What is firm-foundation theory? How is it different from castle-in-the-air theory? How do they differ and which is the best stock valuation method? <\/p>\n\n\n\n
There are two primary stock valuation methods. Firm-foundation theory states that assets have an “intrinsic value” based on the value of current dividends and estimated potential in the future. The idea here is that the stock will always regress to the intrinsic value. The castle-in-the-air theory has a different approach, stating that a stock is worth what people are prepared to pay for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Keep reading for an in-depth look at firm-foundation theory and castle-in-the-air theory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Before a novice investor can begin to make the right decisions about how to invest her money, she must know how stocks are valued<\/em>. Traditionally, there are two primary theories of asset valuation: the firm-foundation theory<\/strong> and castle-in-the-air theory<\/strong>. (There\u2019s a third\u2014called \u201cthe new investment technology\u201d\u2014that Malkiel describes later in the book.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Both theories, as we\u2019ll see, are flawed, and Malkiel is skeptical of them both as a reliable source of returns (though, in the short run, either may produce better-than-market-average returns).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Adherents of the firm-foundation theory argue that assets have an \u201cintrinsic value\u201d based on their present conditions and future potential. <\/strong>For example, if the asset being valued is a common stock, the firm-foundation theorist will calculate the stock\u2019s intrinsic value by summing (1) the value of its present dividends and (2) the estimated growth of its dividends in the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Once an intrinsic value is established, the investor will make buying and selling decisions based on the difference between the actual price of the stock and the intrinsic value (because, according to the theory, the price will eventually regress to the intrinsic value<\/strong>). If the stock price is below <\/em>the intrinsic value, the investor will buy more shares; if it\u2019s above, she\u2019ll sell.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Given its simplicity and logic, the firm-foundation theory has earned its share of proponents, among them Warren Buffett, one of the most successful investors of all time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, a major problem with the firm-foundation theory is its reliance on future estimates<\/em>. No analyst can know for certain how much or how long a stock\u2019s dividends will grow<\/strong>\u2014or even if they\u2019ll grow at all. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Most closely associated with economist John Maynard Keynes, the castle-in-the-air theory of asset valuation states that an asset is only worth what someone else will pay for it<\/strong>. In other words, no asset has an \u201cintrinsic value\u201d that can be determined analytically or mathematically; rather, the value of an asset is purely psychological<\/strong>\u2014it\u2019s worth whatever the majority of investors think <\/em>it\u2019s worth. (The theory earns its name because investors will build \u201ccastles in the air\u201d about certain assets, thereby juicing their value.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Keynes\u2019s understanding of the castle-in-the-air theory made him a fortune. His process was as follows: Because no one can know with any certainty the future revenues or dividends of a given stock, he invested based on what he thought <\/strong>other investors <\/em><\/strong>would value<\/strong>. For example, if he sensed there was prevailing optimism in a certain sector of the economy, say in steel production, he would invest in steel companies regardless of their underlying fundamentals, simply because he anticipated other investors would soon rush into steel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The key to the castle-in-the-air theory is <\/strong>timing<\/em><\/strong>: The successful investor will buy an asset just before <\/em>mass enthusiasm causes its price to rise and sell before that enthusiasm wanes. A less charitable name for the castle-in-the-air theory is the \u201cgreater fool\u201d theory\u2014the less attuned an investor is to the prevailing winds, the more likely she\u2019ll end up owning a stock that\u2019s worth far less than she paid for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Consider the basic stock valuation methods\u2014and valuations run amok\u2014in light of your goals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What is firm-foundation theory? How is it different from castle-in-the-air theory? How do they differ and which is the best stock valuation method? There are two primary stock valuation methods. Firm-foundation theory states that assets have an “intrinsic value” based on the value of current dividends and estimated potential in the future. The idea here is that the stock will always regress to the intrinsic value. The castle-in-the-air theory has a different approach, stating that a stock is worth what people are prepared to pay for it. Keep reading for an in-depth look at firm-foundation theory and castle-in-the-air theory.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":29079,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[81,31],"tags":[469],"class_list":["post-46680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economics","category-money","tag-a-random-walk-down-wall-street","","tg-column-two"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Firm-Foundation Theory<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The Castle-in-the-Air Theory<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Exercise: Examine Stock Valuation Methods<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n