PDF Summary:Edible Economics, by Ha-Joon Chang

The conventional wisdom that economic prosperity results from minimizing government involvement and unfettered markets is widely accepted. In Edible Economics, Ha-Joon Chang offers a contrasting perspective, contending that state intervention, both historically and today, shapes economic growth trajectories in profound ways.

Chang argues that factors like culture, societal norms, and governmental policies significantly influence economic outcomes. His analysis spans topics such as colonialism's impact on global food systems, the role of government support in fostering domestic industries, and how social welfare programs can promote economic dynamism. By examining historical examples and current economic frameworks, Chang sheds light on the complex interplay of forces that determine a nation's economic path.

(continued)...

• The rules established by international trade bodies are often the result of complex negotiations that include a variety of interests, including those of civil society organizations, labor unions, and environmental groups, not just the interests of wealthy nations.
• International trade regulations are designed to reflect the comparative advantages of different countries, and wealthier countries may have a comparative advantage in agriculture, which could justify the flexibility in protecting and subsidizing this sector.
• Some developing countries have successfully leveraged global trade to accelerate their economic development by attracting multinational corporations, which can transfer knowledge, technology, and skills to the local workforce.

Challenging the dominant stories, convictions, and frameworks within the field of economics.

This section of the text challenges widely held economic assumptions and models, advocating for an expanded viewpoint that encompasses a variety of economic philosophies beyond the dominant neoclassical approach. Chang argues that for the creation of economic policies that are more equitable and effective, it is essential to consider historical backgrounds and to incorporate a broader spectrum of economic theories.

Historical evidence and the actual experiences of countries often challenge the foundational beliefs and theories of conventional economics, especially the confidence in free markets and the idea that economies will progress past an emphasis on manufacturing goods.

Chang challenges the commonly held narratives of economic success in countries like the United States and the United Kingdom, asserting that their prosperity was not achieved through the adoption of entirely unregulated markets, an assertion often put forth by proponents of neoliberal market policies. He argues that in the early stages of their economic development, these countries implemented a range of protective strategies to nurture and fortify their emerging sectors, including import limitations and financial support.

The author challenges the idea that developed economies are destined to transition away from manufacturing towards services as the bedrock of their wealth, a process commonly described as moving towards a post-industrial society. The author examines the prevalent perspective through an evaluation of Switzerland's economic system, often cited as a leading example of an economy centered on services. Switzerland, recognized for its strong banking and tourism industries, emphasizes the creation of superior industrial products like machinery and chemicals, thereby establishing its prominence at the forefront of industrial progress. Chang argues that a strong industrial foundation is crucial for fostering creativity, technological advancement, and an improved standard of living, even as automation and worldwide connectivity continue to expand.

The imperative to reevaluate entrenched economic doctrines is highlighted by the common misconceptions surrounding the journey of Britain and the US towards economic supremacy through free trade, as well as the erroneous beliefs about the Swiss economy, which is frequently but incorrectly assumed to be predominantly service-oriented.

Chang challenges the mistaken belief that the economic dominance of Britain and the US was achieved through a steadfast commitment to free-market policies. To protect their nascent industries, Britain and the United States imposed significant tariffs, later advocating for free trade after securing a dominant position in the industrial landscape.

The writer challenges the widespread belief that the primary forces driving Switzerland's economy are its tourism and financial sectors. Switzerland, defying popular belief, is distinguished by its world-leading production in the manufacturing sector on a per capita basis. This example highlights the need to critically examine seemingly self-evident economic narratives and engage with a deeper understanding of how countries achieve and maintain prosperity.

Other Perspectives

• The success of Britain and the US could be attributed to the timing and sequence of liberalization, suggesting that the strategic use of protectionism followed by free trade at the right moments was key, rather than protectionism alone.
• The focus on manufacturing prowess could overshadow the importance of innovation, quality, and niche specialization, which are key characteristics of the Swiss economy across both service and manufacturing sectors.
• The call to reevaluate economic doctrines assumes that current economic challenges are due to flaws in these doctrines, which may not necessarily be the case; other factors such as technological change, geopolitical shifts, and natural events can also play significant roles.
• The emphasis on understanding how countries historically achieved prosperity could potentially lead to a bias towards replicating past methods, which may not be effective in the current economic climate or for different countries with unique contexts.

The dominance of Neoclassical economics has narrowed the scope of economic debate, limiting the acknowledgment of various economic theories that might offer deeper and more comprehensive understanding of economic events.

Chang argues that the dominant emphasis on traditional economic theories in academic and policy-making circles often leads to a distorted and often incorrect understanding of real-world economic behavior, as it is based on narrow assumptions about human rationality and market efficiency. He argues that the focus on individual self-interest, a principle championed by neoclassical economics, has normalized the quest for personal profit, often at the expense of other important values like collaboration and altruism.

The author advocates for broadening our view of economics to include insights from a variety of economic theories, including those from Keynesian, Marxist, Institutional, and Behavioral schools. Each of these schools contributes distinct viewpoints and methodologies that enhance economic analysis, fostering a deeper comprehension of matters such as disparities in wealth, the progression of economies, and governmental functions. Chang promotes the combination of diverse economic theories to develop strategies that improve equity and are better suited to manage the complexities of the modern international economic landscape.

Exploring economic issues with a comprehensive approach that includes multiple theoretical viewpoints can deepen our understanding of intricate economic matters, including the uneven distribution of wealth and the roles of governmental bodies.

Chang calls for a more balanced and nuanced approach to economics that recognizes the limitations of relying solely on neoclassical analysis. He argues that by integrating insights from various economic schools of thought, such as Keynesianism, which emphasizes the essential part government plays in sustaining economic balance, and institutionalism, which recognizes the impact of social and cultural factors, we can gain a deeper understanding of the economic challenges that confront us today.

The author highlights how a narrow focus on neoclassical assumptions can obscure important aspects of reality. For example, the emphasis of neoclassical theory on individual rationality and market efficiency often fails to consider the influence of power dynamics, historical injustices, and systemic constraints on the economic results for individuals and countries. Incorporating a wider range of viewpoints enables economists to develop analyses that better comprehend the complexities of the real world, which in turn facilitates the formulation of more enlightened and potentially more effective policies.

Practical Tips

• Host a monthly discussion group with friends or community members to explore and debate various economic theories and current events. This encourages the exchange of diverse perspectives and helps you understand the practical implications of different economic schools of thought. You might pick a current economic issue, such as inflation, and discuss how different economic theories would address it, thereby enriching your understanding through collective insight.
• Keep a personal journal where you track decisions that you make which are not based on maximizing utility or profit, such as volunteering or helping a neighbor. Reflect on how these choices provide value to your life and community, offering a perspective on human behavior that extends beyond the scope of traditional economic analysis.
• Create a personal economic stimulus plan by setting aside a "rainy day" fund that you can inject into your local economy during slower periods. Spend it on local businesses and services to simulate the Keynesian approach of stimulating demand, and monitor how this spending affects your community and your personal financial situation over time.
• Start a conversation with friends or colleagues about how their cultural backgrounds influence their financial decisions. This can be as simple as discussing spending habits during holidays or cultural events. You might discover that some people save more due to cultural reasons, while others might feel pressured to spend during certain occasions, highlighting the cultural impact on personal economies.
• Engage in "role-reversal debates" with friends or family where you argue from a position that is not your own, focusing on historical injustices and power imbalances. This could involve taking the stance of a marginalized group during a discussion about policy or social issues to better understand and articulate the complexities beyond neoclassical assumptions.
• Engage with interactive economic simulations available online that allow you to make decisions based on different economic models and scenarios. These simulations can help you appreciate the complexity of economic systems and the impact of integrating various viewpoints into decision-making processes.
• Volunteer for a local non-profit organization that works with economic issues to gain firsthand experience. This will give you a practical understanding of wealth distribution and the impact of government policies at the grassroots level. As you engage with the organization's activities, you might help in budgeting, planning community programs, or simply observing how resources are allocated and managed.
• You can start a policy journal where you document your observations on current policies and brainstorm potential improvements. Keep a notebook or digital document where you jot down daily observations about how different policies affect you and those around you. For example, if you notice traffic congestion is a recurring issue, record your observations and think about alternative traffic management strategies, such as staggered work hours or improved public transportation options.

Food's production, along with its consumption and dissemination, is shaped by the forces of society, culture, and politics.

This part explores the concept that our choices in food and consumption are shaped by a complex interplay of societal, cultural, and political influences, as well as personal tastes. The production and consumption of food worldwide are significantly influenced by elements that may result in the devaluation, adverse views, and possible disappearance of numerous cooking traditions and food varieties.

The historical journey of certain edibles, including small saltwater forage fish and the growth and worldwide spread of bananas and cocoa products, exemplifies their significance in the historical context of colonialism, slavery, and the formation of global economic forces.

Chang demonstrates the way in which everyday food items, such as small fish and tropical fruits, are connected to the broad historical dynamics of colonialism and slavery that have sculpted the world's power hierarchy. He emphasizes that European cravings for these commodities drove the exploitation of both natural resources and labor in the colonized regions.

The writer highlights the unpredictability and lack of sustainability in economies that depend heavily on exporting raw materials, using Peru's guano boom, which was fueled by European demand for bird droppings as fertilizer, as a historical case in point. The development of synthetic fertilizers by German scientists, propelled by technological progress, resulted in the decline of the guano industry and exposed the vulnerability of countries dependent on the trade of natural resources.

Bananas, which arrived in the Americas during an era when plantations thrived on the exploitation of enslaved individuals, epitomize the impact of globalization and corporate power in the oppression of poorer countries. The rise of prominent banana corporations in the United States and their influence in creating countries that depend extensively on one type of agricultural produce highlights the dangers associated with an economy based on a single commodity, as well as the power of dominant companies to erode the sovereignty of nations and exploit the populace for financial gain.

The economic stability of sectors engaged in the manufacture of items, including indigo, has been markedly affected by technological progress and the dependence on basic materials, highlighting how economies that are largely reliant on the commerce of such goods are vulnerable.

Chang emphasizes the precariousness experienced by countries dependent on exporting raw commodities by analyzing the historical evolution of industries involved in the production of guano, natural dyes, and rubber. He illustrates that the growth of these sectors was initially driven by imperial control and the availability of inexpensive workers, but eventually, they saw a downturn as technological progress introduced artificial alternatives and more effective methods of production elsewhere globally.

The author highlights how the rise of synthetic materials, like dyes and rubber, resulted in a downturn for conventional dye industries in countries like Guatemala and had a significant impact on Malaysia's natural rubber commerce. Economies that rely on raw material exports for their financial equilibrium face inherent risks, as sudden advancements in technology or the emergence of stronger competitive markets can quickly destabilize them. Chang argues that a country must progress technologically and industrialize to sustain economic growth, thus lessening its reliance on unprocessed commodities.

Context

• The decline in demand for natural indigo affected agricultural workers and communities dependent on its cultivation, leading to social and economic disruptions.
• As other countries develop more efficient production methods or discover alternative resources, they can outcompete traditional exporters, leading to a loss of market share.
• The shift from natural to synthetic materials often stems from technological innovations that offer cost-effective, scalable, and more reliable alternatives. This transition can rapidly alter global trade dynamics and economic dependencies.
• Technological progress often requires substantial investment in research and development. Countries that invest in technology and innovation can create new industries and job opportunities, reducing their dependence on traditional sectors.
• The invention of synthetic rubber, particularly during World War II, was driven by the need for reliable rubber supplies. This development significantly affected countries like Malaysia, which were major exporters of natural rubber.
• Relying on raw materials can lead to trade imbalances, especially if the country imports high-value manufactured goods, affecting the overall economic health.
• Industrialization can create a wider range of job opportunities compared to sectors focused solely on raw material extraction. This can lead to improved living standards and economic resilience.

Individual tastes, along with broader social, cultural, and political factors, shape our dietary choices and patterns, sometimes leading to the undervaluation or neglect of specific culinary traditions and practices.

Chang explores the idea that our choices in food are shaped by a complex interplay of social, economic, and cultural factors, not solely by our personal preferences. He underscores how societal biases can lead to the reduced valuation or adverse characterization of certain eating practices.

The author uses the example of garlic, revered in Korean cuisine but often viewed with suspicion in Britain, to illustrate how cultural perceptions can dramatically influence the acceptance and popularity of specific ingredients. He also examines the societal hesitance to incorporate insects into our meals, highlighting the stark contrast with the widespread readiness to consume prawns and shrimp, even though they are all arthropods. These instances demonstrate how cultural norms can shape our perceptions of what is edible and desirable, even if seemingly irrational or inconsistent upon closer examination.

Global perspectives on food differ, and cultural norms influence our appreciation and acceptance of different foods, such as the varying attitudes towards garlic, chili peppers, and insects.

Chang delves into how cultural viewpoints shape the acceptance and popularity of various foods, using the incorporation of chili, the consumption of insects, and the utilization of garlic as examples. He delves into the varying cultural views on garlic, observing its crucial place in Korean cuisine, while it is often met with disfavor in British culinary tastes, highlighting how cultural norms shape our taste preferences and assessments.

The author also explores the societal reluctance to consume insects, despite them being a viable and protein-rich option for sustainable nutrition. He contrasts this with the widespread acceptance of consuming arthropods like prawns and shrimp, highlighting how cultural and personal biases shape our views on what is considered unpalatable in different food cultures. These examples illustrate that our food choices are profoundly influenced by cultural norms, frequently extending past the realm of logical consistency.

Practical Tips

• Start a food journal where you document not just what you eat, but the cultural context behind each dish. This can help you become more mindful of how cultural norms shape your diet. For instance, if you have pasta, research its Italian origins and how it became a staple in American households, noting any differences in preparation or consumption.
• Create a fusion recipe challenge with friends where each person brings a dish that combines Korean and British flavors. This social cooking event encourages experimentation with garlic in a fun setting. You might discover a garlic-infused shepherd's pie with a kimchi twist or a roast beef marinated in a garlicky Korean sauce.
• Create a personal food diary tracking your experiences with insect-based dishes. Note the types of insects you've tried, the preparation methods, your initial reactions, and any changes in your perception over time. This reflective practice can help you become more mindful of your dietary choices and the psychological barriers you might be overcoming.
• Host a "Bias Potluck" with friends where each person brings a dish they once found unpalatable or have never tried due to cultural biases. During the meal, discuss your reasons for avoidance and share your experiences with the dish. This could be a dish like natto from Japan, which has a strong smell and sticky texture that may be off-putting to those not used to it, but is considered a delicacy and health food in its native country.

Governmental interventions and regulations play a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory and outcomes of economic growth.

Chang disputes the common perception that the combination of personal entrepreneurial efforts and minimal state intervention are the exclusive catalysts for achieving prosperity in the economy. He argues that the shift towards increased prosperity has been markedly shaped by deliberate actions and policy choices made by governmental bodies.

Many affluent countries have achieved their wealth not by allowing market forces to work without restraint, but by deliberately adopting protective policies and state intervention to nurture and strengthen domestic industries.

Chang challenges the idea that economic success is purely the result of personal effort and the absence of governmental intervention. He provides historical evidence showing that currently affluent nations like the US, Britain, Germany, Japan, and South Korea once depended on protective measures and governmental support to foster their emerging industries in the early phases of their economic development.

The writer contends that a mix of protective tariffs, financial aid, allocated lending, and additional governmental assistance was employed by these nations to protect their emerging sectors from more mature international enterprises. This enabled local manufacturers to enhance their skills and in time, engage in competition internationally. Hyundai, the colossal car manufacturer hailing from South Korea, stands as a quintessential illustration. Initially a modest venture with rudimentary technical resources, the company thrived under the umbrella of governmental safeguards, targeted monetary assistance, and the dedication of its workforce, eventually rising to become one of the leading global automobile manufacturers.

The ascent of local industries in nations like the United States, Germany, Japan, and South Korea can be largely attributed to the strategic imposition of trade barriers, financial inducements, and a range of government-led efforts.

Chang explores historical examples to illustrate the significant impact that government policies have had on stimulating economic expansion. He demonstrates that while the United States currently promotes free trade, it previously imposed significant tariffs in the 19th and early 20th centuries to shield its nascent sectors, particularly from rivals in Britain. Under the shrewd leadership of Germany's Chancellor, the nation introduced protective policies in the late 1800s that were instrumental in the expansion of its iron and steel industries, securing Germany's position as a powerhouse in the worldwide industrial scene.

The author examines the post-World War II strategies employed by Japan and South Korea to nurture their budding industries specializing in advanced technology, such as electronics and vehicles, by implementing safeguards for developing sectors, directing government investments, and carefully distributing loans. The progress and prosperity of these nations demonstrate that active governmental involvement can help overcome initial challenges, creating a conducive atmosphere for industries to thrive and eventually contend on a global stage.

Other Perspectives

• The effectiveness of trade barriers and government intervention can vary greatly depending on the context and may not always lead to positive outcomes for local industries or the economy as a whole.
• The success of nascent industries in the United States during the 19th and early 20th centuries cannot be entirely attributed to tariffs, as the country also benefited from a large influx of skilled immigrants who contributed to the workforce and innovation.
• While Germany's protective policies may have played a role, it's important to consider the influence of other factors such as the country's rich natural resources, including coal and iron ore, which were crucial for the development of the iron and steel industries.
• While Japan and South Korea did implement safeguards and directed investments, it's important to recognize that these strategies alone were not solely responsible for their success; factors such as cultural work ethic, private sector innovation, and unique historical circumstances also played critical roles.
• Government-led efforts may crowd out private investment, as private investors may be reluctant to compete with government-funded entities or may find the market too risky if government policies are subject to sudden changes.

The establishment of welfare systems has played a crucial role in fostering societal cohesion and enhancing economic dynamism in many countries.

Chang contests the portrayal of the welfare state as a hindrance to economic growth, a perspective frequently promoted by proponents of neoliberal policies. He contends that social safety nets are instrumental in fostering social stability and energizing a vibrant economy, rather than discouraging employment or hindering innovation. Safeguarding individuals against major life occurrences like unemployment, medical problems, and the effects of aging enables them to confidently pursue change and take risks, which are essential for stimulating creativity and entrepreneurial activities.

The author emphasizes that Otto von Bismarck, known for creating the country's first extensive social welfare system, launched social insurance programs to mitigate social unrest and strengthen unity within the nation, rather than out of dedication to socialist ideals. Chang highlights the Nordic nations, well-known for their comprehensive social welfare, as consistently leading in innovation and worldwide economic competitiveness. These instances demonstrate that a strong social safety net can foster a community that is empathetic and adaptable, thereby enhancing economic progress instead of obstructing it.

The establishment of social protection programs in Germany by Otto von Bismarck, which were subsequently adopted throughout Europe with an expansion of social security systems, shows that measures designed to protect populations can enhance, rather than hinder, the advancement of the economy.

Chang emphasizes the positive influence of protective social measures on economic growth, as demonstrated by the establishment of the welfare state in Germany under Otto von Bismarck. Bismarck, driven by practical considerations to diminish social discord and strengthen national solidarity, initiated government-backed insurance programs that addressed industrial mishaps, medical care, and retirement funds.

The author emphasizes the growth of social welfare systems across Europe, a progression championed by leftist political parties and, unexpectedly, by moderate-right groups who acknowledged its importance in bolstering societal cohesion and stimulating economic vitality. Chang emphasizes that the welfare state serves as a collective protective mechanism, not just as a way to offer assistance to the underprivileged. By providing monetary support to individuals in tough economic times, it reduces the trepidation associated with risk-taking and fosters a more receptive disposition towards new technological developments and changes within the economy, thus promoting creativity and aiding in the growth of the economy.

Context

• The social protection measures included health insurance, accident insurance, and old-age pensions. These were designed to provide a safety net for workers and their families, ensuring support in case of illness, injury, or retirement.
• The success of European social protection systems eventually influenced welfare policies in other parts of the world, including North America and parts of Asia, as countries sought to emulate the stability and growth seen in Europe.
• The adoption and expansion of social security systems often involved complex political negotiations. While initially championed by socialist and labor movements, these systems gained broader support as conservative and liberal parties recognized their role in maintaining social order and economic stability.
• Reducing poverty and inequality through social measures can lead to a more stable society, which is attractive to investors and can lead to increased economic activity.
• The programs illustrated a practical application of the idea that social welfare can coexist with, and even enhance, capitalist economic systems by creating a more secure and motivated workforce.
• Bismarck's policies were partly motivated by a desire to maintain political stability and prevent uprisings. By addressing some of the grievances of the working class, he aimed to create a more harmonious society.
• These parties typically emphasize principles such as social justice, equality, and solidarity. They argue that social welfare systems are essential for redistributing wealth and ensuring that all members of society have access to basic needs like healthcare, education, and housing.
• As societies evolved, moderate-right groups understood the necessity of adapting to new social realities. Supporting welfare systems was seen as a pragmatic approach to managing the challenges of modern industrial societies.
• Welfare programs can contribute to political stability by addressing the needs of the population, thereby reducing the appeal of extremist movements and maintaining trust in government institutions.
• Welfare systems can adapt to demographic shifts, such as aging populations, by providing pensions and healthcare, ensuring that older citizens remain economically secure and less reliant on family support.
• A stable social environment encourages innovation by allowing people to focus on creative pursuits without the constant fear of financial ruin, which can stifle creativity and experimentation.
• When people feel secure about their financial future, they are more likely to spend money on new technologies, driving demand and encouraging further technological advancements.
• Welfare states often promote inclusivity and diversity, which can lead to a richer exchange of ideas. Diverse perspectives are known to enhance creativity and lead to more innovative solutions in various fields.
• Access to healthcare and financial support can lead to a healthier, more productive workforce. When workers are not worried about basic needs, they can focus better on their jobs, leading to increased productivity and economic output.