PDF Summary:Courtiers, by Valentine Low

In Courtiers, Valentine Low takes readers behind the scenes of the British monarchy, offering an inside look at the individuals who have dedicated their careers to serving the royal family. The book explores how this elite group has evolved to include modern expertise from various fields while managing the often conflicting demands of their royal employers and the institution itself.

As their roles expanded beyond simple household management, courtiers found themselves shaping public perception of the royal family and influencing key events. Low sheds light on the intricate strategies they employ to balance personal obligations with preserving the monarchy's enduring stability—all while navigating internal rivalries and the complexities of aligning the different royal households.

(continued)...

Courtiers tread a fine line, endeavoring to accommodate the personal desires of their royal employers while also ensuring the enduring reputation and stability of the royal institution.

The book recounts numerous occasions where individual ambitions conflicted with the objectives of the organization. Michael Fawcett, who initially joined Prince Charles's staff as a footman, eventually rose to oversee his charitable endeavors through the Prince's Foundation. Low portrays Fawcett as someone with a natural aptitude for understanding and reliably meeting Charles's requirements. For over forty years, he endured both rejections and negative public sentiment, yet his extraordinary bond with the prince remained unbroken, even though it caused divisions among his relatives. In 2021, the situation came to an abrupt end when Fawcett resigned following persistent media allegations, due to accusations that a Saudi billionaire who had made financial contributions to the charitable organizations of Charles was promised a knighthood.

Courtiers frequently partake in competition, deceit, and tactical maneuvering to influence the perceptions held by members of the royal household.

Low portrays the inner workings of the monarchy in a manner that echoes the shrewd strategies and political intrigue characteristic of Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall, which portrays an era filled with ambition, power struggles, and betrayal during the Tudor period. The employees serving Charles navigated a challenging environment, marked by internal rivalries as courtiers vied for sway, discreetly steered their leader, and aimed to discredit their colleagues in hopes of becoming his foremost advisor. Low recounts that Edward Adeane, who followed in the footsteps of his father Michael Adeane and carved out a notable legal career, assumed the position of personal assistant to Charles in 1979, but soon discerned that the role was not a good fit for his skills and temperament. Adeane, a rigid individual, often found himself at odds with Diana and his frustration grew as he noticed that Charles paid little heed to his counsel, which differed significantly from Charles's forward-thinking and charitable ambitions. Valentine Low references the former minister Lord Luce, who served as the Queen's Lord Chamberlain at the dawn of the 21st century, and describes the royal existence as one typified by abundant free time, rampant gossip, eager anticipation of upcoming social events, and participation in traditional pastimes like hunting and fishing. Luce observed that the activities of courtly intrigue unmistakably saturated the environment of Charles's court, even though the monarch showed little interest in such schemes.

The task of aligning and controlling the conduct of different royals frequently encounters obstacles because of the inherent distrust and friction between the distinct royal households.

The book "Courtiers" delves into the ongoing rivalry within the royal household and Buckingham Palace, which stems from their desire for public acclaim, fair distribution of resources, and favored status. Low depicts the dynamics within the royal household as sometimes strained, particularly when Prince Charles's personnel exhibit caution in their dealings with some of the Queen's most trusted advisors. Staff members employed by Charles often feel exasperated because they perceive that palace officials hinder their efforts to support their principal and help him fulfill his destined position, resulting in clashes over schedules and disagreements about the pecking order among the royals. The internal discord, exemplified by the significant confrontation with Prince Charles's personnel, led to the Queen's private secretary, Sir Christopher Geidt, being ousted from his role.

Other Perspectives

• The depiction of courtiers as primarily loyal to individual royals rather than the monarchy might be oversimplified; some may argue that their loyalty to the institution inherently includes allegiance to its members.
• The idea that courtiers engage in deceit and maneuvering could be challenged by the perspective that they are professionals operating within a complex system, where strategic communication is necessary and not inherently deceptive.
• The notion of inherent rivalry and competition among courtiers might be contested by the view that collaboration and teamwork are also prevalent and essential aspects of court life.
• The portrayal of the monarchy as a hotbed of intrigue and conflict could be seen as a dramatization that overlooks the mundane, bureaucratic, and often harmonious aspects of royal service.
• The suggestion that granting too much power to staff members is hazardous might be countered by the argument that experienced and trusted aides are essential for the effective functioning of the monarchy.
• The concept of a loyalty dilemma could be criticized for assuming that courtiers cannot simultaneously serve individual royals and the institution without conflict.
• The idea that aligning and controlling the conduct of different royals frequently encounters obstacles might be challenged by highlighting successful coordination and unity within the royal household.
• The assertion that rivalry within the royal household primarily stems from a desire for public acclaim and resources could be countered by the argument that such rivalries are rare and that most staff are dedicated to their roles without seeking personal gain.

The royal attendants' adept handling of public image and their impact on significant national occurrences.

The book depicts how courtiers are instrumental in molding both the inner workings and the external perception of the monarchy. Low describes the shift in the royal household's approach to media relations, moving from a stance of disregarding even the most egregious inaccuracies in reporting to one that embraces a modern tactic of proactive engagement with journalists.

The strategic maneuvers of the palace's staff significantly shape the royal family's engagement with the media and public discourse.

Low highlighted how the smooth functioning of the monarchy was advantageous for both the aides within the royal household and their higher-ups. If the institution fails to hold on to public support, or is seen as anachronistic or irrelevant, their jobs will disappear along with everyone else’s.

The approach of courtiers has evolved from one of careful balance to a strategy that is both flexible and forward-looking when dealing with the media.

The royal family has gradually shifted its strategy regarding media engagement, transitioning from a conventional attitude of indifference or reliance on the media's courteous restraint. Low credits the metamorphosis to the tactical measures suggested by the Queen's press secretary, Sir William Heseltine, who championed a more deliberate method of engaging with the media starting in the 1960s. This involved not only enhancing the availability of information but also creatively presenting the daily life of the monarchy through television and diverse events to garner attention for each royal family member. In 1969, the climax occurred with the release of "Royal Family," a documentary that provided an intimate glimpse into the lives of the Queen and her relatives, showcasing scenes that featured interactions between Her Majesty and the American ambassador, along with their casual outdoor meals in the Scottish estate. The successful public experiment also ignited debates over how much of the royal family's personal matters should be revealed to the public.

Advisors within the court endeavor to protect the prestige of the royal institution and influence how it is viewed by the public by offering advice on important issues and conflicts.

Members of the royal household make it a point to stay neutral on political matters, receiving sage advice from their advisors during significant events in the nation. Valentine Low details how the assistants of Princes William and Harry devised a plan to oversee the media portrayal of Harry's military stint in Afghanistan in 2007, as well as their subsequent attempts to deal with the turmoil that ensued when this information was leaked. He also explores the fallout from the 1986 'Sunday Times affair,' when the newspaper revealed a report based on private sources from Buckingham Palace, which suggested that the Queen was discontented with how Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was handling state affairs. During a tumultuous time in Britain, with Thatcher facing condemnation for deepening social divisions, the royal household found it crucial to adopt measures that would preserve the image of the sovereign's neutrality in her official capacity regarding political factions.

The skillfulness of the royal household's staff in maintaining the delicate balance between the monarchy and the nation's political institutions is crucial during significant national events.

Low emphasizes the monarchy's essential function in preserving neutrality in politics, illustrating how courtiers are instrumental in facilitating communication between the realm of politics and the royal household. The royal household frequently collaborates with senior government figures, especially during general elections, to maintain constitutional propriety when a fresh prime ministerial appointment is made. The book details how the power shift after the 2010 election was smoothly managed through the efforts of the Queen's private secretary, Sir Christopher Geidt, who worked closely with Jeremy Heywood, the principal private secretary to the prime minister, and Gus O'Donnell, the cabinet secretary. The administration maintained the enduring stability of Britain's unwritten constitution, supported fundamentally by a trio of key individuals whose close relationship was often referred to as the "Golden Triangle." The book describes how, after the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, Geidt and Heywood crafted a subtle approach that allowed the Queen to express her hope for voters to consider their choices thoughtfully, thereby maintaining her impartiality and avoiding any hint of political bias.

Other Perspectives

• The effectiveness of courtiers in shaping the monarchy's public image can be overstated, as public opinion is influenced by a wide range of factors beyond their control.
• The transition to proactive media engagement may not always result in positive outcomes, as increased visibility can also lead to greater scrutiny and potential public relations missteps.
• The aim of advisors to protect the institution's prestige could sometimes conflict with the public's right to transparency and accountability from their national figures.
• The maintenance of a delicate balance between the monarchy and political institutions can be perceived as undemocratic or opaque, as the monarchy is an unelected institution and its influence on politics should be minimal or non-existent in a modern democracy.