PDF Summary:Currency Wars, by James Rickards

In the wake of increasing globalization, nations have revived the centuries-old doctrine of mercantilism — using state-backed corporations, currency manipulation, and other economic tactics to advance their strategic interests. In Currency Wars, James Rickards explores this modern form of state capitalism and its destabilizing impact on the global financial system.

He examines how competitive currency devaluations between major powers, quantitative easing by central banks, and governments leveraging economic tools as weapons threaten the dominance of the U.S. dollar. Rickards evaluates the systemic risks arising from these complex financial networks and assesses potential paths forward, ranging from a multi-currency system to a return of the gold standard.

(continued)...

Rickards delves into the historical episodes across the 20th century when countries intentionally devalued their monetary units. Rickards demonstrates that, in response to economic challenges, countries have consistently resorted to altering the value of their currencies, tracing a pattern from the intentional devaluation of currency in the 1920s and 1930s to the era characterized by variable exchange rates during the 1970s and 1980s. He argues that the cyclical nature of currency devaluation followed by reciprocal measures is inherently damaging, leading to trade disruptions, global unrest, and often exacerbating the problems it aims to address. Rickards underscores the continuation of the harmful sequence of events that marked the emergence of the third Currency War in 2010.

Nations deliberately lower the value of their own currency as a strategy to capture economic growth that might otherwise advantage their trade partners.

The author details the tactic of deliberately lowering the value of a nation's currency to enhance its economic stance, which detrimentally affects other countries. Nations resort to the tactical reduction of their currency's value to boost their export appeal, which results in their exported goods becoming less expensive and the price of their imports rising. This strategy momentarily bolsters the nation's economy that opts to devalue its currency but simultaneously hampers the growth and job prospects of its trading partners, prompting them to resort to comparable measures of currency reduction. A cycle of mutual devaluations among currencies can trigger a perilous descent, potentially resulting in the disintegration of international commerce and the erosion of confidence in the global financial system.

Previous disputes resulted in significant consequences that affected both the economy and politics, such as the period known as the Great Depression.

Rickards highlights the economic instability of the 1920s and 1930s as a precursor to the catastrophic economic downturn known as the Great Depression. He argues that in that period, the aggressive reduction in the worth of currencies, combined with isolationist economic policies and a rigid adherence to an outdated gold-standard monetary system, precipitated a disaster that led to the global economic downturn. The rise of fascism and the subsequent onset of World War II, fueled by widespread unemployment, social unrest, and political instability, serve as a stark warning of the perils associated with unchecked currency devaluations.

The ongoing struggle over currency dominance is rooted in significant government debt, lax fiscal policies, and the waning global influence attributed to the U.S. dollar.

The relentless struggle concerning currency mainly stems from the government's continuous overspending, which results in debt reaching unsustainable heights. Countries are increasingly employing strategies that devalue their monetary units and drive up costs to reduce the burden of their debts. The predicament has deteriorated due to the broad financial policies enacted by the United States' central banking system, including the adoption of measures known as quantitative easing. Rickards additionally emphasizes the waning impact of the American currency in international affairs within this context. The euro and other currencies like the Chinese yuan are gaining influence, resulting in a monetary system that is more multipolar and prone to fluctuations and instability as trust in the dollar wanes.

The competitive devaluation of currencies and subsequent actions by different countries can be traced back to the quantitative easing policies implemented by the Federal Reserve.

Rickards argues that the U.S. Federal Reserve's strategic use of quantitative easing has escalated the ongoing battle over the valuation of currencies. He explains that the launch of initiatives that created vast amounts of fresh capital to purchase government bonds has flooded the global financial system with low-cost dollars, which in turn has diminished the value of the dollar. This has sparked fears of inflation around the world, forcing other countries to intervene in currency markets, impose capital controls, or resort to their own forms of currency devaluation to protect their economies and export sectors.

The ongoing battle for currency supremacy might lead to the emergence of alternative reserve currencies, increase the importance of the IMF's Special Drawing Rights, bring back the gold standard, or cause a disorderly collapse of the existing monetary system that is dependent on the dollar.

Rickards outlines four potential outcomes for the world's financial system, each posing a threat to the supremacy of the U.S. dollar: (1) a shift towards a system with multiple reserve currencies, (2) the emergence of the International Monetary Fund's Special Drawing Rights (SDR) as the leading global currency, (3) a revival of gold as the central asset underpinning currencies, or (4) an uncontrolled downturn that results in the dollar's reduced influence within the global monetary framework. Rickards emphasizes the critical nature of careful planning when implementing a gold standard, pointing out that alternative methods yield a combination of advantages and disadvantages, while also drawing attention to the inherent instability and related risks.

The evaluation considers both the benefits and drawbacks of each potential outcome, ranging from the chance of a sudden and catastrophic collapse to a more orderly and controlled shift.

Rickards weighs the pros and cons of each potential endgame. He suggests that a global financial system supported by multiple reserve currencies could seem more stable, but in reality, it could escalate the rivalry among nations to devalue their currencies because there is no singular entity to maintain equilibrium. Influential global personalities might find the creation of Special Drawing Rights by the International Monetary Fund appealing, but fundamentally, these are just another form of currency without inherent worth, prone to variations and influence from outside forces. The proposal to return to a gold-based monetary system, which could lead to more stable prices and currency valuations, often meets opposition from those who profit from the current financial system. This scenario has the potential to trigger an economic collapse of a magnitude that surpasses all previous financial crises. Rickards argues that the complexity and intertwined nature of the worldwide financial system, along with extensive use of borrowed money, increase the likelihood of a chaotic collapse rather than a smooth transition to a sturdier economic structure.

Other Perspectives

• While historical trends show cycles of devaluation, it's also true that some countries have maintained strong currencies to support purchasing power and reduce the cost of imports.
• Currency devaluation as a strategy for economic growth is not universally accepted; some economists argue that long-term growth is better supported by productivity and innovation rather than competitive devaluation.
• The link between currency devaluation and global unrest is complex and may not be directly causal; other factors like political instability, economic mismanagement, and social issues also play significant roles.
• The causes of the Great Depression are multifaceted, with currency devaluation being just one aspect; over-speculation, banking collapses, and policy errors are also cited as contributing factors.
• The decline in the influence of the U.S. dollar is debated; some argue that the dollar still remains the dominant global currency due to the depth and liquidity of U.S. financial markets.
• The effects of quantitative easing are contested; some economists believe that QE helped prevent deeper recessions and deflationary spirals following the financial crisis.
• The potential for a multipolar currency system or a return to the gold standard is subject to debate; critics argue that such systems could be impractical and may not address underlying economic issues.
• The idea of a catastrophic collapse is speculative; some analysts suggest that the global financial system has mechanisms in place to prevent such outcomes and that gradual adjustments are more likely.

The intricate nature of financial systems can lead to instability and potentially result in their downfall.

This part explores how the principles of intricate systems expose the inherent weaknesses within the global financial framework. Rickards demonstrates how the growth and intricate connections within financial markets, combined with the attitudes of investors and policymakers, create a delicate system that is vulnerable to catastrophic collapse.

The theory of complexity offers an understanding of the intrinsic instability and unpredictability present in the current international financial and currency markets.

The book offers a complexity theory-based conceptual framework developed by the author to understand the nuanced dynamics of the financial markets. Rickards utilizes theories from various fields to argue that markets are not just complex but inherently advanced, with the ability to spontaneously organize and susceptible to sudden, significant shifts. He contrasts this comprehensive viewpoint with the classic economic models that assume logical actions, effectiveness, interdependence, and uniformly distributed risk, emphasizing that these standard methods do not fully grasp the complexities and operations of financial markets.

Complex systems naturally develop internal organization, often acquiring new characteristics, and they can experience abrupt state transitions that may result in severe malfunctions.

The author examines the unique characteristics of complex networks in relation to the realm of financial markets. The collective actions of numerous participants can inadvertently result in the creation of market bubbles and precipitate economic downturns, as these systems tend to naturally establish order. Complex systems frequently appear to be in equilibrium until they reach a critical threshold, at which juncture they can rapidly transition to an alternate condition, characterized by a series of malfunctions and an abrupt, catastrophic collapse.

The growth, heightened leverage, and more extensive interlinkage of the capital markets have led to a significant escalation in systemic risk.

Rickards argues that the global financial markets' substantial growth and heightened dependency on leveraged funds have markedly amplified systemic vulnerabilities. He explains how the complex web created by international economic integration connects various financial institutions, including banks and hedge funds, with sovereign wealth funds, making it difficult to limit failures to just one organization or industry. The probability of a disastrous collapse increases significantly with the growing complexity and interconnectivity of the system, making it more vulnerable to small disturbances.

Traditional methods of assessing financial hazards, like the approach known as VaR, tend to ignore broader consequences by focusing only on net positions rather than the total exposure and fail to sufficiently consider how complex systems behave during pivotal moments.

Rickards highlights the shortcomings of widely used risk evaluation methods, such as the models employed by banks and regulatory agencies that are commonly known as Value at Risk (VaR). He criticizes these models for relying on flawed assumptions about the unpredictability, effectiveness, and conventional allocation of risk. He argues that these models fail to adequately account for the crucial interconnectedness and complex behaviors of intricate systems, leading to a neglect of possible systemic risks and consequently exposing the financial framework to a perilous collapse.

The principles of behavioral economics play a crucial role in exacerbating financial instability, thereby increasing the likelihood of a total collapse of the system.

Rickards emphasizes the importance of utilizing behavioral economics principles to understand how human psychology and unforeseen behaviors influence market fluctuations. He references studies conducted by the group led by Daniel Kahneman to show how minor events can be intensified into significant disruptions due to cognitive biases, emotional reactions, and group behaviors. The susceptibility of intricate systems to psychological influences amplifies their instability, leading to sentiment-driven abrupt changes and initiating self-reinforcing cycles that can propel markets to extreme levels.

How irrational biases, herd behavior, and the use of flawed theories by policy makers can create positive feedback loops leading to crises.

Rickards explains that markets on the brink may undergo sudden and drastic changes as a result of irrational actions and the tendency of individuals to emulate one another, connecting the concepts of behavioral economics with the scrutiny of complex networks. He argues that when policymakers depend on flawed economic models, their attempts to address problems frequently exacerbate them, particularly the notion that state spending can stimulate economic growth, which can set off a series of events that intensify the initial issues. This results in a dangerous cycle where excessive dependence on conventional economic models and an inability to fully acknowledge intrinsic risks render the entire financial edifice more susceptible to sudden and unexpected disturbances.

Context

• Complexity theory applied to financial markets examines how interconnected elements within the market can lead to unpredictable and nonlinear behaviors. It suggests that financial systems are not just complicated but exhibit emergent properties and can undergo sudden, significant changes. This theory challenges traditional economic models by emphasizing the non-linear relationships and feedback loops that can amplify risks and vulnerabilities within the financial system. By understanding the complex interactions and behaviors within financial markets, analysts can better grasp the potential for systemic instabilities and catastrophic collapses.
• Value at Risk (VaR) is a widely used risk management metric that estimates the potential loss in value of a portfolio or investment over a specific time frame and with a certain level of confidence. It provides a numerical measure of the maximum loss that an investment or portfolio could suffer under normal market conditions within a given time frame. VaR is calculated based on historical data and statistical methods, helping financial institutions and investors understand the potential downside risk of their investments. However, VaR has limitations, such as assuming that market conditions will remain similar to historical data, and it may not account for extreme events or systemic risks adequately.
• Behavioral economics principles study how psychological factors influence economic decisions. In financial markets, these principles show how human emotions and biases can lead to irrational behaviors. This can result in market fluctuations driven by factors like herd behavior, cognitive biases, and emotional reactions. Understanding these principles helps explain why markets can experience sudden and extreme changes due to human psychology rather than purely rational decision-making.
• Positive feedback loops in financial crises occur when actions or events lead to further actions that intensify the original impact, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of behavior. In financial markets, this can manifest as investors selling assets due to fear, causing prices to drop further, which then prompts more selling. This continuous loop can amplify market movements, leading to rapid and sometimes extreme changes in asset prices and market conditions. Understanding and managing these feedback loops is crucial in mitigating the escalation of financial crises.