PDF Summary:Glossy, by Marisa Meltzer

In Glossy, Marisa Meltzer chronicles the rise and evolution of the direct-to-consumer beauty company Glossier, founded in 2014 by Emily Weiss. The book explores Glossier's unconventional approach to e-commerce, focusing on cultivating a devoted online community and immersive retail experiences that solidified its popularity among millennials and Gen Z.

The author also examines Glossier's public struggles and controversies surrounding company culture, diversity, and the broader societal "girlboss" archetype that Weiss embodied. As the company matured, it faced challenges in upholding its core principles and distancing itself from the girlboss narrative, exemplified by Weiss's transition to the executive chairwoman role.

(continued)...

Glossier's emphasis on community, visual appeal, and ease of access established Weiss as the quintessential representation of the "girlboss" archetype.

The visual aesthetic of Glossier was intrinsically associated with the "girlboss" archetype. Weiss became the epitome of the archetype, partly due to the carefully constructed image associated with her involvement in the beauty industry. The focus on nurturing a communal spirit, showcasing relatable models, and promoting customer engagement, combined with its warm and welcoming approach, collectively instills a sense of achievable empowerment that resonates with the ethos of the "girlboss." Weiss swiftly gained recognition, frequently featured in interviews and articles, and became a sought-after speaker at events celebrating female business founders.

As the "girlboss" notion gained traction, female leaders of corporations encountered heightened scrutiny and negative judgment, particularly when any possible shortcomings or flaws in their leadership approach were exposed.

The author analyzes the downfall of the "girlboss" movement, attributing it to its fundamental lack of sustainability. As the once-celebrated image lost its luster, the women previously hailed as pioneers and innovators faced intense public examination and censure, which exposed a troubling side of harmful office environments and impractical business methods.

The intense scrutiny and unrealistic standards often aimed at women in positions of power are exemplified by the well-known difficulties encountered by prominent "girlbosses," including those at Nasty Gal.

These businesses, once celebrated for their rapid growth and innovative approaches, and referred to as "girlboss" companies, ultimately experienced a decline due to allegations of inadequate leadership and creating a toxic work environment. The founder, once hailed as an embodiment of feminist principles, swiftly faced intense public scrutiny. These events shed light on the unequal and intensified examination faced by female leaders, whose mistakes or shortcomings are often magnified compared to their male counterparts in equivalent positions. Initially celebrated as exemplars for women seeking to establish their own businesses, the "girlbosses" eventually became cautionary tales, trapped by a framework that set unattainable expectations and showed no mercy to those who fell short.

The "girlboss" archetype eventually faced criticism for promoting a narrow and exclusive type of female entrepreneurship that failed to acknowledge the deep-rooted structural obstacles in the corporate sphere and the wider societal environment.

As the "girlboss" trend's popularity diminished, its shortcomings became increasingly apparent. It became clear that focusing predominantly on women entrepreneurs who were often white, slim, conventionally attractive, and wealthy offered a distorted and incomplete picture of the diversity in women's entrepreneurship. This limited portrayal neglected the experiences of women of color, those from less affluent backgrounds, or female entrepreneurs whose endeavors did not align with the consumer-focused, visually driven norms that dominate the image-centric social media platform.

Other Perspectives

• The "girlboss" movement may have been a necessary stepping stone for broader conversations about women in leadership, despite its oversimplifications.
• Some argue that the movement has helped to normalize female entrepreneurship and leadership, which historically have been male-dominated areas.
• The focus on individual success stories can be motivating and provide role models for aspiring female entrepreneurs.
• Glossier's success under Emily Weiss could be seen as a testament to effective branding and community-building, not just the "girlboss" narrative.
• The heightened scrutiny faced by female leaders could be a reflection of society's growing expectations for ethical leadership, rather than a bias against women.
• The criticism of the "girlboss" archetype for being narrow and exclusive might overlook the broader impact of the movement in inspiring a generation of women to pursue entrepreneurship.
• The "girlboss" movement's portrayal of entrepreneurship might reflect societal values and media preferences at the time, rather than an intentional exclusion of diversity.

The firm's surroundings have experienced a metamorphosis, updating and advancing its processes.

The initial environment at Glossier was marked by a vibrant sense of togetherness, an enthusiastic drive for innovation, and a dedication to diligent effort coupled with lively recreation, drawing in a workforce that was youthful and enthusiastic.

Meltzer describes the early environment at Glossier as a captivating and creative space that attracted a young, committed team united by shared goals and camaraderie.

The organization cultivated an atmosphere of camaraderie and cooperation, where employees connected through common experiences and felt they were contributing to a unique endeavor.

The firm's annual extravagant event, known as a retreat that combined themed festivities, fine dining, and diverse al fresco activities, fostered a sense of community and made the distinction between work and personal life less distinct. Employees were encouraged to express their individuality, share their interests, and adopt a lighthearted demeanor that reflected the company's ethos, fostering a closely bonded workplace where strong friendships frequently formed and a genuine dedication to both the organization and its founder, Weiss, emerged.

However, this culture also led to issues of cliquishness, favoritism, and lack of formal HR policies, which caused tensions and resentment among certain employees.

As Glossier grew, the blend of an informal approach to management and the unique leadership methods of Weiss started to create discord among the company's ranks. Meltzer explains that the lack of a clear pecking order and the focus on interpersonal relationships led to claims of favoritism, particularly aimed at a group of long-standing employees who were seen as the epitome of Glossier's ethos and values because of their close ties to Weiss. Additionally, the company's limited capacity in managing human resources and its informal method of handling employee grievances resulted in feelings of disregard and insufficient backing, especially for those staff members who were not under the direct impact of Weiss.

The company faced difficulties maintaining its core principles, particularly regarding employee treatment and the promotion of a diverse and inclusive work environment, as it grew.

The author praises Glossier's early work atmosphere while also candidly exposing its considerable shortcomings. As Glossier grew, the company's informal approach to human resources, the limited range of color options, and the predominantly white leadership team increasingly stood out as notable weaknesses. The tragic passing of George Floyd sparked widespread reevaluation of racial matters, prompting Glossier along with many other companies to publicly confront their roles in deep-rooted systemic inequalities.

The dispute linked to @outtathegloss shed light on allegations of racial prejudice and inequitable practices at Glossier's retail locations, which led the company to acknowledge its shortcomings and implement appropriate changes.

Former staff members of Glossier brought attention to the challenges the brand encountered with racism and discrimination impacting their customer-facing employees through the establishment of the social media profile @outtathegloss. Questions arose about the sincerity of their dedication to fostering an environment that embraces inclusivity, following claims of microaggressions, disparate treatment, and insufficient managerial action. Glossier committed to creating an environment that is inclusive and welcoming to everyone internally.

Weiss's transition to the position of executive chairwoman was seen by some as a deliberate strategy to polish the company's corporate reputation and distance it from past cultural missteps.

In 2022, the departure of Weiss from the leading executive role, while presented as a deliberate shift in command, was viewed by many as an attempt to distance herself from the company's difficulties and address the growing perception of her misalignment with the evolving expectations of the workforce and clientele. Kyle Leahy's ascent to the CEO role, with his experience at the helm of consumer brands like Cole Haan, signaled a shift to a more systematic and data-driven approach to leadership, diverging from the distinctive and individualized style of management that was characteristic of Weiss's tenure.

Other Perspectives

• The firm's transformation may have been necessary to stay competitive and relevant in a rapidly evolving industry, rather than merely a response to internal issues.
• A vibrant initial environment is common in startups and can sometimes mask underlying structural weaknesses that need to be addressed as a company matures.
• Cultivating camaraderie and cooperation is important, but without proper boundaries, it can lead to an unprofessional environment.
• Annual extravagant events can be seen as a positive company culture practice, but they may also be perceived as frivolous spending, especially if the company faces financial challenges or layoffs.
• Encouraging employees to express individuality is valuable, but without a strong company culture and values, this can lead to a lack of cohesion and direction.
• Issues of cliquishness and favoritism can arise in any organization and may not be unique to Glossier or indicative of systemic problems within the company.
• Maintaining core principles is a challenge for any growing company, and struggles with diversity and inclusion are industry-wide issues, not exclusive to Glossier.
• The informal approach to human resources could have been a deliberate strategy to maintain a startup culture and agility, which some might argue is beneficial in certain stages of a company's growth.
• The response to systemic inequalities following George Floyd's death, while perhaps delayed, could be seen as a sincere effort to make meaningful changes rather than just a public relations move.
• The allegations brought forward by @outtathegloss may not reflect the experiences of all employees, and the company's commitment to change could be genuine rather than merely performative.
• Weiss's transition to executive chairwoman could be part of a natural evolution of leadership roles as the company scales, rather than a tactic to distance herself from past issues.

The broader cultural and economic factors that shaped the evolution of Glossier and the lasting influence of the "girlboss" notion.

The emergence of Glossier and the "girlboss" trend coincided with significant changes in society and business practices, characterized by an increase in brands that market their products directly to consumers, the growing influence of social media platforms, and a consumer inclination towards marketing that feels genuine and approachable.

Meltzer sheds light on how the ascent of Glossier is intertwined with broader cultural shifts that took place throughout the ten years beginning in 2010. The company surfaced during a pivotal period, aligning with the rapid transformation of the consumer landscape via social media, drawing in a fresh demographic of customers seeking goods and experiences that aligned with their individual principles.

Brands emphasizing the creation of online communities and the promotion of engagement resonated with a younger audience, which laid the foundation for innovative companies like Glossier to revolutionize the conventional beauty industry.

Glossier adeptly utilized Instagram's influence to cultivate a devoted online community, adeptly steering through the changing landscape of the digital era with success. They understood the power of influencer marketing, creating an aspirational yet accessible aesthetic that resonated with millennials seeking authenticity and connection. This innovative approach allowed them to surpass traditional marketing methods by directly engaging with their customers and quickly adapting to their desires.

However, as the fascination with the concept of a female business leader waned and consumer tastes evolved, Glossier faced increased competition from emerging brands that aligned more closely with the growing demand for eco-friendly practices and the embrace of diverse beauty standards.

As the ten-year period drew to a close, the consumer environment began to shift once more. The allure of companies labeled "girlboss," such as Glossier, started to diminish when concerns about inclusivity, workplace practices, and environmental responsibility became more prominent. Companies emphasizing a clear purpose started to attract customers eager to find products that aligned with their own values. Glossier, along with similar companies that established their identities on the premise of welcoming all, faced a significant hurdle that required them to evolve and adapt in order to stay pertinent.

Several high-profile "girlbosses" facing challenges and the subsequent scrutiny of this archetype highlighted the need for a more nuanced and equitable representation of female entrepreneurship and leadership.

Meltzer acknowledges that to fully understand the story of Glossier and its founder, one must also consider the waning influence of the female entrepreneurial archetype. This backlash marked a pivotal shift in societal values, highlighting a system that prioritized individual charm and ambition while neglecting to address deep-rooted inequalities and to create lasting approaches to commerce.

The dialogue surrounding the "girlboss" notion uncovered deep-seated obstacles linked to social privileges, varying standards, and the lack of substantial change that often accompanied the successes of these young, energetic female business founders.

These "girlboss gotcha" narratives, often shared with evident glee, revealed unsettling realities hidden behind the carefully constructed veneers of female empowerment and unity. Often, these organizations replicated the very frameworks they claimed to oppose, employing underpaid labor and promoting a narrow and exclusive view of female success.

Emily Weiss's transition from CEO to the position of executive chairwoman at Glossier was seen as an opportunity for the company to progress beyond the "girlboss" stereotype and establish a more sustainable and formally organized leadership model.

Emily Weiss's shift from the role of CEO to that of chairwoman signaled an understanding that it was time for Glossier to pursue a different path. She departed intentionally to reposition the company's image, moving away from the "girlboss" narrative and instead emphasizing a leadership style that prioritizes data and systematic strategies. This metamorphosis could position Glossier to focus on its core strengths like innovation, customer engagement, and brand development, while addressing the internal and cultural challenges that have impeded its growth, solidifying its status as an influential player in the ever-evolving cosmetics sector.

Other Perspectives

• The success of Glossier and similar brands may not be solely due to the "girlboss" trend or social media influence, but also due to product quality, customer service, and other business fundamentals.
• The decline of the "girlboss" trend might not be just because of a shift in consumer values, but also due to market saturation and the natural lifecycle of business trends.
• The criticism of the "girlboss" archetype could be seen as a broader critique of entrepreneurial culture rather than a gender-specific issue, suggesting that the problems identified are not unique to female-led businesses.
• The transition of Emily Weiss from CEO to executive chairwoman may not necessarily indicate a move away from the "girlboss" stereotype, but could be a strategic business decision unrelated to cultural trends.
• The focus on eco-friendly practices and diverse beauty standards as a competitive edge against Glossier might overlook other factors such as pricing, accessibility, and technological innovation that could also play significant roles in the market dynamics.
• The notion that the "girlboss" archetype inherently involves social privilege and narrow views of success could be challenged by examples of female entrepreneurs who have actively worked to address social inequalities and broaden the definition of success within their businesses.
• The idea that the "girlboss" concept is waning in influence might be contradicted by ongoing successful ventures led by women, suggesting that the archetype still has relevance and resonance in certain markets or contexts.