{"id":23413,"date":"2021-01-05T20:25:00","date_gmt":"2021-01-06T00:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?p=23413"},"modified":"2021-01-15T17:38:53","modified_gmt":"2021-01-15T21:38:53","slug":"robert-axelrod","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/","title":{"rendered":"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner’s Dilemma Simulation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Who is Robert Axelrod? How does his simulation of the Prisoner’s dilemma explain survival tactics in nature?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert Axelrod created a tournament in which programmers designed a program to respond to the Prisoner’s Dilemma. The lessons learned showed how species might balance cooperation and competition to reach an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read more about Robert Axelrod and the application of the Prisoner’s Dilemma to evolution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Overview of the Prisoner’s Dilemma<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Prisoner\u2019s Dilemma is a logistical riddle closely tied to game theory. <\/strong>In the Prisoner\u2019s Dilemma there are two players, each with two options: Cooperate and Betray. Neither player knows which option the other has chosen, and they are not allowed to influence the other\u2019s choice in any way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If both players choose Cooperate, they each get a significant payout\u2014but a smaller one than in the next situation. If one player Cooperates and the other Betrays, the betrayer gets a large payout while the cooperative player suffers a large penalty. If both players Betray, they each suffer a small penalty. Cooperation and betrayal are altruistic and selfish actions, respectively. Therefore, everything we know about the Dilemma could be compared to nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In any single instance of the game, the logical choice is to simply pick Betray. <\/strong>If your opponent chose Cooperate, you\u2019ll get a larger payout than if you\u2019d also chosen Cooperate. If your opponent chose Betray, you\u2019ll suffer a smaller penalty than if you\u2019d chosen Cooperate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the strategy becomes much more complex if you play over and over again.<\/strong> Now one Always-Betray strategy can get stuck in a penalizing loop with another one, while more cooperative strategies have the chance to reap mutual benefits. Of course, an Always-Cooperate strategy will still lose every time to an Always-Betray strategy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert Axelrod: Prisoner’s Dilemma Tournament<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Professor Robert Axelrod once invited programmers to create programs that use Prisoner\u2019s Dilemma strategies, which he then entered into a virtual \u201ctournament.\u201d In this tournament, each program played 200 rounds of Prisoner\u2019s Dilemma with each of the others, including a copy of itself. Whichever program had the highest total score at the end was the winner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There were a number of complex strategies submitted for this tournament, some of which were quite cutthroat. However, the surprising winner of the tournament was a simple program called Tit for Tat. This program always played Cooperate on the first round, then for each round after that it simply copied what its opponent had done last. This made it so cooperative strategies were rewarded, while aggressive strategies were punished. Afterward, Axelrod calculated that a so-called \u201cTit for Two Tats\u201d program would have done even better; such a program wouldn\u2019t Betray until having been betrayed twice in a row itself, and would therefore have avoided some penalizing loops that Tit for Tat got caught in. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Out of 15 programs submitted, eight of them were programmed to never Betray first, and those eight \u201cnice\u201d programs had the highest scores. The aggressive strategies all scored significantly lower than their cooperative counterparts. The weakest of the top eight was an \u201cunforgiving\u201d program, which played Cooperate until the first time it was betrayed, and then played Betray every round after. This meant that it couldn\u2019t break out of penalizing loops the way the other cooperative programs could. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Professor Robert Axelrod held a second tournament after announcing the results of the first. Many programmers submitted \u201cnice\u201d programs for this second contest, reasoning that cooperation must be a winning strategy since it had done so well the last time. One entrant was the theorized Tit for Two Tats that would have won the previous tournament. Others tried submitting more aggressive, cutthroat strategies, hoping to take advantage of the cooperative field. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Once again, Tit for Tat had the highest score, beating even the Tit for Two Tats program that would have won the first tournament. The fact that Tit for Two Tats did not do as well in this tournament as it would have in the last one demonstrates an important point: The best strategy depends on what others around you are doing.<\/strong> Similarly, while Tit for Tat does well against a wide range of opponents in a diverse field, it would not succeed if the field were too <\/em>aggressive, because its first Cooperate play would put it at an immediate disadvantage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert Axelrod held a third tournament using the same programs from the second. However, this time he tried to mimic biology by paying winners not in points, but in \u201coffspring\u201d who would go on to the next round. After around 1,000 \u201cgenerations,\u201d the proportions of offspring stopped shifting in any meaningful way. That is to say, the field had reached its Evolutionarily Stable Strategy.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert Axelrod ran this simulation six times. Tit for Tat was the most successful in five of them, with similar cooperative-but-retaliatory programs also doing quite well. Aggressive programs tended to do well at first, but decline and die out as they drove their \u201cprey\u201d to \u201cextinction.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, Tit for Tat alone\u2014or any program that never Betrays first\u2014can\u2019t be considered a true ESS.<\/strong> Such a population could be infiltrated by a mutant program that never <\/em>picks Betray. As long as there are no aggressive programs in the field, that new program can spread. That would leave the entire population vulnerable if an aggressive program were later introduced. Axelrod coined the term \u201cCollectively Stable Strategy\u201d to describe this situation (remember that an ESS cannot <\/em>be invaded by another strategy).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finding Stability<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

We could consider Axelrod\u2019s system to have two stable points. One is the Tit for Tat dominance (or similar cooperative-but-retaliatory strategies) we saw. The other is Always-Betray dominance\u2014in a field dominated by Always-Betray programs, no other program could do better because no strategy can beat Always-Betray in a head-to-head match.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which stable point the system goes to depends on which programs are present at the start, and what\u2014in a computer simulation\u2014could be called chance. <\/strong>However, if we shift to thinking about nature, we can come up with better explanations than pure luck.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In nature, most animals tend to cluster together with others of their kind\u2014not only because of the advantages of doing so, but also because most organisms don\u2019t stray very far from where they were born. This is called viscosity<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tit for Tat does best when surrounded by similar strategies. On the other hand, Always-Betray does particularly badly when surrounded by other aggressive strategies, as they get locked into penalizing loops. Therefore, a cluster of Tit for Tat will prosper, while a cluster of Always-Betray will suffer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While it will be difficult for another strategy to invade a population of Always-Betray individuals, it\u2019s almost inevitable that it will happen eventually. <\/strong>A population of creatures with the Always-Betray strategy will continually weaken itself, while a population of more cooperative individuals will prosper and spread. Sooner or later the balance will tip back toward the cooperative population.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Therefore, while Always-Betray is technically an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (in the sense that no other program could do better in a population of Always-Betray), and Tit for Tat is technically not an ESS (because it could be invaded by a mutant program and eventually overthrown), it could be said that Tit for Tat has a long-term stability that Always-Betray lacks.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aggressive strategies have a quality that Tit for Tat lacks, which may explain this difference. This quality could be called envy, or perhaps competitiveness. The key difference is that Tit for Tat is not concerned with \u201cbeating\u201d its opponent\u2014in fact, it can\u2019t possibly get a higher score than its opponent, since it will never Betray unless it\u2019s betrayed first. Tit for Tat\u2019s only concern is for scoring points, not for scoring more<\/em> than anyone else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aggressive strategies, on the other hand, seek to \u201cwin\u201d their matches by beating down their opponents. This is why, when a field is dominated by aggressive programs, they inevitably suffer for it. The mistake aggressive strategies make is treating Prisoner\u2019s Dilemma like a zero sum game<\/em>: a game in which one player\u2019s win must be another player\u2019s loss, such as chess. However, in Prisoner\u2019s Dilemma\u2014and, arguably, in nature\u2014both players can do quite well if they\u2019re not concerned about \u201cwinning.\u201d This is the very nature of reciprocal altruism<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Who is Robert Axelrod? How does his simulation of the Prisoner’s dilemma explain survival tactics in nature? Robert Axelrod created a tournament in which programmers designed a program to respond to the Prisoner’s Dilemma. The lessons learned showed how species might balance cooperation and competition to reach an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy. Read more about Robert Axelrod and the application of the Prisoner’s Dilemma to evolution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":20556,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,160,24],"tags":[187],"class_list":["post-23413","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-psychology","category-science","category-society","tag-the-selfish-gene","","tg-column-two"],"yoast_head":"\nRobert Axelrod: The Prisoner's Dilemma Simulation - Shortform Books<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"What is the best option for survival and evolution\u2014cooperation or competition? Robert Axelrod finds out in a Prisoner's Dilemma tournament.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner's Dilemma Simulation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"What is the best option for survival and evolution\u2014cooperation or competition? Robert Axelrod finds out in a Prisoner's Dilemma tournament.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Shortform Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-01-06T00:25:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-15T21:38:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/wordpress.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1220\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rina Shah\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rina Shah\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Rina Shah\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d07435826f13a8f422d5d333dceac287\"},\"headline\":\"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner’s Dilemma Simulation\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-06T00:25:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-15T21:38:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/\"},\"wordCount\":1417,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"The Selfish Gene\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Psychology\",\"Science\",\"Society\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/\",\"name\":\"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner's Dilemma Simulation - Shortform Books\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-01-06T00:25:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-15T21:38:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"What is the best option for survival and evolution\u2014cooperation or competition? Robert Axelrod finds out in a Prisoner's Dilemma tournament.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg\",\"width\":1220,\"height\":650},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner’s Dilemma Simulation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Shortform Books\",\"description\":\"The World's Best Book Summaries\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Shortform Books\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":74,\"caption\":\"Shortform Books\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d07435826f13a8f422d5d333dceac287\",\"name\":\"Rina Shah\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/560b3bc3d51625f9becff4fded992607b156f274aa36bc07f8a4285a1d72cdc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/560b3bc3d51625f9becff4fded992607b156f274aa36bc07f8a4285a1d72cdc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rina Shah\"},\"description\":\"An avid reader for as long as she can remember, Rina\u2019s love for books began with The Boxcar Children. Her penchant for always having a book nearby has never faded, though her reading tastes have since evolved. Rina reads around 100 books every year, with a fairly even split between fiction and non-fiction. Her favorite genres are memoirs, public health, and locked room mysteries. As an attorney, Rina can\u2019t help analyzing and deconstructing arguments in any book she reads.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/author\/rina\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner's Dilemma Simulation - Shortform Books","description":"What is the best option for survival and evolution\u2014cooperation or competition? Robert Axelrod finds out in a Prisoner's Dilemma tournament.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner's Dilemma Simulation","og_description":"What is the best option for survival and evolution\u2014cooperation or competition? Robert Axelrod finds out in a Prisoner's Dilemma tournament.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/","og_site_name":"Shortform Books","article_published_time":"2021-01-06T00:25:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-15T21:38:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1220,"height":650,"url":"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/wordpress.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Rina Shah","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rina Shah","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/"},"author":{"name":"Rina Shah","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d07435826f13a8f422d5d333dceac287"},"headline":"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner’s Dilemma Simulation","datePublished":"2021-01-06T00:25:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-15T21:38:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/"},"wordCount":1417,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg","keywords":["The Selfish Gene"],"articleSection":["Psychology","Science","Society"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/","name":"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner's Dilemma Simulation - Shortform Books","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg","datePublished":"2021-01-06T00:25:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-15T21:38:53+00:00","description":"What is the best option for survival and evolution\u2014cooperation or competition? Robert Axelrod finds out in a Prisoner's Dilemma tournament.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg","width":1220,"height":650},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/robert-axelrod\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Robert Axelrod: The Prisoner’s Dilemma Simulation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/","name":"Shortform Books","description":"The World's Best Book Summaries","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Shortform Books","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png","width":500,"height":74,"caption":"Shortform Books"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d07435826f13a8f422d5d333dceac287","name":"Rina Shah","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/560b3bc3d51625f9becff4fded992607b156f274aa36bc07f8a4285a1d72cdc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/560b3bc3d51625f9becff4fded992607b156f274aa36bc07f8a4285a1d72cdc8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rina Shah"},"description":"An avid reader for as long as she can remember, Rina\u2019s love for books began with The Boxcar Children. Her penchant for always having a book nearby has never faded, though her reading tastes have since evolved. Rina reads around 100 books every year, with a fairly even split between fiction and non-fiction. Her favorite genres are memoirs, public health, and locked room mysteries. As an attorney, Rina can\u2019t help analyzing and deconstructing arguments in any book she reads.","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/author\/rina\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/chess-king-power.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23413","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23413"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23413\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24143,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23413\/revisions\/24143"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20556"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}