald Ford became President in 1974 following Nixon's resignation. His administration was marked by efforts to restore public trust in government institutions, including the CIA.
• Helms was involved in the decision to destroy many of the MK-ULTRA records in 1973, which was intended to prevent the details of the program from becoming public knowledge.
• By agreeing to participate but warning of limited transparency, Helms likely aimed to control the narrative and protect sensitive information from public exposure, balancing cooperation with the need to safeguard CIA interests.
• Formed in 1975, this commission was tasked with investigating CIA activities, including domestic operations that were potentially illegal. It was one of the first public acknowledgments of the CIA's controversial practices.

Gottlieb's legacy and its effects persisted well beyond his lifetime.

Sidney Gottlieb's life following his departure from the CIA was characterized by remarkable contrasts. He led a clandestine realm committed to scientific and technological progress for two decades, significantly contributing to the United States' hidden military operations and supervising studies that inflicted pain on many people. Then, in 1973, he sought a path to redemption, setting off for what he and his wife hoped would be a life of simple living and spiritual fulfillment dedicated to humanitarian service in foreign lands. He traveled across Australia and Africa before finally reaching India.

Gottlieb perhaps envisioned this journey as a means to cleanse himself of his dark history. The situation remained unchanged. The project referred to as MK-ULTRA was scrutinized anew during later Senate hearings and a multitude of legal disputes, leading to a significant decline in its historical standing. He presented himself to legislative committees twice, yet he managed to avoid being directly accountable for his actions. This showcased his skill in navigating around legal constraints, and Kinzer notes that political leaders were reluctant to subject the CIA's rigorous psychological experiments to the full light of public examination.

After his departure from the CIA and subsequent relocation to India for a new beginning, Gottlieb was called before the Senate Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research to provide testimony regarding the clandestine mind-control initiative.

In his later years, Gottlieb experienced a sense of peace and satisfaction, although the actions of his past continued to loom over this tranquil phase. It's possible he believed his association with MK-ULTRA was behind him. He also disposed of documentation that would have detailed his actions. Several operatives conveyed to the inquiry panel that their understanding of the MK-ULTRA program was rather restricted.

In 1977, a Freedom of Information Act inquiry brought to light a plethora of fiscal records associated with the MK-ULTRA project, as Kinzer elaborates. Senator Edward Kennedy, at the helm of the Health and Scientific Research Subcommittee, summoned Gottlieb to Washington to provide a more comprehensive account of his role in the drug experiments conducted as part of MK-ULTRA. Gottlieb consented to appear before the subcommittee only after being assured that he would receive immunity.

Context

• A prominent U.S. senator known for his work on health and civil rights issues, Kennedy was instrumental in leading investigations into government misconduct, including the MK-ULTRA hearings.
• Enacted in 1966, the FOIA allows the public to request access to records from any federal agency, promoting transparency and accountability in government operations.

Other Perspectives

• Relocating to India does not necessarily guarantee a fresh start, as personal history and past actions can follow an individual regardless of their location.
• The notion of peace and satisfaction is subjective and may not fully account for any private struggles or regrets Gottlieb might have experienced but did not express publicly.
• The act of disposing of documentation related to his actions suggests an awareness that the past could resurface, contradicting the belief that his MK-ULTRA involvement was truly behind him.
• The destruction of records may indicate an attempt to avoid accountability for unethical or illegal actions conducted under the program.
• Operatives may have been given only as much information as was necessary to perform their specific tasks, which is a common practice in classified operations to maintain security and compartmentalization.
• The decision to grant immunity to Gottlieb could be criticized for potentially undermining the severity of the ethical and legal violations that occurred under MK-ULTRA.

The lawsuit brought by Stanley Glickman against Gottlieb, which was one among several including those by Frank Olson's family and Velma Orlikow, claimed that Gottlieb had administered drugs to him in Paris and exposed the enduring mental trauma resulting from his involvement in the clandestine CIA activities.

Gottlieb faced numerous legal challenges as a result of the revelation of MK-ULTRA's experimental activities. In the early 1980s, three former inmates initiated a lawsuit alleging that their mental health had been endangered due to trials with LSD conducted during their imprisonment at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary, which Dr. Carl Pfeiffer conducted for the CIA. The lawsuit was not pursued further due to procedural technicalities, but it set a precedent for subsequent legal proceedings. Stephen Kinzer points out that Velma Orlikow in Canada is the most recognized individual who suffered due to her involvement in MK-ULTRA.

In 1980, Orlikow, along with several others who had suffered through the mind-altering trials overseen by Dr. Ewen Cameron at the Allan Memorial Institute, began a lawsuit against the CIA. The authorities in Canada settled the legal matter out of court, providing $100,000 to each of the nine plaintiffs without acknowledging any liability for the experiments carried out by Cameron. According to Kinzer, the CIA has not provided any monetary compensation to those harmed by its MK-ULTRA activities. During a conversation, the lawyer representing the Canadian authorities noted that Gottlieb was particularly notorious, not just for authorizing acts of torture but also for his nonchalant approach to evading responsibility.

Context

• A CIA scientist who died under mysterious circumstances in 1953 after being unwittingly dosed with LSD. His case brought significant attention to the unethical practices of MK-ULTRA.
• In 1953, Olson died after falling from a hotel window in New York City. His death was initially ruled a suicide, but later investigations suggested it might have been a result of foul play linked to his work with the CIA.
• Orlikow was a patient at the Allan Memorial Institute, seeking treatment for postpartum depression. Unbeknownst to her, she became part of Cameron's experiments, which caused significant psychological harm.
• The lawsuit at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary highlighted the legal challenges of holding government officials accountable for clandestine activities. Although the case was dismissed on procedural grounds, it raised awareness and set a framework for future legal actions against unethical government experiments.
• The Canadian government eventually provided compensation to some victims, acknowledging the harm caused by the experiments conducted within its borders, although the CIA itself did not admit liability.
• Despite the settlement, the CIA has historically avoided taking responsibility for the harm caused by MK-ULTRA, often citing national security concerns to withhold information and evade legal consequences.
• The lack of admission of liability in legal settlements is a common practice to avoid setting a legal precedent or accepting blame, which could lead to further lawsuits or claims.
• The lack of compensation reflects broader challenges in holding intelligence agencies accountable for covert operations that violate human rights.