PDF Summary:Math with Bad Drawings, by Ben Orlin

In Math with Bad Drawings, Ben Orlin delves into the essence and evolution of mathematics. The first part explores how math involves not just problem-solving but creatively setting logical rules—and then investigating their outcomes. Orlin examines how mathematical models capture real-world complexities, and how probability and statistics help us make sense of uncertainty.

The second part looks at how math has progressed historically in response to societal needs and constraints, from shaping voting systems and tax policies, to advancing science and technology. Orlin also illustrates how teaching methods influence our perception and appreciation of mathematics. Throughout, he discusses the limitations of quantitative methods while advocating for their thoughtful application.

(continued)...

Mathematics reflects our fundamental beliefs and approaches to understanding and solving problems.

Orlin posits that the way a society engages with mathematical concepts mirrors its core principles and its methods for tackling challenges. He observes that in the United States, there's a preference for definitive answers and uncomplicated results, fostering a liking for the simplicity and potency of concise, compelling reasoning. This also applies to the admiration for the beauty of well-crafted structures such as trusses, which represent robustness and practicality while lacking any superfluous components. Societies obsessed with speed and external validation might emphasize rote memorization and fast calculation, while those valuing deeper understanding and collaborative problem-solving might prioritize conceptual understanding and creative exploration.

Other Perspectives

• While mathematics has indeed evolved in response to practical needs, it can also be argued that many mathematical advancements were the result of theoretical exploration rather than direct practical application. Pure mathematics often progresses independently of immediate practical concerns.
• The assertion that mathematics is shaped by cultural and governmental contexts might overlook the universality of mathematical truths, which hold regardless of cultural or political influences.
• The role of mathematics in driving forward progress in science and technology could be seen as overstated by those who believe that empirical science and technological innovation can occur independently of mathematical advances.
• The impact of societal perception and teaching methods on social interactions might not account for individual differences in learning styles and the intrinsic motivation of students, which can also significantly influence mathematical understanding.
• The framing of mathematics in education as influencing students' views might not fully consider the role of innate interest and aptitude, which can lead students to engage with mathematics in ways that are not solely determined by pedagogical approaches.
• The idea that mathematics reflects fundamental beliefs and approaches to problem-solving could be challenged by the notion that mathematics is a universal language with principles that apply regardless of individual or societal beliefs.

The utilization and limits of mathematical techniques and quantitative examination.

This section delves into the powerful role that numerical assessment and the use of mathematical representations play in interpreting the world around us, although they are not all-encompassing answers. Orlin emphasizes the need for critical thinking, careful interpretation, and an awareness of potential biases when applying quantitative methods.

Mathematical models and statistical analysis methods possess significant potential, but they also come with substantial limitations.

This section recommends prudent application of statistical techniques and mathematical structures to prevent overreliance. Orlin acknowledges the usefulness of these instruments for making intricate occurrences more comprehensible, while simultaneously highlighting their potential limitations. He underscores his point by exploring the way investment bankers assigned excessive value to complex financial instruments such as collateralized debt obligations and other derivative contracts prior to the 2008 financial crisis. The intricate models erroneously assumed independence among housing markets, when in reality, a web of interconnections existed between numerous mortgages. This failure to account for systemic risk, combined with overconfidence in the models' predictive power, led to catastrophic consequences.

Essential reductions and broad strokes aid in making models more comprehensible, but they can also distort how we view reality.

Orlin underscores that mathematical models reduce the intricacies of the real world to more fundamental shapes. These assumptions may not align perfectly with actual conditions and can result in inaccuracies. The model referred to as the Gaussian copula, which was used to assess the value of CDOs, was based on the assumption that defaults would conform to a normal distribution—an assumption that proved disastrously incorrect when the housing market failed. Economists who use models with continuous variables might miss the distinct features of real transactions by excessively reducing the complexity of the math. The capacity of the Earth to yield crops may be likened to a coiled spring in a simplified analogy, yet this comparison may not fully account for the complexities, including the strategies farmers employ to improve soil quality through crop rotation. Understanding and simplifying intricate ideas to create practical frameworks is crucial, yet it's equally vital to acknowledge their limitations and the potential for them to distort our understanding of reality.

Overreliance on quantitative methods can lead to overconfidence and blind spots, particularly when dealing with complex, interdependent systems

This section of the book highlights the dangers of depending exclusively on numerical methods, particularly in contexts where the elements' interplay and their sensitivity to initial conditions play a crucial role. The 2008 financial crisis serves as a prime example of how catastrophic outcomes can result from depending on defective models and the mistaken belief that variables are not interdependent. Orlin broadens his concept to include the unpredictability of history, positing that the intricately interconnected nature of human society makes it impossible to forecast, as small alterations can lead to significant outcomes. He employs various analogies to understand historical complexity, including a cellular automaton that shows how simple rules can lead to intricate patterns, as well as the double pendulum, which is sensitive to initial conditions, and a geometric figure that reveals infinite complexity at every scale, suggesting that examining history requires a more nuanced approach than direct linear causation.

When utilizing mathematical concepts, it is essential to conduct a detailed analysis and consider them thoughtfully.

Orlin suggests that while statistical data provides valuable perspectives, it inevitably simplifies real-life complexities and fails to capture the full story. One must exercise caution when interpreting them, taking into account their limitations and potential biases. The initial view that concentrated exclusively on a baseball player's batting average evolved to include more sophisticated metrics that take into account a wider range of factors and offer improved forecasting power, such as metrics that measure the frequency a player gets on base and the power of their hits. Focusing solely on a single metric like the Challenge Index to assess school quality can result in unintended consequences, promoting system gaming and distorting educational goals. Ultimately, no quantitative metric can fully capture the intricate essence of an educational institution or a learner, requiring careful consideration and decisions that are specifically adapted to the unique circumstances.

Using numerical data to inform decisions requires a recognition of its intrinsic prejudices and possible pitfalls.

This section highlights the dangers linked to the incorrect application of statistical data, emphasizing the need for transparency and recognition of potential biases. Orlin illustrates through various examples how statistics can be manipulated or distorted to support preconceived notions.

Data can be cherry-picked, manipulated, or misinterpreted to support predetermined conclusions

Orlin explores the concept of "p-hacking," where researchers selectively report or manipulate data to achieve desired p-values, allowing them to present even dubious findings as "statistically significant." He illustrates his point by referencing his undergraduate thesis, which explored the tendency of children to bestow toys upon individuals who have experienced hardship. While his initial discoveries were not definitive, he managed to obtain a statistically significant set of results through the use of various analytical methods, considering numerous factors, and by examining different subsets until a noteworthy result was identified. Researchers may, despite their best intentions, inadvertently or intentionally manipulate data to support their own hypotheses.

Misinterpreting or misapplying mathematical equations and statistical analyses can lead to erroneous conclusions.

Orlin warns that the misuse or misinterpretation of even accurate mathematical equations and statistical analyses can result in incorrect conclusions. He underscores the example of four unique data clusters, collectively referred to as the quartet named after Anscombe, which, although they share identical statistical characteristics like average, variability, and interrelation, reveal significantly diverse configurations upon graphical depiction. This demonstrates that depending solely on aggregate numerical data can conceal significant patterns and subtleties present within the information. The misuse of mathematical methods in the financial industry is clear, as the dependence on a mathematical function that predicts the likelihood of events assuming a normal distribution has resulted in a substantial underestimation of the chances of mortgage defaults.

Quantitative methods may fail to capture important qualitative factors and human elements

Orlin argues that while quantitative methods can offer valuable insights, they often fail to capture important qualitative factors and human elements. A basic analysis of how often words are used could indicate stylistic variances between authors of different genders, yet it fails to capture the profound subtleties and significance embedded in their writings. Quantitative metrics like "customer satisfaction" or "employee engagement" offer a numerical perspective but fail to fully encapsulate the complex human experiences they aim to measure. Ultimately, expressing human actions as numbers might not adequately reflect the complex and subtle essence of individual stories and life occurrences.

Context

• The Gaussian copula is a mathematical model used to assess the risk of default in complex financial products like Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs). It assumes that defaults follow a normal distribution, but this assumption proved to be incorrect during the 2008 financial crisis. The reliance on the Gaussian copula led to a significant underestimation of the risk associated with CDOs, contributing to the severity of the crisis. This model's failure highlighted the limitations of using simplified mathematical models in assessing complex financial systems.
• P-hacking involves selectively analyzing data to achieve statistically significant results, potentially leading to misleading or false conclusions in research. Researchers may engage in practices like data dredging or cherry-picking to manipulate findings to support their hypotheses. This can undermine the credibility and reliability of scientific studies by introducing bias and distorting the interpretation of results. Awareness of p-hacking is crucial for maintaining the integrity of research and ensuring that conclusions are based on genuine statistical significance rather than manipulated data.
• The quartet named after Anscombe consists of four datasets that have nearly identical statistical properties but exhibit vastly different patterns when graphed. This quartet is used to emphasize the importance of visualizing data alongside statistical analysis to uncover nuances that numerical summaries may overlook. It highlights the limitations of relying solely on numerical summaries in understanding the complexity of data relationships. Anscombe's quartet serves as a cautionary example of the need for comprehensive data analysis that includes both quantitative and visual assessments.

Mathematics plays a crucial role in societal decision-making and is intertwined with various disciplines, influencing the governance and organization of society.

This part delves into how mathematics merges with various disciplines, underscoring its status as a ubiquitous language and its growing significance in influencing policies, institutions, and choices.

Math serves as a bridge linking various disciplines through its universal linguistic properties.

Orlin suggests that mathematics serves as a crucial interconnecting thread that weaves together various disciplines, rather than standing alone as an isolated field. Mathematics serves not only as an instrumental resource for scientists and engineers but also sheds light on diverse aspects of human life, such as linguistic patterns and the interactions within social networks.

Mathematical concepts and tools are crucial for deepening comprehension and tackling problems in many fields, particularly in the domain of natural sciences.

This section highlights the breadth of mathematics' applications, emphasizing its role in fields beyond the traditionally "mathy" ones. He underscores how knot theory is utilized to unravel the intricacies within DNA, delves into the role of probability and statistics in dissecting election outcomes and predicting economic trends, and points to the emerging field of "digital humanities," where quantitative techniques are employed to analyze vast assemblages of literary texts. He contends that such instances reveal the profound ability of mathematical reasoning to provide significant understanding into various events, encompassing not only the actions of physical objects but also the progression of human cognition and societal customs.

Mathematical thinking is a valuable skill in numerous professional fields and various domains.

This section highlights how mathematical reasoning is advantageous for individuals across various professions, extending beyond just the realm of mathematics. In today's world, where we are swamped with data and guided by algorithms, it's becoming more crucial to be able to sift through information, evaluate potential dangers, and make well-founded choices when certainty is not guaranteed, while also acknowledging the limitations inherent in numerical models. Orlin proposes that engaging in these cognitive exercises not only sharpens an individual's ability to tackle challenges but also fosters a deeper comprehension of intricate systems across various fields of work.

Interdisciplinary partnerships, especially those involving specialists from different areas and mathematicians, often lead to groundbreaking discoveries.

Orlin proposes that significant advancements frequently arise from the joint efforts of experts across various disciplines, including mathematicians. Einstein's revolutionary grasp of relativity was realized in collaboration with mathematicians who developed the essential mathematical frameworks that broke away from traditional Euclidean geometry. The creation of computers, ignited by Alan Turing's theoretical work on logical frameworks, necessitated joint efforts among mathematicians, logicians, and engineers to convert abstract ideas into tangible applications.

Mathematics plays a central role in shaping policies, institutions, and social structures

The section of the book delves into the significant influence that mathematics has on the decisions, structures, and policies shaping our everyday lives. Orlin underscores the significance of grasping the capabilities and limitations of quantitative analysis and mathematical models, particularly in light of their growing influence across sectors such as governance, business, and additional fields.

Numerical data and mathematical models are increasingly guiding decisions in sectors such as business and government.

This section underscores the increasing role mathematics plays in the formation of policies and decisions. Orlin underscores the influence of financial theories on policy-making, underscores the critical role of statistical evaluation in the health and law enforcement fields, and observes the increasing dominance of computational algorithms in hiring and loan approval procedures. He argues that while these methods can offer valuable insights, their complexity and potential for bias require careful scrutiny and a critical understanding of their strengths and limitations.

Mathematics plays a crucial role in the development of voting systems, tax frameworks, and other societal constructs.

This section delves into the way fundamental societal mechanisms are fundamentally structured by mathematical concepts. Orlin explores the Electoral College and illustrates that minor modifications to its structure, like adopting an approach where the victor receives all the votes, could drastically shift its intended function and result in unexpected consequences. The evolution of the United States' income tax from a simple three-tier structure to the complex, multi-level system of today illustrates how mathematical ideas, like the progressive characteristics of tax rates and the diminishing effect of each additional dollar earned, intertwine with political and economic realms.

Improving our understanding of the role that math plays in social situations can guide us toward decisions that are more knowledgeable and ethically sound.

Orlin's concluding point is that understanding the role mathematics plays in our society enables us to make decisions that are not only more knowledgeable but also ethically superior. It enables us to critically evaluate policies and decisions, questioning assumptions, recognizing potential biases, and advocating for more just and equitable systems. Grasping and engaging with the core principles, limits, and outcomes of mathematics is crucial, considering its increasing role in molding our reality, which empowers us to tackle problems using mathematical logic and to pose deeper inquiries, thus nurturing a better-educated community.

Other Perspectives

• While mathematics is indeed a universal language, not all disciplines rely on it to the same extent, and some areas of study, such as certain humanities or arts, may use it minimally or metaphorically rather than as a central analytical tool.
• The assertion that mathematics serves as a bridge between disciplines could be overstated for fields where qualitative analysis is more prevalent and where mathematical models may not capture the full complexity of the subject matter.
• The application of mathematical tools in various fields can sometimes lead to oversimplification of complex issues, especially when the nuances of human behavior or environmental factors are reduced to quantitative data.
• Mathematical thinking is indeed valuable, but it is not the only or always the most appropriate way to approach problems in professional fields; creativity, empathy, and other non-mathematical skills are also crucial.
• Interdisciplinary partnerships are valuable, but not all groundbreaking discoveries require mathematicians; many fields advance through the deepening of their own methods and theories without direct mathematical input.
• The role of mathematics in shaping policies and institutions can sometimes be problematic, as reliance on models and data can obscure value judgments or ethical considerations that are not easily quantifiable.
• The increasing reliance on numerical data and mathematical models in decision-making can lead to a "technocratic" approach where the human element is undervalued, and decisions may become too data-driven.
• Mathematical models, especially in the context of voting systems and tax frameworks, can be manipulated to serve particular interests, and their design is often as much about political choices as it is about mathematical fairness.
• A deeper understanding of mathematics can indeed lead to more informed decisions, but it is not a panacea; ethical decision-making also requires a broader understanding of social justice, human rights, and moral philosophy.