PDF Summary:Never Pay the First Bill, by Marshall Allen

With exorbitant healthcare costs and frequent billing errors plaguing patients, it's crucial to be an informed and vigilant consumer. In Never Pay the First Bill, Marshall Allen equips readers with essential tools to challenge erroneous medical charges and lower their healthcare expenses.

In this comprehensive guide, Allen walks readers through strategies for meticulously examining medical bills, verifying charges, and effectively disputing unwarranted fees. He also recommends methods for proactively managing healthcare to avoid unnecessary costs altogether. For employers, the book offers advice on reforming healthcare purchasing practices to secure fair pricing through negotiation and oversight.

(continued)...

Individuals are encouraged to engage in discussions with their healthcare providers and inquire about alternative treatments that may be less complex or more cost-effective.

Allen advises individuals to adopt a critical attitude when attending doctor appointments. Individuals are encouraged to examine the fundamental components of the recommended treatments, which encompass all the tests and medications prescribed.

Patients should inquire regarding other treatment options that may provide similar advantages but with reduced complexity or at a lower cost. Individuals ought to carefully evaluate the potential risks and negative outcomes associated with recommended medical treatments.

Context

• Seeking a second opinion can provide additional perspectives on treatment options, potentially revealing less invasive or costly alternatives.
• Engaging critically can help catch potential errors or oversights in treatment plans, which are not uncommon in complex healthcare systems.
• Patients should inquire whether the recommended treatments are supported by current research and guidelines.
• This approach involves patients actively participating in their healthcare decisions, ensuring that their values and preferences are considered alongside medical advice.
• Evaluating risks is crucial for patient safety, as it helps avoid unnecessary procedures that might lead to complications or adverse effects.

Individuals seeking medical advice should turn to reputable organizations, for instance, the Task Force for Preventive Services in the United States.

When considering recommended medical procedures, Allen recommends consulting with autonomous health entities like the American Task Force for Preventive Services. This collective of uncompensated experts conducts in-depth analyses of medical research and formulates evidence-based advice for various types of health screenings, as well as proposing strategies for prevention and treatment.

He shares a story about a time when his wife, who was 48, received a recommendation to undergo a breast cancer screening, which is generally recommended for women who are at an increased risk of contracting the disease before they turn 50. Allen's spouse's decision to forego the mammogram resulted in her doctor questioning her decision.

Allen recommends seeking medical advice from truly impartial experts who base their recommendations on scientific evidence, rather than from those with potential financial gains linked to the patient's health care choices.

Practical Tips

• Create a digital folder on your computer or cloud service labeled "Health Resources" where you can save bookmarks and documents from reputable medical organizations. This way, when you need medical advice, you have a go-to repository of trusted information. For example, you could have a PDF from the Task Force for Preventive Services on recommended screenings and a bookmark to their website for easy access.
• Develop a habit of conducting monthly check-ins with your health status using a symptom checker tool provided by an autonomous health entity. Input your symptoms and concerns into the tool, and it will suggest potential medical procedures or tests you might need. Keep a journal to document any recurring health issues and the suggested procedures, and discuss these with your healthcare provider during your next visit.
• Use a health tracking app to set reminders for regular self-examinations and screenings. Many apps allow you to input personal and family medical history, which can help you stay on top of recommended screenings. Set up monthly reminders for self-exams and schedule future appointments for clinical screenings, ensuring you don't miss important health checks.
• Develop a set of personalized health criteria to guide your medical decisions. Think about what factors are most important to you, such as the potential benefits and risks of a procedure, your family history, or your lifestyle. Use these criteria whenever you're faced with a health decision to help you make choices that are consistent with your priorities.
• Start a peer-to-peer health discussion group in your community to share experiences and advice on finding impartial medical advice. Use social media or community bulletin boards to organize monthly meetings where members can discuss how they evaluate healthcare providers and share tips on recognizing unbiased medical advice.

People can often cut their costs by avoiding the use of their insurance coverage.

Marshall Allen challenges the widespread assumption that insurance always results in the most cost-effective solution for medical costs, despite often reducing the financial strain on people. He underscores that the opaqueness of pricing and secretive deals may result in insurers being compelled to grapple with exorbitant charges set forth in their contracts with healthcare providers.

Individuals ought to assess the monetary consequences of paying with cash compared to the costs tied to participation in insurance programs and think about utilizing platforms such as GoodRx.

Allen advises people to ask about the expenses they will have to pay themselves for medical procedures, tests, or medications. Individuals who have high deductibles may find that the costs they cover out-of-pocket are often substantially less than the prices established via their insurance plans.

He recommends using GoodRx.com, a website that aggregates prices from pharmacies across the country and provides coupons for discounts. He offers examples showing that patients often spend less when they pay cash for generic drugs instead of using their insurance to pay for them.

Other Perspectives

• The peace of mind and financial protection provided by insurance in the event of unexpected, high-cost medical events can outweigh the potential savings from paying cash for routine or minor healthcare services.
• Relying on cash payments for medical expenses may not be feasible for chronic conditions that require consistent, long-term treatment, where the cumulative costs could far exceed what an individual would pay with insurance coverage.
• The focus on individual responsibility for cost assessment may overlook the broader systemic issues that contribute to high healthcare costs and the need for more comprehensive solutions.
• The prices listed on GoodRx.com might not always be the most current or accurate, potentially leading to unexpected costs at the point of sale.
• Some pharmacies may choose not to accept coupons from GoodRx, limiting the usefulness of the service for certain individuals.
• Using insurance to pay for generic drugs can provide a clear record of medication history, which can be beneficial for continuity of care and for the patient's medical records.

Patients may have the chance to negotiate lower prices with healthcare providers if they propose to settle their accounts with cash.

Allen recommends that patients negotiate cash payments and actively engage in dialogue with healthcare services to decrease their expenses. He notes that many healthcare providers frequently offer reduced rates to individuals who settle their bills with cash, thus circumventing the complexities and waiting periods associated with insurance claim processing.

Context

• Some healthcare providers may have policies or legal constraints that affect their ability to offer cash discounts, which can vary by region and type of service.
• Providers may be more willing to negotiate with patients who demonstrate financial hardship, offering reduced rates or payment plans to ensure they receive some payment rather than none.
• Cash payments are immediate, providing healthcare providers with quicker access to funds compared to the delayed reimbursement process of insurance claims.

Individuals should thoroughly scrutinize their medical bills to spot any inaccuracies or unwarranted fees.

This section underscores the criticality of meticulously examining medical invoices and related insurance paperwork to identify any errors or unjustified fees, which is a vital component of proactive financial management. Allen emphasizes the alarming regularity of fraudulent practices in healthcare spending, along with the inability of insurance companies to address these problems adequately.

Individuals are advised to meticulously examine their itemized statements and summaries of benefits in order to identify any charges that may be incorrect.

Allen advises people to carefully review their explanation of benefits (EOBs) and detailed billing statements to ensure the accuracy of the charges itemized. Individuals ought to contrast the specified medical procedures and interventions with the actual services they received during their healthcare.

He emphasizes how insurance companies commonly process claims using automated systems that rely on the accuracy of information from healthcare providers, yet seldom verify the services were actually provided. This lax oversight creates opportunities for fraudulent billing schemes and accidental errors to slip through unchecked.

Other Perspectives

• The advice assumes that all individuals have received sufficient education on how to read and understand their EOBs and billing statements, which may not be the case, leading to a disparity in who can effectively follow this advice.
• Some medical procedures are complex and may involve steps that patients are not aware of, making it difficult for them to determine if all listed services were necessary.
• Patients themselves can be a part of the verification process; by reviewing their EOBs and billing statements, they can report discrepancies, which in turn helps insurance companies maintain accuracy in their records.
• The statement may overgeneralize the practices of insurance companies, as some insurers do conduct random or targeted audits to verify the accuracy of claims and services provided.

Patients and their employers can work together to reclaim money spent on healthcare expenses that were not justified or needed.

Allen recommends collaborating with businesses to pinpoint and correct errors and misleading tactics. Marshall Allen points to an instance where it was assumed that the health benefits program for New Jersey school employees went over its budget by approximately $130 million each year due to expenditures on services such as acupuncture, chiropractic care, and physical therapy that were provided outside of their approved network.

After the ProPublica exposé highlighted wasteful resource use, changes were implemented to reduce spending in the framework of the plan. He argues that firms handling healthcare costs must meticulously root out deceitful activities and confirm the accuracy of healthcare charges.

Context

• Health insurance plans typically have networks of approved providers. Receiving care outside of these networks can lead to higher out-of-pocket costs for patients and increased expenses for employers.
• Reports like the one from ProPublica can prompt policy changes and reforms by bringing attention to issues that may not be visible to the public or policymakers, leading to more efficient use of resources.
• The U.S. healthcare system is known for its high costs, often due to inefficiencies, overcharging, and unnecessary services. Investigative reports can highlight these issues, prompting stakeholders to take corrective action.
• Advanced data analytics and machine learning tools are increasingly being used to detect patterns of fraud and errors in healthcare billing. These technologies can help firms identify anomalies that may indicate deceptive practices.

The book offers guidance to business owners on revamping their methods for acquiring healthcare services.

This section addresses the critical role employers play in driving healthcare reform. Allen suggests that U.S. companies, bearing a significant portion of healthcare costs, have substantial untapped influence that could be leveraged to reduce costs and improve the value of healthcare services. He provides a blueprint, based on the achievements of Marilyn Bartlett in Montana, for employers to reform their healthcare purchasing practices.

Employers must address and settle the conflict of interests concerning insurance intermediaries.

Allen emphasizes the necessity for insurance brokers to prioritize the interests of the employer. Brokers are financially motivated through rewards and commissions provided by insurers, which are tied to the amount of premiums produced, leading to a scenario where brokers benefit monetarily as healthcare costs for companies rise.

Brokers often receive concealed financial rewards from insurers, which can undermine their neutrality.

Allen uncovers the common but often undisclosed strategy where brokers are financially rewarded and receive hidden commissions by insurance firms. He references instances where brokers receive extravagant presents, vacations, and monetary rewards for promoting specific insurance policies and achieving sales goals. He underscores the possibility that intermediaries may recommend insurance plans that may not be in the best interest of the companies they represent.

Other Perspectives

• Brokers are often required by law to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, including financial incentives, which would mitigate the issue of concealed rewards.
• The presence of hidden commissions does not necessarily mean that the recommended insurance policies are unsuitable for the clients.
• The rewards system could be structured in a way that it does not influence the neutrality of the brokers, such as flat commissions for any policy sold, regardless of the insurer.
• The insurance industry is competitive, and brokers who consistently fail to act in their clients' best interests are likely to lose business to more client-focused competitors.

Companies ought to prioritize establishing partnerships with brokers who are remunerated exclusively through transparent and direct fees.

Allen advocates for a shift in the way employers work with insurance intermediaries, moving towards a partnership model where compensation is based exclusively on fees, rather than the traditional commission-based system. Employers incentivize these brokers with a fixed remuneration or a commission dependent on the savings they achieve, thus eliminating any possibility of a conflict of interest.

Practical Tips

• You can evaluate broker transparency by requesting a detailed breakdown of their fees and services. When you're in the market for a broker, don't just ask for the total cost. Instead, ask for an itemized list that shows exactly what you're paying for. This will help you understand the value you're getting and ensure that the fees are not hidden within the service charges.
• Consider discussing fee-based compensation with your insurance agent to explore if it could be a more transparent and aligned option for your needs. This conversation can help you understand the potential benefits and drawbacks of switching to a fee-based model from the perspective of both the client and the intermediary. You might find that your agent is open to a fee-based model, which could lead to a more client-focused approach to your insurance services.
• Use a task management app to set up a personal incentive system for completing household chores or projects. Assign points for routine tasks and larger point values for more significant achievements, like completing a home improvement project. Redeem these points for self-rewards, such as a movie night or a special purchase, to simulate the experience of earning fixed remuneration and performance-based commissions.
• Opt for brokers who are compensated through a flat fee rather than commission-based structures. Research and compare different brokers to find those who offer flat-fee services, which can align their interests more closely with yours, as their earnings are not dependent on the frequency or size of your transactions.

Employers can leverage their purchasing power to secure fair pricing for medical services.

Allen argues that employers must take a more proactive and assertive approach in negotiations over healthcare expenses with providers. He is of the opinion that employers, as significant buyers of healthcare, ought to acknowledge their influence and confront the sector's non-transparent pricing strategies.

Organizations have the option to implement pricing models that are based on established benchmarks, aligning their payment approaches with those set by the federal Medicare program.

He recommends adopting a pricing strategy that mirrors the method Marilyn Bartlett applied to Montana state employees' healthcare program, which is grounded on recognized standards. This method determines healthcare service payments by including a margin above Medicare rates, which stops hospitals from indiscriminately increasing their fees.

Context

• Implementing such models may face challenges, including resistance from providers and the need for robust data systems to track and manage payments effectively.
• Widespread adoption of Medicare-based pricing could influence broader healthcare policy discussions, potentially leading to reforms aimed at standardizing healthcare costs across the board.
• The strategy reflects a broader trend in healthcare towards value-based care, where payments are more closely tied to the quality and efficiency of services rather than volume.
• By setting payments slightly above Medicare rates, this method ensures hospitals receive fair compensation while preventing excessive overcharging that can occur with unregulated pricing.

Businesses can negotiate direct agreements with healthcare providers, thereby circumventing the extra charges typically levied by insurance companies.

In addition to adopting pricing models based on benchmarking, Allen suggests forming direct agreements with healthcare providers to circumvent middlemen and preclude the associated extra expenses. Businesses can initiate negotiations to establish equitable costs with service providers.

Context

• Direct agreements can result in significant cost savings for businesses, as they avoid the markups and administrative fees typically added by insurance companies.
• Businesses can tailor healthcare services to better meet the specific needs of their employees, rather than relying on one-size-fits-all insurance plans.
• Armed with benchmarking data, businesses have stronger leverage in negotiations with healthcare providers, as they can present evidence of standard market rates.

Employers must carefully monitor healthcare spending to safeguard against fraudulent activities and avoid unnecessary expenses.

The book's final section underscores the importance of businesses meticulously examining their healthcare plans' costs to identify any fraudulent or unwarranted charges. Allen argues that insurance carriers often fail to thoroughly scrutinize fraudulent activities due to a lack of financial incentive, leading to significant financial harm for employers.

Employers should analyze claims data to identify suspicious billing patterns and take action

He advises companies to take the initiative in obtaining and scrutinizing their billing data, meticulously analyzing payment patterns to identify any potential irregularities in billing practices. Employers can detect potential dishonesty and overbilling by meticulously scrutinizing those healthcare providers who frequently engage in an unusually large volume of services, conduct uncommon procedures, and impose exorbitant fees.

Context

• Employers can work closely with insurance providers to share insights from claims data analysis, enhancing overall efforts to combat healthcare fraud.
• There are specialized software and tools available that can assist employers in analyzing billing data efficiently, helping to identify patterns that might not be obvious through manual review.
• Ensuring accurate billing can lead to better healthcare outcomes for employees, as it helps maintain trust in the healthcare system and ensures they receive necessary care without unnecessary procedures.
• Overbilling and fraudulent claims can lead to higher insurance premiums for employers and employees, as insurance companies pass on the costs of these claims to their clients.
• Employers often hire third-party auditors to review claims data. These auditors specialize in identifying irregularities and can provide an additional layer of scrutiny to detect potential fraud.
• Understanding the regulatory environment, including laws like the False Claims Act, can empower employers to take appropriate action against fraudulent billing practices.

Businesses can collaborate with specialized firms to reclaim money mistakenly allocated to fraudulent or inflated healthcare expenses.

Allen recommends that companies work in partnership with specialized firms dedicated to identifying and recovering money misspent due to healthcare fraud or unjustified expenses. Experts with the necessary skills can scrutinize claims data, initiate discussions with healthcare entities, and pursue legal action when required.

Context

• Partnering with specialized firms can be cost-effective for businesses, as these firms may work on a contingency basis, taking a percentage of the recovered funds, thus minimizing upfront costs.
• Engaging with healthcare providers often requires negotiation skills to resolve disputes over billing practices. This can involve discussing discrepancies, seeking clarifications, and reaching settlements without resorting to litigation.
• Beyond recovery, these firms may also help businesses implement preventive measures to avoid future instances of healthcare fraud.