PDF Summary:An Army at Dawn, by Rick Atkinson

An Army at Dawn by Rick Atkinson provides a gripping account of the Allied forces' North African campaign during World War II. The book details the complex planning and execution of Operation Torch, the 1942 amphibious invasion of French North Africa, and the initial clashes between American troops and unexpected French resistance.

The book examines the Allies' subsequent drive to capture Tunisia before Axis forces could solidify their presence. It covers pivotal battles like Sidi bou Zid and Kasserine Pass, which exposed American shortcomings but prompted valuable lessons in tactics, leadership, and logistics. Atkinson also portrays the unified Allied command taking shape amidst national rivalries and political complexities.

(continued)...

The clashes at Sidi bou Zid and Kasserine Pass revealed the shortcomings of the American armored forces and the superior tactics of the German panzer divisions, as well as highlighting the lack of effective cooperation among U.S. troops and the deficiencies in their leadership structure.

The author emphasizes a pair of battles that reveal the American military's strategic, armored, and command deficiencies, occurring in the final days of January and spilling over into February. The American M-3 Stuart light tanks' vulnerability to the superior German Mark III and IV Panzers became evident during the initial clash at Sidi bou Zid, especially as the Americans embarked on a direct and ill-considered assault across open terrain. Owing to its strong industrial foundation, the U.S. Army demonstrated greater resilience in restoring its depleted forces following the intense deadlock at Sidi bou Zid. The American troops suffered a decisive defeat in the battle at Kasserine Pass. Major General Lloyd R. Fredendall's leadership of II Corps was marked by a succession of misjudgments in strategy and tactics, such as overextending the American division along an expansive front, which precipitated a series of losses, hindered the timely engagement of his primary combat units, failed to ensure the defense of key positions, and resulted in a disorganized withdrawal that culminated in the forfeiture of tanks, artillery, and a significant amount of provisions.

Atkinson argues that the setback at Kasserine represents the largest territorial loss the United States has ever encountered in its military annals. The clash revealed deficiencies in the command hierarchy of the U.S. military, its strategic planning, and the morale of the soldiers, in addition to problems with their equipment. Several U.S. military commanders were identified for dismissal from their posts.

The evolving strategic context: transitioning from an emphasis on seizing Tunis to a more expansive strategy aimed at diminishing the adversary's strength and laying the groundwork for a springtime offensive.

The extended conflict to control the essential pathways along the Eastern Dorsal mountains highlighted the importance of securing key mountain passes.

The initiation of Operation SATIN required launching significant military actions amid Tunisia's harsh winter weather and devising strategic maneuvers for the approach to Gabès, a coastal town.

The deficiencies of the American soldiers became more evident, leading Eisenhower and his British colleagues to revise their initial plan of quickly capturing Tunis and Bizerte, opting instead for a strategy that involved confronting the enemy over a wider region, setting the stage for a collective offensive after the winter. Gaining control over the key routes through the mountainous Eastern Dorsal was crucial to the strategic initiative, as it provided a pathway to the plains that pave the way to Tunis and Bizerte; the intense battles for these critical points, particularly Longstop Hill and the heights near Medjez-el-Bab, underscored the difficulties in dislodging the entrenched Axis troops.

The commencement of Operation SATIN was designed to advance through the southern regions of Tunisia toward the coastal vicinity of Gabès, a strategic move to forestall any potential counteroffensives from Rommel and to establish a stronger position for the subsequent advance toward Tunis. The debacle at Kasserine Pass led to the discontinuation of the SATIN plan, as the harsh Tunisian winter compounded logistical and tactical challenges, impeding the establishment and support of a significant armed presence.

In the course of launching and sustaining their military campaigns, the Allies faced considerable challenges in logistics and organization within the theaters of North Africa.

Ensuring the logistics and support for the armed forces across vast areas was a monumental task, particularly given the persistent threat of enemy air attacks.

Atkinson elaborates on the considerable logistical challenges that the Allied forces faced, particularly during the early stages after the launch of Operation Torch. American forces persevered in the challenging endeavor of transporting supplies across extensive terrains, while still in the process of securing Tunis, and remained vigilant against the presence of hostile aircraft and naval units as they established their foothold in Algeria and Morocco. The French transportation infrastructure's shortcomings were especially burdensome because of a lack of trucks, decaying railway networks, and the challenges of traversing narrow mountain paths toward the Tunisian borders.

The scarcity of critical resources like tanks, trucks, and aviation fuel posed a considerable obstacle for the Allied forces, necessitating immediate actions to secure more supplies from the United States.

The planners had not anticipated the importance of winter attire, which, as the American forces endured higher losses and faced the harsh truths of contemporary warfare, resulted in a dire lack of vital gear including tanks, trucks, medical supplies, communication tools, and other indispensable items. The author underscores the critical need to address the shortfall in supplies and manage the growing logistical challenges, drawing attention to both the shortcomings in organization and acquisition, as well as the remarkable industrial might that the United States possessed.

The allied forces faced logistical coordination challenges that included synchronizing the resupply efforts between British and American divisions, catering to the needs of the French within an overburdened system, and navigating through the barriers posed by language and cultural disparities.

The author delves into the intricacies of coordinating logistics and launching a varied military force, which includes troops and materials from three separate nations, each with unique military traditions and autonomous structures for command and provisioning. The harmonization of measurement systems, including metric, imperial, and American standards, among the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, added complexity to the integration of administrative procedures. In addition to the logistical hurdles involving transport, storage, and managing supplies, a more significant obstacle was establishing a cohesive leadership framework adept at steering through the challenges posed by a contentious alliance.

During the winter stalemate, measures were taken to maintain the morale and discipline of the troops as they faced a difficult setting and morale-sapping postponements, addressing concerns like boredom and dwindling spirits, overseeing the effects of battle weariness, and handling the consequences of the Darlan deal.

Atkinson highlights several other obstacles encountered by the Allied forces' campaign, beyond those related to logistics. Soldiers stationed in North Africa endured a severe winter characterized by biting cold, relentless rain, and fierce winds, which was a significant contrast to the temperate days and mild nights they had expected. The prolonged stretch of tranquility at the battlefront, lasting from mid-December to February, sparked a mix of optimism and anxiety. During this pause in combat, leaders had the chance to reinforce their forces and improve logistics, but it also left the soldiers vulnerable to a loss of morale and boredom while they became aware of the successes of their counterparts in different battle zones. Simultaneously, the Darlan incident and the ensuing political jockeying within the French ranks, coupled with early indications of substantial casualties, sparked protests and resentment across the country, solidifying the belief among some in the US military that their leaders and policymakers preferred a practical strategy for winning rather than a noble way of fighting.

Simultaneously, the initial signs of extreme mental strain began to manifest in soldiers enduring prolonged combat, a condition that was once known as shell shock but had since been identified as combat exhaustion or battle fatigue. The repercussions would be just as crippling as physical wounds.

The Allied campaign greatly benefited from the vital intelligence provided by Ultra, which offered a deep understanding of the adversary's strengths and intentions, though this occasionally led to mistakes when the reliance was on decoded messages that were either incomplete or outdated.

Atkinson highlights the crucial impact of the North African triumph and subsequent military actions, crediting the success to the deciphering of adversary signals, a feat accomplished by British cryptanalysis. The Ultra intelligence often supplied the Allied forces with precise details about the locations, equipment shortages, and forthcoming intentions, as well as insights into the psychological condition of the Axis commanders. The data obtained through Ultra was occasionally restricted; on certain occasions, it was outdated or not comprehensive, resulting in incorrect assessments and suboptimal choices concerning the enemy's strength, capabilities, and strategic objectives.

In the North African campaign, the Allies observed the evolution of their strategic approaches, battlefield techniques, and military command.

Key military leaders including Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, and Montgomery emerged as proficient leaders, each displaying unique abilities and weaknesses, their capacity for growth, and the changing dynamics among the coalition's command structure.

Atkinson highlights the emergence of key military figures whose leadership skills, tactical acumen, strategic understanding, and unique personal qualities were instrumental in molding the operations in North Africa, which had a profound impact on the war's future course. In his first foray into combat leadership, Eisenhower made several mistakes, yet he demonstrated a remarkable capacity for enhancing his strategic and logistical understanding, while also nurturing and strengthening the unity within the Allied forces. As Patton emerged on the scene, ready to assume the role of viceroy in Morocco by the end of 1942 and then lead the American II Corps at the beginning of 1943, his distinctive audacity and style invigorated the American soldiers and the country, although his tendency for impulsive remarks and the annoyance he caused his superiors somewhat diminished this impact. Shortly before the final assault, Bradley assumed command of II Corps and quickly earned recognition for his calm tactical acumen and his deep comprehension from the perspective of a foot soldier. The contrasting ambitions and character traits of these three U.S. generals were the first embodiment of America's strategic approach to warfare in its debut on the African continent.

The ongoing endeavor to merge the armed forces of the United States, Britain, and France into a cohesive fighting unit necessitated the blending of different military command structures and the settling of disputes born from nationalistic rivalries.

The author emphasizes the continuous tensions between the Anglo-American allies, even though they spoke the same language and pursued shared goals. The United States was determined to step out from the overshadowing presence of their seasoned British counterparts, all the while maintaining the fragile coalition established for the wartime endeavor. The United Kingdom, though somewhat reluctantly, acknowledged that they needed to defer to the greater military might of the United States, while attempting to steer their occasionally impetuous junior partner.

The integration of French forces, whose commitment was questionable, into the command structure of the allied forces intensified these tensions; a significant number of these French troops were deeply troubled and provoked to strong resentment during their initial interactions with the Americans, casting doubt on their loyalty to the coalition's objectives. The task of merging diverse military forces from three nations along with additional colonial troops in Africa into a single effective fighting force presented significant difficulties, despite being under the command of the highly regarded leader Alexander.

The shift to a more methodical and thoughtful approach was emphasized by a growing recognition of the tactical proficiency of German troops, as well as the challenges posed by the terrain and logistical issues.

The early confidence in swiftly and decisively securing triumph in Africa diminished, leading to a strategic pivot that emphasized attrition and tactical positioning to disadvantage the adversary instead of seeking their complete annihilation. American military planners adjusted their strategic priorities due to an underestimation of the challenges presented by the terrain, supply chain complications, and unfavorable weather in Tunisia, along with a growing recognition of the Axis forces' resilience and the tactical prowess of the German troops.

The American forces honed their battlefield prowess by mastering the coordination between infantry maneuvers and artillery support, becoming adept at navigating the challenges of warfare in both rugged terrain and dry environments, and as the campaign progressed, they developed a relentless combat ethos.

Throughout the campaign, US troops encountered a variety of obstacles, yet they succeeded in substantially improving their combat proficiency and command skills, while also forging stronger ties of fellowship. The pivotal shift included a thorough grasp of modern combat strategies, involving the integration of foot soldiers with armored and artillery divisions in ways that were rarely achieved during stateside training drills. They also sharpened their skills to surmount the challenges posed by combat in rolling landscapes, abandoning many traditional tactical principles from earlier wars; similarly, their mastery in desert combat reached heights once thought impossible just a year prior.

The U.S. military personnel underwent a significant change when they realized they were involved in a deadly struggle against a resolute foe who was not deterred by their greater numbers and was always ready to fight with hostility. The soldiers underwent a significant transformation, developing a deep aversion.