{"id":25302,"date":"2021-01-31T09:29:25","date_gmt":"2021-01-31T13:29:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?p=25302"},"modified":"2021-06-13T18:44:00","modified_gmt":"2021-06-13T22:44:00","slug":"scientific-paradigms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/","title":{"rendered":"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

What are scientific paradigms? What functions do they serve and how do they get established?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scientific paradigms are the overarching frameworks within a scientific discipline that determine what constitutes legitimate contributions to the field. In that sense, paradigms dictate the problems to be solved and provide the tools with which to solve those problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read on to learn about scientific paradigms, how they get established, and what role they play in the development of science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

What Are Scientific Paradigms?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Without scientific paradigms, it\u2019s hard to know which facts are the most important. <\/strong>Scientists working without a paradigm will tend to gather whatever facts are easiest for them to find, or most relevant to their other areas of knowledge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because of this lack of a singular focus<\/a> or guide, historians tracing a particular field of study back through time would likely find that, before there were common scientific paradigms, each scientist had to recreate the field almost from scratch.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Example: The Study of Light, With and Without Paradigms<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For an example of this pattern, let\u2019s look at the history of optics, the study of light. We see a series of scientific revolutions and changing scientific paradigms going back to the 17th century: Modern studies of light are based on the belief that light is made of photons, which have characteristics of both particles and waves. However, before that model was developed in the early 20th century, most physics books taught that light was a wave. If we go back even further, scientists believed light was made of particles and looked for evidence that it puts pressure on solid objects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, before the 17th century, there were many competing schools of thought and no one universally-accepted paradigm. There were so many different schools of thought about light because, at the time, there were no common beliefs or understandings that they could take for granted. <\/strong> Due to the biases and past experiences each scientist brought, they came to wildly different\u2014but equally valid\u2014conclusions. Each school of thought supported itself by pointing to certain observations about the world that it could explain better than the others. Those observations were that school\u2019s paradigms. These different schools all made significant discoveries that helped Newton to create the first almost-universally accepted model of light in the 17th century. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rules of Scientific Paradigms<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

While historians can generally find the paradigms of a given community fairly easily, finding the specific rules that community followed is often much harder. For one thing, scientists may follow the same paradigm, but disagree on how to interpret it. Also, like professionals in any field, scientists have experience and knowledge that they either don\u2019t communicate clearly or don\u2019t realize others lack. Therefore, historians sometimes don\u2019t recognize or understand the rules of the time because they\u2019re couched in unfamiliar terms and assumptions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, just because there is a paradigm doesn\u2019t mean that there is necessarily a set of rules to go with it. Sometimes historians are looking for something that simply isn\u2019t there. However, e<\/strong>ven when paradigms lack specific rules, they can still restrict the scientific field by guiding the work.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To illustrate this point, consider a question asked by the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. He wondered how we know to apply terms like \u201cchair,\u201d or \u201cgame,\u201d to something we\u2019ve never seen before. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The brief version of the answer is that we apply those terms to things that resemble other things we know by those names. For example, if something has legs and a seat and a back, then we\u2019ll probably call it a chair because it looks a lot like other chairs. This holds true even if it\u2019s a type of chair we\u2019ve never seen before.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Applying Wittgenstein\u2019s idea to science, scientists following the same paradigm will end up using the same (or similar) terms and methods in their work. Just like we can clearly identify a chair despite there being no concrete laws of \u201cchair-ness,\u201d we can identify a single paradigm by similarities in research methods and the language they use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are several reasons to believe that paradigms guide work even when no fixed rules are in place. <\/strong>First, there\u2019s the difficulty of finding concrete rules in some communities, which we\u2019ve already discussed. Second, scientists aren\u2019t given lists of rules and theories to memorize\u2014they pick them up naturally through study and learning how to apply them in practice. In other words, even when such rules exist, they aren\u2019t formalized. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Third, as long as there is a universally-accepted paradigm\u2014or close enough to one\u2014normal science doesn\u2019t need <\/em>established rules. The scientists all agree on the problems and solutions that their field has, so they\u2019ll naturally work in the same or similar ways, as was demonstrated in the analogy to Wittgenstein’s question. However, the other side of this coin is that normal science<\/a> does <\/em>need concrete rules when a paradigm is unstable; in other words, just before and during a scientific revolution<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, normal science\u2014even within the same field\u2014isn\u2019t completely uniform. There could be any number of specialties and subspecialties that, to an outsider, seem to fall under the umbrella of one particular field. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sometimes a scientific revolution can actually be very small, affecting only a particular specialty within a field. Therefore, there can\u2019t be scientific rules that affect the entire field, when paradigms can change for subsets of that field.<\/strong> The next section will go into detail about subsets within fields and how paradigms can affect them differently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anomalies and Discoveries<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Normal science doesn\u2019t look for anomalies or unexplained phenomena, but it often finds them anyway; in fact, science seems to be uniquely good at finding unexpected things. In order to mesh those apparently contradictory facts, we have to assume that working within a paradigm is an effective way to change that paradigm. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Working by a particular set of rules, then finding facts or theories that don\u2019t fit those rules, requires that the rules then be changed. Far from unusual or contradictory, this may actually be an inevitable result of digging ever-deeper into a particular paradigm, trying to expand and clarify each tiny facet of it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are two key ways a paradigm can be changed: discovering new facts and inventing new theories.<\/strong> However, the two processes are closely related, and both follow the same pattern.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Discovering New Facts and Inventing New Theories<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

New discoveries start with <\/strong>anomalies<\/em><\/strong>. <\/strong>When an observation doesn\u2019t match the expectations set by the current paradigm, there is an anomaly; in that sense, a paradigm is actually needed for new discoveries. You must know what to expect before you can recognize that something\u2019s wrong. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, anomalies don\u2019t always lead to new discoveries\u2014as we\u2019ve said before, sometimes they\u2019re ignored or brushed aside as mistakes, edge cases, or something too inconvenient to deal with. It usually takes some time for scientists to recognize and acknowledge that the anomaly is important, and must be addressed. Sometimes that never happens at all. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

After finally being acknowledged, the anomaly is investigated. Assuming that the anomaly is natural, and not the result of human error, a change in paradigm is needed to account for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This process ends when the paradigm has changed so that the anomalous event is now expected. <\/strong>This is more difficult than it sounds. At this point scientists aren\u2019t just adding new knowledge, they\u2019re rejecting old knowledge, and many of their colleagues will resist the change. That resistance to change<\/a> is part of why discovery and paradigm changes are such drawn-out processes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A psychological experiment helped to demonstrate this effect. In the experiment, subjects were shown a series of playing cards. However, some of the cards were altered, such as a black four of hearts. Subjects identified the familiar cards easily, but hesitated with the ones that were outside their normal experience of playing cards\u2014that is to say, the anomalies. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some subjects even became upset by the anomalous cards; they started doubting what they were seeing or how they were interpreting it rather than realizing that it was simply an altered card. Others would incorrectly identify the black four of hearts as either a normal four of hearts, or the four of spades. They immediately and without thinking tried to fit it into their current paradigm of playing cards. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, when shown the cards a second time, most subjects were able to recognize what had happened and correctly identify all of the cards, including the anomalies. This is a parallel to scientists recognizing that they had not made a mistake, and that their paradigm needs to be adjusted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Joseph Priestley collected a sample of oxygen-enriched air, but not pure oxygen. He tried to claim that he had discovered the element, but if bottling impure air is enough to take the credit, then he was hardly the first to do so. Plus, it was several years before Priestley even understood what he had bottled; at first he thought it was nitrous oxide, a type of gas that scientists already knew about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Antoine Lavoisier was the first to collect and correctly identify a sample of pure oxygen, and so he is the one usually credited with discovering it. Some scientists even argue against this <\/em>claim, since Lavoisier didn\u2019t fully understand how oxygen gas was made. However, the paradigms that led Lavoisier to incorrectly identify how oxygen was produced weren\u2019t rejected until almost a century later, and by that point oxygen itself was firmly entrenched in chemistry. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So you see how it can be difficult to pinpoint what should be a straightforward answer. In fact, the deeper you look into the history of oxygen gas, the less <\/em>clear it becomes who deserves the credit for discovering it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What are scientific paradigms? What functions do they serve and how do they get established? Scientific paradigms are the overarching frameworks within a scientific discipline that determine what constitutes legitimate contributions to the field. In that sense, paradigms dictate the problems to be solved and provide the tools with which to solve those problems. Read on to learn about scientific paradigms, how they get established, and what role they play in the development of science.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":11754,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[160,24],"tags":[198],"class_list":["post-25302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science","category-society","tag-the-structure-of-scientific-revolutions","","tg-column-two"],"yoast_head":"\nScientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them? - Shortform Books<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Scientific paradigms are the high-level frameworks within a discipline that determine what is a legitimate contribution to the field.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Scientific paradigms are the high-level frameworks within a discipline that determine what is a legitimate contribution to the field.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Shortform Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-31T13:29:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-06-13T22:44:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/wordpress.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"905\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"580\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Darya Sinusoid\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Darya Sinusoid\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Darya Sinusoid\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0421cce75bc249b11e2517b3a91f9c46\"},\"headline\":\"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them?\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-31T13:29:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-13T22:44:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/\"},\"wordCount\":1665,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"The Structure of Scientific Revolutions\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Science\",\"Society\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/\",\"name\":\"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them? - Shortform Books\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-31T13:29:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-06-13T22:44:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"Scientific paradigms are the high-level frameworks within a discipline that determine what is a legitimate contribution to the field.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg\",\"width\":905,\"height\":580},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Shortform Books\",\"description\":\"The World's Best Book Summaries\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Shortform Books\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":74,\"caption\":\"Shortform Books\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0421cce75bc249b11e2517b3a91f9c46\",\"name\":\"Darya Sinusoid\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Untitled-design-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Untitled-design-1.png\",\"caption\":\"Darya Sinusoid\"},\"description\":\"Darya\u2019s love for reading started with fantasy novels (The LOTR trilogy is still her all-time-favorite). Growing up, however, she found herself transitioning to non-fiction, psychological, and self-help books. She has a degree in Psychology and a deep passion for the subject. She likes reading research-informed books that distill the workings of the human brain\/mind\/consciousness and thinking of ways to apply the insights to her own life. Some of her favorites include Thinking, Fast and Slow, How We Decide, and The Wisdom of the Enneagram.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/author\/darya\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them? - Shortform Books","description":"Scientific paradigms are the high-level frameworks within a discipline that determine what is a legitimate contribution to the field.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them?","og_description":"Scientific paradigms are the high-level frameworks within a discipline that determine what is a legitimate contribution to the field.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/","og_site_name":"Shortform Books","article_published_time":"2021-01-31T13:29:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-06-13T22:44:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":905,"height":580,"url":"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/wordpress.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Darya Sinusoid","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Darya Sinusoid","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/"},"author":{"name":"Darya Sinusoid","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0421cce75bc249b11e2517b3a91f9c46"},"headline":"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them?","datePublished":"2021-01-31T13:29:25+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-13T22:44:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/"},"wordCount":1665,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg","keywords":["The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"],"articleSection":["Science","Society"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/","name":"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them? - Shortform Books","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg","datePublished":"2021-01-31T13:29:25+00:00","dateModified":"2021-06-13T22:44:00+00:00","description":"Scientific paradigms are the high-level frameworks within a discipline that determine what is a legitimate contribution to the field.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg","width":905,"height":580},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/scientific-paradigms\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Scientific Paradigms: Why Do We Need Them?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/","name":"Shortform Books","description":"The World's Best Book Summaries","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Shortform Books","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png","width":500,"height":74,"caption":"Shortform Books"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/0421cce75bc249b11e2517b3a91f9c46","name":"Darya Sinusoid","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Untitled-design-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Untitled-design-1.png","caption":"Darya Sinusoid"},"description":"Darya\u2019s love for reading started with fantasy novels (The LOTR trilogy is still her all-time-favorite). Growing up, however, she found herself transitioning to non-fiction, psychological, and self-help books. She has a degree in Psychology and a deep passion for the subject. She likes reading research-informed books that distill the workings of the human brain\/mind\/consciousness and thinking of ways to apply the insights to her own life. Some of her favorites include Thinking, Fast and Slow, How We Decide, and The Wisdom of the Enneagram.","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/author\/darya\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/the-immortal-life-of-henrietta-lacks-gey.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25302"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38659,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25302\/revisions\/38659"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11754"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}