PDF Summary:Extraordinary Circumstances, by Cynthia Cooper

In the aftermath of WorldCom's historic collapse, auditor Cynthia Cooper offers an inside look at her role in uncovering the company's fraudulent accounting practices in Extraordinary Circumstances.

Cooper reveals how unchecked expansion under CEO Bernie Ebbers and pressure from personal financial dealings led executives down a path of manipulating finances and hiding billions in losses. She sheds light on the corporate cultures and organizational dynamics that enabled unethical choices and showcases the challenges whistleblowers face. Cooper underscores the vital role of individual integrity in upholding ethical standards even under immense pressure.

(continued)...

• The resistance from executives like Scott Sullivan to internal audits could be seen as a defense of their departments' autonomy and decision-making, although this stance ultimately proved detrimental to the company's health.
• Bernie Ebbers' personal financial ventures and the need for capital might have driven the company to achieve financial goals, but this personal entanglement with corporate finances could be criticized as a conflict of interest that may have clouded his judgment.
• The use of "prepaid capacity" to inflate earnings, while fraudulent, might have been rationalized by executives under immense pressure to meet market expectations, though this does not justify the deception.
• Sullivan and Myers' admission to the lack of verification in accounting paperwork could be seen as an acknowledgment of flawed practices, but it also raises questions about the pressures and incentives that led to such lapses in judgment.
• The Audit Committee's confirmation of fraudulent activities and the subsequent actions taken against Sullivan and Ebbers show a response to the crisis, but also suggest that earlier intervention and stronger oversight mechanisms might have prevented the extent of the fraud.
• WorldCom's declaration of insolvency was a significant event, but it also opened the door for industry reforms and highlighted the need for better regulatory oversight and corporate governance practices.

The Influence of Whistleblowers

Cynthia Cooper was responsible for the investigation and disclosure.

Cynthia Cooper made attempts to alert the appropriate parties about the financial irregularities; however, Scott Sullivan was resolute in his efforts to hide her findings.

Cooper and her team regularly encountered challenges due to the absence of robust internal governance mechanisms within WorldCom, which operated in a setting characterized by volatility and insufficient regulation. Scott Sullivan, the Chief Financial Officer, often resisted recommendations to improve processes and strengthen systems, which line executives, focused on growth, potential mergers, or stock prices, commonly rejected or ignored.

The group faced significant hurdles when attempting to balance the company's emphasis on reducing expenses to maximize profits against the need to rectify core issues within its customer support, invoicing, and financial record-keeping procedures. In early 2002, Cooper launched a comprehensive investigation into the WorldCom division that managed the distribution of wireless services in the secondary market. Her team discovered glaring discrepancies between the reported profits and the actual fiscal results, as well as evidence of widespread fraudulent subscription activities stemming from the division's lack of adequate oversight.

When Cooper relayed the specifics to Sullivan, he unexpectedly asked her to downplay or leave out information about the unit's allocation in her team's report. She alerted Max Bobbitt, the Audit Committee's chairperson, and Bernie Ebbers, the Chief Executive Officer, about Sullivan's attempts to hide this information. In a daring and perilous decision, she opted to ignore her superiors' instructions and sent the unaltered report, containing vital information, directly to the team in charge of the company's auditing oversight.

Cynthia Cooper decided to report the prepaid capacity entries directly to the Audit Committee, fully aware of the potential consequences, instead of channeling the information via Scott Sullivan.

Continuing to investigate the suspicious "prepaid capacity" entries, Cooper and her team grew increasingly alarmed by the financial implications. The figures under scrutiny were immense, totaling billions of dollars. The complex financial transactions, coupled with the accounting team's unwillingness to cooperate, suggested a deliberate effort to conceal unethical behavior.

In the company's unregulated environment reminiscent of frontier lawlessness, Cooper understood that if she reported her concerns directly to the Audit Committee instead of going through her superior, Scott Sullivan, it could significantly threaten her career. Cooper, a female manager at the helm of a nascent team in a male-dominated corporation, and under a CEO who was notorious for his dislike of conflict and impulsive choices, was acutely aware of the potential consequences.

She was once regarded as an "outsider" after she expressed disagreement with a high-ranking female executive's decision to hire a particular consulting company. Cynthia Cooper decided to bypass Sullivan and directly consulted Max Bobbitt, who, upon realizing the significant financial implications of the team's findings, recommended delaying any additional actions until he had an opportunity to discuss the matters with Sullivan himself.

Cynthia Cooper, though initially yielding to his requests, eventually chose to circumvent Bobbitt and contacted WorldCom's accounting team, driven by the imperative need to notify the Audit Committee. This pivotal action marked the intensification of discord and would eventually unveil a deception of unparalleled magnitude.

The probe that revealed the $11 billion financial deception was jointly conducted with the SEC and the DOJ.

The revelation of WorldCom's misleading accounting methods triggered a series of investigations, legal actions from shareholders, and thorough scrutiny by the media. Cynthia Cooper played a crucial role in delivering testimony for the prosecution, faced considerable and at times overwhelming pressure to precisely convey her team's findings, justify her actions, and navigate the complex and often politically charged investigations that followed. In this intricate and tumultuous setting, Cooper collaborated intimately with her legal advisors to execute her responsibilities and persistently aided authorities in revealing the actual facts.

Initially, it was unclear how much influence there was. The investigation's leadership became a point of contention, with both the Southern District of New York and the Southern District of Mississippi from the Justice Department vying for the role. Cynthia Cooper encountered increased uncertainty while dealing with conflicting instructions and expectations from various government entities, which intensified disagreements among the agencies.

Cooper's team, working alongside legal consultants and forensic specialists, devoted a significant amount of time to carefully documenting their findings, substantiating them with supporting evidence, and amending any misleading records. Cynthia Cooper and her colleague Glyn Smith made numerous trips to Washington and New York, where they were deeply involved in discussions and provided detailed information during numerous meetings with prosecutors, FBI agents, and SEC officials, as well as spending many hours readying themselves for testimonies. The authorities' probe eventually uncovered a deceitful financial manipulation that totaled to eleven billion dollars, establishing an unprecedented case in the annals of corporate wrongdoing.

Personal and Professional Impact

Media attention and breaches of privacy led to harassment and even threats to her personal security.

Cynthia Cooper became the focus of worldwide scrutiny because of her association with the WorldCom debacle and was overwhelmed by persistent media inquiries that aimed to explore the details of her role. Cynthia Cooper worked closely with law enforcement but sought to keep her personal life private, choosing to refrain from participating in interviews and allowing her legal advisor to coordinate with WorldCom's public relations personnel for all media communications.

Despite her best efforts to avoid publicity, Cooper found her private life exposed when teams of reporters stationed themselves outside her residence and at her parents' house, diligently searching the area for information. Her phone was constantly ringing with requests from news organizations like the Today Show and Nightline, who were eager to schedule interviews. Tabloid journalists contacted her previous classmates and instructors to obtain personal details and photographs.

Cooper took numerous precautions to protect herself and her family in response to the unyielding pressure and threats she faced. Worried about her safety, she started to neglect her phone, reduced her engagements with others, and, alongside her partner, kept a watchful eye on her surroundings. Cynthia Cooper started parking her car in a more secluded part of the WorldCom lot and consistently sought the company of security personnel when walking to her car due to concerns about potential harassment.

The collapse of WorldCom led to significant emotional distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms.

Cynthia Cooper's emotional and physical well-being, as well as her career trajectory, were significantly impacted by the downfall of WorldCom and the immense scrutiny from the investigations, in addition to her professional responsibilities. After uncovering the deceit, Cooper wrestled with a whirlwind of feelings such as fear, anger, sadness, and a profound feeling of having been treacherously let down. She endured bouts of sleeplessness, nausea, and fatigue, and found it difficult at times to leave her bed and face the chaotic world outside.

Cynthia Cooper shouldered the responsibility of exposing actions that led to the collapse of a prominent corporation, not only a member of the Fortune 500 but also a pillar of her state's economic foundation, thereby magnifying the stress she experienced. Cynthia Cooper encountered continuous indicators of the firm's decline, including intense media attention related to the investigations, increasing shareholder litigation, and the noticeable void created by many laid-off colleagues in previously lively workspaces, along with the mounting worry that individuals she held in high esteem could get caught up in the judicial complications as the inquiry progressed.

Cynthia Cooper grappled with the immense task of reconciling her ethical principles with her role in revealing misconduct, conscious of the fact that her actions, despite being unintentional, inflicted considerable anguish and damage on individuals who had no knowledge of the situation. Her dedication to principled behavior clashed with the turmoil that erupted around her. She sought solace and guidance amid the difficulties with the help of her partner, relatives, close friends, and religious counselor, always bearing in mind the lesson imparted by her dad that adversity is a fundamental part of life.

In the male-dominated field, Cynthia Cooper faced professional hurdles and resistance from some at WorldCom.

In her rise through the professional ranks, Cooper encountered gender-related obstacles within settings largely dominated by men. In this challenging and competitive atmosphere, the distinction between proper professional behavior and improper personal conduct was often blurred. Upon joining WorldCom, Cynthia Cooper, who was already skilled in navigating the complexities of public accounting while juggling family responsibilities and corporate life, faced unique obstacles.

The company's culture, influenced by CEO Bernie Ebbers who prized loyalty and fostered an often intimidating and unpredictable office environment, quickly presented distinct challenges for women in leadership positions. Cooper faced not only overt sexism but also a more covert, undermining type of bias that diminished the perceived abilities, decision-making, and input of her female peers. This subtle bias manifested in various forms, from assumptions about her capabilities tied to her age and gender to casual remarks, such as when a male supervisor implied she should "know her place," to more overt actions, like being passed over for promotion after a disagreement with a senior female executive in the firm.

After the fraudulent activities came to light, the company began a restructuring process and brought in new leadership, which resulted in a shift in how some individuals within WorldCom perceived Cynthia Cooper and her colleagues. The team she led faced significant cuts in funding and a reduction in staff, with promotions being put on hold. Additionally, she discovered through indirect means that some members of the executive team were deliberately attempting to damage her reputation, and her access to the financial records system was severely limited.

Legacy and Impact on Whistleblowing

Cynthia Cooper received recognition from Time magazine as the individual of the year for her commitment to ethical decision-making and her encouragement of individuals who expose wrongdoing.

After the WorldCom scandal was revealed, Cooper, who had previously kept a low profile and avoided the limelight, agreed to join a group interview with Time Magazine, alongside Sherron Watkins of Enron and Coleen Rowley from the FBI, both of whom were also prominent whistleblowers.

The journey that led to Cynthia Cooper's transformation and healing was unexpected. Encountering Watkins and Rowley, sharing stories and mutual frustrations, became a pivotal moment in her recovery, allowing her to overcome feelings of solitude and despondency. Ultimately, the trio opted to continue with further conversations. Time In 2002, the team collectively received the honor of being named Person of the Year.

Compelled by a profound obligation, Cooper was impelled to share her experiences, acknowledging that her decision to come forward played a part in a wider movement. She knew that upholding moral principles might require difficult decisions, which could result in substantial personal and career sacrifices, and understood that revealing misconduct, either internally or externally, could have serious and occasionally unexpected consequences for the whistleblower. Since the scandal unfolded, Cooper emerged as a prominent proponent of ethical decision-making and has actively supported enhanced safeguards for individuals who report wrongdoing. Cynthia Cooper actively promotes personal accountability and transparency by engaging in public speaking, delivering presentations, and participating in dialogues, consistently encouraging both individuals and organizations to question the systems and conditions that permit dishonest and unethical behavior.

The importance of individual morality, courage, and the search for support within the realm of whistleblower investigations.

Cynthia Cooper's journey at WorldCom deeply influenced her fascination with the concept of whistleblowing, and this interest was shared by journalists, legal experts, and scholars. She endeavored to comprehend the motivations behind the misuse of power by those in charge, the reasons why employees participate in deceitful activities, the factors leading to retaliation within organizations, and the ways in which the legal system could be enhanced to offer stronger safeguards for individuals who bravely challenge misconduct.

Cooper examined numerous reports and research papers detailing the experiences of individuals who exposed wrongdoing, a concept often linked with an unfairly negative connotation. Cynthia Cooper's narrative enlightens us about the severe consequences that whistleblowers often endure, despite legal protections, which can include financial hardships, unemployment, threats, ostracism, mental health challenges, addiction problems, and the possible disintegration of familial ties. Challenging an organization's actions from within can lead to an emotional toll that might be burdensome, culminating in a profound feeling of being underappreciated and experiencing a sense of treachery on a personal level for the individual who exposes wrongdoing.

Cooper, however, also uncovered approaches that could assist whistleblowers and their relatives in mitigating the negative impacts and navigating the complexities of this demanding path more skillfully. She emphasizes the significance of nurturing a robust personal identity, adhering to fundamental principles despite external influences to act contrary, cultivating enduring personal connections, and pursuing legal and psychological assistance when necessary.

Cynthia Cooper seeks to foster transformation and impart insights in corporate America through the lessons she learned from her participation in the WorldCom debacle.

Since the WorldCom scandal came to light, Cooper has committed a substantial part of her professional life to sharing the insights she acquired while enduring that challenging and strenuous experience. She has imparted her knowledge through speeches and lectures to a varied group comprising students and professionals, focusing on identifying deceitful practices, the role of individuals who report misconduct, ethical conduct, and the core values of organizational culture.

Cynthia Cooper emphasizes the importance of carefully examining the ethical dilemmas encountered in one's private life as well as in their career, considering their values and commitment to integrity. She underscores the importance of remaining vigilant to avoid becoming numb to misconduct, rationalizing bad choices, or yielding to coercion and strong-arm tactics employed by individuals with power.

Cooper highlights ten key principles to help guide decision making and foster more ethical behavior:

1. Determine and define the ethical standards you intend to uphold and specify the measures you intend to implement should these standards be challenged.
2. Interact with others as you would have them interact with you.
3. Remain alert to the possibility that all individuals have an innate capacity to make unethical choices and take care to avoid rationalizing subpar decisions.
4. Consider how the public at large might respond: Would you be comfortable if the decision you took was featured prominently on the front page of a major financial newspaper like the Wall Street Journal?
5. Cultivate ethical conduct consistently: Character is shaped through the accumulation of daily decisions.
6. Engage in conversations with others about challenging ethical issues. Seek outside perspectives to avoid rationalizing inappropriate behavior.
7. Discover your bravery: Learn how to act despite fear.
8. Maintain a consistent ethical code across all situations to prevent any form of duplicity.
9. Heed your intuition: Trust your instincts when they signal that something may indeed be amiss.
10. Uphold your values firmly rather than yielding to those in positions of authority, particularly when they are pressuring you to engage in conduct that compromises moral principles.

Other Perspectives

• While Cooper's direct reporting to the Audit Committee was crucial, it could be argued that earlier or more aggressive attempts to address the issues internally might have mitigated some of the damage.
• The recognition by Time magazine, while significant, does not necessarily equate to effective change in corporate governance or whistleblower protections; it's a symbolic gesture rather than a practical one.
• Cooper's advocacy for ethical decision-making is important, but it may not be enough to change entrenched corporate cultures without systemic reforms and stronger regulatory frameworks.
• The focus on Cooper's personal struggles, though sympathetic, might overshadow the broader systemic issues that allow such financial deceptions to occur in the first place.
• Cooper's insights and principles for ethical behavior are valuable, but they may not be universally applicable or sufficient in all corporate or organizational contexts.
• The narrative of Cooper as a hero could potentially simplify the complex dynamics of whistleblowing, which often involves many individuals and factors.
• The emphasis on individual morality and courage in whistleblowing might inadvertently underplay the role of collective action and structural support in combating corporate malfeasance.

Lessons Learned from the WorldCom Experience

Under the leadership of CEO Bernie Ebbers

The charismatic and aggressive personality not only fueled expansion but also fostered an atmosphere where fear was compounded by coercion.

The multifaceted individual who elevated a modest firm to a significant force in the worldwide telecommunications sector had a story shrouded in mystery and shaped by hardship. Cooper depicts him as an individual capable of inspiring and invoking fear, frequently employing self-deprecating humor, though sometimes he displays irritability and projects a commanding presence. The financial community eventually regarded Ebbers' once-admired bold and adventurous strategies as reckless.

His supporters praised his unwavering commitment, his generosity, and his focus on increasing shareholder value, as well as his contribution to elevating numerous ordinary workers to the ranks of millionaires, an achievement that continues to earn him positive recognition. After the scandal came to light, detractors of Ebbers highlighted his authoritative approach to management, his dislike for conflict, his tendency for erratic actions, and his excessive emphasis on corporate takeovers and reducing expenses, which undermined the establishment of cohesive systems and proper oversight, as principal contributors to an atmosphere that facilitated and sustained fraudulent activities.

The firm's mismanagement of funds was partly attributed to its reliance on less seasoned staff members, leading to a disconnect from the complex workings of the business.

Bernie Ebbers, despite his position at the helm of a complex and expansive technology firm, did not possess in-depth knowledge in finance, technology, or accounting, as Cooper has documented. Ebbers acknowledged his limited knowledge in technical matters and placed significant trust in his team, including CFO Scott Sullivan, to oversee those aspects of the company. Initially, Ebbers focused on growing the company through the purchase of other enterprises; yet, as WorldCom rapidly expanded and its operations grew more complex, this approach turned into an obstacle.

Ebbers favored steering the company through overarching strategies and a reliance on his gut feelings, steering clear of the complexities of detailed financial or operational data and intricate numerical reports. Former executives who collaborated with Ebbers reported that his meticulousness often turned into an excessive concern with minor issues, such as an intense focus on the expenses of office supplies or an obsession with the price of a single roofing tile for his extravagant home being built, while he neglected to review or approve complex financial strategies intended to improve the company's infrastructure and technological base.

The need to maintain the stock price of WorldCom, along with personal financial obligations and the pressure from margin calls, influenced the choice to participate in unethical actions.

Cynthia Cooper was instrumental in revealing that the collapse of the company was significantly influenced by Ebbers' personal financial investments. As CEO, he was a staunch proponent of holding onto stock investments for the long term. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, he regularly rejected offers to buy LDDS, highlighting his dedication, along with the investors', to the enduring prosperity of the company. By 1999, Ebbers' fervent commitment to owning WorldCom stock, combined with the company's historic stock run up, resulted in a net worth of $1.4 billion.

However, Ebbers opted to secure his substantial personal investments pursued between 1998 and 2001 with his own assets, leading to an accumulation of debt that surpassed seven hundred million dollars. During the internet and telecommunications industries' downturn, Ebbers experienced increasing financial pressure because his investments lost value and creditors insisted on the return of borrowed funds. Some board members recommended that Ebbers should liquidate personal assets or collateralize them instead of depending on the value of his WorldCom stock to diminish his dependency on the firm's prosperity, but he ignored their advice. He subsequently revealed his intention to create a philanthropic organization funded by the revenue from selling his holdings.

Ultimately, the company's governing body, concerned about the potential public disclosure of his financial troubles and its subsequent effect on the company's stock market valuation, sanctioned a sequence of loans and assurances to Ebbers, which deepened the firm's involvement in his financial difficulties. The case brought against Ebbers by the prosecution implied that his own financial difficulties, coupled with an unyielding ambition for achievement, prompted decisions that prioritized his interests at the expense of the corporation's stakeholders, workforce, and financial contributors.

Organizational cultures and power dynamics significantly shape the environment.

Pursuing expansion and the quest for fresh opportunities without sufficient investment in solid internal structures, integration, and sustainable business strategies.

Cooper argues that WorldCom's approach, marked by a vigorous sequence of consolidations and takeovers propelled by the telecommunications growth following the division of AT&T, along with deregulation, readily available funding, and a strong stock market in the 1990s, led to a mix of positive and negative outcomes. The firm's swift rise to prominence within the industry, primarily fueled by aggressive growth via mergers and acquisitions, was compromised by fundamental internal weaknesses that went unnoticed due to a focus on expansion, which significantly contributed to its ultimate downfall.

Cynthia Cooper's team, responsible for performing internal examinations, often encountered inconsistencies in operations, a lack of standardized processes, and inadequate systems for internal control within the recently merged conglomerates. The leadership at WorldCom, while fixated on seeking new acquisitions, keeping an eye on share prices, or achieving short-term financial goals, failed to pay attention to the integration process even though they had often suggested solutions for these problems over time.

As the company grew rapidly through mergers and acquisitions, Cooper details the intensifying difficulties in supervising and controlling the numerous complex elements and the substantial volumes of transactional information, which were frequently recorded incorrectly and failed to correspond among various systems of finance and accounting.

The internal audit's integrity was undermined, resulting in fraudulent activities stemming from insufficient transparency and dialogue.

A culture that discourages dissent, Cooper explains, can stifle transparency and honest dialogue, leading to a lack of straightforward communication within the workforce. The hierarchical structure at WorldCom, along with CEO Bernie Ebbers' unpredictable leadership style and his aversion to confrontation and dissenting opinions, erected obstacles that hindered the internal audit team and other staff members from communicating negative information or challenging the decisions of those in authority.

Cooper's ascent to Vice President of Internal Audit typically involved receiving updates on significant matters from her team or colleagues instead of from the company's principal financial executive. The lack of open and clear communication among executives and throughout the various departments created a culture in which knowledge was isolated, breeding doubt and hidden agendas. This situation allowed those in power to easily control the dissemination of information and suppress opposing views, while also making it more challenging for workers within these silos to grasp the true financial health of the organization.

Cynthia Cooper describes the obstacles her group encountered while performing autonomous evaluations of risk and control, hindered by opaque practices. The team's findings were sometimes purposefully misrepresented in reports to Bernie Ebbers, and there were instances when her recommendations were completely ignored. The inquiry squad eventually uncovered the concealed deceptive practices by pinpointing the documents labeled with the term indicating advance payment for services, within a setting overwhelmed by mistrust and uncertainty.

The pursuit to meet the expectations of financial markets encouraged unethical behavior and prioritized short-term gains over long-term stability.

During the telecommunications boom of the 1990s and early 2000s, fueled by enthusiasm for the Internet and the anticipated perpetual growth of the digital economy, WorldCom's stock values reached unparalleled levels. The author outlines the transformation of the company from a regional provider of long-distance services to a global competitor, highlighting the intensifying need to maintain growth and satisfy the continuous and increasing expectations for profits and expansion from investors.

The story told by Cooper highlights how the emphasis on financial goals resulted in the use of aggressive and ultimately fraudulent accounting practices to hide violations of regulations, operational deficiencies, and the looming collapse of the industry. The decision to acquire unprofitable businesses, delay the integration of their operations, tolerate unethical and exploitative activities in certain branches rather than closing them, and manipulate financial records showed a preference for immediate financial gain over enduring ethical business practices.

Other Perspectives

• While Ebbers' leadership style may have been aggressive, it could be argued that his approach was not uncommon in the high-stakes world of corporate expansion during the telecom boom, and that many successful companies have been led by strong personalities.
• The reliance on less seasoned staff members could be seen as a strategy to inject new ideas and energy into the company, rather than a direct cause of mismanagement.
• It could be argued that Ebbers' personal financial obligations did not directly influence the unethical actions at WorldCom, and that the collapse was due to broader systemic issues within the company and industry.
• Rapid expansion and acquisition strategies are common in growing industries, and while they carry risks, they can also lead to significant innovation and market dominance when managed effectively.
• The integrity of the internal audit could have been compromised due to a variety of factors, including complex corporate structures and the difficulty of detecting sophisticated fraudulent activities, rather than solely internal cultural issues.
• The pressure to meet financial market expectations is a reality for all publicly traded companies, and while it may encourage aggressive accounting, it does not necessarily lead to unethical behavior; many companies navigate these pressures while maintaining ethical standards.