PDF Summary:On Combat, by Dave Grossman and Loren W. Christensen

In On Combat, Dave Grossman and Loren W. Christensen provide a comprehensive guide to the physiological and psychological changes individuals experience in combat situations. The authors explore the body's survival responses, altered perceptions, and the critical need for the right warrior mindset—from anticipating the "fear puppies" to handling post-traumatic stress.

Beyond the battlefield, they underscore society's duty to support veterans reintegrating into civilian life. Grossman and Christensen shed light on the warrior's ethical role as a guardian, safeguarding the vulnerable as society's protectors. Through metaphor and philosophy, they reframe how we view combat and its consequences.

(continued)...

The responsibilities of a warrior extend beyond the physical domain, including moral and spiritual dimensions.

This part explores the profound ethical and spiritual conflicts faced by those obligated to use lethal force while performing their duties. The book challenges the misconception that all acts of killing are morally wrong by examining the nuanced ethical perspectives found in Jewish and Christian teachings, highlighting the distinction between unjustified killing and the act of defending the innocent. The book emphasizes the importance of developing a warrior's mindset grounded in the concept of justice rather than vengeance, which acts as a safeguard against ethical damage and the psychological distress associated with post-combat stress.

The warrior's ethical duty to protect those who are defenseless sometimes requires the challenging choice to end a life if it is essential.

Grossman delves into the deep moral dilemma faced by combatants when they are confronted with the decision to take another person's life. He argues that this decision should be made with moral certainty, distanced from the chaos of battle, fostering a mindset that recognizes the inherent duty of a warrior to protect those in jeopardy by being prepared to use lethal force if necessary. Grossman suggests that adopting this perspective not only bolsters a person's capacity to avert violent encounters but also diminishes the chances of experiencing subsequent psychological trauma. He cites historical figures such as the biblical King David, who is celebrated for his bravery during combat, while also maintaining the core of righteousness as prescribed by the divine, and modern warriors who conduct themselves in accordance with their spiritual convictions. He underscores the critical need to acknowledge when lethal force may be required and to prepare psychologically for that possibility, as it is essential for preserving both effectiveness and mental well-being.

Ending a life and the act of homicide are two separate notions.

Grossman emphasizes the vital distinction between the responsibility of taking a life in certain circumstances and the criminal act of homicide, drawing on religious and legal contexts. He challenges the simplistic interpretation of the Sixth Commandment, arguing that it is more accurately rendered within the Judeo-Christian context as "You shall not commit unlawful killing." Employing lethal force to protect oneself or others fundamentally differs from committing an unlawful act of homicide. Grossman underscores the necessity for warriors to grasp this distinction, ensuring their conduct is in harmony with their moral convictions and thus averting profound remorse later on.

Fostering a mindset that values justice above retribution can ease the burden endured by individuals who experience profound regret.

The authors stress the significance of cultivating a mindset akin to that of a warrior, which is founded on the ideals of justice instead of retaliation, underscoring the vital role this distinction plays in preserving ethical integrity and psychological well-being. Personal grudges and the pursuit of retribution can erode the moral code of a combatant, potentially leading to psychological harm and a heightened risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder. Justice demands a steadfast dedication to safeguarding the defenseless and enforcing consequences for misconduct. The authors suggest that adopting this viewpoint allows those involved in combat to carry out their duties with guidance from moral values that go beyond personal retribution, aiding in the preservation of a clear conscience.

Choosing to affirm life instead of employing the concept of mortality as a coping mechanism for survivor's guilt.

Grossman delves into the psychological burdens borne by survivors, offering an outlook that prioritizes the significance of life over death. He argues that those who survive owe it to their fallen peers to live life to the fullest and make certain that each day holds significance. Grossman emphasizes the necessity of adopting this mentality to successfully counteract the harmful inclinations that frequently accompany survivor's guilt. He urges those who confront battle to lead lives of purpose and meaning, thus creating a legacy that honors those who have perished.

Other Perspectives

• While acknowledging the impact of combat is crucial, some argue that overemphasis on potential trauma can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy where soldiers expect to be traumatized, which may negatively influence their mental health outcomes.
• Methods to alleviate mental and ethical challenges may not be universally effective, as individuals respond differently to stress and trauma; what works for one person may not work for another.
• The effectiveness of breath control techniques can vary, and some individuals may find these methods less helpful than others, or may require additional interventions to manage stress responses.
• The assumption that debriefings can prevent PTSD might be overly optimistic, as PTSD is a complex condition that may require more comprehensive mental health interventions.
• The notion that debriefings can separate emotional responses from traumatic memories may not account for the intricacies of how memory and emotion are intertwined in the brain.
• The ethical duty to protect the defenseless by potentially ending a life is a deeply controversial subject, and some may argue that there are always non-lethal alternatives that should be pursued first.
• The distinction between ending a life and committing homicide, while legally and ethically significant, may not alleviate the moral burden or psychological impact on the individual who has taken a life.
• Valuing justice over retribution is an ideal that may not always align with the complex realities of combat and the personal feelings of those involved.
• The concept of affirming life to cope with survivor's guilt may not resonate with everyone, as individuals process grief and trauma in diverse ways, and some may find other coping mechanisms more effective.

The enduring psychological impacts on individuals after experiencing combat, including the lasting effects and mental health implications, also involve providing support to veterans as they transition back to civilian life.

This chapter delves into the enduring effects of combat on a warrior's life, extending far past their active engagement in war zones. The book explores the psychological effects that linger after traumatic events, scrutinizes the nature of post-traumatic stress disorder and methods for its control, and underscores the importance of a nurturing community for veterans reintegrating into civilian society.

The psychological and emotional consequences often endured after traumatic experiences in combat.

This section delves into the range of psychological responses that are commonly encountered after experiencing traumatic events, which can include witnessing violence, suffering serious injuries, or engaging in combat. The text emphasizes the need to recognize that these reactions are normal under exceptional conditions and highlights the dangers of neglecting these responses, along with the critical importance of obtaining professional assistance when it's needed.

The event's memory significantly impacts the warrior as well as those close to him.

Grossman explores the difficulties warriors encounter when persistent memories of traumatic events continue to interfere with their daily lives long after the events have taken place. People might experience the event again in their minds through intense flashbacks or unsettling dreams, which can be triggered by common environmental stimuli. The emergence of these memories can cause significant disruption in the life of a combatant, resulting in increased stress, episodes of panic, and emotional distress. The authors emphasize the necessity of dealing with these experiences, as failing to address them could lead to PTSD and negatively affect the soldier's family and personal relationships.

Warriors consistently steer clear of any reminders or triggers associated with their distressing memories.

This section of the text explores the common tendency to avoid anything that could trigger memories of the traumatic event. Individuals might show tendencies to evade by keeping quiet regarding the incident, deliberately avoiding activities or places that might evoke memories, and withdrawing from social interactions. The authors contend that neglecting the problem could in fact intensify the symptoms linked to post-traumatic stress disorder. The life of a warrior can be burdened by the psychological impact of constantly suppressing memories, potentially leading to isolation, diminished emotional reactions, and challenges in forming intimate bonds.

Constantly being on high alert can lead to disrupted sleep and increased irritability

Grossman highlights how an individual may enter a heightened state of vigilance following a traumatic event, characterized by intensified awareness and an amplified response to abrupt or unforeseen events. He explains that the continuous pressure and the resulting release of hormones associated with stress can have detrimental impacts on a combatant's psychological and physiological state, disrupt intimate bonds, and undermine their overall health. Left unchecked, hyper-vigilance may evolve into a debilitating characteristic of PTSD, preventing the warrior from relaxing or fully participating in tranquil activities.

Recognizing that the mental stress stemming from situations of combat often leads to PTSD, a common reaction, and underscoring the importance of seeking therapeutic support.

This passage emphasizes the importance of making discussions about psychological health commonplace among those in the warrior community, especially in relation to traits associated with post-traumatic stress disorder. Grossman suggests that the development of PTSD often occurs as a normal reaction to the intense stress encountered during combat, akin to grieving for a past life that was free from the impacts of violence and trauma. However, he underscores the importance of seeking professional guidance and cautions against the pitfalls of denying the problem while maintaining an excessively stoic facade. He also challenges the widespread depiction suggesting that PTSD is an incurable condition.

PTSD is often a normal reaction to an exceptional event, similar to the grieving process.

Grossman argues that PTSD is not a reflection of weakness or a flaw within an individual's character. He characterizes it as a typical response to an extraordinary occurrence, akin to the mourning process that follows a major loss. He draws a comparison between the symptoms of PTSD and the process of grieving, underscoring the necessity of a robust network of support and expert guidance, along with the passage of time, to surmount this challenging experience. Dave Grossman aims to create an environment that supports warriors by depicting PTSD as a common response to trauma, which in turn diminishes the stigma of seeking help.

The prevalence of PTSD among veterans who have come back and strategies to alleviate its harmful effects.

Grossman argues that the media often overstates the duration and intensity of post-traumatic stress disorder, impacting many veterans following their period of service. He argues that PTSD is often portrayed as an incurable and perpetual disorder, dooming veterans to persistent suffering. He suggests that this skewed perspective could cause veterans to engage too much in undue self-commiseration, which in turn amplifies their feelings of defenselessness and impotence.

A robust support system comprising relatives, companions, and mental health professionals is essential when veterans transition back into civilian existence.

Grossman emphasizes the critical role that strong support systems play in helping veterans tackle challenges related to post-traumatic stress disorder. Relatives and experts in the field of mental health recovery can offer assistance and direction. He underscores the importance of open communication, urging veterans to form connections with reliable people and to share their stories. He also encourages loved ones and companions to familiarize themselves with the signs of PTSD and to offer unwavering, unbiased support.

It is incumbent upon society to offer assistance to its warriors once they have confronted the rigors of battle, acknowledging the significant sacrifices they have made.

The dialogue highlights the shared responsibility to support veterans, emphasizing their value as a resource, rather than perceiving them as damaged or diminished. Grossman underscores the strong capabilities and seasoned expertise of veterans, challenging the idea that they are liabilities or individuals in distress. He argues that society bears the responsibility of providing veterans with adequate support, such as mental health services, career education, and employment opportunities, in recognition of their significant role in forging a stronger and more resilient community.

Other Perspectives

• While the text emphasizes the prevalence of PTSD and the need for support, it's important to recognize that not all veterans experience PTSD or require the same level of support; some may reintegrate into civilian life without significant psychological distress.
• The comparison of PTSD to the grieving process may oversimplify the complexity of PTSD, which can manifest in various forms and may not always align with the stages or experiences of grief.
• Avoidance of triggers is a common symptom of PTSD, but it's also a coping mechanism that can sometimes serve a protective function for individuals, allowing them to gradually process trauma at their own pace.
• The focus on therapeutic support might overshadow the potential benefits of peer support groups, community engagement, and other non-clinical forms of assistance that can also be effective in helping veterans transition to civilian life.
• The narrative that society should provide assistance to veterans could be complemented by recognizing the agency and resilience of veterans themselves, as well as the contributions they can make to society post-service.
• The idea that PTSD is a "normal" reaction might inadvertently minimize the experiences of those for whom PTSD is particularly debilitating or chronic, suggesting that their response is abnormal or that they should be coping better.
• The text may not fully address the diversity of experiences among veterans, including differences due to gender, ethnicity, or the nature of their service, which can influence the type and extent of support needed.
• The call for societal support could be expanded to include systemic changes in military culture, policies, and pre-deployment training that might prevent or mitigate the psychological impacts of combat.
• The emphasis on mental health might inadvertently neglect the importance of addressing physical health issues that often accompany psychological trauma, such as chronic pain or brain injuries, which can also affect mental well-being.
• The assertion that the media overstates the duration and intensity of PTSD could be challenged by considering that media portrayals might reflect the real and significant struggles faced by some veterans, and that these portrayals can help raise awareness and drive resource allocation.

Advancements in armaments and the role of individuals who engage in combat have evolved.

The final part of the book explores the evolution of armaments through history, emphasizing the interplay between human physical limitations, the psychological adaptations they employ, and the ever-changing strategies of combat. The book explores the consequences of adopting military mental preparedness techniques, particularly those that enable the use of deadly force, when such methods are introduced into civilian settings, including violent video games. The chapter concludes by emphasizing the essential role that warriors fulfill in society, emphasizing their core duty to protect the innocent and defenseless, and to embrace the sheepdog's ethos when confronting the wolf.

Developments in armaments have consistently aimed to exceed the limitations imposed by human physical and psychological capacities.

This section explores the concept that the development of weapons has been a compensatory measure for the natural limitations in human mental and bodily abilities. Grossman charts the progression of armaments, highlighting how each development offered improved means for combat engagement. This evolution, he argues, demonstrates humanity's relentless determination to master the intricacies of combat. However, he also emphasizes the significant progress often made in the field of psychological research.

Advancements in armaments have consistently been driven by the pursuit of superiority, speed, range, and protection.

Grossman describes the evolution of armaments as an unending quest for supremacy. The adoption of rudimentary tools like stones and spears marked a considerable progression from solely relying on hand-to-hand fighting. The advent of archery allowed for combat over greater distances, while the advent of cavalry and chariots improved the ability to move strategically during warfare. The pursuit of enhanced effectiveness in combat has led to the development of sophisticated weapons designed for precise devastation in modern warfare. The emphasis in contemporary warfare has shifted towards the psychological elements and the mindset of the fighters as progress in physical technology has plateaued.

Humans have an inherent aversion to ending the existence of their fellow beings.

Drawing on S.L.A. Marshall's studies and insights from numerous military professionals, Grossman argues that individuals possess a natural reluctance to end another person's life. The inherent biological characteristics we possess present a considerable challenge for individuals who aspire to participate in combat. He investigates various tactics and psychological methods that have historically empowered people to overcome their reluctance, including the establishment of organized formations and the assignment of leadership positions, as well as the modern military's implementation of intensive conditioning in their training regimens. He proposes that the mental foundations of human conflict and the ceremonial elements of animal interactions reflect instinctual responses that shape our behavior during confrontations.

Contemporary techniques for training have been crafted to enhance a fighter's ability to act quickly and decisively with deadly force.

This section explores the significant progress in military training throughout the 20th century, highlighting the improved mental conditioning techniques that substantially improved soldiers' performance in battle. The development of military training is described by Grossman, highlighting the transition from using round targets to employing human-shaped ones that appear without warning. The methods cultivate instinctual reactions that allow combatants to quickly react to threats without conscious deliberation. He argues that improvements in training have significantly increased the occurrence and accuracy of gunfire, thus transforming the nature of modern combat.

Advancements in the preparation of armed forces have had a significant impact on society.

This section explores the consequences of adopting training techniques initially designed for combat situations into mainstream media, resulting in an increasing number of youths who are becoming desensitized to acts of violence. Grossman argues that extensive exposure to violent material through media like TV, movies, and especially video games can make children less sensitive to violence, diminish their capacity for empathy, and increase their inclination towards aggression, drawing on findings from several prominent organizations including the American Medical Association and the American Psychological Association.

The unintended consequences of media depictions serving as a catalyst for deadly behavior.

Grossman suggests that certain video games employ conditioning techniques that are akin to those used in military preparation, yet they do not incorporate the corresponding moral and ethical guidance. This exposure, he contends, could desensitize children to aggressive conduct, reduce their ability to empathize with others, and increase the likelihood of them behaving violently. He argues that when children frequently engage with violent video games, it serves as a type of conditioning similar to that used in military preparation, which associates aggression with rewards and reduces their awareness of the consequences of violent acts. The rise in mass violence perpetrated by the youth is alarming, with many exhibiting a troubling proficiency akin to maneuvers and methods learned through video game play, leading to disastrous outcomes.

Creators of civilian media employ techniques similar to military training and psychological conditioning when developing violent video games.

This section of the text establishes a direct link between the training techniques employed for military personnel and the development of modern violent video games. Grossman emphasizes that the appeal of these games stems largely from their realistic graphics, captivating sound effects, and rewards for accurate shooting skills and successive target neutralizations, employing psychological strategies akin to military training that reduce natural inhibitions and increase deadly effectiveness. He argues that while these techniques are employed by the military with clear purpose and strict ethical guidelines, the civilian media inadvertently provides a type of "killology boot camp" for the youth, neglecting the potential consequences.

The responsibility of a warrior within society is to safeguard the vulnerable from being preyed upon.

The final section of the book highlights the essential characteristic of a warrior, which is an unwavering dedication to protecting those who are at risk. The writers use animal symbolism to illustrate the different roles within society, suggesting that warriors serve as guardians who shield the vulnerable from possible dangers. He cites historical fighters and chivalrous figures as exemplars for contemporary guardians, underscoring the significance of adhering to a moral code, upholding integrity, and practicing selflessness.

Individuals can be divided into three unique categories: the majority who resemble docile creatures, the aggressive predators, and the protective guardians.

Grossman uses a metaphor involving sheep, predators, and protectors to illustrate different roles within society, an idea sparked by anecdotes shared by a veteran of the Vietnam War. Numerous people possess an inherent gentleness and a compassionate disposition, yet they often fail to acknowledge the presence of malevolence. A minority of individuals, often compared to predatory wolves, prey on the susceptible with the aim of causing harm and exploiting them. People with a natural assertiveness and a profound instinctual drive often dedicate themselves to the preservation of communal safety. The author, Dave Grossman, suggests that warriors act as guardians, moving toward danger to shield others, much like sheepdogs who vigilantly defend their flock.

Contemporary fighters might view knights and warriors from bygone eras as paragons to emulate.

Grossman delves into the conduct of historical knights and paladins, exemplifying a code that esteemed courage, the protection of those who could not defend themselves, and a dedication to moral principles as the highest embodiment of the warrior spirit. He underscores the persistent applicability of the 22 principles detailed in Erasmus's 1503 manual, which remain pertinent for modern combatants. The tenets act as a constant guide for those on the path of the warrior, underscoring qualities such as unwavering conviction, moral integrity, continuous preparedness, and a commitment to the well-being of others.

Context

• Military mental preparedness techniques encompass a range of strategies and training methods designed to enhance a soldier's psychological readiness for combat situations. These techniques aim to cultivate mental resilience, focus, and decision-making skills under stress. They often involve simulated scenarios, stress inoculation training, and psychological conditioning to help individuals overcome fear, hesitation, and emotional barriers during high-pressure situations. By incorporating these techniques into training regimens, military personnel can develop the mental fortitude necessary to perform effectively in challenging and potentially life-threatening environments.
• The term "sheepdog's ethos" is a concept popularized by author Dave Grossman in his book "On Combat." It symbolizes the mindset of individuals who see themselves as protectors, akin to sheepdogs guarding a flock. This ethos emphasizes the duty to defend the vulnerable and confront threats, drawing parallels between the roles of protectors in society and the instincts of sheepdogs in safeguarding sheep. It underscores the idea of selfless protection and a willingness to confront danger for the greater good.
• S.L.A. Marshall was a military historian and author known for his studies on combat behavior and the psychology of soldiers during World War II. His work focused on understanding the factors that influence individual soldiers' willingness to engage in combat and the effectiveness of military training methods. Marshall's research often delved into the emotional and psychological aspects of warfare, shedding light on the complexities of human behavior in high-stress environments.
• The link between military training techniques and video game development is a concept explored in the text, suggesting that certain violent video games utilize conditioning methods similar to those used in military training. This connection is drawn to highlight how exposure to such games may desensitize individuals to violence and impact their behavior. The text discusses how these games can inadvertently mimic aspects of military preparation without the corresponding ethical guidance. It emphasizes that while military training has clear objectives and guidelines, civilian media may not provide the same context or oversight when incorporating similar psychological strategies.
• The metaphor involving sheep, predators, and protectors is used to illustrate different societal roles: the majority who are passive and vulnerable like sheep, the minority who are aggressive and predatory like wolves, and the few who are protective and vigilant like sheepdogs. This metaphor highlights the idea that there are individuals who are inclined to harm others, those who are unaware or passive, and those who actively work to protect and defend the vulnerable. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing and embodying the role of protectors in society to safeguard against potential dangers and threats. The concept underscores the duty of individuals to act as guardians, displaying courage and selflessness in ensuring the safety and well-being of others.