{"id":129723,"date":"2024-09-07T12:50:54","date_gmt":"2024-09-07T16:50:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?p=129723"},"modified":"2024-09-16T12:52:06","modified_gmt":"2024-09-16T16:52:06","slug":"theory-of-human-nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/","title":{"rendered":"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>What&#8217;s the mainstream theory of human nature? Why does Steven Pinker think it&#8217;s old-fashioned and, thus, misguided?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Throughout most of the 20th century, the mainstream intellectual <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/views-of-human-nature\/\">view of human nature<\/a> was that humans are benevolent blank slates, with immaterial souls distinct from their physical bodies. But, according to cognitive psychologist and public intellectual Steven Pinker, this view is mistaken.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Keep reading to learn what the theory is and how it falls short.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-the-mainstream-theory-of-human-nature\">The Mainstream Theory of Human Nature<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>We\u2019ll start by outlining the mainstream theory of human nature that Pinker criticizes. According to Pinker, this theory is composed of three key ideas:\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><em>Empiricism<\/em>, which says that humans have no innate traits or knowledge<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Romanticism<\/em>, which says that humans are innately good<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><em>Dualism<\/em>, which says that the mind is immaterial<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-empiricism\">Empiricism<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The core of the prevailing theory of human nature is <em>empiricism<\/em>. Pinker explains that, according to this doctrine, <strong>humans are a \u201cblank slate\u201d whose psychology and behavior are shaped only by their environment.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This theory\u2014famously trumpeted by 17th-century English philosopher John Locke\u2014holds that any differences between two people are a byproduct of different environments, rather than any traits they\u2019re born with. For example, you might think that some children are naturally agreeable and others are naturally disagreeable, but empiricism claims otherwise: Some children <em>become <\/em>disagreeable through their environments, while others become agreeable through different environments. For example, children raised by gentle, even-tempered parents might become friendly, while those raised by rude, emotionally volatile parents might become asocial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to Pinker, the upshot of empiricism is that any undesirable social conditions\u2014for example, high crime rates, poverty, and illegal substance use\u2014stem from shortcomings in our environment. For instance, high crime rates are considered a byproduct of a flawed society or upbringing, and gender disparities in different careers are blamed on the ways that society treats men and women differently.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-romanticism\">Romanticism<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Although empiricism is the cornerstone of the mainstream intellectual theory of human nature, Pinker contends that it\u2019s typically accompanied by <em>romanticism<\/em>. According to romanticism, <strong>humans are innately benevolent and altruistic<\/strong>, while our environments are responsible for our unsavory traits, like greed and aggressiveness.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This view, which is most commonly associated with 18th-century French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau, suggests that individuals who develop free from corruptive <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/societal-pressures\/\">societal pressures<\/a> will remain perfectly good. Pinker reports that, for this reason, romanticism generally opposes authoritarian approaches to government and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/raising-children\/\">raising children<\/a>, since both can corrupt otherwise good-natured people.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-dualism\">Dualism<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The third aspect of the mainstream theory of human nature is <em>dualism<\/em>. Pinker relates that dualism is the view that <strong>the body is entirely physical while the mind is entirely non-physical<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Popularized by 17th-century French philosopher Ren\u00e9 Descartes, dualism implies that the mind can\u2019t be understood using the mechanistic laws of physics, since those laws only apply to physical objects. On the contrary, dualists believe that the mind is an eternal soul that outlives the body and isn\u2019t bound by the laws of nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-the-alleged-benefits-of-the-mainstream-theory\">The Alleged Benefits of the Mainstream Theory<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Having explored <em>what<\/em> the three components of the mainstream theory of human nature are, we\u2019ll now examine <em>why <\/em>this view became mainstream by assessing three of its primary benefits. Academics claim that empiricism provides a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/how-to-create-a-strong-argument\/\">strong argument<\/a> against discrimination, dualism makes a compelling case against determinism, and romanticism makes individual and social progress possible.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-benefit-1-empiricism-prevents-discrimination-and-oppression\">Benefit #1: Empiricism Prevents Discrimination and Oppression<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Pinker contends that the mainstream view\u2019s first benefit concerns social justice. According to its proponents, <strong>this theory of human nature acts as a bulwark against discrimination and oppression<\/strong> because it makes discrimination unfounded.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to Pinker, proponents\u2019 reasoning behind this view is straightforward: Because empiricism is true, all humans are identical and only differ due to their environments. So, no discrimination is justifiable since we\u2019re all essentially identical. For example, because members of all races are identical at their core, racial discrimination is irrational.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By contrast, if empiricism were <em>false<\/em>, social scientists worry that discrimination and oppression would be legitimized. For instance, if one racial group scored higher than another on an intelligence test, that would appear to be grounds for discrimination against the group with lower scores. These differences could provide grounds for tolerating oppressive practices because group differences in society could be blamed on inherent differences. For example, wealthy people might not sympathize with the poor, claiming they have inherently less work ethic or competence.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-pinker-s-response\">Pinker\u2019s Response<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>However, Pinker argues that this benefit is moot because <strong>discrimination is unjustifiable <em>regardless<\/em> of whether there are innate differences between people<\/strong>. He explains that discrimination would be unfounded because of the basic moral truth that it\u2019s wrong to judge <em>individuals <\/em>on the basis of average traits of <em>groups<\/em>. For example, even if members of one gender committed crimes at a higher-than-average rate, it\u2019d still be prejudiced to make negative judgments about individual members of that gender, since that would amount to condemning people for a trait that they can\u2019t control\u2014in this case, their gender.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-benefit-2-romanticism-enables-progress\">Benefit #2: Romanticism Enables Progress<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates of the mainstream theory of human nature discuss the benefits of romanticism. According to Pinker, <strong>many intellectuals embrace romanticism because it makes individual and social progress possible.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s explore these proponents\u2019 reasoning. To understand the connection between romanticism and progress, imagine that romanticism were <em>false<\/em>, meaning humans weren\u2019t naturally benevolent and altruistic. If humans instead had a natural predisposition toward (say) greed, violence, and dishonesty, it would appear futile to work toward progress. After all, if society is full of inherently immoral people, any hope of creating a just society seems ill-founded. Likewise, any hope of individual moral progress seems bound to fail.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-pinker-s-response-0\">Pinker\u2019s Response<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>However, Pinker argues that<strong> this line of reasoning stems from a shoddy inference<\/strong>. Contrary to the above argument, Pinker writes that humans don\u2019t have to be <em>incapable<\/em> of altruism even if they aren\u2019t <em>naturally<\/em> altruistic. It\u2019s far more reasonable to think that humans are complex beings whose naturally problematic desires are tempered by abilities like self-restraint and reason. Consequently, progress is possible even if romanticism is false since humans can learn to conquer their desires.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-benefit-3-dualism-explains-free-will\">Benefit #3: Dualism Explains Free Will<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Advocates of the mainstream view also argue that it explains an essential part of human nature: free will. Pinker relates that, according to these advocates, <strong>dualism recognizes that we <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/there-is-no-free-will\/\">have free will<\/a><\/strong> because dualism entails that our actions aren\u2019t bound by deterministic laws of nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to many dualists, if dualism were <em>false<\/em>, then our minds would be physical objects (likely our brains) governed by the laws of nature. Then, Pinker clarifies, we\u2019d seem to lose the defining feature of free will\u2014the ability to choose otherwise. For example, if a criminal\u2019s decision to rob a bank was predetermined by the laws of nature, it seems that they <em>had to <\/em>rob the bank, meaning they didn\u2019t act freely. However, if that criminal\u2019s mind were <em>non<\/em>-physical, their decision to rob the bank wouldn\u2019t have been constrained by the laws of nature, meaning they could\u2019ve acted freely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-pinker-s-response-1\">Pinker\u2019s Response<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Pinker, however, argues that <strong>this opposition to determinism hinges on a fallacy<\/strong>\u2014the inference that fully <em>explaining <\/em>the causes of behavior amounts to <em>showing<\/em> the behavior wasn\u2019t free. In the case of the bank robber, for example, someone might infer that because the robber\u2019s actions were caused by forces outside their control (such as their genes and environment), their decision to rob the bank wasn\u2019t free.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But Pinker argues that this inference isn\u2019t valid because the alternative is that only <em>unexplained<\/em> actions can be free. Unexplained actions, however, are byproducts of random chance, and it\u2019s clear that random actions aren\u2019t free\u2014for instance, if all our decisions were the result of a random coin flip, that wouldn\u2019t qualify as free will. Thus, Pinker concludes that free will must be compatible with determinism\u2019s comprehensive explanations of our behavior.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What&#8217;s the mainstream theory of human nature? Why does Steven Pinker think it&#8217;s old-fashioned and, thus, misguided? Throughout most of the 20th century, the mainstream intellectual view of human nature was that humans are benevolent blank slates, with immaterial souls distinct from their physical bodies. But, according to cognitive psychologist and public intellectual Steven Pinker, this view is mistaken. Keep reading to learn what the theory is and how it falls short.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":129730,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,9],"tags":[1582],"class_list":["post-129723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-philosophy","category-psychology","tag-the-blank-slate","","tg-column-two"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v24.3 (Yoast SEO v24.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker) - Shortform Books<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The mainstream theory of human nature states that humans are benevolent blank slates. Learn why Steven Pinker thinks this view is misguided.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The mainstream theory of human nature states that humans are benevolent blank slates. Learn why Steven Pinker thinks this view is misguided.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Shortform Books\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-09-07T16:50:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-16T16:52:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/wordpress.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1344\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Elizabeth Whitworth\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Elizabeth Whitworth\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Elizabeth Whitworth\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13\"},\"headline\":\"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker)\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-07T16:50:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-16T16:52:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/\"},\"wordCount\":1342,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"The Blank Slate\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Philosophy\",\"Psychology\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/\",\"name\":\"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker) - Shortform Books\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-09-07T16:50:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-16T16:52:06+00:00\",\"description\":\"The mainstream theory of human nature states that humans are benevolent blank slates. Learn why Steven Pinker thinks this view is misguided.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp\",\"width\":1344,\"height\":768,\"caption\":\"People walking down a city street illustrates the mainstream theory of human nature\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Shortform Books\",\"description\":\"The World&#039;s Best Book Summaries\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Shortform Books\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":74,\"caption\":\"Shortform Books\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13\",\"name\":\"Elizabeth Whitworth\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Elizabeth Whitworth\"},\"description\":\"Elizabeth has a lifelong love of books. She devours nonfiction, especially in the areas of history, theology, and philosophy. A switch to audiobooks has kindled her enjoyment of well-narrated fiction, particularly Victorian and early 20th-century works. She appreciates idea-driven books\u2014and a classic murder mystery now and then. Elizabeth has a Substack and is writing a book about what the Bible says about death and hell.\",\"sameAs\":[\"rina@shortform.com\"],\"award\":[\"Contributions to joint task force efforts (FBI)\",\"Contributions to Special Operations Division (DOJ & DEA)\",\"Efforts to fight the war on drugs (NSA)\",\"Contributions to Operation Storm Front (US Customs Service)\"],\"knowsAbout\":[\"History\",\"Theology\",\"Government\"],\"jobTitle\":\"Senior SEO Writer\",\"worksFor\":\"Shortform\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/author\/elizabeth\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker) - Shortform Books","description":"The mainstream theory of human nature states that humans are benevolent blank slates. Learn why Steven Pinker thinks this view is misguided.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker)","og_description":"The mainstream theory of human nature states that humans are benevolent blank slates. Learn why Steven Pinker thinks this view is misguided.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/","og_site_name":"Shortform Books","article_published_time":"2024-09-07T16:50:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-16T16:52:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1344,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/wordpress.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Elizabeth Whitworth","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Elizabeth Whitworth","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/"},"author":{"name":"Elizabeth Whitworth","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13"},"headline":"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker)","datePublished":"2024-09-07T16:50:54+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-16T16:52:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/"},"wordCount":1342,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp","keywords":["The Blank Slate"],"articleSection":["Philosophy","Psychology"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/","name":"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker) - Shortform Books","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp","datePublished":"2024-09-07T16:50:54+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-16T16:52:06+00:00","description":"The mainstream theory of human nature states that humans are benevolent blank slates. Learn why Steven Pinker thinks this view is misguided.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp","width":1344,"height":768,"caption":"People walking down a city street illustrates the mainstream theory of human nature"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/theory-of-human-nature\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why the Mainstream Theory of Human Nature Is Flawed (Pinker)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/","name":"Shortform Books","description":"The World&#039;s Best Book Summaries","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Shortform Books","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/logo-equilateral-with-text-no-bg.png","width":500,"height":74,"caption":"Shortform Books"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/d2928cf6c11a69ced1491d6a5b74fb13","name":"Elizabeth Whitworth","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1fff9d65a52ac4340660218e7b63ee5e365cf08e7aa7adff79a0142cd4b96f84?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Elizabeth Whitworth"},"description":"Elizabeth has a lifelong love of books. She devours nonfiction, especially in the areas of history, theology, and philosophy. A switch to audiobooks has kindled her enjoyment of well-narrated fiction, particularly Victorian and early 20th-century works. She appreciates idea-driven books\u2014and a classic murder mystery now and then. Elizabeth has a Substack and is writing a book about what the Bible says about death and hell.","sameAs":["rina@shortform.com"],"award":["Contributions to joint task force efforts (FBI)","Contributions to Special Operations Division (DOJ & DEA)","Efforts to fight the war on drugs (NSA)","Contributions to Operation Storm Front (US Customs Service)"],"knowsAbout":["History","Theology","Government"],"jobTitle":"Senior SEO Writer","worksFor":"Shortform","url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/author\/elizabeth\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/people-walking-down-city-street.webp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129723"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129723\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":129731,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129723\/revisions\/129731"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/129730"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}