PDF Summary:On Killing, by Dave Grossman

In the acclaimed work On Killing, Dave Grossman examines the innate human aversion to taking life and the psychological factors that enable killing—from military training techniques to the immersive power of media and entertainment.

Grossman compellingly argues that overcoming our natural resistance to lethal violence, once confined largely to warfare, is now being enabled by society itself. His thought-provoking perspective explores how the widespread depiction of violence in media, combined with the erosion of traditional moral pillars, is gradually desensitizing humanity to the sanctity of life.

(continued)...

• The impact of cultural, societal, and ethical differences on the recognition of shared humanity can vary widely among individuals, and some may not experience a reduction in empathy despite these differences.
• The consequences of reluctance to kill on communities and traditions are complex and can be influenced by many factors, including the nature of the conflict and the societal narrative surrounding it.
• The psychological distress of veterans is a serious concern, but there are also individuals who do not experience remorse or PTSD following lethal conflicts, suggesting a range of responses to such experiences.
• Societal and cultural views on the impact of taking a life are not monolithic, and different societies may have varying mechanisms for dealing with the aftermath of conflict and killing.

Methods for addressing the hesitation associated with taking a life.

Military frameworks utilize specialized training and conditioning to streamline the process of taking lives.

The text explores the intentional yet frequently subconscious strategies employed to increase the capacity of military members to effectively use lethal force. Grossman acknowledges the necessity of preparing military members for the brutal realities of warfare, but he also voices concern about the ethical implications of this preparation and its potential impact on individuals and society as a whole. He meticulously explains the methods employed to overcome the inherent resistance to taking another's life, particularly in modern military forces.

The process of taking a life becomes linked with positive reinforcement through established conditioning techniques.

Grossman delves into the methods modern military forces use to apply behavioral psychology concepts, training their soldiers to grow increasingly accustomed to the harsh realities of violence and death through the use of associative learning and gradual exposure, which reduces their aversion to such experiences. Service members undergo a rigorous training program that uses intense imagery, spoken prompts, and simulated confrontations, which is regularly reinforced with accolades, the strengthening of social ties, and occasionally, tangible rewards. He references actual instances, from basic training customs that include chants celebrating aggression to the employment of graphic films and instructional videos aimed at desensitizing individuals to the act of taking a life.

He explains that soldiers are trained to regard the act of taking a life as a critical skill associated with positive outcomes, thus transforming its perception from a morally reprehensible act to a vital skill that must be refined.

Simulators are utilized in training to cultivate automatic responses when it's necessary to employ deadly force.

Grossman examines the ways in which military training desensitizes personnel, enhancing their ability to partake in deadly confrontations. Soldiers undergo training with sophisticated simulators that replicate the intense conditions of combat, where they must swiftly make decisions and engage with targets that appear abruptly and fall instantly when hit. Grossman notes that this type of training, which includes immediate feedback and positive reinforcement shaping behavior, is highly effective in developing automatic responses that lead military personnel to respond with deadly force upon sensing a threat.

The importance of recognizing the impact of collective influence and leadership in overcoming resistance.

Grossman emphasizes the critical role that leadership and collective interaction play in enabling individuals to perform actions that might risk lives in battle situations. The author cites the pivotal Milgram experiments to demonstrate that soldiers, when trained to follow orders without question, can overcome their natural reluctance to kill under the direction of a superior officer.

Grossman highlights how an individual's sense of accountability is lessened when they act within a group. He argues that the deep camaraderie and shared objectives within military ranks, along with the shared burden of moral accountability, make it easier to carry out acts that might be deemed morally indefensible if done alone.

Societal and cultural elements that enable acts of violence and homicide.

The examination broadens the scope to include civilian settings in addition to military ones. Grossman suggests that the inclination to engage in lethal violence is not confined to combat zones but is influenced by various societal and cultural factors that can promote or inhibit such conduct. He contends that the widespread portrayal of violence in media and entertainment plays a substantial role in numbing society to and normalizing deadly conduct.

The depiction of victims in media and entertainment plays a role in diminishing their humanity and creates a separation of ethical responsibility.

Grossman posits that the frequent depiction of violence across different media platforms, including movies, television shows, and video games, acts as a significant societal influence that reduces our emotional response to violence and death, thereby eroding our empathetic abilities and fostering a tolerance for aggressive conduct. Grossman posits that the entertainment industry often utilizes methods similar to military propaganda, which reduces the sense of others' humanity and establishes a moral disconnection, making acts of violence more palatable to audiences.

The collapse of traditional social structures and support systems, especially for the youth.

Grossman posits that the erosion of fundamental societal pillars, including parental-led family groups, faith-based organizations, and tight community bonds, plays a role in escalating societal aggression. He argues that such institutions have historically played a crucial role in providing moral guidance, strengthening bonds within communities, and promoting a sense of belonging, all of which help to reduce aggressive behavior and promote collaboration.

Grossman emphasizes that the increasing feelings of alienation and disconnection common in modern youth, stemming from an absence of role models and meaningful relationships, could render them more prone to yielding to violent behaviors.

The widespread admiration for weaponry and the elevated esteem bestowed upon individuals celebrated for their violent deeds,

Grossman suggests that the prevalent availability and glorification of firearms in popular culture greatly eases the perpetration of violent deeds. He also emphasizes the impact of violent characters in media, highlighting that the celebration of those who engage in unlawful, revengeful, and savage behavior can desensitize individuals and suggest that using force is a suitable method for resolving conflicts.

Other Perspectives

• Military training also focuses on discipline, ethics, and the laws of war, not just desensitization to violence.
• Viewing killing as a critical skill can be seen as a necessary adaptation to the context of war, where hesitation can result in mission failure or loss of life among comrades.
• Simulators are used for a variety of training purposes, including non-lethal scenarios, medical training, and strategic decision-making, not solely for desensitizing to deadly force.
• Leadership in the military context is also about ensuring the well-being of soldiers and fostering a sense of responsibility and accountability, not just overcoming resistance to killing.
• Media and entertainment can also promote anti-violence messages, empathy, and the value of human life through storytelling and character development.
• Some media representations aim to highlight the consequences of violence and the complexity of ethical decision-making, rather than diminishing the humanity of victims.
• Traditional social structures can sometimes perpetuate violence and aggression through norms and practices that are not adaptive or healthy in modern society.
• Admiration for weaponry and violent individuals in media can also be contextualized within narratives that critique or explore the consequences of violence, rather than simply glorifying it.

Military regulations that allow for the use of deadly force and the wider societal aggression are interconnected.

The escalation of violent, aggressive, and deadly conduct in society reflects the training techniques employed by the armed forces.

Grossman suggests that the techniques used by the military to make it easier for soldiers to kill in battle are alarmingly similar to the factors contributing to an increased acceptance and approval of violence in daily existence. He argues convincingly that the increase in aggressive behavior, especially among young people, reflects a broader societal acceptance of these actions, which is heavily influenced by how they are depicted in entertainment, thus creating a conducive atmosphere for such behavior.

The book delves into the psychological foundations of lethal conflict and their relation to wider societal issues regarding violence. Grossman contends that while the military’s purpose in overcoming soldiers’ resistance is to increase their battlefield effectiveness and ensure their survival, the indiscriminate application of similar techniques in civilian society is having a dire impact on our communities.

Various forms of media, including video games, often utilize training methods grounded in the foundational concepts of stimulus-response and reward-based learning.

Grossman contends that the techniques used by the armed forces to make it easier for soldiers to take lives, including becoming numb to the violence and extensive training, disturbingly reflect aspects of everyday life, particularly in entertainment. He contends that the pervasive portrayal of explicit violence across various media platforms, including movies, television series, music verses, and particularly when participating in video games, diminishes an individual's response to violent acts and functions as a type of classical conditioning, linking exciting and enjoyable moments with aggressive actions.

Furthermore, Grossman draws parallels between the realistic and immersive environments of military training simulations, which enable soldiers to refine their responses, and the broad popularity of interactive games that feature aggressive content. He contends that these games serve as preparatory platforms, rewarding players for increasing their tally of kills and engaging in more graphically violent acts, thus conditioning young people to react impulsively and with aggression when confronted with perilous scenarios, similar to the conduct exhibited by combatants during warfare.

Military training includes particular protective measures and oversight procedures that are absent in this scenario.

While Grossman acknowledges that these methods are successful in readying military members, he highlights a crucial distinction: the best military training includes safeguards and accountability mechanisms that typically do not exist in civilian settings. He asserts that the armed forces employ comprehensive and structured preparation techniques to equip soldiers for encounters with the enemy. Service members receive training that emphasizes the importance of discipline in handling weapons and obeying commands, as neglecting these responsibilities can result in punitive measures.

Grossman suggests that civilian life does not demand the same level of accountability from individuals, and this, combined with the experience of viewing violence that is presented without any real-world repercussions, can desensitize people to acts of violence, resulting in a heightened tolerance for aggressive behavior and a diminished reverence for the value of human existence. Grossman suggests that when media representations of violence blur the line between reality and fiction, send conflicting ethical signals, and show behaviors without subsequent consequences, it can lead to significant negative effects for both individuals and the broader community.

The societal and cultural impacts of enabling killing, especially among youth

Grossman explores the impact of pervasive violent imagery on society, discussing how it can numb individuals and influence actions, which contributes to an alarming increase in violence within communities, particularly affecting young people.

The incidence of violent crime is on the rise.

Dave Grossman establishes a link between the growing depiction of violence aimed at younger audiences and an escalation in violent crimes, such as school shootings and numerous types of aggressive conduct that impact our society. He argues that the desensitizing effect of violent media content, along with a lack of robust social support structures and a shortage of role models, is molding a generation of young people who are more prone to turn to violence as a means of settling disputes.

The lasting psychological and societal impacts of nurturing a community profoundly rooted in hostility.

Grossman warns that a widespread culture of violence could erode our ability to empathize and care, potentially undermining our respect for the sanctity of life, highlighting the lasting psychological and societal impacts. He contends that this "moral decay" not only escalates the frequency of violent behavior but also contributes to the widespread decline of courtesy, trust among individuals, and the cohesion of the community.

Challenges and strategies for "resensitizing" society and restoring aversion to killing

The author concludes his work by addressing the crucial matter of reawakening the natural aversion to killing within society, an instinct he argues is being eroded by the prevalent violence in contemporary culture. He recommends a more conscious and deliberate strategy to lessen the desensitizing effects of media and entertainment, urging for more stringent restrictions on the availability of violent material to the youth.

He also advocates for reinforcing the ties within families, bolstering educational structures, and fortifying the pillars of community, underscoring the importance of mentors, developing effective strategies for resolving disputes, and a collective endeavor to foster kindness, goodwill, and an unwavering reverence for life.

Other Perspectives

• Military training is designed with a specific context in mind, and it is not necessarily accurate to directly correlate military conditioning with societal violence without considering other factors such as socioeconomic conditions, education, and family dynamics.
• The assertion that media and video games directly lead to an increase in societal violence is debated within the academic community, with many studies showing no clear causal link between violent media consumption and aggressive behavior in real life.
• The rise in violent crime can be multifactorial, and attributing it mainly to the influence of media overlooks other potential contributors such as mental health issues, access to firearms, and systemic inequality.
• The idea that society is becoming more violent may be challenged by statistics showing that, in many areas, violent crime rates have been decreasing over the long term.
• The concept of desensitization is complex, and while some may become more numb to violence, others may become more empathetic or react with increased aversion to real-world violence after exposure to violent media.
• The effectiveness of "resensitizing" society to violence through media restrictions could be questioned on the grounds of practicality, freedom of expression, and the potential for such measures to have unintended consequences.
• The role of family and community structures in mitigating violence is important, but focusing solely on these elements may oversimplify the issue and ignore the need for systemic and policy-level interventions.
• The assumption that military-style discipline and oversight would be beneficial if applied to civilian life does not account for the fundamental differences between military and civilian contexts and the potential for such measures to conflict with personal freedoms and civil liberties.