Is Zen Buddhism Mahayana? How did ideas from India shape a philosophy that emerged in China?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alan Watts discusses the origins of Zen<\/a> Buddhism in his book The Way of Zen<\/em>. He explains that Zen ideas came largely out of three different traditions. One of these is Mahayana Buddhism, and Watts outlines two concepts that the two philosophies share.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Keep reading to learn how Mahayana Buddhism helped shape Zen Buddhism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Is Zen Buddhism Mahayana? Zen is considered to be a form of Mahayana Buddhism, but Mahayana is only one school of thought that Zen and its ideas trace back to. The others are Taoism and Confucianism, which are Chinese forms of thought and religion. On the other hand, Mahayana Buddhism is an Indian school of Buddhism. Each of the three traditions contributed ideas that would become foundational to Zen Buddhist teachings about life and enlightenment. Let’s examine Mahayana Buddhism and its influence on Zen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mahayana Buddhism reframes the pursuit of nirvana<\/em><\/strong>, the traditional Buddhist idea of release from karma<\/a> and cycles of death and rebirth. Mahayana takes the idea of this cycle figuratively, explaining that the pursuit of nirvana<\/em> is futile and we\u2019re continually reborn from moment to moment until we stop trying to escape what\u2019s really happening in the present moment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n (Shortform note: Mahayana Buddhism is a family of Buddhist traditions<\/a> (rather than a singular school) that proposes that all beings possess the potential for awakening<\/a>. So it\u2019s not surprising that while Watts characterizes Mahayana’s views of karma<\/em> and nirvana<\/em> as figurative, other scholars offer alternate explanations. Philosopher Jay Garfield explains that it\u2019s a core idea<\/a> of Buddhism that we\u2019re reborn every moment<\/a>. Some traditions also teach that we\u2019re reborn to new biological lives while others don\u2019t consider this idea important or take it literally. But Garfield notes that in Mahayana Buddhism, a belief in cycles of biological rebirth is almost a prerequisite: Pursuing awakening is difficult and may require multiple lifetimes to achieve.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Two ideas from Mahayana Buddhism had a major impact on Zen: the idea that we don\u2019t perceive the world as it really is and the idea that there\u2019s nothing for us to attain in life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Important to Zen is Mahayana Buddhism\u2019s teaching that illusions obscure your perception of the world<\/a>. Watts explains that the principle of maya<\/em> is that the language we use to describe the world obscures what it really is<\/strong>. Maya<\/em> is about relativity: We name things like \u201clight\u201d and \u201cdarkness\u201d or \u201cgood\u201d and \u201cevil\u201d and consider them opposites. But, in reality, they aren\u2019t separate. Watts explains that Hindus and Buddhists refer to the world as \u201cnondual\u201d rather than as \u201cone\u201d because even the concept of \u201cone\u201d draws on a false duality (it\u2019s conceptually opposite to \u201cmany\u201d). Letting go of the impulse to name and delineate things enables you to perceive the relativity and impermanence of the world and experience moksha<\/em>, a \u201cliberation\u201d from maya<\/em>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n (Shortform note: Experts say that maya<\/em> hides the true nature of reality<\/a> and moksha<\/em> occurs when we shed the illusions<\/a> of maya<\/em>. Writer George Saunders, who practices Nyingma Tibetan Buddhism, explains that Buddhists believe a significant gap<\/a> exists between the way things are and the way we perceive them, and this causes suffering. Saunders notes that if we could believe what Buddhism teaches\u2014that our lives are impermanent, the world as we know it is transient, and that we have no fixed self\u2014then our pain would disappear.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n It follows from the principles of maya <\/em>and moksha <\/em>that language also curtails what you can understand of yourself. Watts writes that in all forms of Buddhism, you can\u2019t apprehend your true self<\/a> because there\u2019s no permanent or unchanging self to understand<\/strong>. He points out that what you think of as your self or ego is just an abstraction. Your true self<\/a> eludes your understanding if you hold onto that abstraction. <\/p>\n\n\n\n (Shortform note: Novelist and Zen priest Ruth Ozeki explains that according to Zen, the idea of a separate self<\/a> is an illusion. She compares our self-concept to that of a wave in the ocean: The wave might think that it\u2019s something discrete and separate from all the other waves for a moment, but in reality, there\u2019s no border between it and the rest of the ocean. Similarly, Eckhart Tolle writes in A New Earth<\/em><\/a> that your ego<\/a> creates a false self-image that obscures your true inner self<\/a>. He explains that mindfulness<\/a> requires accessing your true self<\/a> because it\u2019s part of the energy that directs the entire universe.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Another Mahayana idea that\u2019s foundational to Zen is the doctrine that there\u2019s nothing for us to grasp at, even <\/strong>nirvana<\/em><\/strong>. (One of the Four Noble Truths of Buddhism is nirvana<\/em>, which Watts characterizes as analogous to moksha<\/em>. Nirvana<\/em> is a state of awakening.) When we seek things, we fail to see that everything exists in a state of relativity, where nothing exists except in relation to other things. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The origin of this idea is unclear. Watts writes that some scholars think that one of the earliest ideas of Mahayana Buddhism was that one could be a Bodhisattva<\/a><\/em> and reach enlightenment<\/a> by foregoing nirvana<\/em> until all beings can experience it. But Watts argues that the idea underlying the Bodhisattva<\/em> is implicit in the logic of Buddhism: Nirvana<\/em> is a state you reach when you stop trying to grasp reality. But if there\u2019s nothing to grasp, then how is there anything to attain? <\/p>\n\n\n\n (Shortform note: The idea of giving up all seeking, including the pursuit of awakening, sounds counterintuitive. Experts say that a Bodhisattva<\/em> simply gives up their desires so they can help others achieve theirs<\/a>. In Street Zen<\/em><\/a>, a biography of Zen monk Issan Dorsey, David Schneider writes that being a Bodhisattva<\/em> involves becoming the kind of person<\/a> who helps others attain freedom from illusions. Schneider characterizes Dorsey as an \u201cunlikely Bodhisattva<\/a>\u201d: He became a Zen master after being discharged from the US Navy for homosexuality, working as a drag queen, and experiencing drug addiction. Dorsey looked on people leading similar lives with \u201ca direct, personal compassion\u201d and established a hospice for men dying of AIDS in the 1980s.) <\/p>\n\n\n\n The word <\/strong>tathata<\/em><\/strong>, often translated as \u201csuchness,\u201d represents the true state of all beings, including Buddhas, people who have experienced awakening<\/strong>. That means that all beings can become Buddhas. It also means that by letting go of the abstractions through which you usually see the world and yourself, you can experience the world in its \u201csuchness.\u201d Watts explains that the use of a word like \u201csuchness\u201d to describe the true nature of all beings is intended to remind us that while \u201cmeaning\u201d is a quality of thought or language, it doesn\u2019t exist in the actual world. In other words, the idea of a person is separate from the reality of the person.<\/p>\n\n\n\n (Shortform note: Other experts agree that tathata<\/em>, or suchness, is a crucial concept in Zen. In Religions of Japan in Practice<\/em><\/a>, <\/em>Jacqueline I. Stone writes that from the idea of suchness, it follows that you don\u2019t practice Buddhism to attain Buddhahood but instead to express it<\/a>. She explains that a 12th-century text called Shinnyo kan<\/em>, or \u201cContemplation of Suchness<\/em>,\u201d posits that Buddhahood lies in the contemplation of yourself and other entities in their suchness, removed from false ideas about their permanence or separateness<\/a> from each other.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Is Zen Buddhism Mahayana? How did ideas from India shape a philosophy that emerged in China? Alan Watts discusses the origins of Zen Buddhism in his book The Way of Zen. He explains that Zen ideas came largely out of three different traditions. One of these is Mahayana Buddhism, and Watts outlines two concepts that the two philosophies share. Keep reading to learn how Mahayana Buddhism helped shape Zen Buddhism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":34949,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,21,6],"tags":[1085],"class_list":["post-106925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-history","category-philosophy","category-spiritual","tag-the-way-of-zen","","tg-column-two"],"yoast_head":"\nIs Zen Buddhism Mahayana?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
We Don\u2019t Perceive the Real World<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
There\u2019s Nothing to Pursue or Attain, Not Even Nirvana<\/h3>\n\n\n\n