PDF Summary:Boys Will Be Boys, by Jeff Pearlman

In Boys Will Be Boys, Jeff Pearlman provides an inside look at the dramatic rise and eventual fall of the Dallas Cowboys under the leadership of Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson. The book chronicles how the team transitioned from a laughingstock to a championship contender in the early 1990s, thanks to Johnson's unconventional methods and bold personnel decisions.

Yet as the Cowboys enjoyed unprecedented success, tension grew between the brash owner Jones and the driven coach Johnson. Pearlman details their escalating power struggle, which ultimately led to Johnson's departure and Barry Switzer's tenure as head coach. Under Switzer, the team's discipline waned, setting the stage for a decline marked by off-field controversies and missed opportunities.

(continued)...

Johnson encountered scenarios where he perceived Jones' behavior as undermining his authority, leading to consequences that disrupted the squad's cohesion and vision for future planning.

Pearlman provides a detailed account of instances where Johnson felt his control was being undermined by Jones, showing how this weakening led to a decline in the team's morale and the interpersonal relationship between the two men. Pearlman's account reveals how Johnson harbored hidden resentment stemming from Jones's favoritism towards Aikman, which led to tension and discomfort within the squad, especially amid the competition for the quarterback position between Steve Walsh and Aikman. The author reveals the conflict between Johnson and Jones over rigid contract negotiation positions with key players like Emmitt Smith, which resulted in Smith joining the 1993 training camp later than expected and created unnecessary tension. Jones's inflated ego played a pivotal role in disrupting the team's cohesion and putting future victories at risk.

Other Perspectives

• The perceived undermining could be a result of poor communication between Johnson and Jones, where actions were misinterpreted or intentions were not clearly conveyed.
• The tension over the quarterback position and contract negotiations might reflect normal challenges faced by any competitive sports team and not necessarily the result of Jones's inflated ego.
• It is possible that Jones' actions were not undermining but rather an attempt to assert his own legitimate role within the team's hierarchy.
• The relationship between authority and morale is complex, and a decline in morale could have been due to a lack of clear communication or other leadership issues, rather than the undermining of authority.
• Johnson's resentment may not have been entirely hidden; it could have been apparent to those closely observing the dynamics within the team.
• The discomfort might have been a temporary issue that was amplified by other underlying team dynamics rather than favoritism alone.
• Competition is a natural and healthy part of any sports team, and it can often bring out the best in players, leading to improved performance.
• It is the responsibility of team management to negotiate contracts in the best interest of the team, which can sometimes lead to tough decisions that are not universally popular.
• Smith's own decision-making process and negotiation strategy could have contributed to his late arrival, as players often weigh their options carefully before committing to a contract.
• The favoritism towards Aikman might have been based on objective assessments of player performance and potential rather than personal bias stemming from ego.
• Conflict within a team can sometimes lead to clearer communication and the resolution of underlying issues, which might strengthen the team in the long run and enhance their chances of winning.

The team's fortunes waned when leadership transitioned to Barry Switzer.

Pearlman narrates how the Dallas Cowboys underwent a change from Jimmy Johnson's disciplined and structured guidance to Barry Switzer's laxer regime, suggesting that this change, even with continued success on the field, marked the beginning of their decline. He emphasizes that Switzer's tenure, although it included a Super Bowl win, was marked by a decline in discipline, an increase in player misconduct, and a gradual erosion of the strong foundation established by Johnson. Pearlman contends that this shift altered the squad's focus from a relentless pursuit of superiority to a culture marked by complacency and an entitlement mentality.

The community harbored skepticism regarding Switzer's qualifications upon his appointment, setting the stage for his tenure.

Pearlman details the skepticism that both fans of the Dallas team and the Texas press harbored when Switzer assumed the role of head coach. He notes Switzer's connection to the Oklahoma Sooners, who are often looked upon unfavorably in Texas, and he chronicles his tumultuous exit, which was characterized by numerous scandals stemming from player misconduct and violations of NCAA regulations. The writer highlights that the selection of Switzer was widely regarded as an effort by Jones to identify a more compliant and accommodating successor to the triumphant coach.

Questions about Switzer's history and his ability to guide an experienced squad were frequently compared to Johnson's methods.

The author emphasizes the contrasting methods of Switzer and Johnson, pointing out that Switzer lacked the essential proficiency and authoritative leadership required to steer a team to championship success. Jeff Pearlman delves into Switzer's history at Oklahoma, emphasizing his ethical lapses, allegations of overlooking wrongdoing among his players, and his inclination toward a ground-oriented wishbone offense, which clashed with the customary tactics and roster composition of the Dallas team. The authors indicated that this era was characterized by considerable turmoil and instability.

Practical Tips

• Create a personal code of conduct that outlines how you will handle ethical challenges in your daily life. This could include commitments to honesty, fairness, and responsibility. For instance, you might decide that you will always acknowledge your mistakes and learn from them, or that you will not take credit for others' work.
• Develop your strategic thinking by playing turn-based strategy games with friends or family. These games often require foresight, planning, and leadership to win. As you play, consciously reflect on your decision-making process and consider how the strategies you use in the game could translate to real-life team management scenarios.
• Engage in a weekly practice of mindfulness or meditation focused on embracing change. This can help you become more adaptable and less fearful of instability. Start with just five minutes a day and gradually increase the time as you become more comfortable with the practice.

Switzer's more relaxed approach to coaching was a stark departure from Jimmy Johnson's strict and commanding style, leading to a notable transformation in the team's cultural dynamics.

Pearlman highlights the stark difference in the team's guiding principles, transitioning from Johnson's structured approach to Switzer's more relaxed and lenient style of leadership. Switzer cultivated a team atmosphere that prioritized interpersonal relationships and collective morale, placing less focus on rigid discipline and meticulous strategizing, unlike Johnson who demanded an absolute dedication to the sport. During his tenure as leader, the team experienced a relaxation of strict curfews, a reduction in the intensity of practice routines, and an overall softening of the stringent standards that typified the era.

Players exploited the lenient disciplinary tactics of their mentors, resulting in diminished responsibility.

Pearlman portrays the team's downfall as a consequence of the players, initially fatigued by Johnson's stringent requirements, taking advantage of their new coach's lenient methods, which resulted in a steady decline in their self-discipline and on-field results. He portrays the team as increasingly caught up in the seduction of fame and victory, engaging in wild parties, substance abuse, and a series of events unrelated to the game, all the while harboring a conviction that they were immune to repercussions. Pearlman suggests that this behavior eroded the disciplined, contest-driven atmosphere previously cultivated by Johnson, resulting in a gradual decline of accountability and overall distinction.

Other Perspectives

• The concept of 'exploitation' implies a one-sided benefit, whereas players and mentors may both contribute to and be affected by the disciplinary environment.
• The responsibility for maintaining discipline and high performance standards is shared among all members of the organization, including the players, coaching staff, and management, not just the coach.
• The term "fatigued" could be too strong to describe the players' reactions to Johnson's requirements; they might have been challenged but not necessarily worn out.
• The players' behavior might have been a result of individual choices and personalities rather than the collective seduction of fame and victory.
• It's possible that the disciplined, contest-driven atmosphere was not sustainable in the long term, and the decline was an inevitable adjustment rather than a direct consequence of the players' behavior.
• The concept of distinction can be subjective, and what may seem like a decline to some could be viewed as a shift towards a different set of values or priorities by others.
• The belief in immunity could have been a facade or a form of bravado rather than a genuine conviction, masking underlying concerns about consequences.

As the team's discipline waned, so too did their achievements, indicating a departure from their status as frontrunners in the pursuit of the Super Bowl championship.

The author depicts the gradual yet clear erosion of the Cowboys' dominance. He observes that although the team continued to achieve a measure of success, exemplified by their victory in the NFL's thirtieth Super Bowl, their performance was characterized by inconsistency, squandered chances, questionable choices, and an absence of the intense, unwavering determination that defined the Johnson era. Pearlman contends that the team's performance declined due to a gradual decline in discipline and a diminishing commitment to excellence, resulting in players and their leaders increasingly tolerating mediocre outcomes.

The squad's reputation diminished due to a period characterized by player indiscipline and unwise management choices, leading to the departure of key individuals.

Pearlman recounts several critical events that symbolize the decline of the Dallas football team, emphasizing a series of player-related scandals - such as Erik Williams's DUI incident and sexual assault accusations, the struggles with addiction that plagued Michael Irvin, and the increasingly unpredictable actions of Charles Haley - in addition to Jerry Jones's increasingly poor choices in the draft. He contends that such events reflected a culture increasingly permissive of subpar standards and laxity, underscoring the significant divergence between the eras of Johnson and Switzer. Pearlman contends that a string of unrelenting controversies led to the departure of many experienced players and sullied the team's image, ultimately resulting in the Cowboys becoming synonymous with arrogance, entitlement, and chaos.

Context

• Jerry Jones, the owner of the Cowboys, was known for his hands-on management style, which sometimes led to tension with coaches and players.
• Losing star players can affect a team's financial standing, as these players often draw in fans and sponsorships, impacting revenue.
• Incidents involving players like Williams often affect team morale and cohesion. Teammates may become distracted or divided, impacting their performance and focus during games and practices.
• Irvin's struggles with addiction, particularly with cocaine, led to legal issues and suspensions, which disrupted team dynamics and affected his on-field performance.
• Haley was later diagnosed with bipolar disorder, which may have contributed to his unpredictable behavior during his playing career.
• Repeated poor draft decisions can lead to a cycle of underperformance, affecting team morale, fan support, and financial success.
• Comparing the Cowboys' situation to other NFL teams that maintained discipline and success during the same period can highlight the impact of leadership and cultural differences on team performance.
• Johnson was known for his keen eye in player evaluation and management, often making bold decisions that paid off. Switzer inherited a team with established stars but struggled to maintain the same level of player discipline and motivation.
• A focus on rebuilding or changing the team culture might prompt management to part ways with players who are seen as part of the problem.
• The behavior of key players off the field, including legal issues and substance abuse, contributed to a narrative of entitlement and lack of accountability.

The transformation that propelled the Dallas Cowboys to overcome obstacles and clinch Super Bowl titles, as well as the team's high-profile members, has significantly impacted societal norms.

Pearlman explores how a sports team that was initially struggling evolved into an emblem of fame and opulence. The author highlights Jerry Jones' relentless pursuit of fame and prosperity, which transformed the team into a widely acclaimed entity. The athletes were suddenly in the national limelight, leading to a way of life characterized by minimal self-control, an obsession with celebrity status, and a tendency toward overindulgence among numerous members.

The Cowboys transformed into a squad recognized for their prominent public image, moving away from Landry's low-key style to make the most of opportunities for media exposure.

Pearlman traces the transformation of the Cowboys' image, transitioning from the understated and dignified era linked with Tom Landry to an age marked by flamboyance and audacity under the ownership of Jerry Jones. The book describes how the team's owner pursued marketing and publicity opportunities tirelessly, how the team adopted the nickname synonymous with national representation, and how they involved stars such as actress Elizabeth Taylor and musician Babyface to be associated with the franchise. This shift, as Pearlman points out, signified a move away from a sole focus on the strategies of the game to embracing the charm and financial benefits that come with celebrity status.

Jerry Jones's expertise in marketing, along with the growing popularity of the athletes, had a profound impact on both the team's dynamics and its image in the eyes of the public.

Pearlman delves into the repercussions that arose from Jones's aggressive marketing tactics, which, although financially advantageous, fractured the team's cohesion and fostered a sense of entitlement. The Dallas squad, frequently in the spotlight during national TV broadcasts and well-rewarded by Jones for their triumphs, gradually embraced a way of life that blended their athletic excellence with the glamour of celebrity status. Pearlman suggests that this development resulted in an increasing divide between sportsmen and their fans, while also diminishing the focus on perseverance and dedication, which are essential to the foundational values of success.

Other Perspectives

• It's possible that the team's dynamics and public image would have evolved similarly due to the natural progression of sports media and the increasing celebrity status of athletes, regardless of Jones's marketing efforts.
• The fracture in team cohesion might not be directly attributable to marketing tactics; other factors such as team management decisions, personality clashes among players, or external pressures could also play significant roles.
• Exposure during national TV broadcasts and rewards from management could also be seen as a recognition of the athletes' hard work and talent, rather than a direct cause of blending athletic excellence with celebrity status.
• The idea that a glamorous lifestyle diminishes focus on perseverance and dedication assumes that external appearances and personal discipline cannot coexist, which may not be true for all athletes.
• It could be argued that the sense of entitlement is not necessarily negative if it leads to players advocating for their worth and better conditions within their profession.
• The perception of a divide could be subjective and vary among different groups of fans; some might feel a greater connection to athletes who enjoy success and celebrity status.
• Financial advantages gained from marketing could be reinvested into the team to further enhance training, facilities, and support systems, which could reinforce the values of success rather than undermine them.

The transformation of the Hoopsters basketball squad mirrored the Cowboys' transition from a focus on collective principles to an emphasis on the athletes' tendencies toward egocentric actions and frequently solitary endeavors.

Pearlman describes how the Cowboys' engagement in offseason basketball with their Hoopsters team exemplified a change in the team's priorities. Initially envisioned as an initiative to connect with the community, designed to raise money for local causes and showcase the players' likable characteristics, the Hoopsters, first under the direction of Jones and later under the stewardship of another key figure, slowly evolved into an affair that focused mainly on financial gain, placing winning at the forefront, and indulging in lavish festivities following the games.

Michael Irvin played a pivotal role in defining the spirit of the Hoopsters, marking a transition in the team's priorities.

The author depicts the team's transformation by emphasizing Michael Irvin's rise among the football players. He depicts Irvin as a crucial element of the squad, whose individual determination and propensity to challenge limits raised the squad's ambitions and stature. The basketball players redirected their attention from charitable activities to self-promotion, the quest for victory, and for many, the continuation of their extravagant ways beyond the basketball court. Pearlman noted a marked change within the squad, as it slowly moved away from the core principles that had once been pivotal to its achievements.

Context

• The term "Hoopsters" likely refers to a group or team involved in basketball, possibly a recreational or charity-based team that included athletes from other sports.
• The move away from core principles suggests a tension between traditional sportsmanship and the emerging focus on individualism and entertainment in sports.
• Within sports teams, there can be a strong influence from peers to conform to certain behaviors, including partying and spending, as a way to bond and fit in with the group.
• Michael Irvin, known for his charismatic and bold personality, often pushed boundaries both on and off the field. His influence likely encouraged a shift in focus from traditional team values to more individualistic and competitive pursuits.

The squad's conduct beyond their official duties and their various excesses revealed a stark difference from the carefully constructed perception of wholesomeness associated with the team.

Pearlman delivers a thorough examination of how the personal misconduct and controversies involving players off the field tarnished the image of "America's Team," emphasizing the dark elements that intertwined with the Cowboys' victories. He explores stories of rampant celebration, substance misuse, and the habitual visiting of adult entertainment venues, activities that were once overlooked but typically concealed from the general populace. Under Switzer's guidance, the atmosphere intensified, partly because of a lenient disciplinary policy and a tacit endorsement from the organization's higher-ups, who considered such conduct an acceptable byproduct of success. The writer argues that while some team members saw these indulgences as harmless and pleasurable, they ultimately fostered an attitude of arrogance and entitlement that undermined the team's cohesion and reputation within the community.

The White House stands as a stark example of the players' unrestrained lifestyle, emphasizing the growing excesses and the organization's tolerance for misconduct.

Pearlman presents the infamously dubbed “White House,” a house rented by several players near the team’s practice facility, as a powerful emblem of the Cowboys’ unrestrained lifestyle and the organization's apathy towards misconduct. The writer vividly depicts the home as a haven where indulgence in narcotics, sexual escapades, and unrestrained celebrations take place. The White House, intended as an exclusive sanctuary for a select few, epitomized the broader societal issues that plagued the team during the period after Johnson's leadership, a result of its existence along with either the tacit approval or intentional neglect by the team's management. The disclosure further damaged the franchise's reputation, cementing the perception that it had deviated from its moral course in the quest for gridiron victories.

Context

• The "White House" was a nickname given to a house rented by Dallas Cowboys players in the 1990s, known for its association with off-field controversies and excesses.
• The activities at the White House raised questions about legal liabilities and ethical responsibilities of the team’s management in monitoring and guiding player behavior.
• The house became symbolic of the NFL's struggle with player conduct issues during the era, reflecting broader challenges in managing athlete behavior.
• The term "exclusive sanctuary" implies that access to the house was limited to a select group of players, suggesting a sense of privilege and secrecy surrounding its use.
• The financial success of the NFL and its teams during this period led to increased player salaries and endorsements, which may have contributed to a sense of invincibility and entitlement among players.
• Fans and the public were disillusioned by the revelations, as the Cowboys were not just a sports team but a cultural symbol, and the scandal tarnished their image as "America's Team."