PDF Summary:How to Win Friends and Influence People, by Dale Carnegie
Book Summary: Learn the key points in minutes.
Below is a preview of the Shortform book summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie. Read the full comprehensive summary at Shortform.
1-Page PDF Summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People
Have you ever struggled to get someone to like you or listen to you? You may be going about it the wrong way. In How to Win Friends and Influence People, American writer and educator Dale Carnegie explains universal principles of interacting with other people to get them to like you and have them see your way of thinking. This isn’t about manipulation—it’s about sincerely appreciating people, believing they’re important, and treating them likewise. Using Carnegie’s advice, you can learn how to become a great conversationalist without saying anything, how to make other people feel important, and how to change other people’s minds without offending them.
In our guide, we’ll explain Carnegie’s fundamental principles of likability and influence. Then we’ll provide guidance on how to give feedback to others, followed by how to approach disagreements. Our commentary will add research to support Carnegie’s ideas, theories from other experts, and specific tips for implementing his advice.
(continued)...
(Shortform note: The order in which you give positive and negative feedback isn’t the only thing that affects its effectiveness and impact: The ratio of positive-to-negative feedback is also important. Research suggests that feedback is most effective in improving performance when the positive-to-negative ratio is around five or six to one. That means that for every negative piece of feedback you give, you should give five to six positive pieces of feedback. The positive feedback encourages people to keep up (and further improve) their high performance on things they’re already doing well, and the right amount of negative feedback helps them start doing something they should be doing or refrain from something they are doing but shouldn’t.)
Additionally, Carnegie advises that you let the other person know that you have high expectations of them because of their past performance, experience, or skills. Treat them as if the quality you’re encouraging is already something they do exceptionally well. This will compel them to live up to your high expectations to keep from disappointing you. For example, if you have an employee whose work has been lackluster lately, try saying, “You’ve always been a hard worker, and I believe you’ll continue showing this in the next month.”
(Shortform note: Research suggests that setting high expectations for people can improve their performance (known as the Pygmalion effect). However, experts note that when people feel they can’t meet the expectations that have been set for them, their performance suffers. By following Carnegie’s advice to establish a high expectation while simultaneously conveying that the person is already meeting that expectation, you can take advantage of the Pygmalion effect while also avoiding the pitfall of setting unrealistic, demotivating expectations.)
Soften the Blow
Carnegie also provides tactics for making feedback easier for others to accept. For starters, when approaching someone about a mistake they’ve made, be open about similar mistakes you’ve made. This communicates that you know how difficult the task can be.
(Shortform note: Another way to make others feel better about their mistakes is to point out that making mistakes can actually be a good thing. In The 5 Elements of Effective Thinking, Edward B. Burger and Michael Starbird explain that failure is a learning tool, as it allows you to advance your thinking through trial and error. When you fail or make a mistake, you can analyze why you failed and think about what you can do to prevent a similar mistake in the future. Advise the other person to view their mistake as an opportunity for growth and not to let it block their progress. This can both help them handle the feedback you’re currently giving them and improve their overall thinking habits.)
Also, when communicating what the other person should do with your feedback, ask questions instead of giving commands. Asking for their input makes them feel important and that they have a personal stake. Say things like “What do you think about this?” “Do you think that would work?” “Do you have any suggestions on how to improve things?”
(Shortform note: When you’re in a position of power over the person you’re giving feedback to, asking for their input can help both of you to avoid falling victim to authority bias—the tendency to believe information we receive from a source we view as an authority. This bias can cause people to conform to rules or instructions simply because they came from an authority figure, even if those rules or instructions are bad. So, in addition to making others feel important and giving them a personal stake, asking others for their input can help you ensure that you get the best ideas possible and that you’re not asking people to do things that are counterproductive or detrimental.)
Make It Sound Easy and Desirable
Carnegie also recommends that you act like the improvement you’re requesting is an easy endeavor. Make it clear that it’s not a matter of ability or talent, and as mentioned earlier, communicate that you’re confident they can do it. At the same time, exult in every small success to keep their spirits up. Say things like, “You already have the underlying skills, you just need a bit of practice.” Additionally, connect the improvement to something else they’ve already done, such as by saying, “If you can do this task, then you’re more than equipped to do this next one.” This will make the task feel less daunting and the other person more willing to try.
(Shortform note: Carnegie’s advice to act like the improvement will be easy, exult in small successes, and connect the improvement to something the person has already done are all ways to increase someone’s self-efficacy—the confidence that they can accomplish the goal you’re setting for them. Research shows that people with high self-efficacy are more interested in what they do, are more resilient in the face of setbacks, and have higher self-esteem. In contrast, people with low self-efficacy tend to get discouraged easily and avoid things that appear difficult. Encouraging people as Carnegie advises can both increase the chances that they’ll be able to implement your feedback and improve their overall well-being.)
Finally, communicate the improvement in terms of the person’s own interests. As earlier discussed, people are mostly interested in themselves, so let them know how they could benefit from applying your feedback. Target what they care about (such as doing better work, getting off work earlier, making more money, or ascending in their career) and provide incentives that match those desires.
(Shortform note: Appealing to others’ interests when giving them feedback can help you form a stronger connection. This is because you reduce the valuational social distance between you, or the degree to which you value the same things. Research shows that the higher the social distance in an interaction, the more abstractly we tend to think. So if your efforts to appeal to another person aren’t working, try communicating with them in more concrete terms that relate to their desires—this will make it easier for them to understand what you’re offering them.)
How to Approach Arguments
Getting others to like you and giving them feedback without harming their sense of importance will get you far in life. However, sometimes you’ll run into conflicts with others that can’t be resolved without having a discussion or an argument. If done poorly, these disagreements can interfere with your relationships or what you and others need to accomplish. Carnegie provides some techniques for how you can approach disagreements without undoing your efforts to win people over.
Listen
First and foremost, Carnegie advises you to listen well. Let the other person fully express their point of view. Do not interrupt as they’re speaking, and don’t argue. This is not only a way to earn their favor, as mentioned earlier, but it also helps you connect with the other person in a disagreement.
Additionally, Carnegie emphasizes that you should be gentle in how you present your argument to the other person. If you attack them or their perspective, you’ll insult their sense of importance, and they won’t want to listen to you. Instead, keep the discussion relaxed and casual. Don’t lose your temper. Staying calm and collected reflects well on your character, whereas losing control makes you seem petty and small.
(Shortform note: You’re more likely to interrupt, argue, attack the other person’s perspective, or lose your temper if you approach the disagreement with a combative mindset. In The Anatomy of Peace, the Arbinger Institute explains that a combative mindset is characterized by biased, self-focused viewpoints that lead us to worsen conflicts instead of cooperating to resolve them. This mindset may come from a feeling of superiority, inferiority, entitlement, or a desire to be seen in a positive light. Overcome your combative mindset by being aware of your triggers and reactions, then recalling situations where you reacted positively. This can help you shift perspective and see the conflict through a different, more productive lens.)
Next, ask questions. Carnegie says that if you enter an argument by pointing out what others are doing wrong, or simply asserting that they are wrong, you’ll harm their sense of importance and make them less receptive to your point of view. Instead, get people’s input on what problems you’re facing and what solutions they’d recommend. Just like asking questions when giving feedback, this makes the other person feel important. It also allows them to reason through the issue on their own without you imposing your point of view—and they may just come around to your point of view without you having to argue at all.
(Shortform note: Asking questions of the person you’re arguing with can help to guide you through a conflict, but asking yourself questions can also be beneficial. For example, asking yourself if you can accurately communicate the other person’s idea can help ensure you truly understand their stance, which is essential for a productive discussion. If you can’t, you likely need to listen better as they express their point of view, as Carnegie advises. Additionally, asking yourself what would happen if you’re wrong can help you identify if this discussion is actually necessary—if the only downside of being wrong is that your ego would be hurt, then it’s time to move on from the disagreement.)
Be Understanding
Carnegie recommends that you make an effort during the disagreement to understand the other person’s argument and to express that understanding to them. To do this, empathize with the other person’s perspective, and make a genuine effort to consider their view of the situation. Then express sympathy for their situation and their perspective. Acknowledge that their feelings and opinions are valid, and let them know you’d feel the same way in their position.
(Shortform note: Carnegie recommends both empathy and sympathy in showing others that you understand their perspective, but it can be hard to tell these two apart. While people often use them to mean the same thing, experts describe empathy as feeling the emotions another person’s feeling, and they define sympathy as a feeling of concern for another person. Both empathy and sympathy can help someone feel validated, but try to avoid showing pity—a more shallow feeling that can come across as patronizing. To make sure the other person feels validated, avoid saying things like, “Your situation isn’t that bad,” or, “You’re being dramatic.” Instead, say things like, “That sounds very difficult,” or, “That would upset me too.”)
Carnegie also advises that you avoid telling the other person they’re wrong, and allow for the possibility that you could be wrong. Then explore the facts, and if it turns out that you are wrong, admit it quickly and graciously. Acknowledge that you made a mistake and make it clear that you want to make it right. Carnegie says this will disarm the other person and preemptively assuage any hostility they may feel.
(Shortform note: Following Carnegie’s advice to admit when you’re wrong can be difficult. When your actions (such as a mistake) conflict with your image of yourself (that you’re highly capable), it can cause cognitive dissonance. This is a stressful feeling that comes from trying to hold onto two conflicting ideas. The discomfort from this dissonance can lead you to deny or justify your mistake rather than change your view of yourself, which can be rewarding in the short term: It increases feelings of self-esteem and control. However, in the long term, it can harm your relationships and reduce your ability to grow and learn from your errors. In contrast, admitting mistakes shows others that they too can admit their mistakes without fear of blame.)
Additionally, says Carnegie, try to find things you agree on so you can establish a connection with the other person. Talk about common goals, and appeal to values like honesty and fairness. For example, if you’re having a disagreement with your roommate about keeping your shared living space clean, highlight some things you both agree are undesirable—such as pests, clutter, and expired food in the fridge. Emphasize that you know they want a fair division of housework, and that you want to share the responsibility equally so you can both enjoy the things you’ve agreed you want—a pest-free home, room to do activities, and a clean fridge.
Finally, express gratitude to the other person for disagreeing with you. Carnegie says that by devoting time to engage with you, they’ve shown that they care about the same things you do. Consider them allies who are trying to aid you rather than enemies trying to harm you.
(Shortform note: Appealing to common values and expressing gratitude to others for disagreeing are both qualities of a cooperative mindset—the opposite of the combative mindset described earlier. In The Anatomy of Peace, the Arbinger Institute explains that the cooperative mindset involves removing your biases, seeing others as people instead of objects, and acting according to your conscience. If you’re doing these things and still having trouble getting through to someone, try building relationships with other people who also want to help that person, nurture your relationship with that person so you can better understand them, and model trusting, unbiased behaviors they can emulate.)
Want to learn the rest of How to Win Friends and Influence People in 21 minutes?
Unlock the full book summary of How to Win Friends and Influence People by signing up for Shortform .
Shortform summaries help you learn 10x faster by:
- Being 100% comprehensive: you learn the most important points in the book
- Cutting out the fluff: you don't spend your time wondering what the author's point is.
- Interactive exercises: apply the book's ideas to your own life with our educators' guidance.
Here's a preview of the rest of Shortform's How to Win Friends and Influence People PDF summary: