PDF Summary:A Little History of Economics, by Niall Kishtainy

Have you ever wondered about the origins of economic thought? A Little History of Economics by Niall Kishtainy takes you on a journey through the evolution of economic ideas. From ancient Greek philosophers who explored society's economic frameworks, to medieval thinkers who debated the morality of commerce, this book traces how economic philosophies took shape.

It examines the emergence of capitalism and classical economic theories, delving into the influential ideas of Adam Smith and David Ricardo. The book also covers Keynesian economics, monetarism, and public choice theory—providing insights into economic models and the role of government intervention.

(continued)...

Marx argued that the excess value generated by laborers was unjustly appropriated by capitalists.

Marx analyzed the idea that the true worth of a product is determined by the amount of labor that goes into producing it. Workers are compensated merely with what is necessary for their survival, and the surplus value they generate is inequitably claimed by business owners as profit.

Marx predicted that the intensifying struggle between different social strata would ultimately lead to the downfall of the capitalist system.

Marx forecasted that the escalating struggle between social classes would culminate in the collapse of the capitalist system, paving the way for a radical revolution by the masses that would culminate in the creation of a communist state. Marx was of the opinion that such a significant change would terminate exploitative methods and result in collective ownership.

The growing disapproval of the capitalist structure led to increased backing for alternative economic models like socialism, which promotes communal ownership of resources as opposed to personal ownership, even though Marx viewed some socialist concepts as overly simplistic relative to his own more comprehensive ideas. The forecasts made by Marx have had a profound influence on capitalism, swaying a wide range of proponents and detractors throughout history.

The development of modern economic theory

The author navigates the evolution of economic thought, showing the impact of various theories such as Keynesianism, Monetarism, and Rational Expectations on modern views regarding government revenue and expenditure decisions.

Keynesian economics challenged the classical view that markets automatically maintain full employment

Keynes suggested that by manipulating the circulation of currency and boosting government spending, economic demand would be invigorated, thus reducing unemployment.

Keynes championed an economic philosophy that diverged from the traditional confidence in markets' inherent ability to stabilize themselves. Keynes championed the idea that the government should proactively employ fiscal strategies and modify monetary regulations to stimulate demand and diminish unemployment. The importance of this idea increased when traditional approaches began to fail during the economic downturn known as the Great Depression.

The concept known as the Phillips curve encapsulates the use of Keynesian tactics to regulate inflation and unemployment levels.

The 'Phillips curve' is the term used to describe the observed correlation between inflation and unemployment that underpinned Keynesian approaches. Decision-makers received a strategy for evaluating economic priorities that could potentially lead to higher inflation in the pursuit of lowering unemployment rates.

Monetarists like Friedman shifted the emphasis away from Keynesian strategies, underscoring that the main economic challenge was inflation.

Friedman argued that activist government policies were ineffective and would just fuel inflation

Contrary to Keynes' perspective, Monetarists like Milton Friedman emphasized the drawbacks of active government intervention, particularly inflation. They contended that controlling inflation should take precedence over reducing unemployment, indicating a departure from Keynesian principles by deliberately and methodically controlling the supply of money.

Proponents of the belief that individuals hold rational expectations were convinced that they would anticipate and neutralize any government attempts to boost employment.

The Rational Expectations theory suggested that people would alter their actions in foresight of governmental measures, thus counteracting initiatives designed to reduce unemployment levels. Doubts about Keynesian interventions reinforced the belief that giving precedence to keeping inflation low represents the most prudent strategy.

The writer guides us through the evolution of economic thought, scrutinizing the fundamental principles and the tangible impacts and assessments that have shaped our current understanding and choices within the realm of economic study.

The importance of state intervention in the frameworks of economic models.

The text explores a range of opinions on the role of government in economic issues, emphasizing the insights of notable intellectuals like Hayek and Buchanan, who challenged the prevailing opinions about the scope of government activities.

Hayek warned that increasing government power might endanger individual liberties and could ultimately lead to a dictatorial government.

Hayek argued that centralized economic planning was incompatible with a free society and championed the independence of market forces. In his view, the extent of state involvement in the United Kingdom and the United States was more similar to that of the Nazi regime than they might like to admit. If the government increases its involvement in economic matters, it might set the stage for a scenario in which every facet of existence is regulated, potentially leading to the emergence of a totalitarian state. Hayek cautioned that escalating state interference might endanger personal freedoms and possibly pave the way for totalitarian rule.

Hayek rejected the notion that a hybrid system combining capitalist and socialist features could serve as a viable intermediary. He argued that personal freedom is compromised by governmental economic intervention, as it is impossible for a single policy to cater to the varied desires of every person. Hayek held the view that when governments intervene more in markets with the intention of accelerating economic growth, this could jeopardize the liberties of individuals. Despite acknowledging the necessity for some governmental spending in areas like unemployment assistance and communal services, he harbored concerns that excessive state intervention might undermine freedom.

Proponents of public choice theory, such as Buchanan, contend that individuals in political and bureaucratic positions are motivated by their own interests rather than by a selfless desire to create public benefit.

James Buchanan proposed that politicians and bureaucrats frequently act based on their own personal gain instead of formulating policies that benefit the public at large. Buchanan, a Nobel Laureate in economics, compared the actions of government officials to those of corporations, which typically aim to maximize profits.

He contended that the growth of government was chiefly propelled by the personal ambitions of politicians and bureaucrats, rather than by an aspiration to improve the functioning of markets. Officials frequently place a higher value on maintaining their political power than on the noble goal of promoting the common good. Buchanan noted that the usual goal of politicians is to maintain their authority, often by generating advantages to garner backing and potentially monetary benefits from specific interest factions. According to public choice theory, government actions are often flawed because they do not always act in the general public's interest.

James Buchanan highlighted how businesses often influence government choices to benefit themselves, a situation that may result in fewer choices and higher expenses for consumers. Imposing tariffs on imported cars to benefit local producers exemplifies how certain groups can influence governmental decisions in ways that may harm the overall market, a practice referred to as the pursuit of economic gain through manipulation or exploitation of the public policy or regulatory environment.

Critics of public choice theory argue that its advocates overstate their case, noting that the expansion of government is largely due to vital improvements in sectors like public health and education, which are fundamental to the development of advanced economic systems. Moreover, these critics argue that individuals can be driven by a sympathetic awareness of the different difficulties that arise due to their unique social standings, implying that politicians too might base their choices on considerations beyond their own self-interest.

Investigations into previously uncharted domains within the field of economics.

This article explores the progression of economic thought, advancing beyond traditional concepts and examining the limits of our knowledge in the field of economics.

Specialists in the field of information economics have shown that when there is an asymmetry of information, it can lead to inefficiencies in the functioning of market systems.

Akerlof's work sheds light on how hidden information can distort the used car market, a phenomenon he termed the "lemons problem."

In 1970, George Akerlof garnered acclaim for his study, known as 'The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,' which concentrated on the difficulties involved in purchasing a dependable second-hand vehicle. The difficulty stems from the seller having a more profound understanding of the vehicle's condition, which may encompass knowledge of defects that the purchaser may not be aware of. Because of the disparity in information, individuals with well-maintained cars may opt not to part with their superior vehicles at standard prices that fail to acknowledge the disparity in upkeep, potentially leading to their undervaluation or nonexistence in the marketplace. The dominance of inferior vehicles in the market may arise when consumers, despite their willingness to pay a premium, struggle with evaluating a car's quality.

Stiglitz examined the impact of information disparities on market operations.

Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz has voiced concerns about the tendency of free market advocates to disregard the dangers that arise from the uneven distribution of information, particularly in the financial sector. When lenders lack information about their borrowers in developing countries, for example, the results can be disastrous. Information asymmetries can result in a decrease in lending or the distribution of riskier loans at higher rates, potentially leading to default by the borrowers. Stiglitz underscores the challenge of effectively managing complex information in financial markets to assess the creditworthiness of applicants and the viability of their proposed projects.

Behavioral economists have challenged the idea that individuals in the economy invariably behave with flawless logic.

The investigations conducted by Kahneman and Tversky revealed consistent errors in the way humans make decisions.

The discipline of behavioral economics, which investigates the often flawed and pragmatic methods humans employ in decision-making, was initiated by scholars including Amos Tversky. Their research revealed systematic biases, such as loss aversion, wherein people experience greater psychological pain from losses than pleasure from equivalent gains. Their research also showed that people often make mistakes when assessing the likelihood of events, tending to overvalue the chances of particular, intricate situations as opposed to those that are more broadly likely.

Some have explored how psychological factors influence economic behaviors.

Richard Thaler conducted research into the influence of psychological elements on the choices people make in economics, in collaboration with Kahneman and Tversky. They discovered that possession can amplify an object's value, occasionally to an irrational degree, akin to the intense attachment a young child might develop with a mere stick. This endowment effect, along with framing effects that manipulate perceptions based on how choices are presented, underscore the complexity and irrationality of human decision-making. Thaler observed that supermarkets exploit these inclinations by initially setting elevated prices before presenting offers that suggest significant savings, even if the actual discounts are minimal.

The emerging economic paths suggest that the results of market activities are shaped by more than just the fundamental principles of supply and demand; they also involve the intricacies of human behavior and the uneven distribution of knowledge.