{"id":130473,"date":"2024-09-19T11:46:08","date_gmt":"2024-09-19T15:46:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?p=130473"},"modified":"2024-09-23T12:10:14","modified_gmt":"2024-09-23T16:10:14","slug":"germline-editing-ethics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/","title":{"rendered":"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Is it ethical to edit the genes of future generations? What are the potential benefits and risks of germline editing<\/a>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Germline editing ethics is a complex and controversial topic. Scientists and philosophers debate the morality of altering DNA that can be passed down to future offspring. In The Code Breaker<\/em>, Walter Isaacson shares arguments for and against this practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keep reading to explore the nuanced perspectives on this cutting-edge technology and its implications for humanity’s future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

The Ethics of Germline Editing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Isaacson says that most people think it\u2019s morally OK to edit somatic <\/em>cells\u2014non-reproductive cells that affect only an existing person\u2019s bodily composition. But people disagree about whether it\u2019s OK to edit germline <\/em>cells<\/strong>, which include eggs and sperm. When you edit germline cells, you genetically modify potential future offspring, and the changes you make could be inherited by their <\/em>offspring as well. Isaacson describes a few opinions on each side of the debate related to germline editing ethics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some people who are against <\/em>germline editing argue that it\u2019s wrong because it\u2019s heretical or unnatural<\/strong>\u2014either God or nature (via evolution) designed our genes the way they are for a reason, so humans shouldn\u2019t interfere. Isaacson says this argument may not be logical: If nature or God endowed us with the ability to develop and use CRISPR<\/a>, then using it can\u2019t <\/em>be unnatural or heretical. He also notes that genes aren\u2019t distributed fairly\u2014some people suffer more than others for no reason other than the luck of the genetic draw\u2014and we may be morally obligated to even the playing field. However, Isaacson recognizes some existential risks<\/a> of germline editing: We might develop hubris and become ungrateful for what nature or God gave us.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some people who are in favor of <\/em>germline editing argue that we have a moral duty to set our children up for success.<\/strong> Philosopher Julian Savulescu calls this stance \u201cprocreative beneficence.\u201d Isaacson says that germline editing would accomplish this goal more efficiently than somatic editing. To illustrate, consider the blood disorder called sickle cell disease: Somatic edits can cure individuals, but germline edits could prevent their descendants from developing sickle cell disease in the first place. Theoretically, this would improve human life by leaps and bounds. But there\u2019s also a downside to making germline edits\u2014we might decrease genetic diversity, which is an evolutionary disadvantage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Weighing Both Sides of the Germline Debate<\/strong>

Isaacson explains that many arguments could be made to justify taking either side of the germline debate. Let\u2019s explore those arguments in more detail now.

Isaacson says some people believe germline gene editing is heretical or unnatural, but that this is illogical because we are endowed with the ability to do so using CRISPR. Another objection to this argument is that while CRISPR germline gene editing would involve purposefully changing our children\u2019s DNA, it\u2019s not unique\u2014we already make mundane choices that have bearing on our children\u2019s genes every day.\u00a0

For example, we choose mates by subconsciously evaluating their genes<\/a>, effectively curating the gene pool from which our children\u2019s genes will be derived. We also engage in behaviors with epigenetic effects<\/em><\/a>\u2014effects on how our genes, and sometimes our children\u2019s genes, will be expressed. Smoking, for example, may be associated with inherited epigenetic susceptibility to respiratory problems<\/a>. Although these cases are obviously different from making direct changes to our children\u2019s DNA, they demonstrate that it\u2019s probably not unnatural or heretical to determine our children\u2019s genes, since we already do so unwittingly every day.

Isaacson suggests we might be morally obliged to correct harmful genetic abnormalities, but this leads to another important question\u2014who decides what qualifies as a problem to be fixed<\/a>? Some experts are worried that even if that question is decided by the court of public opinion, the answer could result in a phenomenon called \u201cvelvet eugenics<\/a>.\u201d Velvet eugenics occurs when market forces, like the relatively higher cost of raising a child with Down syndrome<\/a>, influence families to make reproductive choices that prevent the birth of children with genes they determine undesirable (like the mutations that cause Down syndrome). Velvet eugenics differs from traditional eugenics programs<\/a>, which tend to be state-sponsored, but may have similarly racist<\/a> and ableist<\/a> ends.

The fear of velvet eugenics underlies major arguments against Savulesco\u2019s standard of procreative beneficence<\/a>. Additionally, CRISPR may not even be the best way to accomplish procreative beneficence, since CRISPR germline edits can result in DNA breakage<\/a> and chromosomal losses<\/a>, which may create new <\/em>harmful genetic abnormalities without solving the original problem. But since scientists are continually working toward solutions to safety issues<\/a>, these concerns may not always stand.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Interventions vs. Enhancements<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Isaacson says that scientists aren\u2019t likely to abandon germline editing research, so society must determine under what conditions <\/em>germline editing should occur. He describes a continuum of conditions that are under heavy debate by experts in the field. Many people believe germline editing is only OK when it serves as a <\/strong>medical intervention<\/em><\/strong> (with sickle cell, for example). They don\u2019t believe it\u2019s OK to unnecessarily enhance <\/em>germline cells (like editing genes to make children conventionally attractive). They view genetic enhancements the way most people view the use of performance enhancement drugs in sports\u2014they give people an unfair advantage and undermine the significance of talent, merit, and success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Shortform note: While many people aren\u2019t OK with CRISPR-derived enhancements, some transhumanists<\/a> (who believe in using technology to enhance humans) argue that germline genetic enhancements are desirable<\/a> because it\u2019s easier to design perfected people before birth than it is to alter adults. Regardless of your stance on enhancements, you might find CRISPR-derived medical interventions objectionable for various reasons\u2014for example, many CRISPR treatments are tested on animals before they\u2019re used in human trials, and the animals involved may be harmed as a result of these experiments<\/a>. And in the same way some drug treatments can cause unwanted side effects, some research suggests that CRISPR gene editing poses a non-negligible threat of causing cancer<\/a>.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Isaacson explains that the boundary between interventions and enhancements is sometimes unclear<\/strong>\u2014for example, acne is both a medical and cosmetic issue. This issue becomes even murkier when we consider that certain genes often have disadvantages and <\/em>advantages. For example, inheritable mental illnesses are associated with higher creativity. If we edited out mental illnesses to reduce suffering<\/a>, it might have a negative effect on the arts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Shortform note: The neurodiversity movement<\/a> underlines the murkiness of the boundary between medical and non-medical issues\u2014advocates of the movement argue that brain differences like autism and ADHD don\u2019t qualify as medical issues that need to be treated, even though medical authorities historically have viewed them that way. Additionally, some experts might take issue with the link Isaacson draws between mental illness and creativity because the association between the two is poorly understood<\/a>. While the two traits may not be strongly correlated, the stereotype of the \u201cmad genius\u201d persists and may have negative effects on gifted children\u2019s development<\/a>.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Is it ethical to edit the genes of future generations? What are the potential benefits and risks of germline editing? Germline editing ethics is a complex and controversial topic. Scientists and philosophers debate the morality of altering DNA that can be passed down to future offspring. In The Code Breaker, Walter Isaacson shares arguments for and against this practice. Keep reading to explore the nuanced perspectives on this cutting-edge technology and its implications for humanity’s future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":130484,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,21,160],"tags":[1595],"class_list":["post-130473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ethics","category-philosophy","category-science","tag-the-code-breaker","","tg-column-two"],"yoast_head":"\nGermline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate - Shortform Books<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Scientists and philosophers debate the ethics of germline editing\u2014altering DNA that can be passed down. Learn the arguments on both sides.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Scientists and philosophers debate the ethics of germline editing\u2014altering DNA that can be passed down. Learn the arguments on both sides.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Shortform Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-19T15:46:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-23T16:10:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/wordpress.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1344\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Elizabeth Whitworth\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Elizabeth Whitworth\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Elizabeth Whitworth\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13\"},\"headline\":\"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-19T15:46:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-23T16:10:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/\"},\"wordCount\":1192,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"The Code Breaker\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Ethics\",\"Philosophy\",\"Science\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/\",\"name\":\"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate - Shortform Books\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-19T15:46:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-23T16:10:14+00:00\",\"description\":\"Scientists and philosophers debate the ethics of germline editing\u2014altering DNA that can be passed down. Learn the arguments on both sides.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp\",\"width\":1344,\"height\":768,\"caption\":\"Three men in lab coats discuss germline editing ethics with a chalkboard in the background\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Shortform Books\",\"description\":\"The World's Best Book Summaries\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Shortform Books\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":74,\"caption\":\"Shortform Books\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13\",\"name\":\"Elizabeth Whitworth\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Elizabeth Whitworth\"},\"description\":\"Elizabeth has a lifelong love of books. She devours nonfiction, especially in the areas of history, theology, and philosophy. A switch to audiobooks has kindled her enjoyment of well-narrated fiction, particularly Victorian and early 20th-century works. She appreciates idea-driven books\u2014and a classic murder mystery now and then. Elizabeth has a Substack and is writing a book about what the Bible says about death and hell.\",\"sameAs\":[\"rina@shortform.com\"],\"award\":[\"Contributions to joint task force efforts (FBI)\",\"Contributions to Special Operations Division (DOJ & DEA)\",\"Efforts to fight the war on drugs (NSA)\",\"Contributions to Operation Storm Front (US Customs Service)\"],\"knowsAbout\":[\"History\",\"Theology\",\"Government\"],\"jobTitle\":\"Senior SEO Writer\",\"worksFor\":\"Shortform\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/author\/elizabeth\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate - Shortform Books","description":"Scientists and philosophers debate the ethics of germline editing\u2014altering DNA that can be passed down. Learn the arguments on both sides.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate","og_description":"Scientists and philosophers debate the ethics of germline editing\u2014altering DNA that can be passed down. Learn the arguments on both sides.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/","og_site_name":"Shortform Books","article_published_time":"2024-09-19T15:46:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-23T16:10:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1344,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/wordpress.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Elizabeth Whitworth","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Elizabeth Whitworth","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/"},"author":{"name":"Elizabeth Whitworth","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13"},"headline":"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate","datePublished":"2024-09-19T15:46:08+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-23T16:10:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/"},"wordCount":1192,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp","keywords":["The Code Breaker"],"articleSection":["Ethics","Philosophy","Science"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/","name":"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate - Shortform Books","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-19T15:46:08+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-23T16:10:14+00:00","description":"Scientists and philosophers debate the ethics of germline editing\u2014altering DNA that can be passed down. Learn the arguments on both sides.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp","width":1344,"height":768,"caption":"Three men in lab coats discuss germline editing ethics with a chalkboard in the background"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/germline-editing-ethics\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Germline Editing Ethics: Walter Isaacson Lays Out the Debate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/","name":"Shortform Books","description":"The World's Best Book Summaries","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Shortform Books","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png","width":500,"height":74,"caption":"Shortform Books"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13","name":"Elizabeth Whitworth","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Elizabeth Whitworth"},"description":"Elizabeth has a lifelong love of books. She devours nonfiction, especially in the areas of history, theology, and philosophy. A switch to audiobooks has kindled her enjoyment of well-narrated fiction, particularly Victorian and early 20th-century works. She appreciates idea-driven books\u2014and a classic murder mystery now and then. Elizabeth has a Substack and is writing a book about what the Bible says about death and hell.","sameAs":["rina@shortform.com"],"award":["Contributions to joint task force efforts (FBI)","Contributions to Special Operations Division (DOJ & DEA)","Efforts to fight the war on drugs (NSA)","Contributions to Operation Storm Front (US Customs Service)"],"knowsAbout":["History","Theology","Government"],"jobTitle":"Senior SEO Writer","worksFor":"Shortform","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/author\/elizabeth\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/men-in-lab-coats-discuss.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130473"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130473\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":130483,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130473\/revisions\/130483"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/130484"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}