{"id":122010,"date":"2024-02-01T11:59:00","date_gmt":"2024-02-01T15:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/?p=122010"},"modified":"2024-02-01T15:09:18","modified_gmt":"2024-02-01T19:09:18","slug":"read-people-like-a-book-patrick-king","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shortform.com\/blog\/read-people-like-a-book-patrick-king\/","title":{"rendered":"Read People Like a Book by Patrick King: Book Overview"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Where do subconscious motivations come from? What can nonverbal cues<\/a> tell you? Wouldn’t it be helpful to know what people are thinking without asking them?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Read People<\/a> Like a Book<\/em>, Patrick King claims that anyone can look at a person and know what type of person they are. When you’ve mastered this ability, you can handle conflict better and call out a liar from a mile away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read below for a brief overview of Read People Like a Book<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Read People Like a Book<\/em> by Patrick King<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In Read People Like a Book<\/em><\/a>, Patrick King argues that you can come close to reading people<\/a> by learning how to interpret peoples\u2019 speech, behavior, body language<\/a>, and possessions to glean insights into their motivations and personalities. This ability allows you to more effectively navigate relationships, deal with difficult personalities, get what you want from others\u2014and spot a liar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Patrick King<\/a> is a social interaction specialist who coaches people on dating, personal presentation, and communication. He\u2019s written e-books on online dating<\/a>, emotional intelligence, and communication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this guide, we\u2019ll outline King\u2019s advice on what to look for when reading other people<\/a>, taking into consideration factors like situational context, your own biases, and the different drives and patterns of thinking that nonverbal communication<\/a> often reflects. Along the way, we\u2019ll examine advice from other experts on how to read people<\/a>, as well as additional theories explaining these techniques. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

How to Approach Reading People<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

King writes that people generally consider themselves good judges of character, but in reality, assessing another person is harder than it seems\u2014people often misinterpret signs and then arrive at misguided conclusions<\/strong> about how another person feels or thinks. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

King advises that to avoid falling into this trap when trying to read another person, you should consider some factors that might affect your interpretation of their behavior:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Behavioral status quo: <\/strong>To accurately read someone, you have to know how they normally behave and speak so you can pick up on anomalies or changes in their behavior. For instance, if your friend always has a lot of energy, you shouldn\u2019t interpret this as excitement about something that just happened\u2014that may simply be their baseline state of being. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Multiple data points: <\/strong>You can\u2019t form a conclusion about someone based on a single data point\u2014a single sentence or gesture, for example. You must pay attention to multiple data points to form an accurate conclusion about someone\u2019s inner state. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Context: <\/strong>You have to consider the context in which a behavior is happening, or you\u2019ll likely misinterpret that behavior. For instance, if you see someone moving around restlessly, you might read that behavior as nervousness, when in reality, it might simply be cold in the room and the person is trying to stay warm. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, recognize that you yourself might affect the other person\u2019s behavior. For example, if you\u2019re in a position of power, the other person may change their body language in response, which might skew how they present themselves. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Your own biases:<\/strong> Recognize that you may have prejudices and assumptions that lead you to interpret cues in a certain way. For example, if you tend to be suspicious of others, you may interpret someone\u2019s actions as deceitful when they\u2019re not. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Drives Behavior?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

King writes that to determine why a person behaves in a certain way, you must understand two aspects of their psyche: their <\/strong>motivations<\/em><\/strong> and <\/strong>personality<\/em><\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Motivations are the urges and wants that compel a person to act. These include subconscious urges, the pursuit of pleasure, human needs, and our ego. We\u2019ll examine each of these factors, as well as personality, in the following sections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Subconscious Urge<\/strong>s<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Subconscious motivations, writes King, come from the part of your psyche that psychologist Carl Jung called the shadow<\/em>\u2014the part we try to ignore, repress, and hide from others. In the shadow live sexual urges, creative urges, insecurities, dislikes, self-loathing, and so on. Because these live in the subconscious<\/a>, you may not even be fully aware of these motivations at any given moment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

King contends that it\u2019s not possible to permanently repress subconscious urges, and that eventually, these repressed feelings will motivate a person to behave in ways that might bring them harm<\/strong>\u2014that might hurt a relationship, for example, or drive them to make poor financial decisions. For instance, a lawyer who\u2019s long repressed a desire to write poetry might criticize the efforts of a friend who was recently published, or a person who secretly longs to be fabulously wealthy might impulsively buy a risky stock. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

King writes that when you can identify the subconscious motives of another person, you\u2019ll know how to engage them more effectively<\/strong>. You might even be able to manipulate them if you know how to appeal to their secret desires and fears. You\u2019re also less likely to be emotionally hurt by their bad behavior if you can recognize that it\u2019s motivated by fear, anger, self-loathing, or other negative, repressed emotions<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Pleasure Principle<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

King writes that people are often motivated by the <\/strong>pleasure principle<\/em><\/strong>: the desire to pursue pleasure and avoid pain<\/strong>. It\u2019s our most basic, primitive motivator, and it drives virtually everything we do. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He notes a few rules governing the pleasure principle, two of which in particular can help you figure out what drives another person:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Our desire to avoid pain is stronger than our desire to find pleasure. <\/strong>This stems from our survival instinct<\/a>: It\u2019s usually more important that we avoid things that will hurt us than that we chase things that will make us more comfortable. King gives an example of stumbling upon a treasure chest that\u2019s in the path of an oncoming train\u2014you\u2019re unlikely to jump toward the chest, since you\u2019d rather avoid injury or death than gain riches. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Emotions rule. <\/strong>Emotions usually trump logic when it comes to pleasure and pain. Thus, even if you rationally know that something will be good or bad for you, you might still indulge in an irrational action if the craving for it is strong enough. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you keep these instincts in mind, you can better understand why a person chooses to do something that may not at first seem logical. You can also better engage that person\u2014you can appeal to their desires or allay their fears and can thus have a more productive interaction with them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our Hierarchy of Needs<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

King notes that the pleasure principle doesn\u2019t guide every single one of our decisions\u2014people are often able to resist cravings or to let their rational mind outweigh their emotions. This is because we have additional motivations driving our behavior beyond the mere pursuit of pleasure or avoidance of pain<\/strong>. Psychologists often frame these as a hierarchical set of needs, as outlined by professor Abraham Maslow in the 1940s. Maslow\u2019s Hierarchy of Needs<\/em> identifies five levels of human needs:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

  1. Physiological fulfillment: These are basic survival needs like food and shelter.<\/li>
  2. Safety: These needs ensure that those of the first level will continue to be met. They include income and security.<\/li>
  3. Love and belonging: These include relationships and community.<\/li>
  4. Self-esteem: At this level, a person is concerned with status and respect from peers.<\/li>
  5. Self-actualization: This level encompasses the desire to contribute something to the world beyond oneself\u2014it includes morality, creativity, altruism, and the like. <\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    King writes that if you can identify which of these needs a person is responding to, you can more effectively work with them, help them, or get them to do what you want<\/strong>. For example, if you detect that your employee is upset, first identify which need she\u2019s upset about. If she\u2019s concerned she might lose her job, you\u2019ll more effectively help her if you assure her that her job is safe, therefore addressing her level 2 concerns, rather than if you tell her how great it is to have friends (a level 3 concern).  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The Desire to Defend the Ego<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

    Another common human motivator that King identifies is the desire to protect our egos: our sense of self. <\/strong>People want to see themselves positively\u2014as competent, athletic, intelligent, and so on. When events threaten to destroy that self-image, people often behave in strange ways to protect and defend it. When you can recognize that someone is reacting based on this instinct, you can more effectively deal with them. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Personality<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

    King writes that another important factor that drives behavior is personality<\/em>, which he defines as a consistent pattern of behavior and thinking over time. Psychologists generally measure personality as a collection of spectrums with character extremes on each end, such as extroversion versus introversion, or a measure of how neurotic you are (very<\/em> versus not at all<\/em>). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    To judge a person\u2019s personality, think about how they usually react to events or triggers<\/strong>. When you can identify a person\u2019s typical response, you can predict how they\u2019ll likely react to any specific situation. This can help you better engage and interact with them. For example, you\u2019ll be better able to manage conflict or disagreement: If you\u2019re speaking to someone with a rational temperament, you might emphasize the logic of your argument, whereas if you\u2019re speaking to someone with an idealist temperament, you might emphasize your argument\u2019s humaneness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    King mentions another benefit to becoming adept in reading personalities<\/a>: People who can read others well are often seen as more likable, intelligent, and even attractive. This is because if you can adjust your behavior according to the psychological or emotional needs of the other person, they\u2019ll feel you empathize with them and understand their way of thinking. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    How to Read Nonverbal Cues<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    Now that we\u2019ve reviewed some of the factors underpinning behavior, we\u2019ll look at some specific ways a person\u2019s behavior may indicate their inner mind. We\u2019ll examine in particular how this happens through nonverbal communication<\/em>\u2014what we say using our bodies, not our words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    King writes that we communicate more information nonverbally than verbally<\/strong>, and these messages often more accurately reflect our thoughts and feelings<\/a> than our words do. This is because nonverbal communication is how the primitive side of our brain expresses its emotions, and that side of our brain can\u2019t lie\u2014unlike the more developed, rational side. Thus, we may say one thing with the words our rational brain chooses, but we may say something different with our posture, facial expressions, and so on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    He therefore argues that to effectively read someone\u2014to know when they\u2019re lying, holding something back, or trying to hide an emotion\u2014you must learn to read their nonverbal cues: their facial expressions, body language, appearance, and manner of speaking. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Facial Expressions<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

    King writes you can glean a lot of information from a person\u2019s facial expressions\u2014in particular, from their microexpressions<\/em>: slight, brief facial expressions that a person makes as an automatic response to something. Because microexpressions are physiological, knee-jerk reactions to a stimulus, they\u2019re hard to conceal or fake<\/strong> and are thus good indicators of a person\u2019s true thoughts or feelings. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    King cautions that it can be difficult to read a person\u2019s microexpressions\u2014because they happen so quickly, you may have to watch someone more closely than is appropriate for a typical social situation. Further, he cautions against reading too much into any microexpressions. An expression of stress may indicate nervousness or discomfort, rather than deceit. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Body Language<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

    King writes that you can also assess how people are truly feeling\u2014despite what they\u2019re saying\u2014by watching their body language: how they move their arms, legs, shoulders, and so on, and how they hold their posture. He notes some specific behaviors you can look out for that are often reliable clues to a person\u2019s true feelings: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Physical fight, flight, or freeze responses:<\/strong> Our responses to danger have remained the same over years of evolution, so we can use those tells to determine if someone feels like they\u2019re in danger. Someone having a fight<\/em> response might make threatening gestures, someone having a flight<\/em> response might shift away from the threat (by leaning back from the person talking, for example), and someone having a freeze<\/em> response might hold tight to something, like the edge of their desk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Self-soothing behaviors: <\/strong>King writes that self-soothing behaviors, like when someone rubs or touches their shoulders, legs, or fingers, indicate a person is nervous or stressed. The neck is a particularly vulnerable area of our bodies, and someone who feels threatened often covers or strokes it\u2014for example, they might fidget with a necktie or necklace, or squeeze the top of their neck. They might also exhibit \u201cventilating\u201d behaviors like moving their hair off their shoulders or moving their collar away from their neck, as if they\u2019re trying to \u201ccool off\u201d stress. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Deceitful behaviors: <\/strong>When people are lying, they may move nervously or fidget, indicating they feel a conflict between their internal reality and their external claims. They may lift their shoulders while saying they\u2019re telling the truth, or they may scratch their nose, move their head to the side, or avoid eye contact. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Confidence-projecting behaviors: <\/strong>People who are confident often make themselves appear big: They might make large gestures and leave their torsos (the most vulnerable part of the body) exposed to signal they\u2019re not afraid of being attacked. A person feeling a lack of confidence will do the opposite\u2014they\u2019ll hunch their shoulders or sit back to be less visible. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Mirroring behaviors:<\/strong> We mirror other people when we like and feel connected to them, and we avoid mirroring them when we dislike them. You can assess how someone feels about you by seeing if they\u2019re adopting your posture, gestures, voice speed, or other quirks of behavior.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Appearance<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

    King notes that people\u2019s clothes are often good indicators of personality because people dress to purposefully communicate things about themselves. All you have to do, then, is take in the information they\u2019re putting out there. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Pay attention to how much effort someone has put into their appearance<\/strong>. If it looks like they haven\u2019t tried hard, they may be depressed or have low self-esteem<\/a>. Conversely, if they\u2019ve put a lot of effort into their appearance, they may be confident or eager for you to think well of them. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Note if someone\u2019s clothes are unsuited to the current situation. <\/strong>This may indicate something about how the wearer perceives themselves and wants others to perceive them. For instance, if someone shows up to a dive bar wearing high-heels and cashmere, they might perceive themselves and want others to perceive them as extremely classy and sophisticated (and possibly above going to dive bars). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Manner of Speaking <\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

    King also writes that the way a person uses words can tell you a lot about their personality<\/strong>. For example, someone with a negative or angry outlook might use strong or harsh language to talk about relatively minor incidents (for instance, saying they \u201cabsolutely hate it\u201d when the train is late). Or, someone who\u2019s eager to be perceived as intelligent might use technical jargon when they don\u2019t have to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    How to Detect Lies<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    King writes that one of the main reasons people want to learn to read others is to detect when they\u2019re being lied to<\/strong>. This is an understandable concern\u2014nobody wants to be tricked, and a person who can detect lies has an advantage when negotiating or otherwise interacting with people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Unfortunately, it\u2019s difficult to detect lies. The nonverbal cues discussed above that we often hope will reveal deceit can be hard to read. Different people have different indicators because they react uniquely to the uncomfortable feeling of lying\u2014one person might fidget while another frowns more than usual. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Furthermore, liars are often aware of how nonverbal cues can be read and will often consciously avoid making mistakes that would give them away. If they know averting their eyes conveys deceit, for example, they\u2019ll make sure not to do that.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    King writes that the best way to unearth a lie is not to look for individual, specific indicators, but instead, to have a conversation with the other person and then evaluate it holistically. Then: <\/p>\n\n\n\n