PDF Summary:How to Solve It, by G. Polya

Solving problems is an essential life skill. In How to Solve It, G. Polya teaches educators and students a four-step approach to methodically working through challenges of any kind. The first step is gaining a thorough grasp of the problem. Next, devise a plan by finding connections to known strategies or relevant knowledge. Once a plan is in place, execute it rigorously and verify each step. Through examples and practice problems, Polya demonstrates how this universal method can be applied beyond mathematics to logic puzzles and real-world scenarios.

Polya also outlines key responsibilities for teachers. An effective educator must tailor their guidance to each student, neither leaving them stranded nor offering too many answers. By suggesting questions rather than solutions, teachers foster students' ability to independently navigate challenges—a skill that transcends disciplines.

(continued)...

Context

• Visual representations can aid in memory retention by creating a visual memory trace, which can be more easily recalled than abstract information.
• By breaking down complex problems into simpler visual elements, individuals can focus on one aspect at a time, making it easier to manage and solve multifaceted issues.
• Visual aids can assist in identifying patterns or symmetries that might not be immediately obvious through numerical or verbal descriptions alone.
• Diagrams can serve as a universal language, making it easier to communicate ideas and solutions to others who may not share the same verbal language proficiency.

Utilizing existing knowledge is crucial in formulating an effective strategy and establishing links.

After grasping the nature of the problem, the next critical step is to devise a plan of action. Determining the appropriate method to tackle a problem is not always immediately clear, as Polya points out. He compares the effort to constructing a bridge that spans from the realm of the unfamiliar to the domain of established truths, a task that requires creativity and frequently presents challenges in establishing connections.

Drawing on comparable problems and established theorems as a guide to resolving the issue is a crucial strategy.

Polya encourages individuals facing challenges to leverage their existing knowledge by asking if a comparable situation comes to mind. Do you know of any theorem that could be helpful? The challenge lies in pinpointing the truly relevant information from a vast assortment of possible issues. He recommends focusing attention on the aspect that remains elusive, encouraging close scrutiny. Consider a past challenge you've encountered that shares a comparable aspect or puzzle. This method emphasizes tackling problems that share a similar goal or outcome, thereby increasing the likelihood of discovering methods or insights transferable to various contexts.

A learner tasked with determining the centroid of a uniform tetrahedron might draw upon their previous experience of locating the centroid of a uniform triangle. The focus on the pivotal balance point serves as an exemplar when tackling the complex issues of spatial depth and form.

Context

• Leveraging existing knowledge in this way can reduce cognitive load, as it allows individuals to use familiar frameworks rather than starting from scratch.
• The ability to focus on relevant details while ignoring irrelevant ones is crucial. This involves training oneself to filter out distractions and concentrate on the core elements of the problem.
• Close scrutiny of difficult aspects can also help in identifying errors or misconceptions in one's understanding, allowing for correction and deeper learning.
• Recalling past challenges and how they were overcome can build confidence and resilience, reducing anxiety and improving performance when facing new problems.
• This method can be particularly useful in interdisciplinary fields, where solutions from one domain can be adapted to solve problems in another, fostering innovation and cross-pollination of ideas.
• Both problems involve finding a point of equilibrium, which requires understanding symmetry and balance, concepts that are foundational in geometry.
• Understanding the centroid helps in developing spatial reasoning skills, which are crucial for visualizing and solving problems involving three-dimensional objects.

Deconstructing the issue into less complex segments and subsequently integrating them, while also employing a method of comparative examination, is crucial in developing a strategy.

Polya highlights different tactics that can aid in developing a plan.

• Incorporating new elements like lines, points, or different perspectives often reveals previously unseen connections, simplifying the path to a solution. He suggests that individuals facing challenges should consider adding a new element to make the path to a solution easier. Introducing a fresh component to the problem ought to be purposeful, aiming specifically to enhance the balance of the dilemma or to associate it with a recognized problem-solving technique.

• Breaking Down and Reassembling: This entails deconstructing the issue into less complex, more approachable sub-problems, or organizing its components in a novel manner. Polya suggests focusing on a specific element of the problem's parameters to examine how it influences the outcome, including the precise characteristics of the outcome and the different manners in which it could vary. This approach may reveal the necessity for additional components or the establishment of beneficial intermediary phases.

• Exploring similar challenges across various disciplines can offer a structure to guide the methodology for resolving problems. Polya suggests contemplating a simpler, yet related problem or imagining a less intricate issue that shares similarities. The fundamental tactic involves identifying a problem that, despite differing in particular details, possesses a common framework or method for formulating a resolution.

Context

• Changing perspectives can mean looking at a problem from a different angle or using a different method, such as algebraic instead of geometric reasoning. This can uncover solutions that were not apparent from the original viewpoint.
• Associating a problem with a recognized problem-solving technique means aligning it with established methods or strategies that have been proven effective. This could involve using known mathematical theorems, logical frameworks, or heuristic approaches that provide a clear pathway to a solution.
• Cognitive psychology suggests that the human brain processes information more efficiently when it is divided into smaller, manageable chunks, a concept known as "chunking," which aids in memory and understanding.
• In problem-solving, parameters are the variables or conditions that define the scope and constraints of a problem. By isolating and examining these parameters, one can understand their direct impact on the outcome, allowing for targeted adjustments that can lead to a solution.
• Exposure to various disciplines encourages the exchange of ideas, which can lead to innovative solutions. Techniques from computer science, like algorithms, can be applied to optimize processes in logistics.
• This approach involves using analogies to draw parallels between the current problem and simpler ones. By understanding how a solution was reached in a similar, less complex situation, one can apply the same principles to the current problem.

Executing the strategy and vigilantly tracking its advancement necessitates diligence, meticulousness, and the capacity for self-evaluation.

Once a strategy has been devised, the next step is to carry it out. This requires a shift in viewpoint, moving from a wide-ranging and investigative approach to a focused and systematic completion of the task.

Every step taken during problem-solving must be exact, and openness to different approaches that could yield a solution is crucial for successful execution.

Polya emphasizes the importance of rigorously assessing the validity of every phase in the process of solving a problem. Can we verify the correctness of this assertion? He encourages a balanced method that merges intuitive comprehension with methodical verification, underscoring the necessity of not just intuitively recognizing the legitimacy of each step but possessing the ability to rigorously justify it as well. He also recommends confirming the solution by exploring different approaches that lead to the identical outcome. Does the answer to the problem become clear to you right away? This method reduces the chance of errors while also deepening understanding and revealing possible connections between different mathematical concepts.

Practical Tips

• Create a problem-solving journal to meticulously document each step you take when addressing an issue. Start by clearly defining the problem, then list all potential solutions, and finally, detail the exact steps you'll take to implement the chosen solution. This practice encourages precision and allows you to review and refine your problem-solving process over time.
• Implement a 'Flip the Script' week where you deliberately reverse your decision-making process. If your instinct is to say no, consider yes, and vice versa. This doesn't mean making reckless choices but rather giving yourself the space to explore the potential of the opposite of your initial reaction. This can apply to small decisions like trying a new genre of movie or more significant ones like volunteering for a project outside your expertise at work.
• Use a timer to practice the habit of pausing for reflection during problem-solving. Set a timer for regular intervals, such as every 15 minutes, while working on a task. When the timer goes off, take a moment to review the actions you've taken so far and evaluate their effectiveness. This will help you avoid getting too absorbed in the process without assessing the validity of your approach.
• Develop a habit of playing "devil's advocate" with yourself once a week. Choose a recent decision or belief and spend time arguing against your own position. This exercise forces you to methodically question your intuitive conclusions and can reveal biases or assumptions that need reevaluation.
• Create a decision journal to track the reasoning behind your choices. Whenever you make a significant decision, write down what you believe to be the legitimate steps that led to it and why you think they're justified. Over time, review your journal to assess the accuracy of your intuition and the strength of your justifications.
• You can test the robustness of your decisions by using the "Five Whys" technique to ensure different paths lead to the same solution. Start with the decision you've made and ask "Why?" five times, each time using the answer to the previous question as the basis for the next. This can reveal if the underlying reasons for your decision are consistent and if they converge on the same conclusion from different angles.
• Use a buddy system for mutual accountability on tasks that are prone to errors. Pair up with a friend or colleague and agree to check each other's work or decisions for mistakes. This could be as simple as having them review an important email for typos or double-checking your calculations on a budget plan. The fresh set of eyes can catch errors you might have missed, and discussing the task can lead to better strategies to avoid similar mistakes in the future.
• Engage in math-based storytelling to make abstract concepts concrete. Write short stories or scenarios that incorporate mathematical principles. For example, if you're trying to understand probability, you could write a story about a game show contestant choosing between different doors, each with a different probability of winning a prize. This narrative approach can help you visualize and solidify the connections between mathematical concepts in a real-world context.

Employing various problem-solving techniques across a range of sample challenges and unique categories of issues.

Polya demonstrates his heuristic methods through their application to challenges that vary widely, encompassing straightforward arithmetic conundrums as well as complex geometric designs. He demonstrates that such fundamental principles are widely applicable to a diverse array of problems, regardless of their type.

The book presents a variety of mathematical problems, including those that necessitate construction and proof, and demonstrates different strategies to tackle these issues.

Polya delves into various types of problems, illustrating how a consistent array of inquiries and strategies can assist in resolving them. He distinguishes between problems that require identifying a specific element or quantity and those that aim to demonstrate the truth or falsehood of a particular claim. He customizes his approach by asking questions specifically designed to suit the unique characteristics of the issue being addressed, underscoring the significance of flexibility in the problem-solving journey. In the process of theorem validation, one might focus on deriving meaningful conclusions from the given premises instead of questioning the utility of the existing information.

In tasks that require creating geometric figures, it's essential to start by visualizing the desired outcome and then work backwards from the final objective.

Polya emphasizes the significance of employing visual techniques in tackling issues pertaining to geometric shapes. He advises students to start by imagining the desired shape as if it were fully formed and then to work backwards, identifying the steps that would lead to its formation. This technique breaks down the complex task of construction into smaller, more manageable phases, each connected through an unmistakable geometric relationship.

Other Perspectives

• Relying solely on visual techniques may not be sufficient for proving geometric theorems, where formal proofs are required to establish the truth of a statement beyond visual evidence.
• While visualizing the desired shape can be helpful, it may not be practical or possible for individuals with aphantasia, who have difficulty with creating mental images.
• In some cases, focusing solely on the final objective without understanding the underlying principles can lead to rote learning, where the student may not fully grasp the reasoning behind the steps taken.
• In certain cases, a forward-thinking strategy might be more intuitive, especially for those who struggle with visual-spatial reasoning.
• In some cases, focusing on smaller phases might lead to a loss of the overall coherence of the design, as the interconnections between different parts of the geometric figure might be overlooked.

To tackle proof problems effectively, one must comprehend the foundational principles and the conclusions they lead to, while also examining relevant theorems.

Polya advises focusing on the logical structure of the theorem when dealing with issues in proofs, scrutinizing the initial assumptions as well as the conclusion, and inquiring about the nature of the initial assumptions. What conclusions can we draw from these observations? Prior to beginning the proof, it is essential to fully understand the meaning of the proposition. He also recommends applying known mathematical principles and identifying patterns by reflecting on the results. Reflect on a familiar principle that yields a similar or closely associated outcome. Investigating this aspect might result in pinpointing a suitable theorem or suggest a method for constructing a proof that is consistent with recognized patterns of logical deduction.

Other Perspectives

• Some proof problems are solved by counterexamples, which may not require an in-depth understanding of foundational principles or relevant theorems but rather a keen eye for exceptions and anomalies.
• Polya's advice might lead one to overemphasize the formal structure at the expense of exploring alternative proof strategies that could be more efficient or insightful.
• While understanding the meaning of the proposition is important, it is not always necessary to have a full grasp before starting the proof; sometimes the process of attempting the proof can lead to a deeper understanding of the proposition itself.
• Relying too heavily on established patterns can sometimes cause a bias towards confirmation, where one might ignore evidence or possibilities that do not fit within the expected framework.
• Focusing on familiar principles might not be sufficient when dealing with highly complex or abstract problems that require the development of entirely new mathematical concepts or theorems.

The book also delves into challenges comparable to puzzles that go beyond the realm of mathematics, showcasing the use of analogous problem-solving techniques.

Polya demonstrates the broad applicability of problem-solving principles by tackling a variety of puzzle-like challenges, emphasizing that the cognitive strategies used are universally prevalent. He explores a word anagram puzzle, showing that by asking questions such as "Can the problem be stated in another way?" or "Keep some of the conditions and set aside the rest," one can uncover hidden connections and make headway towards the solution. This problem-solving method is universally applicable and suitable for all tasks that require mental effort.

Dissecting the issue, analyzing particular examples, and pinpointing common patterns are also valuable tactics in addressing these challenges.

Polya illustrates that deconstructing a mathematical challenge into smaller, more controllable segments, scrutinizing distinctive or extreme cases, and recognizing patterns that frequently occur can be just as advantageous in addressing mathematical problems as they are when solving puzzles. Examining the minor components that might emerge from these combinations can provide clues regarding the architecture of the word you aim to decipher by sorting the letters of the anagram into vowels and consonants, potentially revealing patterns of syllables. This underscores the concept that heuristic methods transcend individual fields of study, embodying essential tenets of proficient problem resolution.

Other Perspectives

• In some cases, deconstructing a problem can be time-consuming and inefficient, especially if the smaller segments are not independent and require constant re-evaluation in the context of the entire problem.
• While scrutinizing distinctive or extreme cases can provide insights, it may not always be representative of the general problem or the typical cases one might encounter.
• Puzzles that are novel or one-of-a-kind may not have any established patterns to recognize, requiring solvers to rely on other problem-solving skills.
• This approach assumes a level of linguistic knowledge that not all individuals may possess, which could limit its effectiveness for some people.
• The usefulness of this strategy can vary greatly depending on the specific language and its orthographic rules.
• The complexity of certain problems may render heuristic methods insufficient, necessitating more sophisticated or domain-specific problem-solving techniques.

The book emphasizes the significance of skills in solving problems in all areas of life, not just in mathematical contexts.

Polya argues that problem-solving is not merely a mathematical skill but a fundamental human activity. The author suggests that problem-solving is similar to a practical skill like swimming, which can be enhanced and honed through regular practice and careful reflection. He illustrates the wide-ranging applicability of problem-solving methods by highlighting their usefulness in various scenarios, from chess conundrums to practical technical challenges.

An effective individual in resolving issues is characterized by their adaptable, inventive approach and their capacity to draw lessons from triumphs as well as setbacks.

Polya's teachings highlight the importance of developing a nimble and inventive approach to thinking, suggesting that the true benefit of engaging with problems often lies in the process of learning through successes and setbacks, rather than just arriving at an answer. He underscores the value of initial efforts that may not yield immediate success, highlighting that such attempts can reveal fresh insights or steer the person addressing the issue towards an improved approach. He encourages individuals who solve problems to utilize their successes by considering how the insights or methods they have acquired might be applied to a different issue. The concept underscores that solving problems is a continuous cycle of learning and improvement.

Practical Tips

• Organize a monthly "adaptability circle" with friends or colleagues where each person brings a problem they're facing and the group collaboratively discusses unconventional solutions. This not only provides you with a variety of perspectives but also helps you practice and observe adaptability and creativity in action.
• Start a "Setback Simulation" exercise with a friend or family member where you role-play a recent challenge, but with the roles reversed. Acting out the situation from the other person's perspective can provide fresh insights into how you handle problems and how you might approach them differently. This can be a fun and engaging way to gain empathy and new problem-solving strategies.
• Engage in a hobby that is outside of your comfort zone and requires a different skill set than you're used to. For example, if you're a writer, try painting; if you're a mathematician, try creative writing. This will force your brain to work in unfamiliar ways, building its nimbleness.
• Start a "Learning Log" to jot down unexpected outcomes and insights from your daily activities. Whenever you try something new and it doesn't work out as planned, write down what happened, why you think it happened, and what you learned from it. This can turn perceived failures into valuable learning experiences.
• Develop a habit of reflective practice by setting aside time each week to reflect on your successes and how they might inform your approach to different areas of your life. During this reflection, ask yourself what core principles led to your success and how these can be adapted to new situations. If you found that being proactive helped you in a fitness goal, think about how being proactive can improve your relationships or professional projects.